Campbell background on australian lndustry jefo2016

Page 1

Canada


Some background on the Australian industry qCompetiveness?? ØDon’t have the major diseases (PRRS ,Swine influenza ,PEDv) experienced by N America and Europe ØA collaborative and inclusive R&D and training model (Pork CRC and APL) ØProximity to Asia ØDifferentiated production – 80% of industry group house pregnant sows at weaning or within five days of mating ØDemand for Australian fresh pork increasing 3-4% annually over last four years and driving profitability and growth.

qChallenges ØReproduction?? ØFeed costs ØHousing – old ØClimate and water ØRegulation


A snap shot of the industry Statistic Producers (n) Sows (n) Slaughtered (000) Carcass weight (kg)* Volume (Tonne) Exports (Tonne) Imports (Tonne) Per capita consumption (kg) Fresh (kg) Processed (kg)

2015 1,400 277,000 4,930 74 372,658 34,093 172,000 26.0 9.8 16.2


Performance Indicators for selected countries (2014) Country/ Indicator

AUSTRALIA Canada

USA

Denmark

Netherlands GB

COP ($ AUS/kg

2.71

2.02

2.02

2.56

2.73

2.90

Feed ($AUS/tonne)

438

348

327

421

465

475

HFC (Kg/kg CWT)

3.68

3.90

3.94

3.65

3.72

HFC (MJDE/kg CW)

51.2

52.3

56.3

51.1

3.44 48.2

Pigs weaned/sow/y Pigs sold/sow/y

23.4

22.7

24.6

30.5

29.2

24.1

22.4

21.5

22.4

28.5

27.8

22.7

Carcass weight (kg)

78

98

97

84

92

80.5

Carcass/sow/y (kg progeny)

1747

2105

2167

2378

2565

1823

Wean-finish mortality (%)

4.0

5.5

8.9

6.6

4.8

5.9

carcass weight)

52.8


Putting industries in context –prices in 14 and 15 Country

AUSTRALIA

EU

USA

Canada

Brazil

2014

3.15 (2.71)

2.50 (2.80)

2.65 (2.02)

2.64 (2.02)

2.25 (2.12)

2015

3.35

2.10

1.93

1.80

1.80

2016

3.80

??

??

??

??

Price ($AUS/kg CW)


Major research outcomes qUnderstanding the factors affecting the welfare and performance of group housed sows qUnderstanding and enhancing the welfare of sows and piglets in lactation (in crates) qNIRS calibrations for determining the DE of grains and total and available lysine in SBM and canola meal qDisease diagnostics and antimicrobial resistance for major enteric and respiratory pathogens qImproving the eating quality of Australian pork – a challenge q First LCA on green house gas emissions from Australian pork –fascinating qSingle diet for grower-finisher pigs –I like it? qStrategies for reducing the impact of disease and immune challenge on pig performance and health


Quick update on NIRS calibrations for amino acids in soy bean meal and canola meal q Calibrations now available on line for both soy bean meal and canola meal –AusScan On Line qCalibrations can be loaded onto NIRS machines -remotely qSBM – total amino acids ,reactive lysine and SID amino acids qCanola – total amino acids and reactive lysine


Variation in lysine and reactive lysine content of SBM (1439 samples)


Variation in canola meal total and reactive lysine


In tabulated form Item

Median value

Upper value

Lower value

Soy bean meal (1430 samples) Total lysine (g/kg)

28.2

32.0

24.4

Reactive lysine (g/kg)

26.8

32.0

19.6

Reactive lysine/total lysine (%)

94.2

100

80.4

Total Lysine (g/kg)

20.6

21.9

17.0

Reactive Lysine (g/kg)

17.6

19.0

14.7

Reactive lysine/total lysine (%)

85.4

88.8

82.3

Canola meal (132 samples)


Where to Next?


Enhancing health and performance qInflammation: its cost and amelioration qRecent advances in improving feed efficiency


Inflammation –the hidden killer of efficiency qTwo recent studies Ø Use of a cortisol agonist ØSulphur amino acids and Tryptophan levels for E coli challenged pigs qSome practical strategies


Effects of administering a cortisol agonist on weaner pig performance q STUDY CO N D UC TED IN USA q THREE TREATM EN TS BETW EEN DAY 1 BEFO RE W EAN IN G AT 23 DAYS TO DAY 5 PO ST W EAN IN G - W EIGHT AT W EAN IN G 5.8 KG Ø PIGLETS REM AIN ED O N THE SOW Ø PIGLETS IN JEC TED W ITH SALIN E AT DAYS -1 AN D DAY 3 Ø PIGLETS IN JEC TED W ITH D EXAM ETHASO N E (D EX), A CO RTISO L AGO N IST (CA) -0.2 M G/KG BW


Effects on Villus height (um-duodenum)


Effects on live weight at day 5


Effects on feed conversion ratio


Effects on haptoglobin at day 5


Effects on Interleukin 1 Beta


Effects of Sulphur amino acid and Tryptophan levels on the performance and inflammation in E coli challenged pigs q STUDY INVOLVING PIGS WEANED AT 23 DAYS OF AGE q PIGLETS CHALLENGED WITH ETEC AT DAYS 5,6 AND 7 q PERFORMANCE ASSESSED OVER 14 DAYS q ACUTE PHASE PROTEIN INDEX DEVELOPED BASED ON BLOOD MEASURES AT DAYS 5 ,8 AND 14 q TREATMENTS Ø TRYPTOPHAN:LYSINE RATIOS 0.16 AND 0.24 Ø SAA:LYSINE RATIOS 0.52 AND 0.60 q ADDITIONAL DIETARY TRP AND (OR) SAA WOULD IMPROVE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND AMELIORATE INDICATORS OF INFLAMMATION IN WEANER PIGS EXPERIMENTALLY INFECTED WITH ESCHERICHIA COLI.


Effects on feed conversion ratio


Effects on Acute Phase Protein Index


Results with grower pigs q Pigs starting at 65 kg qControl qChallenged with LPS (injected) qFour SAA:Lysine ratios –achieved using Methionine Ø0.45 Ø0.55 Ø0.65 Ø0.75


Effects on growth rate and carcass weight Growth Rate (g/d)

Carcass weight Control

Control LPS

1200 1100

68

1000

66

900

64

65.5 64

60

700

58

600

56

500

54

400

52

300

64.6 64.5 62.8

61.3

62

800

LPS

59 56

50 0.45

0.55

0.65

SAA:Lysine ratio

0.75

0.45

0.55

0.65

SAA:Lysine ratio

0.75


Technologies available q Higher Vitamin E levels after weaning

qAspirin qHigher Sulphur amino acid levels (Methionine) –all stages of production.


Improving finisher pig feed efficiency qFinisher pigs use 45%-55% of total feed from weaning to sale qGrowth rate is relatively easy to manipulate qThere has been little progress in improving feed efficiency over the last 10 years – beyond PST and Ractopamine (and genetics) qThere may be a glimmer of hope based on recent R&D in Australia – costs to be determined


Manipulating intake in finisher pigs q ST U DY W I T H E N T I R E M A L ES A N D I M M U N O C A ST R AT ES Ø STA RT I N G W E I G H T - 7 5 KG Ø D U R AT I O N - 2 8 DAY S Ø S EC O N D I M P RO VA C VA C C I N AT I O N G I V E N AT STA RT O F E X P E R I M E N T q T R EAT M E N T S Ø C O N T RO L – C O N V E N T I O N A L D I E T Ø 3 % C A LC I U M C H LO R I D E D I - H Y D R AT E , 1 . 6 % S O D I U M T R I P O LY P H O S P H AT E – SA LT S Ø LU P I N A L B U S - 3 0 % F O R DAY 0 - 7 , 1 5 % D 7 - 1 4 A N D 2 0 % F O R D 1 5 - 2 8


Effects on feed intake 0-28 days P<0.001

Moore 2016


Effects on growth rate 0-28 days P<0.001


Effects on feed conversion ratio 0-28 days P=0.001


Effects on carcass weight


Effects on P2 (carcass weight used as a covariate) P=0.005


Suppressing Feed Intake in finisher Pigs q IN D IVID UALLY HO USED FEM ALE PIGS q STARTIN G W EIGHT -76 KG q D URATIO N -21 DAYS q FO UR TREATM EN TS Ø CO N TRO L –CO N VEN TIO N AL D IET Ø CO N TRO L PLUS 4% CA CL2+2.2% N A5P3O 10 (SALTS) Ø 120 M G/KG CHEN O D EXYCHO LIC ACID (CD CA - TO P D RESSED ) Ø 5% LAURIC ACID


Results Treatment

Control

Salts

CDCA

LA

Significance

Final weight (kg)

93.8

89.8

94.9

93.4

0.039

Feed intake (kg/d) 3.56

3.01

3.37

3.20

0.007

Daily gain (kg)

1.28

1.09

1.33

1.26

0.039

FCR (kg/kg)

2.81

2.81

2.52

2.55

0.023

Pluske etal 2015


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.