_1HE"""G",UARD~!!!IAN!!!!o,=:Sun~da'!!'l\..!!Ma~yl5,!:!..!2!!01!!.'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _---.!KALE~~IOOSCO~~~P!..E rf\~iJ/t
49
Climate Change:
Panel Outlines Potential Of Renewable Energy By Kamal Tayo Dropo IO BO percent of the world's energy supply could be mel by rene\~bles by rlUd<~ntury Ifb.lcked by the nghl enabling pubiac policies a new repon by I h~ hll t?'lO\'e",m~nral Polnel on Climate Change {IPCC),shows.. lhe IPCe Is the leading imernational body ror tile assessmen t or c lilllat~ change. It was esta blished byth~ Unltoo Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Ol'ganiLltion (WMO) In I98B to R'Vlew olnd assess tne most r~c~1lI scielllifk, rechnlcal and socio-cconomic Information produced world\\'lde relevant to Ihe understand .. mg of climate change. It does nO( conduct any rfieareh nor does It monitor climale rel.1ttd dna. The UN General Assembly endo~ Ihe ,Iction by Wf\lO and UNEP In jointly establish· ing the IPce. Tfae Hndlngs. from over 110 re5Colrchers work· ing with the Panel,ollso Indicale that the rising ~neuatlon or rtMWable en~rgles could leold to rumul.ul\'t g~nhouse gas SiI\lIng5 equlva-lem to no to S60 GlgalOnnesor carbon diox· Id~ (GtC02eq) betw~n 2010 and 2050. The upper ~nd or the scenarios asses~, ~p resenting a cur or around a Ihird Ingreenhouse gas emiSSIons from busmus..u·usual projections. could assist In keeping concentra· lions of greenhouse gases: at 450 pans per mil· lion. Thls could cOlllribute towards a goal of holdIng the increase In global temperature beloo.v 2 degrees C~ls lus - an aim recognill-d In Ihe UllItOO Nations ClIlMle Convention's Cancun Agreemems. lhe findings. lilunchtd on Thursday, aft er being approved by m~mber counuies of the IPeCln Abu Dhab ,United Arab Emirales, ar~ contained In a summary for politymakers or the "Special RtI)Qn on Rtne\.,.able Ener~ Sources and C .mate Change Mltlgallon
G
increoOl5e of r~n~wabl es Is technkal1y and politiully vtrych.a ll enging.~ he added. Youba Sokol\Jl, who is also.a (o.(iuirof the
Working Group Ill. said: "1111: pouential rolt: of Rntwable energy technologies 10 metllng the n~ of the poor and In powenng the sustainable gro\M of d~elopinH .and dew:l· oped economIes can trigger Sll.1rply polarized views. TIlls lPee repan has brought some much needed cloJ ru y 10 lilisdel)Jlc In orde r 10 in(ann governmenls on th e options and dedo.
sions tNl will be needed If Ihe world is to col· I«dIRty (ealiLe 01 10\,.. (oarbon, far more ri"$Ource emden! dod equUable devt.lopment path..-
But [0 Ramon Pichs-Madruga, .Iso a Co<halr of the Working Group 1I1:1ne Rpon shows lhatll is not the availabIlity of the resource,
but th~ public policies that will ~Ith~r ~xpand or constrain r~newabl~ en~rgy devtlopment o\-er th~ coming decades. Oe\'t;loplngcoun· tries have an Imporunt sla~ In ihlS lutur~ this IS wher~ most of the l -l billion propl~ without acem 10 d«trklt)' li~ ~I also \\'h~rt some of the best conditions ulsl for rtnewablt ~ne.rgy d~plo)'rnent." Also spe:aklng at lh~ bunch, Ral~ndra Pachaurl, Chainnan of lh~ 1l'CC, stattd that Ihe IPCC brought 1000ether Ih ~ mOSI r~ie\'ant ilnd best available. informadon to provid~ th~ world wilh lh~ scl~ntific assessmtnt of the potemial of rene\~blten~rgy sources 10 mllig.necJlmal~ change. "The Special Rrpon an sen-e as a sound kilOW"led~~ basis for poll9"makers to ake on this malor chdllenge of lhe 21St cenrury," h~ said. The rtpon will feed into the brooderworkof the IPCe as it prepares itS Fifth Assessmem ""pon !AR5~ 111e SyntheSIS Repon Is schedu ed for finalization In 5eptember2014. The SRREN, approved by governmenl rep~ Sl'ntadves front t94 nations, Including Nigeria. has revlewro the curr~nt penetrallon of s.ix rtn~abl~ energy technolOfdes and their potential deploym~nt over ihe coming ISRREN ~ lhe sumnury Is a shon version of a roughly a deodes. The SIX renewable ~nergy technologies reviewed are: Bloenergy, Including ener· thouSolnd p.lg~ compRhenslve assessment compiltd by over 120 leading experts from oll1 gy crops; forleSt, agricultural and lI\'tstock II!:Sldues and so called s«ond gel\l!:ratlon bloover the world for IPees Working Group III fuels; Direct solar energy,lndudlng phoco"Wilh consIStent c h mal~ and energy policy volalcs ,lIld conttntratlng solar power; suppon. renewable energy sources can CODGeotht:rmaJ enelD buttfon h~olt eJltnetion tnbu~e substOlnUally (0 human \\'t1J-ht.lng by from the Eanh's Interior. Hydropower.lnclud· sustalnably supplying energy and slabillzing harness temperaruR diffe~nces in the ing run-of·rive:r,ln·stream or dam prolt'Cts th~dimate; sakllhe eo.chalr ofWorldng muine rtalm;Wind energy,lndudlng on· wilh resrrvolrs: Oc~n ~nerg}( ranging from Group 11I.I'rofessorOttmar Edenhofer, at the and offshore synems barrag~ to ocean rurrenlS and ones whkh ~pon launch. llowever, -the substantial OVer 160 ~xisting scientific scenarios on th~ ~Ulb le penetration of renewables by 2050. alongside environmental and social Implica· The findings, from over 120 researchers working wilh the tlons. have betn reviewed with four anaIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, also indicate that the rising lyud In-deplh. These four wert chosen in order 10 r~pre5Cnt the full r.mgt:. Scenarios penetralion of renewable energies could lead to cumulative greenhouse are used 10 explore possible future worlds, a n.llyzlng altematl\'t; p,uhways of socio-Kogas savings equivalent to 220 10 560 Gigalonnes of carbon ~ioxid. nomic development and technological (GtC02eq) belween 2010 and 2050 . change.
AIlS
lhe reSl'archers h.:we abosrudled lh~ challenges linked to how Rnewable energy can be Integraled Into existing and (uIUR energy sys. terns Including electricltr.grtds and likely COSt benefiu from these deve opm~nts. While the scenarios urlve olt a rangeof esti· males, the overall conduskms art lhal renewilbles willtolke an incruslng slice of Ihe energy m,uk<!. ry1{E most
optimislico( Ihe four, In-depth set'.1 llolriOS projectS renew.-.ble energy accoum· Ing (or as much as T1 percem of the world's energy demand by 2050, amoumlng to about )14 Or 407 Exa/oules perytar. As a comparison. )14 Ex.lloules S O\er thfte times the annual energy supply In lht! UnJ(ed Stales In 2005, which IS also ol slmllolr le....d of supply on the Comlnt!nl or Europe,Olccordlng to various gO\.'em mellt dnd Independent sources. SC\'t'nry-seven percent il up from JUSt underO perc.:.m ofille total pnmary energy supply or around "gO Exajoules In 2008, Each of the sctnarios IS underpinned by a rnnge of variables such as changes III energy e(flcrency, popuLa· tlon growth and per Cilpila consumption. TIltse lead to wrying levels of total primary energy supply In 2050, with the low~st of Ihe rour scenarios seelOg renewable ~nerg)' accoumlng for a shar~ or 15 pert"e.nt 102050, based on a lOtal primary energy supply of749 wjoules.. While the repon concludes that Ihe propor· tlon of renewable ~n~rgy will likely increase e\'en without enabhng policies, paSt expt'rienc~ has shown thaI th~ largtsllncreases: come with concened policy effons. Th~U h In some cases renewable en~rgy t«bnol es, according 10 expens. ar~ already econom c.allycompelflive, the r,roducoon COslS are eUITI!:mly often hlghert tan markel energy prices. However, if ellvtronmental impacl$such as emissions or poilu tams and greenhouse gases were monetized and Included In energy prices, mo~ rennvable energy technologies may become economically attractive.. For most of them, casu have d«lhltd ov~r the last dtCOldes and the authors expect signiriCant technical oldvanet.ments olOO funher COSI reductions In the future, resulting in a grealer polt!lltla l fordimatechange mitigation. Public policies that rKognlze anilll!flect the aJMT1tIJ(lI
ON PAGE 50