Jereth SeneSe Selected.
P1
FAlSe liberAtion. Fall 2011
3
hAnd rePreSentAtion. Fall 2011
11
toruS houSe rePreSentAtion. SPring 2012
15
torntunnel. SPring 2012
21
houSe For cAlder. Fall 2012
31
kodAchrome librAry. SPring 2013
37
the dormitory. Fall 2013
49
Jereth SeneSe Selected.
Jereth Senese jerethsenese@gmail.com 626. 826. 6092
Pratt institute School of architecture 2011. 2012. 2013. 2014. Jereth SeneSe. Selected Architecture + Art.
P3
FAlSe liberAtion Fall. 2011
FAlSe liberAtion. FAll 2011
unique.
Human Interaction
P5
develoPment
FAlSe liberAtion. FAll 2011
The Black and White Composition
P7
FAlSe liberAtion. FAll 2011
P9
into the croSSing. 2011
P 11
hAnd rePreSentAtion Fall. 2011
hAnd rePreSentAtion. FAll 2011
P 13
hAnd rePreSentAtion. FAll 2011
the toruS houSe After completing drawings of the original Torus House, we took plans, elevations, and sections, and transformed them into new compositions that expanded on the concept of the Torus, using it as context, while at the same time giving it a new identity. I sought To expand the rolse of the torus of the house, and so I created several Mandala like forms, that stressed the relationship of different objects and their relationship to the center of the house. This created spatial diagrams that physically demonstrated the power the torus has on the structure.
P 15
the toruS houSe. SPring 2012
toruS, reconFigured
P 17
the toruS houSe. SPring 2012
P 19
nAture And mAn. 2010
P 21
torntunnel SPring. 2011
torntunnel. SPring 2012
the PAth I saw light piercing two dark, and damp objects, both perched high above the landscape. Hovering and open, but completely enclosed, I could only explain it as the “torntunnel” This space would grow and change from initial concept into a fully functioning lab space, with the requirements of having a launchpad, water features, and the ability to frame the landscape. The linear development of the structure has been punctuated and shifted through poetry workshops and this class which have shifted my thinking and ideas about the project and have caused me to emphasize new aspects. To begin to talk about my ‘the bridge’. ‘The bridge’ spans two land formations in my model and crosses above a gorge in the landscape. This element is the one true remnant of my foundation for which the rest of the structure is connected to. The walkway itself parallels a natural version of this walkway that exists on the adjacent mountain. From this natural path one can see the walkway and relate himself to that walkway, as the experiences are very similar. The two paths have a dialogue with one another, and they each are made stronger by the others presence. The bridge acts as a truss from which the two ‘pods’ of occupation extend out from. These two pods intersect the bridge only 8 feet from the walkway. While most of the span features a twenty foot high ceiling, in this moment in the middle the scale is cut in half, and the participant can run his hand along the bottom of the structure. By bringing the structure down to the hight of man, we are literally framing the human body, while visually intersecting his mode of movement, the walkway. We can compare this interruption to Walter Benjamin’s Paris: Capital of the Nineteenth Century, where we see the uninterrupted arcades as the mode of transgression and the future of modern society. If we look at my walkway as an arcade, which instead of framing the street and the store, is instead framing the landscape and this great gorge, we see that where the arcade is broken, more dynamic space is created. With this project we are turning that repetition of the arcade against itself, and turning the broken portion of the arcade into something greater. When we look at how these two large structures move out from this walkway, we see them torque in two different ways, the north tube angles up and further north to acknowledge a nearby mountain range, while the south tube turns down and further south to acknowledge a low point in the landscape, as well as the sunrise. When I began this project I envisioned these two tubes broken by a long void, creating negative space within and through the positive. This long allows light to enter the structure, and at a certain time of the day, light will shoot down this walkway, through the structure, and onto the ground below. The walkway’s third purpose is to bring people into the structure through these tiered steps, from the north side as its base, to the south level, allowing the user to enter the program space. From there however, he can rise further through the structure. As he moves up the tiered steps, his relationship in the structure changes, and he can see himself changing in perspective in relation to the structure.
P 23
torntunnel. SPring 2012
P 25
the space between the two structures, then rising above them, and for a moment you are at a level with the roof of the structure, and you can touch this roof and be on a plane with a level that you would not normally occupy. This series of events and sequences are all designed. however. with the own requirements which have cast positive repercussions and decision onto the structure. As a lab space we can most quickly think of this square footage as a box to be placed somewhere in the site. With torntunnel the goal was to remove that program space from the neutral, and charge each space which mentioned earlier has two torqued elements to acknowledge the mountains and the sunrise, we see that these become the focal point for our main spaces of occupying. The element that torques up is sloped, so scientists are in a sense translating that experience of the mountain into the structure, as if a small portion has been contained in the structure. With the opposite torque, that angles down towards the sunrise and water, the stress is relieved. And the slope is instead treated as a series of steps and an amphitheater, a place to stop, sit, watch the sunrise, or eat breakfast. This space, the last to be reached upon entering the structure, recalls concepts brought forth by Michael de Certeau’s The Poetics of Space, which posts the relationship of the intimate above the grand and unscalable. Certeau describes this relationship as centered around the house or the intimate, and as a series of images that becomes the archetype for all houses to follow. The aim of this structure is to physically frame views of the landscape, and so in a very literal way those images are being imposed into the participant’s mind in a direct way. More subversive however are the moments of memory which play into effect, where the user is able to recall moments of being in different places of the landscape. The program space, the two tubes of occupation are a grounding motion, you occupy them during one part of the day at a time. Lavish shadows cast upon its interiors but you do not notice its change. Instead, the lab space is a theatre, from which to view memories of your past movements. From it the participant can view all corners of the site from a new perspective, causing the user to rethink his relationship to that part of the site The two walkways however act as measures of time. As you move through them you move through memories of light and shadow. The participant’s physical location changes in relation to the structure, and at those moments where there is intersection, views tie the current experience to past memories. Where the ramp cuts through the south tube, only your feet are visible to those in the lab, causing you to recall site. The blank walls on the north sides of both tubesbegin at the roof from the ground to your chin. This view causes you to look down in the structure and look back down onto the water and landscape below. It is here where you recall entering the site, spending time under the shade of the structure or gathering water. Your perception is channeled, like the light in a tunnel, with the light not illuminating the way out, but the way in.
torntunnel. SPring 2012
P 27
torntunnel. SPring 2012
P 29
deco. 2010 dAllAS. 2011
houSe For cAlder. homAge to cAlder. Fall. 2012
P 31
House For Calder. Fall 2012
A houSe For AlexAnder cAlder
P 33
houSe For cAlder. FAll 2012
P 35
houSe For cAlder. FAll 2012
P 37
the kodAchrome librAry SPring. 2013
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
mASS, texture
P 39
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
obSeSSiogrAPhic context
KEN HING
FOOD MARKET INC.
HUA DU DUMPLING SHOP INC
SIEU THAI VIET NAM
P 41
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
the ProPoSAl
Basement
Ground Floor
2nd Floor
3rd Floor
P 43
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
P 45
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
KODACHROME STORAGE IMAGE VIEWING OFFICE SPACE THEATRE
P 47
chinAtoWn librAry. SPring 2013
the dormitory Fall. 2013
P 49
the dormitory. FAll 2013
P 51 E
FE
CA
E
S
AC
RR
TE
ES
CC
DA
AR
TY
AC
SP
ION
AT
ING
LIV
UL
LIC
UB
&P
UR
CO
CE
AN
TR
EN
IRC
LC
ICA
RT
VE
EN
CH
KIT AL
UN
MM
CO
RE
AT
ITS
UN HE
R/T
BA
RY
LLE
GA
PE
ST RIA N
CO M
MU
VE
ME
NT
NT
ME
KIT CH EN YA RD
UN ITS NA LS PA CE
MO
VE
ITS
UN
NA LS PA CE
MO
MU
ST RIA N
DE
DE
PE
CO M
YA RD KIT CH EN
SITE MAP + EXTERIOR CIRCULATION
1/128” = 1’ N
PROGRAMMATIC SECTIONAL DIAGRAM
An extenSion oF the Street AUTOMOBILE MOVEMENT
BICYCLE MOVEMENT
PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT
PUBLIC CIRCULATION
PRATT CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION DIAGRAM circulAtion
the dormitory. FAll 2013
GALLERY
SCULPTURE GARDEN
+0'
-4'
R 16 P U +0'
1 UP6R
1 UP6R
CAFE
SECURITY LOUNGE
the entrAnce, intertWining the Public
P 53
+0'
R 16 WN DO
GYM
+11' 16R DOWN
14R UP
16R DOWN
+0' +11'
+0'
the dormitory. FAll 2013
tyPicAl reSidentiAl FloorS
FC
FC
FC
FC
15R UP
FC
FC
FC
FC
15R UP
DSP.
DSP. D 15R
15R UP FC FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
+4'
FC FC
FC
D 9R
D 9R
KX
GWS
GWR
DHW
DCW
GXR
GXS
OA
KX
FC
+4'
FC
U 15R
15R UP
15R UP
FC
15R UP KX
GWS
GWR
DHW
DCW
GXR
GXS
OA
KX
+0'
+0'
U 9R
U 9R
D 9R
D 9R
-2'
-2' +0'
+0' EDO CTSE
+2' EDO CTSE
EDO CTSE
EDO CTSE
+2'
GWS
GWS
GWR
DHW
DCW
GXR
GXS
OA
KX
GWR
DHW
DCW
GXR
GXS
OA
KX
KX
KX
UP 15R
UP 15R
FC FC
SERV.
FC FC
FC FC
JANIT. CLST.
FC FC
15R UP
15R UP
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
UP 15R
UP 15R
15R UP
P 55
15R UP
FC
FC
FC
FC
the dormitory. FAll 2013
P 57
OA
DCW
DHW
TX
The UniT
GWR
FC GXS
MODELNUMBER TRADENAME PRODUCT MATERIAL
V-STACK
S-STACK
GWS
GXR
FC
15R UP
The DormiTory. Fall 2013
ELEV +60'
EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF VEGETATION ROOF SLAB
CORTEN STEEL PANELS 4' x10' x 1/8" DEPTH W/GRADIENT APERTURES
GLASS CURTAIN WALL CORTEN STEEL SCREEN 1/8" ON SLIDING TRACK
ELEV +49'
STEEL SUBSTRUCTURE FOR CORTEN PANELS
PLAN DETAIL
AIR/ MAINTENANCE GAP W/GRATED WALKWAY
INTERIOR CORTEN SCREEN CURTAIN WALL STEEL SUBSTRUCTURE ELEV +39'
GRATED WALKWAY
EXTERIOR CORTEN SCREEN
ELEV +29'
ELEV +19'
‘moire anD The Fire escape’
P 59
ELEV +60' 2'
9.0'
ELEV +49' 1'
12" CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB
DOUBLE PANED CURTAIN WALL
9.0' 9.0'
KINETIC WOOD PANEL SCREEN (OPEN)
HAND RAILING (GLASS)
ELEV +39' 1'
KINETIC WOOD PANEL SCREEN (CLOSED) GALVANIZED STEEL STEPS (GRATED)
BLACK PAINTED STEEL 1/8" W/DRIP + LIGHTING SPACE
9.0' STEEL TENSION CABLE 2"
ELEV +29'
GALVANIZED STEEL GRATING
1'
9.0'
ELEV +19' 1'
The DormiTory. Fall 2013