Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Architecture ARCH 573 Integrative Design Studio, Fall 2013 Michael Kyong-il Kim, Ph.D., AIA, NCARB Professor of Architecture With Teaching Office HDR, Inc. and Gensler

Final Design Review

The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

355 East Erie, Chicago, Illinois December 6, 2013

Student Team: Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

Table of Contents

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

1

Acknowledgement

Page 3

2

Introduction

Page 4

3

Project Goals and Design Objectives

Page 5

4

Context Analysis and Design Implications

Page 8

5

Site and Meronic Design Implications

Page 14

6

Major Functional Units and Relationships

Page 16

7

Space Organizational Concept

Page 17

8

Site Plan

Page 22

9

Elevator Riser Diagram

Page 26

10

Floor Plans

Page 27

11

Building Sections and Elevations

Page 36

12

Building Images

Page 40

13

Enclosure System

Page 52

14

Structural System

Page 56

15

Mechanical System

Page 62

16

Area Tabulation

Page 69

Appendix A

Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting

Page 71

Appendix B

References

Page 76

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

2

Acknowledgement We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Michael Kim for his continuous support and guidance throughout the semester. Without his patience, passion, and immense knowledge it would not have been possible to complete the project.

We are also very thankful to the distinguished firms of HDR, Inc. and Gensler for serving as our teaching offices.

We appreciate the time and effort they have committed to advancing architectural education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

This project has taught us many valuable lessons about the comprehensive design and the integrated practice of architecture. We thoroughly enjoy the learning experience, and feel more prepared for future challenges in the profession.

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

3

2 Introduction The purpose of ARCH 573 Comprehensive Integrative Design studio is to focus on creating maximum value under the realistic temporal, technical, legal, and budgetary limitations. Using the new Ability Institute of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC), designed by HDR and Gensler, as a teaching project, our team learn about the integration of building system, functionality, and aesthetics.

The state-of-the-art RIC facility will represent a new form of healthcare delivery, which embraces the philosophy of creating ability. It will be a place where people, not patients, regain ability. It will also be a place of collaboration for multiple disciplines, and support the concept of translational medicine where clinical care, physicians, researchers, and students coming together.

Our team began the design process with defining the project goals and design objectives, which became the guiding principles throughout the development of the project. Contextual analysis of the site such as the socioeconomic condition of the neighborhood were explored to help us recognize the meronic value of the design.

Since mid-review, our team focused on further enhancing the meronic quality of the design, to better engage the pedestrian and the community, and ensuring continuity of experience from ground level to the upper floors.

Landscape and interior design were also examined to enhance the brand of the RIC.

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

4

3 Project Goals and Design Objectives Institutional Mission/Vision

To Improve Human Life through research, patient care, and education RIC Mission and Vision The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) is dedicated to providing the highest-quality patient care through integrated research, scientific discovery, and education for the purpose of maximizing the recovery of the individuals in our care.

To Advance Human Ability.

RIC will serve as the world’s leading scientific hospital for the innovation and application of new and more promising treatments that improve and eliminate the effects of injury, disease and debilitating health conditions.

1

(Adapted from the RIC’s institutional mission and vision statements)

Project Goal: Functional Utility

To Enhance The Rehabilitation and Healing Process To Facilitate Advancement of Research, Education, And Clinical Care Sub Goal: Functional Efficiency • • • • • •

To provide personalized care by bringing rehabilitation and clinical care to patients To promote collaboration among departments To design flexible and adaptable rooms To meet the patient needs who might have physical and cognitive challenges To create a total space for research and rehabilitation activities To encourage the team work and community support

Sub Goal: Environmental Comfort • • • •

To provide green spaces to assist with physical and psychological recovery To facilitate a low-stress environment through aesthetics To maximize daylighting To provide controllable lighting and shading devices

Sub Goal: Safety and Protection • • • •

To respect patient privacy through spatial organization To reduce hospital acquired infections To prevent patient falls To designate controlled entry points

Sub Goal: Usability • • •

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

To ensure easy wayfinding so it is intuitive for patients, family, and staff To provide clarity in circulation and destination points To create ease of movement throughout the facility

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

5

3 Project Goals and Design Objectives

2

Project Goal: Aesthetic Value

To Enhance The RIC’s Image As A World-Class Rehabilitation And Research Center To Portray the Image of Wellness Objectives • •

3

To portray the idea of innovation and technological advancement through materials, form, and massing To inject liveliness into the space such as using colors, furnishings, and finishes

Project Goal: Meronic Value

To Create A Place That Enriches The Human Spirit Objectives • • • • •

4

To activate the community through urban parks and public plazas To serve as an outreach educational center To give back to the community through green and open spaces To be a respite for the medical professionals To motivate patients and families through spaces that promote interaction

Project Goal: Constructibility

To Construct a Quality and Efficient Building Sub Goal: Economy • •

To specify local and readily available materials To design with efficient modular construction where applicable

Sub Goal: Safety • •

To use materials that are not harmful to human and the environment To ensure patient safety through building design and material selection

Sub Goal: Speed • • ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

To construct in phases for possible early occupancy To select an efficient structural and mechanical system

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

6

3 Project Goals and Design Objectives

5

Project Goal: Investment Value

To Form Strong Partnerships For Profitability To Increase The Rate of Return on Investment Objectives • • •

6

To create retail and commercial opportunities and promote healthy living, such as grocery store, cafe, and pharmacy To build a strong network with local business such as bookstore, library, museum, and local universities and enhance the research and education functions To lower long term maintenance and operational expenses

Project Goal: Social Responsiveness

To Manage Resources Responsibly Objectives • • • •

7

To provide accessible care to anyone in need, regardless of their physical or psychological abilities, race, age, gender, or socio-economic status To be self-sustain and self-sufficient in building energy use To give back to the community through returning excess energy To contribute to the global research efforts on rehabilitation

Project Goal: Preservation of Design Value

To Create Maintainability And Adaptability Objectives • • •

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

To design adaptable and flexible spaces for future changes in use To employ durable and easily replaceable materials To accommodate future expansion and program

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

7

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications

Michigan Ave. (From North)

th)

Design Implications • Ensure easy arrival experience • Entrance along McClurg should be more prominent • Convenient location for main entrance and drop-off • Consider service entrance from Erie and exit from Ontario

om Nor LSD (Fr

4.1 Site Access Diagram • Patients and visitors will be approaching from multiple directions • Highest traffic count along Lake Shore Drive • Most traffic converge at the corner of Erie and McClurg • Service vehicles will approach from the west I-90/I-94

From I-90/I-94

Project Site

Ontario Ohio

Vehicular Traffic From Lake Shore Drive South From North Michigan Avenue From South Michigan Avenue

Michigan Ave. (From South)

Truck Traffic From I-90/I-94

Traffic Count 150,000 cars/day 50,000 cars/day 10,000 cars/day

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

LSD (From South)

From Lake Shore Drive North

N

* Trucks can only access site from I-90/I-94 or from Michigan Avenue

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

8

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.2 Streeterville Neighborhood Overview • Economic boom of the 1920s - high-end shopping district, high-rise apartment buildings and luxury hotels

Dr ore ive

Design Implications • Site is located near the heart of the neighborhood and the medical campus; consider connection with the residential, medical, and the university communities

e Sh Lak

Today - hotels, restaurants, professional office centers, residential high rises, universities, medical facilities, and cultural venues Michigan Avenue

•

Streeterville Neighborhood Approxmiate Boundary

Project Site

Land Use Hotel

Illinois Street

Retail Commercial Office Mixed-Use Culture & Entertainment University Residential

N

Healthcare

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

200

500

1000

9

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.3 Socio-Cultural Context Population • Majority of the residents in Streeterville are young professionals, small households with young children •

Median income level Streeterville is relatively high compared with Chicago

•

Most residents live in multi-family (50+ units) high-rise apartment or condominium towers

Design Implications • Focus on needs of the community of young families; expectations of high quality and world-class facilities

Population Density (2010)

Average Household Size (2010)

Streeterville

Streeterville

27,265 people per mile2

1.5 people

Chicago

Chicago

11,877 people per mile2

2.6 people

Median Household Income (2010)

Families with Children (2010)

Streeterville

Streeterville

$78,043

40%

Chicago

Chicago

$46,195

21.5%

Streeterville Median Age (2010)

Families with Both Parents Working (2010)

Streeterville 97.1%

Chicago 61.1% Owners vs. Renters by Unit Type (2010)

http://www.city-data.com/neighborhood/Streeterville-Chicago-IL.html

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

10

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.3 Socio-Cultural Context • Streetville has a variety of restaurants and cafes, but only has a few services for daily necessities, e.g. grocery stores

2000 feet (about 10-minute walk)

Design Implications • Can inform the meronic value for the design

1000 feet (about 5-minute walk) 500 feet (about 2-minute walk)

ive

Michigan Avenue

Dr ore

e Sh Lak Project Site

Services Restaurants & Cafes Banks & ATMs Grocery Stores Florists & Gift Shops Salons & Spas Daycare Centers

Illinois Street

Dry Cleaners

Arts & Recreation Museums Theaters Parks

N

Playground

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

200

500

1000

11

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.4 Climatic Context Temperature • Wide Temperature Range (18-85) • Create outdoor space the is usable year-round • Control internal temperature efficiently Precipitation • Access to site during inclement weather • Efficient ways to collect and reuse rain water

90

Annual December November October September August July June May April March February January

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

0

HIGH (F)

LOW (F)

MEAN (F)

5

10

15

SNOW (IN.)

Chicago Annual Temperature

20

25

30

35

40

PRECIPITATION (IN.)

Chicago Annual Precipitation

January - March

April-June

July-September

October-November

Chicago Wind Speed and Direction ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

12

4 Context Analysis and Design Implications 4.5 Physical Context Soil • Streeterville’s soil is composed of silt and sand •

Hazardous soil has been found in a dozen Streeterville locations due to the use of radio-active chemical in the mid 1930s

•

The EPA and the City of Chicago require soil investigation if any hard surfaces such as concrete or asphalt are removed in the area

Adjacent Structures • Building materials - concrete and steel structures with glass, brick, stone, and metal exterior finishes

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

13

5 Site and Meronic Design Implications 5.1 Meronic Design Implications: Three roles of the RIC

as an innovative research center a place to collaborate and learn

•

as the community partner - a place to engage local residents through services

Residential Community

Medical Community

University Community

ive

Michigan Avenue

•

Dr ore

as the world-class rehabilitation center - a place to heal and regain ability

e Sh Lak

•

Project Site

Residential Community

Illinois Street

N 0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

200

500

1000

14

5 Site and Meronic Design Implications 5.1 Meronic Design Implications: Three roles of the RIC

To uplift spirits

To Heal Inpatient Care

To Improve Human Lives

RIC as the world-class rehabilitation center To heal and regain ability

To Care

RIC as the innovative research center

Clinical Care & Research

To care and collaborate

To Activate

RIC as the community partner

Public Amenities

To activate and engage To enrich everyday lives

Translation To Building Mass

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

Functional Relationship

15

Inst. adv./women board, non-clinical support serv., care mgr & social workers, global patient serv., phys. practice, clinical admin., consulting phys., education/conf., IT, exec. suite

Administrative Offices

Double beds, Queen beds, King beds, Suites, Storage

Hotel Rooms

Non-Hospital MOB

Research

Pediatric services, day rehab, neuro physician, musculoskeletal physician & therapy, pain mgmt. centers, prosthetics/ orthotics & assistive tech program, wheelchair room

Outpatient Services

Brain, spinal cord, neuromusculoskeletal, obstacle course, pediatrics, non-inpatient

Ability Lab

Lobbies, life center, coffee kiosk, chapel/ spiritual care, security, volunteers

Inpatient - Public

Dietary, materials management, environmental services, medical record, pharmacy, facilities/biomed, admitting, facility shops

Inpatient - Support

Respiratory herapy, dialysis, radiology services, therapeutic recreation, pool, ADL apartment/ car transfer

Inpatient - Clinical

Low Adjacency/ No Direct Access

244 RICU beds

Moderate Adjacency/ Convenient Access

Inpatient - Stepdown Unit

Immediate Adjacency/ Direct Access

Inpatient - Care Unit

Legend

36 Pediatric, 108 brain (1-3), 72 spinal cord (1-2), 72 neuromusculoskeletal (1-2) beds

6 MAjor Functional Units and Relationships

Inpatient - Care Unit 36 Pediatric, 108 brain (1-3), 72 spinal cord (1-2), 72 neuromusculoskeletal (1-2) beds

Inpatient - Stepdown Unit 244 RICU beds

Inpatient - Clinical Respiratory herapy, dialysis, radiology services, therapeutic recreation, pool, ADL apartment/ car transfer

Inpatient - Support Dietary, materials management, environmental services, medical record, pharmacy, facilities/biomed, admitting, facility shops

Inpatient - Public Lobbies, life center, coffee kiosk, chapel/spiritual care, security, volunteers

Ability Lab Brain, spinal cord, neuromusculoskeletal, obstacle course, pediatrics, non-inpatient

Outpatient Services

Pediatric services, day rehab, neuro physician, musculoskeletal physician & therapy, pain mgmt. centers, prosthetics/orthotics & assistive tech program, wheelchair room

Research Non-Hospital MOB Hotel Rooms Double beds, Queen beds, King beds, Suites, Storage

Administrative Offices Inst. adv./women board, non-clinical support serv., care mgr & social workers, global patient serv., phys. practice, clinical admin., consulting phys., education/conf., IT, exec. suite

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

16

7 Space Organizational Concept

44 43

7.1 Vertical Stacking Diagram

42

Mechanical

Shelled Space

41 40 39

Estimated 4 Levels

Shelled Space

38

36 35

Future Expansion for Research

Inpatient - Spinal Cord 36,978 NSF

34 33 32 31 30 29

Inpatient - NMSK 36,978 NSF

Inpatient - Brain 55,467 NSF

28 27 26 25

Inpatient & Ability Lab

24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17

MOB & Outpatient

Public

15

13M 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 B

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

17,079 NSF

A.L. - Spinal Cord 11,059 NSF

A.L. - Flex A.L. - NMSK 10,071 NSF

A.L. - Brain 2 5,657 NSF

A.L. - Brain 1 10,213 NSF

A.L. - Non Inpatient 3,331 NSF

A.L. - Peds 6,694 NSF

Research Off. & Support 29,450 NSF Patient Services 19,880 NSF Outpatient Services

A.L. - Obstacle 7,964 NSF

72,410 NSF

Medical Office Building 150,000 NSF

16

14

Sky Lobby

Stepdown 6,262 NSF Inpatient Clinical 18,883 NSF Inpatient - Pediatrics

21,296 NSF

37

Neurosci. & Eng. Research

Future Expansion

Future Expansion for Ability Lab

Hotel Rooms/ Future Expansion

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

Administrative Offices 62,240 NSF Education/Conf.

Sky Lobby & Dietary Advancement Office Mechanical Staff Parking Public Parking

Public Lobby, Entrance, Retail

Mechanical

Electrical Vault 17

7 Space Organizational Concept 7.2 Building Form and Program

Mechanical Hotel & Future Expansion

To Heal

Hotel Amenities & Future Expansion

Inpatient Care

Inpatient Units Ability Lab Research

To Care

Outpatient Services

Clinical Care & Research

MOB Administration Sky Lobby

To Activate Public Amenities

Parking Public Lobby

Building Form in Mid-Review

Revised Building Form

Revised Program Stacking

Tighten mass and accentuate beacon

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

18

7 Space Organizational Concept 7.3 Functional Space Organization - Ground Floor Lobby

Non-Public

Function: • Serve as the street level pedestrian access and main reception • Serve as the drop-off point for patients arriving by private car, ambulance, medi-van or other transport • Provide a space for patients waiting for transportation • Serve as the entry point for employees arriving by private car, public transit or bicycle

Public

Erie

Parking Ramp

Staff Lobby

Cafe

Building Core Service Access

Lobby

Loading

Parking Ramp

Vehicular Traffic

Patient Drop-off

Outdoor Space

Retail

Patient and Visitor Vehicles Service Vehicles

Pedestrian Traffic

Ontario

Patient and Visitor Staff 00 Ground Floor Lobby ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

19

7 Space Organizational Concept Best View to Lake Michigan

7.3 Functional Space Organization - Sky Lobby Function: • The formal reception of patients and visitors coming to the inpatient floors, MOB, Ability Labs, research, outpatient clinics, obstacle course, etc.

• Include an information/greeter desk and security • Provide access to Life Center, Volunteers, and access to outdoor spaces

Cafe Dietary

Building Core

Lobby

Garden

Administrative Offices Volunteer

Chapel

Life Center

Circulation Patient and Visitor Staff 13 Sky Lobby

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

20

7 Space Organizational Concept Best View to Lake Michigan

7.3 Functional Space Organization - Typical Inpatient Floor

Family

Patient Room

Family

Ability Lab

Arrival Patient Room

Function • Provide care for adult and pediatric patients requiring admission for rehabilitation of acute and/or chronic illness, and participate in therapy • A therapy- driven team approach to care/treatment • Patients will spend most of their day involved in therapy either in their room, in the Ability Lab or in the community

Nurse Station & Staff

Building Core Research

Arrival Activity Family

Patient Room

Family

Patient Room

Family

Circulation Patient and Visitor 23 - 36 Inpatient

Staff

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

21

8 Site

Lake Michigan

8.1 Site & Meronic Design Quality Legend

E. Huron Street

Anchor Points/ Destination Public Plaza Ground Lobby Building Support E. Erie Street

rive

Service

eD hor

Patients & Visitors

S ake

Overhang above

N. L

Vehicular Circulation

E. Ontario Street

Immediate Context Healthcare Office/ Retail Residential Hotel

N. McClurg Court

N. Fairbanks Court

E. Ohio Street

E. Grand Avenue

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

100

200

400

N 22

8 Site 8.2 Site & Meronic Design Quality Continuity from Ground Level to Sky Lobby

Sky Lobby

Ground Level

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

23

8 Site 8.3 Site & Meronic Design Quality - Ground Level

Small Group Lounge Seating e. O

hio

Small Group Cafe Seating Str

eet

Communal Seating Water Feature

Coffee Shop

Lobby Retail Store

e. O

nta

rio

Tone-on-tone Concrete Pavers Str

eet

Large Group Lounge Seating Small Group Seating Water Feature Communal Gathering Space ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

N 24

8 Site 8.4 Site & Meronic Design Quality - Sky Lobby

Sculpture

Small Group Lounge Seating Small Group Cafe Seating Communal Seating Water Feature

Dietary

Administrative Offices

Volunteer Lobby

Chapel LIFE Center

Sculpture

Large Group Lounge Seating

Water Feature Communal Seating

N ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

9 Elevator riser diagram Mechanical

Hotel

Service

Staff Inpatient & Ability Lab

MOB

Patient

Public Parking

Hotel

Express

Ability Lab/Clinical

RIC Expansion Floors

Outpatient

MOB

Sky Lobby & Offices

Parking

Public ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

26

10 Floor Plans B

10.1 Ground Floor (Level 1) E. Erie Street

Key 1

Public Plaza

2

Drop-off

3

Entry Vestibule

4

Retail Space

5

Lobby and Reception

6

Coffee Shop

7

Security

8

Parking Elevator Lobby

9

Staff Lobby

10

Staff Elevator Lobby

11

Loading and Sorting

1

Ramp Down to Exit

9

6

7

2

A

11

Legend

10

8

A’

5

Public & Visitor Entrance N. McClurg Court

3

Staff Entrance Parking Entrance Service Entrance One-Way Traffic

Ramp Up to Parking Floors

4

Two-Way Traffic

1

Elevators Express Public Parking Staff

B’

Service E. Ontario Street

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 27

10 Floor Plans 10.2 Public Parking Floor (Level 3) Key 1

Mechanical

2

Elevator Shaft (Express)

3

Electrical & Communication Closets

4

Storage

5

Elevator Shaft (Staff )

5

2

3

4

3

DOWN TO EXIT

4 1

Legend Down Traffic Up Traffic UP

Elevators Public Parking Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 28

10 Floor Plans 10.2 Public Parking Floor (Level 4-8) Key 1

Mechanical

2

Elevator Shaft (Express)

3

Electrical & Communication Closets

4

Storage

5

Elevator Shaft (Staff )

5 3

4

2

3 4

Legend Down Traffic Up Traffic

Elevators Public Parking Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 29

10 Floor Plans B

10.3 Sky Lobby (Level 13) Key 1

Gardens

2

Coffee Kiosk

3

Lobby and Reception

4

MOB Elevator Lobby

5

Inpatient Elevator Lobby

6

Hotel Elevator Lobby

7

Staff Elevator Lobby

8

Cafeteria

9

Outdoor Dining

10

Kitchen

11

Institutional Advancement and

Balcony Above

UP

9

Line of Ceiling Above

1

2

8

Mezzanine Above

A

A’

Women’s Board Offices 12

Outdoor Space for Staff

13

Volunteer Office

14

Chapel

15

Outdoor Meditative Space

16

LIFE Center

6

4

3

5

11

Elevators Express MOB

7

10

12

13

14

16

1

15

Balcony Above

Hotel Outpatient & Inpatient Staff

B’

Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 30

10 Floor Plans 10.4 Sky Lobby Mezzanine (Level 13M) Key 1

Lobby/ Pre-Function Space

2

Global Patient Services

3

Staff Elevator Lobby

4

Conference Center Offices

5

Outdoor Pre-Function Space

6

Conference Center

7

Staff Development & Training Center

8

Outdoor Break Space

9

Staff Development Offices

10

Security Office

Line of Garden Below

5 Open to Lobby Below

4

1

3

6

7 Elevators Express

Line of Ceiling Above

2

9

10

8

Staff Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 31

10 Floor Plans 10.5 Inpatient Floor - Pediatrics (Level 23-24) Key 1

Inpatient Elevator Lobby

2

Reception

3

Family Communal Space

4

Ability Lab

5

Outdoor Space

6

Neuroscience & Engineering Research

7

Classroom

8

Patient Room

9

Play Room

10

Inpatient Support

11

Staff Elevator Lobby

12

Ability Lab Support

Mezzanine Above

5

4

7 2 8

10

11

12 1 6

5

2

9

8

3

8

7

Elevators Future Inpatient Ability Lab/Clinical Outpatient & Inpatient Staff Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 32

10 Floor Plans B

10.6 Inpatient Floor - Typical (Level 25-36) Key 1

Inpatient Elevator Lobby

2

Reception

3

Family Communal Space

4

Ability Lab

5

Ability Lab - Research

6

Neuroscience & Engineering Research

7

Respite

8

Patient Room

9

Activity/Multipurpose Room

10

Inpatient Support

11

Staff Elevator Lobby

12

Ability Lab Support

Mezzanine Above

7

8

UP

4

3

2

A 8

10

11

UP

12

A’

5

1 6 2 9 Elevators

8

3

8

7

7

Future Inpatient Ability Lab/Clinical Outpatient & Inpatient Staff

B’

Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 33

10 Floor Plans 10.7 Hotel (Future Expansion) - Typical (Level 37-40) Key 1

Hotel Elevator Lobby

2

Lobby

3

Communal Lounge

4

Shelled Space

5

Business Lounge

6

Standard Room

7

Suite-Style Room

8

Concierge Lounge

9

Hotel Storage and Housekeeping

Mezzanine Above

5 7

DN

4

3

4

2

6 1 9

4 2

8 Elevators

7

3

6

5

5

Hotel Future Clinical Future Inpatient Future Staff Service

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 34

10 Floor Plans 10.9 Inpatient Floor - Typical Patient Room

Patient View Range

Bedside Charting

View to Exterior Primary View

View to Staff

Dry Work Zone Wet Work Zone Charting Station

Hygiene Zone Family Zone

Patient Zone

Clinical Zone

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

2

4

8

16

N 35

11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.1 East-West Section (A-A’)

44 Top of Penthouse

620’-0”

43 Rooftop/Penthouse

590’-0”

41 Mechanical

560’-0”

37 Hotel

500’-0”

34 Spinal Cord

455’-0”

31 NMSK

410’-0”

26 Brain

335’-0”

23 Pediatrics 22 Research

290’-0”

19 Outpatient

230’-0”

15 MOB 14 Administration

155’-0”

13 Sky Lobby

125’-0”

03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby

275’-0”

170’-0”

25’-0” 0’-0”

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

50

100

200

36

11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.1 North-South Section (B-B’)

44 Top of Penthouse

620’-0”

43 Rooftop/Penthouse

590’-0”

41 Mechanical

560’-0”

37 Hotel

500’-0”

34 Spinal Cord

455’-0”

31 NMSK

410’-0”

26 Brain

335’-0”

23 Pediatrics 22 Research

290’-0”

19 Outpatient

230’-0”

15 MOB 14 Administration

155’-0”

13 Sky Lobby

125’-0”

03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby

275’-0”

170’-0”

25’-0” 0’-0”

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

50

100

200

37

11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.2 Building Elevations

44 Top of Penthouse

620’-0”

43 Rooftop/Penthouse

590’-0”

41 Mechanical

560’-0”

37 Hotel

500’-0”

34 Spinal Cord

455’-0”

31 NMSK

410’-0”

26 Brain

335’-0”

23 Pediatrics 22 Research

290’-0”

19 Outpatient

230’-0”

15 MOB 14 Administration

155’-0”

13 Sky Lobby

125’-0”

03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby

275’-0”

170’-0”

25’-0” 0’-0”

East Elevation

North Elevation 0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

50

100

200

38

11 Building Sections and Elevations 11.2 Building Elevations

44 Top of Penthouse

620’-0”

43 Rooftop/Penthouse

590’-0”

41 Mechanical

560’-0”

37 Hotel

500’-0”

34 Spinal Cord

455’-0”

31 NMSK

410’-0”

26 Brain

335’-0”

23 Pediatrics 22 Research

290’-0”

19 Outpatient

230’-0”

15 MOB 14 Administration

155’-0”

13 Sky Lobby

125’-0”

03 Parking 01 Ground Lobby

275’-0”

170’-0”

25’-0” 0’-0”

South Elevation

West Elevation 0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

50

100

200

39

12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Huron and McClurg (northeast)

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

40

12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Erie and Fairbanks (northwest)

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

41

12 Building Images 12.1 Exterior - From Ontario (southeast)

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

42

12 Building Images 12.2 Exterior - Arrival Plaza

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

43

12 Building Images 12.2 Exterior - Plaza

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

44

12 Building Images 12.3 Interior - Ground Lobby

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

45

12 Building Images 12.4 Interior - Sky Lobby

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

46

12 Building Images 12.4 Interior - Sky Lobby

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

47

12 Building Images 12.5 Interior - Ability Lab

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

48

12 Building Images 12.5 Interior - Ability Lab

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

49

12 Building Images 12.6 Interior - Typical Inpatient Corridor

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

50

12 Building Images 12.7 Interior - Typical Patient Room

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

51

13 Enclosure System Aluminum panel

13.1 Enclosure Details

Fritted glass up to sill @ 3’-0” AFF Vision glass, 6’-0”H Fritted glass, 3’-0”H @ 9’-0” AFF

1

2

Aluminum panel Fritted glass Vision glass

Cable Wall

Inpatient (Brain 3)

Ability Lab (Brain 2)

Inpatient (Brain 2)

Ability Lab (Mezzanine)

Inpatient (Brain 1)

Ability Lab (Brain 1)

1) Inpatient Floors & Ability Lab Aluminum panel

3

Fritted glass up to sill @ 3’-0” AFF Vision glass, 6’-0”H

Cable Wall MOB

MOB MOB

2) MOB & Outpatient Floors Aluminum panel - embossed finish Open Parking 5 Parking 4 Parking 3 Parking 2

3) Typical Parking Floors ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

52

13 Enclosure System 

13.2 Typical Curtain Wall Section Vision Panel



Structural Silicone Joint





Fritted Insulated Glass





Curtain Wall Slab Anchor

Aluminium Panel



Extruded Horizontal Mullion



Fritted Glass Spandrel Panel

Structural Silicone Joint Black Out Screen Light Fixture Vision Panel

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

53

13 Enclosure System 13.3 Typical Curtain Wall Axonometric

Aluminium Panel

Fritted Glass Spandrel Panel

Vision Panel

Fritted Insulated Glass

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

54

13 Enclosure System 13.4 Cable Wall Detail

Button Anchor

Structural Silicone Joint

Terrazzo Tile Flooring Concrete Slab Metal Decking

Cable Guide Low Iron Glass 1� Steel Cable

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

55

14 Structural System 14.1 Structural Axon

Steel Framing: Sky Lobby (Level 11) to High Roof (Level 43)

Flat Plate Concrete Strcuture: Basement (-1 Level) to Parking (Level 10)

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

56

14 Structural System 14.2 Ground Floor Structure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

300'-0" 15'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

15'-0"

15'-0"

A

30'-0"

B

30'-0"

C

30'-0"

E

210'-0"

30'-0"

D

30'-0"

F

30'-0"

G

J

15'-0"

H

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N

57

14 Structural System 14.3 Parking Floor Structure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

300'-0" 15'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

15'-0"

15'-0"

A

30'-0"

B

30'-0"

C

30'-0"

E

210'-0"

30'-0"

D

30'-0"

F

30'-0"

G

J

15'-0"

H

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N

58

14 Structural System 14.4 Sky Lobby Mezzanine Framing

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

300'-0" 15'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

45'-0"

30'-0"

30'-0"

15'-0"

15'-0"

A

30'-0"

B

30'-0"

C

30'-0"

E

210'-0"

30'-0"

D

30'-0"

F

30'-0"

G

J

15'-0"

H

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N

59

14 Structural System 14.5 Typical Steel Framing

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

A B

C

D

E

F

G

H J

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N

60

14 Structural System 14.6 Patient Floor Framing w/ Ability Lab Mezzanine

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

A B

C

D

E

F

G

H J

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N

61

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.1 Mechanical Air Riser Diagram

44 43 42

Zone 5

FRESH AIR

Hotel

41 40 39 38

NATURAL VENTILATION

37 36 35 34

EXHAUST AIR FROM RETURN EXHAUST AIR

33 32

Zone 4

Inpatient & Ability Lab

31 30 29 28 27

SUPPLY

26 25

RETURN

24 23

EXHAUST

22

Zone 4

Outpatient

21 20 19 18

Zone 3

MOB

17 16 15 14

Zone 2

Sky Lobby

13M 13 12

Parking

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

Zone 1

Ground Lobby

1 B

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

62

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.2 Ground Floor (Level 1) E. Erie Street

SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST

N. McClurg Court

UP

UP

E. Ontario Street 0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 63

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.3 Public Parking Floor (Level 3)

SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 64

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.4 Staff Parking/ Mechanical Room (Level 9-10)

SUPPLY FRESH AIR PLENUM

RETURN

AHU for SKY LOBBY

AHU for O.P.

AHU for SKY LOBBY

EXHAUST AIR PLENUM

EXHAUST

AHU for MOB

FRESH AIR PLENUM

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 65

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.5 Sky Lobby (Level 13)

SUPPLY RETURN

UP

EXHAUST

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 66

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.6 Inpatient Floor - Typical (Level 25-36)

SUPPLY RETURN EXHAUST

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

25

50

100

N 67

15 MECHANICAL SYSTEM 15.7 Top Mechanical Floor (Level 41-42)

SUPPLY RETURN

AHU for HOTEL

AHU for INPATIENT

FRESH AIR PLENUM

AHU for HOTEL

AHU for INPATIENT

FRESH AIR PLENUM

0

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

EXHAUST AIR PLENUM

EXHAUST AIR PLENUM

EXHAUST

25

50

100

N 68

16 Area Tabulation - Departmental Summary Floor

Major Functional Areas

Basement

Electrical Vault

Level 1, 13, 13M Level 1 Level 1 Level 1 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13 Level 13M

Public

Total Departmental NSF Required

CafĂŠ (On Sky Lobby) Security Dietary

Level P11

Mechanical

Level 1, 13M, 14

Administration

Total Departmental NSF Provided

29,825 4,105

635 2,325 785 4,230

1,350 1,010 15,385

Institutional Advancement/ Women's Board

Level 13M Level 13M Level 1

Education/Conferencing Space Global Patient Services Bike Storage/Showers

Level 14

Non-Clinical Support Service

14,950

Level 14

10,720

Level 14 Level 14

Physician Practice Administration Clinical Administration Consulting Physician Space

Level 14

Medical Education/ Residents

2,255

Level 14

Information Systems/ Telecommunications Executive Suite

4,315

Level 15-18

MOB

Level 19-21

Outpatient Services

Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21

Outpatient Pediatric Day Rehab Neuro/Neuromuscular Physician Center Neuro/Neuromuscular Therapy Center Musculoskeletal Physical & Theraphy Center Center for Pain Management

Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21 Level 19-21

Prosthetics Orthotics & Assistive Tech Program Wheelchair Room

Level 19-21 Level 21

Inpatient Support

Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 21 Level 22

37,227 3,660 4,443 2,141 697 3,009 737 4,620 2,940

+25% +150%

+10% +29% -6% +9%

Research

1,000

73%

+39% -26%

2,760 1,420 15,322

62,304

+0%

74,765

21,540

Increase NSF to enhance meronic value Increase NSF to enhance meronic value

Added to program for conference and training center prefunction

Decentralize portion of the dietary program to each inpatient floor 83% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.20

16,065 1,070 700

3,390 345

4,725 150,000

150,000

0%

173,399

87%

72,410

73,600

+2%

103,040

71% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.40

21,236

+7%

29,730

71% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.40

33,969

+2%

43,820

78% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.29

8,181 7,859 9,040 11,525 12,700 8,245 11,745 3,115

7,050 3,770 1,510 5,470 2,080 33,381

Level 22

Neuroscience & Engineering Research Office

25,750

Level 22

Neuroscience & Engineering Research Office Support

3,700

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

Remarks

3,705

19,880 Material Management Environmental Service Medical Records Facilities/Biomed Admitting

Efficiency (NSF/GSF)

50,707 5,249 5,956 2,926 872 3,530 872 8,440 3,360

2,178 1,400 11,402

62,240

Level 13M

Level 14

Comparison (% Increase Total Departmental Gross Area Provided

or Decrease)

-

Ground Lobby Retail (on Ground Lobby) CafĂŠ (on Ground Lobby) Volunteer Life Center Chapel/Spiritual Care Sky Lobby Sky Lobby - Mezzanine

Level 13 Level 1 & 13 Level 13

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Department

69

16 Area Tabulation - Departmental Summary Floor

Major Functional Areas

Department

Total Departmental NSF Required

Level 22

Neuroscience & Engineering Research Research Support

2,931

Level 22

Clinical Research Office

1,000

Neuroscience & Engineering Research Center for Aphasia Other Research Related Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes & Research

Level 23-36

Inpatient Inpatient Care Pediatrics

Level 23-24

Step down RICU

Comparison (% Increase Total Departmental Gross Area Provided

Efficiency (NSF/GSF)

Remarks

or Decrease)

Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below Decentralize research space on inpatient floors 23-36. See inpatient below

-

253,982

434,838

+71%

572,507

76%

152,764 17,079

265,720 30,440

+74% +78%

352,730 42,240

75%

6,262

8,530

+36%

11,440

Increase 2450 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points

Level 26-30

Brain 1, 2, 3 (18,489 NSF per floor)

55,467

98,860

+78%

129,730

Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points

Level 31-33

Neuromusculoskeletal 1, 2 (18,489 NSF per floor)

36,978

63,945

+73%

84,660

Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points

Level 34-36

Spinal Cord 1, 2 (18,489 NSF per floor)

36,978

63,945

+73%

84,660

Increase 4500 NSF per floor for additional family amenities and destination points

Level 23-36

Ability Lab Pediatrics Obstacle Course Non-inpatient Brain Lab 1 Brain Lab 2 Neuromusculoskeletal Lab Flex Lab Spinal Cord Lab

54,989 6,694 7,964 3,331 10,213 5,657 11,059

122,889 14,512 17,760

+123% +117% +57%

162,395 22,692 22,932

17,908 18,031 18,121 18,232 18,325

+75% +219% +64% +82%

23,136 23,262 23,353 23,464 23,556

Research Neuroscience & Engineering Research Center for Aphasia Other Research Related Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes & Research

27,346 21,296

27,346

0%

29,162

94%

Inpatient Clinical

18,883

18,883

0%

28,220

67% Total department NSF provided is based on grossing factor 1.50

90,160

72%

Level 23-36

Level 25

Dialysis Radiology Services Laboratory Therapeutic Recreation Pharmacy ADL Apartment/ Car Transfers

10,071

Increase NSF to allow for flexibilty in future use Combine Obstacle Course and Non-Inpatient Ability Labs into one double-height ability lab Increase NSF to allow for flexibilty in future use Allow for flexibility in future expansion

1,105 9,783 2,885 1,125 3,535 450

Hotel

Level 37-40

Shelled

-

148,915

Level 41-42

Mechanical

-

56,440

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

76%

1,660 1,950 2,440

Level 37-40

Required Department Net Areas Provided Department Net Areas Departmental Gross Area Provided Overall Building Efficiency

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Total Departmental NSF Provided

-

64,608

621,718 877,782 1,217,108 72%

- Not included in efficiency calculations -

Excluding shelled floors

70

Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Date: Location: Time:

Friday, October 18, 2013 Room 17, Temple Buell Hall, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

Reviewers Dr. Michael Kim, AIA, NCARB Todd Eicken John Gresko Brian Vitale Scott Hurst

Professor of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Senior Vice President, HDR Senior Project Architect, HDR Design Director, Gensler Associate Project Designer, Gensler

Student Team Members Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp Summary The purpose of the Concept Design (Mid-Semester) Review on October 18, 2013 was for the student team to share their work and receive feedback from the teaching offices HDR and Gensler. The in-progress design was well received by the reviewers. Major decisions were viewed favorably, such as the vertical stacking and the Ability Lab as a prominent feature on the north-east portion of the building. The reviewers challenged the student team to further explore the meronic quality of the design to better engage the pedestrian and the community, while ensuring continuity of experience from ground level to the upper floors.

The following is a synopsis of the Concept Design (Mid-Semester) Review Meeting.

Meronic Value 1. Further develop the meronic quality, especially the research and the community components 2. Community engagement – consider something more than just retail, plaza, and amenities; suggestions: - How would you enhance pedestrian quality, through design elements such as lighting, design, colors, etc.?

- How does the building affect, touch, and engage individuals?

3. Revisit the project goals and objectives, and think about how they intersect and enhance the idea of engagement 4. Consider more possibilities and flexibilities for public engagement - Design spaces that are less specific - Leave room for imagination so users can decide how they can use the space - Connect the north and south ends of the ground lobby, and become one entity - Provide a small cafe on the north end of lobby for the medical community ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

71

Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Aesthetics 1. Enforce the brand of RIC; suggestions: - Reinforce consistent identity and continuity of experience between the ground lobby and sky lobby - Colors in interior spaces can be more provocative, bold, and daring 2. Further enhance the outdoor spaces 3. Introduce layering and sequence of space and experience 4. Develop a common vocabulary in plans to improve the spatial organization 5. Lower the ceiling height at the sky lobby reception desk (7’-0”) 6. The horizontal language is very prominent. Consider something different for the Ability Lab, e.g. weaving of horizontality and verticality 7. Consider curves in the design; curves play an important role in patient experience Functionality Ground Floor 1. Use air-lock vestibule and sliding doors on ground floor entrances, because revolving doors are challenging for people with disabilities 2. Move entrances further south to avoid traffic back-up at drop-off 3. Remove the island and columns in the drop-off zone (increase the span) 4. Layout furniture groups so they are more engaging with the lobby space Parking 5. Parking is the first experience for many building users; develop further in terms of design & aesthetics 6. Show ADA symbols in parking spots 7. Consider using 45’ bays and reduce the number of columns; avoid columns at the corners of traffic paths ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

72

Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Functionality (Continued) 8. Consider consolidating staff parking and staff elevators. Should be left for hospital management to decide?

9. 40% or more openings in garage,would eliminate the need for mechanical Mechanical 10. Consider placing the mechanical floors under the sky lobby; reasons: - Noise and vibration of the equipment from the mechanical floors can be disruptive - Separate maintenance staff from the patient/public traffic 11. Increase the number and size of air shafts (4 times) Sky Lobby 12. The stairs in the sky lobby could be viewed as an obstacle for people with disabilities; however, if stairs are placed, be sure it is monumental and become an experience for the patient (that they feel confident about walking up and down the stairs in the public space) 13. Give stronger definition to the mezzanine level - Make it an experience, more than just waiting space - Can introduce more amenities for the hotel guests, administrative offices Inpatient Floor 14. Connect circulation in elevator lobby (remove dead end) 15. Can remove charting desk outside patient room, because patients are not in acute conditions 16. Respite rooms at the ends of corridor are successful 17. Create stronger destination points on patient floors, similar to the activity room we have placed along the hallway; in addition, consider: - Introduce street experience along the corridor - Place landmarks and destination points - Use instruments of measurements, e.g. floor pattern, lighting - Create moment of respite, movement and mobility 18. Ability Lab is the heart and soul of RIC, and therefore: - Can be more distinct from the rest of the building (structural and aesthetic expression) ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

73

Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting Functionality (Continued) - Become a strong symbol of RIC - Improve the form of the Ability Lab; can be more specific to RIC’s identity and its “soul” - Refer to Ralph Johnson’s Boeing Headquarters building - Think of it as a “ beacon”, but consider from the pedestrian’s standpoint and also the city’s skyline (building is visible from the Michigan Avenue bridge) - Introduce transitional zone between patient room to the ability lab; be more gracious 19. Express strong connection with research component: - Must be planned on the patient floor also - Workspaces for the researchers at RIC are similar to our studio space, very active; researchers work long hours - Doctors work in private offices and their work hours are regular 20. Develop the roof top level with undulating landscape and garden space; not just a place for cooling tower Other Suggestions 1. Pause and slow down when renderings are shown; describe the experience as shown in the rendering 2. (For our information) Drop-off lanes need to be very spacious because patients take a lot of time to get off or board (up to 20 to 30 minutes) Next Steps - Priority 1. Explore meronic quality of the design further; look for examples of urban plaza and landscape design 2. Revisit the structural grid, reduce the number of columns and add transfer girders 3. Refine and enhance the Ability Lab form, giving it a stronger identity 4. Revise vertical stacking for mechanical and research floors 5. Strengthen inpatient floor plans with research program and refine transition to the ability lab The foregoing represents our understanding of matters discussed and conclusions reached. Other participants are requested to review these items and advise the originator in writing of any errors or omissions.

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

74

Appendix A Synopsis of Mid-Review Meeting

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

75

Appendix B References “LEED 2009 for Healthcare: New Construction and Major Renovations.”, accessed Nov. 27, 2013, http://www.usgbc.org/ resources/healthcare-v2009-checklist-xls.

“Spaulding Hospital / Perkins+Will.”, accessed Dec 2, 2013, http://www.archdaily.com/443408/spaulding-hospita-perkinswill/.

Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities 2010. 2010th ed. Chicago, IL: American Society for Healthcare Engineering of the American Hospital Association.

Allen, Edward and Joseph Iano. 2007. The Architect’s Studio Companion: Rules of Thumb for Preliminary Design. Fourth ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 1998. Americans with Disabilities Act: Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG) US Access Board.

Babyak, Maria, Aleta Budd, Cavin Costello, Christopher Crocker, Justin Dicristofalo, Christopher Godfrey, Brittany Levine, Michael Prattico, Bridgette Treado, and Joseph Yacobellis. 2008. “Parking.” Graduate Degree Project Studio, Northeastern University School of Architecture.

Ching, Francis DK. 2008. Building Construction Illustrated. Fourth ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Dishman, Lydia. 2011. The Hospital Room of the Future: Flexible, Media Rich, very Shiny.

Grondzik, Walter T., Alison G. Kwok, Benjamin Stein, and John S. Reynolds. 2011. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Hutlock, Todd. 2012. “In the City, of the City: Lurie Children’s Hospital.” Healthcare Design Magazine 12 (11): 120-129.

Kim, Michael Kyong-il. 2010. “What would You Say Now, Mr. Vitruvius? Building Design Technology, then & Now.” Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Design Education, ConnectED 2010, Jun 28 – Jul 1, 2010, Sydney, Australia.

———. 2013. “Design Reasoning: The Logic, the Structure, & Strategies.” Presented at the 3rd Annual International Conference on Architecture, Jun 10-13, 2013, Athens, Greece.

———. “Integrative Design of Buildings: Principles and Strategies, Chapter 1: Buildings and the Design Teleology.”

Neufert, Ernst and Peter Neufert. 2000. Architects’ Data, edited by Bousmaha Baiche, Nicholas Walliman. Third ed. WileyBlackwell.

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. “RIC - Advancing Human Ability (TM).”, accessed Nov, 27, 2013, http://www.ric.org/.

Walker, Carl and Timothy Haahs. 2005. “Parking Planning.” In The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, edited by The American Institute of Architects. 2006th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

ARCH 573 Fall 2013, Professor Michael Kim

Ali Momen-Heravi, David Park, Annie Sit, Jordan Tripp

76