Subject Matters II

Page 57

Rogers Partnership, and Arup revisited the issue in the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's 2001 Transbay Terminal Improvement Plan. Its focal point was a concept design for an intermodal (bus/train) replacement terminal on the current site of the 1930s Transbay Terminal building. Rethinking Transbay's Future, 2002–2003 In October 2003, a team led by SOM San Francisco issued the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area Design for Development, a detailed plan for the 39.2-acre set of publicly owned parcels. The plan reflects the active involvement of the Transbay Joint Powers Authority, including the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, the San Francisco Planning Department, and the Mayor's Office of Economic Development. SMWM's 20/20 Plan had designated the Project Area as a transit hub and a direct extension of the Financial District, but by now San Francisco faced dramatically different financial conditions, including a more-than-20-percent vacancy rate for Class A office space. A market analysis of the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area by Sedway Group identified the potential for 3,300 new housing units there by 2025. Office space was another likely future use, but six new office buildings—1.5 million square feet—were already slated for development in the area. New hotel development was in a similar situation. New retail space was also a likely use, but only in conjunction with new housing and office space, which it would primarily serve. A high-density area with distinct neighborhoods SOM's plan posits a Transbay Redevelopment Project Area that mixes widely spaced residential towers with low- and midrise housing, open space elements and, along its western edge, infill development where it overlaps two conservation districts that preserve existing historic structures. From a skyline perspective, the intent is to preserve views to the north and avoid a wall of closely spaced towers. New housing at Transbay will follow the precedent of Vancouver's tall and slender residential towers, a model also cited in the San Francisco Planning Department's Rincon Hill Plan. SOM's plan borrows another idea from Russian Hill and other San Francisco residential neighborhoods—a pedestrian-scale street

44


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Living in a material world

5min
pages 95-99

The bicycle shed conundrum

3min
pages 88-91

Fifty shades of dismay

4min
pages 92-94

Design Book Review

6min
pages 84-87

Is architectural licensing necessary? (2020

6min
pages 79-83

Two lectures: Lars Lerup and Rodolfo Machado

3min
pages 77-78

Some notes on value propositions (2019

11min
pages 69-76

Design firms need a both/and ethos (2021

4min
pages 63-66

Aphorisms for architects (2020

2min
pages 67-68

Art Gensler's treatise of the firm (2021

5min
pages 60-62

Beverly Willis in the 1980s and 1990s (2021

3min
pages 57-59

In appreciation of Sally Byrne Woodbridge (2020

3min
pages 54-56

Another line of practice (2012

4min
pages 48-50

The architecture critic as activist (2005

5min
pages 51-53

The classical imagination (2017

7min
pages 44-47

My postmodernists (2012

4min
pages 40-43

Great Man theory (2016

4min
pages 36-39

The pursuit of the ordinary (1983

12min
pages 14-20

Joseph Esherick's houses (2008

4min
pages 23-26

Preface to Dinners with Chuck(2021

3min
pages 21-22

The rogue element (2016

2min
pages 31-32

Work as if immortal (2017

4min
pages 33-35

The Bay Region reconsidered (2006

6min
pages 27-30
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.