Studio C process portfolio
Job Emil Gabriels & Emmanuel Alexander Cohen
1
Site Analysis //
FRANK TATE
ERC
Swanston Street
JOHN SMYTH
Legend
Building entrances
Pedestrian Circulation 1888 Existing Trees
757
Grattan St Existing site @ 1:500
N 2
Swanston Street
Site Analysis //
FRANK TATE
ERC
JOHN SMYTH
Legend
Site Gateway
Other Access points 1888 757
Grattan St Existing site @ 1:500
N 3
INITIAL PROGRAM
PROGRAM BREAK-D0WN
FUTURE PLUG INS
SERVICES REQUIREMENTS (2018)
SERVICES REQUIREMENTS (2030) RECEPTION - SERVICE IT
STAFF SPACE
FOOD COURT 8,310 m2
SHARED STUDENT UNION SPACE
COURT YARD QUEER ROOM GSA LOUNGE GRADUATE STUDENT ASSOCIATION
GSA SEMINARS
1,435 m2
STUDENT UNION (UMSU)
PRINTING - STORAGE UMSU Offices MEETING ROOM - STORAGE
GSA OFFICES LOUNGE
1,270 m2
INTERNATIONAL
UMSU MULTI PURPOSE
HEALTH SERVICE
1,050 m2
STUDENT SERVICES
OP-SHOP GSA STUDY SPACE
12,065 m2
12,065 m2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES & FACILITIES (2018) 800 m2
THEATERS
750 m
ADDITIONAL STUDENT WELFARE
ADDITIONAL STUDENT WELFARE
GALLERY
500 m2 400 m2 400 m2 245 m2
FINANCIAL AID SCHOLARSHIPS STUDENT HOUSING UNION ADVOCACY LEGAL
100 m2 100 m2 100 m2 100 m2 100 m2
FINANCIAL AID SCHOLARSHIPS STUDENT HOUSING UNION ADVOCACY LEGAL
3,095 m2
540 m2
ADDITIONAL SERVICES & FACILITIES (2018)
BOOKSHOP
BARS
5,609 m2
EMPLOYMENT CHAPLAINCY GLOBAL MOBILITY
SKILLS - S CONNECT DISABILITY
LIBRARY
+ 69.7%
2
BOOKSHOP
+ 105%
1,551 m
2
THEATERS
506 m2 + 67.5%
337 m2 258 m2
LIBRARY
BARS
+ 30%
381 m
270 m2 165m2
+ 67.5%
708 m2
337m2
2
GALLERY
12,065 m2 + 8,249 m2
3,095 m2 + 2,413 m2
3,095 m2
4
EXISTING SPACE LIMITATIONS // Heritage value of existing buildings
In 2030 Melbourne university’s student population can be expected to rapidly grow for a current 50 000 students to an estimated total of 82,250 students.
High heritage value Moderate heritage value Little or no heritage value Potential heritage value Contemporary value
This overall figure constitutes 47,150 postgraduate students and 35,000 undergraduate students.
*Data from the 2008 Daryl Jackson master plan
With just 50,000 students currently the university has programed 15,150m2 of GFA for the for the new student precinct. Biased on Student population projections by 2030... The University of Melbourne will require 25,822 m2 of GFA to support a student precinct (conservative estimate). Within the existing Student precinct there is currently 21 473 m2 of GFA. (These building are not designed with the purpose of being used as a student precinct).
1888 Building building number: 198 total room area: 3 103 m2 1908 m
2
757 Swanston
The area is 4,349 m2 short of meeting the requirements for a precinct in 2030. A solution to this issue is to perhaps reconfigure the existing typologies of the buildings with little heritage vale whilst maintaining the buildings original facades.
building number: 199 total room area (exluding ground floor): 8 537 m2 3103 m2
Existing GFA
1247 m2
7187 m2
1893 m2
Frank Tate Building building number: 189 total room area: 1 893 m2 John Smyth building number: total room area:
197 1 247 m2
Eastern Resource Centre building number: total room area (ground floor):
171 1 458 m2
Total GFA 14 888 m2
Conservative estimate of Total GFA Required (2030) Extra room required =
11,000 m2
5
Population Projections //
Student Enrolments (EFTSL)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2015 -
Total Load (EFTSL)
35,474
35,927
36,626
36,843
38,243
23 000 Postgraduate Coursework + Research Higher degree
Postgraduate 9,909 Coursework + Research Higher degree
10,590
11,511
12,845
15,718
Undergraduate 25,565
25,320
25,115
23,998
22,524
Student Enrolments (EFTSL)
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total Load (EFTSL)
32,870
33,612
34,008
33,934
34,720
Postgraduate 7,677 Coursework + Research Higher degree
8,484
8,422
8,680
9,120
Undergraduate 25,063
25,129
25,585
25,255
27 000 Undergraduate Students Projected growth: Undergraduates growing on average 2% a year and graduates by 6-8% a year
Assuming the average growth of students is 2% per year and graduates 7%.. 2020 = 31,050 Postgraduate students and 29,700 Undergraduate students
25,600
Total load: 60,750 students Student Enrolments (EFTSL)
2000
2001
2002
Total Load (EFTSL)
28,956
30,152
31,912
Postgraduate 6,145 Coursework + Research Higher degree
6,674
7,340
Undergraduate 22,811
23,502
2030 = 47,150 Postgraduate students and 35,100 Total load: 82,250 students 57% Postgraduate 43% undergraduate
24,572
Overall by 2030 the overall student population will grow significantly by 32,250 which must me accounted for in the new precinct plan! Postgraduate students will increase by 105 % and Undergraduate students by and Undergraduate by 30 %
Total Load Undergraduate
- What’s the breakdown into full-time, part-time and graduate students? - What percentage do not come on campus, and do their units online? - What services provided by the university are under the most stress due to this increase?
Postgraduate
6
HISTORICAL TRANSITION // (Site research) Foundation
Consolidation (1880 - 1900)
History
1887
1888
1853 - The Old Quadrangle. “The University of Melbourne began with an open site which had probably been a food-gathering area for the local Wurunjeri people.” Built in 1854 the Old Quadrangle is the oldest buildingatMelbourneUniversityandstillcurrentlyremainsontheuniversity’s campus.
John Smyth
Frank Tate
ERC
757
1887 - 1888 Building. “Built on land presented to the education department in 1887 for use as a teachers college, the 1888 building was planed.” The redbrick building is designed in a late-Elizabethan style. The building uses the plan of the co-educational Hometown college in London as an Architectural precedent. 1909
Early Twentieth Century (1900 - 1920)
Public Works and Private Consultants (1920 - 1945)
Challenge
Opportunity
Conservation
Unique Identity
1940
1909 - John Smyth Building. “Built to relieve accommodation pressures on the main 1888 building of the teachers college. the red-brick building is a mater-of-fact two story red-brick building that was doubled in size in 1943.”
1940 - Frank Tate Building. “Designed to serve the Melbourne teachers College, the Frank Tate Building is a striking cream-brick, glass block and flat-roofed Streamlined Moderne design.”The interior of the Frank Tate Building shows Art Deco styling and architectural details.
???
Future
1971 Master Plan And Moves to Change (1970 - 1980)
Health and High Rise (1960 - 1970)
Fast growing student populations and local real estate prices going through the roof has prompted Melbourne University to act quickly, proposing to build student accommodation on the current Union house site (beginning in 2018.) In search for a fast solution the university has chosen to relocate the existing student precinct to the south east corner of the campus
1973
1971 - The Education Resource Centre. “An example of the late 1960s fascination with the dramatic structural expression of contemporary Japanese architecture.”
1973 - School of studies in creative arts. “The form of the tan-brick building seamed to follow the ideals of the 1970 master plan. The 1970s in Melbourne were characterized by the rise of conservation and a new awareness of the natural urban environment generally.”
As it stands, the proposed site for the new student precinct has an immense varietyofdifferentbuildings,representingvariousarchitecturalstyles.Thebuildings are a representation of the university’s unique identity and are symbolic of the university’s history. With this notion the new student precinct has the opportunitytoformacontemporarylinkcombiningMelbourne’shistorywithits current needs. It is important that the University not only think about the present situation. The university need to plan for the future as the University grows, How can Melbourne University maintain a high esteem as Melbourne heads to wards becoming a megacity??
7
intent ideas //
Tin Alley
circulation
circulation
1888 building
8
Brief Analysis - Size Comparison //
9
Brief Analysis - UMSU Components // clubs and societies
volunteering programmes
communications
high traffic area
queer space
wom*n’s space meeting rooms information centre
office bearers/ student representation
international student representation
advocacy and legal
can be split
entertainment and north court
UMSU admin
arts and entertainment admin
bar / cafe AV@melbourne
parking access
union house theatre
george paton gallery and art programs
rowden white library
10
Brief Analysis - GSA Components //
research, admin & management
graduate lounge, loft, computers,private study, lockers, kitchen
co-location with UMSU
graduate groups
communications & events
reception
graduate groups
Tsubu / Lot#6
building services co-op bookshop
print room
GSA staff
GSA council
11
Underground Network
Design Concepts //
Ground Floor circulation Vertical Network
Grattan St
Proposed Site Circulation
Swanston St
?????
An interface connecting the student precinct (existing architecture)
An interface connecting the student precinct + Ground floor that speaks to the rest of the CBD
Ground floor activation - a 24 hour student precinct that engages with the Melbourne CBD
12
Site circulation development //
13
Parametric structural iterations // (discontinued)
1.
2.
3.
14
Parametric structural iterations //
4.
5.
15
Case Study Archigram Plug-in City 1964 // “Forging ahead with the building of the future, Plug-in city reworked two slightly repressed motifs to be found in modernism: those of the mega-structure and the building in becoming.” “The principle of collectivity, of inter-changeable appartments units, and the incorporation of rapid transport links.” “There was an intoxicated sense of chaos in it unshared by models so sensibly bracketed by frames, good taste, economy and spacial evenness.” “Cooks unrepentant modernism was fired by a conviction that the qualities of the everyday could be enhanced by design.” “Plug-in City was devised to prompt circulation and accelerate the city-in-flux.” “Plug-in City turned architecture inside-out to make its interior life anterior.”
Archi Gram and the Plugin City 1964
“Plug-in implied a Lego-like convenience and instantaneous gratification.” “Plug-In went against the grain of architectural training. for the ambitious architect in the late 1950s and early 1960s. For the ambitious architect in the late 1950s and early 1960s, wheather student or professional, there were few alternatives to orthodox modernism.
Archigram” Japan Edition Book, Kajima Shuppankai, 1999
Japanese Matabolist Movement // “Metabolism was a post-war Japanese architectural movement that fused ideas about architectural megastructures with those of organic biological growth.” “The metabolists claimed that their building was the only solution to building a Japanese economy in rapid development.” “Metabolism is the name of the group, in which each member proposes further designs of our coming world through his concrete designs and illustrations. We regard human society as a vital process - a continuous development from atom to nebula. The reason why we use such a biological word, metabolism, is that we believe design and technology should be a denotation of human society. We are not going to accept metabolism as a natural process, but try to encourage active metabolic development of our society through our proposals.”
Kurokawa, Kisho - Nakagin Capsule Tower, Tokyo, Japon, 1972
16
Concept exploriation - Sections //
17
Those who arrive at Thekla can see little of the city,
And if asked whether they fear that, once the scaffoldings are removed, the city may begin to crumble and fall to pieces, they add hastily, in a whisper...
beyond the plank fences, the sackclotch screens, the scaffoldings, the metal armatures,
“Not only the city.”
the wooden catwalks hanging from ropes or supported by sawhorses, the ladders, the trestles. If you ask, “Why is Thekla’s constuction taking such a long time?” the inhabitants continue hoisting sacks, lowering leaded strings, moving long brushes up and down, as they answer,
If dissatisfiffiied with the answers, someone puts his eye to a crack in a fence, he sees cranes pulling up other cranes, scaffoldings that embrace other scaffoldings, beams that prop up other beams.
“So that its destruction cannot begin.”
18
“What meaning does your construction have?” he asks.
Architecture as Memory Studio 2015 //
“What is the aim of a city under construction unless it is a city?” “Where is the plan you are following, the blue-print?”
The University of Melbourne faces being ‘left behind’ an ever growing city. The services that the university provides for the students and the way it interacts with the broader city must be critically assessed and modified in order to maintain relevant. A new student precinct for the university must maintain Melbourne’s high esteem and endeavour to become part of the urban mesh. This allows the university as a whole to stay relevant as Melbourne grows and its identity will shift towards a more dynamic representation. Through incorporating a more diverse range of services, it is our goal to activate the university around the clock. Through an evaluation of projected number of future students, we can assess the brief requirements given to us by the University of Melbourne Student Union (UMSU) and Graduate Student Association (GSA). Are the requirements realistic? It is our understanding that the brief does not provide enough space for the large increase in student numbers, and we will adjust for this in our project. Whilst it is hard to predict the future of technology, the notion of a plug-in lifestyle is becoming more and more prominent. Visual media is fundamental to the student experience, and will undoubtedly become more involved. Setting up a framework to which updating technology can be ‘applied’ is at the core of our approach tho this project.
“we will show it to you as soon as the working day is over; we cannot interrupt our work now,” they answer.
The available land in the city centre is forever diminishing, thus it is important to implement a vertical growth. A multitude of levels creating a robust 3-dimensional network allows for future growth and change of the university. It sets up a framework to which functions can be added to sustain the growth in student numbers that are to be expected over the next few decades. Creating linkages between a collective of buildings from different historical contexts whilst maintaining the original streetscapes can be an interesting way to bring unity in the chosen site. The building’s functions are changing, and thus the interiors need to be radically rethought. However through maintain the existing skin, a homage is created. This bridges the idea of old and new, without imposing old traditions and ideals onto future occupants. The image of the university and the student services must not be overbearing. It must find a balanced spot amongst the greater city network to grow.
Emmanuel Cohen // Job Gabriels
Work stops at sunset. Darkness falls over the building site. The sky is fiffiilled with stars. “there is the blue-print,” they say.
19
Site super structure proposal //
1:500
2018 site section
1:500
2018 site section
20
‘Every Generation Builds Their Own City’ //
- vertical growth - density - repurposing the old - adaptability - network
?
2075
2030
1970
1888
21
Program distribution - Plan //
22
Existing building alterations - 757 Swanston //
23
Concept vignettes //
757 Entrance / cubic volumes
ERC entrance perspective
John Smyth building roof top
24
Site atmospheric vignettes (further development) //
Circulation
Atmosphere
Activation
25
Volume atmospheric vignettes //
Creativity
Fabrication
Growth
26
Site atmospheric vignettes //
growth
fabrication
Network network
Enlivening enlivening
creativity
Robust robust
27
Design diagrams //
AD
F F O A S G R A
N I OH
C R
E EC
PT
A
L
D E E R C A A H P S S
A
F
E
B
SP S EA C E SERVI RV CE IC S ES
E
SU U MO D FO
C N A D M R R A O Y F T R R E U P O C
IC
E
M AD IN STMIN STUD UDY CE S F I I L AT U DE N T DM E OF TA N O PE IN T RE N
L
C O
OP
T
-
E
S
R
IL C TA NT ERC R EF R O E RC + E ER OD AT FOTIV AC
U
D
Y
SH
S
OP
CA PA
C
FE
CA
FE
BO
OK
E
RE
TA
IL
Exploded isometric drawing program allocation existing buildings
FRANK TATE - BAR 280 m2 - CAFE 450 m2 - RECEPTION 450 m2 - ADDITIONAL 900 m2 JOHN SMYTE - GSA OFFICE 600 m2 - UMSU OFFICE 600 m2 - FOOD+RETAIL 400 m2 757 SWANSTON - GSA OFFICE 1350 m2 - UMSU OFFICE 1350 m2 - RETAIL + CO OP BOOKSTORE 830 m2 - CAFE 170 m2 - OPEN 300 m2 1888 BUILDING - CAFE 470 m2 - TSUBU/BAR 220 m2 - RETAIL + OPSHOP 500 m2 - STUDY SPACE 970 m2 ERC BUILDING - FOOD + RETAIL 1200 m2
Program allocation
28
AD
F F O A S G R A C
N I OH
C RE
T EP
A
L
D E E R C A A H P S S
A
F
E
B
SP S EA C E SERVI RV CE IC S ES
E
SU U MO D FO
C N A D M R R A O Y F T R R E U P O C
IC
E
M AD IN STMIN STUD U Y CE ST DE I F IL A UD NT D E OF TA OP MI NT E R ENN
L
C O
CA
OP
T
-
E
S
R
L C AI NT T ERC R EF R O E RC + E ER OD AT network FOTIV C A
U
D
Y
SH
S
OP
CA PA
C
E
R
A ET
IL
FE
FE
BO
OK
enlivening
robust
program allocation existing buildings
FRANK TATE - BAR 280 m2 - CAFE 450 m2 - RECEPTION 450 m2 - ADDITIONAL 900 m2 JOHN SMYTE - GSA OFFICE 600 m2 - UMSU OFFICE 600 m2 - FOOD+RETAIL 400 m2 757 SWANSTON - GSA OFFICE 1350 m2 - UMSU OFFICE 1350 m2 - RETAIL + CO OP BOOKSTORE 830 m2 - CAFE 170 m2 - OPEN 300 m2 1888 BUILDING - CAFE 470 m2 - TSUBU/BAR 220 m2 - RETAIL + OPSHOP 500 m2 - STUDY SPACE 970 m2 ERC BUILDING - FOOD + RETAIL 1200 m2 TOTAL: 11 000 m2
Proposed site section
site section
29
Design intent (Updated) // Narrative In a not so distant future the University of Melbourne has outgrown its once-optimistic South East student precinct. The enjoyment of the student precinct is shortly lived with the realization that the existing buildings can no longer sustain the campus needs. The University finds itself in a state of crisis trying to house a rapidly expanding student population within its precinct whilst maintaining a high esteem. On a macro scale The City of Melbourne’s deregulated planning approval permits and booming construction industry has resulted in exponential growth and hi-rise density surrounding the Parkville campus. The university finds itself more detached from the greater Melbourne CBD then ever in its long history. Is it possible to insert a new model for a student precinct that addresses the rapid increase of students? Is it possible for the university and student precinct to match the growth and density of the city? Design Intent As a research initiative our design aims to respond to some of the issues that the UOM may face in the not so distant future. By testing the potential of the site we better prepare ourselves for the scenarios that may unfold in the future. As a case study, the design will respond and critique the philosophies of the ‘Metabolist Movement’ and ‘Archigram Plug in city’. Vertical circulation a lifespan that matches growth of the city and a program driven by flexibility are influential qualities of the Metabolists seen as forward thinking at the time both offer insight into futurist thinking. Little flexibility, fixed overall appearance, lack of identity and issuers with what was proposed in relation to matured technologies at the time are critiques of the Metabolists that can be addressed in our design. ArchiGram’s new models for living, creativity, insight into space, futuristic nature and use of order are design qualities that we would like to influence a student precinct tailored for the future. We aim to investigate how characteristics from the Metabolists and Archigram may be suited to the context of current urban design and architecture. In our design we will look into the potential of super materials, combing architecture and modern technology, Organic permeable structures, biomimicry in architecture and injecting a sense of community into our proposed student city.
30
Rationalisation of new built form //
Programmatic circulation
Existing building typologies
Ground floor preservation
31
Concept form finding iterations //
+
Existing site
+
New built form rationalised by existing building typologies
New built form rationalised by site circulation
=
rationalised circulation + new building typologies
32
Material exploration //
epoxies
thermosetting
plexiglass is solid and glass-like whilst maintaining strong physical properties, an ideal choice for organic architectural applications such as skylights, windows, signage, and exterior cladding components.
melamines
- Plastics can be molded to suit form much more easily, and the cost of production for such elements is considerably less than if glass was used.
polyurethanes silicones
plastics
- Colour dyes can be added during the production process to create subtle hues in the plexiglass. Opaque plexiglass can also be achieved.
PVC
thermoplastic
nylon
perspex
polymethyl methacrylate
plexiglass
vinyls
However there are large environmental concerns associated with plastics. The use of petroleum as the key ingredient for plastic production is unsustainable. Production also releases large amounts of toxic pollutants and the disposal of by-products end up in landfill.
lucite
Our project builds on the potential for methane sourced carbon as the buildingblocksforanenvironmentallysustainableplexiglassproduction.
polystyrens
BMW Bubble, Frankfurt
Laban Dance Theatre, London
50 Argo Street, Melbourne
Kunsthaus, Graz
33
Flexible space exploration //
34
35
Design Rules - 2030 Studnet Precinct
Structure is visible externally
Multiple entry points
Level three height limit
Forms must have flexible programmatic functions All forms have natural light Organic shape
20 structural members in the U and V direction
A mixture of open and closed and space Each form is visible from ground floor
Vertical circulation
Passive design intent No corners, seamless design
Minimal appearance
Machine aesthetic
36
Further design development //
Isometric views over site
37
38
Design intent // Narrative In a not so distant future the University of Melbourne has outgrown its once-optimistic South East student precinct. The enjoyment of the student precinct is shortly lived with the realization that the existing buildings can no longer sustain the campus needs. The University finds itself in a state of crisis trying to house a rapidly expanding student population within its precinct whilst maintaining a high esteem. On a macro scale The City of Melbourne’s deregulated planning approval permits and booming construction industry has resulted in exponential growth and hi-rise density surrounding the Parkville campus. The university finds itself more detached from the greater Melbourne CBD then ever in its long history.
Critical Design Rules of Additional Space
Is it possible for the university and student precinct to match the growth and density of the city?
- One main volume placed ontop of the existing buildings - The volume must attach itself and become intergrated with the existing buildings - The additional circulation becomes part of the volume - All additions to use the same materials and structural technique - 3 storey height limit (?)
Design Intent
Programmatic Rules
Is it possible to insert a new model for a student precinct that addresses the rapid increase of students?
Our design aims to respond to some of the issues that the University of Melbourne may face in the future, using the year 2030 as a guideline. Although we speculate as to what university life is like in the future, we have tested various approaches to provide additional space to the student precinct. We have approached this project through drawing on two main schools of thought. We explore and attempt to update some key concepts of the Metabolism Movement and and Archigram futurist projects to this site and time. Through the addition of vertical circulation and the densitification of the site we provide much needed space for the program. Such volumes should have a noticeably different aesthetic to reflect the time and context. Through embracing new techniques rather than masking the built form we want to create a unique student precinct with the characteristics it deserves.
- Activation of North facing facade - Mixture of open and closed space - Flexibility of space, expand the notion of ‘open space is best space’
Aesthetic Rules - Machine-like aesthetic, the structure is visible from the outside - Minimal and light choice of material so that the additional volume does not become overbearing - Varying levels of skin transparency so that some program is visible to other areas of the site
We provide more area per program as we feel that the current requirements may be insufficient for our 2030 guideline. Through focusing on the flexibility of space we aim to provide a framework to which changing program can be applied to. This allows the student precinct to maintain relevancy as time goes on. In our design we will look into the potential of super materials, combing architecture and modern technology, and injecting a sense of community into our proposed student city.
39
40
120m2 300m2 300m2 120m2
- Clubs, Office and Lockers
400m2
- Rowden White Library ? - Theatres ?
400m2 750m2
BS U CL
L SH O A U R N E G D E ?
PROGRAM FOR THE VOLUME - Circulation / shared open space - Graduate Student Lounge - Graduate Casual Study Space - Graduate Silent Study Space - Graduate Computer Labs
S GS P A A C S E T
U
D
Y
Updayed program //
P E R
AD
F
M AD IN STMIN STUD Y S S UD O MI L M T U E N O P DE T R TA OP RO NT RE EN O M
O
F F O A S
U R
G
O T
F C
A
L
L
?
IL T C A T N ERC E R FRO R E C + E R D E O AT FOTIV AC
U
OP
-
M
S
U
SH
O
OP
CA F
F
IC
D
A
R
P
D E E R C A A H P S S
R
E C E
ON I T H
A
SP S EA C E SERVI RV CE IC S ES
Y
E
C
?
E
R
C
A
N
B
A
IC
M
E
R
F
P M D OO
FE
CA
FE
O BO
K
E
RE
I TA
L
program allocation 12-5-15
41
Further critical site analysis //
Existing infrastructure analysis
Current site circulation Disconnected tram stop Dark shallow floor plates
Unactivated ground floor
Difficult transportation access Unaccessible spaces Absent building connections
Current site infrastructure Minimal interaction with Grattan + Swanston St
Congested linkages
Dark south facing buildings
Ground floor circulation
42
Further design development //
Legend 1. Re-located tram stop 2. Rooftop performance area 3. Street Shelter canopy 4. Frank Tate roof top access
Grattan St
4.
2. 3. Swanston St 1.
Proposed site @
N 43
Initial design sketches //
Internal / external thresholds
Frank Tate roof top stairs
Swanston street shelter
44
Further design development //
Swanston Street perspective
Frank Tate Erc connection
45
Further design development //
Frank Tate roof top connection
John Smyth Perspective - integrating existing built fabric with new form
46
Further design development //
Frank Tate roof top space
Main volume interior
John Smyth interior
47
Further design development //
Proposed site Isometric
Proposed site section
1:500 48
Further design development //
Proposed site Isometric
Proposed site section
49
Proposed site isometric
50
Proposed site section
51
Further design development //
Inside volume perspective
Swanston street perspective
52