F O R R E S T
B I B E A U
S E L E C T E D
W O R K S
(cover) Facade concept for US Embassy, Guatemala
2
CONTENTS PROFESSIONAL / BUILT
San Juan Island Retreat Capitol Hill Revitalization
4-7 8-11
Adobe Seattle - Office TI
12-17
Sharon Fieldhouse
18-23
Securities Building Repositioning
24-27
1150 Eastlake
28-31
US Consulate - Guadalajara
32-49
US Embassy - Guatemala City
40-45
PERSONAL
Viewing Vessel Cabin
46-49
ACADEMIC
Undergraduate Thesis: Constructing the Gestalt
50-63
Visualization
64-69
Photography
70 - 75
Brand Development
76 - 77
MISCELLANEOUS
3
SAN JUAN ISLAND RETREAT BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS 2021 Sitting atop a west facing property near Cattle Point on San Juan Island, this home was designed for a couple who were looking to create an investment (rental) property which contained an attached apartment for their use. At some point the home would be fully turned over to the owners and the rental portion of the home would accommodate visiting friends and family. Design for the house began by researching zoning and permitting restrictions on the island to help the owner’s make decisions on topics such as: phased construction and building an attached vs. detached accessory dwelling unit. The design became increasingly informed by programmatic relations, access to the apartment and views from the site to the ocean. The resulting house is a clear expression of its critical components and unique program which creates dynamic roof forms while also respecting the scale of the neighboring houses. Personal Contributions: Zoning Research, site analysis, precedent research, concept design, massing studies. (right) Sketches visualizing program adjacencies by floor and initial thoughts on how to approach the site.
4
San Juan Island
Friday Harbor
Project Site
5
Mapping Scenarios 1
These diagrams were generated early in the design process to aid the clients in visualizing several scenarios for building their home: 1.
House + Garage + ADU: All three major components are connected and built as one structure.
2.
(House + Garage) + ADU: The main residence and garage are constructed first while an ADU could be constructed at a later date. The ADU’s roof would have to connect to the main residence.
2
3. House + (Garage + ADU): A small ADU would be constructed first but permitted as a residence. The main home would be completed at a later date on the condition that the new roof connects to the ADU/Garage. 4.
3
(House + ADU) + Garage: A more traditional scenario in which the house and ADU are constructed and permitted together.
4
After reviewing the diagrams the clients decided to not move forward with the ADU but instead construct an “apartment” which would be separate from the first floor.
N
SUMMER
SOLSTICE
AM
House - Main Level House - Upper Level ADU (Optional) Garage
LIG
HT
PM
HO
US
EL
AN
E
AM ICE OLST TER S
WIN
PM
6
Second Floor 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
14
Entry Kitchen Living Room Dining Room Primary Suite Bedroom Bathroom Utility/Laundry Lockable access to apartment Garage Patio Parking space for apartment Apartment suite Exterior deck
DN
13
DN
First Floor 11
5
4
3
UP
W/D
2
1
UP
8
W/D
7
6
9
12 10
7
CAPITOL HILL REVITALIZATION BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS 2021 Located in a historic residential neighborhood in north Capitol Hill, this project attempts to reconfigure an existing home to fit the growing needs of the client and acknowledge its relationship to neighboring houses. On the outside the existing house is an eclectic blend of details and additions while the interior offers poor connections between rooms, congested circulation and limited privacy for the owners. After surveying the existing house and working towards a program, two design problems needed to be addressed: How can the first floor be adapted for modern living by connecting high-use spaces? How can a third floor be added to the house while still remaining in-scale with the existing house and neighboring properties? The resulting design opens up the first floor to create much needed sight-lines, introduces a new staircase which also brings more daylight into the home, and tucks a third floor under a familiar hip-roof form with several dormers that break up the overall scale of the addition. Personal Contributions: Concept design, schematic design, outline specifications, generated pricing set drawings, conducted numerous interior and exterior design studies.
8
(above) Exterior view of proposed addition from the street (left) Interior view from living room looking into kitchen and dining room beyond (opposite page) Composite of first floor sketches looking at ways to rationalize circulation, sightlines and entry sequence.
9
Image by others
Existing house. Proposed addition + renovation
10
New Construction Demolished Construction Existing Construction to Remain
Third Floor Addition
Second Floor Renovation
First Floor Renovation 11
ADOBE SEATTLE—OFFICE TI GENSLER 2018 - 2021 Adobe’s Seattle office was established early in the company’s lifetime and needed an update to realign itself with the company’s global workplace goals. The existing building featured limited amenity areas due to a majority of its space being allocated to individual, private offices. The company had goals to triple the capacity of the building which necessitated a switch to an open-office environment. The design team worked carefully with local client representatives and Adobe’s global workplace directors to incorporate company standards, ease the transition into an open office and preserve the established office culture. The primary device for this change is named the “Trail”. Inspired by the meandering Burke-Gilman trail which can be seen from the building, the office is organized around a seemingly random path the carves its way through the workplace. The path is the result of an arrangement of standard-sized collaboration rooms which turns a typical, banal office corridor into a unique space which encourages random interactions with coworkers. At the ends of the “Trail” one will find breakrooms, amenity spaces and views out and across Lake Union. Personal Contributions: Concept design, workplace planning, consultant coordination, construction document production, construction administration.
Typical office space plan
Shape collaboration spaces to enliven main circulation paths
Place shared amenities at end of circulation to capitalize on views and encourage movement 12
rke
-G
ilm
an
Lake Union
Planning Principles The “Trail” rethinks a typical approach to workplace planning in the existing U-shaped building. Adobe has well-established sizes for collaboration spaces which the project utilizes to weave circulation towards and away from the building perimeter. The result is more variation in the types of meetings rooms and long office corridors are broken down to a more comfortable scale. On the other side of the “Trail” the workplace is separated into “neighborhoods” which house different departments and groups. These “neighborhoods” are flanked by smaller conference and focus rooms to support employees. This planning strategy helps keep the open office to a comfortable scale and address concerns from the existing office population. At the ends of the “Trail” and near the building’s cores are a variety of destinations ranging from breakrooms, a music room, game rooms and maker-spaces that provide inspiring, alternative collaboration spaces for the employees.
14
Tra il
Aurora Bridge
Fremont Bridge
Bu
Open-office collaboration spaces
Neighborhood
Neighborhood Support Spaces
“Trail”
Breakroom
15
16
Color and Wayfinding Due to the deep and wide floorplates of the existing building, the design team utilized color across the project to orient oneself along the trail and throughout the building. The design team worked closely with the client to implement color in a variety of ways and celebrate the influence Adobe has on how we understand color today. Three colors were chosen that define the east, west and central legs of the building. Color manifests itself in a variety of ways: from custom-colored grout in tile-work, carpet patterns, tinted glazing and millwork details.
17
SHARON FIELDHOUSE design/buildLAB 2013 - 2014
--
Honor Award for Excellence in Architecture
--
People’s Choice, A+ Student Award
--
Blue Ridge AIA AZ Awards 2015
American-Architects Building of the Year 2016
Restroom
The Sharon Fieldhouse sits on a hillside defined by a series of terraced baseball fields. It marks the land as a linear incision that cuts across the site and serves as a primary axis of pedestrian circulation. The building is fissured into three elements to allow the site’s circulation to weave it’s way in and around the occupied spaces. The entrance to the Fieldhouse is an arrangement of massive concrete steps, serving as a playful procession and an informal gathering space. Spaces within the incision are delineated by vertical steel screens that fan-out and range in density to create varying levels of intimacy. White laminated glass bathes the interior spaces with even natural light. Nested between the concession kitchen and the restrooms, a shade pavilion slips out of line, offering a cool repose overlooking the field. The openness of the screens allows breezes to pass through as well as views to the surrounding mountains. The pavilion space steps toward the field with a series of faceted grass seating terraces, inviting spectators to sit and enjoy the game. In this rich natural landscape transparent forms and subtle details imbue the architecture with a peaceful presence, a magical atmosphere for community gatherings.
Pavilion
Personal Contribution: Design of prefabricated modules, foundation and roof connection details, structural detailing, project scheduling, structural component fabrication, material takeoffs and roof framing. (photographs by Jeff Goldberg/ESTO)
Concessions 18
design/buildLAB The design/buildLAB is a project-based experiential learning program at Virginia Tech focused on the research, development and implementation of innovative construction methods and architectural designs. A team of 16 students collaborated with the local community of Sharon, VA, engineers, craftsmen and industry specialists to realize the Sharon Fieldhouse. The design process began with individual proposals, catalyzing an iterative process in which the best ideas from each design are combined to produce six to eight revised schemes. Eventually, the studio approaches three proposals which all inform a final scheme that is developed by the entire team. As the final scheme is being developed, the team began creating a set of construction documents for the project. Material acquisition, budget, project schedule and shop drawings were completed by the team in order to create a comprehensive picture of what it will take to complete the project under the constraints of time and budget. In conjunction with this process the prefabrication of building components is conducted at the Environmental Systems Laboratory at Virginia Tech. By mid-May, the prefabricated modules were shipped to the site where students had prepared the foundations and majority of the site to begin assembling the major components of the building.
20
(Professors) Marie Zawistowski, Keith Zawistowski (Student Team) Mitch August, Forrest Bibeau, Ellie Burns, Chanel CarterHarris, Barbara Dior Kane, Mykayla Fernandes, Xiao Fu, John Iaconis, Kellen McGinley, Ryan Myers, Tom Powers, Nancy Redenius, Julia Vasquez, Molly Vaughan, Landon Williams (Photographs) Jeff Goldberg/ESTO Photographics
Initial Concept (individual proposal)
First iteration (one of eight schemes)
Second iteration (one of three schemes)
Prefabrication at Virginia Tech’s Environmental Systems Laboratory was a critical consideration in the design of the fieldhouse. The space the components were built in, as well as the allowable width on the roads to the site, directly informed design and fabrication of building components.
21
Screen/Roof Modules
Defined Spaces
Screens enclose volumes Bioretention Swale
Porch Terrace
4 2
3
1
5
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
22
Porch Concessions Pavilion Restrooms Terraces Bioretention Swale
6
1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Custom Steel End Bent: 1/2x10 Bar welded to 3/4x1-1/2 bar with 1/4x2 cap plate. Attached to LVL beam with 1/2” countersunk bolts @ 16” OC Rubber membrane on 3/4” OSB decking 2x10 Tapered joist 3/4x5 T&G Boards 1/2x8 Bar welded to 3/4x2 bar. Attached to LVL beams with 1/2” lag bolts spaced @ 16” OC 2x4 Stud wall with 7/16” exterior sheathing and painted fiber cement board finish
2
1
3
4
5 6
Roof module section
SECURITIES BUILDING REPOSITIONING GENSLER 2019- 2020 The Securities Building is a historic Landmark building located in the heart of the Seattle’s downtown retail core. The original tower was constructed in 1913, with major additions being completed in 1924 and 1947. In 1961 a parking garage was constructed and interconnected with the Securities building. This project consists of a multi-phased approach to the demolition of the 1961 parking garage to accommodate the sale of adjacent parcels for future development. The design team was also tasked with reallocation of egress paths and restrooms facilities, modifications to the historic street frontage and design of a new exterior wall adjacent to the future development. Personal Contributions: Phasing studies, consultant coordination, communication with client, permit set production, construction documentation, existing condition documentation and coordination with the general contractor for pre-construction services.
24
(right) Project phasing diagrams (below) View of Securities Building post garage demolition
Phase 1
Phase 2 Building separation line
Connections to garage maintained
Maintain connection to adjacent development’s future garage
Garage to be demolished
Infill walls to be completed prior to existing garage demolition. Maintain connection between Securities building and garage.
Phase 3
Infill existing connection to garage prior to demolition.
Phase 4
Future Development
Demolish portions of existing building (by adjacent property buyer)
Clad exposed facade on existing building in preparation for adjacent construction. 25
B
A
AN AP
2 P6A (E)
C
2 J4A
GRID N FUTURE PROPERTY LINE
1' - 3" 1' - 6"
AL
SEPARATION LINE GRID M
AK AO AJ
A1
A6 A7
A3
A9
A11
LEVEL 03
OPEN TO BELOW
LEVE L 04 179' 6"
AE AP AN AD
GARA
A
A
03 ________ ________
02 ________ ________
A04.001-P1
01 ________ ________
A04.001-P1
04 ________ ________
A04.001-P1
GE - L
A04.002-P1
B
E VEL 04 176' 6"
C
2 P6A (E)
202
2 J4A
ALIGN
AC LEVE L 03 168' 0"
AL AO
204 201
2 J2A
203
205
LEVEL 03 WOMEN'S RR
AK A6 A7
A3 GARA 05 ________ ________
GE - L
E VEL 03 162' 3"
A04.001-P1
03
2
2 B6A
01
02
4
5
8
9
EXIST. STORAGE SPACE FOR TENANTS SUITES BELOW ON 3RD AVE LEVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS.
E VEL 02 151' 0"
A6 A7
A3
OPEN ________ TO BELOW ________ (SEE LEVEL 3RD AVENUE PLAN)
A9 03 ________ ________
04 A04.001-P1
A04.001-P1
STORAGE 100
L 01.5 1403 2' - 0"
03
2 B6A
1
AC
GARA
A04.001-P1
A11
02 ________ ________ A04.001-P1
2
2 P6A (E) 2 P6A (E)
9' - 8" 100
R D AV E 138' 0" LE VE L - 3R D A VE 136' 0"
3
12
LEVEL 1.5 04 ________ ________ A04.002-P1
B
A6A
2 B6A
GE - 3
2 J6A
01 ________ ________ A04.001-P1
LE V E
A
A01.102-P1
200
GE - L
05 ________ ________
C
2 P6A (E)
3
A1
AB AE AP AN AA AD
B
CONSTRUCTION PLAN - LEVEL 03 - PHASE 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
A04.002-P1
LEVEL 02 WOMEN'S RR
2 B6A
GARA
LEVEL 02 04 ________ ________
(7) EXIST. WALL PANELS @ 39 3/4" EA.
1 AC AL
(ALT. LOCATION)
A04.001-P1
2 P6A (E)
LEVEL 02 EXISTING RESTROOMS
2 J6A
02 ________ ________
LEVE L 02 156' 0"
AD
AJ
A04.001-P1
A04.001-P1
03
2 B6A
AO AK
03 ________ ________
04 ________ ________
A11 01 ________ ________ A04.001-P1
1' - 0"
2 J2A
A
AE AP AA AN
A9
V.I.F.
A1
AJ AB
4
5
C
2 P8A (E)
LEVEL 03 EXISTING RESTROOMS
8
9
12
AL
A10.003
AO AK
CONSTRUCTION PLAN - LEVEL 02 - PHASE 1 A1
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
AB
GARA
05 ________ ________ A04.001-P1
A
2 M8A
2 P6A (E)
2
2 B3N
2 P6A (E)
12
3
20 CL-2 (ABOVE)
4
5
32
8
UP
12
9
6' - 5" STORAGE 008
003
LE VE
CONSTRUCTION PLAN - LEVEL 1.5 - PHASEL - 1B1 - BASEME
NT 112' 0"
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
C
002
1
DN
4TH AVE
AB
1 ________ ________
A04.001-P2
A04.001-P2
03
AE
3 ________ ________
2 ________ ________
A04.001-P2
NEW FOOTING BENEATH CMU WALL
A04.002-P1
B
H AVE 123' 0"
5' - 6"
01
04 ________ ________
A04.001-P1
A04.001-P1
2 J4A
AL
AJ
3RD AVE
01 ________ ________
02 ________ ________
03
10
AC
2 M8A
A04.001-P1
A04.001-P1
A11
L - 4T
001
B
03 ________ ________
04 ________ ________
TH AV E 126' 0"
LEVE
03
2 M8A
MECH. 007
AO AK
GE - 4
A9
A3A
AE AP AA AN AD
DN
A6 A7
A3
8' - 0"
01
2 J4A
AJ
03
16
5 ________ ________
4 ________ ________
B
03
A
AA AN AD
2 M8A
2 M8A
1
2
3
4
1 ________ ________
A04.001-P2
A04.001-P2
A04.002-P2
C
03
2 M8A
5
2 M8A
8
9
12
0
Communicating Complexity 1
Part of the design team’s task was to analyze existing conditions in the Securities Building and communicate phased work to a variety of stakeholders. The project was divided into four phases but needed to be viewed holistically to properly understand concerns from the client and contractor.
2 3 4
5
6 7
A series of isometric drawings were developed at critical locations along the building separation line which served multiple purposes: to identify existing conditions that required additional field verification, how new infill walls aligned to existing structural elements above, identify demolition challenges and manage client expectations for the building after garage demolition.
A.
These drawings aided in the eventual production of schematic details for a future exterior wall that would cover the newly exposed facade of the Securities Building. 5
8
9
10
1. 2. 3. 4.
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
B.
Future property line Building separation line Metal coping, painted Metal framed connection from new wall to existing structure. Insulated metal wall panel system WRB over existing structure Anodized aluminum flashing lapped over existing reglet Existing wall/structure Base extrusion and flashing Support for new exterior wall 27
1150 EASTLAKE GENSLER 2020 - 2021 Located on Lake Union’s eastern shore, 1150 Eastlake is a twelve-story, 300,000 square-foot lab and office building. The site is located adjacent to I-5 and slopes steeply from the east to west. The building maximizes the allowable FAR and steps back at the fourth story due to a shoreline setback, shifting views from the tower to northern Lake Union. The concept for the building is inspired by the abundance of nature surrounding Seattle. Vertical pipe columns at the ground and amenity floors evoke a forest-like atmosphere. Scalloped vertical metal panels organize themselves on the facade in a gradient pattern to open up views to the north and west. Personal Contributions: Rooftop redesign, construction documentation, consultant coordination, shop drawing review and curtainwall design coordination, construction administration.
Shoreline se tback
Mech.
Amenity
Support
28
Mech.
Rendering by others
A C
B
Rendering by others
1/4
LEVEL 08 149' - 0"
LEVEL 08 149' - 0"
EMBED PL 12X12X1/2 W/ (4) 3/4" DIA. X 4" STUDS @ 8" CTR ON EMBED
LEVEL 08 149' - 0"
CONCRETE SLAB, REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS
07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
07 21 00.G01 MINERAL-WOOL BOARD PL 7X7X1/2 W/ 3/4" DIA A307 BOLT IN 3"X3/16" VERT SLOTTED HOLE. HAND TIGHTEN AND PEEN THREADS
3/16"
4
REMOTE LIGHTING CONTROL GEAR AS REQUIRED, REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. CL-04 LIGHTING FIXTURE MOUNTING SUPPORT, PER MANUFACTUERS RECOMMENDED HARDWARE
NOTE ADDITIONAL CABLE AND PROPRIETARY CONNECTION SYSTEM TO POWER AND CONTROL MULTIPLE LIGHTS - SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS
1/4
PAINTED ROUND HSS6.000X0.250 TYP.
LIGHTING, REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. PAINTED ROUND HSS TUBE, 6"X0.25" TYP.
LIGHTING, REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. PAINTED CURVED CEILING SHEET METAL TRIM
PAINTED CURVED CEILING SHEET METAL TRIM
1' - 0"
1' - 4"
LIGHTING FIXTURE MOUNTING SUPPORT, PER MANUFACTUERS RECOMMENDED HARDWARE
07 21 00.G01 MINERAL-WOOL BOARD
REMOTE LIGHTING CONTROL GEAR AS REQUIRED, REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS.
CAP PL 7X7X1/4"
LIGHTING, REFER TO ELECT. DWG
07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
07 21 00.G01 MINERAL-WOOL BOARD
4
REMOTE LIGHTING CONTROL GEAR AS REQUIRED, REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS.
CONCRETE SLAB, REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS
CONCRETE SLAB,REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS
PT07
PT04
CL-04 5"
CL-04
6"
PAINTED CURVED CEILING SHEET METAL TRIM
5"
4"
PT07
6"
4"
PAINTED CURVED CEILING SHEET METAL TRIM
CL-04
PT07
PAINTED CURVED CEILING SHEET METAL TRIM PT07
4
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
C. Amenity Pipe with Halo light
07
DETAIL SECTION SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
EQ EQ
PLAN
PAINTED STEEL FLAT BAR 1-1/2" PAINTED SQUARE HSS TUBE
EQ
1/4"
STAINLESS STL. CABLE, TYP.
EQ
5' - 0" TYP.
DETAIL SECTION - AMENITY PIPE HEAD LIGHT PANEL
INTENSIVE GREEN ROOF SEE LANDSCAPE
EQ
B. Amenity Pipe with Spotlight EQ
1/2" TYP.
A. Amenity Pipe (No Light)
1 3/4"
21
1/2"
3' - 6"
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
EQ
1 3/4"
DETAIL SECTION - AMENITY PIPE HEAD DOWN LIGHT
EQ
1' - 3"
25
1/2" TYP.
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1/2"
DETAIL SECTION - AMENITY PIPE NO LIGHT
EQ
31
3/8" POWDER COATED STEEL PLANTER AND STEEL SUPPORT AT 5'-0" O.C.
EQ 3' - 6"
EQ 29 ________ ________ A5.303
EQ
1-1/2" PAINTED SQUARE HSS TUBE
EQ
DRAINAGE PANEL
HINGE
EQ
EQ
STAINLESS STL. CABLE
EQ 3' - 6"
2' - 10"
30
EQ
3' - 1"
R2A
RAILING ANCHOR TO BASE PLATE CONCRETE CURB REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS
Supporting Design Intent Careful detailing efforts were carried out during construction administration to ensure the original design intent was being executed within the constraints of time and budget. The primary amenity floor sits level with I-5 and is enclosed by a curved, custom glass wall system that diffuses noise from the freeway when out on the terrace. The floor is populated with a series of “trunks” that penetrate the drop-ceiling which contains a variety of lighting conditions.
Rooftop parti
Up on the roof, an aggregation of organic forms defines the mechanical and rooftop amenity spaces. Inspired by a river stone cairn, subtle elevation changes plus contrasting materials maintains the individual forms and gives the architecture an iconic roof penthouse which can be seen from adjacent neighborhoods.
D
Sketch of rooftop deck entryway
SELF-ADHERING HIGH TEMP UNDERLAYMENT ALUMINUM COMPOSITE WALL MATERIAL PANEL
C
TURN EDGE METAL UP AT END WALL. EXTEND UNDER COPING ABOVE
R2E
BASE SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM BY W1A MT PANEL MANUF. TWO-PIECE SHEET METAL RECEIVER WITH REMOVABLE COUNTER FLASHING 3" CONCRETE PAVER
07 14 13.A00 07 14 13 HOT FLUID APPLIED WTRPRF
LIQUID RESIN FLASHING
8"
1' - 3"
STRAPPING AT FACE OF STUD FOR TERM BAR SUPPORT AMENITY ROOF 217' - 0"
R2E
PAINTED SHEET METAL FLASHING TO MATCH ACM PANEL
R1A
CONT. CLEAT AMENITY ROOF 217' - 0"
R2E
BASE SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM BY W1A SHEET MT PANEL MANUF. TWO-PIECE METAL RECEIVER WITH REMOVABLE COUNTER FLASHING TWO-PIECE SHEET METAL RECEIVER WITH REMOVABLE COUNTER FLASHING 3" CONCRETE PAVER
R2E
SELF-ADHERING HIGH TEMP UNDERLAYMENT PAINTED METAL COPING TO MATCH ACM PANEL
CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING STRAPPING AT FACE OF STUD FOR TERM BAR SUPPORT AMENITY ROOF 217' - 0"
AMENITY ROOF 217' - 0"
07 14 13 HOT FLUID APPLIED WTRPRF
07 14 13 HOT FLUID APPLIED WTRPRF
PAINTED SHEET METAL FLASHING TO MATCH ACM PANEL
PAINTED SHEET METAL FLASHING TO MATCH ACM PANEL CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING
CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING STEEL DECK WITH SPRAY FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL, REFER TO STRUCT DWGS
STEEL DECK WITH SPRAY FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL, REFER TO STRUCT DWGS
ALUMINUM COMPOSITE WALL MATERIAL PANEL
METAL STUD FRAMING
ALUMINUM COMPOSITE WALL MATERIAL PANEL
METAL STUD FRAMING
STEEL DECK WITH SPRAY FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL, REFER TO STRUCT DWGS
SEALANT AND BACKER ROD
FLUID APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIER
1/2"
1/2"
EXTERIOR SHEATHING OVER 6" METAL STUD
EXTERIOR SHEATHING OVER 6" METAL STUD
SEALANT AND BACKER ROD
FLUID APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIER
FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIER
FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIER
BASE SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM BY MT PANEL MANUF.
BASE SHEET METAL FLASHIN AND TRIM BY MT PANEL MANU
SECTION DETAIL DETAIL - PARAPET - SOUTH@ ENTRY R2E ROOF ROOF SOFFIT 2106SECTION 16 SECTION DETAIL - NORTH ENTRY ROOF SO
SECTION DETAIL - NORTH ENTRY ROOF SOFFIT SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1 1/2" = 11'-0" 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE SCALE
D. Section - Roof Entry Soffit
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
E. Section - Roof Parapet Extension
PARTITION AS SCHEDULED
METAL COMPOSITE WALL PANELS
FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
31
1 3/8"
SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM
1/2"
STEEL DOOR FRAME
5/8"
16
2"
APET @ R2E ROOF
STEEL DECK WITH SPRAY FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL, REFER TO STRUCT DWGS
1/2"
1' - 3"
PARAPET BEYOND 3" CONCRETE PAVER
E
21 ________ ________ A5.407
8 1/4"
SELF-ADHERING HIGH TEMP UNDERLAYMENT ALUMINUM COMPOSITE WALL MATERIAL PANEL
DOOR AS SCHEDULED EXPOSED FASTENER METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM
6"
US CONSULATE—GUADALAJARA MILLER HULL 2017 - 2018 The new U.S. Consulate Compound will be built on an 8.5-acre site in the Monraz neighborhood along Guadalajara’s western border with the city of Zapopan. The multi-building campus includes a new 12,000-square-meter office building, entry pavilions, support and utility buildings, recreational areas and two 150-vehicle underground parking garages. The design team worked closely with the State Department to define a new paradigm for consular service: a second-floor consular department. Cantilevered out from the floors above and below, the glass-clad volume of the consular department provides a clear wayfinding element for visitors coming to the building for the first time. Personal Contribution: Schematic and design development presentations, conceptual design studies and visualization. Responsible for documentation and consultant coordination on parking garages, interior feature stair, main entrance lobby, visitor plaza and auxiliary site features.
(right) Overall site view (below) Visitor entry sequence
Consulate Consulate Access Point Visitor Parking Garage
32
Palapa as Civic Gesture The building is covered by the design team’s interpretation of the vernacular “palapa” shading device which not only shades the building’s facade but also provides the building a unifying civic gesture befitting its use. Individual modules on the canopy shade the southern facade and are sized to provide partial shading on the east and west. The canopy is interrupted at the rooftop terrace to allow employees access to natural daylight without leaving the secured building.
34
A. Canopy/Column connection sketch
A 3000 3000
9000
3000
(above) South facade elevation rendering (right) Canopy panelization diagram
1500
3000 4500
3000
3000
3000
9000
35
8
FAB-7
2412
WD-1 BENCH
6
7631
MAIN STAIR AXONOMETRIC - LOOKING NORTHWEST 3094
7 A432
11 TREADS @ 279
A523UP
5 A523
NOB
UP
DN NOB
NOB
3
2
NOB 3 A524
1 A524
2126
4
2
LEVEL 4 1621.27
LEVEL 4 1621.27
1703
448
1703
3855
4250 1886
AESS-2
5
CONTROL JOINT IN CONCRETE WALL BEYOND
STAIR 6 - LEVEL 2 PL 1 : 50
6
AWF-3 BETWEEN WD SLATS PNT-2
A432
5 A432
3855 1703
CONC-BF
448
1703
TERRAZZO JOINTS
6
SL-1 TREADS WITH GL-8 RISERS
2057
A523
8 A523
2017
12 RISERS @ 168
2017
12 RISERS @ 168
LEVEL 2 1610.77
6000
UP
UP
LEVEL 2 1610.77
UP
5500
2057
GL-8 GUARDRAIL SYSTEM, TYP.
12 RISERS @ 171
A523
HSS SUPPORT
6000
9 A121 A432
LEVEL 3 1616.77
11 RISERS @ 171
LEVEL 3 1616.77
12 RISERS @ 171
4500
STL HANGER RODS
4500
CONC-BF
5500
9 A523
1466
LAN
CONCRETE
10
LEVEL 1 1605.27
LEVEL 1 1605.27 6 A417 A432
A111 A432
Main Feature Stair Longitudinal STAIR 6 SECTION - LEVEL 1-3 Section
0
1 : 50
UNCLASSIFIED 9
36
10
11
STAIR 6 - LEVEL 1 PL 1 : 50
1M
2M
4M
ALL MIL DEC
1:50
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
(above) Main office stair view
37
GYP BOARD
PNT-2
MFR
25
ST-5 MT BED
87
25
87 LWC-1 LINEAR
LWC-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
LEVEL 2 1610.77 SOFFIT
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT SOFFIT
WOOD CEILING
DOWELS SPACING PER MFR SOFFIT
AD
OCS
2
416 A525
G
SS WMM ATTACHMENT PER MFR
1:5
ALIGN
BLACKENED STEEL
WARNING: This reproduction an the express wri
6% SLOPE
152
14829 AFF
10
AWP-2
U.S. Departmen ATTN: OBO POC Washington, DC
152
14829 AFF
10
OPENING FOR LIGHT FIXTURE
SS WMM SEE SPEC. DOWELS SPACING PER MFR PNT-2 BEHIND SS MESH
LCW-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
SECTION DETAIL - CONSULAR BOOTH BASE
6% SLOPE
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
DOWELS SPACING PER MFR
TYCO WS SPRINKLER HEAD EACH SIDE OF GLAZING SEE FIRE PROTECTION DOCS
148
LCW-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
148
ILING
152
152
BLACKENED STEEL WALL BASE
LCW-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
SECTION DETAIL - CONSULAR BOOTH WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE WALL
3 WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE WALL A416 A525 1 : 5
BOARDFORM CONC. WALL BEYOND BOARDFORM CONC. WALL BEYOND INTERIOR GLAZING SEE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
L-ANGLE
WALL SEE PLAN
DOWEL CLIP
WALL SEE PLAN
ST-5 FLOORING
SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM
BED CEILING GRID3SUB FRAME SECTION DETAIL - STAIRDETAIL S6 WOOD GRILLE CEILING SECTION DETAIL - STAIRDETAIL S6 CEILING TOS6 WALL 2 3 SECTION - STAIR S6 WOOD GRILLE CEILING SECTION - STAIR CEILING MTTO WALL OOR PLANS FOR
YPES 1 : 10
A132 A524
A432 A524
1 : 10
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
1 : 10
A432 A524
1 : 10
B.O. STEEL 1625.07
DOWELS PER MFR
L BETWEEN CLG AND O ACCOMMODATE LIFT-OFF FOR LATION
13
LCW-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
S PANEL ON Z CLIPS
25 STONE CLADDING MITERED @ PREFABRICATED CORNER, TYPICAL ALL LOCATIONS
152
WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE
WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE
ZCLIP HANGING SYSTEM SEE SPEC
ZCLIP HANGING SYSTEM SEE SPEC
6
A411 A524
1:5
WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH VERTICAL WOOD GRILLE OF WALL
PLAN DETAIL -PLAN LOBBY WOOD--LOBBY GRILLE 4 DETAIL WOODGrille GRILLE Plan Detail Lobby Wood Corner 1:5
SECTION DETAIL - LWC CEILING AT EXEC. SUITE
5 A412 A524
1:5
32
87
7
A417 A525
32
87
TYP.
WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH VERTICAL WOOD GRILLE OF WALL
SECTION DETAIL - RAILING 152
MDF SUBSTRATE A211 A525 AWF, REF FINISH SCHEDULE FOR TYPE
152
AWF, REF FINISH SCHEDULE FOR TYPE
1 : 10
75
DOWEL PER MFR
152
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
DOWEL PER MFR
PROVIDE 5MM REVEAL ON BACK OF WDP-1 SLATS FOR AWF
75
SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM CEILING GRID ATTACHMENT TYP.
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
TYP.
RECESSED LIGHTING SEE ELECT.
SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM CEILING GRID ATTACHMENT TYP.
PROVIDE 5MM REVEAL ON BACK OF WDP-1 SLATS FOR AWF
SECTION DETAIL - POST ONE REVEAL MDF SUBSTRATE 1:5
WALL TRACK PROFILE RECESSED LIGHTING SEE ELECT.
152
32
87
TYP. TYP.
87 32
5
EDGE OF BENCH BELOW SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
TYP.
SECTION DETAIL - WOOD GRILLE CEILING 5 SECTION DETAIL - WOOD Section Detail - Wood Grille CeilingGRILLE CEILING 1:5
BSTRATE
A412 A524
1:5
WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE WD SLEEPERS 300MM O.C.
MDF SUBSTRATE AWF-1
100
483
T.O.S. TERRACE 1616.37
T&G WD-1 FLOORING
ZCLIP HANGING SYSTEM SEE SPEC FAB-6 BENCH CUSHION SOLID WD CORNER TO MATCH WD-1
51
133
TOPPING SLAB
102
T.O.S. TERRACE 1616.37
SFF
419
STL TUBE SUPPORT. ENGINEERED FOR 150LB/FT2
SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM CEILING GRID SUB FRAME
SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM CEILING GRID SUB FRAME
DOWEL CLIP
DOWEL CLIP
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
BLACK ACOUSTIC FELT
L-ANGLE
L-ANGLE
PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE WITH WD-1 FINISH
Rev Number
ST-3 INTERIOR STONE CLADDING ASSEMBLY
267
STL PLATE ANCHORED TO WALL
D
Revision Sched
SEALANT AND BACKER ROD, TYP. REF A633 FOR FLOOR FINISH
LEVEL 1 1605.27
The Mille Archit
87
25
32
87
25
ALIGN
6
7
SLOPE GYP BULKHEAD TO MATCH LWC-1 SLOPE GYP BULKHEAD TO MATCH LWC-1
UNCLASSIFIED
ALIGN
8
9
10
1:5
A415 A524
87
32 0
TYP. TYP.
A432 A524
1:5
1:5
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 8
38
10
9
11
10
12
11
12
14
Release For Cons
160MM
MDF SUBSTRATE WDP-1 WOOD GRILLE GWB
13
A432 A524
1:5
100 MM
200 MM
1:5
13
1:5
80MM
0
100 MM
200 MM
400 MM
0
TOSUBSTRATE ZCLIP HANGING SYSTEM MDF AWF, REF TO 1:10 1:5 AWF, REF FINISH SCHEDULE SEE SPEC. FINISH SCHEDULE PROVIDE 5MM REVEAL ON FOR TYPE FOR TYPE PROVIDE CONTINUOUS 15 BACK OF WDP-1 SLATS 16 BLOCKING FOR ZCLIP FOR AWF FABRIC ATTACHMENTS
PROVIDE 5MM REVEAL ON 14 OF WDP-1 SLATS BACK FOR AWF FABRIC
200 MM
400 MM
13
0
400100 MMMM
1:10
1:5
15
14
16
0 MM 200 MM 200
15
400 MM 400 MM
0
800200 MMMM
INTER
OBO Project Num CONTINUOUS 17 PROVIDE 18 BLOCKING FOR ZCLIP
ATTACHMENTS
16
18
SAQMMA14F317
CADD File Name GDL_NOB_A_Centra
800 MM
ALL DIMENSIONS WITHOUT A DECIMAL ARE IN WITHOUT A ALL DIMENSIONS MILLIMETERS UNITS. ALL DIMENSIONS WITH UNITS. A MILLIMETERS ALL DIM DECIMAL ARE IN METERS UNITS. DECIMAL ARE IN METERS UN
1:10
17
400 MM
Drawing Title
ZCLIP HANGING SYSTEM SEE SPEC.
PLAN DETAIL -PLAN WOOD GRILLE AT STAIR 8 DETAIL - WOOD GRILLE AT STAIR 0
9
GWB
SECTION DETAIL - BENCH @ STAIR S6 OBO/PDCS/PDC
40MM
WDP-1 WOOD1:2 GRILLE
12
8
87
TYP. TYP.
11
SECTION DETAIL - CONSULAR BULKHEAD 7 SECTION DETAILCLG - CONSULAR CLG BULKHEAD
10
A411 A525
LWC-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
32
32
152
DOWELS PER MFR
LWC-1 LINEAR WOOD CEILING
CO N NS OT TR FO
152
1:5
TYP.
DOWELS PER MFR SECTION DETAIL - LOBBY BENCH
152
9 A411 A525
152
Section Detail - Lobby Bench TYP.
E
TYP. TYP.
TERIOR STONE NG ASSEMBLY
411 A525
GYPSUM BOARD
TYP.
EDGE OF BENCH BELOW SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
TYP.
TYP.
ALIGN
152
STONE CLADDING MITERED @ PREFABRICATED CORNER, TYPICAL ALL LOCATIONS
ALIGN
URSE OF ST-4 RTED FROM M AND SIDES
17
19
18
20
19
(above) Main entry lobby view
39
US EMBASSY—GUATEMALA CITY MILLER HULL 2016 - 2017 The new US Embassy compound is 4 kilometers southeast of the Guatemala City’s historic center. The design is comprised of an 18,800-square meter chancery building, Marine Security Guard Residence, support buildings and below-grade garage for 500 vehicles. To stabilize the extreme topography, a language of terracing was introduced as the basic site organization. Building from the site conditions, the office building emerges from the ground plane as two complementary bars – a stone base and a glass tower. The base reflects an earthbound quality through its materiality and its relationship to the terracing of the site. The tower is characterized by openness and transparency, offering an ethereal counterpoint to the structure of the site. Personal Contribution: Developed exterior building canopies, detailed site elements, produced design development drawings for office and maintenance buildings. Assisted with project conceptual development, facade design studies, presentation models, study models, presentation graphics, and renderings.
40
41
A
C
B
UNCLASSIFIED 2480
12
2
A452 A454
14
15
16
1
3785
1
2
3
SECTION @ CONSULAR CANOPY GIRDER CONNECTION LEVEL 6 1 : 10
TO END OF HSS SECTION @ CONSULAR CANOPY PV ARRAY 4 5 6 7
3 A452 A454
1 : 10
P GL-7 PANEL F66WITHIN PV FRAME
PV ARRAY PV ARRAY SUPPORT 1%
1%
AESS BAR WELDED AND SEALED; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY SUPPORT
LEVEL 5 1503.50
7
CONCEALED A451 SLEAVED RAIN LEADER THRU BEAM. REF. PLUMB DWGS FOR DOWNSPOUT LOCATION IN WALL MTL GUTTER SLOPED TO DRAIN INS-2, R8 50MM SEMIRIGID INSULATION BUILT-UP PLATE SUPPORT FOR CMP METAL PANEL ON GUTTER TO MATCH FC-3 CLIP ASSEMBLY AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE JOIST TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT. DWGSTHERMAL CLIP W/ CONTINUOUS VERTICAL GALVANIZED SUBGIRT
F37 F66
N
PV ARRAY SUPPORT STL PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 300mm OC
U.S. Department of State ATTN: Mona Kuntz, Consular For Management Affairs Washington, DC 20520
MTL RAIN LEADER
ALIGN
1. CANOPY, SCREEN WALL AND CATWALK FRAMING SIZES AND CONNECTIONS SHOWN IN BRIDGING DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INTENT ONLY.
M
RFP BRIDG
2. FINAL DESIGN OF FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTIONS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR.
GL-2A, FE/BR GLAZING, GL-1A AT SIM
AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCTURAL DWGS.
LEVEL 4 1497.50
SECTION AT MAIN ENTRY CANOPY
LEVEL 4 1497.50
L
3
1 : 50
A313 A451
4. ALL EXPOSED METAL SURFACES TO RECEIVE HIGH PERFORMANCE COATING.
MAIN ENTRY CANOPY AT CANTILEVER
Rev Number Description 5. MAIN ENTRY CANOPY AESS DETAILING TO BE CATEGORY 1; REF. Revisions SPEC.
1 : 50
NOB
1
GL-5 VERTICAL GLASS FIN
J GL-7; SLOPED TO DRAIN
Release For Construction: OBO/PDCS/PDC
GL-3 SPANDREL GLASS CLADDING ON CLIPS
SECTION @ CONSULAR CANOPY GUTTER 200MM X 120MM (MINIMUM)
1
GALVANIZED MTL RECTANGULAR RAIN LEADER TO MATCH FC-3
A454
I
5 SECTION @ CONSULAR CANOPY BEAM CONNECTION NOB CONSULAR CANOPY DETAIL - AXON A452 A454 1 : 10 0
CMP-1 METAL PANEL (FC-1)
2
4 UNCLASSIFIED
3
7
8
9
5
6
10
7
8
9
AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT TO MATCH FC-3; 12 13 REF STRUCT. DWGS
14
EXTEND HSS BACK TO EMBED PLATE FOR FULLY WELDED CONNECTION
G
A451
H
MAIN ENTRY CANOPY GUTTER DIAGRAM
6 A203 A451
N.T.S.
F
23
16
17
NOB
18
1
7000
1 : 10
9 A451
GL-7
RFP BRIDGING
1%
F4
1%
Rev Number
F37
1%
88
D
PL8 ES PLUG WELDED TO HSS TUBE
ALUMINUM CHANNEL SECURED TO JOIST; TO MATCH FC-3
1%
LEVEL 4 1497.50
C
1 MAIN@ENTRY SECTION 9 YA206 SECTION JOIST CANOPY MAIN ENTRY CANOPY GUTTER DETAIL A451 1 : 50 A451 A451
200MM X 120MM (MIN.) GALVANIZED MTL RECTANGULAR RAIN LEADER TO MATCH FC-3
C. Main Entry Canopy Section
B
0
UNCLASSIFIED
200 MM
400 MM
800 MM
1:10
11AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND 12
0
1M
2M
4M ALL DIMENSIONS WITHOUT A DECIMAL ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNITS. ALL DIMENSIONS WITH A DECIMAL ARE IN METERS UNITS.
1:50
13
TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT DWGS
14
15
16
17
Drawing Scale
CADD File Name GUA_NOB_A_Central_R15.rvt
CADD Plot Scale
As Indicated
Phase 15%
35%
1:1
Author
Checked By
Checker 4
ProjectA452 NumberA454
2
3
4
5
6
AESS BUILT UP PLATE7 AND TUBE
MAIN EN 100%
FINAL
1 : 50
1315.2
NOB A451
SECTION @ 1 : 10
UNCLASSIFIED 43
Classification
GL-5 VERTICAL GLASS FIN
UNCL
GL-7; SLOPED TO DRAIN
1
90%
Sheet Number
MAY 12, 2017
Drawn By
CONT. ALUM. SUPPORT ATTACHED TO PLATE STL; TO MATCH FC-3
CMP-1 SOFFIT BEYOND
60%
3
A313 A451
18
A
200MM X 120MM (MINIMUM) GALVANIZED MTL RECTANGULAR RAIN LEADER TO MATCH FC-3. REF
OBO Project Number
Date
NOB
H
OBO/PDCS/DE
MAIN ENTRY CANOPY LEVEL 4 DETAILS 1497.50 SAQMMA14F3174
SECTION ATCANOPY MAIN ENTRY CANOPY DETAIL MAIN ENTRY AT CANTILEVER
1 : 10
10
Release For Construction:
Drawing Title
2 10 A450 A451 1 : 50 A451 A451 1 : 10
B. Main Entry Canopy Gutter Detail
9
GL-7, SLOPED TO DRAIN
OBO/PDCS/PDC
FABRICATED RAIN LEADER CLEANOUT ACCESS WITH CAP; PAINTED TO MATCH FC-3
LED LIGHT FIXTURE; REF ELEC. DWGS
Date
AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCTURAL DWGS. Polson Building 71 Columbia, Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104 Phone 206.682.6837 Fax 206.682.5692
The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Architecture and Planning
200MM X 120MM (MIN.) GALVANIZED MTL RECTANGULAR RAIN LEADER TO MATCH FC-3
6000
MIN.
195
Revisions
GUTTER TO RAIN LEADER ADAPTER
PROVIDE WEEP HOLES ALONG HSS
1503.50
Description
F66BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE AESS STRUCTURAL BENT TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT. DWGS
F23
AESS BUILT UP PLATE LATERAL BRACING; TO MATCH FC-3
AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT
AESS GIRDER MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
AESS BUILT-UP ANGLE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF. LEVEL 5 STRUCTURAL DWGS
MP-1 CLAD COL.
MTL GUTTER SLOPED TO DRAIN; TO MATCH FC-3
1%
1%
HSS 457X157X12.7
UN
AESS STIFFENER PLATES PROVIDED AT COLUMN LOCATIONS; TO MATCH FC-3
7 A451
E
MIN.
8 A451
SEALANT AND BACKER ROD
1315
14
Classification
LEVEL 6 1508.00
LEVEL 5 1503.50
110
ALUMINUM CHANNEL SECURED TO JOIST; TO MATCH FC-3
Auth
Chec
Number
SECTION AT MAIN ENTRY CANOPY AND COLONNADE
ALUMINUM CHANNEL SECURED TO JOIST; TO MATCH FC-3
5MM SHIM
Project
AESS BAR WELDED AND SEALED; TO MATCH FC-3
TO END OF HSS
GL-7; SLOPED TO DRAIN
PLATE SPOT WELDED TO HSS TUBE; SEALED AND FINISHED
Checked By
AESS BUILT-UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
SEAL BETWEEN GUTTER AND CANOPY GLASS
ALIGN TO GLASS FINS ON NOB FACADE
8
15 UNCLASSIFIED
MAY 12, 2017
Drawn By
PV ARRAY SUPPORT
NOB
G
66
800 MM
35%
6000
5
10
15%
Date
STL PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ALL DIMENSIONS WITHOUT A DECIMAL ARE IN ARRAY; 1000mm OC MILLIMETERS UNITS. ALL DIMENSIONS WITH A 11 12 13 PV ARRAY DECIMAL ARE IN METERS UNITS.
2480
CMP-1 SOFFIT AND NOSING ALIGN CMP-1 SOFFIT WITH METAL-CLAD COLUMN BELOW NOB
400 MM
Phase
As Indicated SECTION @
SAQMMA14F3174 2
CADD Plot Scale CADD File Name GUA_NOB_A_Central_R15.rvt A452 A454 1 : 10 1:1
1:10
CONT. STL EMBED PLATE WITH ANCHORS ALONG RC BEAM PROVIDING WELDED CONNECTION POINT TO CANOPY
H 11
200 MM
Drawing Scale
OBO Project Number
N.T.S.
THERMAL CLIP W/ CONTINUOUS VERTICAL GALVANIZED SUBGIRT
TER SLOPED 1 TO DRAIN
OBO/PDCS/DE
CONSULAR ENTRY DETAILS
INS-1, R-10 50MM RIGID BOARD INSULATION
A. Consular Entry Canopy PV and Gutter Detail
RACE; TO MATCH FC-3
DESCRIPTION The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Architecture and Planning CMP-1 METAL PANEL (FC-1) AESS ARCHITECTURALLY EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL GL-7, CANOPY GLASS CONCEALED CANOPY GUTTER SLOPED TO DRAIN
Drawing Title
AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT. DWGS
1 : 10
Po 71 Se Ph Fa
FACADE KEYNOTES
ALIGN
CONT. ALUM. SUPPORT ATTACHED TO PLATE STL; TO MATCH FC-3
4
6. CONSULAR ENTRY CANOPY AESS DETAILING TO BE CATEGORY 3; REF. SPEC.
STIFFENER PLATES; REF STRUCT DWGS
BUILT-UP AESS ANGLE COL. TO NUMBER MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT DWGS. F4 F23 AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCT DWGS. F37 F66
K
A452 A454
3. ALL MEMBER-TO-MEMBER AND MEMBER-TO-CONCRETE WALL CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE DESIGNED TO DEVELOP THE FULL YEILD STRENGTH OF THE STEEL AND ALUMINUM FRAMING MEMBERS AS OUTLINED IN THE BLAST REPORT.
CO N NS OT TR FO UC R TI O N
0 A451
CANOPY GENERAL NOTES
6000
6000
AESS GIRDER MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS AESS BUILT-UP ANGLE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
PV ARRAY
WARNING: This document is the property of the U.S. Government. Further reproduction and/or distribution outside the contractor team is prohibited without the express written approval of:
EMBED PLATE
AESS STIFFENER PLATES PROVIDED AT COLUMN LOCATIONS; TO MATCH FC-3
2
NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND for Guatemala City, Guatemala
F4
AESS BAR WELDED AND SEALED
MTL RAIN LEADER
LEVEL 5 1503.50
D.C.
Washington,
PV ARRAY 1%
O
F23
United States Department of State OVERSEAS BUILDINGS OPERATIONS
10 A451
F37
F4
1%
AESS BUILT-UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
9
UNCL
6 A451
FLASHING ANDF23 COUNTERFLASHING
9 A451
8
LEVEL 6 1508.00
1508.00
STL PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm OC 7 A451
18
17 NOB
1
7000
TO END OF HSS
13
NOB
520
ALIGN
11
10
CO N NS OT TR FO UC R TI O N
9
4500
8
8
9
United States Departm OVERSEAS BUILDINGS Washington,
NEW EMBA COMPOU for Guatemala City, G
625 425
MTL .GUTTER; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY; SLOPED TO DRAIN
200
WARNING: This document is the property of the U.S reproduction and/or distribution outside the contracto the express written approval of:
PV ARRAY RAIL
U.S. Department of State ATTN: Mona Kuntz, Consular For Management Affairs Washington, DC 20520
PV ARRAY SUPPORT
200
AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3 DOWNPIPE @ EVERY OTHER BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
C
A
PV ARRAY
2%
2
PV ARRAY RAIL PV ARRAY SUPPORT
A451 A452
SECTION @ MSGR CANOPY GUTTER 1 : 10
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C. AESS BUILT-UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
AESS C-CHANNELS TO MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
AESS BUILT-UP ANGLE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCTURAL DWGS.
Drawing by Knot Landscape Architecture
1 A451 A452
SECTION @ MSGR CANOPY
5
1 : 10
A451 A452
PLAN @ MSGR CANOPY SEAT WALL
CONSTRUCTA REVIEW
1 : 10
PV RAIL
Rev Number
BUILT-UP AESS PLATE AND TUBE BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY PV ARRAY SUPPORT
EMBED PLATE
B
Description
Revisions
ST-2 PARAPET CAP
P 7 S P F
130
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C.
VARIES
25MM X 450MM PLATE STL WELDED TO TUBE
ST-2 RAINSCREEN ASSEMBLY ON CLIP SYSTEM
The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Architecture and Planning
350
600
260
HSS 304.4 X 50.8 X 6.4 STL TUBE
210
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
Release For Construction: OBO/PDCS/PDC
50
CANOPY DETAILS OBO Project Number
SAQMMA14F3174
3 A451 A452
B. Structural bent connection to retaining wall
SECTION @ MSGR PV CONNECTION
4
1 : 10
A451 A452
SECTION @ MSGR CANOPY SEAT WALL
44 7
8
9
10
ALL DIMENSIONS WITHOUT A DECIMAL ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNITS. ALL DIMENSIONS WITH A DECIMAL ARE IN METERS UNITS.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
As Indicated
Phase 15%
3
Date
1 : 10
UNCLASSIFIED
Drawing Scale
CADD Plot Scale CADD File Name GUA_MSGR_A_Central_R15.rvt 1:1
18
CO N NS OT TR FO UC R TI O N
A. Visitor Plaza Canopy
OBO/PDCS/DE
Drawing Title
DECEMBER 7,2
Drawn By Checked By Project
Aut
Chec
Number
Classification
131
U
UNCLASSIFIED
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
10
12
13
14
UNCLASSIFIED
Establishing an architectural language The project consists of several buildings, plazas and canopies in addition to the main embassy building. Two freestanding canopies are located across the site to shade occupants in the tropical climate. These structures integrate similar details from the larger canopies attached to the main building and continue a similar architectural language throughout the site. Each canopy consists of a series of L-shaped structural bents which rest upon a series of beams and columns. A photovoltaic array provides shade and protection from the weather while also contributing to the project’s overall sustainability goals. This study depicts several iterations of the canopies and the supporting details which propagate the architectural language of the main embassy building.
MTL .GUTTER; TO MATCH FC-3 AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
DOWNPIPE @ EVERY OTHER BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
MTL .GUTTER; TO MATCH FC-3 AESS BUILT UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
DOWNPIPE @ EVERY OTHER BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY
2%
2
PV ARRAY RAIL PV ARRAY SUPPORT
A451 A452
SECTIO 1 : 10
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C. AESS BUILT-UP PLATE AND TUBE STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY
2%
2
PV ARRAY RAIL PV ARRAY SUPPORT
A451 A452
SECTIO 1 : 10
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C. AESS BUILT-UP PLATE AND TUBE AESS C-CHANNELS TO MATCH FC-3; STRUCTURAL BENT; TO MATCH FC-3 REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
AESS BUILT-UP ANGLE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; REF STRUCTURAL DWGS.
AESS C-CHANNELS TO MATCH FC-3; REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
SECTION @ MSGR CANOPY
AESS BUILT-UP ANGLE COL. TO MATCH FC-3; 1 REF. STRUCTURAL DWGS
5
A451 A452 FC-3; 1 : 10 AESS TUBE COL. TO MATCH REF STRUCTURAL DWGS.
A451 A452
PLAN @ 1 : 10
PV RAIL
A451 A452
D
BUILT-UP AESS PLATE AND TUBE BENT; TO MATCH 5 FC-3
PV ARRAY
1
SECTION @ MSGR CANOPY PV ARRAY SUPPORT
EMBED PLATE A451 A452
1 : 10
PLAN @ 1 : 10
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C.
VARIES
25MM X 450MM PLATE STL WELDED TO TUBE
600
HSS 304.4 X 50.8 X 6.4 STL TUBE PV RAIL BUILT-UP AESS PLATE AND TUBE BENT; TO MATCH FC-3
PV ARRAY LED LIGHT FIXTURE PV ARRAY SUPPORT
EMBED PLATE
STL. PIPE SUPPORT FOR PV ARRAY; 1000mm O.C.
VARIES
25MM X 450MM PLATE STL WELDED TO TUBE
600
C. MSGR Canopy Study
HSS 304.4 X 50.8 X 6.4 STL TUBE
D. Canopy PV/Structural detail 3 A451 A452
LED LIGHT FIXTURE SECTION @ MSGR PV CONNECTION
4
1 : 10
A451 A452
SECTIO 1 : 10
45
UNCLASSIFIED 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 3
10
11
12
SECTION @ MSGR PV CONNECTION
13
14 4
SECTIO
VIEWING VESSEL CABIN COMPETITION ENTRY 2018
--
CABINS Competition Finalist Polytown Media
This cabin was submitted to an architectural visualization competition intended to feature smallscale architecture in fully modeled 3D environments. Six modules come together to create a viewing ‘vessel’-- a space where the inhabitant is simultaneously connected to the land, sea and sky. The wood-clad volumes create a simple linear form that sits lightly on the land and hovers over the water. The landscape was inspired by British Columbia: vast mountain ranges, deep lakes, lush forests and the occasional glimpse of the aurora borealis. The cabin responds to this condition with limited, but direct apertures that frame a series of views. Collaboration with Ben Emery
46
(above) Schematic floor plan (left) Exterior and primary living space views
49
CONSTRUCTING THE GESTALT UNDERGRADUATE THESIS 2015 - 2016 --
Thesis Prize Finalist (top 5 Virginia Tech Class of 2016)
Gestalt (n) : A physical, biological, psychological or symbolic configuration or pattern of elements so unified as a whole that its properties cannot be derived from a simple summation of its parts. The formulation of new architectural objects is explored through a composition of elements that constructs a gestalt architecture. The elements, composed in a symbiotic relationship, create a network of interdependent, unique characters that form an implied whole. The qualities of this unseen whole, or perceived ‘wholeness’ define a stronger sense of place in the built environment. A position against the immediate formulation of an architectural object is proposed, and that the nature of the object is implied through an aggregation of elements. Architecture does not have to be an explicit expression of totality, but instead can engage the senses and uncover its total nature through the inhabitant’s experience. The uncovering of this implicit whole, gestalt, or totality is the sense of place.
Elements
Place
This thesis is the result of exploratory studies, testing ideas through small projects, and a final intervention at Maryhill Loops Road in Goldendale, WA.
Gestalt
50
Perspectives This series zooms into architectural elements to investigate the scalelessness of the gestalt. An aperture, opening, room, wall and staircase are represented as implicit entities in space as a result of a specific composition of elements. Each ‘whole’ is more than the sum of the individual parts because it is dependent on the specific form and proximity of all the parts to each other.
53
Maryhill Loops Road Interventions The intervention plays out across three areas in the Maryhill Loops Road site. These areas include a workshop, highway eatery and terminus for the historic road. The objective of the study is to design a framework in which a sense of place may be constructed. The three areas give inhabitants the choice to move between them in whatever order they choose to, as opposed to an orchestrated sequence of moves. As the inhabitants move through the different buildings at each area their experience will result in a slightly different ‘framework of place’. Much like the architecture though, this framework seeks an ‘ideal’ state even though it can never be achieved. 1.
A prototyping and fabrication workshop, manufacturing archive, visitor center, small greeting pavilion and a lookout point
2.
A small eatery, overlook platform and restroom facility
3. An observation tower, A small restroom facility, and an event pavilion
54
Workshop, Visitor Center & Observation Pavilion This area is given a prototyping and fabrication laboratory for longboard skateboards and the necessary infrastructure needed to manufacture small batches of goods. An archive for molds used in the manufacturing process is incorporated into a visitor center that welcomes people to the site. A small pavilion greets visitors and acknowledges the start of the road. Finally, a lookout point engages the diverse topography of the site allowing views out to the surrounding landscape and wind farm.
(right) Figure-ground diagram showing the derivation of the collective form. (below) Section perspective through the visitor center and workshop.
56
1. Tangent lines derived from road’s curvature
2. Vertical walls mark a boundary and define volumes
3. Horizontal planes define interior spaces and reach out to site
4. Overhead planes intervene in interstitial space
5. Walls are given different thicknesses and materials to imply rooms.
6. Floor plates recede and share common boundary.
57
An aggregation of parts is traced in the formwork of the monolithic walls. Variation in the formwork panels provides a spatial reference to position oneself within the whole. Even at the scale of a wall’s formwork connections can be made back to the ‘whole’. 58
5 1
3
2
4
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Visitor center Office space Showroom/Retail space Parking area Observation pavilion
(top left) Section through office showing concrete wall formwork pattern (left) Spatial effects of panelized formwork and exterior wall material juxtaposition to emphasize one’s place within the whole
59
Eatery, Overlook Platform and Restroom Enhancements to an existing overlook point are proposed to create a destination along Highway 97. A small eatery, overlook platform and restroom facility bring new function and purpose to the area while also engaging Maryhill Loops Road from a completely different vantage point..
(right) Figure ground diagram of buildings as they relate to the road (below) Perspective rendering of overlook point and views from eatery and platform
60
Terminus, Observation Tower & Pavilion The final area acts as a terminus for events held at Maryhill Loops Road and a destination for visitors in the area. An observation tower creates a visual relationship to the other sites. A small restroom facility and pavilion enhances the site’s ability to hold large crowds that gather at the bottom of the road during events.
(right) Figure ground diagram of buildings and event area at the road’s terminus (below) View of terminus and event space.
61
“Envisioning a Cognitive Whole” 2016
VISUALIZATION BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS 2021 One of the skills I have developed over time is visualizing projects in-house to develop design and craft a narrative for a project. At BellCraft Architects one of my many contributions was creating compelling images of ongoing work to bring clients into the design as it was being finalized. These images also led to acquiring new work and were a valuable asset during client interviews as a demonstration of the firm’s capabilities. The following images were creating primarily with a combination Sketchup, Enscape and Photoshop. I was responsible for developing the interiors, detail modeling, scene development, material generation and post-processing.
64
Exterior and interior views of a single-family home near Cle Elum, WA. Construction expected to start in early 2022.
65
Exterior and interior views of a prospective vacation home near Cle Elum, WA.
66
67
68
Exterior and interior views of a single-family home in eastern Washington.
69
PHOTOGRAPHY BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS 2021 At BellCraft Architects I was tasked with documenting recently completed projects as part of a larger revitalization effort within the firm. This involved travel to project sites, coordination with clients for access, staging, cleanup and photography for a variety of project styles. With limited resources and an aging kit, my approach to photographing each project was to treat the architecture as the subject of the photograph. Rather than constantly searching for the ideal overall shot, my approach looks at key visual moments within the project that celebrate the unique aspects of the design. These images aggregate the design thinking in the project and will hopefully serve the firm for many years to come.
Detail shots from various projects highlighting joinery and material intersections.
70
Renovation and addition to a single-family home in Seattle, WA.
71
(this page) New single-family home in Teanaway, WA. (opposite page) Vacation home in Cle Elum, WA.
72
73
74
(this page) Condo renovation in West Seattle, WA. (opposite page) Physical therapy office in Laurelhurst, Seattle, WA.
75
BRAND & GRAPHIC DESIGN BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS 2021 As part of a larger revitalization effort within the firm, I was tasked with taking brand assets developed by a consulting graphic designer and translating them into physical collateral for the firm such as business cards and job-site signs. I worked with principals to develop their visual identity based through established brand standards and created a typographical hierarchy for future collateral. During this effort I consistently studied each task with multiple layouts to establish a graphical identity that remains consistent across different types of collateral. I also worked with print shops to select finishes and adapt the brand assets to industry standards.
For rest B i beau
4444 4444Woodland WoodlandPark ParkAve AveNN Suite Suite102 102
bbr ri ai an@ n@bbeel l cl cra raf fta tarc rchi hite teccts ts.co .comm
206 206661 6614665 4665
220066 6661 61 44666655
bellcraftarchitects.com bellcraftarchitects.com
Seattle, Seattle,WA WA98103 98103
be l l c ra f t a rc hi te c t s .co m
2 0 6 661 4 6 65
S e at t l e, WA 9 81 03
4 4 4 4 Woodlan d Park Ave N Su ite 102
BUSINESS CARD OPTIONS
S u i te 1 02
2 06 661 4665
4 4 4 4 Wo o d l an d Pa r k Ave N
PORTRAIT PORTRAIT -- OPTION OPTION D D
br i a n@ b e l l c ra f t a rc h i te ct s .co m
O wn e r + A rc hi te c t
DREAM. PLAN. CREATE.
bria n@ be llc ra ft arch itec ts .com
O wn e r + Arc hi te ct
O Ow wnneerr ++ A Arc rchhiite tecctt
B ri an Palm be rg
757 705 7005
LANDSCAPE - OPTION B
BBrriiaann Pa Pallm mbbeerg rg
USINESS CARD BUSINESS CARD OPTIONS OPTIONS
forrest@bellcraftarch itects.com
b el l craftarchi tects .co m
20 6 6 61 4 6 6 5
S eattl e, WA 9 8 103
S ui te 102
4 4 4 4 Wo o d l and Park Ave N
LANDSCAPE - OPTION B
Project Arch itect
Seattle, WA 9 8103 bellcraftarch itects.com
OPTIONS
2 0 6 661 4 6 6 5 EAM. PLAN. CREATE.
Br ia n Pa lm be rg
© COPYRIGHT 2021 BELLCRAFT ARCHITECTS, INC.
76
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
DRE AM. P L AN. C RE ATE .
D REA M. PLA N . CREAT E.
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
DRE AM. P L AN. C RE ATE .
D REA M. PLA N . CREAT E.
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
www.bellcraftarchitects.com
DRE AM. P L AN. C RE ATE .
D REA M. PLA N . CREAT E.
77
forrestbibeau.com forrest@forrestbibeau.com (757) 705-7005