© IWA Publishing 2014 1
Water Practice & Technology Vol 9 No 1 doi: 10.2166/wpt.2014.001
Methods to accompany and evaluate planning of combined sewer overflow treatment concepts for complex sewer systems K. Klepiszewski, S. Seiffert, M. Regneri and E. Henry Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29, avenue J.F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg. E-mail: kai.klepiszewski@tudor.lu
Abstract Simulation tools are in common use to evaluate combined sewer overflow (CSO) treatment concepts in complex sewer systems. However, the planning of CSO structures in a sewer system is a matter of local constraints, expert knowledge and trial and error. Common standards only provide general recommendations to plan CSO structures and work out management strategies. Additionally, modelling the emissions of complex sewer systems tends to result in comprehensive findings. Although, it is essential to understand local behaviour and interaction of CSO structures in a system to improve local and overall performance there is a lack of tools to illustrate comprehensive simulation results in a simple way. In this context the methods presented here are developed. These include clear illustrations of the as-is state in the catchment using Sankey diagrams to show relevant volume and pollutant flows. Furthermore, loading and treatment indicators are suggested to illustrate local loading conditions and treatment capabilities of CSO structures in relation to the overall system. Additional emission indicators provide information on local emissions and show interactions of CSO structures. The results indicate that the suggested methods contribute to an efficient evaluation of interactions and performances to improve treatment strategies in the planning phase. Key words: performance indicators, planning complex sewer systems, substance flow analyses, visualization
INTRODUCTION Modelling volume and substance flows in sewer systems is widely applied to plan and evaluate combined sewer overflow (CSO) treatment concepts in complex sewer systems. Nevertheless, distribution of CSO structures in sewer systems, dimensioning of individual storage volume for CSO treatment and setting of CSO structures’ outflows to downstream sewer sections are a matter of local constraints, expert knowledge and trial and error. Detailed planning of CSO structures is strongly linked to local constraints in catchments and sewer systems. Common standards only provide general guidelines and recommendations to support the planning of CSO structures and work out management strategies. This is reflected in several national guidelines at European level (Germany & Luxembourg: ATV 1992; Great Britain: FWR 1998, France: CERTU 2004, Fanders/Belgium CIW 2012, Austria: OEWAV 2007). Furthermore, none of the standards provide detailed information on how to include the interaction between CSO structures of complex systems into the planning procedure. The dimensioning procedure specified in the German guideline A 128 (ATV 1992) for instance asks for long-term simulation ( 10a rain data) of complex sewer systems to mimic system behaviour and CSO emissions. Further, it demands (i) not to exceed a threshold of the total chemical oxygen demand (COD) load emitted by the sum of all CSOs of the system and (ii) to meet specific mixing ratios of rain weather flow and dry weather flow at individual CSO structures. Modelling volume and substance flows and resulting emissions of complex sewer systems tends to result in comprehensive findings. Since standard simulation tools for sewer systems are designed to