Implants/ dental implant courses by Indian dental academy

Page 1

IMPLANTS IN ORTHODONTICS

www.indiandentalacademy.com


INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY Leader in continuing dental education www.indiandentalacademy.com

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Introduction  Classification of Implants  Material used for Implants  Osseointegration  Use of Implants in Orthodontics

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Linkow- Father of oral Implantology.

 Implants are defined as alloplastic devices which are surgically inserted into or onto the jaw bone-Boucher.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Classification of Implants. Based on their location: Subperiosteal

 Transosseous

 Endosseous

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Classification of Implants  According to their body geometry:-

-Threaded or Non threaded

-Porous or non porous

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Materials used for Implants  In 16 &17th century –Ivory dental implants .  20th century-Metal Implant devices.  1940 &1960’s-CoCrMo subperiosteal & titanium blade implants.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 1970’s-Non metal biomaterials

 1982-Branemark Implant.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Stainless steel:-18% Cr & 8% Ni -surface passivation is required -subjected to crevice & pitting corrosion.

 Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy :-used in fabrication of custom designs such as subperiosteal frames. www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Titanium:-exist in 3 forms -Alpha -Beta -Alpha-Beta phase (most commonly used). Ti-6Al-4V  Modulus of elasticity is equal to bone.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Titanium:“Passivity”. •

Metal with surface coatings Hydroxyapatite

Tricalcium phosphate.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Ceramics:Bioglass-contain oxides of Ca, Na, Si.  Polymers & Composites.  Other Implant Materials like Gold, Palladium, Tantalum, Platinum, Zirconium. www.indiandentalacademy.com


OSSEOINTEGRATION.  Term & concept of Osseointegration -Branemark. “An intimate structural contact at the implant surface and adjacent vital bone devoid of any intervening fibrous tissue.” www.indiandentalacademy.com


Evolution of the concept of osseointegration  Vital microscopic studies of the rabbit fibulatitanium chambered microscopes.  Series of experiments:-Titanium fixtures for immobilization of autologous bone grafts. - Tooth implants studies for healing & anchorage stability. www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Study done on dogs to find out the load bearing capacity of implants.

Optical titanium chambers were implanted in humans-to assess the tissue reactions of titanium implants.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Biology of osseointegration. Hematoma

Callus formation

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Bone remodeling

Fibrous tissue

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Principles of osseointegration Factors important for reliable bone anchorage of an Implanted device. Implant biocompatibility:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Principles of osseointegration.  Implant Design:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com




Implant surface:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 State of the host bed:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Surgical technique:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Loading condition:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Use of Implants in Orthodontics ďƒ˜

Growth Studies.

ďƒ˜

Anchorage Orthodontic

Orthopaedic -Maxillary protraction

-Maxillary expansion

-Space closure

-Intrusion -Molar distalization

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Growth Studies: Implants are the best means of reference points for studying the longitudinal growth studies.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Growth Rotations -Bjork & skeiller .

 Growth of Cleft lip & palate patients - Shaw

. www.indiandentalacademy.com


ANCHORAGE:

Orthopeadic correction-

Two methods for obtaining the Skeletal anchorage:

Intentionally Ankylosed teeth.

Endosseous Implants.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Maxillary Expansion:-

- Guyman(1980)

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Linkow-pioneer in the use of Implants in Orthodontics.  Pt’s with one or more missing teeth.  Loss of teeth during the course of orthodontic treatment.  Pt’s with CL-II malocclusion & missing lower posterior teeth.  Periodontally compromised teeth.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Anchorage for orthodontic purpose.

Skeletal Anchorage:-Creekmoore(1983) -Vitallium bone screw placed below the anterior nasal spine is used for intrusion of Upper anteriors. -6mm of upper incisor intrusion was seen after one year.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Endosseous Implants for maxillary protraction -Smalley etal (1988)

• A traction force of 600gm is used and protraction was done till 8mm of anterior displacement of maxillary complex occurred. www.indiandentalacademy.com


Use of Endosseous Implant for closure of extraction site -Eugene Roberts (1989)

 Endosseous Implants placed in the retromolar region are used to close the atrophic extraction site.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Impacted Titanium Post for Anchorage -Frederic Bousquet etal(1996)

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Mini-Implant for Orthodontic Anchorage:-Ryuzo Kanomi(1997)

 Mini-Implant is 1.2mm in diameter and 6mm in length.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Mini-Implants for space closure.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Mini-Implants for molar intrusion

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Skeletal Anchorage system for Open bite correction -Umemori , Sugawara etal (1999)

• Control of vertical dimension is

very important in correction of anterior open bite •‘L’ shaped titanium miniplates are used as a Source of anchorage for intruding the molars.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Procedure for miniplate insertion:-

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Onplant & Ortho-Implant.  Onplant:-Block &Hoffman.  It is a flat disk shaped fixture available in 8 and 10mm in diameter  It has a HA coated surface for integration with the surrounding bone.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Ortho-Implant - Celenza

& Hochman

•Similar to onplant but it is an endosseous Implant. •Its surface is sandblasted and etched to increase the adhesion to the surrounding bone

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Micro Implant  Dimension of micro implant are 1.2mm in diameter & 6mm in length.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


Micro-Implant for anchorage in Lingual orthodontics

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


MAGNETS IN ORTHODONTICS

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Introduction  Types of magnetic materials  Properties of magnets  Application of magnets in orthodontics. www.indiandentalacademy.com


 In 1953, magnets were first used for denture retention by BEHRAN & EGAN.

 Use of magnets in orthodontic- BLECHMAN & SMILEY.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


PROPERTIES OF MAGNETS

 Flux Density

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 In dentistry, ferromagnetic materials with static field are used.  Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy.  Coercivity.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Coulombs law:-This law states that force between two magnetic poles is directly proportional to magnitude & inversely proportional to square of the distance between them.  Curie point:-Pierre Curie(1859-1906)

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 High force to volume ratio.

 Maximal force at shorter distances.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 No interruption of magnetic force lines by intermediate media.  No friction in attractive force configuration.

 No energy loss.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


TYPES OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS      

Platinum-cobalt(Pt-co) Aluminium-Nickel-Cobalt(Al-Ni-Co) Ferrite Chromium-cobalt-Iron Samarium Cobalt(SmCo) Neodymium-Iron-Boron(Nd2Fe B) 14

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 SAMARIUM-COBALT (SmCo5&Sm2Co17) MAGNETS:-

-high resistance to demagnetization.

-corrosion resistance.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Advantages:-Continuous force is exerted. - Eliminates the patient co-operation. -No friction.  Disadvantages:-Tarnish &corrosion products are cytotoxic. -Cost factor

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Biological effect of magnetic forces:-

Aronson:-thinning of epithelium under attracting & repelling magnets. McDonald - proliferative activity of fibroblasts in presence of static magnetic field Lars Bondemark & Kurol studied changes in human dental pulp and gingival tissue. www.indiandentalacademy.com


APPLICATIONS OF MAGNETIC APPLIANCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Tooth intrusion Expansion Tooth Impaction Space closure Molar distalization Magnetic Edgewise brackets

7. 8.

Functional Appliances. Retainers.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Tooth Intrusion:Active Vertical Corrector-Dellinger(1986) -Samarium cobalt magnets in the repelling mode are used.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Fixed Magnetic Appliance:-introduced by VARUN KALRA & CHARLES BURSTONE.

Appliance consists of an upper &lower acrylic splints with samarium cobalt magnets in stainless steel casting embedded in a repelling mode.

www.indiandentalacademy.com




EXPANSION:-Vardimon et al(1987) demonstrated palatal expansion using two types of magnetic devices in Macaca fascicularis monkeys. -Tooth borne appliance

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Tissue borne appliance (attached directly to palate by endosseous pins).

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Tooth Impaction:- Vardimon,Graber,Drescher -Neodymium Iron Boron magnets can be used to assist eruption of an impacted canine.  Mancini(1996)-force levels are sufficient enough to induce the cellular &biochemical changes are required to produce orthodontic tooth movement.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


space closure -simple tooth movement without archwires :-Muller(1984) -Complex Intra &Interarch Mechanics:-Blechman(1985)

CL-II mechanics with a magnetic force system in a CL-I extraction case

www.indiandentalacademy.com


3 magnet configuration to enhance CL-II mechanics

3 magnet configuration used to simultaneously move all 4 canines distally www.indiandentalacademy.com


CL-II mechanics using magnetic force system in CL-II extraction case.

Repulsive CL-II mechanics in CL-II Nonextraction cases.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Molar Distalization. -Gianelly et al(1989):-repelling magnets in conjuntion with a modified Nance appliance was used. -Bondemark & Kurol:-repelling samarium cobalt magnets were used for distalization.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Magnetic Edgewise Brackets:-Kawata(1987) -Samarium cobalt magnet with an edgewise bracket (o.018slot) .

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Functional Orthopaedic Magnetic Appliances:Vardimon(1989) -for correction of CL-II&CL-III malocclusion.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Magnetic Twin Block:Clark(1996) -Samarium cobalt magnets were embedded in the inclined surface of the twin block in attractive mode.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Magnetic Activator Device(MAD):-Darendilier (1993) developed this magnetically active functional appliance. MAD I-mandibular deviations MAD II-CLII malocclusion MADIII-CLIII malocclusion MADIV-skeletal open bite correction.

MAD-II

www.indiandentalacademy.com


MAD-II FOR CORRECTION OF CL-II,DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION.

Deep Bite

open Bite

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 MAD III

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


 MAD - IV

www.indiandentalacademy.com


MAD IV(a)

MAD IV( b)

MAD IV( c)

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Treatment of CL-II bimax with magnetsDarendelier&Joho(199 2) -Autonomous fixed magnetic appliance.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Propellant Unilateral Magnetic Appliance (PUMA) - Chate(1995) Magnets are use to stimulate costo-chondral bone graft in Hemi facial microsomia.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Retainers:-Springate & Sandler(1991) -micro magnets made of neodymium iron boron magnets as a fixed retainer in a patient with persistent diastema.

www.indiandentalacademy.com


 Bibiliography:-

-Dentofacial Orthopedics with functional appliances-T.M Graber, Rakosi,Petrovic. -

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Thank you www.indiandentalacademy.com Leader in continuing dental education

www.indiandentalacademy.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.