International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015), e-ISSN: 2455-2585 Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017
FENDER SYSTEMS AND THEIR AFFECT ON BERTHING STRUCTURES WITH SPECIAL MENTION TO IS:4651, BS:6349 AND PIANC GUIDELINES Santosh R. Chaurasiya1, Dr.A.A.Bage2, Dr.V.S.Joshi3 1 2
Structural Engineering department, Sardar Patel College of Engineering, Structural Engineering department, Sardar Patel College of Engineering, 3 Afcons Infrastruture Limited,
Abstract—Water transport is the cheapest and the oldest mode of transport. It operates on a natural track and hence does not require huge capital investment in the construction and maintenance of its track except in case of canals. During the last decades ships have grown larger and larger and the draft of the ship has also increased. Up to now, reliable, theoretically founded design criteria are hardly available. The lack of good design criteria is the prime reason for making researches into the possibilities of an experimental and theoretical determination of berthing forces. A jetty, two design vessels and four different types of fender systems are taken into consideration. The Berthing Energy is evaluated using IS:4651, BS:6349 and PIANC “Guidelines for Design of Fender Systems, 2002” for the largest and smallest vessel. The minimum Berthing Energy from the design vessels is obtained by using the three codes. Using the minimum Energy, the reactions developed for various fender systems is obtained. Based on those values, the fender system best suited for the jetty is found. Using those values, the Jetty is analysed and the Bending Moments developed in the structure for four fenders are considered. For modelling of jetty, STAAD.Pro is used. Keywords: Berthing Energy, Reactions, Fender System, Bending Moments, STAAD.Pro. I.
INTRODUCTION
Water transport has the largest carrying capacity and is most suitable for carrying bulky goods over long distances. It has played a very significant role in bringing different parts of the world closer and is indispensable to foreign trade. Ports, terminals and harbours play a key role in the shipment of goods around the globe. There are two types of water transport viz. Inland water transport and Ocean-transport. In the late fifties, conditions suddenly changed. Not only did the draft of ships double in less than twenty years, but the mass increased ten times more from a maximum of 50,000 tons to 5,00,000 tons. Now the new ships required deeper water so that they could be berthed. Not all the ports all over the world facilitate berthing of larger ships. In such cases the larger ship halt at a distance of certain nautical miles from the shore in the sea or ocean and the cargo or the goods are unloaded into smaller ships also known as barges which carry the cargo to the coast. This operation may be economical depending upon many factors like the material which is transported, cost of navigation using barges, etc. Now these small ships are berthed at the port and goods are unloaded from the barges. For ports with deep waters the larger ships are directly berthed at the ports. Berths should accommodate the largest design ships, but they must also cater for small and intermediate ships. Generally a berthing facility consists of one or more elastic elements (fenders) attached to a rigid structure (finger pier, caisson-type jetty, quay-wall, etc.). The fenders absorb the berthing forces and form a protection for ship and berthing structure. As the maximum permissible berthing force against the side of e.g. a mammoth tanker is distinctly lower than what is acceptable for the berthing structure, the ship is therefore the prevailing factor for fender design. They are first and foremost a safety barrier to protect people, ships and structures. Most fender systems use elastomeric (rubber) units, air or special foams which act as springs to absorb the ship’s kinetic energy The phenomenon occurring during the berthing manoeuvre of a ship are complicated and the fender loads are influenced by a lot of parameters: the configuration of the berthing site, the geometry and the rigidity or hull of the ship, the mechanical properties of the fenders, the speed of approach, the forces exerted by tugs, wind, current and waves, the mode of motion, the keel clearance.
II. CODAL PROVISIONS A. As per IS: 4651 (Part III) - 1974 When an approaching vessel strikes a berth, a horizontal force acts on the berth. The magnitude of this force depends on the kinetic energy that can be absorbed by the fendering system. The reaction force for which the berth is to be designed
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
70
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) can be obtained and deflection-reaction diagrams of the fendering system chosen. The kinetic energy imparted to a fendering system, by a vessel moving with velocity v m/s is given by: Berthing Energy E =
đ?‘Šđ??ˇ ∗ đ?‘‰ 2 2đ?‘”
∗ đ??śđ?‘š ∗ đ??śđ?‘’ ∗ đ??śđ?‘
where WD is displacement tonnage (DT) of the vessel in tones V is the approach velocity of the vessel in m/s, normal to the berth Cm is the mass co-efficient Cs is the softness co-efficient Ce is the eccentricity co-efficient B. As per BS: 6349 (Part IV) - 1994 Berthing Energy, E = 0.5 ∗ CM ∗ đ?‘€đ??ˇ ∗ đ??śđ??¸ ∗ đ??śđ?‘† ∗ đ??śđ??ś ∗ đ?‘‰đ??ľ 2 where CM is the hydrodynamic mass coefficient MD is the displacement of the ship (in t) VB is the velocity of the vessel normal to the berth (in m/s) CE is the eccentricity coefficient CS is the softness coefficient CC is the berth configuration coefficient C. PIANCâ€? Guidelines for Design of Fender Systems, 2002â€? For the energy calculation the displacement of a vessel is required. The displacement tonnage (M) of a vessel is the total mass of the vessel and can be calculated from the volume of water displaced multiplied by the water density. In most case the vessel's fully loaded displacement is used in the fender design. The kinetic energy of the moving vessel may be calculated as : E = 0.5*M*V2 where E is the kinetic energy of the vessel itself (kNm) M is the mass of vessel (water displacement) in tonnes V is the speed of the approaching vessel perpendicular to the berth in m/s The design energy that has to be absorbed by the fender can be calculated as: Ed = 0.5*M*V2*Ce*Cm*Cs*Cc where Ed is the design energy (under normal conditions) to be absorbed by Fender System (in kNm) M is the mass of the design vessel (displacement in tonnes) at chosen confidence level. Usually 95% confidence level V is the approach velocity of the vessel perpendicular to the berth in m/s Ce is the eccentricity factor Cm is the virtual mass factor Cs is the softness factor Cc is the berth configuration factor or cushion factor III.
NUMERICAL STUDY AND MODELLING OF JETTY
A. Design Vessels The design vessel sizes range and characteristics to be considered for design of jetty are as follows :
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
71
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) TABLE I DETAILS OF THE DESIGN VESSELS Vessel Type Maximum Ship Size Minimum Ship Size
DWT 2000 200
LOA(m) 80 18
Beam(m) 11 5
Loaded Draft(m) 3.50 1.00
Calculation of Berthing Energy Vessel Characteristics Type of the Vessel : Other Dead Weight Tonnage (DWT) : 2000 ton Displacement Tonnage (WD) : 2520 ton Length (LBP) : 80 m Length (LOA) : 80 m Draught of the vessel (D) : 3.5 m Beam width (B) : 11 m Constants Acceleration due to gravity (g) : 9.81 m/s2 Unit weight of sea water (w) : 1.03 t/m3 Berthing Conditions Type of Berthing : Quarter point berthing Berthing Condition : Moderate wind and swell Berthing Velocity or approach velocity (V) : 0.25 m/s Vessel approach angle : 100 Berthing Structure Berthing structure comprises of 36 m long Ă— 18 m wide jetty supported on bored cast In-situ piles with superstructure comprising of longitudinal and transverse beams supporting the Deck slab. Finished deck level shall be maintained at RL +16.0 m. Piles are provided at spacing of 6 m c/c in longitudinal direction. Along Transverse direction, 4 piles are provided at spacing of 6 m c/c. The ground level is at RL +4.0 m. The beams are of size 1 m x 1 m and the piles are circular piles of diameter 1 m. The jetty is modelled in STAAD.Pro software.
Fig. 1 Isometric view of the Jetty
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
72
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) The structure is loaded in the transverse direction as a nodal load at the deck level at the last node. The value of the load is the reaction developed by the specified fender. The same node is loaded in the longitudinal direction 25% of the load in the other direction. Then the analysis is carried out.
Fig. 2 Load case 1
Fig. 3 Load case 2 IV.
RESULTS
A. Calculation of Berthing Energy as per IS : 4651 As per IS : 4651 ( Part III ) – 1974 Calculations for Coefficients 
Mass Coefficient (Cm)
if DWT<=20000, Cm = 1+
2D B
where D is the Draught of the Vessel in m and B is the Beam Width in m.
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
73
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) if DWT>20000, Cm = 1+
đ?&#x153;&#x2039; â&#x2C6;&#x2014;đ??żâ&#x2C6;&#x2014;đ?&#x2018;¤ â&#x2C6;&#x2014;đ??ˇ 2 4
đ?&#x2018;&#x160;đ??ˇ
Since DWT = 2000 DWT Cm = 1.6363 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Eccentricity Coefficient (Ce)
Ce =
1+(l/r)2 sin 2 θ 1+(l/r)2
l = dist from CG of the vessel to the point of contact projected along the waterline of the berth = 18.74 m r = radius of gyration of the rotational radius on the plane of the vessel = 20.74 m Ce = 0.5641 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Softness Coefficient (Cs) = 0.9
Berthing Energy, E =
đ?&#x2018;&#x160;đ??ˇ â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ?&#x2018;&#x2030; 2 2đ?&#x2018;&#x201D;
â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x161; â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x2019; â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ?&#x2018;
E = 6.668 ton m Factor of safety = 2 Manufacturer Tolerance = 10% Berthing energy = 143.933 kNm Considering 2.5 m as vessel contact length, Berthing Energy to be absorbed = 57.6 kNm/m B. Calculation of Berthing Energy as per BS : 6349 As per BS : 6349 ( Part IV ) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 1994 Calculations for Coefficients ď&#x201A;ˇ
Hydrodynamic Mass Coefficient (CM)
CM = 1+
2D B
where D is the Draught of the Vessel in m and B is the Beam Width in m. CM = 1.6363 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Eccentricity Coefficient (CE)
CE =
K 2 +R 2 cos 2 Îł K 2 +R 2
Where K is the radius of gyration of the ship and may be calculated from the formula: K = (0.19Cb + 0.11) L where L is the length of the hull between perpendiculars in m = 80 m Cb is the block coefficient Cb = (length
displacement of hull between perp endiculars Ă&#x2014; beam Ă&#x2014; draught Ă&#x2014; density of water )
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
2520
= 80â&#x2C6;&#x2014;11â&#x2C6;&#x2014;3.5â&#x2C6;&#x2014;1.03 = 0.7943
74
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) K = (0.19*0.7943 + 0.11) * 80 = 20.874 R is the distance of the point of contact from the centre of mass in m =
đ??ľ
y 2 + ( 2 )2 =
11
202 + ( 2 )2 = 20.742 m
Îł is the angle between the line joining the point of contact to the centre of mass and the velocity vector = 25.376° CE = 0.9087 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Softness Coefficient (Cs) = 0.9
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Berth Configuration Coefficient (CC) = 1.0
Berthing Energy, E = 0.5 â&#x2C6;&#x2014; CM â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ??ˇ â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ??¸ â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x2020; â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ??śđ??ś â&#x2C6;&#x2014; đ?&#x2018;&#x2030;đ??ľ 2 E = 105.394 kNm Factor of safety = 2 Manufacturer Tolerance = 10% Berthing energy = 231.867 kNm Considering 2.5 m as vessel contact length, Berthing Energy to be absorbed = 92.747 kNm/m C. Calculation of Berthing Energy as PIANC "Guidelines for the design of fender systems, 2002" Calculations for Coefficients ď&#x201A;ˇ
Hydrodynamic Mass Coefficient (CM) CM = 1+
2D B
where D is the Draught of the Vessel in m and B is the Beam Width in m. CM = 1.6363 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Eccentricity Coefficient (CE) Ce =
đ??ž 2 +đ?&#x2018;&#x2026; 2 â&#x2C6;&#x2014;đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x201A;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020; 2 ɸ đ??ž 2 +đ?&#x2018;&#x2026; 2
Where K is the radius of gyration of the ship and may be calculated from the formula: K = (0.19Cb + 0.11) L where L is the length of the hull between perpendiculars in m = 80 m Cb is the block coefficient M
2520
Cb = Lâ&#x2C6;&#x2014;Bâ&#x2C6;&#x2014;Dâ&#x2C6;&#x2014;Ď = 80â&#x2C6;&#x2014;11â&#x2C6;&#x2014;3.5â&#x2C6;&#x2014;1.025 = 0.798 K = (0.19*0.7943 + 0.11) * 80 = 20.933 R is the distance of the point of contact from the centre of mass in m =
đ??ľ
y 2 + ( 2 )2 =
11
202 + ( 2 )2 = 20.742 m
ɸ is the angle between the line joining the point of contact to the centre of mass and the velocity vector = 25.376° CE = 0.909 ď&#x201A;ˇ
Softness Coefficient (Cs) = 1.0
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
75
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015)
Berth Configuration Coefficient (CC) = 1.0
Berthing Energy, E = 0.5*M*V2*Ce*Cm*Cs*Cc E = 117.138 kNm Factor of safety = 2 Manufacturer Tolerance = 10% Berthing energy = 257.704 kNm Considering 2.5 m as vessel contact length, Berthing Energy to be absorbed = 103.082 kNm/m
TABLE II BERTHING ENERGY FOR THE VESSEL USING IS CODE, BS CODE AND PIANC “GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF FENDER SYSTEMS, 2002"
Berthing Energy(kNm) Reaction on Fender(kNm/m) Abnormal Berthing Energy(kNm)
IS: 4651
BS: 6349
PIANC
65.424
105.394
117.138
57.6
92.747
103.082
143.933
231.867
257.704
For the Berthing Energy obtained by IS Code, the Reaction has been calculated using Trellborg Marine Systems Catalogue. TABLE III BERTHING ENERGY AND REACTION FOR DIFFERENT TYPE OF FENDERS
Fender Type
Cell Fender
Super Arch Fender
Super Cone Fender
Unit Element
Berthing Energy (kNm)
144
154
148
146
Reaction force (kN)
409
457
352
316
Reaction (kN)
500
400 300 200 100 0 Cell Fender
Super Arch Fender
Super cone Fender
Unit Element
Type of Fender Fig. 4 Variation in Reaction forces for different Fenders
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
76
Berthing Energy absorbed (kNm)
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015)
160 120 80 40 0 Cell Fender
Super Arch Fender
Super Cone Fender
Unit Element
Type of Fender Fig. 5 Variation in Berthing Energy for different Fenders 400
Moment (kNm)
350 300 250 200 150
My(Positive)
100
My(Negative)
50 0 Cell Fender
Superarch Fender
Supercone Unit Element Fender
Type of Fender Fig. 6 Variation in Moments developed for different Fenders 350 Moment (kNm)
300 250 200 150 Mz(Positive)
100
Mz(Negative)
50 0
Cell Fender
Superarch Fender
Supercone Unit Element Fender
Type of Fender Fig. 7 Variation in Moments developed for different Fenders
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
77
International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES) Volume 3, Issue 07, July-2017, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 3.45 (SJIF-2015) V.
CONCLUSION
Following conclusions were taken from results obtained as above:
The Berthing Energy obtained by BS Code and PIANC Guidelines give more conservative values as compared to IS Code. The value as per BS Code gives 61.1% greater value than IS Code and PIANC gives value of 79% greater than as per IS Code. However, the difference in values obtained by BS Code and PIANC is less as compared to IS Code. The Berthing Energy obtained by using PIANC Guidelines is 11.14% more than value obtained using BS Code. The reaction developed is minimum for Unit element Fender, thus the moments developed in piles will be minimum for this Fender and the reinforcement will also be minimum. The Bending Moment developed in the structure is minimum for the Unit Element Fender, thus it can be concluded that for the Jetty installed with Unit element Fender can be designed economically. REFERENCES
LIST OF CODES 1. 2. 3.
IS: 4651 Part 3-1974,” Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours”, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). BS: 6349 Part 4-1994,” Code of practice for design of fendering and mooring systems”, British Standards Institution. PIANC “Guidelines for the design of Fender System-2002.”
LIST OF CATALOGUES 1.
Trellborg Marine Systems
IJTIMES-2017@All rights reserved
78