JINGCHENG HUANG EDUCATION
hhhhuang@ucdavis.edu | (530)-761-6853 4500 Alhambra Dr, Apt 157 Davis, CA 95618
Work Sample 2017-2018
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Senior - Class of 2018 Pursuing Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture
WORK EXPERIENCE
ATKINS Landscape Architecture Intern | June 2017 to August 2017 in Shanghai, China • Participated in schematic design and design development for 4 projects including Window of Canton and Huajia Tourism Town • Collected and visualized data for site analysis • Prepared design draftings and presented to clients
JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS & SANFEN ARCHITECTS Landscape Architecture Intern|June 2016 to July 2016 in Shenzhen, China • Worked cloesly on real-life commercial and residential landscape projects • Created SketchUp models of high-rise buildings and landscapes
UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Student Mentor|Fall 2016 & Fall 2017 in Davis, CA • Co-taught discussion sessions for Introduction to landscape architecture • Held weekly office hours to help students with papers, sketchings and other course related questions
ISTOCK & SHUTTERSTOCK Stock Photographer|July 2016 to Present • Produce and publish high-quality stock photographs • Used by various websites and news press such as Wall Street Journal and US News SKILL SUMMARY
SOFTWARE Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Lightroom), SketchUp, Rhino, Grasshopper, AutoCAD, Vectorworks, GIS, V-Ray, Lumion, Office Suite
DESIGN Hand Drafting, 3D-Modeling & Rendering, Data Crawling, Photography
COMMUNICATION Copywriting, Public Speaking, Fluent in English and Chinese (Mandarin) HONORS
• 2018 Photographer's Forum 38th College Photography Contest, Finalist • 2017 PricewaterhouseCoopers National Case Competition, Finalist, Davis, CA • 2017 Spring Dean’s Honor List, UC Davis • 2017 UCD ASLA Professional Dinner, Student Work Exhibition, Davis, CA
01
Subtle & Sublime
02
Retrieving the Lost Linkage
03
Stepping into the Delta
04
Reconnecting San Jose
05
Window of Canton
06
Huojia Tourism Town
07
Pond, Pavilion and Lofts
Shoreline & Salt Pond Restoration
Ecological Restoration
Landscape Design
Urban Design & Planning
Professional Work of Landscape Design Development
Professional Work of Landscape Schematic Design
Construction Document Set
1. Subtle & Sublime
Shoreline & Salt Pond Restoration Upper Division Studio (On-Going) Induvidual Work at UC Davis Instructor: Brett Milligan Winter 2018
MASTER PLAN Alameda Creek Wind
EELGRASS HABITAT
00
40 -FT
San Francisco Bay
R
ALGAE HABITAT & SEDIMENTS
Breach
t
en
gm
Se Breach Sensing Station
Ala
me
da
Cr
ee
k
CONTEXT
OYSTER FARM
Eden Landing Ecological Reserve is a nature reserve in Hayward and Union City, California, on the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay. As a part of Resilient by Design challenge, this project focuses on the outer barrier, which proposes a breakwater system on the bay side, an enhanced levee and land mass on the inland. The goal is to restore the salt ponds into wildlife habitats and protect the surrounding community from sea level rise.
45
TARGET SPECIES Fish
Black Surfperch Bay Pipefish
n
Sa
o isc
y
Ba
nc
Fra
Shell
Mussel Native Oysters
Bird
Forster’s Terns Wading Birds Ridgway's Rail (ENDANGERED)
Mudflat
Rodent
SECTION DIAGRAM
Plants
Historical Elevation Current Elevation Proposed Elevation
Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse(ENDANGERED) Eelgrass Gumplants Pickleweed Cordgrass
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
San F
No Water
Water Level: 10 FT 3 FT Sea Level Rise
Water Level: 14 FT 7 FT Sea Level Rise
REINFORCED LEVEE
nd
Po UPLAND TRANSITION ZONE T
0F
60
SEDIMENT LANDFORM
T
0F
10
0
40 FT
T
0F
40
FT
SALT PAN
1
HA
REEF BALLS 0
1:1
GRAVEL
0.
50
BIRD ISLANDS
0
1:3
0 10 FT
Francisco Bay
Gumplants Pickleweed Cordgrass
Sediment Accumulation and Mini Salt Pond Formation Reinforced Levee
Upland Transition Zone (UTZ)
Landforms
Pond
Bird Nesting Islands
Not To Scale
BREAKWATER SYSTEM Realflow Simulation
1
Wave collides with the first layer of breakwater - Oyster Farm.
2
Wave passes the first laye
First Layer: Oyster Farm
Three rows of oyster beds located 850 ft away from the levee that promote eelgrass habitat and create small-scale oyster production.
PHA
2
Second Layer: Reef Balls
Three layers of concrete reef balls located 400 ft away from the levee that create marine reef habitat as well as promote algae growth and sediment accumulation.
Sediment Landform: Water Flow
Bird Islands: Wind Pattern
RESILIENT LANDFORM
When water flows in and out from breaches, the meandering sediment landforms can accumulate sediment and create small salt pans on the back of levee. Clusters of bird island, located 600 feet from levee, consist of three 1-ha linear islands placed perpendicular to wind direction in order to promote bird nesting opportunities. Space between islands will likely to accumulate sediments and promote algae growth.
The c throu
er and collides with the second layer.
3
4
Wave energy is reduced when water encounters the levee.
Water refluxes and the next round of wave begins.
ASING DIAGRAM
2018
current levee is 25 feet wide. Water comes in ugh breaches to the pond. Habitat is limited.
2028
Eelgrass habitat will be established around oyster farm. Sediment and algae will appear around reef balls.
2038
Water will have eroded and pushed the reinforced levee. Accretion of Sediment and algae will continue.
Oyster Farm
SPECIES AND HABITATS
SENSING ST FORSTER’S TERN
RIDGEWAY’S RAIL
ANIMALS
HARVEST MOUSE
CORDGRASS
PICKLEWEED
EELGRASS
PLANT SPECIES
ALGAE
OYSTER
MUSSEL
FISH
AQUATIC SPECIES
ISLAND
OPEN WATER
SALT MARSH
HABITAT TYPE
RE
ming
Education Program
Ecological Research
TATION
SENSING PLATFORM
EEF BALLS
ALGAES
MARINE LAB FLOATING DECK
EELGRASS
OYSTER FARM
2. Retrieving the Lost Linkage Ecological Restoration Upper Division Studio Induvidual Work at UC Davis Instructor: Steve Grevo Fall 2017
HWY 113
Site Context
H RT
NO
UCD CAMPUS
LD
O
H
RT
NO
RK
FO
RK
0
Y8
FO
HW
UCD ARBORETUM
WATER PUMP
PU
TA
HC
AGRICULTURE LAND
RE
EK AGRICULTURE LAND
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
HW
Y
80
PUTAH CREEK
PAST:
TODAY:
FUTURE:
In the past, Putah Creek used to flow from west to east, so did the North Fork Channel, which now flows from east to west. As a result of this change, the west portion of the North Fork dried out and become underused. The land use for this surrounding area is mainly agriculture, which is not desirable for animals.
Overall Greenway Inventory and Focused Area WEST SACRAMENTO
DAVIS WINTERS
DIXON
VACAVILLE
CWHR TYPE
Dam Trail
100 Year Flood Plain
Annual Grassland
Fishing Access
Urban
Barren
Putah Creek
Water Plant
0
1
2
4 Miles
Blue Oak Woodland, Blue Oak-Foothill Pine
Bridge
Cropland ACCESS TYPE
Canal
Eucalyptus, Urban
Highway
No Public Access
Fresh Emergent Wetland
Local Road
Open Access
Riverine
Bike Trail
Restricted Access
Urban
Levee
Unknown Access
Valley Foothill Riparian
Focal Species Study
Mule Deer
White Tailed Kite
Swainson's Hawk
Giant Gatersnake
AGR
Agriculture
FEW
Western Pond Turtle
Chinook Salmon
Node 1
Node 2
Fresh Emergent Wetland
VOW
Node 3
Vallehy Oak Woodland
VRI
Node 4
HABITAT TYPE
NODE
Valley Riparian
SPECIES
By reintroducing water into this area, the entire North Fork will reconnect with Putah Creek. In addition, confluences of river will create more opportunities to establish diverse habitat types, especially fresh emergent wetland to acquire more species and provide corridors for animals.
Site Plan
NODE 1: Water Divergence
NODE 2: Highway Reconstruction
AGR
VOW
Agriculture
Vallehy Oak Woodland
VOW
VRI
Vallehy Oak Woodland
Valley Riparian
VRI
Valley Riparian
NODE 3: Habitats Establishment
NODE 4: Water Remerge
FEW
AGR
VOW
FEW
VRI
VRI
Fresh Emergent Wetland
Vallehy Oak Woodland
Valley Riparian
Agriculture
Fresh Emergent Wetland
Valley Riparian
3. Stepping into the Delta Landscape Design
ACTIVITIES IN THE DELTA
Upper Division Studio Induvidual Work at UC Davis Instructor: Elizabeth Boults Winter 2017
BOATING
CAMPING & RV
BIRD WATCHING
WATERSKIING
GOLF
FISHING & HUNTING
Opportunities: aeration of water can combat eutrophication and visitors experience nature Constraints: biological contamination, pollution, unnatural change in geomorphology and hydrology Opportunities: people experience nature through a quiet relatively non invasive activity Constraints: materials and infrastructure
Opportunities: increased job opportunities Constraints: destruction of natural lands and unsustainable usage of water and fertilizer
SITE ANALYSIS
CONTEXT
Opportunities: bring family and friends closer, provide natural area for people to enjoy Constraints: harmful effects to ecosystem due to waste and increased CO2 emission
Opportunities: water aeration combats eutrophication Constraints: noise, pollution, biological contamination, disturbance and dislocation of wildlife
Opportunities: seasonal social events bring community together and closer to nature Constraints: harmful effects on the ecosystem due to overfishing and pollution
Sacramento
Stockton Antioch
The site locates within a local winery called Old Sugar Mill in Clarksburg, CA. The site is an underused area at the back of the winery buildings and is adjacent to the Sacramento River. The opportunities of this site include reconnecting the surrounding community at multiple levels, as well as providing a destination for outdoors and water related activities in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
0
0.5
1
2 MILES
MASTER PLAN 1 2
3
-3
4
+4 24
6
5
-4
+10
+4 +3
7
-6
22
+4
8
+2
21
19 20
9 10
+9
11 23
12
14
13
18
16
+30
+15
+20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Car Entrance Bike Access Bus Parking Car Parking Gift Shop Restroom Winery Access Great Lawn
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Water Fountain Observation Deck Grass Terrace Delta Orchard Restaurants & Bars Green Roof Sitting Terrace Bamboo Wall
SECTION ELEVATION
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
15
Grove Bridge Floating Dock The Delta Barge Bioswale Floral Garden Outdoor Sitting Area Detention Basin
17
N
0
45
90
180 ft
EDUCATION
EVENTS
CONNECTION
HARDSCAPE COVER
SOFTSCAPE COVER
COMMUNITY
DRAINAGE PATTERN
4. Reconnecting San Jose
Midtown San Jose 2050 Plan DOWNTOWN
Upper Division Studio at UC Davis Collaborator: Liya Ma, Cameron Gee Instructor: Elizabeth Boults Spring 2017
ST. LEO
SAN JOSE AIRPORT
SANTA CLARA
KOREATOWN
JAPANTOWN
DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE
UPTOWN SAN JOSE
DOWNTOWN
CONNECTIONS at VARIOUS SCALES
WEST SAN JOSE
Midtown San Jose is in between two highly active areas, Wet San Jose and Downtown San Jose. The goal of this project is to address the disconnection between these two areas by promoting connections at various scale within and around the site.
HIGHWAY RAILWAY ACTIVITY MIDTOWN
1
Provide Equitable Access to Different Land Use Types
2
Establish Effective Transportation Methods
3
Historical Preservation and Cultural Development
4
Create Safe, Walkable, and Accessible Neighborhoods
5
Environmental Sustainability and Adaptability
$15,000-49,999
ASIAN
32
%
0-14
$0-15,000
%
12
55-74
$50,000-99,999
14%
5%
28%
5%
35%
%
21
%
AFRICAN AMERICAN 75-84+
DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL
15-34
32
27%
21%
HISPANIC
As the economic and cultural leader of Silicon Valley and one of the most populous cities in the United States, San Jose is an important driver of innovation heading into the mid-21st century. The Specific Plan 2050 focuses on strengthening the connection between two highly active areas, Downtown and West San Jose. The Plan also aims to develop the interconnectivity of Midtown neighborhoods, helping to give Midtown a more cohesive physical identity. An efficient transit network will establish connectivity at a smaller scale and reinforce this physical identity. The Plan includes land use policies to identify strategic areas where Midtown will be developed. In addition, policies focus on providing accessible transportation and pedestrian-oriented streetscapes, maximizing environmental sustainability, and increasing the quality of life in Midtown.
7%
WESTFIELD
30%
$200,000+ 30%
35-54
$100,000-199,999
WHITE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL HIGH TO VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LIGHT INDUSTURIAL AGRICULTURE AND OPEN SPACE
1 O’CONNOR PARK 2 CAHILL PARK 3 DEL MONTE PARK
POPULATION: 3291 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: $106,307
2
MEDIAN HOME VALUE: $430,300
TRAIN MAJOR VEHICLE CIRCULATION
MEDIUM TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMBINED INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL
POPULATION: 5745 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: $82,192 MEDIAN HOME VALUE: $426,400 3
1
EXISTING LAND USE ZONING MAP
COMMUNITY PARK
GENTRIFICATION MAP AND DATA
TRANSIT CIRCULATION
PROPOSED LAND USE
PARK/OPEN SPACE ACREAGE: 30 ACRES FAR: 0
HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL ACREAGE: 6.6 ACRES FAR: 4.5
DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL MIXED USE AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PARK/PUBLIC OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACREAGE: 7.5 ACRES FAR: 1.5
TRANSIT HUB ACREAGE: 5.0 ACRES FAR: 2.0
MIXED USE AREA ACREAGE: 18 ACRES FAR: 4.0
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE: 7.0 ACRES TOTAL UNITS: 35 FAR: 1.8
COMBINED INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL
0
100 200
400 ft
INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE: 40 ACRES FAR: 2.5
Los Gatos Creek Trail
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE: 27.0 ACRES TOTAL UNITS: 945 FAR: 3.6
EXPLODED VIEW TREE COVERAGE
PARK & GREEN SPACE
TRANSIT HUB & RAILWAY
HYPERLOOP
Transit Hub and Front Plaza TRAIN LRT LRT BART RESIDENTIAL
DOWNTOW COMMERCIA
BUILDING FOOTPRINT
ROADWAY SYSTEM PARK
NERBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
TRANSPORTATION HUB
MIDTOWN SAN JOSE
Section B-B: Trail Intervention
Section A-A: Transit Hub HYPERLOOP TRAIN LRT LRT BART
RESIDENTIAL
PARK
TRANSPORTATION HUB NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL MIX USED COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45’
50’
5. Window of Canton
Landscape Design Development Professional Work at Atkins Summer Internship 2017 Contribution: 3D Model, Master Plan, Section, Render
6. Huojia Tourism Town
Schematic Landscape Design Professional Work at Atkins Summer Internship 2017 Contribution: Site Analysis, Concept, 3D Model, Rendering, Presentaion
6. Pond, Pavilion and Lofts
Construction Document Set Upper Division Studio Induvidual Work at UC Davis Instructor: Keith Wilson & Marq Truscott Fall 2017
LAYOUT NOTES 1.
VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THERE ARE ANY SUBSTANTIAL DISCREPANCIES. SITE WORK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING. 3. ALL TRADES SHALL COORDINATE WORK SO PROGRESS OF WORK IS NOT INTERRUPTED AND CAN BE COMPLETED IN A TIMELY MANNER. 4. ALL MATERIALS & FINISHES SHALL BE AS PER THE DRAWINGS, DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SOME MATERIALS MAY REQUIRE A SEVERAL WEEK ORDER LEAD TIME. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING ANY & ALL ORDERING LEAD TIMES & PROVIDING THE REQUIRED MATERIALS AT THE PROJECT SITE IN A TIMELY MANNER. NO UNAPPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ALLOWED. CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF A SPECIFIED MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE. 5. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENT OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. IN THE EVENT ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 6. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EDGE OF CONCRETE FLATWORK, FACE OF CURB, OR CENTER POINT OF RADIUS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. NEW CONCRETE FLATWORK SHALL MEET GRADE OF EXISTING CONCRETE FLATWORK OR OTHER PAVING. WHERE NEW CONCRETE IS PLACED ADJACENT TO CURB(S) OR (E)TC:312.8 (E)TC:312.8JOINT SHALL BE INSTALLED EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, A CONTINUOUS EXPANSION BETWEEN THE NEW CONCRETE FLATWORK AND(E)BC:312.2 EXISTING CURB(S), CONCRETE (E)BC:312.2 FLATWORK OR OTHER PAVING. 8. ALL SLEEVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE WORK. REFER TO IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SLEEVING LOCATIONS. FG:312.5 SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE 9. THE CONTRACTOR RIM:312.0FOR REPAIRING, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST RIM:3 TO THE OWNER, ANY EXISTING AREA DESIGNATED TO REMAIN WHICH IS DISTURBED AS INV:3 INV:309.4 RIM:311.4 A CONSEQUENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. REFER TO INV:309.7 2% HP:312.2 2% HP:312.8 ARCHITECTURAL AND 2 CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 1 1 FG:311.2 RIM:312.8 1 RIM:312.8 (E)FFE:312.8 INV:307.9 (E)TC:312.8 INV:307.4 (E) FS:312.8 (E)BC:312.2 (E) FS:31 BC:310.8 TC:313.3 TC:313.3 RIM:312.8 RIM:312.8 RIM:312.8 INV:308.2 INV:307.6 INV:307.6 TC:313.3 2 1 3 1 LAYOUT KEYNOTES FG:311.3 FG:311.3 BC:310.8 (E) FS:312 (E) FS:312.8 FG:311.3 1% 1% 1. WORKPLACE BUILDING A, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. BC:310.8 BC:310.8 2. WORKPLACE RIM:312.8 BUILDING B, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. TC:313.3 TC:313.3 3. WORKPLACE PLANS. INV:307.8 BUILDING C, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL RIM:312.8 RIM:312.8 4. WORKPLACE D, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 3 2 2 1 TC:313.3 BUILDING INV:307.2 5. ACCESSIBLE PAVING TO BEGIN BEYOND. INV:307.2 BC:310.8 RAMP, REFER TO CIVIL PLANS. COMMONS FG:311.3 FG:311.3 6. SITEFG:311.3 PAVING, REFER TO CIVIL PLANS. FS:312.8 (E)SEE (E) FS:31 7. BIKE RACK. ULTRA PLAY HORIZON BIKE RACK. DETAIL L2-A.
POB
10'
2'-3" 10'-7" 14'
4' 6' 6' TYP. 6' 6' TYP.TYP. TYP.TYP. 9' TYP. 20'-2"
9' TYP.
BASELINE 3'
10'-8" 14' 6'-2" 14'
13'-7" 27'-7" 14'
6' TYP.
2'-10" EQ EQ 2'-10"
12'-5"
EQ
7'-11" 7'-11" 5' 4' 7' 3'-6" 7' 3'-6" EQ 3'-3" 2'-9" 8'-3" 1'-6" 5' TYP. 16'
15'-3" EQ
EQ
12'-5"
EQ
2'-10" 3'-2" 3' EQ 5'-11" 6'-10" 2'-10"
8'-10"
7' 14'
27'-7"
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
8'-10"
6'-11"
13'-7"
14' 6'-2" 14' 12'-11" 5'-6"
GREENSCREEN TRELLIS. SEE DETAIL L2-B. BC:310.8 RIM:312.8JOINT L3-G. EXPANSION INV:307.4 SCORE JOINT L3-F. 2 TC:313.3 PLANTING AREA. SEE DETAIL SHEET P2. BC:310.8 RAINFG:311.3 GARDEN. SEE DETAIL L3-E. TW:313.7 SEATWALL. SEE DETAIL L2-C. BW:312.7 RIM:312.8 CONCRETE PAVING. SEE DETAIL L3-D. PEDESTRIAN INV:307.0 STAIRS. SEE DETAIL L2-C. 2 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 (E) FS:312.8 FG:311.3 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 RIM:312.7 RIM:312.8 INV:306.3 INV:306.6 RIM:312.8 2 TC:313.3 INV:306.1 BC:310.8 FG:311.3 FG:311.3 (E) FS:312.8 TC:313.3 RIM:312.8 BC:310.8 INV:306.2 FG:311.3 2 TC:313.3 RIM:312.8 BC:310.8 INV:305.7 FG:311.3 RIM:312.7 INV:305.5 (E) FS:312.8 (E)TC:312.8 (E)FFE:312.8 (E)BC:312.2 2% HP:312.2 2% 1 2 (E)RIM:311.9 RIM:311.9 (E)INV:305.6 (E)INV:305.7
1%
RIM:312.7 INV:307.4 FG:311.2
1%
TW:314.2 BW:312.7
1%
BASELINE
2.
1%
3
1%
1
1% 2
FG:311.2 BC:312.6 (E) FS:31 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 FG:311.3 RIM:312. INV:306.1 (E) FS:31 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 RIM:312. INV:305.7 FG:311.3 FG:311.2
2 1%
2
2
(E) FS:31 BC:310.8
1
2% H
RIM:31 INV:30
FG:312.5
0'
Payout Plan
10' 20' (1" = 20'-0")
(E)TC:312.8 (E)BC:312.2
(E)TC:312.8 (E)BC:312.2
(E)RIM:311.2 (E)INV:304.7
Grading P
2. 3.
3
4"
4.
6.
7.
RIM:311.4 INV:308.8
12.8
2
12.8
2
RIM:312.8 INV:307.1 TC:313.3 BC:312.7 FG:311.3
2
RIM:312.8 INV:306.7 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 FG:311.3
RIM:312.3 (E) INV:306.3 2
12.8 8 2%
12.5 07.9
Plan
4"
5.98 GPM (DRIP)
1"
0.27 / 30 PSI
10 1"
7 GPM (BUBBLER)
1.
1" 1" 2.
M
1" 3
3
3
4"
4"
4"
3
13 GPM (BUBBLER)
1"
2.55 / 30 PSI
3 3
4"
3.
7
POINT OF CONNECTION: CONNECT TO (E) 1 ½” WATER METER AND INSTALL 1 ½” GATE VALVE AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER BEFORE INSTALLING DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM SHOWN (FIELD VERIFY).
4. 5. 6.
4"
14
8 GPM (BUBBLER)
1"
2.55 / 30 PSI
15
4"
1"
7.
OPERATIN PLANS FOR OF 30 PSI THE CONT THE SYSTE CONDITION DIFFEREN ASSUME F IT IS THE R STRUCTUR DAMAGED AND INSTA AND FACIL DO NOT W THE FIELD DIMENSION OR DIFFER EVENT THA RESPONSI THIS DESIG AREAS AR POSSIBLE. THE CONT INSTALL A BE COVER ALL IRRIGA MANUFACT ALL IRRIGA
6.72 GPM (DRIP)
IRRIGATIO
0.27 / 30 PSI
SYMBOL
2.55 / 30 PSI
1" 4"
1.00 / 30 PSI
112"
3
3
IRRIGATIO
30.52 GPM (SPRAY)
11
5.25 GPM (DRIP)
1"
0.27 / 30 PSI
3
4" 4"
16
14 GPM (BUBBLER)
1"
2.55 / 30 PSI
17
8.20 GPM (DRIP)
1"
0.27 / 30 PSI 1"
A
3
4"
12 1"
3.82 GPM (DRIP)
CONTROLLER A LOCATION. EXTEND 1 EXTRA VALVE WIRE AND 1 COMMON WIRE AT THE END OF EACH MAINLINE STUB.
F
0.27 / 30 PSI
A
(E)RIM:311.9 (E)INV:306.2
NOT SHOWN
RIM:312.2 INV:306.6
FFE:312.8
HP:312.2
3
3
9
RIM:312.8 INV:307.9 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 FG:311.3
2 1%
6 12.8 3 8 3 .8 1 12.8 3 8 .8 7 3 2
RIM:312.8 INV:308.3 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 FG:311.3
RIM:312.8 INV:307.5 TC:313.3 BC:310.8 FG:311.3
11 4"
6 1½"
12/08/2017
2.8
1.00 / 30 PSI
W
2
1½"
J HUANG
8
20.79 GPM (SPRAY)
5
27.35 GPM (DRIP)
002
2
FFE:312.8
4
AND WALKS PLANTED IN SODDED TURF AND 21" BELOW CURBS AND WALKS PLANTED IN SEEDED TURF. COORDINATE ALL DRAIN LINE RUNS WITH TREES AND SHRUB PLANTING. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN ALL LANDSCAPE DRAINS AND GRATES. ALL DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE DISCONNECTED FROM UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE. DOWNSPOUTS WILL 3 " ADJACENT DISCHARGE 4TO LANDSCAPE AREAS. 3 4" 3 4" 4 GPM (BUBBLER) 8 4.58 GPM (DRIP) 13 1" 2.55 / 30 PSI 1" 0.27 / 30 PSI
9. 10. 11.
(E)TC:312.8 (E)BC:312.2
22.13 GPM (DRIP)
2
FG:312.5
(E)TC:312.8 (E)BC:312.2
GRADING PLAN
8
2%
3
FINISH GRADE IN PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE 3 21" BELOW TOP OF CURBS AND WALKS, 1" BELOW CURBS
8.
312.0 309.4 2% HP:312.2
23.1 GPM (SPRAY)
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING AT-GRADE UTILITIES (MANHOLES, VAULTS, BOXES, ETC..) SHALL BE LEFT AT EXISTING GRADES. PROPOSED ADJACENT FINISHED GRADES SHALL CONFORM TO EXISTING UTILITY GRADES WHERE POSSIBLE. CROSS-SLOPE SIDEWALKS 1.8% MAX IN DIRECTION INDICATED ON THE PLANS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GRADES INDICATED AT WALKWAYS ARE FINISHED SURFACE. CONFORM NEW PROPOSED FINISHED 1" SURFACE GRADES WITH ADJACENT EXISTING GRADES. CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF ANY 3 TREE CANOPIES ARE SHOWN DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE FIELD THAT AFFECT CONFORMANCE. 4" REFERENCE ONLY, 2% POSITIVE SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE ALL FINISHED LANDSCAPE GRADESFOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM REFER TO PLANTING PLAN. NOTED.
5.
FG:312.5
2
1½" 1.00 / 30 PSI 1½" 1.00 / 30 PSI 1½" 1.60 / 30 PSI 1½" 1.60 / 30 PSI THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING EXISTING CONDITIONS TO CONFORM TO THE FINISHED GRADES INDICATED ON THE PLANS.112" 112" 112" 11 4" DRAIN LINES, DRAIN INLETS, MANHOLES, ETC. ARE APPROXIMATE. REFER TO CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION, ELEVATION AND/OR LENGTH. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND/OR LANDSCAPE GRADING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS, EXISTING DRAINAGE1" STRUCTURES, STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND FINISHED FLOOR 1" ELEVATIONS WITH THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO 3 NOTIFY THE OWNER SHOULD THERE BE ANY3 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND THE ACTUAL SITE 4" 3 3 1" 4" 4" 4" CONDITIONS.
JH GROUP
GRADING NOTES 33.02 GPM (SPRAY) 1 1.
RIM:312.0 INV:307.0 0'
10' 20' (1" = 20'-0")
SHEET
G1 Irrigation Plan
0'
10' 20' (1" = 20'-0")
A
CONTROLLER/ HYDROZONE #