Ipek Kuzu Porfolio_2018 by ipek Kuzu

ipek kuzu PORTFOLIO_2018 Architectural & Design Works

makeArch

ipek kuzu e-mail :kuzuipek@gmail.com MArch Graduate Architectural Design The Bartlett School of Architecture_UCL BArch Faculty of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University

Professional Works

06-59

Selection 2013-2018 Purbachal_2018(present) Studio E Architects

24-31

06-23

Harefiled Young Peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Centre_2016 Studio E Architects

Lea Bridge_2015

32-39

Studio E Architects

40-45

Park Orman_2013 arkiZon Mimarlik

Compact Campus_2013

46-53

arkiZon Mimarlik

54-57

Renders / Visualisations 2016/2017 Studio E Architects

MArch-Research

58-69

The Bartlett School of Architecture

Interstitial Iterations___2014

58-69

Research Project

Diploma

70-85

Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Antalya Train Station___2012

70-77

Diploma Project

78-85

Time Consideration Centre___2010 3rd year Project

86-91

Competitions/Urban

Calgary Collaborative Space Network__2015 86-91 An Ideas Competition for Collaborative Teams to Re-envision Calgaryâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Remnant Public Spaces

The proposal is for a new school on a 25,575m² site in the new planned township of Purbachal in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The whole area (6,150 acres / 2489 Ha ) is a greenfield site and all the infrastructure is in the process of being built. Briefing documents suggested schedule of accommodation for a building of approximately 33,000m² gross internal floor area (25,425m² Net internal). The School is to accommodate up to 5760 pupils ranging in age from 2 to 18 and 500 staff members (Preprimary, Primary , Middle and Upper Schools ) The area plan designates a fixed area for the Primary and Secondary School and a shared outdoor pitch, sized to accommodate a U16 football pitch. The Architectural Strategy aims to minimise congestion by clear and direct connectivity between facilities, both internally and externally. Central location of facilities shared between the secondary and primary schools:Providing well distributed and easily accessible large, sheltered recreational spaces, zoned to respect the pre-primary, primary, middle and upper school users. 6

PURBACHAL SCHOOL Studio E Architects A new school project in the new planned township of Purbachal in Dhaka, Bangladesh.(2017-present) (work in progress) Design Team Architectural Design:Studio E Architects MEP Design :Max Fordam and Local Dhaka based MEP Consultant,EMCS Structral Design:Local Dhaka based ; SB Consultant 7

Architectural Strategy

Creating a clear and user friendly organisational strategy that clusters facilities around agreed groupings:

Pre-Primary Years

1. Primary School

2. High School

Pre-Primary Years

3.Sport Cluster

4.Social Cluster

Minimising congestion by clear and direct connectivity between facilities, both internally and externally. This is a key issue given the overall size of school.Central location of facilities shared between the secondary and primary schools:Providing well distributed and easily accessible large, sheltered recreational spaces, zoned to respect the pre-primary, primary, middle and upper school users.Clear arrival/departure strategy that takes into account clientsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; preferred procedures and recognises the different population groupings.

NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWIN STUDIO E ARC

THE CONTRAC NOT SCALE FR DRAWING ALL TO BE TAKEN DIMENSION S

WHERE ANY D ARE FOUND B DIMENSIONS BE BROUGHT ATTENTION O ARCHITECTS RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCR BETWEEN RE ASSEMBLY DR DETAIL DRAW LATTER TAKE

Key

Typical Classroom Section

NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGH STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMIT

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXI BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAW INGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Key

Primary Section

30.06 St 2017

STAG

STUDIO E A

90A Tooley Stree London SE1 2TH

DPS STS PURBAC DESCRIPTION

3D Section DESCRIPTION

1324-SEA-2SHEET NUMBER

NTS@A1 SCALE

04/08/2017 18:26:57

19.06 Stage 3 Draf 2017

High School Section

STAGE 3 DR

STUDIO E ARCHITECT 90A Tooley Street, London SE1 2TH

NOTE 1. THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED. 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS. 3. WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION. 4.

NG 2

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Key

Roof 2

DGCG2

Section ST04 B

21400

1324-SEA-00-B1-DR-A-100-DRAFT Det. 2

ROOF 3 20400 Roof 19900

Level 4 16300

Level 3 12700

level primary pool 10140 Level 2 9100

Level 1 5500

Level +1.5 1500 Level 0 + 0.75 750 Level 0 0

Basement @100

STAGE 4 DRAFT

-2500 Basement 2

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

-3500

90A Tooley Street, London SE1 2TH

DPS STS SCHOOL PURBACHAL, DHAKA STS GROUP PROJECT

Section 5 @ 50 DRAWING

1324-SEA-03-ZZ-DR-A-200-00

Section 5 Copy 1

DRAWING REFERENCE

1 : 50

NOTE

1324

1. THIS DRAWING IS COPYR STUDIO E ARCHITECTS L

DWG. NO.

16/08/17 1 : 50 DATE

SCALE

2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIO BS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS. REVISION CHECKED

3. WHERE ANY DISCREPAN ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUS BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

18/01/2018 19:17:56

Section 4 @50 - Dependent 1 1324-SEA-00-01-DR-A-602-00 Det. -1

WHERE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN REFERENCE O ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFEREN

Key

Section ST02

1324-SEA-00-B1-DR-A-100-DRAFT Det. ST02

CC CB

Section ST03

CD CF

CM CL

CP CQ

1324-SEA-00-B1-DR-A-100-DRAFT Det. ST03 A

Roof 2 21400 ROOF 3 20400 Roof 19900

Level 4 16300

Level 3 12700

Level 2 9100

Level 1 5500

Level +1.5 1500 Level 0 + 0.75 750 Level 0 0

Basement @100 -2500 Basement 2 -3500

STAGE 4 DRAFT

STUDIO E ARCHI LTD 90A Tooley Street, London SE1 2TH

DPS STS SCHOOL PURBACHAL, DHAK STS GROUP PROJECT

section senior po DRAWING

section senior pool

1324-SEA-01-01-DR

1 : 50

DRAWING REFERENCE

1324 DWG. NO.

18/01/2018 19:17:45

01/16/18 1 : 50 DATE

SCALE

REVISIO

The proposed site is located east of Harefield Village,Ash Grove Road.It is an vacant backland site, predominantly grass within a post-war housing development of two storey semi-detached houses. The proposed new building will provide holiday and after school sessional activities for young people aged 8-19yrs. The building is located in the narrower eastern corner of the site. This is to keep the existing public space as open as possible and give the main entrance some visibility from Ash Grove,The open pedestrian route will continue through the site, offset around the new building. For the Young Peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Centre a face brick is proposed as the predominant faĂ§ade material. The proposed brick is sympathetic with those used in the area but is not identical to any one of them. A buff multi-coloured stock brick is proposed. Doors and windows will be aluminium framed.The proposed roof is metal which is more suited to the long spans and lower pitched roofs than are the tiles on the neighbouring properties.

HAREFIELD YOUNG PEOPLEâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S CENTRE Studio E Architects Holiday and after school sessional activities for young people aged 8-19yrs,(2015-2016) Design Team Architectural Design:Studio E Architects Landscape Design:Gillespies Structural and M&E Design (Project Consultancy) : Pick Everard STUDIO E ARCHITECTS

NOTE

2035 1 (05)102

SS02

3495.0

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

(05)101

4907.5 D24

(06)101

(05)104

4399.5

CW07b

8827.5 P01

4 2

2 (05)102

(05)103

4412.5

Key

3037.5

3487.5

SS01

5522.5 SS03

SS01

A B

460.0

MJ P01 CW03 EQ

P02

CW01

D01

C 3825.0

4285.0

P02

P01

P02 R01 Lobby

P02

R02 Admin

14.1 m²

(05)103

(05)104

P07

28.8 m² 260

P07

2363

MJ 260

D11

D04

P10 P03

D02

P02

D03

CW-02

P03 Store

P07X

1.2 m²

R08 Dance Studio

R05 Dis.WC

35.3 m²

P11

4.0 m²

R03 Sports Hall

RWP

139.2 m²

P05 D05

P06

D06

P03-T1 (06)100

(05)100

10.7 m²

300 D09

Store

D18

R11 Acoustic Enclosure

P07X

P04

D25

P07X

11.6 m²

6670.0

4235.0

R06 Male WC

P03-T1

P09

D10

3.3 m²

D17

Store

D19

P11

P02

P05 D07

1.8 m²

1 P03

P06

P01

D08

(06)100

1537

P07

P03-T1

P02

G R04 Activities Hall

Store

D20

95.1 m²

R07 Female WC

1.8 m²

R09 Plant Room

11.6 m²

P04 P06

D13

5.5 m²

P06

3500.0

4235.0

P03-T1

P09

Store

D21

P03-T3

1.3 m²

OVEN

REF.

OVEN

P03-T2

OVEN

D22

2 (05)100

P02

R10 Kitchen

2.2 m²

2585.0

4285.0

SS08

Store 170

P03-T4

P06

34.0 m²

D23

D14

P09

D15

P01

890.0

J 890.0

J P02

K D16 SS07

CW05

W03

W02

SS06

SS05

W01

SS04

TENDER

1238

8827.5

880.0

7522.5

4412.5

3487.5

3037.5

3385

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS

310 The Print Rooms, 164/180 Union St London SE1 0LH

HAREFIELD YOUNG PEOPLE'S CENTRE PROJECT

Ground Floor Proposed Plan

1 : 50

Ground Proposed DRAWING

(06)101

1/50

20/07/16

SCALE

DATE

1315 (04)100

10 m @1:50

DWG. NO.

REVISION

20/07/2016 22:29:15

NOTE

3487.5

FFL 8.961

3037.5

4412.5

7522.5

(05)102

8721

880.0

Ridge

8827.5

FFL 8.961

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Ridge

8.750 Window head 15.00 1:3.73°

(05)103

(05)101

Key

(05)101

(05)104

6355

6.317

6.304

Eaves 1

Window Head 3

5600

D F H

10.00° 1:5.67

15.00 1:3.73°

4.595 Window Sill 3 1200

1200

3.785 S

3.525 Parapet 1200

Top of Steel

90200

1200

P02

1695

LEVEL 0 GF

(21)100

87200

LEVEL 0 GF 450 150

-0.150

Top of Steel

2961.8

90200

SSL

87200

-0.600 Foundation

-600

Section 1 1 : 50

(05)102

3487.5

3037.5

4412.5

7522.5

2 880.0

FFL 8.961

1 8827.5 FFL 8.961

Ridge

8.750 Window head

2 (05)101

(05)103

(05)101

(05)104

6.317

6.304

Eaves 1

Window Head 3

4.595 Window Sill 3

5 Parapet 1 Eaves

1 (05)101

(05)103

3.525 FFL 3.5003.500

FFL 3.500

Top of Steel

90200

600

900

1207

900

600

610

600

610

1200

610

600

220

908

P03-T4

LEVEL 0 GF

510

LEVEL 0 GF

87200 -0.150

87200

SSL

-0.600 Foundation

(05)101

WALL UNIT

600

WALL UNIT OVEN

REF.

OVEN

OVEN 600

600

DRAWERS

BASE UNIT

DRAWERS

WALL UNIT

1200

BASE UNIT

(05)103

600

610

600

610

1200

610

600

220

2670

SURVERY COUNTER TOP

BASE UNIT

D Elevation

(05)100

DRAWERS 1 B Elevation

BASE UNIT

400

BASE UNIT

2 A Elevation

600

C Elevation

34.0 mÂ²

BASE UNIT

640

R10 Kitchen

OVEN

1400

BASE UNIT

1200

800

600

1200

LARDER UNIT TO BE USED AS A CLEANER'S CUPBOARD TO BE LOCKABLE 1200

600

1400

7401

615

1200

603

600

J BASE UNIT

HANDWASH 600

LARDER UNIT

BASE UNIT

SINK UNIT

SINK UNIT DW

BASE UNIT

LARDER UNIT

260 NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

H72/370 Falzinc Verge Pressing H72/110 Falzinc Roofing on composite panel

H43/120 Metal Composite Panel Roof H43/ 120 Compriband Weatherseal F30/212 Wall Ties to Steel Columns

Key

P02C 1

F10/110 Face brick F30/157 Partial Fill Rigid Insulation

A D F

401

P10/320 Breather Membrane

H72/400 Flazinc Coping

J41/110 Bitumen Membrane on Plywood

Stud Wall (Plywood) F30/331 DPC F30/133 Weepholes

P10/3

Timber Firrings to Engineers

H72/40

3.525

P02

Parapet

P02B Steel posts supporting timber kerb F10/110 Face brick

F10/1 F30/1 Insula

J41/110 Bitumen Membrane on Plywood

F30/157 Partial Fill Rigid Insulation Stud Wall (Plywood)

3000

90200

90200 2720

730

2730

F30/236A Fixing Ties to timber frames 2325

C04

2697

F30/2 to tim

2500

F30/2 Steel

C04

F30/236A Fixing Ties to timber frames F30/265A MDC Support Bracet

F30/212 Wall Ties to Steel Columns

Stud

Top of Steel

N10/240 Blind

F30/3

P10/310 VCL Monarflex F30/331 DPC

F30/

P10/.... VCL

F30/133 Weepholes

H11/110 Curtain Walling SS03

9mm Ceramic Tile M40/110 16mm Render M20/135

140mm blockwork F10/255

50 x 18 architrave L20/412A

P03-T1 Frame

9mm Ceramic Tile M40/110

L20/412A 44mm thick door M40/110 Ceramic Tiles L20/412A

Render M50/131 Carpet Tiling 16mm M20/135

M20/135 Render M50/152 Non Slip Vinyl

M10/130 Levelling Screed Concrete Lintel

13mm Plaster M20/210

F10/335 Concrete Blockwork 32 x 19mm stop

50 x 18 architrave L20/412A

L20/412A

M10/130 Levelling Screed

M20/210 Plaster

L20/412A E60/110 Precast beam and block floor 32 x 19mm stop L20/412A

Mineral wool filler L20/412A

Dado Trunking

140mm blockwork F10/255 13mm Plaster M20/210 M50/131 Carpet Tiling

LEVEL 0 GF

44mm thick door L20/412A

L20/412A

F30

Insu 9.JAMB D Wood F30 Do

2.HEAD DETAIL P20/200 Skirting Wood Doorset Internal Non Fire Rated

LEVEL 0 GF

E60/110 Precast beam and block floor

F30

87200

Frame L20/412B

-0.150

F30

Dado Trunking

50 x 18 architrave L20/412B

-0.150

Intumescent fire and smoke seal L20/410B 44mm thick door L20/412B

SSL

F30

L20/412A

M10/130 Levelling Screed 1.JAMB DETAIL Wood Doorset Internal Non Insulation Fire Rated P20/200 Skirting

87200

Frame

Insulation E60/110 Precast beam and block floor

LEVEL 0 GF

P20/2

Mineral woll filler

InsulationL20/412A

100mm blockwork F10/255

SSL 13mm plaster M20/210 9mm Ceramic Tile M40/110

-0.600

13mm -0.600 Plaster M20/210 Foundation

32 x 19mm stop L20/412B

Foundation

50 x 18 architrave L20/412B

Frame L20/412B

Mineral wool filler L20/412B 100mm blockwork F10/255 13mm Plaster M20/210

TENDER

HAREFIELD YOUNG PEOPLE'S CENTRE

L20/412B 3.JAMB DETAIL Wood Doorset Internal 30 min Fire Rated 50 x 18 architrave L20/412A

Kitchen 1/2

Frame L20/410A

DATE

44mm thick door L20/412B

DWG. NO.

1 : 20

REVISION

11.JAMB External S

L20/412A

32 x 19mm stop L20/410A

1 : 20

Frame L20/410A

32 x 19mm stop L20/410A

Mineral wool filler L20/410A

44mm thick door L20/410A

140mm blockwork F10/255

50 x 18 architrave Mineral wool filler L20/412B L20/410A Frame L20/412B Intumescent fire and smoke seal IntumescentL20/410A fire and smoke seal L20/410B 44mm thick door L20/412B Vision Panel Frame

Detail Section 8 50 x 18 architrave L20/410A

CHECKED

2.HE Woo

Concrete Lintel

13mm Plaster M20/210

Vision Panel Frame

Detail Section 7 1315 (70)001

L20/412B

13mm plaster 1.JAMB DETAIL M20/210 Wood Doorset Internal Non Fire Rated Glass

32 x 19mm stop L20/412A

140mm blockwork F10/255 13mm Plaster M20/210

44mm thick door L20/410A

20/07/16

44mm thick doorfire and smoke seal Intumescent L20/412A L20/412B

4.HEAD DETAIL Wood Doorset Internal 30 min Fire Rated

DRAWING

1/20

L20/412A

Mineral wool filler L20/412A

PROJECT

SCALE

50 x 18 architrave L20/412A Mineral wool filler Frame L20/412B

32 x 19mm stop L20/412B

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD 310 The Print Rooms, 164/180 Union Street London SE1 0LH

16mm Render Concrete Lintel M20/135

Glass

13mm Plaster M20/210

L20/410A 5.JAMB DETAIL Wood Doorset Internal Non Fire Rated,Vision Panel 50 x 18 architrave L20/410B Frame L20/410B Intumescent fire and smoke seal L20/410B 44mm thick door L20/410B

32 x 19mm stop L20/412B

L20/410A

6.HEAD DETAIL Mineral wool filler Wood Doorset Internal Non Fire Rated,Vision Panel L20/412B 100mm blockwork F10/255 13mm Plaster M20/210

13mm plaster M20/210

3.JAMB DETAIL Wood Doorset Internal 30 min Fire Rated Concrete Lintel 13mm Plaster

L20/412B

4.HE Woo

Refurbishment of an existing 10 storey tower and addition of 4 storey extensions to provide 106 additional bedrooms. The total hostel provision, on completion, will accommodate 229 homeless people. The refurbishments are a major building fabric upgrade and the extensions/re-organisation provide much improved communal, staff and entrance/reception facilities. This is a massive boost for a highly needed facility.

LEA BRIDGE HOUSE Studio E Architects Hostel for homeless people (2015) Client:Rydon/Paradigm Housing Value: Â£ 5.5 Milion Completion Date: Final Phase 3Q 2017

4460*

3 10

NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Key

Proposed Wes Wing Extensio

3 10

Lea Bridge Road

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

Demoition + Previous 90A Tooley Street, London SE1 2TH

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10 PROJECT

Demolition + Perivious DRAWING

05/10/17 SCALE

DATE

NOTE

Checker

1314 (06)166

10/05/2017 17:24:41

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT DWG. NO. STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.REVISION

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

CHECKED

Key

14.361

Main Entrance

14.450

14.600

3 4

Courtyard 10

14.600

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD 90A Tooley Street, London SE1 2TH

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10 PROJECT

New DRAWING

05/10/17 SCALE

DATE

Checker

1314 (06)168 DWG. NO.

REVISION

CHECKED

10/05/2017 17:25:47

Refurbisment + New

Proposed Wing Exte

25 3

25 3 23

19/09/2016 15:13:42

14.350

23 14.425

30 23

14.310

No rt

6811*

Hard Landscape

40 23

14.250

Courtyard

14.300

1 Vehicle Macadam Vehicle Macadam to b good following drainag services work, and to details and specificatio

14.338

2 Pedestrian Macada Pedestrian Macadam engineer's details and specifications

14.270

st on

EXTERNAL EXIT STAIR

14.307

Waste Existing Store

14.300

TELECOMS ENCLOSURE

14.450

3 Paving to Pedestria Charcon British Std. F Size:400x400x60mm Colour:Grey Bond:Stack

14.302

4 PPC Hazard Warnin Size :400x400x50mm Colour:Natural Bond:Stack

14.360

5 PPC Blister Paving Size:400x400x50 Colour:Natural Bond:Stack

2 14.300

23 10

14.450

14.600

1100L Eurobins

Courtyard

BINS

10 PPC Pin Kerb Pre cast concrete flat Size:50x150x915 Colour:Natural

11 Kerbs to Pedestria Charcon British Std. K Size:Based on traditio dimensions 145 x 255mm

14.325

20 Trellis on top of br New 0.2m high trails o 1.6m high brick wall

21 Existing railing to 1.6m high railing to be and made good.

Existing Car Park 14.260

Existing Ten Storey Tower Block

23 Railing incorporat lockable gate New 1.8m high Vertica railing incorporating a gate.

1100L Eurobins

22 Railing on top of b New 1.5m Vertical Ba fixed to top of 0.3m br wall.Galvanised.

14.351

BINS

24 Railing on top of New 0.5m railing on to existing 1.6m high bric

25 Railing New 1.5m high Vertica railing. Galvanised.

800.00800.00

26 Railing on top of 0.3m railing on the top existing 1.5m high bric

14.600

14.304

14.290

27 New boundary wal on top Existing one storey bu be demolished. New 1 boundary wall to matc with new railing on top

14.327 EXTERNAL EXIT STAIR WITH ENCLOSURE

East ension

14.319

Cycle Store for 12 Bikes

30 Cycle hoops 7no Stands = 14 bikes

31 Secure Cycle Cage Falcolok 300 Galvanised 3.1 x 4.0m Mesh (10 bikes) Cycle Cage - bike rac Falco Vert-Plus 12 no.

31 14.333

19028*

2775*

12389*

32 Tenant cycle shelt 7 stands 14 bikes Cycle Stands Total 40 bikes

14.364

Vehicular Access

Existing Gate to Remain

14.361

Existing Gas Meter

24 9893*

2237*

40 Permeable Resin Bon with perimeter concret kerbs

41 Benches Furnitubes Ribbon Se 1200 long or 3no. 180

Lea Bridge Road

Site Plan/External works

1 (05)153 W007a ? Bathroom ? WG.07

1.3?m²

DW001 FD30S

ED007

WT009

1500.00

1360.00

CJ DE030 FD30S

DW013 FD30S

212.27

(05)154

9.6 m²

? W008a ? WG.08 Bathroom

DW014 FD60S

1.3?m²

W007 Room WG.07

1568.00

796.00

3807.31

DT035

6000 (dim tbc on site)

P09

1510.00

616.00

DT024 FD30S WT012

Dry Riser Relocated

850.00141.00

P03

ST002

ED002

T015 Stair / Lift Lobby

22.9 m²

(06)111

P03

510.00*

DT001 FD30S

T002 Office Entrance 6.1 m² DT002 FD60S

WT011

ED001

1010.00 75.01 DT030 FD30S

P03

EXTENT OF PARTITION WALLS TO BE AGREED FOLLOWING SITE INVESTIGATIONS

3550 S/0

(06)111

522.00

DT023 FD30S

P03

1220

1510.00

1111.25 75.00 1086.00

1978*

23.2 m²

WW015 ED003

(06)112

DT027 FD60S

T016 Corridor

P03

P04

554.00*

710.00 460.00

T018 WC

122.00

MJ (high level)

DT025 FD30S

1471.00

1.8 m²

28.8 m²

1745

11.7 m²

1049.00

T024 Meeting Room

3203*

T017 Reading Room

P10

P09

1023

219

DE009 FD30S

DE010 FD30S

P25

440

552

1013

1023

440

P26

DE011B FD60S

0.9 m²

DE012 FD30S

DE013 FD30S

CJ ? E006a ? EG.06 Bathroom

1.7?m²

10 848

164

853

9.4 m²

1023

4195

3755

9.4 m²

865

566

556

1023

P25

DE014 FD60S

355

10 742 110

710 810

P20

390 552

DE025 FD60S 552

1079

140

P20

1539 1023

E020 SR

0.9 m²

DE015 FD30S

CJ ? E007a ? EG.07 Bathroom

? E008a ? EG.08 Batroom

1.7?m²

9.4 m²

1023

140

E008 Room EG.08 9.1 m²

674

863

1165

175

265 10 890

140

1023 215 10 743

CJ CJ

440 P26

DE014B FD60S

E007 Room EG.07

770

P16

10 1079

140

E006 Room EG.06

1549

967

1023

140

P20

9.1 m²

E005 Room EG.05

P20

4195

140

DE024 FD30S

P16

23.5 m²

1.7?m²

E004 Room EG.04

770 P17

E027 Corridor

441

P26

E019 SR

777 1023

7.3 m²

P19

1079

DE003 FD30S

E026 Kitchen East 2

140

4195

552

P25 DE011

? E004a ? EG.04 Bathroom

968

DE004B FD60S

1079

1010

SVP

P20

777 441

P19

1010 1023

131

3755

E018 SR

0.4 m²

1023

440

P26

440

1.7?m²

0.9 m²

0.5 m² FD60S

DE002 FD30S

FD60S

WE003

1023 1023

P26

DE008 FD60S

1765

439

DE004 FD60S

MJ (high level)

140 290 10

351

P25

778 UHF manifold

E014 ER DE027

2.6 m²

? E001a ? EG.01 Bathroom

E016 SR

DE005 FD30S

P19

798 798

DE006 FD30S

P19

552 553

1.7?m²

P20

1023

WE002

9.2 m²

E015 Store

190

P23 215 10 83 1178

0.4 m² DE007 FD60S

? E002a ? EG.02 Bathroom

MJ (high level)

E017 SR

E002 Room EG.02

9.2 m²

100

3300

P23

3740

9.0 m²

P20

1.7?m²

140

P19

E003 Room EG.03

300 140

? E003a ? EG.03 Bathroom

E001 Room EG.01

DE027B FD60S

P16

UHF manifold

190

WE001

P25

DE001 FD60S

1364

P20

1023

231

821

P20

10 154

MJ (high level)

693

2992

470

685 WE014

P23

1023

1459

WE015

P19

3966

P19

24374 10 22

WE004

1023

WE005

1013

1003

1023

WE006

2128

1023

1790

WE007

10 328

1023

WE008

1678

1023

1085

WT008

(05)100

(02)030

NOTE

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

30.00 695.00

1510.00

75.00

3101.28

P04

P09

DT004 FD60S

P03

DT005 FD60S

97.00

P04

914.00

P07 EXISTING FIRE ENCASEMENT TO COLUMNS TO BE CONFIRMED ON SIDE.

P01

910.00

T014 Claner Cupboard 1.4 m² WT010

T020 Stairs

P01

14.5 m² DT009 FD30S

1325.00

P02

DT006 FD60S

P01

T005 Staff WC

ED006

P02

1.7 m²

97.00

914* P02

P01

1370.00 DT003 FD30S

3065.23

2000.00

P06 POSSIBLE NEW LINING TO INTERNAL WALL

1.5 m²

1.4 m²

DT010 FD30S

12.7 m²

Shower

DT019 FD30S

P09

4485.12

Drying Seat

Existing Riser

665.00 710.00 810.00 810.00 810.00 200.00 197.00 151.00

DT020 FD30S

P03

T012 SR

P05 30 MIN. INFILL PANEL TO EXIT WINDOW OPENING WITH 45dB SEPARATION

T007 Store

T006 Store

DT026 FD30S

T008 Corridor

P03

6.2 m²

0.8 m²

1120.00

75.00 1086.00

1925*

T009 Dis.WC

1.2 m²

DT017 FD30S

P04 DnT (Tmf.MAX).w 50dB

P01

DT011 FD30S

1086.00 210.92

594.00

DT021 FD30S

DT015 FD30S

T010 store

DT020

122.00

P09

11.6 m²

3.9 m²

1328.03

LIFT TO BE SURVEYED ON SITE

T013 Interview Room 2B

122.00

2824.71

ST003

3.8 m²

T011 Interview Room 1

1060.00 61.29

T013 Interview Room 2A

2280*

1400.00

122.00

709.87

100.00

P04

1400.00

DT014 FD30S

2235.00

DT033 FD60S

DT008 FD30S

DT007 FD30S

152.03

1510.00

P04

2834* WT001

CJ PLASTERBOARD INFILL PANEL

1 (05)151

ED004

P23

WE016

E025 Kitchen East 1

90 MINUTE RATE CONSTRUCTION LI

WT002

TEMPORARY WEATHER PROOF INFILL TO NEW OPENING UNTIL LATER PHASE EAST WING WORKS.

copier

190 P23

ALL PARTITIONS TO MEET ACOUSTIC AND FIRE REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON THE PROPOSED FIRE PLANS,ACOUSTIC AND FIRE CONSULTANT REPORTS. 30 MINUTE RATE CONSTRUCTION LI

17.6 m²

60 MINUTE RATE CONSTRUCTION LI

11.9 m²

WT003

T004 Meeting Room

2220.00

P05

(06)114

(06)115

4877

10 215

505

845

WE009

1 1023

907

1461

1679

1461

168 20 275

DE020 FD60S

E022 SR

965 10

WE010

1023

E011 Room EG.11

496

1.5?m²

9.6 m²

1988

1023

405

1155

140

1.5?m²

652 10 665

365 10 930 1023

WE013

1678

WE011

1023

405

2622

22.04 2016

140 Blockwork between rooms

Bearing Wall to SR E0

12 11.02 2016

UFH Manifolds adde

11 08.02 2016

Riser E014 Splitted

10 08.01 2016 09 15.12 2015

General Revision

Updated to stur. engr. comments. Dims indica

08 16.10 2015

Blockwork updated wall tags indicated

07 11.09 2015

Update to Service Information

(05)152

P23

(06)114

FOR CONSTRUCTION E012 Room EG.12 10.4 m²

1023

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

310 The Print Rooms, 164/180 Union Street London SE1 0LH

1305

WE012

1023

1227 10

(06)113

957

? ? E011a E012a ? EG.11 Bathroom ? EG.12 Bathroom

DE021 FD30S

0.6 m²

P20

P19

1023

140

190

2787

910

1360

126

300P19

215

190

810

18 545

190

DE019 FD30S

485

P22

910

1170

DE022 FD30S

1023 1010

140

208 10 1212

DE023 FD60S

8.8 m²

140 P19290 266 P23

2301

1105

1125

0.3 m²

300

9.2 m²

1.5?m²

1150

2661

1981

140

190

P203962

3962

1023

10 209

P23

DE018 FD30S

E010 Room EG.10

? E010a ? EG.10 Bathroom

145 10 478

1010

190

140

10.5 m²

845

1168 10102 P16

P22

E021 SR

E009 Room EG.09

MJ ED005

2892 197

MJ (high level)

1.7 m²

P19

P22

DE017 FD60S

E013 Room EG.13 P23

E023 SR

2221

? ? CJ ? E009a Bathroom EG.09

0.5 m²

738

P20

P26

425

MJ (high level)

DE016 FD30S

2387

1.3?m²

328 140

496 215

19.8 m²

? E013a ? EG.13 Bathroom

1141

2355

1165

1010

E028

Corridor 2115

P20

1396 1023

14.6 m²

P20

DE026 FD30S

1278

760

P20

256

E024 Enterance

140 120

3437

15 01.07 Corridor walls setting up 2016 updated

19.04 13 2016

260

585 190

P09 EXISTING RISER INTERNAL WALL UPGRADED FOLLOWING DEMOLITION WORKS TO ACHIEVE 90 MIN FIRE RATING REFER TO DRAWING 1314-(04)102 FOR CONTINUATION OF PARTITION KEY * ASTERIX DENOTES DIMENSIO TO BE CHECKED ON SITE PRIO TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWINGS. 1314-(22) 300 SERIES 1314-(32) 300 SERIES AND NBS SPECIFICATIONS. REFER ALSO TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND M&E ENGINEER DOCUMENTATION.

243.00 P04

T003 Office 46.6 m²

P03 RW5 dB + 30 MIN. FR. MR ON ROOM SIDE.

WT004

1682.28

DT012 FD60S

1060.00 300.00

P04

1100.00 394.00

DT022 FD60S

DT032 FD30S

1810.00

P09

3382.17

P02 RW45 Db + MR ROOM SIDE TO WCS' ON CIRCULATION

3042.28 1060.00 300.00

P04

258.00 1120.00 76.00

1454.00

1200.08 259.75 1060.00 244.92

838.14 838.14

P03

DT031 FD60S

P02

50.00

DT028 FD30S

11.9 m²

97.00

921.00

P01

2917.41 4626.51

122.00

3160.32

T023 Staff Kitchen

13.4 m²

15.6 m²

680.00

P03

P01 30 MINUTES(NO dB)

T022 Staff Room

T021 Laundry

3055.06

P03

DT029 FD30S

PHASE 1 BOUNDARY PHASE 3 BOUNDARY

5092.33

300.00 1060.00 50.00

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

Key

4.5 m²

97.00

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

T019 Dis WC.

P02

2978.00

WT005

WT006

WT007

440

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10 PROJECT

Ground Proposed 1/2 DRAWING

Ground Floor Plan 1:50 SCALE

3701/07/16

1314 (04)101 DWG. NO.

DATE

REVISION

CHEC

Roof Plant details to be confirmed by T4/MG Partnership

4478

1350

1125

Mansard angle at 86° degrees

2558

Vertical Mansards 02 (05)203

PARAPET +12.970 Datum= + 27.570

Canopy to fire escape route beyond 01

Balustrade to fire escape route beyond

(06)113

PARAPET +10.040 Datum= + 24.650

WE309 ED301

RWP

PARAPET +1

FFL 3 +9.550 Datum= + 24.160 FFL 3

FFL 3 +9.550 EQ

Mansard angle at 86° degrees

500

WE212

WE215

RWP

TOP OF BLOC

TOP OF BLOCK +7.350 Datum= + 21.960

540.00 725.00

DPC FFL 2 +6.625 Datum= + 21.235 FFL 2

DPC CB

FFL 2 +6.625 02

RWP

(06)114

U/S OF S/O +

WE113

R1 TOP OF S/O +4.500 Datum= + 19.110

1585.00

U/S OF S/O +6.085 Datum= + 20.695 WE116

U/S OF S/O

TOP OF S/O

3703

DPC

BRICK TYPE A

375 375 450 375 375

U/S OS S/O +2.860 Datum= + 17.470

TOP OF S/O +0.825 Datum= + 15.435

FFL G +0.00 Datum= + 14.610 FFL G DPC

PUFV

2495.03

TOF -1.050 Datum= + 13.560 TOF

1 38

Elevation06 1 : 50

900

TOP OF BRICK +3.450 Datum= + 18.060

600

2925.00

WE013

800.00

FFL 1 +3.700

TOP OF BRIC

WE016

U/S OS S/O +

PUFV

825.00

3590

2035.00

FFL 1 +3.700 Datum= + 18.310 FFL 1

840.00

FFL G +0.00

2107.47

TOF -1.050

Elevation for Construction

Ele 1:

North East Elevation

South East Elevation

North West Elevation

South West Elevation

NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

NOTE 1.

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Key

NOTE

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWING ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE TAKEN FROM DIMENSION STRINGS.

WHERE ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THESE MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECTS FOR RESOLUTION.

WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN REFERENCE OR ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS & DETAIL DRAWINGS, THE LATTER TAKE PREFERENCE.

Key

Roof Top

Metal cladding PPC aluminium Darker blue: RAL5007 Lighter blue: RAL5024 Grey infil panels RAL7004

Pale grey brick_type A Florian Eris

47200.00

Brise Soleil. Aluminium PPC RAL7004

Rheinzink Blue Grey zinc standing seam cladding including parapet and cill pressings

Roof Top

Key

Roof Top

47200.00

THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LIMITED.

Key

Roof Top

47200.00

SE SW

Roof Floor 43680.00

Ninth Floor 40890.00

Eigth Floor

Pale grey brick_type B Florian Meteor

Brick banding - Ibstock Atlas Smooth Blue

Seventh Floor Existing tower block to be retained

Sixth Floor 32520.00

Fifth Floor 29730.00

Ninth Floor

Off white render Reference Sto colour 37307

Composite Aluminium Windows External frames: PPC Aluminium RAL 7031 Opaque panels: PPC aluminium RAL004 Obscure glazing (projecting bay windows only): Saint Gobain textured glass reference "Arena"

Brise Soleil. Aluminium PPC RAL7004

Rheinzink Blue Grey zinc standing seam cladding including parapet and cill pressings

Fence - metal railings. Entrance gate. Galvanised steel, PPC black

Escape stairs and balustrades galvanised steel

Plant

Aluminium RWP. PPC RAL7004

Glass plank.Profilit Clear Opal

Seventh Floor 35310.00

Pale grey brick_type B Florian Meteor

Brick banding - Ibstock Atlas Smooth Blue

Existing tower block to be retained

38100.00

Off white render Reference Sto colour 37307

Composite Aluminium Windows External frames: PPC Aluminium RAL 7031 Opaque panels: PPC aluminium RAL004 Obscure glazing (projecting bay windows only): Saint Gobain textured glass reference "Arena"

Fence - metal railings. Entrance gate. Galvanised steel, PPC black

Fifth Floor

Escape stairs and balustrades galvanised steel

Plant

Aluminium RWP. PPC RAL7004

Existing Third Floor

24150.00

4 1

Second Floor Proposed

01 07.08 2015 7

15.07 2015

First Floor Proposed 6

PLANNING

Second Floor Proposed

North East Elevation 1 : 100

6 6

Ground Floor

310 Linton House, 164/180 Union Street London SE1 0LH

01 07.08 2015 00

15.07 2015

First Floor Proposed

Planning

SCALE

1314 (06)151 DWG. NO.

Plant

Aluminium RWP. PPC RAL7004

Fifth Floor

Glass plank.Profilit Clear Opal

00 REVISION

South East Elevation 1 : 100

Off white render Reference Sto colour 37307

Composite Aluminium Windows External frames: PPC Aluminium RAL 7031 Opaque panels: PPC aluminium RAL004 Obscure glazing (projecting bay windows only): Saint Gobain textured glass reference "Arena"

Fence - metal railings. Entrance gate. Galvanised steel, PPC black

Escape stairs and balustrades galvanised steel

Plant

Existing Third Floor

Aluminium RWP. PPC RAL7004

Glass plank.Profilit Clear Opal

24150.00 7

Second Floor Proposed

First Floor Proposed 01 07.08 2015 00

Ground Floor

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10

15.07 2015

18300.00

Planning

North West Elevation 1 : 100

01 07.08 2015

Draft issued for comment and coordination

Ground Floor

South West Elevation

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

310 Linton House, 164/180 Union Street London SE1 0LH

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10

PROJECT

South East Elevation

PROJECT

North West Elevation

DRAWING

South West Elevation

DRAWING

1:100 SCALE

1314 (06)153 DWG. NO.

DRAWING

07/08/15 DATE

00 REVISION

1:100 SCALE

1314 (06)152

CHECKED

07/08/2015 13:03:15

DWG. NO.

07/08/2015 13:01:38

Planning Draft issued for comment and coordination

PLANNING

1 : 100

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10

PROJECT

CHECKED

15.06 2015

14600.00

PLANNING

Pale grey brick_type B Florian Meteor

Brick banding - Ibstock Atlas Smooth Blue

21225.00

14600.00

310 Linton House, 164/180 Union Street London SE1 0LH

Fourth Floor

PLANNING

07/08/2015 13:00:48

Existing tower block to be retained

Sixth Floor

29730.00

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

DATE

Brise Soleil. Aluminium PPC RAL7004

Rheinzink Blue Grey zinc standing seam cladding including parapet and cill pressings

32520.00

14600.00

07/08/15

Pale grey brick_type A Florian Eris

26940.00

North East Elevation DRAWING

Metal cladding PPC aluminium Darker blue: RAL5007 Lighter blue: RAL5024 Grey infil panels RAL7004

18300.00

Draft issued for comment and coordination

497 LEA BRIDGE ROAD LONDON E10 PROJECT

35310.00

Fence - metal railings. Entrance gate. Galvanised steel, PPC black

Escape stairs and balustrades galvanised steel

STUDIO E ARCHITECTS LTD

1:100

Composite Aluminium Windows External frames: PPC Aluminium RAL 7031 Opaque panels: PPC aluminium RAL004 Obscure glazing (projecting bay windows only): Saint Gobain textured glass reference "Arena"

13 9

Ground Floor 14600.00

Off white render Reference Sto colour 37307

21225.00

18300.00 8

Eigth Floor 38100.00

Existing Third Floor 24150.00

First Floor Proposed

Brick banding - Ibstock Atlas Smooth Blue

Glass plank.Profilit Clear Opal

1 3

18300.00

Pale grey brick_type B Florian Meteor

Fourth Floor

40890.00

Sixth Floor

26940.00

Second Floor Proposed 21225.00

Rheinzink Blue Grey zinc standing seam cladding including parapet and cill pressings

29730.00

2 5

Planning Draft issued for comment and coordination

Brise Soleil. Aluminium PPC RAL7004

32520.00

Existing Third Floor

24150.00

Ninth Floor

43680.00

Seventh Floor

35310.00

Fourth Floor 26940.00

Roof Floor

Existing tower block to be retained

Fifth Floor

29730.00

Pale grey brick_type A Florian Eris

Seventh Floor

32520.00

Metal cladding PPC aluminium Darker blue: RAL5007 Lighter blue: RAL5024 Grey infil panels RAL7004

Eigth Floor

Sixth Floor

Ninth Floor 40890.00

Eigth Floor

26940.00

21225.00

Pale grey brick_type A Florian Eris

38100.00

Fourth Floor

Roof Floor 43680.00

40890.00

35310.00

Metal cladding PPC aluminium Darker blue: RAL5007 Lighter blue: RAL5024 Grey infil panels RAL7004

43680.00

38100.00

Roof Floor

07/08/2015

1:100

DATE

00 REVISION

SCALE

1314 (06)154

CHECKED

DWG. NO.

07/08/2015 13:05:26

Floor finishes

Windows Schedule for Tender

07/08/15 DATE

00 REVISION

BS CHECKED

The project is located in Fatih Forest in Istanbul,Fatih Forest is a large natural area that is in the middle of Istanbul which is an uncommon metropol paradise. Inside the forest,the area called Park Orman is a concert,festival and activity space out of city routines. Project contains Food & Beverage Units and a Multifunctional Hall. F&B Units are on the road to concert arena and Multifunctional Hall is located in the entrance of the Natural Park. The concept and settlement of the F&B Units are designated by the location of the trees in area. The goal of the project is not to cut down any three and designing temporary structures that can be removed or replaced.

PARK ORMAN arkiZON Mimarlik Park Orman Project (Meeting Area of the Park (Food & Beverage and Multifuctional Hall ),2013 Design Team:Emin Balkis,Elvan Caliskan (Owners) Volkan Taskin,Ali Onalp,Frederik De Smedt,Elvan Ariker

A_1

A_2

basement plan

site plan

Food and Beverage Units

B_1

B_2

section ground floor plan

A_2 43

Multifunctional Hall

Section

Elevation

ground floor plan

basement plan

1.basement plan

Campus life envisages building up a new educational network which encourages the mobility between different classrooms for different courses,which is not common in the formal Turkish educational system.As the slopy topography of the given land and the hot climate of the region obstruct the pedestrian movement,the units of the campus should be joined to each other within encouraging proximities and through comfortable connections. Accordingly, the main aim has been to organize all the units compactly enabling the maximum accessibility with minimum circulation, which would assure maximum interaction in-between units rather than spreading them evenly through the site. Compared to the scattered systems, a compact organization would be economical due to the efficiency in running costs,ecological due to the low base area, safer as it would be easily controllable and comfortable as it provides closer proximities. In addition, it has been found useful as a fundamental notion which could create the density and diversity that the urbanlife proposes.Settlement decisions has been made assuming that the students would be using shuttles for transportation. COMPACT CAMPUS has been located closer to the top of the hill to be in maximum relation with the flat areas on the terrain paying attention to its harmony with the topography. 46

COMPACT CAMPUS arkiZON Mimarlik Mugla-Milas High School Campus National Architectural Competition,2013 Design Team:Emin Balkis,Elvan Caliskan (Owners) Volkan Taskin,Ali Onalp,Ipek Glaister,Elvan Ariker, Batu Kepekcioglu

classes dorms sport &health conferance hall Scince labs library art and activities

Science Lab

Day-care cen Library

Art & Activities

Conferance Hall

Dining Hall

Program ruler

public usage private usage (inside school)

pedesterian axes pavement circulation landscape axes

Service-Drop onn and off car circulation for visiting

nter

Administration

Sport & Health

-19.00 (+155) 2.basement floor plan

-14.00 (+160) 1.basement floor plan

-4.00 (+170) 2.ground floor plan

1-1 section

2-2 section

3-3 section

4-4 section

5-5 section

0.00 (+174) ground floor plan

teachers’ room

natural light galleries

classes teachers’ wc

wc 24m2 in every core

room

occupation education

hall

manager canteen vertical room circulation

class units service units core

open areas terraces

2 canteens for every floor occupation education

typical dorm plan

typical classes plan

Considering Milas’ climate,there is a cooling problem instead of heating.Sunblinds have been used on the facades of classes (which are exposed to direct summer sunlight ) depending on tacticity of the sun. Sun blinding systems are differ from every facade depending on sun directions.Terraces has used on south facade which has the sun with right angle.Sunblinds that can open and close have been offered on east and west facades which have the sunlight horizontally.

funnel efect

summer sun 76’

solar collectors green roof

winter sun 29’

light galery

solar collectors

cooler suspended ceiling

rain collection pool

water tank

ary

Marc

Novem

June

ber

Dece mber

W I Ja NTE nu R ar y

Febru

SU M Ju ME ly R

N M TU ber AU cto O

winter spring summer

autumn

mbe

bush

Septe

winter spring summer

ust

autumn

Aug

grass+ flowers

RENDERS Studio E Architects James Allen’s Girls’ School-A new multi-purpose hall and music teaching facilities for the high performing James Allen’s Girls’ School. Project (2016)

Architecture itself provides shelter from capricious environment. The built structure mediates between the environmental conditions of inside and outside. This makes the build structure a connector-interstitial space. The project means to investigate the role of shell in architecture through the new direction of contemporary architecture that is adaptive, autonomous, dynamic and responsive. For the making of architecture, when we come to know that built structure (the shell) is a connector, then our effort to design that connector should be how to make a better connection. The aim of the project is to challenge the perception of concrete shell structures as a flat thin surface without any openings, as well as their basic forms and the idea of covering big spaces without subdivisions. It seeks to investigate a new methodology that replaces the limited conception of the traditional shell structures in light of the potentials of natural structures.It proposes to create a 3D perforated â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;thick concrete shellâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; that generates a system and can cover functional, structural and formal needs. 58

INTERSTITIAL ITERATIONS The Bartlett School of Architecture_UCL M.Arch Graduate Architectural Design Research Cluster 5, 2014 In collaboration with Chiara Zaccagnini,Sandra Sifakis Tutors:Phillippe Morel Thibault Schwartz,Kwang Guan Lee

image 10 - Polymer foam (http://oasys2.confex.com/acs/238nm/techprogram/P1273327.HTM)

interstitial investigation on the relationship of insdide and outside space

thin shell

openings

thick shell

subdivisions

cellular foam structures

The research started investigating the potentials of natural cellular structures as a strategy for design. In particular have been investigated the Foam Structures. All of those structures have different characteristics that could be used for creating 3D perforated structures on a wide range of design scales. The analysis on thin concrete shell structures, which began to appear in the 1920s helps to designate the thick concrete shell concept.A thin shell concrete structure, is a structure composed of a relatively thin shell of concrete, usually with no interior columns or exterior buttresses. The shells are most commonly flat plates and domes, but may also take the form of ellipsoids or cylindrical sections. Inserting the problematic of defining in-between space in thin concrete shell conception brings the possibility to make more than a thin concrete shell, a skin of concrete. Design a three - dimensional concrete lattice that challenges the perception of concrete shells as large scale objects used for spanning large areas. It inspires the design of a structure that creates openings, space subdivisions and perforations.

interstitial investigation on the relationship of insdide and outside space

It is intented to create a three-dimensional lattice shell that is a densely interconnected architectural structure, which responds to the material and architectural scale as well as the spatial organization. A recursive system is required in order to achieve this desired scale variation.

packing simulations-self -arrangement

The geometrical definition though is not viable for the arrangement of ballons.Therefore a stochastic,more random distribution is preferable. Adding to this complex reasoning the behavior that the materiality of the spheres introduces an additional element to the process. Finally through physics simulation various packing configurations can be investigated using different proportions and size of spheres. sphere proportions

Liquid Simulations-Understanding of liquid (concrete) behaviour

Many packing options were tested to reveal variety of lattice configurations that they could produce. First it was tested a series of same size spheres packing and later mixed sizes sphere packing. A series of sections were used to visualise the lattice internal structure and to identify where it was continuous or broken..

Thick Concrete Shell-4 layers of Organization Formfinding-Membranes

Frame 1

Frame 5

Frame 10

Frame 15

Frame 20

Frame 25

Frame 1

Frame 5

Frame 10

Frame 15

Frame 20

Frame 25

Frame 1

Frame 5

Frame 10

Frame 15

Frame 20

Frame 25

Frame 1

Frame 5

Frame 10

Frame 15

Frame 20

Frame 25

Frame 1

Frame 5

Frame 10

Frame 15

Frame 20

Frame 25

The thick concrete shell is the result of the combination different size layers of organisation. Membranes shape the space configuration according to variable architectural requirements, defining the size and geometry through a parametric highly controlled procedure. Elastic spheres formulate the void, carving away material from the concrete volume, resulting in a new material topology this of a reticulated three - dimensional concrete lattice. The two inflated membranes are designed through a highly controlled digital simulation. Membranes are simulated as a grid of springs with specific strength and elasticity. They are inflated with a certain pressure in order to obtain the desired form. Springs characteristics can be modified according to the required result. Same with the controlling points of the membranes that can be used with various ways.

5 6

F10

F11

F12

F13

F14

F15

F16

F17

F18

F19

F20

F21

F22

F23

F24

6 6

One of the options that shows the combination of the different strategies on formfinding process.Circle diameters is parametically changeable depending on design and functional needs.

Thick Concrete Shell-4 layers of Organization Deterministic & Stochastic Level

2nd membrane

stochastic level

stable level

1st membrane

The deterministic level of organisation of the spheres is placed following the functions and requirements that are reflected on the lower membrane. Subdivisions, openings, water tanks and vegetation capsules are created from accurately placed ballons. The stochastic level is responsible for the principal reticulation of the concrete lattice. The packing is simulated with soft - bodies interacting between them and the colliding objects of membranes and stable balloons.

plan

deterministic & stochastic level plan

stable(deterministic) level

membranes

deterministic & stochastic level

stochastic level

section 01

section 02

section 03

section 04

section 05

pouring concrete on shell-pouring points

shad

Liquid simulation is used in order to predict and understand the results of the organisation of the components. The pouring points are chosen according to the curvature of the inflated membranes and the packing configurations. The liquid should reach the lower membranes in approximately the same time lapse so the weight of the concrete is evenly distributed during casting.

section 01

section 02

section 03

packing functions-attribution of functions to the packing catagories

section 03

dow

section 02

section 01

water tank openings

subdivision

garden capsule

openings

http://www.habitatdesign.com/2012/04/spheres-for-the-garden/

http://www.davidharber.co.uk/sculpture/sphere.htm

The area is located on the Ankara route, situated north of Antalya. This road not only works as an axis which connects the city to the shore, but it also has many important boulevards. The land is located outside of Antalyaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s urban areas, this is imperative because it is not possible to build the station in the city center due to the strict urbanisation. The land is surrounded by industrial sites, slums and shanty house settlements, this gives it the atmosphere of a station that has become intergrated to the city much later on. Besides, because of its location, the project is on the contrary of the known usual stations,that is not inside of the busy urban movement area,so it also gains the attribute of an interchange station which provides the interaction between the commuters who use the train,city center and other types of transport. Antalya has a typical mediterranean climate. The summers are hot and dry, the winters are mild and rainy. Heat is a major problem for Antalya. The average heat is 18.7 C. The main wind direction is north/northwest. Research has been done in context of the problems and gathered data. Design approach has derived by the problematic of hot climate,interaction of different types of transportation and pedesterian circulation. â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Formation on the spaces leftover of the movement areas â&#x20AC;&#x2DC; is aimed thus the building would be behaved like an element to designate the circulation. 70

ANTALYA TRAIN STATION Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Diploma Project,2012 Jury:Doc.Dr. Haydar Karabey ,Doc.Dr. Oğuz Ozer Doc.Dr. Kayahan Turkantoz ,Yrd.Doc.Dr. Suat Cakır Yrd.Doc.Dr. Gulşen Gulmez An interchange station that provides the interaction between the passanger and city

Antalya settlement

Highway network

1)Main road access to the station

2)Changing the tram stop Because the crossroad before and after the station is far away, it is hard to access the collector road next to the station. It will be hard to reach the train station for the passengers who gets off the existing tram stop,but also it is necessary to get access to tram and bus for the people who live around the train station area.

Tram Lines

3)How different types of transport will interact

project land

canopy

building

pedesterian circulation track

motor vehicle track

car park

2.floor plan

ground floor plan

c-c section

a-a section

canopy formation

vertical circulation schema

pedestrian horizontal circulation schema

the circulation axes of the pedestrian around the side the circulation axes of the passangers of the station Entrance and exits of the station building

views

TIME CONSIDERATION CENTER Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University 3rd year Project,2010 Tutor:Prof.Halit Yasa Ersoy The project proposes an alternative consideration of time unit.

The project, was initiated with a desire to create an alternative space to spend time in. When the present-day human needs, complaints and actions are taken into consideration, it can be said that a ‘NEW HUMAN’ model has started to form. In the new world, time passes by very quickly, people are in a constant rush and they live in a world w here everything comes their feet, without stopping and thinking for a minute.In their spare time they throw themselves into shopping malls and they prefer to live in residences that they can find everything in one big place. Instead of running out and the riding their bikes, they prefer to use their treadmills in their basements.Even though,they have all these forms of technology and lifestyles,they complain about something,even which they dont know themsleves. The reason of the complaint is ‘restlessness’ which is caused by this life-cycle, because when people move away from human nature with every step, they become restless.This chronic restlessness begins with the minimizing the use of their senses. There is so much visual and sensory confusion that is created by themselves, they can not even detect anything which is pure and clean. For the purpose of creating an awareness and irony, the project is located in Ortakoy where the visual and sensory pollution is felt very intensely, perhaps the most widely felt in Istanbul. The project is a center that aims to show people what man has done to nature and environment, to question the new world, to devote time to himself.

The project is located in the area of a pharmaceutical factory in Ortakoy. The natural topography of the land was completely changed and flattened. The factory is surrounded by high supporting walls.

existing site plan

Mass distribution, and the spaces of the project, were inspired from the principle of a clock. The project was designed as a self activating system. The working principles of the clock (in other words the logical connection of how the cogs work together) were adapted to the intertwined relations between the functions and the area through different layers and elevations. The construction was hid under the earth by the light of the idea that ‘’pure perception and inner peace can be protected by nature’’. So,a simple green space which preserves the natural slope is wanted to create. The project is designed in such a way that people can also feel the construction beneath them while laying down, running and playing, spending time as they wish.BASIC FORMS’ were selected on the basis of the plan and form. Because the building is beneath the surface, to carry on the sand load, exposed concrete is used. Also it supports the minimalist approach.

functions diagram

apartures

cinemas

cafe & restourant

corridor

exhibition halls

exits

view from street

2.20 level plan

8.20 level plan side plan

5.20 D E 5.20

sections C

5.20 level plan D

mass diagram The corridor connects the exhibition area with three different elevations and two triangular aperture that connect with the land . Each exhibition area has its own mezzanine floor which has access to the corridor. The big aperture at the end of the corridor is connected the movie theater, cinema lounge and the topography. The two apertures are not only the circulation areas that connect the floors each other, there is also an entrance hall. Emerging from the earth as a single form the cafĂŠ and restaurant will be built with terraces on top, the site will be a combination of green, grey* cement* and earth. The cinema exits function as emergency exits, they also create a transparent showroom above the ground. The apertures above the exhibition spaces are accompanied by two main rectangular apertures provide to have natural light in the underground mass.

leveling diagram

A-A section

C-C section

E-E section

D-D section

B-B section

We are proposing a networked collaborative of ‘coming together’ to occupy the lost-spaces of Calgary.The coming together works in two ways - one as a working-meeting hub where the spontaneous encounters are fostered and the second as a local community forum for direct socio-political inputs from residents. The contemporary city of the digital era accommodates a variety of ‘work spaces’ excluding the offices themselves; such as the cafes, home-offices or parks, which had other functions. Thanks to the mobile workstations -laptops and smartphones-, the individual needs nothing but a surface to work on. Even the temporary or transitory spaces such as bus stops or passages get filled with people ‘waiting’, checking emails or working through mobile devices. The city has unconsciously transformed into an office field! The leftover spaces of the city may well be occupied by people working and networking. Solution: Collaborative Co-Working spaces – non-commercial network of spaces well thought for working-meetingwaiting. An individual should have the opportunity to have a say in Calgary: on where and how he/she lives. Local forums and centres in communities of Calgary occupy part of the leftover spaces. 86

CALGARY COLLABORATIVE SPACE NETWORK An Ideas Competition for Collaborative Teams to Re-envision Calgary’s Remnant Public Spaces In collabration with Irem Dokmeci,2015 A networked collaborative of ‘coming together’ to occupy the lost-spaces of Calgary.

Virtual Network

Physical Network

This coming together is enhanced on two levels -one as a physical network occupying the left-over spaces of the city and the second as a virtual network - interface through which the people of Calgary would be connecting.

Residential city setaside:The major land use of Calgary is residential and the set aside spaces that are not used create a good opportunity for the local people to gather. We think such local forums could build up an atmosphere of direct democracy, considering the Communities of Calgary.

In between two buildings: Downtown hosts many of these street-like spaces, which are currently used partially as car-parks or not used at all. In the heart of the city centre, these spaces would have a high traffic of users, which gives a high possibility of spontaneity and meet-ups. Still maintaining the transit function, the hub would create an ideal waiting space or a central meeting-point for the people of Calgary.

Light Rail Stops: Extends from the downtown to the suburban areas and reaches to a medium density of residents. This type of lost space which is used as a transit-waiting space holds a great potential to enable waiting individuals spend more valuable time by providing them a comfortable surface, while they are â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;virtually networkingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;.

Traffic Leftovers: They form the largest area of remnant spaces in the city to use for the Calgary Hubs and occur in almost every community of Calgary. Unlike the former options, they provide better conditions for a concentrated use and could be used by a large number of people at the same time. These spaces provide an opportunity to include larger work and meeting surfaces, and even semi-enclosed brainstorming areas for groups. 89

The worktop or surface is the first element of the proposal. Our idea of networking supports the spontaneous encounters between people; which brings the concept of the continuous working surface 6 Categories of surface is defined according to their functions: Single Workstation, Meeting Point, Small Meeting Table, Large Meeting Table, Brainstorming Room and Forum. Height and size of these surfaces are defined for standardization. The second main element is the enclosure, to shelter the users from changing weather conditions of Calgary, also to host any infrastructural need such as electricity, or network. Wood as a sustainable material is used to create the enclosure. Horizontal timber beams stack up in a dome-like structure. Openings are provided for letting sunlight where necessary. A tensile translucent fabric layer is designed inside for weather protection. Vertical Timber sections structurally make possible the construction of the shelter as they interlace with the horizontal elements. Aiming a unity in material use and design, the timber beams extend inside the pavilion and form the surfaces for work and meeting. 90

Trafic Leftover

Light Rail Stop

In-between Building

Residental Set-aside

1.Shape

2.Offset

3.Entrance

4.Wood Stripes

5.Units

6.Surface Arrangement

7.Surfaces

8.Opennings