16_ by ides editor

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012

Behaviour Of RC Framed Building With Different Lateral Bracing Systems Prof. Sarita Singla1, Megha Kalra2, Rahul Kalra3 and Taranjeet Kaur4 1

PEC University of Technology/Civil Engineering Department, Chandigarh, India Email: ssaritasingla@yahoo.com 2 Chandigarh college of engineering and technology/Civil Engineering Department, Chandigarh, India Email: Duskmk@gmail.com 3 Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat, India Email: Rahul325@gmail.com 4 Baddi University/Civil Engineering Department, Himachal Pradesh, India Email: taran_madaan@yahoo.co.in cost, steel bracing appears to be a better alternative. It was therefore considered necessary to carry the present study on Structural Behavior of RC building with different laterally braced systems to assess the performance of the bracing system.

Abstract— Multistoreyed buildings are most affected by earthquake forces in seismic prone areas. The major concern in the design of the multi-storey buildings is the structure to have enough lateral stability to resist lateral forces and to control the lateral drift of the building. The use of steel bracing systems in reinforced concrete frames is a viable solution for resisting lateral forces. Steel bracing is economical, easy to erect, occupies less space and has flexibility in design for meeting the required strength and stiffness. In the present study eighteen storeyed building is analyzed with three different types of bracings and each bracing has been provided at three different locations. The types of bracing studied are X-brace, V-brace and K-brace. In the first location, bracings are provided in the exterior frame at corners. In the second location, bracings are again provided in the exterior frame, but in the middle bays. Finally, in the third location, bracings are provided in the middle bays in exterior and interior frames both. In all nine different cases of braced RC frames are analyzed and compared with unbraced RC frame, using STAAD PRO-2007 with Response Spectrum method. It has been seen that X bracing shows the best performance.

Types of Bracings Bracing systems are classified depending on whether the braces create perfect triangulation. Based on this they are most commonly used under two categories, Concentric bracing system and eccentric bracing system. A. Concentric Bracing The Bracing is concentric when the center lines of the bracing members intersect. Concentric bracings increase the lateral stiffness of the frame, thus increasing the natural frequency and also usually decreasing the lateral drift [5]. However, increase in the stiffness may attract a larger inertia force due to earthquake. Further, while the bracings decrease the bending moments and shear forces in columns, they increase the axial compression in the columns to which they are connected. Various types of concentric bracing are: V brace- Bracing where a pair of braces, located both above beam, terminates at a single point within the clear beam span. Inverted V brace- is that form of chevron bracing that intersects a beam from below. X brace- Bracing where a pair of diagonal braces crosses near mid-length of the bracing members. K brace- Bracing where a pair of braces located on one side of a column terminates at a single point within the clear column height.

Index Terms—RC frame, steel bracing, fundamental time period, base shear, lateral displacement, storey drift, axial force.

I. INTRODUCTION The aftermath of an earthquake manifests great devastation due to unpredicted seismic motion striking extensive damage to innumerable buildings of varying degree, i.e. either full or partial. This damage to structures in turn causes irreparable loss of life with a large number of casualties. Therefore, most buildings are designed with lateral-forceresisting systems to resist the effects of earthquake forces. In many cases laterally braced systems make a building stiffer against horizontal forces, and thus minimize the amount of relative lateral movement and consequently the damage.It can be concluded that both structural and non-structural damages are observed during earthquake ground motions are primarily produced by lateral displacements. Therefore, in order to increase the seismic strength of framed structures, steel bracing or shear walls are often used [4]. However, considering the ease of construction and the relatively low © 2012 ACEE DOI: 02.AETACE.2012.3.16

B. Eccentric Bracing In an eccentrically braced frame bracing members connect to separate points on the beam/girder. The beam/girder segment or “link” between the bracing members absorbs energy from seismic activity through plastic deformation [6]. Eccentric Bracings reduce the lateral stiffness of the system and improve the energy dissipation capacity. Due to eccentric connection of the braces to beams, the lateral stiffness of the system depends upon the flexural stiffness of the beams and 151

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012 columns, thus reducing the lateral stiffness of the frame. The vertical component of the bracing forces due to earthquake causes lateral concentrated load on the beams at the point of connection of the eccentric bracings.

The building had 5 bays of 4m each in X direction and 3 bays of 4m each in Z direction. The height of each storey was 3.00 m. The building was to be used for residential purpose and the ductile detailing of steel was done as per Indian standard code (IS) 13920:1993[1] for special moment resisting frame. The grade of concrete used for beams was M30 and for columns was M40. The grade of steel used was Fe415. TABLE I. MEMBER PROPERTIES

Fig. 1. Typical arrangements of eccentric bracings

II. PARAMETERS OF THE BUILDING The building considered had plan dimensions of 20m x 12m at each floor level and was considered to be in Indian seismic zone V. The frames were assumed to be firmly fixed at the bottom and the soilâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;structure interaction was neglected. The building was analyzed with three different types of bracings viz X brace, V brace and K brace at three different location L1, L2 and L3(Refer Figs. 1.1 - 4).

(a)X brace at L2

(b) V brace at L3

Fig. 4. Elevation of building with different bracings.

Loading- Various types of load considered are discussed in succeeding sections. Dead Load- The dead load on all floors was considered as 6 KN/m2. The wall load of inner 4.5" thick brick wall was taken as 7.5 KN/m and that of outer 9" thick brick walls was taken as 12 KN/m (after deductions for openings). Live Load- The live load had been taken as 3.00 KN/m2 for intermediate floors and 1.5 KN/m2 for roof [3]. Seismic Load- As per IS-1893-2002 [2], the dynamic analysis was performed using Response Spectrum Method. In response spectrum method design parameters for horizontal seismic coefficient were as below: Z, zone factor = 0.36 I, importance factor = 1 R. response reduction factor = 5 Damping ratio = 0.05 Load Combinations- The different load combinations to be analyzed were as per IS 875(Part 3):1987

Fig. 1.1. Plan of building showing bracings at location L1

Fig.2. Plan of building showing bracings at location L2

III. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS The building frames have been analyzed using response spectrum method in STAADPRO-2006, which is based on stiffness matrix method of analysis. Various parameters like Fundamental time period, Base shear, Lateral displacements, Storey shears, Bending moment, Shear force and axial force in various members have been compared in the succeeding sections.

Fig. 3. Plan of building showing bracings at location L3 - - - - Represents bracing members

ÂŠ 2012 ACEE DOI: 02.AETACE.2012.3.16

152

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012 A. Time Period of Building From Table II it is evident that with the addition of bracing members the fundamental time period of the building decreases. Building with X bracing at location L3 gives minimum time period of 2.454 seconds as compared to 3.456 seconds of unbraced building. It has been seen that the percentage reduction for eighteen storeyed building varies from 3.5 to 30% with maximum reduction in X bracing at location L3 TABLE II. FUNDAMENTAL T IME PERIOD( SECS)

D. Lateral Displacement at Various Height Typical nodes at storey height of 0m, 3m, 6m, 9m, 12m, 15m, 18m, 21m, 24m, 27m, 30m, 33m, 36m, 39m, 42m, 45m, 48m, 51m, 54m are selected. For comparative study displacements are checked at these nodes for all load combinations. The results were compared and it is seen that the displacement increased with the increase in storey height but the braced building showed less displacements as compared to unbraced building (refer Fig.6-8). The maximum displacement for building with X bracing at location L3 is 82.36 mm as compared to 156 mm in unbraced building. So there is 60% decrease for X bracing at L3 location. In V and K braced building the reduction is up to 10% for all heights. The maximum percentage reduction is observed at 12 m height.

BUILDING

B. Spectral Acceleration of Building From Table III it has been concluded that the maximum increase is seen for X braced building with value of 0.407 and the minimum increase for K braced building with the value of spectral acceleration as 0.29974. So there is 40.83% increase in X bracing at L3 location and 3.60% increase for K bracing at L3 location. TABLE III .SPECTRAL ACCELERATION BUILDING Fig. 6. Lateral Displacement in X-braced building

C. Base Shear of Building It is evident that the base shear increases with the addition of bracing members. Fig. 5 showed that the maximum increase is seen in X braced building. This is because with the increase in spectral acceleration the horizontal seismic coefficient (Ah) increases. The maximum increases is recorded for X bracing at location L1 of 107.76% and minimum of 15.7% for K bracing for L2 location.

Fig. 7. Lateral Displacement in V-braced building

Fig. 5. Base Shear of building

ÂŠ 2012 ACEE DOI: 02.AETACE.2012.3.16

153

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012

Fig. 10. Storey Drift in V-braced building Fig. 8. Lateral Displacement in K-braced building

E. Storey Drift of Building As per IS1893:2002 [2], the storey drift in any storey due to minimum specified design force shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height. From Fig. 9-11, it is found that all the results are within permissible limits. It is observed that drift increased up to height of 12 m and then showed a considerable decrease. It is very clear that drift is more when no bracing members are provided but when bracing member are provided than drift decreases. By comparison X bracing showed least drift as compared to other cases. The maximum drift of 0.29 cm is observed for building with X-bracing at location L2. So there was 75.63% reduction for this case. Similarly, in V and K braced building maximum percentage reduction of 15.04 % and 11.53 % is observed for location L2 and L1 respectively.

Fig. 11. Storey Drift in K-braced building

loads are transferred from columns and beams to bracing members. After comparison (refer table IV-VI) it can be stated that X braced building carried maximum axial force in bracings at all the three locations L1, L2, L3. T ABLE IV. AXIAL FORCE(KN) IN B RACING

Fig. 9. Storey Drift in X-braced building

TABLE V.AXIAL FORCE(KN)

F. Axial Forces in Bracings The results of axial forces in bracing members are shown in Table IV to VI for all cases. The members selected are designated as A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, and C3. The member designation of A, B, C for the three locations L1, L2, L3 is shown in Fig. 1-3 and 1 represents the members on ground level, 2 represents members on third floor level and 3 represents members on top floor level. It is evident that axial force is more for the cases which showed less bending moment, shear force and vice versa. This is because the lateral ÂŠ 2012 ACEE DOI: 02.AETACE.2012.3.16

154

MEMBERS AT

B RACING MEMBERS

L1 LOCATION

LOCATION

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012 TABLE VI. AXIAL FORCE(KN)

B RACING MEMBERS

CONCLUSIONS

LOCATION

It has been seen that the performance of the building enhanced with the provision of bracings in the framed system. It is recommended that the building with X bracing at exterior frame in middle bays with or without bracings in interior frame showed the best performance. The K bracings are the least preferred bracing type. REFERENCES [1] IS 13920:1997, “Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces-code of practice”. [2] IS 1893(part 1):2002, “Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1general provisions and buildings”. [3] IS 875(Part 5):1987, “Code of Practice For Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings And Structures Part 5 Special Loads And Combinations”. [4] Maheri, M.R. and Sahebi, A. (1997). “Use of Steel Bracing in Reinforced Concrete Frames”, Engineering Structures, 19(12), 1018-1024. [5] Desai J. P., Jain A. K. and Arya A. S., “Seismic response of R. C. braced frames”, Computers and Structures Volume 29 No.4, pp 557568, 1988. [6] Ravikumar G. and Kalyanaraman V., “Seismic design and retrofit of RC multistoried buildings with steel bracing”, National Program on Earthquake Engineering Education, 2005.

G. Bending Moment and Shear Force in Columns Bending moment and Shear force at the base of various typical columns is studied for all load cases. It is found that bending moment and shear force is more when no bracings are provided but when bracing members are provided a considerable decrease is seen. This is due to the transfer of lateral loads from columns to bracing members. It is observed that X braced building has least forces in columns with percentage reduction up to 78% and 71% in bending moment and shear force respectively.

155