IZZAH SHAARI on Professional Architectural Works (2016 - 2019) izzah.shaari@gmail.com +60132978284
Kickstarted my career in architecture industry with DMP Architects for 3 years, I was exposed to developing design and managing project for high rise residential and commercial building. I was also part of company’s team for 3 design competition which 2 of them are residential masterplan. Focuses strongly on design stages, my passion lies in exploration of extensive design aspects from building massing to construction detail with consideration of various site condition, neighbourhood context, authority requirements and by-laws. Longing to experience comprehensive architectural services, I am looking to secure a position in architecture practice that exposes me to construction stages and further advancing my design skills alongside people who share the same purpose of building great and impactful project.
curriculum vitae curriculum vitae
izzah.shaari@gmail.com
curriculum vitae Shah Alam, Selangor
+60132978284
Kickstarted my career in architecture industry with DMP Architects for 3 years, I was exposed to developing design and managing project for high rise residential and commercial building. I was also part of company’s team for 3 design competition which 2 of them are residential masterplan. Focuses strongly on design stages, my passion lies in exploration of extensive designizzah.shaari@gmail.com aspects from building massing to construction detail with consideration of various site condition, Shah Alam, Selangor neighbourhood context, authority requirements and by-laws. +60132978284 Longing to experience comprehensive architectural services, I am looking to secure a position in architecture practice that exposes me to construction stages and further advancing my design skills alongside people who share the same purpose of building great and impactful project. Kickstarted my career in architecture industry with DMP Architects for 3 years, I was exposed to developing design
PROFILE PROFESSIONAL SKILLS and managing project for high rise residential and commercial building. I was also part of company’s team for
3D Rhinocerous, Sketchup, Revit Name Nur Izzah 3Mohd design Shaari competition which 2 of them areModelling residential masterplan. Drafting AutoCad, Revit,from Hand Drawn Birth Date 04 strongly Auguston 1990 Focuses design stages, my passion lies in 2D exploration of extensive design aspects to 35/2B, construction detail with consideration site condition, Rendering of variousVray Address 26,building Jalan massing Tun Teja Selangor requirements and by-laws. Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign Citizenship Malaysian neighbourhood context, authority Adobe Longing to experience comprehensive architectural services, I am looking to secure a position in Microsof Office Word, Powerpoint, Excel architecture practice that exposes me to construction stages and further advancing my design skills
alongside people who share the same purpose of building great and impactful project. EDUCATION 2014 - 2015 M. Architecture SOFTWARE APPLICATION Experienced every stages of architectural basic PROFILE RMIT University PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
Name Nur Izzah Mohd Shaari 2010 - 2013 BSc. Architectural Studies Birth Date 04 August 1990 IIUM Address Jalan TunMatriculation Teja 35/2B, Selangor 2008 - 2010 26, Architecture Citizenship Malaysian CFS IIUM
WORK AND EXPERIENCE EDUCATION
Graduate Architect Professional 2014 - 2015 M. Architecture 2016 - 2019 RMIT DMP Architect University Assistant ArchitectStudies Professional 2010 - 2013 BSc. Architectural 2013 - 2014 IIUM Zarina Architect Secretary Academic 2008 - 2010 Assistant Architecture Matriculation 2012 CAAEM CFS IIUMAccreditation Renewal Visit IIUM Participant AcademicAND WORK EXPERIENCE 2012 23th Architectural ArchitectWorkshop Professional Graduate 2016 - 2019 DMP UTM Architect Participant Academic Architect Professional Assistant 2013 - 2014 Zarina 24th Architectural Architect Workshop UPM Secretary Academic Assistant 2012 CAAEM Accreditation Renewal Visit IIUM Academic Participant 2012 23th Architectural Workshop UTM Academic Participant 2013 24th Architectural Workshop UPM
services including Rhinocerous, some suplimentary andRevit 3D Modelling Sketchup, additional services. 2D Drafting AutoCad, Revit, Hand Drawn Rendering Vray80% Concept and Design Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign Technical Drawings 10% Microsof Office Word, Project Management 10%Powerpoint, Excel
LANGUAGE SOFTWARE APPLICATION
English Superior Experienced every stages of architectural basic services suplimentary and Malay including some Superior additional services. Intermediate Arab Concept and Design 80% Technical Drawings 10%INFO JOB APPLICATION Position Applied / Project Architect Project Management Design 10% Availability Jan 2020 LAM No. LAM AG/N 588 LANGUAGE English Superior Malay Superior my.linkedin.com/in/izzahshaari Arab Intermediate issuu.com/izzahshaari
JOB APPLICATION INFO Position Applied Availability LAM No.
Design / Project Architect Jan 2020 LAM AG/N 588
izzah shaari . graduate architect ag/n 588
my.linkedin.com/in/izzahshaari issuu.com/izzahshaari
content
01/ equine | dd 02/ damansara west 1 | dd 03/ damansara perdana | competition 04/ cyberjaya | competition 05/ selayang | competition 06/ kepong | sd 07/ menjalara | sd 08/ kk | sd 09/ damansara west 2 | sd 10/ kk | sd 11/ wangsa | ccc 11/ wangsa | construction 12/ perspective works 13/ illustration works
01/equine
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MPSJ TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 11.47 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 3.97 Design Component: Retail, service apartment, affordable service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Design development OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. To finalize overall concept of development and detail up design for BP drawing documentation
FRONT VIEW
BLOCK A AND D
FACADE TREATMENT FOR ELEVATED PARKING
SIDE VIEW
BLOCK C AND D
BLOCK A, B AND F
BLOCK F
BLOCK E
02/damansara west 1
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MBSA TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 7.51 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 6 Design Component: Retail, service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Design development OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. To finalize overall concept of development and detail up design for BP drawing documentation
NIGHT SCENE
FENCING AND ENTRANCE GATE
ENTRANCE STATEMENT(DARK)
R3 G FLOOR RETAIL (DARK)
GUARDHOUSE
GUARD HOUSE (DARK)
R3 DROP OFF AREA(DARK)
SHOPL
DAY SCENE
LOTS AT GROUND AND FIRST LEVEL
R3
FACADE TREATMENT FOR ELEVATED PARKING
DROP OFF AREA
R3
R3
RETAIL FRONT(DARK)
PARKING AND FIRE STAIRCASE
PODIUM LOBBY A (DARK)
R3
MAIN LIFT LOBBY
Main lobby b (sales gallery scheme)
R3
SURAU
SURAU
R3
MULTI PURPOSE HALL
8TH FLOOR MULTIPURPOSE HALL
R3
GYMNASIUM
GYM ROOM
R3
DETAILS IN LIFT LOBBY AND APARTMENT CORRIDOR
R3
TYPICAL LIFT LOBBY
• •
•
1.7m
•
1.8m (H) vent block across all air well provide privacy Minimum plaster ceiling Unit 50mm raise from corridor Minimum reflected ceiling light
Typical corridor
Corridor and unit tiling and color scheme
Typical corridor (option 1)
Scheme A (cold)
Scheme A (warm)
03/damansara perdana
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MBPJ TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 2.66 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 4.7 Design Component: Retail, office, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. Competition
Empire Damansara 12-36 storey
PJ Trade Center 20-21 storey
via LDP
N
Menara Obyu 19 storey
7 pm
12 m
7 am
A both : 115,870 sqft / 2.66 a plot 1 : 52,707 sqft / 1.21 a plot 2 : 63,162 sqft / 1.45 a
noise from traffic
0m
via LDP
plot ratio allowable GFA :
via SPRINT required
381,214
CARP = 111
SITE ANA SITE ANAL rooftop garden
OFFICE HQ
OFFICE SUITE
atrium
office
podium garden
elevated parking
office lobby
basement parking
EXPLODED AXONOMETRICS EXPLODED AXONOME
CONCEPTUAL SECTION
SECTION
AREA acres acres acres
1:4.7 4 sqft
PARK 16 CP
AYSIS LYSIS
ETRIC
ATRIUM
NATURALLY ILLUMINATED ATRIUM
OFFICE LOBBY
GREEN POCKET
ENTRANCE CENTRAL GARDEN
OPEN STAIRCA
04/cyberjaya
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MPSepang TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Masterplan DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 55 acres Density (residential): 20 units/acre Plot Ratio (commercial): 1 : 4 Design Component: Service apartment, town house, villa house, terrace house, surau, clubhouse STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. Competition
16 CANALIS
CROSS
16 CANALIS
CROSS S PROPOSED MA
16 CANALIS
MASTERP PROPOSED MASTERPLAN COM
DEVELOPMENT CO
16 CANALIS
SECTION A-A
SECTION C-C ASTERPLAN
PLAN LAYOUT MPONENTS
OMPONENTS
16 CANALIS
VIEW TOWARDS CLUBHOUSE AND CENTRAL LAKE
16 CANALIS
CENTRAL LAKE AND CLUBHOUSE
AERIAL VIEW OF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
05/selayang
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MPSelayang TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Masterplan DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 211.55 acres Density (residential): 30 units/acre Plot Ratio (commercial): 1 : 4 Design Component: Service apartment, semi-D, town house, retail, sport center, surau, clubhouse STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. Competition
A
A
B B
SURROUNDING SECONDARY LAKE
MASTERPLAN LAYOUT
MASTERPLAN LAYOUT
MAIN LAKE, CLUBHOUSE AND SERVICE APARTMENTS
SECTION A-A
SECTION B-B
VIEW OF SECONDARY LAKE AND LANDED HOUSING
06/kepong
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. DBKL TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Residential DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 7.03 acres Density: 100 units/acre Design Component: Apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. To prepare a preliminary proposal
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
TYPICAL PLAN
TYPICAL TOWER PLAN
OVERALL PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPTUAL SECTION
07/menjalara
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MBPJ TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 9.92 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 7 Design Component: Retail, service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................ Schematic design RESPONSIBILITY...................................................................................................... To compare from previous proposal that is based on residential typology with density of 100 units/acre
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
TYPICAL TOWER PLAN
FACILITIE
PLAN PLAN ESPODIUM FLOOR
OVERALL PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPTUAL SECTION
08/kk
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MPKK TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 0.18 acres Maximum Height: 25 storeys Design Component: Service apartment / hotel, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................ Schematic design RESPONSIBILITY...................................................................................................... To study the difference in design configuration as effect of different requirement between hotel and apartment
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
TYP
FACILITIES FLOOR PLAN
TYPICAL TO
CONCEPTUAL SECTION BASED ON APARTMENT REQUIREMENT
PICAL TOWER PLAN - VOID
OWER PLAN - LANDSCAPE
OVERALL PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPTUAL SECTION BASED ON APARTMENT REQUIREMENT
09/damansara west 2
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MBSA TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 2.96 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 4 Design Component: Service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Design development OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. To prepare a preliminary proposal
BUILDING MASSING
BUILDING MASSING
3D MASSING - DROP
P OFF AND MAIN LOBBY AREA
3D MASSING - DROP OFF AND MAIN LOBBY AREA
10/kk
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. MPKK TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Landed housing DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 17.6 acres Design Component: Service apartment, villa, surau, clubhouse STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. To prepare a preliminary proposal
SITE PLAN
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT
OVERALL PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPTUAL SECTION
CONCEPTUAL SECTION
11/wangsa
AUTHORITY................................................................................................................. DBKL TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT INFO............................................................................................ Location: Wangsa Maju, Selangor Client: Beverly Group
DEVELOPMENT NAME......................................................................................... Lexa Residensi CLIENT......................................................................................................................... Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 2.12 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 4 Design Component: Retail, service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. CCC and Handover
DEVELOPMENT NAME......................................................................................... Fera Residensi TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial DEVELOPMENT DATA........................................................................................... Land Size: 2.35 acres Plot Ratio: 1 : 4 Design Component: Retail, service apartment, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Construction
12/perspective works
ASSIGNMENT,........................................................................................................... Facade design TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Residential, commercial, mix development, facilities STAGE............................................................................................................................. Schematic design, design development, competition
LOCATION............................................................................................ Seremban
LOCATION................................... Melaka
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Mix development
TYPOLOGY.................................. Residential
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ High end
PROJECT RANGE....................... Low cost
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
STAGE............................................ Design development
..........................................................
LOCATION............................................................................................ Bukit Subang
..........................................................
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Residential
..........................................................
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Low cost
...........................................................
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
LOCATION................................... Kota Kinabalu
TYPOLOGY.................................. Mix development
PROJECT RANGE....................... High end
STAGE............................................ Schematic design
...................................................................................LOCATION Melaka ..................................................................................TYPOLOGY Mix development .......................................................................PROJECT RANGE Mid range ...................................................................................LOCATION Damansara West ..................................................................................TYPOLOGY Commercial .......................................................................PROJECT RANGE Mid range
..........................................................
..........................................................
..........................................................
...........................................................
LOCATION................................................................................... Kota Kinabalu TYPOLOGY................................................................................... Commercial PROJECT RANGE....................................................................... High end LOCATION................................................................................... Kota Kinabalu TYPOLOGY................................................................................... Mix development PROJECT RANGE....................................................................... High end
LOCATION............................................................................................ Cyberjaya
LOCATION................................... Damansara West
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Clubhouse
TYPOLOGY.................................. Sales gallery
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Mid range
PROJECT RANGE....................... Mid range
STAGE...................................................................................................... Competition
STAGE............................................ Design development
..........................................................
LOCATION............................................................................................ Semenyih
..........................................................
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Sales gallery
..........................................................
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Mid range
...........................................................
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
LOCATION............................................................................................ Semenyih
LOCATION................................... Indah Height
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Guardhouse / Entrance statement
TYPOLOGY.................................. Guardhouse / Entrance stateme
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Mid range
PROJECT RANGE....................... Mid range
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
STAGE............................................ Design development
..........................................................
LOCATION............................................................................................ Damansara West
.......................................................... ent
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Guardhouse / Entrance statement
..........................................................
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Mid range
...........................................................
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
LOCATION............................................................................................ Indah Height
LOCATION................................... Cyberjaya
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Landed residential (Semi D and terrace)
TYPOLOGY.................................. Landed residential (terrace and
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ High end
PROJECT RANGE....................... Mid range
STAGE...................................................................................................... Design development
STAGE............................................ Competition
..........................................................
LOCATION............................................................................................ Cyberjaya
.......................................................... d townhouse)
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................... Shop lot
..........................................................
PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ Mid range
...........................................................
STAGE...................................................................................................... Competition
13/illustration works
ASSIGNMENT,........................................................................................................... Diagram TYPOLOGY.................................................................................................................. Commercial, urban development OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................. Competition, freelance
PROJECT AREA COMPONENTS
1 3 2
4
6 5 8
LAND USE
1
Malaysia Smelting Corporation Berhad
Transportation
2
Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn Bhd
Institutional
3
Industrial
4
Shophouses Pangkalan Sultan Abdul Halim Ferry Terminal
5
Malayan Railways Limited Station
6
Butterworth Railway Station Car Park
7
Butterworth Wharves
8
Vacant Building
9
Kuala Perai Primary School
Train Line
10
Warehouses
BORR Highway
11
Palmco Oil Mill Sdn Bhd
Squatters Open Space Penang Sentral Site Boundary
Penang Sentral
7
Site Boundary
9 10
11
OPPORTUNITIES
CONSTRAINTS
Potential High Density Residential
Inefficient Landuse
Potential High Density Commercial
Underdeveloped Land
Potential Green Space
Squatters
Adaptive reuse (eg: Media & Art Facility)
BORR Highway
Tourism Precint
Poor Visual and Pedestrian Connection
Pedestrian / Cycle Friendly Road
Underutilised Riverfront
Pedestrian / Cycle Friendly Trail
Site Boundary
Potential continuous waterfront Penang Sentral Site Boundary
12 2
3 1
4 5
6
2
PROJECT AREA COMPONENTS
LAND USE
1
Swettenham Pier Cruise Terminal
Transportation
2
Godowns
Institution and Public Facilities
3
Penang Port Authority’s Building
Commercial
4
Malay Chamber of Commerce
Open Space
5
Department of Religious Affairs
Site Boundary
6
Open Car Park
7
Church Street Pier
8
Hainan Restaurant
9
Pangkalan Raja Tun Uda Ferry Terminal
10
Rapid Bus Terminal
11
Royal Malaysian Customs Department
12
Penang Yacht Club Site Boundary
8
7
10 9 11
MAIN VISTA
OPPORTUNITIES
Low Priority Sea View Vista
Potential for new development and commercial activities Possibility of introducing a smart system for transportation through a pick-up point Cultural activities and family-focused leisure experiences
Site Boundary
Adaptive reuse of old buildings
High Priority Sea View Vista Moderate Priority Sea View Vista
Potential continues waterfront promenade Buildings to be retained Cruise terminal Underutilised open spaces Site Boundary
CIRCULATION Two-way Primary Vehicular Traffic Bus Stop
LOCATION......................................................................................... Butterworth and Georgetown, Penang
Penang Sentral Site Boundary Train Line BORR Highway
TYPOLOGY........................................................................................ Urban development DEVELOPMENT DATA.................................................................. Public spaces OBJECTIVE........................................................................................ Freelance
CIRCULATION Two-way Primary Vehicular Traffic Off-street Parking On-street Parking Bicycle Lane Motorcycle Parking Bus Stop Motorcycle Parking
CONSTRAINT Height control for future development due to heritage value Insufficient space for tourists buses circulation Existing godowns and warehouse in poor condition Blocks sea view and access to the waterfront Traffic congestion Future intervention is subjected to the 200m buffer from the Fort Limited parking available, mainly on-site Site Boundary
- 60% of plinth
- MBPJ plot ratio1:4 - allowable GFA : 43, 108 sq m
- site area : 10, 777 sq m / 2.66 acres
office suites
office HQ
- division based on different usage of building - defining building location as response to rock existence
- adjustment of building height based on building usage requirement
- division based on different usage of building - intrduction of central garden as focal point
- refining form of building
- healthy lifestyle overflow from central garden towards towers through inviting lobby space - different garden as green pockets of building
LOCATION......................................................................................... Damansara Perdana TYPOLOGY........................................................................................ Commercial PROJECT RANGE................................................................................ High end OBJECTIVE........................................................................................ Competition
- elongated form to maximize view - continuity of green urban space from neighbouring parks
- orientation of building to capture best view - lobby at ground level overlooking highway