Food from the Radical Center by Gary Paul Nabhan

GARY PAUL NABHAN

FOOD HHHHHH

from the

HHHHHH

RADICAL CENTER

HE A L I N G O UR L AN D and C OMMU NITIE S

About Island Press

Since 1984, the nonprofit organization Island Press has been stimulating, shaping, and communicating ideas that are essential for solving environmental problems worldwide. With more than 1,000 titles in print and some 30 new releases each year, we are the nation’s leading publisher on environmental issues. We identify innovative thinkers and emerging trends in the environmental field. We work with world-renowned experts and authors to develop cross-disciplinary solutions to environmental challenges.

Island Press designs and executes educational campaigns in conjunction with our authors to communicate their critical messages in print, in person, and online using the latest technologies, innovative programs, and the media. Our goal is to reach targeted audiences—scientists, policymakers, environmental advocates, urban planners, the media, and concerned citizens—with information that can be used to create the framework for long-term ecological health and human well-being.

Island Press gratefully acknowledges major support from The Bobolink Foundation, Caldera Foundation, The Curtis and Edith Munson Foundation, The Forrest C. and Frances H. Lattner Foundation, The JPB Foundation, The Kresge Foundation, The Summit Charitable Foundation, Inc., and many other generous organizations and individuals.

Generous support for the publication of this book was provided

by Margot and John Ernst.

The opinions expressed in this book are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of our supporters.

Island Press’ mission is to provide the best ideas and information to those seeking to understand and protect the environment and create solutions to its complex problems. Click here to get our newsletter for the latest news on authors, events, and free book giveaways. Get our app for Android and iOS.

Food from the Radical Center

Food from the Radical Center Healing Our Land and Communities

Gary Paul Nabhan

Washington | Covelo | London

Copyright Š 2018 Gary Paul Nabhan All rights reserved under International and Pan-­American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher: Island Press, 2000 M St., NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20036.

ISLAND PRESS is a trademark of the Center for Resource Economics.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018948926 All Island Press books are printed on environmentally responsible materials.

Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Generous support for the publication of this book was provided by Furthermore: a program of the J. M. Kaplan Fund.

Keywords: rural urban divide, restoration, diversity, natural capital, biocultural conservation, food producing capacity, gardening, farmland, fencerows, soil health, bison, sturgeon, ancient grains, agriculture

Then I heard a voice say to me, “Francesco, go and restore this sacred place, for as you can see, it has fallen into disrepair.”

—­St. Francis of Assisi What needs restoring, to me, is not American nature, but “the nature of America.”

—­Andrew C. Revkin, in After Preservation Can we continue to do the hard work of coming together in the name of both community and land? Can we even do more of it? My guess is that we can because, if we pause to listen and honestly reflect, most of us believe that community and land are both sacred, that both must be honored.

—­Charles F. Wilkinson, in Stitching the West Back Together How do we awaken from the dream of separateness, from an abiding sense that the chasm that exists between us cannot be reconciled? For it would seem that the gulf in our present age could not be wider between “Us” and “Them.” How do we tame the status quo that lulls us into blindly accepting the things that divide us and keep us from our own holy longing for the mutuality of kinship—­a sure and certain sense that we belong to each other?

—­Gregory Boyle in Barking to the Choir: The Power of Radical Kinship

Contents Acknowledgments xi Introduction: Conservation You Can Taste 1 Chapter 1. A Land Divided 9 Chapter 2. Farming in the Radical Center 19 Chapter 3. Will Work for Dirt 31 Chapter 4. Replenishing Water and Wealth 45 Chapter 5. Bringing Back the Bison 57 Chapter 6. Teach a Community to Fish 69 Chapter 7. Plant Midwives 81 Chapter 8. Strange Birds Flock Together 91 Chapter 9. Herders of Many Cultures 101 Chapter 10. Immigrant Grains 109 Chapter 11. Urban Growers and Rare Fruits 123 Chapter 12. Return of the Pollinators 135 Chapter 13. You Can Go Home Again 149 Appendix. The Conservation Couplets 163 Literature Cited 167 Index 179

ix

Acknowledgments As my tenure as a writer has advanced since my very first poem was published in response to the Cuban missile crisis, I find a certain solace in working with editors, promoters, and publishers who I have found to be true collaborators. And so my gratitude pours out to Emily Turner and Jaime Jennings and to the other fine, bright, compassionate individuals at Island Press. In a world in which the very act of publishing has become a depersonalized and increasingly top-­down endeavor, independent presses are a refreshing and much-­needed antidote to despair.

Early in my career as a conservationist, a number of fast friends coached me in the art of collaborative, community-­based conservation and restoration. Their guidance did not necessarily keep me from making mistakes, but they encouraged me to learn from my mistakes: Tom Sheridan, Laura Monti, James Mason, Cynthia Anson, Hope Shand, Susan Kunz, Exequiel Escurra, Luther Probst, Wendy Laird, Vernon Masayesva, Melissa Nelson, Rick and Heather Knight, Dan Daggett, Courtney White, Wendy and Warner Glenn, Mandy and Jim Metzger, Makale Faber, Richard McCarthy, Curt Meine, Peter Forbes, Nathan Sayre, Ina Warren, Richard Collins, Maribel Alvarez, Chip Taylor, Peter Raven, Jonathan Mabry, Derrick Widmark, Dennis Moroney, and Mace Vaughn. I also thank my spiritual mentors for their guidance over the years: Richard Purcell, Jim Corbett, Nelson Foster, Dave Denny and

xi

xii

acknowledgments

Tessa Bielecki, John Fife, Nancy Menning, Shoshanah Kay, Richard Rohr, Doug Christie, and Martin Mosko. Blessings to you all.

I visited many people and projects in the field to gain a fresh sense of where collaborative restoration was going. For soil and water work, I am indebted to Brad Lancaster, Joe Quiroga, Ron Pulliam, Valer Clark, Laura Norman, Fred Bahnson, John Wick, Caleb Weaver, Bill Zeedyk, and David Seibert. For their work with bison recovery, I am grateful to Hugh “Sunny” Fitzsimons, Kent Redford, Andy Wilkinson, and the many members of the Intertribal Bison Council. For wild food plant restoration, I am grateful to Joyce LeCompte and her multicultural camas incubator team: Patty West, Teresa DeKoker, Robin Kimmerer, DeJa Walker, Nancy Turner, and Kat Anderson. For fish recovery, I have benefited from the fine work done by Doug Duncan, Ross Timmons, Ian Park, Mark Steiger, and Jamie Bartolino. For their turkey recovery, I am proud to know Frank Reese Jr., Patrick Martins, Paula Johnson, and Glenn Drowns, as well as my fellow traveler Aubrey Krug. For their work on heirloom apples and dates, I am grateful to Kanin and Rafael Routson, Harry Polk, the Brophy and McChesney families, Eric Baard, Dan Bussey, John Bunker, Diane Flynt, Ben Watson, Tom Burford, Lee Calhoun, Jim Veteto, and Chuck and Charlotte Shelton. For work with heritage grain recovery, I thank Thom Leonard, Amadeo Rea, Glenn Roberts, David Shields, Jeff and Emma Zimmerman, Ramona and Terry Buttons, Don Guerra, Roland Chambers, Michelle Ajamian, Sally Fox, and Monica Spiller. For pollinator work, I thank Stephen Buchmann, Mrill Ingram, Ina Warren, Rodrigo Medellin, David Suro, Paul and Elizabeth Kaiser, Homero and Betty Aridjis, Mace Vaughn, Eric Mader, Chip Taylor, Laura Jackson, Claire Kreman, Steve Buckley, John Anderson, Sam Earnshaw, Joanne Baumgartner, and Francesca Claverie.

My work on these topics has been blessed by support over the decades from the MacArthur Foundation, Pew Charitable Trust, Haury Fund, Christensen Fund, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Packard Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Biophilia Foundation, and CS Fund.

chapter

7

Plant Midwives Have you ever been hiking and stopped in your tracks to gaze at wildflowers so vibrant and abundant that you couldn’t keep your eyes off of them? Did their delicate petals bring out the color in other lives found around you—­the deer, the seed-­eating sparrows, the other hikers making their way along the trail?

And was it just their beauty or also their scent—­exuded for bees and butterflies—­that told you that one day you too might taste this sweetness?

In late May 2017, ethnobotanist Joyce LeCompte offered me an opportunity to see such a sight and take a deep whiff of such a delectable fragrance. We hightailed it out of Seattle early one morning to rendezvous with others at the Glacial Heritage Reserve in the South Puget Sound area of western Washington.

There, the native plant in lavish bloom was the blue camas lily—­Camassia quamash—­the signature flower of wet prairie meadows in the Pacific Northwest. That spring, camas seemed to be blooming and blanketing the entire meadow in every direction we turned.

As far as our eyes could see, their six-­petaled flowers added hues of pale lilac, violet blue, and deep purple to the vivid greens and subtle tans of the open prairie.

81

82

food from the radical center

If you happened to arrive at the reserve unfamiliar with the restoration project happening there, you could easily assume that it was first and foremost about the restoration of beauty. After all, who could object to preserving the jaw-­dropping, heart-­pounding natural beauty of this world we live in?

The beauty of camas lilies was not ignored by previous generations of both residents in and travelers to western Washington. As early as the 1850s, camas lily bulbs were being dug up and shipped everywhere from the Atlantic seaboard to England to grace ornamental gardens.

But don’t get me wrong; this camas lily is not just another pretty face to be sent off to Some Place Else. Its ultimate value may lie in its ability to combat adult-­onset diabetes among the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest. The complex carbohydrates in camas roots slow the digestion and absorption of glucose, flattening blood sugar levels and potentially reducing stress on the pancreas.

In addition to being a traditional food of great significance to First Nations communities along the Pacific North Rim, it may be a key factor in their future health. More than twenty indigenous cultures in western Canada and the US still tend, collect, clean, and pit-­roast its bulbs for special seasonal events. Many of these communities hope that camas can help keep their children free of diabetes.

Of course, some of these intertribal “root festivals” have been taking place for centuries and millennia. But now, the bulbs are being dried and stored for families to eat year-­round as one more means to deal with nutrition-­related diseases.

Camas is just one of those “cultural keystone plants” that is both deeply intertwined with both indigenous health and the environmental health of the wet prairies. Thus the restoration of camas in wet prairies is linked to the restoration of human health for native communities who live in or near those landscapes.

plant midwives

And that is exactly why Joyce LeCompte of the University of Washington wrote an incubator grant to the Center for Creative Conservation: to bring together amazing women with diverse skills—­Frederica Bowcutt (botany), Taylor Goforth (environmental communications), Valerie Segrest (native nutrition), and Sarah Hamman (restoration ecology). Their own goal was to provide technical as well as social support to leaders interested in camas that are emerging in Coastal Salish tribal communities.

The multicultural team set out to restore this landscape with the appreciation that indigenous knowledge, stewardship, and use of these plants matter deeply to neighboring communities.

I doubt that it has escaped your notice, but historically, most “environmental remediation” projects were dominated by men—­albeit well-­ intended men—­who inadvertently practiced a top-­down management style that echoed the military as a whole and the Army Corps of Engineers in particular.

Under the auspices of “improving the environment” to control floods and stream flow, the Army Corps drained marshes and wet meadows while planting shrubs for game birds and to stabilize soil.

That’s exactly what plants like camas lilies do not need.

Few of these environmental engineers were even aware that local women were continuing to take their families out to harvest camas in places like the South Sound Prairies. As shrubs and Douglas firs moved in, camas lilies began to fade away, and harvesting became less frequent.

To reverse historic declines in camas and their traditional uses, Joyce and the other women who cohosted me have formed a multicultural “community of practice” for the edible plants and healing herbs of the South Sound Prairie.

I was heartened to see that these restoration and recovery efforts now involve dozens of indigenous harvesters, healers, and herbalists as well as land managers, botanists, wildlife biologists, fire ecologists, nutritional

83

84

food from the radical center

scientists, and ethnobotanical educators. They exemplify a trend that even the higher-­ups in the US Forest Services now embrace: that diverse membership in scientific communities fosters innovation and problem-­solving more effectively than communities with a narrow range of knowledge, skills, and experience.

In fact, many of the practitioners are women with a set of technical and experiential skills that ethnobotanist Kay Fowler calls “plant wifery.”

Elsewhere in the Pacific Northwest, ethnobotanist Madrona Murphy might be considered one of those “midwives.” As she herself has documented, “Tribes cultivated [camas] in large gardens, subdivided into family-­owned plots passed down through the generations. These were fertilized with seaweed, cleared of weeds and stones, and burned to control brush and grass.”

Building on these ancient practices, the women in Joyce’s entourage have initiated what they call “the Camas Prairie Cultural Ecosystems Incubator.” They are like traditional midwives who use plants to help “bring out of the incubator” and into full light fresh ways of engaging with other people and with the land.

Together they have crafted a stunning vision statement: “Drawing on western and indigenous ways of knowing, this project will foster the health of Salish Sea prairies and the wellbeing of people connected to them, through collaborative partnerships based in trust, reciprocity, and respect.”

As I watched this incubator team put their values into practice at the Glacial Heritage Reserve, I sensed that the women involved are first and foremost attentive to camas itself. They teach others that there is a culturally appropriate time to gather camas lily bulbs—­when the lower half of the blossoms have begun to fade.

Some First Nations communities stay alert to when it is time to sustainably harvest the bulbs by what they call the “Camas Moon.” They then begin to employ particular tools and techniques for gathering camas—­ones

plant midwives

that the “plant midwife” team demonstrated with their own digging sticks during our field trip.

When the digging is done properly, the bulbs pop out of the wet soil almost on their own. Historically, a knowledgeable camas digger could harvest as much as a bushel of bulbs a day from a gathering site of a half acre to an acre.

As some of these Coastal Salish restorationists already know, a traditionally managed gathering site should be cared for by clearing competing woody growth by hand or by burning, by replanting smaller bulbs, and by ensuring seasonal sheet flow of water across the site. They draw upon historic evidence that camas were grown by their ancestors in well-­ defined, meticulously cultivated populations that they tilled with digging sticks, hoed for weed control, and enhanced with bulbs they had collected from other nearby camas populations.

Patrick Dunn—­the program director with the Center for Natural Lands Management—­fully sanctions the use of these historic techniques and management strategies to bring camas back to their former abundance in the Glacial Heritage Natural Area. There, initial efforts have focused on reintroducing fire and engaging volunteers to thin invasive Douglas firs, which had grown up in the prairie during decades of fire suppression.

This particular restoration effort by the incubator team also has a social justice component. The program gets many of its native plants and seeds from inmates involved in the Sustainable Prisons Project, both reducing costs and building healthy relationships.

To be sure, the Camas Prairie Cultural Ecosystems Incubator team is also committed to human goals; they teach First Nations youth about the healing power and nutritional value of camas. A week after my visit to the camas prairie with Joyce, Sarah, Taylor, and Frederica, they hosted sixty tribal members from nine different tribes for both bulb harvesting and storytelling.

85

86

food from the radical center

The community is now drawing on both traditional knowledge and Western scientific knowledge to tend camas and restore the land. But unlike in many cases, Western science is not privileged over local, indigenous ways of understanding. Both were welcomed. Even the divide between human and nonhuman nature has shifted.

In the welcoming space that the incubator team provided, some of the participants opened themselves up to different perspectives about plants and people. Is camas not “just” a plant but a sentient being and cultural ally as well? Are the traditional practices of harvesting camas merely “consumptive” or are they “regenerative”? Is wild plant restoration a “scientific management operation” or a “lifelong practice”?

Only when trust is gradually and respectfully built among cultures can such questions be fully explored and the challenges of collaborative conservation be fully addressed. And that is exactly what the Camas Prairie Cultural Ecosystems Incubator team of women has wisely and patiently chosen to foster.

More than eighty-­two native species of once-­declining food plants are being recovered through restoration projects in North America today—­and many of the most successful efforts are led by women, especially women of color. Native American botanist and writer Robin Kimmerer has beautifully characterized the sensibility that they bring to such work: “The people remaining on Earth must make a choice either to continue on the path that leads to destruction of life as we know it, or choose a different future—­one of renewal. It is said that as the remaining people choose the path toward life, they will turn back along the road from which they have come and begin to pick up the pieces that have been scattered along the road—­remnants of language, the old stories and songs, seeds and ragged patches of plants, wandering animals and birds, and collectively, they will put the world together again.”

plant midwives

Of Anishinabe ancestry, Robin calls this process reciprocal restoration, for it is the “mutually-­reinforcing restoration of land and culture, such that the repair of ecosystem services contributes to cultural revitalization, and renewal of culture promotes ecological integrity.”

It is not surprising to me that women of color all over the world have taken the lead in building such reciprocities, especially in the collaborative practice of restoring habitats. Ghent University scholars Nicky Broeckhaven and Ann Cliquet have documented how gender equity can make ecological restoration more effective. Adding a diversity of perspectives—­especially those of women from various backgrounds—­to restoration initiatives fosters innovation both in research and in hands-­on practice.

And yet, as Broeckhaven and Cliquet concede, a significant hurdle remains. It is “time to connect the dots” and fully empower women of all ages to play leadership roles in environmental stewardship and restoration.

Broeckhaven and Cliquet are not alone in their call. Even the World Bank, a notoriously top-­down multinational organization, concedes that natural resource management is still too often dominated by men. The World Bank calls for rebalancing gender roles in fields such as ecological restoration and wild food plant recovery, noting that men have historically been the ones with more power, training, and access to technology.

But for restoration to be successful, we need more equitable relationships among men and women (and the cultural groups they represent).

In short, our society can and must do more to ensure that women have an equal voice in ecological restoration, particularly women who understand the value of wild foods and the communities who depend on them. And frankly, as a male of Arab descent who was probably slow to fully fathom the significance of such issues, I no doubt missed out on a lot of learning.

In my own region, I must credit my colleagues Patty West, Teresa DeKoker, and Zsusi Kovacs—­as well as my wife Laurie Monti and my

87

88

food from the radical center

old friend Shelly Silbert—­with opening my eyes to methods of restoration that I never would have seen on my own.

In Flagstaff, Arizona, around 2002, Patty and I secured funding from the state to begin one of the country’s first Community-­Supported Wild Foraging (CSWF) projects, based loosely on the model of Community-­ Supported Agriculture. The year before, we had hosted a wildly successful community forum, in which we learned that $20 billion is spent each year on natural and organic foods, with wild foods gaining market shares in 130 countries around the world. Fiddleneck ferns, nettles, wild rice, ramps, prickly pear fruit, pinyon nuts, and other foods native to our area had made their way back into 73 percent of all the grocery stores in the US. We were all aware that the Ecological Restoration Institute at our university, along with the US Forest Service and many other agencies and tribal governments, was ramping up efforts to restore ponderosa pine forests and pinyon-­juniper woodlands in our region. Might we simultaneously harvest these foods while restoring forests on a large scale to reduce wildfire? Could “green jobs” for foragers be generated by an economic investment in restoration?

Even with such good intentions, our project initially got off to a rough start. Few of the land management agencies in our region were interested in opening public lands to foragers. Why? There was the knotty issue of potentially unsustainable harvesting that they had to deal with. My friend, botanist Lawrence Davis-­Hollander, had already warned us that wild ramps (native onions) were being rapidly depleted in public lands on the East Coast because of soaring market demand. Word of this problem had spread like wildfire among public lands managers.

Lawrence and others estimated that between eighteen thousand and twenty thousand pounds of the onions were being extracted from wildlands each year for use in New York City restaurants and markets. Overharvesting had spiked their prices as high as $12 per pound! The Forest

plant midwives

Service botanists we initially spoke with did not want any part in letting foragers loose on public lands to harvest plants for profit. Land managers were not enthused.

But while I was trying to figure out ways to defend our original plan to agency bureaucrats, Patty West took another tract that proved far more successful. Patty proposed that we gather invasives—­the berries, seeds, shoots, roots, and fruits of edible plants that had been accidentally introduced to forest lands. These included Siberian blackberries, horseradish, tumbleweed, watercress, dandelions, and the like. She worked up a broader list and presented it to the Forest Service.

The answer from Forest Service scientists? Go for it, Patty. They were happy for us to not only “weed” out the invasive plants but also gather nonnative crayfish and bullfrogs. They would even give us locations where they wanted species reduced in order to recover more native species in restored habitats.

By the time Patty West and Teresa DeKoker received all the permits, maps, volunteer foragers, and paying shareholders to move the project forward, they had a plan for delivering fifty-­six wild products to twenty-­ three households and several restaurants over a fifteen-­week season. They also sold wild exotic foods through the Flagstaff Community Farmer’s Market and contacts with local chefs.

Soon we were organizing and celebrating a new seasonal event—­the Flagstaff Foraged Feast—­that offered samples of dozens of wild foods to more than two hundred residents. The project and the celebration continued to morph for several more years after state funding ended, and the Foraged Feast is still alive and well.

Patty West, the real “local hero” behind this foodshed restoration initiative, later summed up the effort in this manner: “We provided short-­ term [seasonal] jobs for rural residents . . . Our sales and educational booths at regional festivals and community fairs impacted over 1,000 people. We were featured by reporters on local radio and in regional

89

90

food from the radical center

newspapers, but news of the project went viral and was eventually covered by a National Public Radio program, Gourmet magazine, and High Country News. Finally, we developed a manual to help others start restorations projects like this in their own areas.”

Patty and Teresa trained dozens of volunteers how to forage ethically, in ways that were ecologically responsible but fun too, building community as they went. I could never have engaged as many chefs, backyard fermentation experts, herbalists, forest ecologists, restoration activists, and Native American healers as they did.

For me, the real hallmark of their genius came when they joined forces with the Grand Canyon Wildlands Council. Together, they removed introduced crawdads and bullfrogs from Beaver Creek and put them in the hands of Slow Food chefs who cooked up New Orleans–­style gumbos and frog legs. More than fifty participants sat and enjoyed these foraged delicacies as Cajun musicians entertained us—­all in the very forest that was being restored. That, my friends, is conservation that you can not only taste but sing along to as well.

www.islandpress.org Phone: (202) 232-7933 Fax: (202) 234-1328 Island Press 2000 M Street NW Suite 650 Washington, DC 20036

BRIDGE THE POLITICAL DIVIDE THROUGH FOOD

HARDCOVER: $28.00 PAGES: 256 PUBLISHING: SEPTEMBER 2018 ISBN: 9781610919197

USE PROMOCODE

2240

4NABHAN $ SAVE 20%

PRICE NOW

Food from the Radical Center Healing Our Land and Communities Gary Paul Nabhan

A

merica has never felt more divided. But in the midst of the acrimony comes a promising new movement. In Food from the Radical Center, Gary Nabhan tells the

stories of communities who are bringing back North America’s unique fare. These restoration efforts that are uniting people from the left and right, rural and urban. As a leading thinker and practitioner in biocultural conservation, Nabhan offers a key perspective on the movement. He shares a vision of a new

FACEBOOK.COM/ISLANDPRESS TWITTER.COM/ISLANDPRESS

environmentalism that is just and inclusive, allowing former adversaries to commune over delicious foods.

Gary Paul Nabhan

G

ary Paul Nabhan is the Kellogg Endowed Chair at the University of Arizona’s Southwest Center. He is author or editor of more than thirty books, including Growing Food in a Hotter, Drier Land; Where Our Food Comes From; and

Renewing America’s Food Traditions. Honored with a MacArthur “genius” award, a Lannan Literary Fellowship, the John Burroughs Medal for nature writing, and other awards, Gary is recognized as the father of the local food movement.

More books of interest: Coming this fall!

The Food Sharing Revolution How Start-Ups, Pop-Ups, and Co-Ops are Changing the Way We Eat Michael S. Carolan A hopeful look at the ways the sharing economy can transform our food system and challenge corporate agriculture.

Where Our Food Comes From Retracing Nikolay Vavilov’s Quest to End Famine Gary Paul Nabhan Two explorers and the fate of the world’s food PAPERBACK: $26.00 (264 PAGES. 2011.

9781610910033.)

HARDCOVER: $28.00 (208 PAGES. 2018.

9781610918862.)

Biting the Hands that Feed Us How Fewer, Smarter Laws Would Make Our Food System More Sustainable Baylen J. Linnekin An exploration of U.S. food policy that reveals the unexpected ways regulations can thwart sustainable practices.

HARDCOVER: $30.00 (280 PAGES. 2016.

9781610916752.)

Replenish The Virtuous Cycle of Water and Prosperity Sandra Postel A renowned water expert looks at repairing our broken water cycle using nature’s rhythms HARDCOVER: $29.00 (336 PAGES. 2017.

9781610917902.)

Phone: 202.232.7933 Fax: 202.234.1328 Island Press 2000 M Street NW Suite 650 Washington, DC 20036