Jack Huynh Portfolio 2017
This portfolio contains a series of projects showcasing creative and technical skills, in addition to client interaction experience.
Jack Huynh Bachelors of Engineering and Bachelors of Architectural Design E: jack.huynh.0@hotmail.com L: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackhuynh0/
Portfolio Contents 1. Toyko PopLab Competition Entry
Pg 1
2. Studio Studio - Yvonne Meng
Pg 3
3. Tarmac Hotel - Anna Nervenga + Toby Reed
Pg 5
4. Denver Central Library Intervention
Pg 7
5. Mount Martha Planning Proposal
Pg 9
6. Artplay Studio - Anna Tweeddale
Pg 10
7. Building Structures and Technology Competition
Pg 11
8. Research - Future of Car Ownership In Apartments
Pg 13
Toyko PopLab Competition Entry
Normal Setup
文化
Normal Setup Learning Program
Forum Setup Circulation Diagram
/‘bunka’/language: Japanese/ noun. culture
Normal Setup The group competition concept of the Tokyo Pop Culture Lab metaphorically expresses the notion of learning and research as a process of cracking open existing ideas to understand its internal Normal Setup workings. The building as an existing entity is split into two volumes, creating a void in between as a space to be filled by the developments of new ideas and trends. This void is supported by the supergraphic structure of “文化”, a homage to Japanese Kanji for culture. The geometry of the floors consist of an undulating surface of undefined boundaries to encourage interaction between programs whilst maintaining separation. 1
Forum Setup
Forum Setup
Forum Setup Forum Program Vantage Points Vantage
Vantage Points Vantage Points
Points
Ground Plan Not To Scale (NTS)
Firs t Floor Plan NTS
Second Floor Plan NTS
N
P
PO LTU
CU RE
2
Studio Studio - Yvonne Meng Site Map NTS
N
Live/ Work Creative Space
The studio focuses on the considerate design of the tower and its urban plan. The tower focus on resolving the issue of accommodation for displaced artists, through providing a long-term affordable studio within the current viable developer models. On the human level, this project looked at both the redevelopment of the Boyd Community centre, with the ambition to create a safe and engaging community space amongst the cold concrete jungle. To unify the tower to its site, the tower also acts as an expansion of the existing community hub, with a public library on the top floor, green public terraces, shared amenities and meeting rooms for offices and community events. 3
Pathways and Activity Centre Diagram
Urban Plan NTS 200
Bals ton Street
30
0
150
Kavanagh Street
City Road
250
1:500 Model
GO!
N
50
Prince
ss Hig
hway /
Kings
Way
100
Tower Program Diagram Community Library & Roof Garden
Typical Apartment Plan NTS
Typical Creative Space Plan NTS
1, 2, 3 Bedroom Apartments
Work / Live Spaces
Creative Spaces
Car Park / Dirty Space Ground Plan - Bike Storage - Cafe / Pop Up Stores
Community Facilities - Conference Rooms - Stores / Gym - Small theatre - Outdoor terraces
- Open Gallery
4
Tarmac Hotel - Anna Nervenga + Toby Reed
‘Tarmac’ is a form focused studio which develops a hotel and conference centre across Terminal 4 at Melbourne Airport. The design reuses the key element of the airport, the runway, to create new experiences and public spaces. Two runways intersect, curves upwards, allowing patrons to climb on for a surreal experience. The main runway lights up with LEDs at night, displaying flight information and graphics. The facade is created using parametric design to subtly quote the runways arrows. The hotel rooms recycle the shape and visual language of the design. NTS Map
Form Diagram
N
Runway bending
Tower block split
5
Runway supported by split
Reinterpret & simplify flight
Apply curve to section
blocks
data shape
shape
Lobby Render
Hotel Room Render
Model 1:200
Parametric Facade Diagram
Short Section NTS
+
=
+
=
Public Area/ Shops/ Cafe Reception
Program Diagram Hotel Rooms
Hotel Amenities
Conference Rooms
Maintenance/ Carpark
Long Section NTS
6
Denver Central Library Intervention North Facade Render
The exercise is a combination of contemporary history and communication design, with the focus on utilizing Grasshopper and Rhino 3D to practice parametric design methodology. The exercise aims to create an intervention at the Denver Central Library. The intervention is then represented through renders and a 3d printed model.
7
1) Building Facade Model
2) Base surface and attractor points + curve
3D Printed Model
3) Vertical extrusion lines
4) Point attractor extrusions
5) Curve attractor extrusion
8
Mount Martha Planning Proposal Esplanade Render
Contracted by private residences at a Mount Martha beach house, the client requested the assistance in drafting and proposing a duplex town house to council. The client objective was to provide a their son’s young family to live next door, with views overlooking the bay and rooftop garden spaces for the clients pot plants. The project provides exposure to residential codes, and experience with client and council interaction. The planning scheme completed included urban research, landscape, plans, elevations, shadow diagrams and renders of the prosed design. 38 .5 36
.4
9
L
Site Plan NTS
4
40 201 .400 8.000 EUCALYPT
33
.1
Balco ny
.2
8
33
7 .2
4
33.1
33
33
.2
0 0C
GP GP
L 33
6 .1
.1
1 33
.1
0 33
GP GP 33
GP GP
.1
.1
33
6 .2
.5 36
8F
F
6 .7 38
of Bi tum en
OO
35
.9
0 35
1 .9
N.Hab
201 .200 3.000 DECIDUOUS 33
Two Storey Brick Dwelling No. 583
L
5R 5 .28 39.2
39
33
.1
.6 36
5
2F
L
O 55R .2
37
.1
F 38
8
.9
1
N.Hab 38
5 .8
37
Hab
.3
35
.9
1
37
36 6 .8 38
.2
5
5
39
1 .4 38
Hab
36
7 .3 39
.4
2 38
Hab
.3
5 .1
S
33
.9 32
1T .0
DP DP
.9 32
9 33
.1
1
.3
.4
.3
44 201 .400 6.000 ACACIA
5
37
8R 8 .3
OF O
36
.6
Concret e Rollove
K
Crossing Concrete 33 L 9I .2 IP 33 .322L 33
E
.3
4T
K
Crossing .3 33
Concre
33
.4
2C 2
L
te Rol
9T
K
lover Ker b
201 .300 6.000 EUCALYPT
33
.4
7T
K
r Kerb
6 .7 39
33.3
33
22L .5
IP
33
.3
6T
GP GP
Speed
K
41
.8
6
201 .250 6.000 SHEOAK
33
.5
55L
33
.6
33L
IP
GP GP
33
.6
3
.9 38
EP
33.4
33
.6
IP
IP
3
GP GP GP GP 2 .6
33
Hump
6
201 .350 9.000 EUCALYPT
H1.6
6
8
7T
1 .2
7
.9
.2
L 1I .2 IP 4 33 .24L 33
NS A VENU
IP 3L 3 L .3 0I 33 33.3
41
.9
4
Concrete
EP
Fence
35
35.2 36
.2
33
ELP
Paling
OO
6 OF .488RO
OO
0
201 .400 7.000 EUCALYPT
.2 33
201 .200 5.000 HAKEA
7R 7
0
33
L 5 .1 .89I 6 .1 33 31 33 GP GP
.6
33
33
9
33
N.Hab
F
6
K
0R 0
8
36
.8 41 7T .1
S HA N
K
K
33
K IP 9T L 6 .8 .84I .86L 32 32 32
9T .0
F
.9
3 .3
33.4
33
33.6
33
8
Single Storey Brick Dwelling No. 1A
.7 36
1
.9 8
.3
33
SIGN
K IP L 5L 5 .0 .02I 33 33
.3
9
11E
201 .300 8.000 EUCALYPT
7T
37
Carport
40
.0
OF
4 .36 35.6 35
.1
33
SIGN
43 33
SIGN
O 77R .9
Shed
S
.2
33
4 .3
6E 6 S
44
.1 L
5
F OO 11R
35
201 .200 4.000 EUCALYPT
4
33.5
6I
.9
.6
.7 47
K
33
.9
OF O
0
5
.1 3 3E
33
33
33
43
.7
9
.5 35
201 .500 12.000 EUCALYPT 201 .300 6.000 EUCALYPT
7T
L GP GP 1I IP GP GP .1 3 33 .144L .1 2 .1 33 33 33
32
88R .6
Door
5 .9 34
201 .200 4.000 CYPRESS
.0
33
IP
OF
.4
194° 18.1 48' 7
39
39
m
.9 K
.0
36
284° 22.9 48' 8
6
Fenc e H1
GP GP
8L 8
O 11R .2
33
2 .1 42
201 .200 5.000 PALM
Picket
IP L 5 2I 5L .0 .0 33 33
.9
F OO 88R
35
DWELLING TWO FFL 33.7m
38
32.9
0T
L 7C
32
.6
DWELLING ONE FFL 33.7m
.0 1
Edge
.8
.0
K
SIGN
33
32
39
OF
.4 33
1T .9
IP L 8 8L .9 .95I 32 32
L
O 66R .6
Marker Post
201 .400 6.000 ACACIA
.0 33
4C 4
OO
8E 8 S
15.2 201 4 ° 22 SV 3 .9 IP 32 L 2 1I .9 32 K 2T .9 32
22L .9 32 32.9
9
.0
OF O
'
35
33
11R
7
36
' 05
of Bi tum en
40
3° 33 5 4.0
.8
.3 38
6
36
201 .200 4.000 DECIDUOUS
32
.3
201 .250 5.000 MELALEUCA
23.9 4 104° 48
OO
SV
32
IP 8 L 8L .8 32 .86I 32
38
.2 0
1
TAP .10 33
SIGN
4 .4
34
.1
39
1
'
ESP LAN AD E
33
00R .7
36
7
Hab
.2 33
9
1R 1
F OO 22R .4
F
4 6 .3 36 37.3
Hab 201 .300 7.000 MELALEUCA
42
33
.0 33
.3
Single Storey Brick Dwelling No. 583
OF
35
TP
4
Edge
Foreshore Reserve
4
1
1
36
.1
.9
1St
Concrete Crossing .0 33
35
Floor
33
.4
3
Shadow Diagrams 9am-12pm-3pm
9F
Artplay - Anna Tweeddale Front View
View from inside
The first year studios at Monash was commissioned by Artplay to design and construct cardboard a temporary play ground structures. The design theme was relaxing and exploring, in groups of 20 the studio responded with two multifunctional pyramids. There are spaces that allow retreating, and exploring, while the facade can be broken up into tiles that combine to create a floor. The project provided opportunities for group work to problem solve structure, tectonics details and logistics, while communicating with Artplay to determine their requirements. Conceptual Sketches
Relaxing and Exploring Sketches
10
Building Structures and Technology Competition
The winning group competition poster for engineering course ‘Building Structures and Technology’ for a four level office building at Monash Clayton. The competition combined both structural logic as well as elements of design and representation. The internal structural design explored and proposed three different lateral and vertical structure support methods. The considered façade design reflected the proposed cross bracing structure, whilst creating a unique aesthetic identity for the building.
1- Solar Panels 2- Sun Shading Fins
3- Cross Bracing Frames 4- Mullions
2
7- Floor System
5
3
1
5- Double Glazed Windows 6- Operable window
6 4
7 6 6
6 7 1 0m
1m
2m
LEGEND 1- Concrete Slab 2- Cross Brace Frame 3- Horizontal Fin 4- Double Glazed Window 5- Vertical Fin 6- Summer Sun 7- Winter Sun 8- Column 9- Solar Panels/Drainage
11
Reflected Sound
3
2
Increased Circulation
5 8
4 Internal Temperature
9
External Temperature
Controlled Permeable Facade
Lateral Support Proposals
1. Primary beam lateral support and core force plan diagram
Vertical Support Proposals
1. Precast T cross section slabs axonometric diagram
concrete slab column capitals concrete column services channel
Deflection profile: Without column Capitals vs. With Column Capitals
2. Fixed perimeter and shear core diagram
2. Flat slabs supported by columns caps diagrams
3. Facade cross brace forces elevation diagram
3. Continuous one way slab with band beams forces diagram
12
Research - Future of Car Ownership in Apartments
Fig.1: Melbourne population increases Fig.2: Densification leads to new apartments that Fig.3: New trends cut ownership, in future to 7.7million1 by provisions, require more car parking leaving empty car spaces and unused
Background Melbourne’s growing population will require denser living conditions with high density apartments at communities and transport hubs1. Current car parking planning schemes require minimum of 1 to 2 car spaces per dwelling2, which utilize space and resources, and can cost from $49,000 to $53,000 per car space for developers3. Residential structures have a long design life, but is outpaced by advancements in technology leading to autonomous vehicles and changes in car ownership attitudes through car share. These reduce car parking demand, leaving developers having overspent on car parking due to current planning schemes. Hence, there is a need to analyse the current ownership level and understand future trajectories to reform the parking requirements for future developments and reduce expenditure on parking facilities. Objectives There are four objectives in this research project. 1) Determine current and future trends in car share economy and autonomous vehicles. 2) Consolidate implications of trends on the residential apartment car parking demand. 3) Conduct a case study of car ownership level in Box Hill (Whitehorse) municipality, which is classified as a growing high density activity center1. 4) Comparison of results from case study with current car park planning scheme requirements, which regulate the use the development of land.
Fig. 4: ‘Greensharecar’ Melbourne pick up locations5
13
The outcomes will explore the impacts of new innovative technology on car parking usage and demands. A case study will provide evidence and precedence for the relevance and justification of minimum car spaces by planning schemes imposed on developers for high density residential apartments
Fig.5: Partially-autonomous self driving and parking Volkswagen4
Methodology Objective 1 and 2: Literature review of research journals, articles and online publications on current and future car share economy and autonomous vehicles, and their impact on residential apartment car parks. Objectives 3 and 4: Obtain 2011 Census data at Statistical Area 1 (SA1) of Box Hill. Analyze and average vehicles per dwelling type for apartments. Compare results between SA1 areas and with current planning schemes.
Fig.6: Metropolitan and major activity centres planned for dense housing developments1
Results At the time of this folio publication, objectives 1 and 2 have been completed. Literature has shown that autonomous vehicles are expected to become mainstream in Australia within 15 years time, followed by decrease in ownership levels, with self parking vehicles reducing parking areas by up to 62%. Car share will continue to grow in Australia beyond 50,000 members, with one car share vehicle able to replace 9 privately own vehicles. 1 Plan Melbourne, 2017. ‘02 - Melbourne provides housing choice in locations close to jobs and services’ The Plan, viewed 19th March 2017, http://www.planmelbourne.vic.gov.au/highlights/housing-choice-and-affordability 2 Planning Schemes Online, 2017. ’52.06 Car Parking’, Victoria Planning Provisions, viewed 19th March 2017, http://planningschemes.dpcd.vic.gov.au/schemes/vpps/52_06.pdf 3 Rawlinsons, 2015. ‘Australian Construction Handbook’, Rawlinsons Publishing, pp.51 4 Stoklosa, A, 2015. ‘Volkswagen Technologies at 2015 CES: Inductive Charging, Self-Parking, and More’, Caranddriver, viewed 19th March 2017, http://blog. caranddriver.com/volkswagen-technologies-at-2015-ces-inductive-charging-self-parking-and-more/ 5 Greensharecar, 2017. ‘Cars & Locations’, viewed 19th March 2017, http://www.greensharecar.com.au/cars-and-locations/
14
Thank you
20