ONE SOLUTION FOR ALL YOUR NEEDS
JUST LIKE YOU, WE WORK WITH ONE PURPOSE IN MIND: TO ALLOW YOUR PATIENTS TO HAVE NEW REASONS TO SMILE EVERY DAY. And with this goal in mind we developed the Alvim implant. A solution which combines simplicity, efficiency and affordability to generate the best results.
Empowering you to deliver an outstanding treatment outcome to improve your patients satisfaction.
This solution has been developed with the end result in mind:
FOR YOU
FOR YOUR PATIENTS
Simplicity
Easy to follow treatment
Efficiency
Shorter procedures and drilling protocol
Less time to teeth
Affordability
Potential to attract more patients
Cost-effective treatments
worflow
Less appointments
One design for all your needs. Alvim’s tapered design and conical body with compactive threads help obtain higher primary stability. Combined with a reduced drilling workflow, Alvim implants are available in 3 different diameters and 5 lengths offering suitable options to cover various situations such as healed areas, fresh socket sites, and different bone densities. This makes Alvim a versatile implant for different surgical techniques such as immediate or conventional load.
High bone maintenance supporting a natural and esthetic emergence profile.(1) • Predictable crestal bone preservation when implants are placed subcrestally.(1-5) • CM Implants subcrestal placement showed less bone loss compared to crestal level placement.(2, 4, 5) • Subcrestal placement decreases the stress in the crestal cortical bone.(6)
Proven Cone Morse enhancing exceptional long-term mechanical stability. • Deep cone Morse connection offering a high long-term resistance.(7) • Conical connection providing better results in terms of abutment stability performance.(7-8-9) • Conical seal designed to prevent bacteria migration into the implant.(10)
One prosthetic connection for more simplicity. • N eodent platform switching concept has proved to preserve the bone level(3-6,11), supporting the peri-implant tissue.(6) • T he unique prosthetic connection allows to manage a unique prosthetic portfolio regardless of the implant diameter. • C M implant line offers a large choice of restorative options (straight, angled, screwretained or cemented) as well as a full range of TiBase abutments.
Internal diameter 2.5 mm
Prosthetic index ensuring exact fit. CM EXACT IS A HEXAGONAL INDEX THAT: • Makes handling easier. • Facilitates precise positioning of components. • Ensures precision against rotation.
Indications TiBase CM exact for single
Mini conical abutment for multi
Attachment equator for edentulous
Cost-effective way to place dental implants. Alvim implant line features a new user-friendly cassette with colored coded workflow and the right number of instruments, allowing surgical flexibility combining all 3 implant diameters and 5 leng ths. As the compactive threads of an Alvim implant are originally indicated to soft bone density areas, the Tap Drill is designed to increase the range of recommendations even more providing one solution for all your needs.
Simple and compact surgical kit
Tap Drill
Shorter drilling sequence
INITIAL
3.5 mm
ALVIM BONE TAP
ALVIM
ALVIM
CM PILOT
2.0
3.5
2.8/3.5
103.170
103.171
103.172
103.216
111.036
–√–
–√–
–√–
–x–
–x–
4.3
REFERENCES AND PUBLICATIONS 1- Martin C, Thomé G, Melo AC, Fontão FN. Peri-implant bone response following immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone and with immediate provisionalization-a case series study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;19(2):157-63. 2. Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr, Muglia VA, Lezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(4):371-8. 3. Castro DS, Araujo MA, Benfatti CA, Araujo Cdos R, Piattelli A, Perrotti V, et al. Comparative histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of marginal bone resorption around external hexagon and Morse cone implants: an experimental study in dogs. Implant Dent. 2014;23(3):270-6. 4. Novaes AB Jr, Barros RR, Muglia VA, Borges GJ. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(1):18-27. 5. Siqueira RAC. Avaliação do índice de sucesso e comportamento dos tecidos periimplantares de implantes cone morse equicrestais ou subcrestais em arcos inferiores. [master’s dissertation on internet]. [Curitiba(Brazil)]: ILAPEO; 2013. [cited 28 out 2015] 126p. Available from: http:// www.ilapeo.com.br/Monografias_e_Dissertacoes/Dissertacoes_ turma2011/Rafael_Amorin_Cavalcanti_de_Siqueira.pdf 6. Sotto-Maior BS, Lima Cde A, Senna PM, Camargos Gde V, Del Bel Cury AA. Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28. 7. Bernardes SR, da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M, Hobkirk J, Ribeiro RF. Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):89-96. 8. Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Assuncao WG. The role of implant/ abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):415-22. 9. dos Anjos CM, Harari ND, Reis RSA, Vidigal Junior GM. Análise in vitro da infiltração bacteriana na interface de pilares protéticos e implantes cone-morse / In vitro analysis of bacterial leakage at the interface between Morse taper implant platform and prosthetic abutments. ImplantNews. 2011 8(2):239-243. 10. Sartoretto SC, Alves AT, Resende RF, Calasans-Maia J, Granjeiro JM, Calasans-Maia MD. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015. MayJun;23(3):279-87. 11. Coppedê AR et al. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):283-6. 12.Rupp F, Scheideler L, Eichler M, Geis-Gerstorfer J.Wetting behavior of dental implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec; 26(6):125666. 13.Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Tannenbaum R,Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Electrical implications of corrosion for osseointegration of titanium implants. J Dent Res. 2011 Dec; 90(12): 1389-97.
instradent.us Phone: 855 412 8883 E-mail: info.us@instradent.com
Exclusively distributed by
© 2016 - JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S.A. All rights reserved. All trademarks mentioned herein, registered or not, are property of JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S.A. Reproduction without prior permission is forbidden.