10 minute read
RILAs: One way to keep the ‘risk on’ in retirement
A look at how registered indexlinked annuities are gaining interest as other investments carry higher risks.
By David Blanchett
These are difficult times for investors. So far in 2022, stocks and bonds are down, and inflation is up. While this may scare many investors away from investing in risky assets such as stocks, maintaining an exposure to the stock market can be essential for retirees who need to fund income for 30 years or more.
Registered index-linked annuities are one product that has gained an increasing amount of interest — and assets — among investors. Here is an introduction to RILAs, as well as an exploration of some of the differences in individuals who purchase RILAs both with and without a protected lifetime income benefit, or PLIB. This information is based on actual sales data from Prudential Financial, based on their FlexGuard and FlexGuard Income products.
Although RILAs aren’t technically all that new, as they’ve been available for about a decade, they are relatively new as annuities go. RILAs go by a variety of names such as structured annuities, indexed variable annuities or buffered annuities. Although these sound like very different things, the underlying strategy is generally very similar in that an insurance company uses financial options to gain a unique exposure to some type of market/ investment, typically using a “buffer” or a “floor” approach. Buffers are the most common option, where the first amount of loss is absorbed by the product, based on the buffer level, and the investor would suffer any loss beyond that point.
RILAs can be thought of as a riskier or next-generation version of fixed indexed annuities. With an FIA, the annuitant has virtually no downside risk — apart from the insurer’s default or inability to honor its claims-paying commitments, which applies to pretty much any annuity — and relatively limited upside (called the “cap rate”). However, the upside potential of FIAs has declined significantly in recent years as interest rates have fallen, making FIAs less attractive to investors that want more upside potential.
100
80
Equity Allocation (%)
60
40
20
0
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Age
RILA RILA + Lifetime Income Average Target-Date Fund
Investors show interest in products with protected income
There is relatively little empirical research on individuals who purchase RILAs and how the RILAs are used. I was recently given access to historical sales data for Prudential’s FlexGuard RILA products, both the accumulation-focused version (called FlexGuard), which I simply refer to as a RILA, and one that has a protected lifetime income benefit (called FlexGuard Income), which I refer to as a RILA+PLIB. For this analysis, I focus only on the products sold since June 18, 2021, which is when FlexGuard Income (i.e., the RILA+PLIB) was first available. After applying various filters, the data set consists of over 15,000 policies.
Interestingly, the demographics for those in the RILA and RILA+PLIB contracts are relatively similar across dimensions such as annuitant gender, age, marital status, household income and total wealth.
The most notable difference was in premium size, where the RILA+PLIB annuitants tended be significantly higher (approximately $150,000 versus $100,000). Additionally, the RILA+PLIB was more commonly purchased in qualified accounts (77% versus 64%).
The fact that wealth levels are similar for individuals who purchase RILAs, but the premiums are larger for the RILA+PLIB version, suggests that investors may be more willing to allocate higher portions of savings to products that offer protected lifetime income.
The equity-like risk of RILAs
One thing I was especially interested in exploring in the data set was how the allocation decisions varied across the two products (i.e., those with and without a PLIB).
Estimating the risk of RILAs is tricky, though, given how they are constructed. In order to estimate the equity-like risk, I used a substitution analysis where I ran a simulation to determine the equity risk equivalent of adding that particular RILA strategy to a portfolio considering four different risk metrics (standard deviation, downside risk, value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk) for each strategy. In other words, the risk of adding the respective RILA to the portfolio had the equivalent risk of adding a simple equity allocation, as estimated.
For the analysis, I focused entirely on those annuities that only use the available buffer strategies (i.e., aren’t also invested in other non-RILA options within the same contract). What I found is the equity allocations between the RILA and RILA+PLIB were quite similar, but the RILA+PLIB contracts tend to be allocated slightly more conservative, with allocations that are about 5% lower, on average. Note, this effect persists even if controlled for demographic attributes in an ordinary least squares regression.
What is perhaps more interesting, though, is not how the risk levels differ from each other, but how they differ when compared to other professionally managed portfolios, such as target-date mutual funds. The exhibit on the previous page includes information about the average equity allocation for different age groups for the two different RILA products and the average equity allocation for U.S. target-date mutual funds, based on data obtained from Morningstar Direct.
Investors in the RILA tend to have the most aggressive portfolios, followed by the RILA+PLIB, followed by the target-date fund industry average. The risk differences at older ages are relatively startling. The average equity allocations are relatively similar for the youngest cohort, and relatively aggressive, but increasingly diverge at older ages. For example, at age 80, the average RILA allocation is approximately 70% equities, versus 60% equities for the RILA+PILB, versus 37% for the average target-date fund.
RILAs allow more risk
While the optimal risk level varies based on each client situation, this analysis suggests RILAs may be an attractive way for investors to keep the “risk on” during retirement, to the extent they may not be willing to do in a more traditional portfolio.
Additionally, RILAs (or annuities in general) that offer protected lifetime income may be more attractive to retirees given the larger premium for those that provide the PLIB versus those that don’t, especially considering how similar the other demographic attributes were.
David Blanchett is research fellow, Alliance for Lifetime Income, and managing director and head of retirement research, PGIM DC Solutions. David may be contacted at david.blanchett@innfeedback.com.
Now IncomeShield
Fixed Index Annuity delivers even more income
New product enhancements deliver more opportunities for Income Account Value growth and higher payouts.
Explore all the benefits of IncomeShield by visiting www.american-equity.com/incomeshield-annuity.
American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company® does not offer legal, investment, or tax advice. Each client has specific needs which should be discussed with a qualified legal or tax advisor. Annuity and Riders issued under form series ICC17 BASE-IDX-B, ICC17 BASE-IDX, ICC17 IDX-11-10, ICC17 IDX-10-7, ICC20 E-PTP-C, ICC20 E-PTP-PR, ICC20 E-MPTP-C, ICC16 R-MVA, ICC20 R-EBR, ICC20 R-LIBR-FCP, ICC20 R-LIBR-FSP, ICC20 R-LIBR-W-FCP, ICC20 R-LIBR-W-FSP and state variations thereof. Availability may vary by product and state. Guarantees are based on the financial strength and claims paying ability of American Equity. 6000 Westown Pkwy, West Des Moines, IA 50266 01AD-INN-0822 08.01.22 © 2022 American Equity. All Rights Reserved. August 2022 » InsuranceNewsNet Magazine 31www.american-equity.com ● Call us at 888-221-1234
TM
AMERICAN EQUITY
INVESTMENT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY®
100M Americans saddled with health care debt
More than 100 million Americans, including 41% of adults, carry some form of medical debt, according to a nationwide poll conducted by Kaiser Family Foundation. The poll showed not only do patients have bills they can’t afford, but they are borrowing borrowing money to pay medical bills as well.
In the past five years, more than half of U.S. adults report they’ve gone into debt because of medical or dental bills, the KFF poll found. A quarter of adults with health care debt owe more than $5,000. About 1 in 5 who have any amount of debt said they don’t expect to ever pay it off.
This debt is forcing families to cut back on food and other essentials, KFF said. Millions are going into bankruptcy from medical debt and are in danger of losing their homes.
Debt from health care is nearly twice as common for adults under 30 as for those 65 and older, the KFF poll found. About 1 in 7 people with debt said they’ve been denied access to a hospital, doctor or other provider because of
unpaid bills, according to the poll. Two-thirds of those with debt said they have put off care they or a family member need because of cost.
The top benefits cited by surveyed employees included:
» Salary: 67% » Medical benefits: 32% » Work/life balance: 32% » Flexible work hours: 28% Source: LIMRA
EMPLOYEES SEEKING MORE WORK/LIFE BENEFITS
A recent LIMRA study focusing on employee benefits found an increasingly diverse workforce is seeking more robust work/life benefits in addition to salary.
With workplace benefits critical to employers’ efforts to attract and retain employees in today’s hot job market, the LIMRA Benefits and Employee Attitude Tracker study asked employees about the most important criteria they look for in a potential employer. Almost one-third (32%) said work/life balance was most important, while 28% said flexible work hours topped their wish list.
When employers were asked if they were considering adding benefits in the next two years, 22% said they were very/extremely likely to add non-insurance benefits.
Most enrollees who switched from Medigap to Medicare Advantage plans did so because Medigap was too expensive, according to a recent survey.
Almost nine in 10 enrollees were happy with their Medicare Advantage plan, with 88% indicating satisfaction and 86% willing to recommend it to others, according to an eHealth survey in late May. About 27 mil-
lion Americans are enrolled in Medicare Advantage, or 45% of those eligible for Medicare, according to AHIP, which represents health insurers.
Medicare Advantage enrollees are particularly price-sensitive, with 73% saying they can afford only up to $50 monthly. That led many to switch from Medicare Supplement (Medigap) to Medicare Advantage, with 67% saying they did so because of cost.
8% 7%
24% 61% How satisfied are you with
Medicare Advantage compare to other forms of Medicare coverage you’ve had in the past?
More satisfied
Equally satisfied
Less satisfied
I don’t know
QUOTABLE
If you’re an employer and you’re going to invest in benefits, you must be 100% sure you will get the return you are looking for.
— Tracey Watts, national leader for health care policy with Mercer
2ND YEAR OF COVID-19 HURT HEALTH INSURERS’ EARNINGS
Despite the health insurance industry being on firm financial footing in 2021, the indus-
try’s total underwriting gain of $23.9 billion represented a decline of 65% from the previous year, as a more normal level
of activity impacted insurers. That’s
according to an AM Best report.
Increasing COVID-19-related costs also dampened industry results. The report noted that pandemic-related expenses — including treatment, testing and vaccinations — led to claims costs that significantly exceeded projections across the industry. Because of the mandate for insurers to cover COVID-19 testing, carriers had limited flexibility to direct members to testing locations with lower costs.
Non-COVID-19-related usage, which dropped sharply in 2020 for elective procedures and office visits, also bounced back from the lows of 2020, although it remained below historical levels.
Premium growth continued across the health industry, albeit with a modest decrease in the group segment. However, this was offset by expansion of individual business sold through the Affordable Care Act exchanges, which saw enrollment grow year over year by 2.5 million to 14.5 million.
DID YOU KNOW ?
2/3 of employers surveyed said they plan to enhance their workplace health and benefit offerings in 2023.
