Urban Design: Studio Summary by Jake Senne

urban design studio summary jake senne december 2020

table of contents

unit no. 1: urban design intensive project 1. 1: l i te rat u r e r e v ie w

project 1. 2: se ri al vi s ion project 1. 3: gre at st e e t s

unit no. 2: envisioning an urban village plan project 2. 1: i n ve n t or y & a na lys is

project 2. 2: vi si o n p la n project 2. 3: c o n c e p t p la n

unit no. 3: d e sig n in g a n u r b a n v illa g e project 3. 1: sc h e ma t ic d e s ig n

project 3. 2: de si gn d e v e lop m e nt project 3. 3: f i n al des ig n

unit no.1 u r b a n design in ten siv e

project overview

pr o je c t 1 . 1 l i t e rat u r e r e v iew

We began this studio by exploring a number of interrelated topics to help us better understand the functions and design of urban spaces. In order to do so, we examined text from renowned urbanists like Jane Jacobs, Kevin Lynch, and Christopher Alexander. Additionally, we each selected two â&#x20AC;&#x153;information neighborhoodsâ&#x20AC;? to dive into even deeper. My choices, being Connectivity and Emerging Urbanist Ideas, allowed me to study concepts and movements such as Transit Oriented Design, road diets, activating alleyways, complete streets, traffic calming, streets as places, New, Lean, and Pop-Up Urbanism, and a myriad of others. The importance of beginning our Urban Design Studio with this type of introduction can not be overstated. It allowed us to establish a strong base from which to build upon throughout the semester. The ideas, concepts, and philosophies discovered here served as a guide for the ensuing projects. Personally, I am confident that the discoveries and knowledge I gathered through this literature review will not die with the end of this semester, but will be added to my toolbox and translate well into my future design endeavors.

My 5 Key Takeaways 1. Diversity is key – both in the land uses and the population 2. Pedestrian experience is vital to success – design for the human scale 3. Be willing to adapt, and design for versatility and flexibility 4. Decrease overall dependence on the automobile and promote alternative modes of transportation 5. Create a sense of identity and comfort

Components of a Great Urban Corridor • Mix of uses, activities, and people - As designers, we must place a heavy focus on DIVERSITY of all kinds - Creates interweaving of human patterns - Celebrate the different or foreign elements, strive for uniqueness, and applaud randomness • Sense of identity and security - Use of single and continuous quality - Placemaking - Homogeneity of spatial elements - Simplicity

• Focus on pedestrian experience - Design to the human scale: increases comfort and appeal + 5 minute walk from center to edge - Walkability is one of the highest priorities + Housing and shopping in close proximity + Accessible public spaces - Thoughtful safety elements + Decreased crossing distance + Reduced lane width + Vertical elements + Intersections

Issues With Today’s Urban Spaces • Vehicle-centric society - Led to cities dominated by vehicular traffic and congestion - Component of urban sprawl and strip development - Uninviting and unsafe streetscapes - Lack of pedestrian flow

• Severe lack of diversity (both uses and demographic) - Gentrification - Poor living environments - Placelessness and lack of identity - Duplication and mundaneness - Lack of visual interests

These are all driving forces behind a certain disdain for urban life. By addressing many of these key issues, designers can create an improved, more enjoyable urban experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists alike.

- Activation of underutilized or unused spaces + Activities along the sidewalk +Alleyways + Parklets + Increases diversity • Versatility - The ability of a street to function as a public space - Allow for spontaneity – Tactical/Pop- up Urbanism - A dynamic streetscape that can serve more than just the vehicles driving through

• Multi-modal transportation - Decreased dependence on the automobile - Encourages more sustainable practices + Bike lanes + Public transit + Trains + Reduced dependence on foreign oil - Safe access for all users of all ages

project 1.1 literature review

Connectivity in the Urban Village Streets and corridors play a vital role in our urban spaces. Acting much like the veins in our own bodies, streets are the arteries of a city, moving people and vehicles throughout the urban setting, linking various nodes and districts within the city. But, great streets serve more of a purpose than solely a circulation route. Streets should act as public spaces, where residents and visitors can interact with each other and the complex environment around them. Streets should encompass more than

just vehicular traffic. They should place an increased focus on the pedestrian experience and safety. They should aim to eliminate a total dependence on automobile by providing alternate means of transportation though elements such as bike lanes, public transit, light rails. In total, connectivity within the city should extend past the sole dependence on the automobile while placing an increased focus on the comfort and livability of the people that use these corridors.

Emerging Urbanist Ideas in the Urban Village The philosophies and teachings of contemporary urbanist movements mirror much of what was presented by previous activists like Jane Jacobs, Christopher Alexander, Allan Jacobs, Donald Appleyard, and many others. The Charter for New Urbanism clearly defines its principles as rooted in the overall improvement of urban life and experience. Much like the previous

activists, this initiative believes that neighborhoods and urban areas should be diverse in both uses and population. The homogeneity and mundaneness commonplace in todayâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s cities has left us with underperforming single-use districts. Another key component to the New Urbanist movement is the focus on pedestrian and transit

project 1.1 literature review

unit no.1 u r b a n design in ten siv e

project overview

pr o je c t 1 . 2 s e r ia l v isio n

Introduced by influential British architect and urban designer Gordon Cullen, the term â&#x20AC;&#x153;serial visionâ&#x20AC;? played a key role in our understanding of the experiential qualities of urban spaces. This approach, which is comprised of a series of hand-drawn sketches that lead the viewer along a path, is intended to encourage the designer to consider how the views and sight lines can build upon each other, thus effectively pulling the visitor through the urban space. This pulling effect created by the series of viewsheds aids in providing direction, navigation, placemaking, and sense of belonging. Examining an urban space through this lens allows the designer to see where a city is successful or deficient in creating an experience, and lets them identify opportunities to build upon the unique character of the existing urban fabric. As a young designer, this alternative approach to understanding urban form and spatial relationships within the urban environment was critical in my personal development. It allowed me to shift me perception and develop a better grip on the principle of urban design. This way of thinking was applied in projects in both Unit 2 and Unit 3.

A walk down Market Street â&#x20AC;˘ Indianapolis, IN

Narrows direct views towards the focal point. Plazas and open spaces along the walk add variety.

The view opens up on Monument Circle. The monument itself creates a focal point and landmark.

Again, the narrowing of building facades direct views towards another focal point.

The road terminates at the steps of the Statehouse, resulting in a closed vista.

project 1.2 serial vision

Manitou Avenue â&#x20AC;˘ Manitou Springs, CO

The combination of the curved road and topography limits views, creating a sense of mystery. Level changes create interest.

Another curve in the limits the view shed yet again. Mixed-use buildings and diversity of uses add to the urban village feeling.

Bumpouts and activity spaces along the sidewalk create social opportunities.

A fork in the main road way creates a terminus. The split also provokes further exploration of the village.

project 1.2 serial vision

unit no.1 u r b a n design in ten siv e

project overview

pr o je c t 1 . 3 gre a t st r e e t s

The final portion of our Urban Design Intensive called for us to explore Allan Jacobs’ work: Great Streets. This exploration allowed us to examine the characteristics and qualities that make are influential in creating some of the world’s most recognizable and finest streets. Furthermore, this project tasked us with selecting an urban corridor and inspecting it in the same process so that we could compare it to one of these “great streets.” To do so, I chose a portion of Market Street in downtown Indianapolis, given my personal appreciation of the experiential and aesthetic qualities of the corridor. For comparison, I studied a street by the name of Kungsportsavenyn, located in Goteborg, Sweeden, finding a number of similarities. More interesting were the areas where Market Street fell short. I see these as opportunities for improvement along the roadway. The exploration of these two streets, as well as a number of others within the text, allowed me to develop a better understanding of the qualities and characteristics that are commonly present along a well-designed, pedestrianfocused streetscape, as well as identifying aspects that could be improved.

Market Street | Indianapolis, Indiana • Length of street/corridor: 2,580 ft. • Right of way width: About 90 ft. • Street width: About 50 ft. • Sidewalk width: About 20 ft. each side • Average building height: 8 - 10 stories • Building uses: Residential, restaurants, lodging, service-based, public, private offices, parking • Vegetation: - Street tree density varies - Spaced about 30 ft O.C. when present - Small individual flower containers • Street materiality: Red brick/concrete bands • Sidewalk materiality: Red brick/concrete bands • Additional structures/amenities: - The City Market - Sparse Outdoor seating at restaurants • Additional spaces: - Plazas - Monument Circle • Modes of transportation: - Car - Walking - Scooter - No bike lanes, buses, street cars, etc. • Number of lanes of traffic: 2 • On-street parking: Each side • Crosswalk conditions: - Lights at intersections - 1 mid-block crosswalk - Clearly identifiable • Pedestrian feel: - Brick sidewalk gives off a nice, unique feeling - Buildings are very tall in most cases - No bike lanes forces cyclists onto sidewalk • Other appeals: - Landmark features - Dead-ends into Statehouse

Kungsportsavenyn | Goteborg, Sweeden • Length of street/corridor: 2,340 ft. • Right of way width: About 140 ft. • Street width: About 50 ft. • Sidewalk width: Varies, 35 - 40 ft. • Average building height: 6 stories max. • Building uses: Residential overhead, restaurants, public, commercial, retail • Vegetation: - Even distribution of street trees - Spaced at 30 - 35 ft. O.C. - Small individual flower containers • Street materiality: Pavement • Sidewalk materiality: Brick • Additional structures/amenities: - Covered bus stops - Plenty of outdoor seating at restaurants • Additional spaces: - Park space at beginning of street - Plaza and statue at the terminating point • Modes of transportation: - Car only allowed at certain points - Streetcar/cable car - Bike lanes - Large sidewalk for pedestrians • Number of lanes of traffic: 2, streetcar paths • On-street parking: One side in select spots • Crosswalk conditions: - Decently marked - No lights - Not a huge criteria given the lack of vehicles • Pedestrian feel: -Extremely safe; wide sidewalks and separated from the traffic - Feels well-designed for the human scale • Other appeals: - Dead-ends into statue and an art museum - Protected pedestrian flow

project 1.3 great streets

Monument Circle Figure Ground

Market Street Section/Plan project 1.3 great streets

unit no.2 en v ision in g an u r ba n v illa g e pl an

project overview

pr o je c t 2 . 1 i nv e nt o r y & a n a ly sis

In an effort to apply the research and findings from the Urban Design Intensive of Unit 1 and put them into practice, we were asked to assess a portion of east downtown Muncie. For the first phase of this project, we sought to gather information and document elements within the project area through an inventory and analysis exercise. This analysis was to be completed in a way that mimicked those of Catherine Dee and Kevin Lynch. In order to complete this task, I set out across the eastern portions of Muncie with my maps pulled up and my camera at the ready. I thoroughly investigated the entirety of the site, taking photos at important locations. In doing so, I was able to construct a series of diagrams, highlighting key roads and vehicular circulation, pedestrian paths and walkability, and lastly, landmarks and nodes of activity. Additionally, after compiling the data gathered, I was able to develop a SWOT Analysis map, identifying where the site has found success, as well as opportunities for improvement. This first step in the design process played a critical role in the following phases.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN Site Inventory & Analysis Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

SWOT ANALYSIS

Strengths

Weaknesses

Opportunities

Threats

IMAGE SET Strengths: Strong, established downtown - Exiting trail system - New Kitselman trail head Weaknesses: Stretch of Route. 32 - Busy, fast moving streets like MLK Blvd. and Madison St. Opportunities: Link with transit - Gateways - MadJax Area - Connecting to the River - Old Depot Node Threats: Push back from homeowners - Complications with railroads

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

Site Inventory & Analysis

Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

KEY ROADS - PART 1

KEY ROADS - PART 2

IMAGE SET

IMAGE SET A. - Jackson St.: A 2-lane, one-way road that is constantly busy and filled with fast moving vehicles. B. - Main St: Another 2-lane, one-way street. Vehicles often fly down the road. C. - Rt. 32: The roadway here is a compact 2 lane portion focused on vehicular movement. D. - Rt. 32: Here, Rt. 32 is a 4 lane highway, providing only vehicular circulation.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

Site Inventory & Analysis

Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

TRANSIT

A. - N. Walnut St.: Connects from McGalliard, past Minnetrista and MCHS, and into downtown. B. - S. Walnut St.: Provides a connection to the South side of Muncie. C. - Dr. MLK Blvd.: A fast-moving, four lane boulevard that creates a barrier for pedestrians. D. - Madison St.: Links the MadJax node to the South side.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

EXISTING CORRIDORS

IMAGE SET A. - Transit Station: The MITs station is the heart and soul of Muncieâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s transit routes. B. - Route no. 5: Provides access to the southern neighborhoods via Madison St. C. - Route no. 10: Runs along MLK Drive up to McGalliard. D. - Route no. 7: This route runs to the East of downtown along Rt. 32.

IMAGE SET A. - Walnut St. Corridor: Serves as the main corridor through the downtown area. B. - McCulloch/Bunch Blvd.: A winding, scenic roadway along the White River. C. - Cardinal Greenway: A pedestrian-oriented corridor through natural and urban areas D. - Historic Main St.: Serves as the entrance to the downtown area traveling from the East.

project 2.1 inventory & analysis

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

Site Inventory & Analysis

Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

KEY NODES - PART 1

KEY NODES - PART 2

IMAGE SET

IMAGE SET A. - The Minnetrista Node: Located at the intersection of Walnut, Highland, and the White River Greenway. B. - The Trails Node: A key meeting point of the Cardinal and White River Greenway. C. - The Roundabout Node: This on the southern end of downtown is a key divergence of roads D. - The Interchange Node: A gateway opportunity at the meeting point of the Rt. 35 bypass and Rt. 32.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

Site Inventory & Analysis

Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

LANDMARKS - PART 1

A. - The Main/Jackson/Walnut Node: A key transit and circulation node in the heart of downtown. B. - The Depot Node: Meeting of a major road, a Cardinal Greenway Trailhead, and a landmark. C. - The MadJax Node: An additional divergence within the downtown. D. - The Kitselman Node: Another key intersection of trails and a new gateway.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN

LANDMARKS - PART 2

IMAGE SET

A. - Edmund Burke Ball Memorial: Located a complex intersection where Walnut Street splits. B. - Greenway Bridge: Serves as a key placemaking element at the White River and Cardinal Greenway intersection. C. - The Old Depot: A historic old depot that serves as a trailhead for the Cardinal Greenway D. - Passing of the Buffalo Statue: Acts as a gateway on the southern edge of downtown.

A. - Muncie Public Library: A historic structure located on edges of downtown. B. - George McCulloch Memorial: His statue stands tall on the southern end of McCulloch Park. C. - Cornerstone: Another looming, historic building located within downtown. D. - Art Installation: A vibrant sculpture that is nearly impossible to miss.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN Site Inventory & Analysis Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

WALKABILITY

IMAGE SET A. - We can find wide sidewalks within the downtown area, creating a better pedestrian flow. B. - MLK Blvd. offers very little in terms of walkability, and may even act as a barrier. C. - Many sidewalks on side streets are degrades and in disrepair. D. - Nearly all of Rt. 32 is focused on vehicular circulation rather than pedestrian.

Envisioning An Urban Village Plan: Muncie, IN Site Inventory & Analysis Jake Senne | Sept. 21, 2020

PEDESTRIAN PATHS

IMAGE SET A. - Bike lanes: The most influential bike lanes are located along Walnut and Washington B. - Cardinal Greenway: A key pedestrian pathway providing circulation across Muncie. C. - White River Trail: Provides a scenic trail along the Riverâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Banks. D. - Cardinal Greenway: This trail connects regionally outside of Muncie as well.

project 2.1 inventory & analysis

unit no.2 en v ision in g an u r ba n v illa g e pl an

project overview

Following the initial inventory and analysis project, the second phase of this project began with our studio being organized into teams based on the “information neighborhoods” which we had studied in Unit 1. Our team consisted of Mia Baker, Sarah Bilbrey, Cole Cochard, Cameron McSorely, and myself. From there, our team gathered virtually to compare our findings from the first phase, as well presenting the philosophies from our literature reviews. In doing so, our team was able to successfully construct a vision for the future of the site. Our vision for the site, which is provided in full on the following page, was built on the basis of five key concepts: improving accessibility, enhancing the White River corridor, providing for a diverse set of users and uses, strengthening the identity of the site, and creating a connected, walkable network for pedestrians.

pr o je c t 2 . 2 vi s io n p la n

This combination of the concepts within the vision plan led us to the overarching idea of “Bridging the Divide,” connecting communities across the White River. Note: the graphics on the following pages were produced by Mia Baker.

The vision for East Downtown Muncie is to connect communities across the White River through the strategic use of paths and nodes. This parcel of land has many meaningful points of connection, both for vehicular and pedestrian circulation. We intend to use these points to strengthen the identity and diversity in Muncie, Indiana while bridging the divide between the North and South sides of the White River. I. Design a space that is accessible A. Provide transportation options for a variety of users B. Emphasize legibility of thresholds as connections C. Improve intersection conflicts where present D. Improve crossing characteristics (bridging) II. Create a spine of connections along the White River corridor A. Provide a sense of anticipation through destinations + points of interest B. Improve access to the White River Greenway for pedestrians C. Implement additional pedestrian bridges across the White River III. Provide spaces designated to a diversity of users + uses A. Increase density of housing types near key connections of transportation B. Design for areas of mixed-use development C. Introduce additional grocery stores + markets IV. Create a unified design that visually connects the north and south sides of the White River A. Improve overall image of downtown + surrounding areas B. Provide artistic elements to improve wayfinding C. Strengthen the identity of Muncie D. Invite local artists to create murals or other public artworks within the city V. Create walkable spaces to increase pedestrian connectivity A. Design for pedestrian-only corridors B. Emphasize equal access to gathering spaces C. Ensure equal access to parks and green spaces

Major Nodes Minor Nodes New Pedestrian Crossing Areas for Integration Green Belt Major Vehicular Routes New Mixed Use Areas

project 2.2 vision plan

BRIDGING THE DIVIDE

C O N N E C T I O N C O N N E C T I O N

Accessibility for multiple mode

ENHANCING

THE

ENHANCING

Links to the White River corridor

WHITE

THE

I D E N T I T Y I D E N T I T Y

RIVER

WHITE

RIVER

Unique design language that across “the divide” Enhanced

es of transportation

stitches the urban fabric d visual character to Muncie

D I V E R S I T Y

Enhanced experiential quality for an array of users + uses

S A F E T Y

Transportation for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles

project 2.2 vision plan

unit no.2 en v ision in g an u r b a n v illa g e pl an

project overview

pr o je c t 2 . 3 co n c e p t p la n

The final phase of our Envisioning an Urban Village Plan Unit called for our team to develop a concept plan for the eastern portions of downtown Muncie. This was completed in conjunction with the vision plan exercise, allowing for a back and forth design process between the two. The concept plan, which essentially builds upon the ideas developed in the vision plan, provides a more detailed description of how our team envisions the future of the site. This plan features a number of improvements and additions to the east side of the city. These include road diets and corridor enchancement along Route 32 and Dr. MLK Boulevard, the implementation of new bike lanes, and the utilization of landmark features at key points entering the area. Additionally, the concept plan identifies the key nodes of activity and locations where infill may be necessary. Furthermore, our design determined three roadways that could be transitioned to pedestrian-only corridors, reducing dependence on automobiles. Lastly, the plan proposes two new pedestrian bridges, over the river and the busy MLK Boulevard, to further improve walkability and bridge the divide.

Connecting communitie

Conceptual Master Plan fo

Mia Baker, Sarah Bilbrey, Cole Cocha

September 28th, 2020 | LA 403 |

Madison St.

Walnut St.

Washington St. Main St. Jackson St.

Macedonia Ave.

Doctor MLK Jr. Blvd.

Highland Ave.

es across the White River

or East Downtown Muncie

ard, Cam McSorley, and Jake Senne

| Profs. Hildner and Farnsworth

Legend: Existing Roads

Proposed Pedestrian Belt

Existing Trail System

Proposed Trail

Existing Bike Lane

Proposed Bike Lane

Existing Functional Pedestrian Bridge

Proposed Pedestrian Bridge

Key Nodes

Corridor Enhancement

Proposed Gateway / Landmark Feature

Proposed Re-development or Infill Locations

Improved Transit Stops

Route 32

0’

800’

1600’

Scale: 1” = 400’

3200’ North

project 2.2 concept plan

unit no.3 desig n in g an u r ba n v illa ge

project overview

The third unit of this studio was a collaborative process with students from the ARCH 403 studio. Our landscape team, comprised of Sarah Bisch and myself, teamed up with Malequi Picazo in order to complete this project. The project statement called for us to design a site plan for his building, but we decided to push the boundaries and create an entire village surrounding his proposed research center. The design process began with a site visit to look at existing opportunities and weaknesses of the site. From there, Sarah and I began the conceptual design phase, each completing a few layouts and morphing those into one diagram, and then taking our two concepts and fusing them together to form the final desired layout. From there, we began developing building footprints, identifying spatial relationships, and establishing our vision for the village. This led to our schematic design for the neighborhood.

pr o je c t 3 . 1 sche m a t ic d e sig n

Note: As stated prior, this project was done in collaboration with Sarah Bisch and Malequi Picazo. Their graphic contributions will be indicated where necessary.

Site Inventory & Analysis

project 3.1 schematic design

Concepts

PARKING

SOLAR STATION

TOWN HOMES

P P COTTAGES / SINGLE-FAMILY

MIXED-USE TRANSIT CENTER

COMMERCIAL / RETAIL

MIXED-USE

P COMMERCIAL / RETAIL

RETAIL

TECH DEV. / OFFICE SPACE

EX. WATER TREATMENT PLANT

BIKE SHOP

APARTMENTS

MIXED-USE

GROCERY / MARKET

ROW-HOUSES

RESTAURANT RESEARCH CENTER ROUTE 32 ROAD DIET TECH DEV. / OFFICE SPACE

CONNECTION TO KITSELMAN TRAILHEAD

ALTERNATE POWER GENERATION CENTER

MANUFACTURING / INDUSTRIAL TRANSIT CENTER

PARKING

MANUFACTURING / INDUSTRIAL

KITSELMAN CROSSING || MASTER PLAN 0’

Schematic Plan

100’

200’

400’ N

Two and three story mixed-use buildings feature retail and commercial uses on the first floor and offer living opportunities on the upper stories

Emphasis on providing affordable, sustainable public transportation

Graphic by Sarah Bisch

A variety of housing and building types creates an identity for the neighborhood, increases comfort, and limits monotony.

Pedestrian focused design, a network of green spaces, and implementation of bike lanes reduce the need for vehicular circulation

Development centered around a series of green spaces that serve as a natural water retention feature

project 3.1 schematic design

unit no.3 desig n in g an u r ba n v illa ge

project overview

pr o je c t 3 . 2 d e s i g n d e v e lo p m en t

As we progressed from the schematic design phase into a more detailed site plan, we quickly began addressing the flaws and lacking areas of the previous phase. This included making revisions to layouts, adding in more precise dimensions, establishing a common right of way width, and flushing out some areas that had been overlooked in the schematic design. This phase also allowed us to begin designing some more of the critical elements of our design, namely the stormwater retention basins and the site directly around Malequiâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s research center. Additionally, we began exploring the spatial relationships of spaces along our pedestrian trail in a serial vision-esque series of sketches. Meanwhile, Malequi progressed with the design of the building, allowing us to develop a material palette for the site. Similar to his timber-frame building, we went with a set of natural, sustainably-conscience materials. Note: As stated prior, this project was done in collaboration with Sarah Bisch and Malequi Picazo. Their graphic contributions will be indicated where necessary.

Site Plan Graphics by Sarah Bisch

Site Circulation

Graphics by Sarah Bisch project 3.2 design development

Graphic by Malequi Picazo

Graphics by Malequi Picazo project 3.2 design development

unit no.3 desig n in g an u r ba n v illa ge

project overview

pr o je c t 3 . 3 fi n a l d e sig n

In the final phase of the design process, we ultimately refined and built upon changes discussed in the previous two iterations. The final set of deliverables allows the viewer to understand the spatial and experiential relationships within the urban village, as well as creating an identity for the community. Reflecting back on this collaborative process as a whole, I can personally say I was incredibly pleased with our team. We all stayed on task, completed deliverables as necessary, and respected each otherâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s deadlines and expectations. Our communication was both timely and effective, and allowed us to produce the best work possible. Having been involved with less than stellar multidisciplinary team efforts in the past, this project was a great change of pace. I think that this successful experience working outside of our profession was important to myself and others in the studio, and will serve us well in the future. Note: As stated prior, this project was done in collaboration with Sarah Bisch and Malequi Picazo. Their graphic contributions will be indicated where necessary.

Circulation

Multi-modal Transportation

Building Use

Public vs. Private

“Keitselman Crossing re-imagines the post-industrial land into a community driven mixed-used development anchoring the Mayfield neighborhood while also serving as a gateway in and out of Muncie, uniting the separated North and South sides of the White River.”

SOLAR STATION & SOLAR FIELD NO. 2 PARKING

PRAIRIE

TOWN HOUSES

MUNCIE LIGHTRAIL LOADING PLATFORM

MIXED - USE MIXED - USE

TRANSIT CENTER

SINGLE FAMILY HOMES

“THE WETLANDS”

COMMERCIAL / RETAIL

MIXED - USE

RETAIL APARTMENTS

TECH DEVELOPMENT / OFFICE SPACE

EXISTING WATER TREATMENT FACILITY

MIXED - USE

ROW HOUSES BIKE SHOP WHITE RIVER GREENWAY

GROCERY / MARKET

FLOODABLE AMPHITHEATER

RESTAURANTS / RETAIL

PRAIRIE

RESEARCH CENTER

“THE ALLEYWAY” CONNECTION TO KITSELMAN TRAILHEAD

TECH DEVELOPMENT / OFFICE SPACE

SOLAR FIELD NO. 1

MANUFACTURING

PRAIRIE

ALTERNATE POWER GENERATION CENTER

TRANSIT CENTER

PARKING MANUFACTURING

0’

100’ 200’

400’ N project 3.3 final design

Graphic by Sarah Bisch Kiteslman Crossing places a heavy emphasis on the pedestrian experience of its residents and visitors alike. In order to evoke a comfortable and familiar feeling within its users, the site is designed to compliment the human scale, in terms of both walkability and the vertical relationships. Building heights are limited to a maximum of three stories, however, a majority of the structures are only one or two stories, creating that pleasant village atmosphere. Additionally, the assortment of shopping locations, dining opportunities, and activities linked by the network of pedestrian pathways lends itself to a dynamic, vibrant ambiance within the neighborhood. Outdoor dining and programmed seating spaces along the pathways and sidewalks increase the overall appeal of users. These factors are a driving force to fabricating an enjoyable pedestrian experience.

Graphic by Sarah Bisch

project 3.3 final design

ROAD TYPOLOGY NO. 1

Studio

Floorplan and renderings by Malequi Picazo

4’

5’

11’

5’

4’

5.5’

SIDEWALK BIKE LANE PLANTED BUFFER

Building Space

Science Lab

5.5’

DRIVE LANE

Large Testing Lab

7’

TURN LANE

Restrooms Building Space

9’

DRIVE LANE

Science Lab

4.5’

PLANTED BUFFER BIKE LANE SIDEWALK

Student Lounge

10.5’

SIDEWALK

Material Store

Climate Controlled Lab

ab nL tio ula Sim

Library / Research Research Center Center

ffic yO

lt cu Fa

Loading Dock

10.5’

PARALLEL PARKING

Secondary Entrance

Mechanical

4.5’

ROUTE 32 ROAD DIET

BIKE LANE

Lobby / Gallery Loading Bay / Storage

9’

DRIVE LANE

Cafe

7’

DRIVE LANE

Restrooms

Classrooms

7’

BIKE LANE

Main Entrance

13.5’

PARALLEL PARKING

10.5’

SIDEWALK

10.5’

ROAD TYPOLOGY NO. 3

SIDEWALK

13.5’

60° ANGLE PARKING

SIDEWALK

PARALLEL PARKING

DRIVE LANE

7’

DRIVE LANE

8.5’

DRIVE LANE

9’

60° ANGLE PARKING

10.5’

SIDEWALK

6’

PLANTED MEDIAN

10.5’

DRIVE LANE

SIDEWALK

Large Lecture Hall

9’

PARALLEL PARKING

8.5’

ROAD TYPOLOGY NO. 2

Parking Commercial District Research Center