Student Portfolio / 2013 - 2018 by Jack Wong

JACK WONG select student projects

2013 - 2018

ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO

Architecture through Perception

Industrial Marsh

A Dialogue of Interwoven Systems

Rooftop Resuscitation

Glitch Space

16 - 19

20 - 27

28 - 55

56 - 63

64 - 69

2nd Semester

5th Semester

6th Semester

7th Semester

8th Semester

Summer - 2014

â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Kissing Sparrowsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

Summer - 2016

Straus Houses

10 - 15

4-9

Recognition + Education+ Skills 2016

Student of the Year Award | Dean & Board Recognition

2016

Masonry Design Competition | 3rd Place - Straus Houses

2014 - 2017 2015

2018

School wide recognition for best project Judged on project integrity and comprehensive design

Associated Brick Mason Contractors of Greater New York + Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 1

City Works Award | School Wide Featured Student

School wide annual compilation of top student projects [6 time recipient]

Bigger than a Breadbox | Competition Finalist

What is architecture to me? Architecture has always been an act of discovery for me. As a kid I didn’t know architecture could be a job, but ever since I first experienced the profession in 2011 by accident, I haven’t looked back once. The fusion of design and engineering, combined with the effect it can have on people, has always captured my imagination. For me, working individually or in teams to create habitable spaces that are safe, effective, and pleasing to the eye is my Architecture, is my profession, and is my zeal.

‘Kissing Sparrows’ Pavilion Design competition finalist [Installation featured at BSA]

City College of New York | Spitzer School of Architecture

Bachelors of Architecture, GPA 3.77 [Deans List + Graduation w/ Honors] MS Office + Excel MS Project Model Making Hand Drafting

Acrobat Photoshop Illustrator InDesign

Revit AutoCAD ArcGIS Lumion

718.801.7840 | jhwstuff19@gmail.com issuu.com/jackwongarch

EXISTING SITE

KEY (proposed) RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY UNDERGROUND PARKING NYC RECREATION CENTER

F.A.R. (max) 4.0

Lot Coverage (max) 70%

Base Height 60 ft

Building height 75 ft

Required Parking 50% of units

3.75

48%

60 ft

70 ft

63% of units

ASSOCIATED BRICK MASON CONTRACTORS OF GREATER NEW YORK + UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, LOCAL 1

STRAUS HOUSES masonry design competition 2016

In the context of New York City, countless spaces exist that are in need of repair and regulation. They currently do not create an environment that encourages social encounters, but instead disrupt and pull apart the urban setting. Many of these complexes were built in the 50â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and 60â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s as part of affordable housing development. Many were built in masonry. Furthermore, they are seldom contextual and thus separated the building complex from the rest of the city. The Straus Houses are no exception. At the core of the issue is the way its inhabitants are viewed and architecturally removed from the Kips Bay community. To counteract these forces, the new design introduced 3 core public programs to mix inhabitants with the surrounding neighborhood; a recreation center, a semi-sheltered basketball court, and a library. On-site parking was shifted below grade and shared public rooftop spaces were introduced to bridge the gap between the public program and private residences of the two towers. Additionally, the rooftops of the towers were updated to become usable private spaces for inhabitants. Lastly, brick work was replaced with glass and structure was exposed on the main facades to open the towers up to natural light. This brick was then repurposed to build the structure for the public programs on the first and second levels. This project was submitted to and won 3rd place in a student design competition sponsored by the Associated Brick Mason Contractors of Greater New York and the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local 1 New York.

Summer - 2016

R8B Straus Houses (proposed)

Straus Houses

R8B General Residence District

Summer - 2014

‘Kissing Sparrows’

‘Kissing Sparrows’ is an amalgamation of a unit and a system. Built out of laser cut deep textured rolled stainless steel, the ‘Sparrows’ come together to ‘Kiss’ and form into a wind resistant matrix. Each Sparrow starts out as a kite shaped piece of metal and is laser cut to specification. It is then hand bent and assembled by a 2-person team. Once formed, the Sparrows can interlock into an infinite variety of assemblies via the pre-laser cut adjustable tracks. Assembly can be done with minimal hardware and tools; nuts, bolts, washers, and socket wrenches. Additionally, the assembly is fully weather resistant with all hardware and metal made form high grade stainless steel. This project was submitted to and won the runner up prize to the Boston Society of Architect’s Bigger than a Breadbox, Smaller than a House design competition. +Farm collaborated with Rigidized Metals in Boston, MA for the textured metals and subsequent laser cutting. All photos shown are located onsite in Boston’s famed Silo-City.

Locality

Block 1617

How Does

-83,200 sq.ft -less <100 people

Rezoning

SCA

What factors do we deem most im

Verb 1. to reclassify (a property, neigh zone or being subject to differe

Rezoning = Gentrification

• Rezoning is a tool we can use develops is the issue.

-55 mil sq.ft -114,000 people

• By specifying specific rules for entire neighborhoods, or lay th

New York City

Gent

rifica

tion

Scale

East Harlem

-302.6 square miles -8.538 million people

One Carnegie Hill - Luxury Ap

Externality

Zoning isn’t permanent and change at any time. East Harle continue to be extorted for its lan or without a rezoning project. H shows, outright protest of develo has never won in the long

“You can’t solve Housing without addressing Income” -NYCHA Executive Vice President for Capital Projects

Deborah Goddard

Land Misuse

8th Semester

Architecture through Perception

With Mayor Bill de Blasio’s push for new affordable housing, the largely untouched and low density housing in East Harlem was bound for a major rezoning proposal. Fortunately the initial 30 block long proposal that was drafted was met with protest from local residents as it seriously neglected and displaced thousands of families in the area without an interim housing solution. Following this pushback the East Harlem Neighborhood Plan, a community-based vision and strategy for the future of East Harlem was initiated. This group was put together to address and propose solutions for some of the major issues with the plan. Unfortunately, their calls seemed to fall on deaf ears and a patronizing tone as their proposal was vastly ignored despite the dozens of community hearings that took place in 2017. A single word – gentrification – sat at the heart of these discussions. It is my belief that the issue at hand was not only the rezoning itself, but also the preconceived notions of what it entitled. The goal of this project was to understand the underlying perceptions and subsequently demonstrate an alternative method in order to address the ever growing concerns of the city’s affordable housing crisis. This project was awarded and featured in City Works, an annual school wide compilation of the top projects in architecture and related fields.

Architecture through Perception

Negative Perceptions of Re-Zoning

How do we eliminate preconceived notions of zoning?

Why is rezoning perceived as gentrification?

(

0DMRU =RQLQJ &ODVVLILFDWLRQV

5 &

5 & 0

5 $

+2/< 5 64 26$5<

5 %

(IIHFWLYH 'DWH V RI 5H]RQLQJ

) .(

11(

52%

(57

6SHFLDO 5HTXLUHPHQWV

'< %5,' *(

0$3 .(<

-Home Ownersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Loan Corporation residential security map, New York, 1938

&RS\ULJKWHG E\ WKH &LW\ RI 1HZ <RUN

5 &

)((7

3/*'

( 7+

127( :KHUH QR GLPHQVLRQV IRU ]RQLQJ GLVWULFW ERXQGDULHV DSSHDU RQ WKH ]RQLQJ PDSV VXFK GLPHQVLRQV DUH GHWHUPLQHG LQ $UWLFOH 9,, &KDSWHU /RFDWLRQ RI 'LVWULFW %RXQGDULHV RI WKH =RQLQJ 5HVROXWLRQ

127( =RQLQJ LQIRUPDWLRQ DV VKRZQ RQ WKLV PDS LV VXEMHFW WR FKDQJH )RU WKH PRVW XS WR GDWH ]RQLQJ LQIRUPDWLRQ IRU WKLV PDS YLVLW WKH =RQLQJ VHFWLRQ RI WKH 'HSDUWPHQW RI &LW\ 3ODQQLQJ ZHEVLWH ZZZ Q\F JRY SODQQLQJ RU FRQWDFW WKH =RQLQJ ,QIRUPDWLRQ 'HVN DW

-NYC Planning Commission Zoning Map 6B

k Pa r tra l Ce n

Ce n

tra l

Pa r

-culture voids, East Harlem

Existing Violations / Need of repair

Buildings Under 3.4 FAR

Residential Block

Commercial Street Level

Ex-clusive Development

NYCHA

Under-Utilized Land

Neighborhood Anchor -sites shown are actual blocks in East Harlem

Neighborhoods that undergo gentrification loose their prior occupants and important original culture

3) Acknowledge other forms of development â&#x2020;&#x2019; to determine what we can save

-1516 Park Ave, Rendering (proposed)

-One Carnegie Hill, Luxury Apartments

Reduce perception of eminent domain

NYCHA complexes only provide housing without other essential program a neighborhood needs

Unused / Vacant Lots

2) Emphasize analysis existing characteristics â&#x2020;&#x2019; to determine potential use

4) Abundant negligent development & land misuse

-$11.25 million empty lot, 1516 Park Ave

-ascending selection process

Historically non-comprehensive â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;solutionsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

-NYCHA housing, East Harlem

-NYC Planning Commission Zoning Map 6B

1961

352/

=21,1* 0$3

7+( 1(: <25. &,7< 3/$11,1* &200,66,21 5'

Parts make up the whole

%/9'

2017

$9( 3/

%52:1

$11 6 $9(

67 $1 1 6 3/

%522.

%58&

0 .1(5 5 $

3352 $&+

& ' ( 5 3/

521$/ 0&1$,

5 % ' $

% $

5 $

7$ $

5 $

$ /+

(

3$5.

( &255,'

7$ 5

( %5,'*

0$5*,1$/ 675((7 :+$5) 25 3/$&(

&/ 352/

:,//,6 $9

$9(

=21,1* 0$3

3 03 ,

,12 $9 &/ 352/ (

5 $ 5 $ 5

% 5

(

3$/$'

%/9'

;

-5

%5,'*

:,//,

.,1*

/ , 1 (

(

+(5

5 %

/87

%5,' *( $

.(1 1('<

57 )

$9(

$57,1

; 0$/& /(12 ;

'5 0

8/ 6

. ( $3352

52%(

$9(

2/0

32: (// 5 721

8( $9(1

67 3$

., 3$5

( %5,'*

% 8 / . + ( $ '

$'$0

&/$<

;

' + ( $

3 , ( 5

0$5*,1$/ 675((7 :+$5) 25 3/$&(

(

38/$6 :,//,6 $9

(

5 $

' (9$5

+$5/(0 5,9(5 '5,9(

5 $

(

%28/

8 6

$9(

State and city enforced land use laws from the past, over both publicly and privately owned property, have remained largely unchained for 50+ years

5 $

67 1,&+2/$6

Denying services, either directly or through selectively raising prices, to residents of certain areas based on the racial or ethnic composition of those areas

&OLFN EOXH RXWOLQH RQ PDS WR YLHZ GLDJUDP RI SURSRVHG ]RQLQJ FKDQJH

1) Communicate analysis blocks, not neighborhoods â&#x2020;&#x2019; to determine potential locations for development

2) Inherited organizational procedures

Let blocks determine use, rather then inherited parameters

1) Discriminatory origins - Redlining

Renovate

Repurpose vs

+ direct Preservation of Neighborhood + culturally faithful to occupants - no densification of land - no added value to city - lack of incentives for developers

Replace vs

+ densify without rezoning + new opportunities to integrate program - time intensive design - not always feasible depending on program / existing conditions

+ easy to acquire new money + quickly puts abandoned land to use - often neglectful of great existing neighborhood qualities - often driven by profits

Site 1 - Park ave & 111th St

Development Strategy

Utilize the rare condition of an open lot:

How can we Facilitate Growth without Uprooting a Local Community?

Maintain Street Edge Profile

Mixed Use + Affordable Housing

Deploy Community Anchors

Case Study → to apply the rules

• gross square footage: 92,000 • number of homes (approx.): 8 • existing program types: - community anchor ball field various community gardens - low density housing - street level commercial bodega + hair salon • immediate surroundings: - housing NYCHA median income low income LIRR tracks Potential capability of site: • large community anchor: - single/dual program facility school health center etc. • repurposed low density housing - neighborhood center provides maintenance of gardens • renovated community gardens - most used maintained on major ave • ‘implied’ space - new program works together as a block to generate an implied space [implied space = space with overlaid perception of ownership]

Permanent community anchor with wide reach

(3) distinct / unique sites

-East Harlem

Site 1

Existing value and areas for improvement:

Massively under-developed valuable open land

East Harlem / Spanish Harlem / El Barrio - 96th street to 140th st, east of Fifth Ave

Communicate new development rules → to limit the abrupt perception of change

Park Ave - 111th Street

Site 2

3rd Ave - 116th Street

Site 3

Madison Ave - 127th Street

Street edge scale and program are maintained

Facilitate better development

Snapshot of ‘on the ground’ sense of scale: Repuposed existing low density housing maintained to serve community in organic form Large community anchor situated at rear of site by LIRR tracks institutes community permanence through structured form 50’ feet tall Space between becomes embedded as apart of community Most active gardens renovated to preserve street edge and program

Site 2 - 3rd ave & 116th St

Centralize housing to center of block and densify commercial:

Setback housing far from street edge to unused center of block Development height cap on street edge matches existing profile

existing buildings set precedent for neighboring program

Major commercial crossroad with high foot and car traffic

• gross square footage: 96,000 • number of homes: 450 • existing program types: - low density housing brownstones R7 mid-rise apartment buildings - empty rear lots • immediate surroundings: - community anchors (3) large churches (3) large high schools performance theatre art gallery - housing low density

Entirely housing-centric block lacking density

3) Snapshot of ‘on the ground’ sense of scale:

Existing value and areas for improvement:

Potential capability of site: • higher density housing: - R9 zoning (approx. 175 ft max) towers setback from street edge street edge profile maintained activated rooftops level with brownstones • backyard funding requirement: - building rear requires public space prevents alienation of new from existing development • minimal ground level development: - cap ground level development minimizes new development footprint offsets the height of the housing provides activated rooftop at same level as brownstone entrances’

Increased housing density w/ better integration

2) • higher density housing: - R9 zoning (approx. 175 ft max) towers setback from street edge positioned in under-activated center of block street edge profile maintained activated rooftops level with existing • higher density commercial space - multi-level commercial allows ‘stacking’ on program public library above traditional retail • more flexible street scape - within profile of brownstones & tenements allows larger singular programs

Single story base level to adjacent brownstones

High traffic commercial street bursting at seams

• gross square footage: 84,000 • number of homes (approx.): 500 • existing program types: - commercialized street small local business’ larger chain brands food & bars shopping banks - majority low density housing over 75% under 3.4 FAR - high pedestrian & automobile traffic • immediate surroundings: - similar block composition along 116th St and up 3rd Ave

2) Potential capability of site: Denser housing / commercial ready for growth

Create more housing while improving quality of the existing: 1)

1) Existing value and areas for improvement:

Existing heights for base of new development

Site 3 - Madison ave & 126th St

Snapshot of ‘on the ground’ sense of scale: Multiple setbacks reduces ‘looming’ effect of housing Activated rooftops level with roof of neighboring brownstones Development height cap on street edge matches existing profile Entrance to housing kept proportional to brownstones 1 story ground level cap allows brownstone stoop to be level with activated roof

Sewage

Food Scrap

26 Ward WWTP

Grease

Raw Bio-Gas Sludge

Waste Water Treatment Plant

OWRC

SSD

Market Hall

Organic Waste Recovery Center

Solar Sludge Dryer

Clean+Compress

Non-Food Grade Fertilizer

Bio-Methane

Fertilizer

Agriculture Center

CHP

Combine Heat & Power (Onsite + Grid) Compressed Natural Gas

Aquatic Feed

Parkland

Eco-Shuttle CNG Powered Pilot

MTA

50% of Bus Fleet Potential

Aquaculture Center

7th Semester

Industrial Marsh

The 26th Ward Wastewater Treatment Plant (26 WWTP) is one of New York City’s premier facilities, earning the ISI Envision® Sustainable Infrastructure Silver Award and the ASCE Infrastructure ‘Game Changer’ Award in 2015 and 2016 respectively. Despite this 26 WWTP remains archaic in both sustainability and design when compared on an international scale, utilizing antiquated practices such as flaring gas, mixing of organic and non-organic waste, and landfill heavy dependency. Because of these oversights, the new design calls for an additional facility to be developed in tandem with the existing infrastructure. The new program introduced mediates the boundary between the infrastructure and public space encouraging interaction and transforming 26 WWTP into a city wide magnet for sustainability and culture. At its core lies the thought process of ‘shared infrastructure’ rather than the existing divided city agency’s approach. The Industrial Marsh ties together inputs such as wastewater and organic waste, and turns them into outputs such as compressed natural gas, food grade fertilizer, and locally harvested agriculture and aquaculture. Additionally, the plant generates 100% of its own heat and electricity and would have enough leftover CNG to power roughly 50% of the MTA’s bus fleet that park across the street every night. This project was guided with the aid of Hillary Brown, former design director and Assistant Commissioner at New York City’s Department of Design and Construction and founder of its Office of Sustainable Design in 1996. She was co-author and managing editor of both the City of New York High Performance Building and Infrastructure Guidelines, and co-author of the USGBC’s State and Local Green Building Toolkit. Brown serves on the Board of Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment under the National Research Council of the National Academies. She is a Fellow with the Post Carbon Institute and a Senior Policy Advisor at the Ecologic Institute, U.S.. She has served on the National and New York City Board of Directors of the U.S. Green Building Council. This project was awarded and featured in City Works, an annual school wide compilation of the top projects in architecture and related fields.

FACTORY TRANSVERSE BEND

CROSS RAFTER

CONTINUOUS BUTYL SEALANT WITH MARRIAGE BEAD TO HORIZONTAL PANEL JOINT

GLASS STOP

1 4"

CROSS BLOCK

WEATHER SEALANT

- 14 HEX HEAD FASTENERS WITH WASHER CONTINUOUS MENDING PLATE

SELF FLASHING SILL BASE

HORIZONTAL SUPPORT

VERTICAL SUPPORT RAFTER

REINFORCEMENT ANGLE JAMB

STANDARD INTERLOCK JOINT FINNED GASKET

HEAD HORIZONTAL

FACE OF PANEL

1 " 2

COVER

EXPANSION JOINT PHTF

1 4"

- 14 HEX HEAD FASTENERS WITH WASHER

MIDSPAN CLIP ALIGNMENT CLIP SILL HORIZONTAL

CONTINUOUS BUTYL SEALANT STARTER CLIPS HOLD 614"

STARTER TRACK

HOLD 2"

BED SEAL TO CONCRETE BASE TRIM HOLD 7"

AGGREGATE BED SLOT DRAIN RUNOFF COLLECTION TO OPEN RESERVOIR

KEY PROGRAM CORRIDOOR VERTICAL CIRCULATION COVERED EXTERIOR SPACES

VIEW FROM PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR

ION

R SPACES

VIEW FROM PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR CORRIDOR

2ND FLOOR CIRCULATION DIAGRAM

VIEW FROM PROPO

cal he to de for

uts uts ail

ams VIEW FROM NAC

A. Philip Randolph High School is located within the perimeter of The City College of New Yorkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s campus. The buildings roots can be traced back to the founding of the High School of Music and Art in 1936. In 1984 it formally changed hands to the now magnet school. For this project, the elevated parking lot located in the front for the school was to be utilized to create additional classrooms. This project was to be documented as a part of our comprehensive design requirement. To address this, we started with the notion of prefab construction. The design carries a modular structural system to the face of the building. This system is expressed through a modular metric of the grid on multiple scales, while naturalistic elements are woven into the site to provide for phenomenological and experiential continuity. These two systems, the articulated grid and the naturalistic curvilinear vector, clash to break from the bureaucratic monotony and provide for a healthy academic space for students. This project was awarded the Student of the Year Award to my partner Michail Pikos and I, a school wide recognition for the best project based on integrity and comprehensive design. This project was also awarded and featured in City Works, an annual school wide compilation of the top projects 05/16/2016 in architecture and related fields. D. BOSS

D. LEAD

ADS

MP/JW

Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

6th Semester

and on, the ough

A Dialogue of Interwoven Systems

n Systems:

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

PROGRAM IN ELEVATION

KEY CIRCULATION COVERED SEATING CLASSROOMS SCIENCE LABS FOOD SERVICE BATHROOMS JANITORS CLOSET TRIAL 1

TRIAL 2

1ST FLOOR PROGRAM

2ND FLOOR PROGRAM

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW TRIAL 3

05/16/2016

TRIAL 4

Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

PROGRAM IN AXONOMETRIC

DESIGN PROCESS

A-002 TRIAL 5

TRIAL 6

02 OF 25

02 OF XX

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

SITE PLAN - 1/32”

A-101

SITE PLAN

03 OF 25

SCALE: 1/32” = 1’ - 0” 03 OF XX

A-202 1

A-201 1

A-302 1

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

SITE PLAN - 1/16”

A-102 A-302 1

SITE PLAN

04 OF 25

SCALE: 1/16” = 1’ - 0” 04 OF XX

the bureaucratic monotony and provide for cademic space for students.

N POINTS: d Grid c Interjection tructure ght amics

ame

roject Overview esign Process ite Plan - 1/32” ite Plan - 1/16” t Floor Plan nd Floor Plan onnection Plan levation - West levation - North terior Elevations terior Elevations ection - North/South ection - East/West omponents General Assembly Model Composition oinery Detail Wall Detail acade Section lan Detail

21 22 23 24 25

A-508 A-509 A-510 A-601 A-602

Detail Callouts Detail Callouts Column Detail Axonometric Hvac Diagrams

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

A-001 A-002 A-101 A-102 A-103 A-104 A-105 A-201 A-202 A-203 A-304 A-401 A-402 A-501 A-502 A-503 A-504 A-505 A-506 A-507

Project Overview Design Process Site Plan - 1/32” Site Plan - 1/16” 1st Floor Plan 2nd Floor Plan Connection Plan Elevation - West Elevation - North Interior Elevations Interior Elevations Section - North/South Section - East/West Components General Assembly Model Composition Joinery Detail Wall Detail Facade Section Plan Detail

21 22 23 24 25

A-508 A-509 A-510 A-601 A-602

Detail Callouts Detail Callouts Column Detail Axonometric Hvac Diagrams

19 20

A-506 A-507

Facade Section Plan Detail

2ND FLOOR HALL VIEW FROM NAC

2ND FLOOR HALL

1ST FLOOR ENTRANCE HALL

1ST FLOOR INTERSECTION

A-507 1

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS

A-506 2

MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

1ST FLOOR PLAN

A-103

1ST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0”

05 OF 25

05 OF XX

A-204 2

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

2ND FLOOR PLAN

A-104

2ND FLOOR PLAN

06 OF 25

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0” 06 OF XX

TOP OF SCHOOL 95’ - 0”

ROOF 26’ - 0”

2ND FLOOR 13’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

1ST FLOOR 0’ - 0”

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

GRADE - 15’ - 0”

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

WEST ELEVATION

ELEVATION - WEST

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0”

A-201 08 OF 25

0 OF XX

TOP OF SCHOOL 95’ - 0”

ROOF 26’ - 0”

2ND FLOOR 13’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW

1ST FLOOR 0’ - 0”

MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

GRADE -15’ - 0”

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

NORTH ELEVATION

ELEVATION - NORTH

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0”

A-202 09 OF 25

09 OF XX

TOP OF SCHOOL 95’ - 0”

ROOF 26’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW

2ND FLOOR 13’ - 0”

MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

1ST FLOOR 0’ - 0”

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

MECHANICAL -7 - 0”

SECTION - NORTH/SOUTH

NORTH/SOUTH SECTION

A-301

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0” 12 OF 25

12 OF XX

TOP OF SCHOOL 95’ - 0”

ROOF 26’ - 0”

2ND FLOOR 13’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS

1ST FLOOR 0’ - 0”

ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 GRADE -15’ - 0”

Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

EAST/WEST SECTION

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0”

SECTION - EAST/WEST

A-302 13 OF 25

13 OF XX

TYP. LAB - SOUTH

TYP. LAB - WEST

SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

1*A-204 A-204 1

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

TYP. LAB - NORTH A-203

SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

TYP. LAB PLAN SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

10 OF 25

10 OF XX

A-204 1

TYP. CLASSROOM - EAST SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

TYP. CLASSROOM PLAN SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

TYP. LAB - EAST

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

A-204 11 OF 25

11 OF XX

(2) PIECES PER TYP. BAY

FLOORS TO BE GUIDED INTO FRAMING ALONG TRACKS INDIVIDUALLY; SEE XXX FOR ASSEMBLY DETAILS.

CONTRACTOR TO HOLD ATTACHMENT OF END PANELS UNTIL STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY CONFIRMED BY ENGINEER AS PER SPEC.

15' - 0"

16' - 0"

7' - 6" 16' - 0"

*FLOOR SHOWN WITHOUT FINISHES

3 PANEL FINISHES BY STOCORP. PANEL SIZE VARIES BY LOCATION. LAYOUT SHOWN ON A-404. SEE MANUFACTURER CUTSHEETS FOR DETAILS ON INSTALLATION. (2' x 4' TYP. INTERIOR, 4' x 4' TYP. EXTERIOR)

SECTION DETAIL SCALE: 1/4” = 1’ - 0”

INTUMESCENT PAINT; PROVIDE 2 HOUR FIRE RATING.

12' - 0"

2' - 0"

(2) FLOOR + (2) WALL (2) FLOORS + (1) WALL

(2) FLOORS

3 78" 4' - 0" 1' - 0"

1' - 0" (1) FLOOR + (1) WALL

(1) FLOOR

NO INTERFACE

BEAM VARIANTS

BEAM COMPOSED OF (4) 5 41" STEEL ANGLES AND (3) STEEL TABS (NOTE FULL LENGTH VERTICAL TAB) D. BOSS

SCALE: 1” = 1’ - 0”

D. LEAD ADS

CONTRACTOR TO HOLD ATTACHMENT OF END PANELS UNTIL STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY CONFIRMED BY ENGINEER AS PER SPEC.

BEAM INTERFACE DETAIL SPECIFIC TO INSTALLATION LOCATION. SEE A-505 FOR FULL DETAIL. INTERFACE TO BE SPOT CHECKED BY ENGINEER AS PER SPEC.

ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016

TATE SMOOTH FINISH CONCRETE TILE CONCRETE 2' x 2' TYP.

Project:

(2) FLOOR + (2) WALL (2) FLOORS + (1) WALL

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

(2) FLOORS

3 78"

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

1' - 0"

COMPONENTS

1' - 0" (1) FLOOR + (1) WALL

15''-0"

SECTION DETAIL SCALE: 1” = 1’ - 0”

(1) FLOOR

NO INTERFACE

COLUMN COMPOSED OF (4) 5 41" STEEL ANGLES AND (4) STEEL TABS

A-501

COLUMN VARIANTS SCALE: 1” = 1’ - 0”

14 OF 25

14 OF XX

STEP 1

STEP 5

STEP 9

STEP 2

STEP 6

STEP 10

STEP 3

STEP 7

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

A-502 STEP 4

STEP 8

PROPOSED ASSEMBLY IN STAGES

15 OF 25

SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ - 0” 15 OF XX

PROPRIETARY EXTERIOR 4' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE

PLYWOOD SHEATHING

WOOD FRAMING

INSULATION

VAPOR BARRIER

PLYWOOD SHEATHING

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP.

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

SUBFLOOR

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

FLOOR JOISTS

MODULE COMPOSITION

A-503

FOUNDATION WALL AND MECHANICAL LEVEL

MODULE COMPOSITION

16 OF 25

SCALE: 3/8” = 1’ - 0” 16 OF XX

RECEIVER TRACK PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC. TYP. BEAM WITH 3 INTERFACE FLANGES. SEE BEAM VARIANT DWG.

RECEIVER TRACK D. BOSS D. LEAD

MOUNTING HOLES TO FOLLOW SPACING SHOWN IN A-501.

ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016

SUBFLOORING TO FOLLOW SPEC

Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP.

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

JOINERY DETAIL

JOINT COMPOSITION SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

A-504 17 OF 25

17 OF XX

32' - 0"

ROOF 28' - 3"

3' - 3 21"

4' - 0"

12' - 0" TYP.

SEE ALL NOTES ON A-XXX FOR CURTAIN WALL INSTALLATION.

SECOND FLOOR 14' - 6"

12' - 6" TYP.

12' - 0" TYP.

FIRST FLOOR 1' - 6"

D. BOSS D. LEAD

GRADE 0' - 0"

ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

BASEMENT -4' - 6"

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

WALL DETAIL

FOUNDATION AND FOUNDATION WALL NOTES LOCATED ON A-XXX

6" CONCRETE SLAB C/W WELDED WIRE MESH. SEE A-XXX FOR MORE DETAILS.

A-505

HVAC/MEP TO BE RUN IN BASEMENT. SEE RESPECTIVE DWG'S FOR CORRECT LAYOUT.

SECTION DETAIL

18 OF 25

SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0” 18 OF XX

16' - 0" TYP.

15' - 6"

12' - 6"

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

8' - 0"

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

PLAN DETAIL KAWNEER GLASS DOORS. SEE SPEC AND SCHEDULE FOR DIMENSIONS.

JOINT OF BEAM EXPRESSED THOUGH FLOOR. SEE RESPECTIVE DETAIL ON A-XXX.

TATE EXTERIOR FINISH CONCRETE TILE 4' x 4' TYP.

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP.

STONE TO BE CUT BY APPROVED WATER JET SERVICE. SEE STONE SCHEDULE FOR PLACEMENT DETAILS.

PLAN DETAIL

A-507

SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0” 20 OF 25

20 OF XX

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

FACADE DETAIL

TYP. FACADE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

TYP. FACADE SECTION SCALE: 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

A-506 19 OF 25

19 OF XX

TREATED WOODEN 2x10 LUMBER LOUVERS. 1' - 0" TYP.

ROOFTOP AT 7° SLOPE. (TO CONFIRM WITH ENGINEER)

DOUBLE PANE GLASS CURTAIN WALL BY KAWNEER. SEE SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS.

EXTERIOR FACE OF BEAM TO BE FULLY EXPRESSED.

STEEL INTERFACE CONNECTIONS. SEE A-XXX FOR DETAILS.

1' - 0" TYP.

PROPRIETARY EXERIOR STOPANEL TRIM. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

DOUBLE PANE GLASS CURTAIN WALL BY KAWNEER. SEE SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS.

2' -10"

WHITE UV RESISTANT PAINTED SUN SHELF.

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

2' - 0" TYP.

HVAC SUPPLY VENT. SEE HVAC DWG'S FOR SPECIFIC RUN.

OPERABLE CLERESTORY BY KAWNEER. REFER TO SPEC TO INSTALLATION.

2' - 10" TYP. HOLD 3' - 0" TYP.

JOINT OF BEAM EXPRESSED THOUGH PANELS.

DOUBLE PANE FLOOR TO CEILING RUN GLASS CURTAIN WALL BY KAWNEER. SEE SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS.

HVAC SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES AND DIMENSIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ENGINEER. HVAC PANELIZED COVE. SEE ALL NOTES ON INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.

TYP. HALLWAY BEAM DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

TYP. CLASSROOM BEAM DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

COLUMN TO MEET AT COVE. SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN DETAIL. 1' - 6" TYP.

STONE TO BE CUT BY APPROVED WATER JET SERVICE. SEE STONE SCHEDULE FOR PLACEMENT DETAILS.

2' - 10" TYP.

TYP. CLASSROOM HVAC DETAIL

KAWNEER MULLION TO BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO STONE PLACEMENT. WOODEN SHELVING. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND FURNITURE SCHEDULE.

PROPRIETARY EXERIOR 4' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

WOODEN SHIM

WOODEN SUPPORT BLOCK

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

1' - 0" TYP.

OSB BOARD WITH VAPOR BARRIER AND WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE R-40 "QUIET" BATT INSULATION

D. BOSS D. LEAD

LOCKERS (PRE MOUNTED INTO WALL)

PROPRIETARY STOPANEL HIDDEN RECESSED JOINT. INSTALTION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

TATE EXTERIOR FINISH CONCRETE TILE 4' x 4' TYP.

EMBEDDED STEEL INTERFACE CONNECTION.

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP.

TATE EXTERIOR GRADE RUST-RESISTANT PANEL FRAMING

ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

10" TYP. 1' - 6" TYP. 1' - 0" TYP. STEEL INTERFACE CONNECTIONS. SEE A-XXX FOR DETAILS. SINGLE INTERFACE BEAM (BEAM TYPE TO FOLLOW STRUCTURAL DWG'S)

CURTAIN WALL AND ROCK INTERFACE SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

1' - 0" TYP.

2" x 6" WOODEN STUDS 12" O.C.

FILL TOP COURSE SOLID

DETAIL ALONG CENTER BEAM SPAN SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

DETAIL CALLOUTS

TOP CAP INTERFACE TO BE WELDED TO BEAM

OSB BOARD. MEP RUN FROM BASEMENT SEE MEP DWG'S FOR SPECIFIC RUN.

STEEL INTERFACE CONNECTIONS. SEE A-XXX FOR DETAILS.

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

A-508

FOUNDATION TO WALL AND FLOOR INTERFACE SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

21 OF 25

21 OF XX

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP. RECESSED LINEAR RUN FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH CYLINDRICAL ACRYLIC DIFFUSER. SEE LIGHTING DWG'S FOR DETAILS. WIPE BOARD BY OTHERS. SEE INTERIOR ELVEATIONS.

PROPRIETARY STOPANEL HIDDEN RECESSED JOINT. INSTALTION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

1' - 0" TYP.

3 7 16 "

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 2' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

TYP. LIGHITNG DETAIL

HVAC PANELIZED COVE. SEE ALL NOTES ON INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.

REBAR ANCHOR APPROVED BY STONE SMITHS AND ENGINEER.

SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

CAULKING (TYPE TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER) POLISHED CONCRETE BENCH. SEE STONEWORK SCHEDULE FOR PLACEMENT DETAILS.

BAMBOO (SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DWG'S)

PROVIDE 1 41" LIP FOR S.S. PLANTER OVER FLOOR SYSTEM HEIGHT.

PROPRIETARY INTERIOR 4' x 4' STOPANEL. WHITE SEMI-GLOSS POWDER COAT FINISH. INTALLATION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC.

1' - 6"

PROPRIETARY STOPANEL HIDDEN RECESSED JOINT. INSTALTION TO FOLLOW STOCORP SPEC. 1' - 6" STOPANEL TO WRAP AROUND CORNER SEAMLESSLY.

STEEL INTERFACE CONNECTIONS. SEE A-XXX FOR DETAILS.

SEE SPEC FOR GROUND MOUNTING FOR TATE EXTERIOR FRAMING SYSTEM.

TYP. PLANTING DETAIL

SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

JOINT OF BEAM EXPRESSED THOUGH FLOORING

1' - 0"

MEP RUN FROM BASEMENT. SEE MEP DWG'S FOR SPECIFIC RUN.

PROVIDE WEEP HOLES FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE.

JOINT OF BEAM EXPRESSED THOUGH FLOORING

2' - 6"

1' - 6"

GRAVEL (SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DWG'S)

LANDSCAPE CLOTH (SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DWG'S)

HVAC SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES AND DIMENSIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ENGINEER.

TYP. STONEWORK SEATING DETAIL

COLUMN ROTATES 41°, FLOOR AND CEILING CUTOUT TO MATCH ANGLE OF COLUMN. SEE STRUTURAL DWG'S FOR DETAILS.

KEEP UNIFORM 21" SPACING BETWEEN PANELS (TYP.)

LOCKERS (PRE MOUNTED INTO WALL)

SCALE: 1 1/2” = 1’ - 0”

WOODEN SHELVING. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND FURNITURE SCHEDULE.

JOINT OF BEAM EXPRESSED THOUGH FLOORING

CORNER CLASSROOM DETAIL SCALE: 3/4” = 1’ - 0”

*STONES TO BE CUT BY APPROVED WATER JET SERVICE. SEE STONE SCHEDULE FOR PLACEMENT DETAILS.

TATE INTERIOR SMOOTH POLISH FINISH CONCRETE TILE 2' x 4' TYP. D. BOSS

4' - 0" TYP.

D. LEAD

KAWNEER MULLION TO BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO STONE PLACEMENT.

2' - 0" TYP.

ADS

1' 0" TYP.

ADS MP/JW

8' - 0"

MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

1' 0"

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

CUSTOM STOCORP PANEL. KAWNEER AND STOCORP TECHNICIANS TO INSPECT AND APPROVE CONNECTION.

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

EXTERIOR RECESSED LED UPLIGHTING FOR COLUMN. SEE LIGHTING DWG'S FOR DETAILS.

GLASS DOORS TO BE APPROVED BY KAWNEER; SEE SPEC.

KEEP UNIFORM 21" SPACING BETWEEN PANELS (TYP.)

ROTATED COLUMN DETAIL SCALE: 3/4” = 1’ - 0”

DETAIL CALLOUTS

A-509

TATE EXTERIOR FINISH CONCRETE TILE 4' x 4' TYP.

INTERIOR - EXTERIOR STONEWORK

22 OF 25

SCALE: 3/4” = 1’ - 0” 22 OF XX

BOLTS TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER

WELDED GALV. ATTACHMENT INTERFACE (QUANTITY TO VARY DEPENDING ON BEAM / COLUMN VARIANT. SEE A-401 FOR LIST OF VARIANTS) INTERFACE WITH TYP. WALL FRAMING (SHOWN AS DASHED)

INTUMESCENT PAINT; PROVIDE 2 HR FIRE RATING.

TYP. ANGLE CLADDING. SEE STOCORP SPEC FOR INSTALLATION DETAIL.

FLUSH SANDED 21" WELDED STEEL PLATE (SEE A-401 FOR VARIANTS)

TYP. COLUMN PLANS

5 41" STEEL ANGLES (TYP.)

SCALE: 3” = 1’ -0”

1 8"

SCREWS LOCATED 11" O.C. ALONG PANEL (TYP.)

3" SCREW SPACING (TYP.)

REVEAL (TYP.)

TYP. J-BOX. FOR SPECIFIC LOCATIONS SEE ELECTRICAL DWG's

RECESSED DIMMABLE LED LINEAR FIXTURE WITH ACRYLIC DIFFUSER (SEE SPEC FOR INSTALLATION DETAIL)

4 43" 2'-0" PANEL SEGMENT (TYP.)

2 21"

1'-0"

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW

4 43"

MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

SUPPLY WATER LINE. CONTRACTOR TO INSURE SCREWS SIT FLUSH AGAINST STOPANEL.

COLUMN DETAIL

PROPRIETARY UNICO NARROW HVAC SUPPLY / RETURN DUCT TO BE RUN ALONG COLUMN. FROSTED ACRYLIC DIFFUSER BY MANUFACTURE

1 8"

REVEAL (TYP.)

TYP. COLUMN ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3” = 1’ -0”

A-510

UNIVERSAL COLUMN DETAIL

23 OF 25

SCALE: FULL 23 OF XX

D. BOSS D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

AXONOMETRIC

A-601

EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC

24 OF 25

NOT TO SCALE 24 OF XX

AXONOMETRIC

PROPOSED HVAC RUN NOT TO SCALE

KEY RETURN SUPPLY

D. BOSS 1ST FLOOR PLAN

2ND FLOOR PLAN

D. LEAD ADS ADS MP/JW MP/JW

05/16/2016 Project:

M540, MANHATTAN A. PHILIP RANDOLPH CAMPUS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION SECTION - N/S

SECTION - E/W

Address: 443 WEST 135 STREET MANHATTAN, NY 10031

HVAC DIAGRAM

A-602 25 OF 25

25 OF XX

5th Semester

Rooftop Resuscitation

Aaron Davis Hall (ADH) is a part of the City College of New York and the largest performing arts center in Manhattan north of Lincoln Center. It features 2 theaters that seat 630 and 267 people and a studio complex. The venue showcases cultural performances, including classical, jazz and Latin music, dance, theater, literary readings, film, performance art, and art exhibitions. ADH hosts an ambitious, year-round calendar of events, most of which are open to the public. The architecture houses an innovative two-theatre performing arts complex that houses public performances and exhibitions by students as well as professional artists, and serves as the cultural hub for Northern Manhattan and Harlem. ADH is the only cultural facility of its kind between Lincoln Center and Northern Manhattan and is used by groups like Carnegie Hall, Dance Theater of Harlem, Ballet Hispanico, the Harlem School of the Arts, and other community-based and cultural organizations. However, most City College students have no idea what the building is, despite walking past it every day to and from the dorms and the subway. In its current state, its potential is untapped as a building. To address this, the design analyzed the multiple rooftops. These roofs are not used and were the inspiration to transform the building into a tectonic park with spaces to be used both publicly for the college as well as privately by the performing arts students. At its core, the design utilizes the white noise and â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;curtain-likeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; effect of water to redesign the entrance and roofs. The design accommodates a new flexible gallery space with semitransparent waterfall curtains to allow light, but not sound to penetrate the space. The rooftops consist of a park which spans across the building and connects the students who pass by and encourages them to interact with the building. Lastly the upper most amphitheater showers across the other roofs and provides a private outdoor space for the performing arts school. This project was awarded and featured in City Works, an annual school wide compilation of the top projects in architecture and related fields.

2nd Semester

Glitch Space

This conceptual project was an exercise to understand the effect a human body can have on the space that surrounds it. It was an iterative process that began with the mapping of the human body performing an action involving a drastic motion. A network of implied force vectors was derived from the motion and applied to a space. The result was a â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;glitchâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; in the system; the movement of the body was defined as a series of points and vectors represented by wooden sticks and their intersections. The space was represented by white chipboard. Due to the disruption the bodyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s action caused on the space, the vector lines become the very elements that hold the space together and give it structural form. This project was awarded and featured in City Works, an annual school wide compilation of the top projects in architecture and related fields.

JACK WONG / SELECT STUDENT PROJECTS / 2013 - 2018