INFORMAL URBAN PRACTICE
1. articulate your aspirations for the studio and propose a means for self-assessment
Student name: Ivan Hooi Eu Vern What do you aspire to learn through the studio? Clearly propose the most important 6 or more aspects of learning and achievement (in few words) that you aspire to measure your work against.
What is likely to indicate different levels of your performance and achievement against each criteria? Describe in detail the indicators (evidence) of quality at the level of performance that you aspire to achieve. In less detail, describe what will indicate if you have achieved above or below your aspired level.
CRITERIA
‘SATISFACTORY’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Design contents just merely achieved satisfactory level, needs improvement in speculating design contents.
1 Design Contents
2 Critical Thinking
3
Shows effort in providing critical thoughts in a satisfactory level. Evidence needed.
Technical Understanding (2D / 3D)
Provide adequate information in understanding technical component.
Project Directions
Provide information of project directions; but are not clearly stated out.
Presentation Layout (Communication)
An unsatisfying layout, hard to read and understand intentions of project.
Project Outcome / intentions
An unclear intention on project outcome; need more involvement with project.
4
5
6
‘GOOD’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Design contents are in a good understanding manner, there are still unclear parts to define design intentions. Good ability shows in critical thoughts with higher standards; more thoughts and evidence of involvement needed. Provide and show evidence of understanding technical component. Provide project directions; there are still a lot of misleading directions towards project. Shows a minimal thought on using presentation format in communication.
A good intention on project outcome; need involvement with project; there are a lot of room for improvement.
‘VERY GOOD’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Design contents are in a very good understanding manner, there are rooms for defining design intentions. Provide enough evidence of critical thoughts, and nearly succeeded in engaging thoughts. Presented a good command in using technical component involvement in relations to the project. Clearly stated out project directions, there are still couple of misleading directions. Shows a good thought in how presentation layout assists in communicating the project. A very good intention on project outcome; there are still rooms of unclear outcome/ intentions.
‘OUTSTANDING’ PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Design contents are in an excellent understanding manner, well established and clearly pointed out design intentions. Provide enough evidence of critical thoughts, and succeeded in engaging thoughts. Presented a well established command for technical component involvement in relations to the project. Clearly stated out project directions and provide outstanding information. Outstanding thought in how presentation layout assists in communicating the project; easy understanding from presentation layout itself. Excellent intention on project outcome; project clearly stated out in relevant to your project intentions.
INFORMAL URBAN PRACTICE
2.
Mid-semester self-assessment
Student name: Ivan Hooi Eu Vern Import the above criteria
CRITERIA
1 Design Contents
2 Critical Thinking
3 Technical Understanding (2D / 3D)
4 Project Directions
5 Presentation Layout (Communication)
6 Project Outcome / intentions
What indicates the current levels of your performance and achievement in the studio against each criteria? Describe in detail the indicators (evidence) of quality at the level of performance you honestly believe you have achieved so far. In less detail, describe what would indicate if you had achieved above or below your proposed level. ‘SATISFACTORY’ ‘GOOD’ ‘VERY GOOD’ ‘OUTSTANDING’ PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDICATORS INDICATORS INDICATORS Design contents has developed in a good understanding manner, numbers of idea has been taken in to account of interest. Critical analysis has been proven with past IUP, created relevant information for major projects development. I have gained knowledge from technology class, and had built a 3D structure using the application we are exposed to. I have converse my project direction in a clearly stated stage. Will explore more and cooperate with my group project in how to convey it in a better exploration ways. My presentation layout has been produced in a clear-cut manner, and provides sufficient information to help in communicating. More relevant information might help in developing my Presentation Layout. For the past projects that I did, the outcome of each
project has gained me sufficient ideas in relevant with what IUP is, and will keep researching from the resources of each project. etc
CRITERIA RELEVANT UP TO MID SEMESTER ONLY List criteria (if any) that you believe only relates to your work up to mid-semester.
1 2