The Future of Naval Aviation

Page 1

AN ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TO THE WASHINGTON POST

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2011

EZ

H1

EE

InsIde

THE FUTURE OF

naval avIatIon

iS the LArge-deck AircrAft cArrier obSoLete?

Sen. Jim Webb: A need for ViSion And LeAderShip PAGE 2

PAGE 6

Adm. JonAthAn greenert: nAVY WiLL continUe to be forWArd And reAdY PAGE 2

AboUt thiS Section: this special supplement was prepared for the Advertising Custom Content department of The Washington Post by freelance journalist and editor Marcy Gessel in cooperation with the U.S. Navy and the 100th Anniversary of Naval Aviation Foundation. the production of this supplement did not involve the news or editorial departments of The Washington Post.

FISCAL CRISIS

Battle on to Secure the Future of Naval Aviation U.S. NAvY Photo bY MASS CoMMUNiCAtioN SPECiAliSt 3RD ClASS ANthoNY W. JohNSoN

of uncertainty, amid deep cuts in national defense expenditures. A sagging economy and drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan have military planners trying to balance the desire to downsize with the need to keep up with rapid technology advancements in communications, weapons and air systems.

Meantime, the increasing deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles and the automation of aircraft carrier landings may change the very nature of what it means to be a naval aviator. The Defense Department faces at least $450 billion in cuts over the next 10 years, and the amount could grow substantially depending on the final outcome of Congressional budget debates. Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert, Navy chief of naval operations, told the House Armed Services Committee on Nov. 2 that if acrossthe-board cuts were imposed on the services and programs, “We will be out of balance.” Greenert noted that the Navy has provided one-third of the close air support for the war in Afghanistan. The Navy’s aircraft carriers and their air-and-sea strike forces provide power projection across the world. In the coming decades, a few issues stand out as being keys in the progress of naval aviation: a) The Navy needs to determine how best to exploit the explosion in unmanned aerial vehicles and systems and adjust to the changes it will create in personnel, training and equipment needs; b) Similar rapid developments in technology for electronic warfare—both by the United States and its adversaries—will require investments in science and technology, while attention also needs to be paid to protecting the communications

systems needed to transfer data among units; c) Expansion in the use of rotary and vertical takeoff-and-landing aircraft continues and may affect the kinds of ships that will transport them.

“Right now, the future of naval aviation is mixed,” said Mackenzie Eaglen, research fellow for National Securities Studies at the Heritage Foundation. At the same time the Navy has halted production on some of its new fighter jet platforms, the Navy and Marine Corps’ “fighter gap”—a deficit between the services' fighter aircraft inventories and their operational requirements—is real and growing, she said. During a hearing in 2009, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) noted that the Navy could face a shortfall of “as many as 250 tactical fighters needed to outfit” 10 aircraft carrier air wings and 3 Marine Corps air wings in the next five years. “A growing deficit this substantial will severely limit the aircraft available to combatant commanders on short notice. The outcome can't help but inhibit mission capability and the ability to undertake global operations,” Eaglen said. The Navy faces different issues than some of the other services, noted Owen R. Coté Jr., associate director of the Security Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It takes

the most plausible, high-end scenarios for the U.S. military are primarily naval and air engagements … in my opinion, any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should 'have his head examined,' as General MacArthur so delicately put it. –As delivered by then-Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates at West Point, NY, February 25, 2011

longer to build a ship than a sensor, so when budgets are tight one tends to protect ship building” he said. “But there is a lot of really important stuff with sensors and networks that’s happening. The danger is that it would get left on the shelf.” Eaglen noted that as part of the ongoing cuts, politicians halted production of the Air Force’s F-22 Raptor, meaning that DOD is building no fifth-generation alternative should the joint NavyMarine Corps-Air Force F-35 Joint Strike Fighter falter. The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II faces its own threats to funding, particularly because of skyrocketing costs and production delays. Traditionally, the Navy and other armed services have added new equipment onto old platforms, said retired Vice Admiral Robert F. Dunn, former deputy chief of naval operations for air warfare and current president of the Association for Naval Aviation. Just as the Navy began its aircraft carrier fleet by converting colliers and then cruisers, building onto the proven systems operating today is the least expensive course to take, he said. Thomas Hone, a retired Naval War College professor who has worked as a naval planner, agreed that starting with a reliable platform that can be updated provides the needed versatility. The Boeing B-52 Stratofortress has been in use since 1955 and the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit designed in the 1980s with the Cold War in mind, has shown real usefulness after being updated, he said. The F-35 has run into problems because too many requirements have been added onto the basic platform, Hone suggested. The single-engine stealth fighter will handle ground attack, reconnaissance and air defense missions and is being designed in a conventional take-off and landing variant, a vertical take-off and landing variant for the U.S. Marine Corps, and an aircraft carrier-based model. The Marines are counting on the F35-B variant to replace its aging AV-8B Harriers and Boeing F/A-18 Hornets. The F35-B is the most complex of the three variants and is set to fly from amphibious

An F/A-18E Super Hornet launches from the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) over the Pacific Ocean on Oct. 31, 2011. U.S. NAvY Photo bY SENioR ChiEF MASS CoMMUNiCAtioN SPECiAliSt JoE KANE

T

he Navy enters its second century of naval aviation at a time

A sailor crosses the flight deck in front of two Marine Corps CH-53 Sea Stallion helicopters as the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHd 6) moves through heavy fog south of San Francisco.

ships. Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates placed the F-35 on a two-year probation in January because of cost and performance problems, but Lockheed Martin reports a successful year of testing, including a safe vertical landing onto the USS Wasp dock on Oct. 3. The Marine Commandant, General James F. Amos, told

the House Armed Services Committee on Nov. 2 that cuts beyond those already programmed would decrease forward presence and restrict the service’s ability to reset and refresh equipment pushed to its limits over the last decade of war. But the most severe damage would be to tilt-rotor and VTOL technology, he said, because the

United States is the only place in the world building such aircraft, in the F-35B and MV-22 tilt-rotor. “If those lines were closed, that becomes terminal,” he said. “That would be irreversible. You will not be able to gain that back.” Coté, Hone and Eaglen all asserted that short-term budget fiScAL criSiS CONtiNUEd ON 2

UNMANNED TECHNOLOGY IN ITS INFANCY

This Century’s Naval Aviation Pioneers Flying Unmanned Aircraft

O

n Oct. 9, 1903, the New York Times predicted, “The flying machine which might really fly might be evolved by the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanicians in from one to 10 million years.” Yet that very same day, two brothers who owned a bicycle shop in Ohio started assembling the very first airplane. And only six years from that date, Lt. George C. Sweet would climb into a plane built by those same brothers at College Park, Md., becoming the first U.S. Navy officer ever to take flight. One year after that, Eugene Ely flew off a wooden platform built on the bow of the USS Birmingham (CL 2) and the era of naval aviation was truly at hand, literally “one to 10 million years” earlier than the experts’ predictions.

We should keep this history in mind when trying to project where naval aviation is headed next, especially in the realm of “unmanned” or robotic systems. In the blink of an eye, a technology that once seemed as science fiction as a “flying machine” is now rapidly being adopted into the force. In the last decade, the number of unmanned aerial

systems in the overall U.S. military inventory has gone from a mere handful to over 7,000 and growing. And, just like with those early aeroplanes, the naval side is an active part of this technological revolution. Today, the new unmanned systems entering into the fleet run the gamut of size, shape and form. For instance, the role of

broad area maritime surveillance is being taken over by the RQ-4 Global Hawk. With a wingspan of 116 feet and an operational weight of over 22,000 pounds, it dwarfs the early planes that Sweet and Ely flew. Staying in the air over 24 hours, while carrying 3,000 pounds of electro-optical, infrared and synthetic aperture radar sensors, at heights of over 65,000 feet, the system provides persistent maritime intelligence, ISR data collection and dissemination at a global level. While the RQ-4 operates from a land base, the Navy is also working to equip many of its ships at sea. On the surface fleet, these include smaller systems like the MQ-8 Fire Scout. Able to take off and land autonomously from any warship with a small deck, the little helicopter has deployed against drug runners in the Caribbean, pirates off Somalia, insurgents in Afghanistan, and recently helped targeting in the Libya operation. It packs thermal imagers, radar, high-powered video cameras and a laser designator that can find and

fix targets to be taken out either by the mother ship’s weapons or rockets to be carried on the drone itself. With a range of over 200 miles, the robotic chopper is an unmanned echo of those early

the prototype stage right now are the Northrop Grumman X-47, Lockheed Martin RQ-170, General Atomics Sea Avenger, and Boeing Phantom Ray. Without a cockpit, and in some cases, even no tail

despite its relentless advancement, there are no signs that technology will end the central role of humans in war and at sea any time soon. —P.W. Singer, author of Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century

floatplanes, taking the eyes of a surface ship’s captain further than ever before, including inland. The centerpiece of future plans for unmanned systems at sea may be the Navy’s unmanned, carrier-launched surveillance and strike (UCLASS) program. This type of robotic plane is specially designed to take on the ultimate of human pilot roles, the “Top Gun.” Some of the key contenders at

wings, such systems have been described as looking more like a set piece from the television program “Battlestar Galactica” than our traditional notions of a plane. But these same attributes give them capabilities well beyond even some of the latest manned strike fighters. Designed to be especially stealthy for the most dangerous roles, such as sneaking past enemy air defenses, the

prototypeshavelaunchedprecision guided missiles, been “passed off” between different remote human operators 900 miles away from each other and, in one war game, autonomously detected unexpected threats (missiles that “popped-up” seemingly out of nowhere), engaged and destroyed them and then did battle damage assessment on their own. They also promise to lighten the load on human operators. One human pilot remotely flew two UCASs at the same time. The current U.S. Naval Aviation Master Plan includes provisions for the UCLASS systems to be flying off of carrier decks by 2018. Whether they will be delegated to take on tasks on their own or paired with manned planes, for a package that is greater than the sum of its parts, is a crucial question of naval air combat doctrine moving forward. It is akin to the question early warplanes faced as to whether they were to be tethered to the existing surface UnmAnned technoLogY CONtiNUEd ON 12


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.