INFORMAL URBAN PRACTICE
1. articulate your aspirations for the studio and propose a means for self-assessment
Student name: Rahul Pereira What do you aspire to learn through the studio? Clearly propose the most important 6 or more aspects of learning and achievement (in few words) that you aspire to measure your work against.
What is likely to indicate different levels of your performance and achievement against each criteria? Describe in detail the indicators (evidence) of quality at the level of performance that you aspire to achieve. In less detail, describe what will indicate if you have achieved above or below your aspired level.
CRITERIA
‘SATISFACTORY’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
‘GOOD’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
‘VERY GOOD’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
‘OUTSTANDING’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
1
IDEA TESTING IN PUBLIC DOMAIN
Showed adequate evidence of experiments conducted in public
Showed good amount of evidence of experiments conducted in public
Showed great evidence and documentation of experiments conducted in public domain.
Showed exceptional and well refined evidence and documentation of the experiments conducted.
2
DESIGN FOR SOCIAL PROVOCATION
Design did not receive enough of feedback from the public
Design received good amount of feedback and response from the public
Design received great amount of feedback and responses from the public
Design received exceptional amount of positive feedback and responses from the public
3
DESIGNING ATMOSPHERES IN PUBLIC SPACES
Design did not create the desired mood suited for the space
Design created the desired mood suited for the space
Design created a great atmosphere for the space it was put in and was successful in drawing in people to the space.
Design created an exceptional atmosphere for the space it was put in and was highly successful in drawing in people to the space
4
DOCUMENTING PUBLIC BEHAVIOUR
Showed adequate documentation of public in given space
Showed good amount of documentation of public in given space
Showed great amount of documentation and understanding of public behaviour in the space.
Showed exceptional amount of documentation and understanding of public behaviour in the space.
5
COLLABORATIVE IDEA GENERATION
Showed poor collaborative skills with other team mates
Showed good collaborative skills with other team mates
6
TESTING DESIGN SYSTEMS WITH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Showed adequate evidence of public interaction with the design
Showed good amount of evidence of public interaction with the design
Showed great collaborative skills and team work and was great in proposing ideas and the execution of them Showed great amount of evidence of public interaction with the design and was great in linking the public to the design.
Showed exceptional collaborative skills and team work and was fluent in proposing ideas and the execution of them Showed exceptional amount of evidence of public interaction with the design and was highly successful in linking the public to the design
etc
INFORMAL URBAN PRACTICE
2.
Mid-semester self-assessment
Student name: Rahul Pereira Import the above criteria
CRITERIA
What indicates the current levels of your performance and achievement in the studio against each criteria? Describe in detail the indicators (evidence) of quality at the level of performance you honestly believe you have achieved so far. In less detail, describe what would indicate if you had achieved above or below your proposed level. ‘SATISFACTORY’ ‘GOOD’ ‘VERY GOOD’ ‘OUTSTANDING’ PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDICATORS INDICATORS INDICATORS I have been good in testing the various interventions in public, and has got vital information for the project ahead. I have been successful in provoking the public and drawing them in to give their opinion on the projects undertaken.
1
IDEA TESTING IN PUBLIC DOMAIN
2
DESIGN FOR SOCIAL PROVOCATION
3
DESIGNING ATMOSPHERES IN PUBLIC SPACES
I need to push this idea of creating atmosphere in space a lot more. I am hoping to achieve this in my final project with my group.
4
DOCUMENTING PUBLIC BEHAVIOUR
I have been good in recording the publics response and reaction to my various interventions through different forms of media.
5
COLLABORATIVE IDEA GENERATION
The formation of the final and various mini projects has been a fusion of different ideas thrown out by me and my group.
6
TESTING DESIGN SYSTEMS WITH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
I have been good in involving the public in my interventions and was able to get information with one on one encounters with them.
etc
CRITERIA RELEVANT UP TO MID SEMESTER ONLY List criteria (if any) that you believe only relates to your work up to mid-semester.
1 2