Prospective Study for the Assessment of Recurrence Risk in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients

Page 1

The PARSC Trial, a Prospective Study for the Assessment of Recurrence Risk in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients Using ColoPrint 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 R. Salazar , R. Rosenberg , M. Lutke Holzik , J. Marshall , J. J. M. Van Der Hoeven , B. Glimelius , F. Bibeau , L. Stork-Sloots , R.A. Bender , and J. Capdevila

1Institut Catala d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain, 2Klinikum rechts der Isar,Technische University Munich, Munich, Germany; 3Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; 4Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; 5Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands; 6 8 7 9 Akademiska University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; CRLC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands and Irvine, CA; Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Introduction

Schematic overview of prospective study

• Clinical trials have not yet shown convincingly if adjuvant chemotherapy is justified for stage II colon cancer patients, of whom 25% are at risk of recurrence. • An 18-gene expression profile, ColoPrint, has been developed for identifying colon cancer patients more likely to develop recurrent disease and who would be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. • The gene signature has been validated in independent cohorts of colon cancer patients (540 patients in validation studies and 322 in- silico)1,2.

Patient Information & Informed Consent

• Retrospective clinical studies showed that ColoPrint is able to predict recurrence of colon cancer in stage II patients independent of clinical factors.

2Rosenberg et al ASCO GI Symposium 2011 (abstract 358)

ColoPrint analysis

Year 1 Year 3 Year 5

Objectives

Training

HR = 3.6 (p=0.01); 5-year DMFS* Low risk (63% of patients) 91% (95% CI, 84-98%) High risk (37% of patients) 72% (95% CI, 58-88%)

Selection of final

Low risk

18-gene set & algorithm High risk

Standardization and validation

Validation of 18-gene profile

of analytical methods

Clinical validation study II (stage II-III); Munich hospital (n=233) (2) HR 1.8 (p=0.057) all stages; HR 4.13 (p=0.009) stage II

CRF 2 - 4

• Treatment is at the discretion of the physician, adhering to NCCN approved regimens or a recognized alternative. • ColoPrint result will not immediately be communicated to physician/patient (after enrollment has been completed).

• • • • •

Age ≥ 18 years. Adenocarcinoma of the colon. Stage II disease. Fresh tumor sample available. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria • • •

Prior malignancy (with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or cervical dysplasia). Any neo-adjuvant therapy. Synchronous tumors.

Patient information stage II (preliminary analysis of eligible and analyzable completed data)

Stage II

Validation study I, stage II (n=115)

Whole genome array

In-silico validation study (stage I-III); public datasets (n=322) HR = 2.8 (p<0.001) all stages

If eligible: CRF1

PARSC sample status to-date

Overview of ColoPrint development

Clinical validation study I (stage I-III); ICO Barcelona (n=208) (1) HR = 3.1 (P=0.001) all stages; HR = 3.27 (p=0.015) stage II

Quality check sample

Inclusion criteria

• Enrollment of 600 stage II patients.

± 4 weeks after surgery

RNARetain Sample Agendia

1Salazar et al. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(1):17-24.

Training set (stage I-IV) Dutch hospitals (n=188) (1) HR = 3.41 (P< 0.0001)

Surgery

Treatment at discretion of investigator

Study design

1. To validate the power of risk assessment, and to compare the performance of ColoPrint vs the clinical risk assessment in estimating 3-year relapse rate in stage II colon cancer patients. 2. To assess the feasibility of using the ColoPrint test in clinical setting. 3. To prospectively compare risk assessment using the ColoPrint profile versus clinical parameters (based on phycisian assessment of risk and ASCO high-risk recommendations: T4, or perforation/obstruction, or G3, and/or inadequate node sampling (< 12 nodes) or poorly differentiated histology). 4. To establish the proportion of low risk and high risk ColoPrint profile in colon cancer patients. 5. To compare the performance of ColoPrint vs the clinical risk assessment in estimating 5-year relapse rate.

Ineligible (n=135) Not analyzable (n=87)

n=236

Variable

N

Age (years)

median

Stage I (n=119) Gender

Pending (n=76)

LN assessed

37 - 91

left

40

17

right

103

44

sigmoid

93

39

M

123

52

F

113

48

median

21

range

Eligible and analyzable Stage II (n=266)

LN >12

Eligible and analyzable Stage III (n=257)

Grade

pT

Localization of 26 study sites

71

range Localization

%

0 - 74

No

26

11

Yes

210

89

I

61

26

II

113

48

III

62

26

3

199

84

4

37

16

166

70

70

30

Physician Risk Assessment Low High

Current status

*DMFS; Disease Metastasis-Free Survival

• 26 centers open for patient recruitment.

Multivariate analysis stage II HR

95% CI

p-value

ColoPrint

3.53

1.33 - 9.36

0.011

ASCO recommendation*

1.9

0.75 - 4.83

0.174

* T4, high grade, perforation and/or less than 12 LN assessed

For more information and a list of all participating study sites, please check:

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00903565

• Over 900 samples submitted worldwide. • Samples from 266 eligible and analyzable stage II patients included.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.