new ideas: new firms university of maine at augusta department of architecture fall 2011 lecture series October 20, 2011
Jones Architecture 10 Derby Square Salem, MA 01970 O: 978.744.5200 W: www.jonesarch.com B: www.jonesarch.squarespace.com
Support our clients in the broadest sense as they seek to shape their environment.
Context 1988/93 1993/94 1994/96 1996/97
B.Arch, University of Kentucky Practice: Switzerland, Virginia M.Arch, Harvard GSD William Rawn Associates
1997 1998/99
Independent Consulting, USVI Kao Design Group
2000/11
Perry Dean Rogers | Partners Architects
What is the impetus for starting a new firm given the economic climate? What are the goals and aspirations of Jones Architecture?
Impetus Divergence: Mission
Support our clients in the broadest sense as they seek to shape their environment.
Impetus Divergence: Mission
Impetus Divergence: Approach
Impetus Divergence: Approach
Impetus Divergence: Project Type
Impetus Divergence: Project Type
Impetus Divergence: Sustainability
Impetus Divergence: Overhead
Impetus Divergence: Lifestyle
Impetus Divergence Mission Approach Project Type Sustainability Overhead Lifestyle
What separates Jones Architecture from others?
Getting Separation Brand
Horne Visual Media w/ Timm Fair, Graphic Designer
Getting Separation Brand
Horne Visual Media w/ Timm Fair, Graphic Designer
Getting Separation Know Your Market
Horne Visual Media w/ Timm Fair, Graphic Designer
Getting Separation Know Your Market
Horne Visual Media w/ Timm Fair, Graphic Designer
Getting Separation Know Your Market Today Aspirational, 5 years Aspirational, 10 years Aspirational, 25 years
Horne Visual Media w/ Timm Fair, Graphic Designer
Getting Separation Know Yourself
... responsive to context, defined in both generic and specific terms ...
... ethical obligation to create solutions that leave the lightest possible imprint on the environment... ... design is arrived at through consensus building ...
Getting Separation Transparency
Getting Separation Transparency
Getting Separation Sustainability
Getting Separation Stewardship
Norwich University
2004
2007
2009
2010
2011
2011
2004
2008
2010
University of Arkansas
How does one judge success in the everchanging 21st century design environment?
Success Traditional Metrics Awards. Publication. Design Reputation. Firm Size. Profitability.
Success My Metrics Truth to mission. Stewardship of place. Repeat clients. Measured growth. Profitability.
Design Excellence will be a natural outcome of these metrics.
Well Rick, that’s all great, but how does this manifest itself in your Architecture? Case Study: Norwich University, Academic Building
Campus
Design Criteria
Design Criteria
Goals and Mission / Inside-Out
Goals and Mission / Outside-In
• Improved Instructional Space • Case Study Rooms • Physical Manifestation of Collaboration • Complement 25-30p classrooms w/ 60-90p case study and lecture halls as well as 15p seminar rooms • Flexibility in the learning environment; short and longterm • Refurbish Dole Auditorium to be current with standard performance venues. • Support Students and Faculty • Formal and informal meeting spaces for students and faculty • Dedicated space for students to transition from military to academic life
• Increased Visibility • Departmental Identity • Connecting to VT Industry • Outreach to Community • Stitch the campus together • Revitalized Webb joins multiple campus elevations, from multiple directions • Reinforce existing campus circulation networks
Program Overview Classrooms
Program Overview Lab/Other
Program Overview Offices
Program Adjacency
Learning Space Types Lecture Hall
F.W. Olin College of Engineering
Capacity: 100+ SF/person: 18-20
Lecture Hall
Georgia Institute of Technology
Capacity: 100+ SF/person: 22-25
Case Study Room
Harvard Business School
Capacity: 40-100 SF/person: 25-30
SCALE UP
M.I.T. TEAL Lab
Capacity: 60-100 SF/person: 25-30
Computer Lab
University of Arkansas
Capacity: 24-32 SF/person: 22-25
Flexible Classroom
College of Wooster
Capacity: 24-32 SF/person: 22-25
Learning Space Types Seminar Room
University of Arkansas
Capacity: 12-24 SF/person: 27-33
Group Study
Daemen College
Capacity: 4-6 SF/person: 30-35
Information Commons
Clark University
Capacity: Varies SF/person: Varies
Study Carrel
Clark University
Capacity: 1-2 SF/person: 40-60
Open Study
Daemen College
Capacity:1-4 per workstation SF/person: 40-80
‘Bullpen’
University of Arkansas
Capacity: Varies SF/person: 40-80
Challenges Circulation/Access Points/Elevations 808 B: 810’-0” G: 825’-0” 1: 840’-0” 2: 854’-0” 3: 868’-0”
853
828 G: 828’-8” 1: 838’-6”/840’-0” 2: 851’-4” 3: 862’-8”
840
Challenges Circulation/Access Points/Elevations
868 862’-8” 851’-4” 840’-0” 828’-8”
854 840 825 810
Schemes
Program Concept Like Grouped with Like / All Programs Face Internal Core
FTE COMP. LAB
CASE STUDY
FTE COMP. LAB
CASE STUDY
FTE CLASSRMS
CASE STUDY WEBB
CLASSRMS
CASE STUDY
B&M LABS LECTURE HALL
Circulation Concept Sculptural Internal Core / Circulation Paired with Program
UPPER STAIR PAIRED WITH ENTRY FROM WEBB (840’-0”) LOWER STAIR PAIRED WITH ENTRY FROM NORTH (808’-0”)
ENTRY
ENTRY
Internal Space Concept Light From Above / Social Spaces Clustered NORTH LIGHT
MTG / STUDY ROOMS
MTG / STUDY ROOMS
Scheme 1 > Scheme 2
Scheme 2 - SECTION Webb / Plaza / Addition
886
874
872
FTE
858
FTE
CLASS
842
FTE
CLASS LANG
826 810
CLASS
lounge
100p
PLAZA
CLASS
CLASS
862-8
CLASS
CLASS
851-4
CLASS
CLASS
840
CLASS
CLASS
828’-8
Scheme 2 - SECTION Dole Auditorium
MECH’L
886 872
FTE
CYBER
858
FTE
SERVER DOLE
842 826 810
874
836
Comp Lab
CLASS
862-8
Comp Lab
CLASS
851-4
MECH’L
entry
840
sto
828’-8
Scheme 2 - SOLAR ANALYSIS At Least 50% of Courtyard in Sun At Least 90% of South Facade in Sun JAN 21
8 AM
10 AM
12 PM
2 PM
4 PM
6 PM
FEB 21
MAR 21
APR 21
SEPT 21
OCT 21
NOV 21
DEC 21
Scheme 2 - SOLAR ANALYSIS At Least 90% of Facade in Sun JAN 21
10 AM
12 PM
2 PM
FEB 21
OCT 21
NOV 21
DEC 21
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Circulation Typology
1
2
Atrium (Addition) & double-loaded corridor (Webb)
Double-loaded corridor (Addition & Webb)
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Programmatic Efficiency
1
2
Generous circulation = less space for program
Efficient circulation = more space for program
51%
58%
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Social Spaces
1
2
Clustered around atrium
Dispersed along corridor
All levels
All levels
First Level only
First Level only
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Connection between Webb & Addition
1
2
• Connection at every level • Shorter distance
• Connection at entry level only • Longer distance
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Outdoor Space
1
2
None integral to building
Exterior courtyard at entry level
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Daylight, Views & Natural Ventilation
1
2
Minimized perimeter = daylight, views Maximized perimeter = daylight, and natural ventilation do not reach views and natural ventilation reach all all interior spaces interior spaces
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Mechanical Ventilation
1
2
• Dole Auditorium, Case Study Rooms, Computer Labs, and other internalized elements • Mechanically venilated spaces are spread throughout plan
• Dole Auditorium, Case Study Rooms, Computer Labs • Mechanically ventilated spaces are consolidated in plan
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Fireproofing
• Fireproofing and smoke exhaust • Extents of fireproofing in Addition required in all spaces contiguous with to be determined atrium • Fireproofing not required in Webb • Fireproofing required in Webb Fireproofing Smoke Exhaust
Scheme 1 vs. Scheme 2 Phasing
1
2
Maximized connection = Webb should Minimized connection = Webb may be not be used during construction used during construction
Full Composition Dewey and Ainsworth Halls
Michelle Crowley Landscape Architecture
Before and After Dewey Hall
Before and After Dewey Hall
First Floor
Third Floor
Before and After Dewey Hall
North Elevation
Before and After Dewey Hall
North Elevation Study
Before and After Dewey Hall
A A B C A North Elevation Study
B
A
Before and After Dewey Hall
A
A A A A
South Elevation Study
Before Dewey Hall
After Dewey Hall
Before Dewey Hall
After Dewey Hall
Full Composition Stewardship
Success My Metrics Truth to mission. Stewardship of place. Repeat clients. Measured growth. Profitability.
Design Excellence will be a natural outcome of these metrics.