4.6 Ethical Considerations

from Kuunika Evaluation - Kuunika and Covid-19 Digital Surge: Malawi's Pandemic Monitoring and Response

by Mott MacDonald International Development

Annex 2: Topic Guide & Informed Consent Statement for Key Informant Interviews

4.6 Ethical Considerations

The study was undertaken following an approved protocol from the National Health Sciences Research Committee. Authorities in all study targeted areas and institutions were informed of the evaluation in advance. The consent statement explained the background and purpose of the study and how findings would be used. All key informants were: a) assured of confidentiality and anonymity unless formally agreed otherwise; b) informed they were under no obligation to answer any question that made them feel uncomfortable; and c) informed they were free to terminate the interview at any time.

4.6 Ethical Considerations

Next Article

Annex 2: Topic Guide & Informed Consent Statement for Key Informant Interviews

4.6 Ethical Considerations

More articles from this publication:

Annex 2: Topic Guide & Informed Consent Statement for Key Informant Interviews

Figure 23: Evaluation team's reconstruction of the Kuunika causal pathways

7.0 REFERENCES

6.1 Lessons and Recommendations

Figure 21: Global Digital Health Index

5.3.3. Discussion on Kuunika’s role

5.5.2 Factors that May Affect Sustainability

Table 5: Use of OHSP versus Paper/ WhatsApp

Table 6: Summary of Issues for not using OHSP

This article is from:

Kuunika Evaluation - Kuunika and Covid-19 Digital Surge: Malawi's Pandemic Monitoring and Response