Draft Work Plan for Community WOW Steering Committee (Specific dates for monthly meetings TBD locally) Meeting Date 1.
2.
Topic a) Affirmation of Guiding Principles
Homework/Advance Prep/Materials Review draft guiding principles
b) Begin discussion About Outcomes
Review draft outcomes 1 (SMART/HARD goals)
a) Affirmation of Outcomes b) Work arenas for achieving Outcomes
Committee members submit emendations in advance via email/shared Google doc (depending on comfort of members) Review finalized Guiding Principles and Outcomes CA: Map summit ideas into Outcomes list for working draft of work arenas
Suggested Activity/MO Employ an activity such as those described in the link below to achieve group consensus about guiding principles and outcomes for Community WOW
Meeting Outcomes/ Deliverables a) Guiding Principles of Community WOW
4.
Achieving Consensus About st Promising “1 Arenas” for Achieving Outcomes
Working Group Check-In
JESNA + CA Director & Chairs: identify possible options to present anticipate directions that st group will go re 1 arenas. Create guiding materials & rubrics for working groups
Working groups conduct research
Circulate documents for Steering Committee approval
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatr s/profdevl/pd2reach.htm
Review Principles and Outcomes for final approval Work groups review 3 outcomes each to modify and expand summit lists of how to achieve Outcomes
a) Clear articulation of Community WOW Outcomes b) Increased knowledge and awareness of Steering Committee members re options
Develop and communicate guiding principles & outcomes to stakeholders/broader community JESNA and local CA create webinar to guide work groups to nonprogrammatic based ideas achieve their Outcomes Working groups develop lists for achieving Outcomes
Presentation by CA Director and/or JESNA staff of options and innovations that community may wish to explore to illustrate options and different approaches
d) Increased knowledge and awareness of Steering Committee members re options
Committee achieve consensus on +/- 3 areas they wish to explore and divide into work groups
e) Decision re 1 arenas for exploration and action
st
f)
Presentations from working groups about what they are learning Clarifying questions and suggestions about additional necessary info from other groups
1
Wordsmith documents by sub-committee
b) Draft of Achievable Outcomes
c) Organization into working groups
3.
Follow-up
SMART – specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, timely; HARD – heartfelt, animated, required difficult)
Organization into working groups
g) Orientation re how working groups will work Cross pollination of information
Communication plan: ensure voices of stakeholders (traditional institutions and CONSUMERS) in feedback and buy-in to plans; keep potential funders (including Federation, Foundation, private funders) in loop JESNA and CA Director create materials and guide coach/direct working groups to resources and individuals to research promising approaches to achieve their goals Working groups collect information on promising approaches JESNA and CA Director help working groups use decision-making tools and rubrics to develop recommendations to the Steering Committee Communication plan: ensure voices of stakeholders (traditional institutions and CONSUMERS) in feedback and buy-in to plans; keep potential funders (including Federation, Foundation, private funders) in loop Working groups use feedback to guide additional research and development of recommendations/proposals to Steering Group Communication plan: (See Above)
Draft Work Plan for Community WOW Steering Committee (Specific dates for monthly meetings TBD locally)
Meeting Date 5.
Topic Working Groups presentations of recommendations/ proposals
Homework/Advance Prep/Materials Working groups develop recommendations
Suggested Activity/MO Presentations from working groups of recommendations Clarifying questions and suggestions about additional necessary info from other groups
6.
Decision-making re overall plan for Columbus WOW
Creation of “logic models” to align goals, activities and needed inputs for each proposed initiative
Employ an activity such as those described in the link below to achieve group consensus overall plan for Community WOWs WOW http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs /profdevl/pd2reach.htm
7.
Consensus re lowhanging fruit
Creation of “logic models” to align goals, activities and needed inputs for each proposed initiative
Employ an activity such as those described in the link below to achieve group consensus about “low hanging fruit” for Community WOWWOW that will not only be beneficial, but lead to big picture of transformative change http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs /profdevl/pd2reach.htm
Meeting Outcomes/ Deliverables Familiarization of Steering Committee with breadth of research, and creating foundation for decision-making Preliminary discussion of prioritization Consensus re overall plan for Community WOW
Consensus re low hanging fruit for Community WOW
Follow-up Develop and circulate prioritization and decision-making criteria Communication plan - ensure voices of stakeholders (traditional institutions and CONSUMERS) in feedback and buy-in to plans; keep potential funders (including Federation, Foundation, private funders) in loop
Developing funding proposal for Foundation/Federation
Developing funding proposal for Foundation/Federation Communication plan - ensure voices of stakeholders (traditional institutions and CONSUMERS) in feedback and buy-in to plans; keep potential funders (including Federation, Foundation, private funders) in loop Implementation plan to be developed by staff