Part for authors and Editorial Board: ARTICLE TITLE: __Predicting user acceptance of an entreprenurship e-training user platform:_Evidence from Tunisia_______________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE RATING: Worst
Poor
Fair
Good
Better
Best
< 15%
15-30%
30-45%X
45-60%
60-75%
> 75%
Not specified
Guessable
Ambiguous X
Understanda ble
Clearly stated
Well formulated
Has it been clearly stated why the issue addressed in the paper is important?
Not at all
Hypothetica lly
Anecdotally
Based on literature X
Do the authors succeed in addressing the identified question or problem?
Not at all
Partially
Roughly X
Clearly
Is there anything new in this work either generally or in the context of a specific topic? (Novelty)
None
Slight X variation
Useful variation
Significant progress
Different approach
Completely new
None
Partial
Fair X
Good but in form of list
Good and well integrated
Good, well integrated and insightful
None
Low
Fair
Good
Fully
Lacking
Hard to follow
Well structured
Excellent
Outstanding
Very confused
Lacks clarity
PartialX Some parts hard to X follow Mainly clear X
Clear
Excellent
Outstanding
Unsatisfactory
Many X mistakes
Some mistakes
Good
Excellent
Outstanding
What percentage of economists will this be of interest to? (topicality) Have the authors clearly identified a research question or problem they want to address?
Do the authors demonstrate an understanding of work done in the field or should they read more? (References & literature) How relevant is this work for the journal Is the overall structure of the paper good? How clear is the language and exposition? Is the paper polished, rough in parts or badly in need of editing? (Presentation including grammar, spelling and layout)
Based on literature and theory With insight
Based on literature, theory and evidence Outstandingly
SUMMARY REVIEW (required - not more than 200 words): The research text tries to assess the acceptance of e-learning in entrepreneurship for Tunisia; 216 survey responses from different Tunisian regions are tested by a set of 10 hypotheses in multiple linear regression. The reliability of the psychometric testing model was checked by Cronbachâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s alpha. Using a new learning technology for entrepreneurship education seems to depend on the learnerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s willingness to share and the behavioural intent, in adaptive terms. A next study is already designed to focus on the content of new training media.
REVIEW IN FREE FORM: The research text contains a lot of interesting information, but the pieces are unfortunately not well connected. It is not possible to find the mentioned relationship of unemployment and entrepreneurship programs. Some decisive questions are missing: Could blended learning be better? The maths of the article may be elegant, but the research logic does not capture the core problem of this Tunisian e-learning-platform: How can the country educate much needed future entrepreneurs? What is the best educational practice or pathway?
SUGGESTIONS AND IDEAS FOR AUTHORS TO IMPROVE OR EXTEND THEIR WORK: Correction of all mistakes. Rethinking the composition (structure) of the article. More readability, also optical upgrading. This is a hot topic, served as a cold dish, in the end; keep it warm, at least. The whole grammar needs more clarity, coming to the point of investigation (best practice orientation).