John Kalamaja
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e Po r t f o l i o 2021
Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas | 2019
About Me Full-time student, designer, and avid outdoorsman striving to spend any and all time in the outdoors. Love for nature has been enstilled in me ever since I was small and has only strengthened since. I chose to study landscape architecture because it gives me the ability to recreate experiences that I have had in nature, and design those experiences for others. Other than my design related strengths, my most valuable ability is my passion for people. Everyone brings something to the table in terms of design from professionals to community members.
Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas | 2019
01
02
03
04
05
06
Norfolk Brownfield Redevelopment Visioning
Worked in collaboration with city officals and community members to design adaptive resuse strategies for the redevelopment of a brownfield in Norfolk, Nebraska.
Montana Sky Resort
Remote resort atop of the Bear Canyon valley offering 360 degrees of stunning views while designing connections between the site and local and regional attractions.
Street City Vietnam, UNI Design Competition
The competition called for a fish market design for Thu Thiem, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Vietnam’s past narratives inspired urban design strategies and strengthend the design outcomes.
Northview Rising
A partnership between Kansas State University and Northview Rising which are in despirate need of resolved connectivity issues within the community and city of Manhattan.
Concentric Arrows — Internship Experience
A featured project from my summer internship with GH2 Architects LLC. along with takeaways in my professional development as landscape architect.
Construction Documentation
Series of construction documents and details for Edwards Hall at Kansas State University.
Ferris Wheel Farmers Market
Great Lawn
The Stockyard aerial view of the two major spaces: Nebraska Adventure Park and the Great Lawn.
01
Nebraska Adventure Park
Merit Award, ASLA Central States Competition (Design Unbuilt)
The Stockyard
Norfolk, Nebraksa | Kansas State University
To help attract and maintain a population of new residents and young professionals to Norfolk, mixed-use development engages people by providing various amenities and activities. The Stockyard provides public and private spaces for residents and the local community. This new development provides young families with housing near jobs and green space for children to play. Great Lawn and Bison Brewery provide places for social interaction among community members and vistors. By connecting the Stockyard to downtown and the Cowboy Trail, the community will continue to grow strong as young families find their home in Norfolk. Design Team: Anna Rader, Conan Brennan, and John Kalamaja
Map showing the study area location compared to other ammenities of Norfolk. Graphic created by Anna Rader.
Above: At the site analysis stage of The Stockyard development, a pedestrian connection between our study area and other ammenities of Norfolk (like downtown and the Elkhorn River) were identified. Right: Identified existing elements on site reveal a staple in Norfolk’s past. The buildings that are highlighted in blue are perserved and redeveloped. The covered structure is proposed to be a farmers market and the brick building is transformed into office space.
Perserved building within the existing stockyards.
Graphic created by Anna Rader.
Proposed 1st Street Redevelopment map. Graphic created by Anna Rader.
Above: Graphic showing the route of the proposed streetscape design within Norfolk. 1st street will connect the development with existing amenitites of downtown Norfolk and the Cowboy Trail. Right: The streetscape design includes a sidewalk as well as a bike lane to accomadate the bike traffic from the Cowboy Trail. The streetscape also includes plantings on both sides of the street to create a barrier between the sidewalk and road which increases comfort and the snse of safety for pedestrians.
Existing 1st Street streetscape.
Proposed 1st Street Redevelopment design
Photomontage created by Anna Rader.
NORFOLK SURVEY REPORT MIND MAP
DESIGN PROCESS The Norfolk community was invited to participate in the design process from conceptual idea meetings to final design reviews. At the beginning of this process, the design team first reviewed community comments (from a survey distributed at the beginnning of this project) to identify their key visions for the site. A mind map based on the survey was drawn to narrow down programming objectives. The team developed a series of bubble diagrams and conceptual forms at masterplan scale. Key elements were identified and formalized shapes emerged as the bare bones of the design. Once the formal design was finalized from a conceptual standpoint, smaller spaces, such as the Nebraska Adventure Park, were designed with overarching geometries.
Conceptual bubble diagrams.
Created by design team.
NEBRASKA ADVENTURE PARK The Nebraska Adventure Park is one of the main community spaces in The Stockyard. The park’s design was inspired by the ecoregions in Nebraska. Precedent research identified means to abstractly represent these ecoregions. The ecoregions are all distinctly different which allows visitors to have a variety of experiences in the different zones of the park. These ecoregions influenced the programing and plantings of each zone to make it feel as if your emersed within that ecoregion. Precedent study for the Nebraska Adventure Park. Ceated by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
Ferris Wheel
Pedestrian Corridor
Large Promonade
The Great Lawn looking is the hub of The Stockyard with the Ferris wheel being the focal element. Ceated by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
THE GREAT LAWN The great lawn is the main green space within the development which is primarly used as a large gathering space for residents and the surrounding community. The Great Lawn is designed to be used for many different activities such as: concerts and well designated locations for food trucks. Large promanades flank all sides of the great lawn to accomadate for all the pedestrian traffic as it is the hub of The Stockyard. The Great Lawn contains a ferris wheel which as the focal element is a response to the community’s desire for an amusement park. Shops flank the Great Lawn to provide extra space for merchants. The lawn is designed to accomadate large sculptures to allow local artists to display thier work.
The Great Lawn provides space for many types of recreational activities. Ceated by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
THE STOCKYARD OFFICE
OFFICE
FARMERS MARKET
THE SHOPS
THE SHOPS
ELKORN APRATMENTS
DISCOVERY CENTER
Plan of The Stockyard. Ceated by Anna Rader.
Moveable Garage Doors
Market Flex Space
Farmers Market
Farmers market utilizing the retractable doors to create comfort environment within the market. Ceated by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
Above: The Farmers Market is located in the perserved stockyard building on site. The building is modified with retractable doors so it can be used in all seasons. The doors create a commortable environment in summer or winter months. This space is designed to hold a variety of vendors from farmers to food truck owners to sell their products with ease. Left: The pedestrian corridor spans throughout the entire development and connects the three major spaces: the Farmers Market, the Great Lawn, and the Nebraska Adventure Park. This corridor is expressed on the facades, with glass, on the buildings to vertically highlight the corridor. The corridor is expressed on the ground plane with changes in paving materials like brick. Pedestrian corridor connecting the main spaces.
Ceated by Anna Rader.
Bison Brewey nightlife and recreational activities.
Ceated by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
Shade Structure
Performance Space
Recreation Lawn
NEBRASKA ADVENTURE PARK The Nebraska Adventure Park is a public park that is located on the southern end of The Stockyard for kids and families in the development as well as families from the city of Norfolk. This park is comprised of six different spaces each with a unique activity and experience. Norfolk Plaza, the Trampolines, Running Logs, Play Mounds, Splash Pad, and the Bouldering Walls are all inclusive spaces for people to play and relax while being in the outdoors. These spaces are very unique in that each has a different feeling and reveals a different ecoregion of Nebraska.
Nebraska Adventure Park Plan. Created by Anna Rader and John Kalamaja.
NEBRASKA ECOREGIONS
To tell the story of how Norfolk relates to the rest of the state of Nebraska, the design replicates how the Elkhorn River and the Cowboy Trail span across the state. The four main ecoregions: loess hills, wetlands, sandhills, and badlands are in order from east to west as you would encounter them driving across the state of Nebraska. The Nebraska Adventure Park is designed to be a nature-based play. The ecoregions were used as inspiration to create the abstract forms for the nature-based play. For example, hills and rock forms of the sandhills and badlands were abstracted into the rolling mounds and boulders for play and relaxation. This method was also applied to the other ecoregion features.
NORFOLK
Nebraska Adventure Park ecoregions Diagram. Created by Anna Rader.
Bear Canyon Resort atop of the Bear Canyon valley connecting to other amenities like Bear Canyon Road and the Bear Canyon Loop Trail.
02
Montana Sky Resort Bozeman, Montana | Kansas State University
Bear Canyon Resort (BCR) is located 11 miles southeast of Bozeman, Montana atop of the Bear Canyon. On the north side of the site, Bear Canyon Road brings travels through a scenic setting through Bear Canyon that leads them right to the Bear Canyon Retreat. With BCR sitting atop of Bear Canyon, it offers stunning 360 degree views of the surrounding mountain range and of the Bozeman metropolitian area. BCR is affliated with Montana State University that is a sky camp destination in a scenic mountain setting that offers retreats, workshops, conferences, and camping experiences year-round. BCR provides a variety of activities and ammenties to accomadate groups up to 100 people for a stay of a week or two. Because of the BCR’s size, it provides many fun opportunities for visitors to explore during their stay. For example, activities provided range from hiking, mountian biking, equistrain, and high ropes courses, and more for people to enjoy.
Bozeman Int’l Airport Four Corners, MT Mount Ellis
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT
I-90
Chestnut Mountain
Bear Canyon Road Forest Service Land
Bear Canyon Creek Bear Canyon Loop Trail
Bear Canyon Creek Bear Canyon Resort
Site context of BCR.
Bozeman Int’l Airpot Belgrade, MT Bozeman, MT Montana State University
Big Sky Resort
Livingston, MT
I-90
10 Miles 20 Miles
Yellowstone National Park 40 Miles Hebgen Lake
60 Miles
Regional Context of BCR
Above & Left: Context was important when determining a site both regional and site specific as they would influence design decisions. Focused on connectivity to existing amenities like roads, trails, and regional attractions to further enhance the visitors experience at Bear Canyon Resort. These connections influenced the design as it created access points to specific locations on site and used existing roads to connect the resort to the regional attractions. Views were also important factors that influenced design decisions. The Bear Canyon valley provided a stunning view of the Bozeman metropolitian area along with 360-degree views of the Rocky Mountians. This infulenced building position and programing in the resort. Right: Bear Canyon Resort is located within the Rocky Mountians which created design challenges. Slope analysis showed little amounts of developable land, in the green, versus the amount of undevelopable land, in the red. Due to this challenge, it influenced building placement and programing based on slope. For example, larger buildings were on developable land and housing and smaller buidlings were built into the slope. Slope influenced programing like a high ropes course and mixed-use trails.
0-5%
5.01-10%
10.1-15%
15.01%+
Architecture precedents of BCR.
A
Proposed Programming: Welcome Lodge and Conference Center | 40,000 sq. ft Dining Hall | 15,000 sq. ft | 2 stories Education Center | 18,000 sq. ft | 2 stories Small Group Cabins | 29 cabins | 30’ x 20’ Ranch Hotel | 30,000 sq. ft | 1 story Artist’s Residency Cabin | 13,000 sq. ft | Living & Studio space Hiking and Biking Trails | Over 7 miles Overlook Tower | 5 stories with lookout platform Outdoor Amphitheater | Seating up to 150 people Highropes Course & Zipline | 4,300 ft Public Campfire Pits & Tent Camping | 4 spots Large Fenced Pasture for Ranch Activities | 2 areas
Atop of Bear Canyon looking towards Bozeman from the deck of the Welcome Center.
B
Public firepits for visitors while providing oppourtunities for tent camping.
SitePilanle:nn1e”ti=4
Site Plan: 1” = 400’
SitePilanle:ni1
SiitePlSiaPSant:1a :i”Sia=SS4a01:l’ SitePl
SitePlan:e1l”=:n
SitePilanle:ni1
SiStePlPaSiStePn:1S”=
SiStePlPaSiStePn:1S”=
SitePl
SitePlainteP
SitePilanlePtSS:
SitePSlaen:S
A
Sit
SiStePlPaSiStePn:1S”= SitePlan:1t”
SitePl SitePlan:1 SiSitePlaa SitePlan:1”nP”= SitePlan:1
SitePl
SiteSPlant:P1”=4eS:0
SitePl
SitePlan:1”=:4te
SitePtlaPln
SitePl
B
SittePlan:e1i”=40
SiteiPelan:t1
Scale: 1” = 400’ 0’
200’
400’
800’
Hidden Courtyard
Contemplation Corridor
Fish Market
Unvieling the Forgotten within the context of Thu Thiem.
03
Shortlisted, UNI Design Competition
Street City Vietnam: Unveiling the Forgotten Thu Theim, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
The new master plan of Thu Thiem, Ho Chi Minh City will transition the city from old and outdated to a more modernized scene. To relate to this transition, Unveiling the Forgotten is inspired by past narratives of Ho Chi Minh City and Vietnam. The design is based on the Khmer Empire which was one of the first civilizations and the most powerful in southeast Asia. By referencing the Khmer Empire’s orthogonal infrastructure, like the complex cannal system, the overall geometries of the fish market were designed. The orthogonal form was expressed in layers to define spaces and create different sensory experiences in each space. The baray, a large reservoir, was abstracted to be the organizing element within the fish market which also made it a focal element.
Photomantage technique was used as a conceptual idea development tool for Unveiling the Forgotten.
S HO RT L I ST E D AN INTERNATIONAL DESIGN COMPETITION HELB BY UNI 56 ENTRIES: 21 PROFESSIONAL AND 35 STUDENT ENTRIES
Landscape architect Pierre Belanger said that landscape architects need to recognize past narratives of a place. So, through research of Vietnam history, the ancient Khmer Empire in southeast Asia and Vietnam was revealed. This civilization was known for their extensive stormwater managment and infrastructure. Orothogonal ground plane design.
Comtemplation Corridor at night with lights highlighting the baray within the fish market.
Proposed Casement Road design.
Northview Rising Manhattan, Kansas | Kansas State University
Project is intended to develop schematic design proposals for the residents of the Northview community. Proposals recieved feedback from residents of the Northview and were adjusted based off feedback and suggestions from a series of community engagement events. The Casement Corridor Project focuses on connectivity and safety along Casement Road. The project is aimed to implement places to sit, signage, a bike lane, enhanced lighting, and safer crosswalks for people to safely navigate Northview and resolve disconnects within the community. In addition to safety, adding planted areas with stormwater management techniques solving flooding problems Northview faces often while enhancing curb appeal by creating aesthetic and desirable spaces along a major corridor. Design Team: Dylan Ramage, Samuel Coup, Sam Wolkey, and John Kalamaja
04
Community Engagement Process Overall, all community engagement events our group attended, we received positive feedback on many aspects of the proposed design. Northview community was enthusiastic about the opportunity to connect existing neighborhood amenities like the proposed Dix and Casement Park and Power Line Trail to city amenities like Linear Trail and Western Heritage Trail at Rocky Ford. We received some pushback on the bike lane on Casement Road because of high volume traffic and speeding issues. Based on community feedback and deliberation between our group, we decided to keep the proposed bike lane while improving Casement conditions by adjusting lane width to promote slower driving and decrease the high volume of traffic within Northview.
April 10th, 2021 As a clas, we gathered at a park within the Northview community and hosted a grill-out, inviting community members to enjoy some food and hearing our initial ideas/concepts for the transformation of the Northview commuity.
Community engagement event photos courtesty of Nicole Beard.
Tree Plantings
Tree’s will be used to provide shade and comfort to the sidewalk and bike lane. These trees will be native species and able to withstand streetscape conditions.
Pedestrian Sidewalk
The existing sidewalk will be kept and improved to accomadate foot traffic along Casement.
Curb Cuts
The existing curb on Casement will changed to add incremental curb cuts which will allow stormwater from the street into the rain gardens.
Seating Elements
Benches will be placed along the pedestrain sidewalk for rest and relaxation.
Rain Gardens
Rain gardens will be planted inbetween the pedestrain sidewalk and bike lane. Will collect, retain, and treat stromwater on site.
Bike Lane
Adjacent to the street, it will connect existing paths and trails in Northview. Paint will help with wayfinding within the nieghborhood.
Traffic Reflectors
Will seperate the bike lane from Casement Rd. creating a barrier between them making the bike lane safer.
Casement Road
Proposed streetscape design photomontage.
Existing road will be kept but lane width will be altered to accomodate the bike lane.
Turfgrass
April 18th, 2021
April 25th, 2021
We informally presented our ideas and heard constructive feedback about the bike lane proposal and positive feedback about the bench, intersection design, and the proposed connections.
The following week at the pop-up park, we met with a few community members from different age groups, and they gave us similar feedback with great excitement.
Rain Garden
Rain Garden
Benches
Traffic Reflectors
14’
Drive Lane
Drive Lane
2’
5’ Bike Lane
13’ Planting Bed
4’ Sidewalk
12’
Car-Pedsetrain Buffer
Planting Bed
12’
11’ Planting Bed
66’
R.O.W
Proposed streetscape design section.
Tree Plantings
Tree’s will be used to provide shade and comfort to the sidewalk and bike lane. These trees will be native species and able to withstand streetscape conditions.
Rain Gardens
Rain gardens will be planted in between the pedestrain sidewalk and Casement Rd. Will collect, retain, and treat stromwater on site.
Seating Elements
Benches will be placed along the pedestrain sidewalk for rest and relaxation.
Bike Lane
Adjacent to the sidewalk, it will connect existing paths and trails in Northview. Paint will help with wayfinding within the nieghborhood.
Pedestrain Sidewalk
The existing sidewalk will be kept and expanded to accomadate foot and bike traffic along Casement Rd.
Native Plantings Proposed sidewalk design photomontage.
Native plants will be utilized along the sidewalk to improve aesthetic qualities of the streetscape.
Proposed Bench Design
Construction Process
Several places along Casement Road, there is a lack of public seating. This proposed bench, will be placed along the sidewalk between amenities to allow a place where pedestrians and cyclists can rest.
The frame of the bench is constructed with steel tubing welded together. Smaller steel tubing was welded to the square legs to complete the frame of the bench.
Wood planks were cut and the edges were sanded to smooth the sharp edge. Under the planks, a quarter inch piece of wood was placed on top of steel tubing to allow the wood planks to be flush with the steel legs.
The bench was taken out to site after completion to take pictures. The bench was designed to be simple so this could easily be replicated if this bench were to be implemented into Northview.
Native Planting Seating Elements
Rain Garden Casement Rd.
8’
6’
5’
15’
Planting Bed
Sidewalk
Bike Lane
Planting Bed
34’ R.O.W
Proposed sidewalk design section.
West elevation of Concentric Arrows.
Concentric Arrows Broken Arrrow, Oklahoma | GH2 Architects LLC.
Concentric arrows is a conceptual design for the city of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma to serve as a visual gateway. Broken Arrow has struggled defining its identity from the neighboring city, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The city contracted GH2 Architects to create an iconic sculpture derived from the city logo. The concept is comprised of six arrayed small arrows paired with the larger arrrow, the city logo, shooting out from a concentric point. The framing structure is designed to be a partial globe which is to be completed within the viewers perception allowing the sculpture to be dynamic in all viewing angles. The iconic sculpture was large in scale but had to be designed with acknowledging the context. Concentric Arrows is located along a major highway which was integral part of the concept, designing it for all viewers either within the park or driving. This concept was presented in front of city officals and was selected to be the iconic sculpture for the primary entrance into the city.
05
Plaza space within Concentric Arrows.
GH2 Summer Interns. Courtesy of Madison Wells.
My time during the summer of 2021 was spent in Tulsa, Oklahoma at GH2 Architects LLC. This was such a valuable experience for me as I was able to expand my knowledge in the field of landscape architecture as well as improving my technical and graphic skills. Everyone at GH2 Architects served as mentors to me as they took time out of their days to invest time in me to develop the best possible design for the client. My internship experience allowed me to open my eyes to see design through a different lens as I had to transform my thinking from academic design to doing whats best for the client. At GH2, the client is who we design for and we do not put our agenda ahead of theirs, producing the best product for their needs. During my time with GH2 Architects, I
was able to develop some of my technical and graphical skills. Throughout my academic career, I was competent in alot of programs, but I was able to gain profciency in them during my experience at GH2. For example, my technical skills in Sketchup, Lumion, and AutoCAD. These were not only important programs that we used, but it greatly improved my work flow and efficency within these programs. Graphical standards and techniques were also developed during my internship experience especially my sketching ability. Sketching has never played a huge role in my design process but now has become an integral part in the conceptual phase in the design process. My graphic standards were improved in taking that extra step to be nit-picky in renderings before presentations. Concentric Arrows night design.
TENNIS COURTS
W.1
L.O.W 1078.00 1077.0
0
1076.00 1075.00
1074.00
1073.00
CHESTER E. PETERS RECREATION CENTER
1072.00
1071.00
1070.00
1077.00
1069.00
1068.00
78
115
114
113
112
111
110
109
10
116
117
118
121
120
119
123
122
124
TRASH
.0
0
W.1
W.3
7.00
106
W.2
108
1079.00
M1
107
M2
1080
.00
M3 106 M4 10
81
M5
.0
0
105 64
M6
14
CURB CUT 47
L.1
1082
104
.00
W.1
1083.00
103
CURB CUT
63
80
46
12
1084
.00
W.1
1067.00
11
P
78
101
28
44
61
P.6
29
45 1069.00
.00
62
79
102
1085
13
30
P.3
10
P.8
27
43
60
77
O
1069.00
100
8
24 40
.00
23
56
39
55
38
1086
.00
.00
84
73
P.5
P.4
1082
.00
1083
10
L.4
95
L.O
21
54
93
71
92
70
37
P.2
20
36
53
6
F
1
K
.W
SPEED TABLE
D
E
J
0
.0
85
10
W.3
7
22
L
72
94
N
P.1
25
41
57
74
96
.00
68
58
75
97
9
26 10
1072
1073.00
1074.00
1075.00
1076.00
1077.00
1078.00
1079.00
42 59
76
98
M
1081.00
EXISTING SIDELWALK
1080.00
.00
1071.00
10
1070.00
87
.00
PL.1 99
REF.1
90
89
19
35
L.2 .00
1069
51
68
5
18 34
.00
1069
67
17
50
33
49
32
C
REF. PLANT PALETTE
10
CURB CUT
52
69
4
16
LEGEND
88
66
W.1
3
15 87
48
65
B
CURB CUT 91 0 84.0
31
.00
2
1083
86
A
1
84
83
EXISTING CONTOURS
82
EXPANSION JOINTS (SIDEWALK)
81
REF. PLANT PALETTE
CURB CUT
125
CONTROL JOINTS (SIDEWALK)
REF.1
126
127
128
129
134
133
132
131
130
1068 .00
ROAD CENTERLINE
2
1069.00
P.7
PROPERTY LINE
1
85
1067
.00
PARKING STRIPE ACCESSIBLE AISLES/NO PARKING 1082.00
SPEED TABLE SLOPE DIRECTION CURB CUT
1081.00
139 135
136
137
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
L.O.W
138
1081.00
KERR DR 1067
148
7.00
K-STATE UNIVERSITY EDWARDS HALL
Annotated Site Plan. 1076.00
RECREATION COMPLEX SIGN
.00
Division of Human Capital Services 1810 Kerr Drive, Manhattan, KS 66502
1075
1074.00
1077.00 1076.00
1075.00
0
1074.0
1073.00
1072.00
1071.00 1073.00
1070.00
1069.00
W.1
0
1072.0
1068.00
1071.00
8
7
6
.00
P
5
9
1067.00
N
1070
0
.0
69
10
K
PLAZA/COURTYARD
0
DENISON AVE
L
M
PROPERTY LINE
1066.00
PL.2 P.8
I
J
1065.00
H
EDWARDS HALL
1068.0
Edwards Hall 1067
.00
9
8
F
C
G
PLAZA/COURTYARD
7
E
B
L.3
1066
A
3
.00
4
P.5
1065.00
152 .00 66
153
154
155
156
157
158
10
1064.00
151
Edwards Hall is located on the campus of Kansas State University in Manhattan, ANNOTATED SITE PLAN Kansas. The existing site had extensive stormwater management problems due ISSUE DATE: 07/2020 to steep slopesDECEMBER/ and existing stormwater infrastructure. The task was to develop REVISIONS: a solution for aDESCRIPTION potential building and to redirect stormwater while exhibiting MARK DATE stormwater management strategies. For Edwards Hall, a series of construction documents were created, a annotated site plan, grading plan, dimensional control plan, and planting plan. Details also accompanied the construction documents for small elements on site. Details were made for four elements on site, a wood deck, retaining wall, paving, and screening wall.
0
150
Manhattan, Kansas | Kansas State University
1065.0
149
06
DRAWN: JK
REVIEWED: INITIALS
Construction Documentation - Details A series of details were accompained with the construction document set. The task was to create a series of detials for: a wood framing structure, retaining wall, paving, and a screening wall for Edwards Hall. When creating the details for Edwards Hall, four majoir elements had to be considered: functionality, visual design, material selection, and fabrication. These considerations were important as it infulenced the design of the detail and visual apperance of that component.
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
JOHN KALAMAJA JOHN KALAMAJA JKALAMAJA@KSU.EDU JKALAMAJA@KSU.EDU
D
D
D
D
CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS Surveyor Surveyor
Architect Architect Engineer Engineer
C
C
C
C
Professor Howard Hahn Professor Howard Hahn
Edwards Hall Edwards Hall Kansas State University Kansas State University Manhattan, KS Manhattan, KS B
B
B
B
XXX XXX MARK DATE XXX XXX ISSUE: DATE MARK PROJECT NO: ISSUE: CAD DWG FILE: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CAD DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
XXX DESCRIPTION XXX Spring 2021 DESCRIPTION 001 Spring 2021
ENTER CAD FILE NAME HERE.dwg
001 JK
ENTER CAD FILE NAME HERE.dwg
JK
1078.00
1080.00
1079.00
1082 .00
1081 .00
1085
1084.
1083.0
1
10
1077
.00
TENNIS COURTS
1076.00
.00
1075
1078.00
1077.00
1076.00
1076.00
TW 1076.50
1075.00
1075.00
1074.00
TS/BW 1074.00 BW 1072.20 TS/TW 1074.00 BW 1072.00 BW 1069.35 BW 1069.35 BS BW 1070.18 1069.35 BW BW BW 1068.79 1067.85 1078.83
1072.00
1071.00
BW 1069.00
TW
10
74
.50
1077.00
BW 1076.00
10
78
INV/LPS 1065.92 BW BW 1067.77 BW 1068.61 1068.11
BW 1075.00
.0
0
1069.83
BW 1069.32 BW 1076.00
BW 1075.00
1079.00
TC 1069.52 BC 1069.02
TC 1069.73 BC 1069.23 1069.52
.00
SI
BW 1065.23 BW 1067.86 TC 1068.58 BC 1068.08
1065.00
TW 1076.50
RIM 1069.71 INV 1065.57
LPS 1068.56 81
0
TC 1068.22 BC 1067.72
10
TC 1070.18 BC 1069.68
.00
1082
.00
1083.00
TC 1069.22 BC 1068.72
TC 1069.48 BC 1068.98
TC 1069.67 BC 1069.17
80
TC 1069.04 BC 1068.54
RIM 1068.71 INV 1064.75
TC 1067.69 BC 1067.19
BW 1071.94
LPS 1061.85
TW 1078.50 BW 1067.97 BC 1067.47
TW 1078.50 BW 1067.00
1072.00
1068.00
RIM 1063.35 INV 1061.26
TW 1077.42 BW 1067.42
AD
1071.00
TC 1068.42 BC 1067.92
1067.22
1065.00
TC 1068.66 BC 1068.16
TC 1068.85 BC 1068.35
TC 1070.05 BC 1069.55
TW 1078.50 BW 1067.02
TW 1078.50 BW 1067.66 BC 1067.16 TW 1077.42 BW 1067.87 BC 1067.37
TC 1068.39 BC 1067.89
1068.31 AD
BW 1066.44
1066.88
LP 1066.61
LPS 1067.21 AD
.0
1069.00
AD
TC 1068.09 BC 1067.59
TC 1068.18 BC 1067.68
TC 1068.94 BC 1068.44
1073.00
1070.00
TW 1076.50 BW 1066.90 BC 1066.40
RIM/LP 1066.5 INV 1064.22
1067.00
10
1071.00
1065.00
SI
TC 1068.03 BC 1067.53
TC 1068.22 BC 1067.72
BW 1066.57
1072.00
INV/HPS 1063.48
TW 1076.50 BW 1066.90
1069.00
1068.00
BW 1067.92
1073.00
TW 1072.50
TW 1076.00 BW 1065.00
INV 1063.72
INV 1063.95
1067.70 TC 1069.10 BC 1068.60
TC 1069.40 BC 1068.90
TC 1069.61 BC 1069.11
108
INV/LPS 1064.52
1065.00
INV/HPS 1064.81 SI
1070.00
TC 1067.85 BC 1067.35
1.2% 1068.62
1070
0.00
TC 1068.65 BC 1068.15
TC 1069.42 BC 1068.92
TW 1069.24
BW 1074.00
TW/TC 1068.53 BC 1068.03
TC 1069.24 BC 1068.74
SI
TW 1068.53
.50
74
10
CHESTER E. PETERS RECREATION CENTER
BW 1067.85
BW 1068.11
TW 1067.85
TW
TW 1072.50
BW 1073.42
BW 1072.00
1074.00
TW 1076.00 BW 1066.75 BC 1066.25
1073.00
TW 1076.50
1074.00
BW 1074.00
1077.00
1067.00
INV 1066.57 SI
1067.90
108
1069.00
TW 1082.50
.6%
10
70
.62%
.61%
.61%
TW 1079.00
8
7
6
9
1066.15
.00
1070
N
TW 1078.60 BW 1068.60
N
TW 1078.60 BW 1068.56
.00
68
10
0
.0
69
10
1066.00
1082
TW 1079.60 BW 1069.19
1.5%
.00
84
10
.00
1083
.00
1% 1%
TW 1079.60 BW 1069.22
1075.00
TW 1079.60 BW 1069.60
AD
RIM 1069.45 INV 1067.65 L
1086
.00
BW 1069.20
TW 1079.60 BW 1069.58
M
BW BW 1074.00 1074.00
L
0
1071.00
1072.0
1073.00
1074.00
1075.00
1076.00
1077.00
1078.00
1079.00
1080.00
1081.00
1066.40
TW 1078.76 BW 1068.76
O
.00
1070.00
.87%
TW 1078.76 TW 1078.47 BW 1068.52 BW 1068.47 TW 1078.76 BW 1068.65
P
TW 1078.47 BW 1068.37
1067.00
M
.00
5
4.75%
1085
P
1069.00
4.00
K
BW 1069.13
1065.00
1069.92
I
1069.00
1069.92
J
BW 1069.77
1
BW 1069.77
BW 1069.53
F
BW 1069.53
DENISON AVE
K
1068.00
1069.50
1069.03 TC 1069.21 BC 1068.71
TC 1069.03 BC 1068.53
TC 1069.41 BC 1068.91
TC 1069.60 BC 1069.10
TC 1069.84 BC 1069.34
.00
1084
1069.91
EDWARDS HALL FFE 1069.94
TW 1071.27
9.00
106
1070.00
0
C
H
1069.0
106
BS - BOTTOM OF STAIR
SI - SURFACE INVERT
TW - TOP OF WALL
STORM SEWER PIPE
BW - BOTTOM OF WALL TC - TOP OF CURB BC - BOTTOM OF CURB RIM - DRAIN INLET RIM
INV 1074.79
BW 1082.00
SI
AD
BW BW 1082.00 1082.00 BW 1080.00
TC 1080.65 BC 1080.15
TC 1075.31 BC 1074.81
TC 1073.55 BC 1073.05
TC 1075.17 BC 1074.67
RIM 1075.55 INV 1074.23 AD
TC 1073.26 BC 1072.76
SI
LPS 1068.76
4.3%
9
C
8
F
B
E 7 2
A
3
1069.74
4
BW 1069.61
TW 1069.42 LP 1067.43
2.4%
TW 1069.58 BW 1067.56 TW 1069.42 BW 1067.23
HPS 1066.85
INV 1066.10
1069.61 TW 1072.
50
AD
RIM 1067.57 INV 1066.75
TC 1069.59 BC 1069.09
BW 1069.41 BW 1066.00
SI
TC 1068.42 BC 1067.92
G
B A
TC 1068.14 BC 1067.64
TC 1068.36 BC 1067.86
1066
.00
1069.78
TC 1068.14 BC 1067.64
TC 1070.25 BC 1069.75
TC 1073.11 BC 1072.61
1065.00
2%
LPS 1064.55
RIM: 1064.50 INV (in): 10xx.xx
RIM 1066.05 INV 1061.05 TC 1066.73 BC 1066.23
TC 1066.92 BC 1066.42
AD
RIM: 1065.00 1065.00 INV (out): 1059.33 INV 1059.93
.00
66
10
HPS 1073.82
INV - STORM DRAIN INVERT
TC 1069.69 BC 1069.19
AD
INV 1073.73
TC 1079.39 BC 1078.89
RIM 1069.76 INV 1067.43
TW 1068.86 TW/BW 1068.86
TC 1068.35 BC 1067.85
TC 1070.38 BC 1069.88
TC 1071.12 BC 1070.62
1069.41
1068.96
TC 1068.43 BC 1067.92
LP 1067.66
1068.35
TC 1070.76 BC 1070.26
TC 1073.54 BC 1073.04
TC 1074.94 BC 1074.44
TC 1075.53 BC 1075.03
TC 1070.62 BC 1070.12
TC 1073.18 BC 1072.68
TC 1074.39 BC 1073.89
TC 1075.23 BC 1074.73
1075.00
LP 1073.86
1067.92
RIM: 1065.30 INV (out): 1062.30 RIM: 1064.75 INV (in): 1062.08
1075.50
1064.00
KERR DR 1067
75
73 .00
.00
10
1078.00
1068.00
10
.00 1074
.00
76
10
1077.00
.00
.00
1081.00
1075.41
1079
1082.00
.00
1080.00
SLOPE %
1071.38
1075.30
1075
LPS 1075.82
2.7%
1068.93
TC 1068.60 BC 1068.10
TC 1069.95 BC 1069.45
1065.00
AD - AREA DRAIN
SI
TC 1072.37 BC 1071.87
TC 1069.59 BC 1069.09
LPS 1068.76
TC 1070.76 BC 1070.26
TC 1072.12 BC 1071.62
1067 .00
AD
TC 1071.64 BC 1071.14
TC 1071.93 BC 1071.43
1070.00
1
TS - TOP OF STAIR
LPS 1069.76
1068.96
1069.92 BW 1069.42 TC 1068.93 BC 1068.43
TC 1068.75 BC 1068.25
0
LPS - LOW POINT SWALE
SWALE FLOW LINE
TC 1072.44 BC 1071.94
AD
1068.0
PROPOSED CONTOURS
2.2%
TC 1069.62 BC 1069.12 RIM 1069.73 INV 1067.94
AD
1069.00
HPS - HIGH POINT SWALE
1.5%
TC 1069.70 BC 1069.30
TC 1071.31 BC 1070.81
10
72
.00
1070.00
EXISTING CONTOURS
TC 1071.50 BC 1071.00
TC 1071.77 BC 1071.27
TC 1071.95 BC 1071.45 RIM 1070.57 INV 1069.05
TC 1072.18 BC 1071.68
TC 1072.36 BC 1071.86 3%
TW 1079.00
LP - LOW POINT
.00
1083
TW 1082.50
FFE - FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
ROAD CENTERLINE
2.9%
.00 1070
PROPERTY LINE/L.O.W
7.00
.4%
HPS 1071.00
2.9%
SLOPE %
TC 1070.00 BC 1069.50
TC 1070.29 BC 1069.79
TC 1070.47 BC 1069.97
TC 1070.69 BC 1070.29
TC 1070.88 BC 1070.38
1071.00
LEGEND
TW 1071.27
BW 1069.13
1069.27 1069.35 1069.50
1069.27 1069.35
1069.03
1069.41
HPS 1069.68
1070.58
1070.88 TC 1071.44 BC 1070.94
TC 1071.86 BC 1071.36
BW 1069.09 1069.00
J
1070.27
1071.44
1071.54 HPS 1078.81
1%
1070.02
1.5%
TC 1069.21 BC 1068.71
TC 1069.03 BC 1068.53
1069.41
1070.02
1070.27
1070.88
1071.44
TC 1069.41 BC 1068.91
E
10
TC 1069.60 BC 1069.10
TC 1069.84 BC 1069.34 HPS 1069.68
HPS 1070.58
1071.54
0
.0
85
TC 1070.02 BC 1069.52
TC 1070.29 BC 1069.79
TC 1070.46 BC 1069.96
TC 1070.79 BC 1070.29
TC 1070.97 BC 1070.47
TC 1071.15 BC 1070.65
D
TC 1071.28 BC 1070.78
10
69
.00
Final grading plan for the potential redevlopment of Edwards Hall.
Tuttle Creek State Park Manhattan, Kansas| 2018
THANK YOU John V. Kalamaja 402.983.4334 | jkalamaja@ksu.edu 1005 Rogers Drive Papillion, Nebraska 68046