Mobility of e healthcare records

Mobility of e-Health Care Records Sushiladevi B. Vantamuri1, Rashmi Rachh2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering,VTU-Belagavi, 2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering,VTU-Belagavi

1

Abstract— This paper proposes a structure for Healthcare Information System (HISs) in view of enormous information investigation in portable distributed computing situations. This structure gives an interoperability, accessibility and sharing medicinal services information among social insurance suppliers, patients, and specialists. Electronic Medical records (EMRs) of patients scattered among various Care Delivery organizations (CDOs) are incorporated and put away in the cloud storage, this makes an electronic Health Records (EHRs) for every Patient. Convenient cloud permits quick internet get to and obtaining of EHRs from anyplace and whenever by means of various ways. The proposed structure utilizes huge information big data examination to discover valuable bits of knowledge that help experts take basic choices in the correct time whether he is prune to disease or not, using map reduce function. It plans lower cost, more capable human administration system.

Keywords— cloud computing, CDO, EHR, EMR, HIS I. INTRODUCTION The 21st century Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) has made the capacity to electronically store, keeps up, and move information over the world in a matter of seconds and can possibly furnish social insurance with huge expanding efficiency and nature of administrations. It will allow every supplier to have his own database of patients Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). Past investigations of the estimation of associated EMR frameworks evaluated potential effectiveness reserve funds of $77 billion every year at the 90% level of appropriation; included worth for security and wellbeing could twofold these funds. One issue in today’s EMR framework is that they are exceptionally incorporated; every Healthcare Provider (HP) has its own nearby EMR framework.

This makes wellbeing data for any patient scattered among various HPs and, along these lines, its recovery will be a test. The capacity to generally get to all patient human services data in a convenient manner is of most extreme imperative. Wellbeing data should be open and accessible to everybody required in the conveyance of patient social insurance from the specialists endeavoring to discover causes, catching gadgets, sensors, and portable applications is a noteworthy wellspring of social insurance information. Extra sources are included each day; understanding interpersonal organization correspondences in advanced structures are expanding, gathering of genomic data got to be less expensive and more therapeutic information/disclosure are being aggregated. Such enormous social insurance information is hard to prepare to investigate utilizing basic database administration instruments. Clearly, catching, putting away, looking, and breaking down medicinal services huge information to discover valuable bits of knowledge will enhance the results of the social insurance frameworks through more astute choices and will bring down human services cost too, in case, it requires proficient investigative calculations and intense figuring situations.

The upheaval in medicinal services information size is another issue in today’s life Healthcare information systems (HISs). This insurgency is not about the gigantic size of medicinal services information, however we additionally witness an exponential increment in the velocity in which this information is created and mind boggling assortments of information sort like organized, semi organized, unstructured.

@IJRTER-2016, All Rights Reserved

32

International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER) Volume 02, Issue 08; August - 2016 [ISSN: 2455-1457]

II.

PROPOSED SYSTEM

Figure 1. Block diagram of the proposed system

The proposed system shown in figure.1 is intended to achieve the following goals:  The health record of each patient is stored in the amazon cloud and thus making the data available anytime anywhere.  Patient module is designed for interaction with doctor online to ask for any prescriptions.  Admin module is designed for doing diabetic patient analysis using Naïve Bayes algorithm.  Pharmacy module is designed to accomplish billing task of patient’s medicines.  Lab handling module will update the patients various test undergone and will send an email regarding the test report to respective patient.  Doctor module is designed to study patients report and diagnose the respective patient.  Clustering of the patients healthcare data is accomplished using k-mean clustering algorithm III. EXPERIMENT AND RESULT ANALYSIS The experimental results for diabetes prediction and clustering of patients data are described below.

A. Diabetes prediction is accomplished using Naïve Bayes algorithm as defined below Training the dataset is done using the following sequence:Step 1: Reading the dataset line by line Step 2: Adding Instances of trained dataset Step 3: Modeling the trained dataset using Naïve Bayes.

Classification is done by following steps:Step 1: Splitting the trained dataset line by line with comma separation and creating new Instance.

Step 2: Setting the values of each attributes to example Step 3: Calculate probability distribution for trained dataset Step 4: Retrieve the results of the patients with diabetes or no diabetes.

@IJRTER-2016, All Rights Reserved

33

International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER) Volume 02, Issue 08; August - 2016 [ISSN: 2455-1457]

B. Clustering of patients data is done using k-mean clustering algorithm.

X={x1, x2, n} define the data point sets.

V= {v1, v2…...n} defines the set of center point.

Step 1: The cluster centers “c” are selected randomly.

Step 2: The distances each point data point are calculated.

Step 3: Cluster center which minimizes of all cluster center are assigned to the data point.

Step 4: New cluster center are re-calculated using vi= (1/ci) ci---represents data points in ith cluster.

Step 5: The distance between newly obtained clustered center and data point are recalculated.

Step 6: Stop if number of data point was resigned else repeats from step-(3) The clustering followed as per the algorithm steps will give the results as shown below

IV. CONCLUSION This paper proposes a structure for secure Healthcare information systems (HISs) in view of enormous information investigation in portable distributed computing environment. The structure gives interoperability and sharing of EHRs among human services suppliers, patients and experts.

The cloud allows a quick internet get to, sharing, and procurement of EHRs by validated clients.

Enormous information examination investigates understanding information to give right intercession to the right patient at the ideal time. The extreme objective of the proposed structure is to present another era of HISs that can give social insurance administrations of high caliber and minimal effort to the patients utilizing this blende of enormous information examination, distributed computing and versatile registering advancements.

REFERENCE: 1.

2.

3.

4.

R. Hillestad, J. bigelow, B. Chaudhry, P. dreyer, M. Greenberg, R. Meili, M. Ridgely, J. Rothenberg, and R Taylor, “Identitity crisis: An examination of the costs and benefits of unique identifier for the U.S health care system”, TR The RAND Health Corporation, 2008.

Federal information processing standards publication 197, “specification for the advanced encryption Standerds(AES)”.2001.

S. Fluhrer, I. Mantin, and A. Shamir, “Weakness key scheduling algorithm of RC4”, 8th Annual International workshop on selected Areas in cryptography, Springer-Verlog London, UK, 2001.

M. Johnson and A. Azam, “mobile One Time Passwords and RC4 encryption for Cloud computing”, Technical report, IDE 1108, March 2011.

@IJRTER-2016, All Rights Reserved

34

International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER) Volume 02, Issue 08; August - 2016 [ISSN: 2455-1457] 5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

D.Garets and M.Davis, A HIMSS Analytics White Paper, “Electronic Medical Records Vs.electronic Health Records: yes, there is a Difference”, January 26, 2006 Y. Kwak, “International Standerds for Building Electronic Health Record (EHR)”, Enterprise networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, 2005. HEALTHCOM 2005. Proceeding of 7th internation of International workshop on 23-25 june 2005.

R. Zhang and L. Liu, “Security Models and Requirements for Healthcare Application Clouds”, IEEE 3 rd international conferences on cloud computing,2010.

G. Federico, R. meili, and R. Scoville, “Extrapolating evidence of Health Information Technology Savings and Costs”, Santa monica, Calif: RAND Corporation, MG-410-HLTH,2005.

L. Vaquero,L.Rodera-Merino, J.Caceres, and M.Linder, “A Break in the clouds: Towards a cloud Defination, “ACM SIGCOMM computer communication Review, volume 39 Issue 1, Pages 50-55, January 2009.

D.C. Leonard, alexander P.pons and S.S Asfour, “Realization of a Universal Patient Identifier for Electronic Medical Records Through Biometric Technology”, IEEE transaction on information technology in biometricine, vol.13, no.

2009.

ANSI,ISO/TS 18308 Health informatics-Requirements for an Electronic Health Record architecture, ISO 2003.

Rui Zhang and Ling Liu College of computing, Georgia Institute of technology, Atlanta, GA, USA “Security Models and Requirements for Healthcare Application Clouds.

Yang Xie, Gunter Schreier, David C.W. Chang, Sandra Neubauer, Ying Liu, Stephen Redmond and Nigel H.Lovell, “predicting Days in Hospital Using Health Insurance Claims” J. Sun and C.K Reddy, “ Big Data Analytics for HealthCare” Tutorial presentation at the SIAM international conference on Data Mining, Austin, TX, 2013.

@IJRTER-2016, All Rights Reserved

35