Illustration by Chiara Dissette, www.dissette.com
IIAS Newsletter 41 | Summer 2006 | free of charge | published by IIAS | P.O. Box 9515 | 2300 RA Leiden | The Netherlands | T +31-71-527 2227 | F +31-71-527 4162 | iias@let.leidenuniv.nl | www.iias.nl
G r e g o r y Fo r t h
Conferences and exhibitions: pp. 36-39
Documentary film Nalini by Day, Nancy by Night: pp. 20-21
>
Thinking with 19th century photographs of Japan: pp. 18-19
>
International law in an imperfect world: pp. 4-9
>
International law?
refers to a widespread image whose ontological status is unclear. We don’t really know what wildmen are, whether or not they exist, or in what sense they could exist. Are they purely imaginary categories (as cultural anthropologists, historians and other practitioners of the humanities have usually supposed) or do they have a substantial grounding in empirical, or zoological, reality? What is their relation to beings that anthropologists usually call spirits, which have typically been conceived as the very opposite of the empirical? This is the abridged introductory lecture to the IIAS masterclass ‘Images of the Wildman in Southeast Asia’.
>
>
Wildman: a branch of Homo or something hairy in our subconscious? pp. 1 & 10-11
41
M
y interest in Southeast Asian wildmen was first sparked during doctoral field research some 30 years ago on Sumba, in eastern Indonesia, where I heard about a large hairy figure variously called makatoba, meu rumba or mili mongga. In particular, I was struck by the apparent similarity between this Sumbanese wildman and the sasquatch or Bigfoot, a creature I had heard much about during my previous residence in western Canada. Then, some years later, shortly after beginning further field research in the Nage region of central Flores (also in eastern Indonesia), I came across another figure, a kind of hairy hominoid called ebu gogo, which was generally similar to the Sumbanese mili mongga but different in some respects and seemingly more realistic. (For one thing, the ebu gogo were described as extinct, having been exterminated by Nage ancestors some 200 years previously. For another, Nage were able to describe the physical and behavioural features of the reputedly extinct creatures, and to do so consistently and in some detail.) From subsequent reading, I discovered that creatures similar to the wildmen of Flores and Sumba had been reported from several parts of Indonesia and main-
land Southeast Asia, and I started to think about producing a book-length comparative study. When I began I was not at all sure what form the book might eventually take. But I was interested primarily in the wildman as a cultural image and how, or how far, this sort of image could be understood symbolically, as an expression of social, ideological, or historical factors. By the same token, I did not think it would be necessary to pay too much attention to possible empirical bases of the images. But then something happened that diverted my largely cultural anthropological interests in the topic and drew them in a rather different direction. Not long after I started writing about Southeast Asian wildman figures, using the Florenese ebu gogo as my point of departure, the news broke of the discovery on Flores of Homo floresiensis. This, as we all learned in October 2004, was a new species of the genus Homo, possibly a descendant through endemic dwarfing of Homo erectus. The skeleton was a fairly elderly female who stood just over a metre high and who had a brain no larger than a chimpanzee’s. continued on page 10
>