The new horizon of spreading research
An International Research Journal for Biology May 2013
Volume 3 Issue 2
http://www.jresearchbiology.com
Aim and Scope Journal of Research in Biology is an international scientific journal committed to the development and spread of research in Biological sciences. It accepts research articles with affiliation to biological science from all around the globe and publishes them in the journal. The submitted articles are peer-reviewed by experts in the field and editorial board members. Make the most of your research by publishing articles in Journal of Research in Biology. Journal of Research in Biology works as a portal for biological scientific research publication. It works to promote the use of biological sciences knowledge in the world public policy, and to develop and advance science policy that serves the needs of scientific research and education communities, particularly the biological sciences. The journal has been uniquely positioned to help members of the scientific community; become effective advocates for their science and to be better known for the public that relate to or impact the biological sciences. Call for Papers
Journal of Research in Biology seeks Research Articles, Short Communications and Mini reviews. The Journal will accept and review submissions in English from any author, in any global locality. A body of international peers will review all submissions with potential author revisions as recommended by reviewers, with the intent to achieve published papers that: Relate to the field of Biology Represent new, previously unpublished work Advance the state of knowledge of the field Conform to a high standard of presentation.
Disclaimer: Journal of Research in Biology is not responsible for the content of individual manuscripts. Manuscripts available in this journal were peer reviewed. Manuscripts accepted in the issues conform to the editorial policies. But more details regarding the nature of their research, conflicts in their workplace, plagiarisms, stealing of others property, manipulation of data, illegal formulation of a paper from other allied papers etc., were all not known to us. Any details, queries regarding the manuscripts should be only dealt with the authors and not with the publisher. The concept of peer review can only limit the plagiarism to a small extent where as it is the work of the public and the individuals to identify and stop the illegal formulation of new articles from the other. The publisher invites all details regarding the plagiarism of an article published in the journal provided with the original data and supplementary files for confirmation. On identifying plagiarism issues in an article, the article published will be removed from the journal website and further on the citation of the same will be debarred. Provided the author of the manuscript will be prohibite d to publish his/her other studies in our journal or throughout the journals under our portal.
List of Editors of Editors in the Journal of Research in Biology Managing and Executive Editor: Abiya Chelliah [Molecular Biology] Publisher, Journal of Research in Biology. Editorial Board Members: Ciccarese [Molecular Biology] Universita di Bari, Italy. Sathishkumar [Plant Biotechnologist] Bharathiar University. SUGANTHY [Entomologist] TNAU, Coimbatore. Elanchezhyan [Agriculture, Entomology] TNAU, Tirunelveli. Syed Mohsen Hosseini [Forestry & Ecology] Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Iran. Dr. Ramesh. C. K [Plant Tissue Culture] Sahyadri Science College, Karnataka. Kamal Prasad Acharya [Conservation Biology] Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway. Dr. Ajay Singh [Zoology] Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur Dr. T. P. Mall [Ethnobotany and Plant pathoilogy] Kisan PG College, BAHRAICH Ramesh Chandra [Hydrobiology, Zoology] S.S.(P.G.)College, Shahjahanpur, India. Adarsh Pandey [Mycology and Plant Pathology] SS P.G.College, Shahjahanpur, India Hanan El-Sayed Mohamed Abd El-All Osman [Plant Ecology] Al-Azhar university, Egypt Ganga suresh [Microbiology] Sri Ram Nallamani Yadava College of Arts & Sciences, Tenkasi, India. T.P. Mall [Ethnobotany, Plant pathology] Kisan PG College,BAHRAICH, India. Mirza Hasanuzzaman [Agronomy, Weeds, Plant] Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh Mukesh Kumar Chaubey [Immunology, Zoology] Mahatma Gandhi Post Graduate College, Gorakhpur, India. N.K. Patel [Plant physiology & Ethno Botany] Sheth M.N.Science College, Patan, India. Kumudben Babulal Patel [Bird, Ecology] Gujarat, India.
Dr. Afreenish Hassan [Microbiology] Department of Pathology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Gurjit Singh [Soil Science] Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amritsar, Punjab, India. Dr. Marcela Pagano [Mycology] Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Brazil. Dr.Amit Baran Sharangi [Horticulture] BCKV (Agri University), West Bengal, INDIA. Dr. Bhargava [Melittopalynology] School of Chemical & Biotechnology, Sastra University, Tamilnadu, INDIA. Dr. Sri Lakshmi Sunitha Merla [Plant Biotechnology] Jawaharlal Technological University, Hyderabad. Dr. Mrs. Kaiser Jamil [Biotechnology] Bhagwan Mahavir Medical Research Centre, Hyderabad, India. Ahmed Mohammed El Naim [Agronomy] University of Kordofan, Elobeid-SUDAN. Dr. Zohair Rahemo [Parasitology] University of Mosul, Mosul,Iraq. Dr. Birendra Kumar [Breeding and Genetic improvement] Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, India. Dr. Sanjay M. Dave [Ornithology and Ecology] Hem. North Gujarat University, Patan. Dr. Nand Lal [Micropropagation Technology Development] C.S.J.M. University, India. Fábio M. da Costa [Biotechnology: Integrated pest control, genetics] Federal University of Rondônia, Brazil. Marcel Avramiuc [Biologist] Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania. Dr. Meera Srivastava [Hematology , Entomology] Govt. Dungar College, Bikaner. P. Gurusaravanan [Plant Biology ,Plant Biotechnology and Plant Science] School of Life Sciences, Bharathidasan University, India. Dr. Mrs Kavita Sharma [Botany] Arts and commerce girl’s college Raipur (C.G.), India. Suwattana Pruksasri [Enzyme technology, Biochemical Engineering] Silpakorn University, Thailand. Dr.Vishwas Balasaheb Sakhare [Reservoir Fisheries] Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya, Ambajogai, India.
CHANDRAMOHAN [Biochemist] College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University.
Dr. Pankaj Sah [Environmental Science, Plant Ecology] Higher College of Technology (HCT), Al-Khuwair.
B.C. Behera [Natural product and their Bioprospecting] Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, INDIA.
Dr. Erkan Kalipci [Environmental Engineering] Selcuk University, Turkey.
Kuvalekar Aniket Arun [Biotechnology] Lecturer, Pune.
Dr Gajendra Pandurang Jagtap [Plant Pathology] College of Agriculture, India.
Mohd. Kamil Usmani [Entomology, Insect taxonomy] Aligarh Muslim university, Aligarh, india.
Dr. Arun M. Chilke [Biochemistry, Enzymology, Histochemistry] Shree Shivaji Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.
Dr. Lachhman Das Singla [Veterinary Parasitology] Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Dr. AC. Tangavelou [Biodiversity, Plant Taxonomy] Bio-Science Research Foundation, India.
Vaclav Vetvicka [Immunomodulators and Breast Cancer] University of Louisville, Kentucky.
Nasroallah Moradi Kor [Animal Science] Razi University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran
José F. González-Maya [Conservation Biology] Laboratorio de ecología y conservación de fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, México.
T. Badal Singh [plant tissue culture] Panjab University, India
Dr. Kalyan Chakraborti [Agriculture, Pomology, horticulture] AICRP on Sub-Tropical Fruits, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India. Dr. Monanjali Bandyopadhyay [Farmlore, Traditional and indigenous practices, Ethno botany] V. C., Vidyasagar University, Midnapore. M.Sugumaran [Phytochemistry] Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur, Kancheepuram District. Prashanth N S [Public health, Medicine] Institute of Public Health, Bangalore. Tariq Aftab Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India. Manzoor Ahmad Shah Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India. Syampungani Stephen School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia. Iheanyi Omezuruike OKONKO Department of Biochemistry & Microbiology, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria. Sharangouda Patil Toxicology Laboratory, Bioenergetics & Environmental Sciences Division, National Institue of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (NIANP, ICAR), Adugodi, Bangalore. Jayapal Nandyal, Kurnool, Andrapradesh, India. T.S. Pathan [Aquatic toxicology and Fish biology] Department of Zoology, Kalikadevi Senior College, Shirur, India. Aparna Sarkar [Physiology and biochemistry] Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity campus, Noida, INDIA. Dr. Amit Bandyopadhyay [Sports & Exercise Physiology] Department of Physiology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, INDIA . Maruthi [Plant Biotechnology] Dept of Biotechnology, SDM College (Autonomous), Ujire Dakshina Kannada, India. Veeranna [Biotechnology] Dept of Biotechnology, SDM College (Autonomous), Ujire Dakshina Kannada, India. RAVI [Biotechnology & Bioinformatics] Department of Botany, Government Arts College, Coimbatore, India. Sadanand Mallappa Yamakanamardi [Zoology] Department of Zoology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India. Anoop Das [Ornithologist] Research Department of Zoology, MES Mampad College, Kerala, India.
Dr. Satish Ambadas Bhalerao [Environmental Botany] Wilson College, Mumbai Rafael Gomez Kosky [Plant Biotechnology] Instituto de Biotecnología de las Plantas, Universidad Central de Las Villas Eudriano Costa [Aquatic Bioecology] IOUSP - Instituto Oceanográfico da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil M. Bubesh Guptha [Wildlife Biologist] Wildlife Management Circle (WLMC), India Rajib Roychowdhury [Plant science] Centre for biotechnology visva-bharati, India. Dr. S.M.Gopinath [Environmental Biotechnology] Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore. Dr. U.S. Mahadeva Rao [Bio Chemistry] Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia. Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado [Pharmacist] Unesp - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brazil Mandava Venkata Basaveswara Rao [Chemistry] Krishna University, India. Dr. Mostafa Mohamed Rady [Agricultural Sciences] Fayoum University, Egypt. Dr. Hazim Jabbar Shah Ali [Poultry Science] College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad , Iraq. Danial Kahrizi [Plant Biotechnology, Plant Breeding,Genetics] Agronomy and Plant Breeding Dept., Razi University, Iran Dr. Houhun LI [Systematics of Microlepidoptera, Zoogeography, Coevolution, Forest protection] College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, China. María de la Concepción García Aguilar [Biology] Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada, B. C., Mexico Fernando Reboredo [Archaeobotany, Forestry, Ecophysiology] New University of Lisbon, Caparica, Portugal Dr. Pritam Chattopadhyay [Agricultural Biotech, Food Biotech, Plant Biotech] Visva-Bharati (a Central University), India
Table of Contents (Volume 3 - Issue 2)
Serial No
Accession No
1
RA0335
Title of the article Checklist of land birds in Tenkasi and Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District: at the Foot Hills of Southern Western Ghats.
Page No 797-808
Sudhakaran MR, Valliselvam K, Esakkiammal M and Jayanthi A.
2
RA0298
Heavy metal accumulation by Amaranthus hybridus L . Grown on waste dumpsites in South-Eastern Nigeria.
809-817
Uka UN, Chukwuka KS and Okorie N.
3
RA0322
Treatment of digestive tract ailments in cattle with herbal folk-medicines: A preliminary study in Ganjam District.
818-827
Dibakar Mishra.
4
RA0330
An assessment of Floristic Diversity of Daroji Sloth bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India.
828-839
Harisha MN and Hosetti BB.
5 RA0331
Butterfly fauna of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India.
840-846
Harisha MN and Hosetti BB.
6
RA0334
Toxicity of copper to tropical freshwater snail (Pila ovata). Ariole CN and Anokwuru B.
847-851
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
Checklist of land birds in Tenkasi and Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District: at the Foot Hills of Southern Western Ghats Authors: Sudhakaran MR, Valliselvam K, Esakkiammal M and Jayanthi A.
ABSTRACT:
Corresponding author: Sudhakaran MR.
Keywords: Land birds, ambasamudram, diversity.
Email: sudhakaranmr@gmail.com
Article Citation: Sudhakaran MR, Valliselvam K, Esakkiammal M and Jayanthi A. Checklist of land birds in Tenkasi and Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District: at the Foot Hills of Southern Western Ghats. Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Web Address:
Dates: Received: 07 Feb 2013
Birds present everywhere and are important ecological indicators. The study area Tenkasi (8.97°N 77.3°E) and Ambasumudram (8.7°N 77.47°E) region of Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu state is at the foothills of Southern Western Ghats. Studies on distribution of birds in this part have been recorded from the yester years but due to various reasons it had been confine towards aquatic ecosystem. To fulfill this lacuna, present study was carried out. A total of 100 species of land birds were documented that belongs to 36 orders and 48 families. Study on nesting pattern, breeding pattern Institution: was also carried out. 30% of the birds had their breeding periods during rainy season Department of Zoology, Sri Paramakalyani College, and 50% of the birds had their breeding periods during harvesting time. Insectivores Alwarkurichi 627 412 India. breeds during rainy season and granivores breeds during harvest season which supports ‘food availability-breeding time’ hypothesis.
http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0335.pdf.
Accepted: 14 Feb 2013
Published: 22 Feb 2013
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
797-808 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 area, an extensive survey was made to document the land
INTRODUCTION Diversity studies have assumed a greater
bird distribution with a note on their habitat and breeding
urgency, partially as a result of incorporating habitat and
in Ambasumudram and Tenkasi Taluk of Southern
demographic information towards conservation. Birds
Tamilnadu.
use diverse habitat and select their own habitat for successful living. Out of more than 9,000 bird species of
MATERIALS AND METHODS
the world, Indian subcontinent contains 1,300 species or
Study Area
over 13% of the world’s bird species (Grimmet et al.,
Tenkasi (8.97°N 77.3°E; Elevation 554 feet) and
1999). The study area Tenkasi and Ambasamudram
Ambasumuram (8.7°N 77.47°E; Elevation 229 feet)
region of Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu state is at the
taluk are regions of Tirunelveli district of Tamilnadu
foothill of Southern Western Ghats. This area has part of
(map) described as a microcosm of the state, owing to its
Kalakad Mundunthurai Tiger Reserve (KMTR) and
mosaic and diverse geographical and physical features
Courtallam hills, got a rich amount of flora and fauna
such as lofty mountains and low plains, thorn scrub
and a good vegetation that give food and nest resources
jungles, rivers and cascades, thick inland forest, sandy
for birds. Nearly 160 species of birds were observed to
soils and fertile alluvium, a variety of flora, fauna, and
present in KMTR (Joshua and Johnsingh, 1988). An
protected
annotated check list of the birds of Tamilnadu is not
temperature is 32.1ºC. The weather is quite hot in
available, but more than 450 species are likely to occur
May and June and the maximum temperature some
(Rathinam, 2002). Studies on distribution of birds in this
times
part have been recorded from early 1945 (Webb-Pelope,
(December to March), Summer (April-June), Southwest
1945), but the studies had limited towards wet-land
monsoon (June to September and North east monsoon
birds. It is mainly due to the climatic condition prevails
(October to November). The month of November is
in this area. This region enjoys both the north east and
generally with maximum rainfall. The average rainfall in
south west monsoon, with good wetland ecosystem that
the district is 814.8 mm per annum.
wild
reaches
life.
43ºC.
The
This
mean
region
daily
maximum
enjoys
winter
provides habitat for aquatic birds. Koonthankulam bird sanctuary is present in this region that inhabits more than 100 species of wetland birds. Hence most of the studies on
birds
(Johnson,1971;
Wilkinson,
1961;
Subramaninan, 2003; Johnsingh, 2001) were restricted towards wetland birds and their conservation. As birds are observed to be an ideal bioindicator and a useful tool for studying a variety of environmental problems, the habitat ecology of bird community should be evaluated for their conservation (Kattan and Franco, 2004). The Indian bird population has been declining due to habitat loss, fragmentation, anthropogenic disturbances that
necessitates
documentation,
monitoring
and
conservation.
Map: Study Area
In order to bring forth the avian diversity in this 798
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Survey
RESULT AND DISCUSION This study on survey of land bird was conducted
A total of 100 species of birds that belongs to
from January 2012 to December 2012 for a period of one
16 orders and 36 families were recorded during the
year. Weekly field observations were made throughout
study, of which order Passeriformes was observed to
the study period, a total of 52 observations were done
have 19 families with 48 species (Table 1). Family
during the study and birds in the study area
Sylviinae of order Passeriformes have a maximum
were documented. Survey was done in the nesting sites,
number of 8 species of total 100 species observed.
and information were gathered from local peoples and
Passeriformies are group of birds that inhabit in a
villagers. With high precise birds were monitored during
vegetative rich area, that provide nesting and feeding
morning
evening
areas (Balachandran et al., 2005). Study area was
(15 00 to 18 30 hrs). Binoculars and monoculars were
observed to provide a good resource for the bird
used for observation. Nest sites were surveyed there by
community. Of the 100 species observed, 75 were
getting information from local villagers. Birds were
observed to be residents and 16 were observed to
identified using key reference books of birds of India
migrants, and 9 were both resident and migrant. Migrants
(Salim Ali, 2002) and Tamilnadu (Rathinam, 2002).
were observed to be from the western ghats region.
(06
00
to
10
00
hrs)
and
Study
Diveristy Indices Species richness was calculated by using
on
Passeriformes
species
shows
(Dmg:
higher 1.598)
revealed
species Pirnia
that
richness.
Margalef’s index and species dominance was calculated
Passer
by using Berger-Parker index. They were calculated by
(Dmg: 1.497), Acrocephalus agricola (Dmg: 1.401),
using the formulae given below,
Orthotomus subtorius (Dmg: 1.401), Corvus splendens
Margalef’s index
(Dmg: 1.400), Dendrocitta vagabunda (Dmg: 1.399),
Species richness measures provide an instantly
domesticus
a
richness
socialis
Corvus macrorhynchos (Dmg: 1.387), Ardeola grayii
comprehensible expression of diversity. It is calculated
(Dmg:
1.350),
Egretta
grazetta
(Dmg:
1.351),
using the formula,
Cosmerodius albus (Dmg: 1.320) were observed to have
Dmg = (S – 1)/ In N
a higher species richness. Species richness depends on
Where,
the habitat, climatic condition, food resource and
S = Number of species present in each taluk
evolutionary history of the area (Jayson, 1994). On
N = Number of individuals
estimating the dominance of species Corvus splendons
Berger-Parker diversity index
(d=0.393), Acridotherse tristis (d=0.390) had a greater
Berger-Parker index is employed to determine
dominance. Dominance and richness of the species
whether there is any change in the dominance of species
depends mostly on the resource availability (Recher and
in each taluk. It expresses the proportional importance to
Davis, 2002).
the most abundant species. The formula for calculating
Considering the feeding habit of bats 37 were
the Berger-Parker index is
insectivorous, 22 were omnivores, 13 were granivore,
d = N max/N
4 were piscivores, 4 were frugivores, 7 were carnivores,
Where,
3 were predators, 1 was nectarivore, 3 were insectivore
N = the total number of individuals
and piscivore, 2 were insectivore and frugivore, 1 was
Nmax = Number of individuals in the most abundant
carnivore and frugivore, 1 was predator and insectivore,
species.
and 2 were insectivore and nectarivore. Insectivore and
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
799
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Table 1. Check list of birds in the study area S.NO
COMMON NAME
Order:Ciconiiformes Family:Ardeidae 1 Indian pond-heron 2 Little egret 3 Large egret
SCIENTIFIC NAME
VERNACULAR NAME
FEEDING HABIT
STATUS
Ardeola grayii Egretta garzetta Casmerodius albus
Curuttu kokku Chinna kokku Paria kokku
IN, P IN, P IN, P
R R RM
Amaurornis phoenicurus
Kampul koli
IN
R
Milvus migrans Haliastur indus Circus macrourus Ictinaetus malayensis Accipiter badius
Kalla parunthu Semparunthu Punai parunthu Karumparunthu Valluru
C C C C PR
R R M R R
Cowthari
GR
Katai Nila myil
GR OM
Pterocles exustus
Kalcowthari
GR
Francolinus pictus Coracias benghalensis
Varna Kowthari Panagkatai
GR IN
Vanellus indicus
Chivappumuku alkatti
CR
Columba livia Streptopelia chinensis Streptopelia tranquebarica
Madapura Pullipura
GR GR
Thavittupura
GR
Treron phoenicoptera
Pachaipura
GR
Streptopelia decaocto
Kallipura
GR
R
Psittacula krameri
Senthar pynkili
FR
R
Hierococcyx varius Cuculus micropterus Surniculus lugubris Eudynamys scolopaceus Centropus sinensis
Akka Kuyil Kuyil Karisaan Kuyil Kokilum Senbagam
IN IN IN,FR CR,FR PR
R R R R R
Order:Gruiformes Family:Rallidae 4
White-breasted waterhen
Order:Falconiformes Family:Accipitridae 5 6 7 8 9
Black kite Brahminy kite Pallied harrier Black eagle Shikra
Order:Galliformes Family:Phasianidae 10
Grey francolin
11 12
Common quail Indian pea fowl Chesnut-bellied sand grouse Painted francolin Indian Roller
13 14 15
Francolinus pondicerianus Coturnix coturnix Pavo cristatus
R R R R R R
Order:Charadriiformes Family:Charadriidae 16
Red-wattled lapuing
R
Order:Columbiformes Family:Columbidae 17 18
Blue-rock pigeon Spotted dove
19
Red collared dove
20 21
YellowLegged GreenPigeon Eurasian collared Dove
R R R R
Order:Psittaciformes Family:Psittacidae 22
Rose-ringed parakeet
Order:Cuculiformes Family:Cuculidae 23 24 25 26 27 800
Brainfever bird Indian cuckoo Drongo cuckoo Asian koel Greater coucal
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Order:Strigiformes Family:Strigidae 28 Eurasian eagle owl 29 Motted wood owl 30 Spotted owlet Family:Tytonidae 31 Barn owl
Bubo bubo Strix ocellata Athene brama
Compan anthai Poripulli owl Pulli anthai
CR PR OM
R R R
Tyto alba
Cukai anthai
OM
R
Collocalia unicolor Apus affinis Cypsiurus balasiensis
China ulavaran Nattu ulavaran Panai ulavaran
IN IN IN
R RM R
Hemiprocne coronata
Kontai ulavaran
IN
R
Alcedo atthis Ceyx erithaca Halcyon smyrnensis Jeannine miesle
Ciral menkoththi Ciru menkoththi Wenmarbu menkoththi Menkoththi
P P P P
RM R R M
Merops orientalis Merops philippinus Merops leschenaulti
Chinna panchurutan Nilaval panchurutan Chanthalai pancurutan
IN IN IN
R M R
Upupa epops
Saval kuruvi
IN,PR
RM
R R
Order:Apodiformes Family:Apodidae 32 Indian edible-nest swiftlet 33 House-swift 34 Asian plam swift Family:Hemiprocnidae 35 Creasted tree swift Order:Coraciiformes Family:Alcedinidae 36 Small blue kingfisher 37 Oriental dwarf kingfisher 38 White-breasted kingfisher 39 Wood lane Family:Meropidae 40 Small bee-eater 41 Blue tailed bee-eater 42 Chesnut-heated bee-eater Family:Upupidae 43 Hoopoe Order:Piciformes Family:Capitonidae 44
White-checked barbet
Megalaima viridis
China kukkuruvan
FR
45
Brown-headed barbet
Megalaimia zeylanica
Kattu pachai Kukkuruvan
FR
Picus chlorolophus
Marangkothi
IN,FR
Dinopium javanense
Marangkothi
CR
Chrysocolaptes lucidus
Marangkothi
IN
Family:Picidae 46 47 48
Small yellow-napal woodpecker Golden backed woodpecker Greater golden-backed woodpecker
R R R R M
49
Heart-spotted woodpecker
Hemicircus canente
Marangkothi
IN
50
Brown-capped pygmy woodpecker
Dendrocopos nanus
Marangkothi
IN
Pitta brachyura
Arumani kuruvi
IN
M
Hirundo rustica Hirundo smithii
Thagaivilan Kampi-valThagaivilan
IN IN
RM RM
Order:Passeriformes Family:Pittidae 51 Indian pitta Family:Hirundinidae 52 Common swallow 53 Wire-tailed swallow
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
801
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Family:Motacillidae 54
Large-pied wagtail
Motacilla maderaspatensis
Karuppuvalati
IN
55
Grey wagtail
Motacilla cinerea
Karum sampal valati
IN
R M
Family:Campephagidae 56
Large cuckoo-Shrike
Coracina macei
Kuyil kisaan
IN
R
57
Common-woodshrike
Tephrodornis pondiorianus
Kassappakaram
IN
R
Family:Pycnonotidae 58
Red-whiskered bulbul
Pycnonotus jocosus
Chivappu mesai cinnan
OM
R
59
Red-vented bulbul
Pycnonotus cafer
Kondai kuruvi
OM
R
60
Black-crested bulbul
Pycnonotus melanicterus
Karungontai cinnan
OM
R
61
Black bulbul
Hypsipetes leucocephalus
Karun cinnan
OM
R
R
Family:Irenidae 62
Gold-fronted chloropsis
Chloropsis aurifrons
Pachai cittu
OM
63
Asianfairy-bluebird
Irena puella
Vannachittu
OM
M
Family:Turdinae 64
Malabar whisting-thrush
Myiophonus horsfieldii
Pung kuruvi
OM
M
65
White-rumbed shama
Copsychus malabaricus
Shama
OM
R
66
Indian robin
Saxicoloides fulicata
Carkuruvi
IN
R
67
Pied bushchat
Saxicola caprata
kathirkuruvi
IN
R
Family:Timaliidae 68
Large gray babbler
Turdoides malcolmi
Chilampan
OM
R
69
Jungle babbler
Turdoides striatus
Chilampan
OM
R
70
White-heated babbler
Turdoides affinis
Chilampan
OM
R
Family:Sylviinae 71
Jungle prinia
Prinia sylvatica
Kattukathir kuruvi
IN
R
72
Ashy prinia
Prinia socialis
Sampal kathirkuruvi
IN
R
73
Plain prinia
Prinia inornata
kathirkuruvi
OM
M
74
Paddyfied warbler
Acrocephalus agricola
vayelKathirkuruvi
IN
RM
75
Indian greatreed warbler
Acrocephalus stentoreus
Nanal kathir kuruvi
IN
M
76
Common tailer bird
Orthotomus sutorius
Thyal cittu
IN
R
77
Red-throated flycatcher
Ficedula parva
Epedippan
IN
M
78
Nilgiri flycatcher
Eumyias albicaudatus
Epedippan
IN
M
Terpsiphone paradisi
Arasaval kuruvi
IN
RM
Ficedula subrubra
Epedippan
IN
M
Family:Monarchinae 79
Asian paradise-flycatcher
Family:Muscicapidae 80 802
Kashmir flycatcher
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Family:Dicaeidae 81
Tickell’s flower pecker
Dicaeum erythrorhynchos
Pakku chittu
FR
R
Family:Nectariniidae 82
Purple-rumbed sunbird
Nectarinia zeylonica
Manjal thenchittu
NR
R
83
Small sunbird
Nectarinia minima
China thencittu
IN,NR
M
84
Purple sunbird
Nectarinia asiatica
Uthathenchittu
IN
R
Family:Estrildidae 85
White-throated munia
Lonchura malabarica
Thiinai kuruvi
GR
R
86
Black-headed munia
Lonchura malacca
Thinaii kuruvi
GR
R
Passer domesticus
Chittu kuruvi
GR
R
Ploceus philippinus
thuknanagkuruvi
GR
R
Family:Passerinae 87
House sparrow
Family: ploceinae 88
Baya weaver
Family:Sturnidae 89
Grey-headed starling
Sturnus malabaricus
Sampal thalai myna
OM
R
90
Commom myna
Acridotheres tristis
Narathan kuruvi
OM
R
Oriolus xanthornus
Mangkuyil
OM
R
Family:Oriolidae 91
Black-headed oriole
Family:Dicruridae 92
Black Drongo
Dicrurus macrocercus
Karuvatuvalli
IN
R
93
Ashy Drongo
Dicrurus leucophaeus
Karisaan
IN
M
94
White-bellied Drongo
Dicrurus caerulescens
Vellai-vaittu Karisaan
IN
R
95
Spangled Drongo
Dicrurus hottentottus
Kontai karisaan
IN,NR
R
96
Bronzed Drongo
Dicrurus aeneus
Karumpachai karichan
IN
M
Family:Corvidae 97
Indian treepie
Dendrocitta vagabunda
Valkakkai
OM
R
98
White-bellied treepie
Dendrocitta leucogastra
White valaivaettukakai
OM
M
99
House crow
Corvus splendens
Manikagam
OM
R
100
Jungle crow
Corvus macrorhynchos
Andakagam
OM
R
IN-Insetivore, P-Piscivore, CR-Carnivore, GR-Granivore, OM-Omnivore, FR-Frugivore, PR-Predators, NR-Nectarivore. ; R – Resident; M – Migrant.
granivore was observed to be greater in number in this area due to the availability of food resources.
Study on breeding period of avifauna in the study area revealed that 28 bird species had their breeding
Study on nesting pattern of birds showed that
period during June to November, 24 birds had their
they were found to have a various pattern of nest. Birds
breeding periods during December to March, and 17
build cup nest (25 species), hole nest (24 species),
birds had their breeding periods during April to June, and
platform nest (15 species), pendent nest (5 species), bell
6 birds had breeding period without any specificity
shaped nest (3 species), ground nests (2 species) and
depending only on food and climatic conditions. 30% of
oyster shaped nest (1 species). Birds were observed to
birds had their breeding periods during the rainy season
use variety of materials for nest construction (Table 2).
and 50% of birds had their breeding periods during
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
803
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Table 2. Nesting details of birds in the study area COMMON NAME AND SCIENTIFIC NAME
NEST SITE
NEST TYPE
NEST MATERIALS
BREEDING TIME
Egretta garzetta Little Egret
Trees around lake area
Platform nest
Twigs
Nov-Feb
Casmerodius albus Large egret
Trees around lake area
Platform nest
Twigs
Nov-Feb
Ardeola grayii Indian Pond-Heron
Trees around lake area
Platform nest
Twigs, small stems
Nov-Apr
Milvus migrans Black kite
Tree canopy
Platform nest
Twigs, cloth, paper
Sep-Apr
Haliastur indus Brahminy kite
Trees in water area
Platform nest
Twigs, cloth, jute, coir
Dec-Apr
Ictinaetus malayensis Black eagle
Trees in hilly area
Platform nest
Twigs, stems, Rootlets
Nov-Mar
Francolinus pictus Painted francolin
Ground
Cup nest
Dry Grass, leaves
Jun-Sep
Coturnix coturnix Common Quail
Ground
Cup nest
Dry Grass, twigs
Mar-Jul
Pavo cristatus Indian Peafowl
Bushes
Platform nest
Grass, twigs
Jan-May
Amaurornis phoenicurus White-breasted water hen
Bushes
Cup nest
Twigs, leaves, small stems
Apr-Oct
Vanellus indicus Red-wattled Lapwing
Ground
Ground nest
Mud, twigs, grass
Mar-Sep
Pterocles exustus Chestnut-bellied sand grouse
Ground
Ground nest
Mud, twigs, grass
Jan-Apr
Columba livia Blue Rock pigeon
Temple towers/ stone buidings
Platform nest
Small sticks, fibres
Annual
Streptopelia tranquebarica Red collared-Dove
Bushes,Small trees
Platform nest
Twigs, small sticks
Annual
Treron phoenicoptera Yellow-legged Green-pigeon
Bushes,small trees
Platform nest
Twigs, Small stems
Mar-Jun
Psittacula krameri Rose-ringed parakeet
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Jan-Apr
Tyto alba Barn Owl
Temple towers/ Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Annual
Bubo bubo Eurasian Eagle Owl
Sandy riverbanks
Hole nest
-
Nov-May
Strix ocellata Mottled Wood-Owl
Tree holes/ Cavities
Hole nest
Twigs, feathers
Jan-Mar
Athene brama Spotted Owlet
Tree holes/ Cavities
Hole nest
Fibrers
Nov-Mar
804
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Collocalia unicolor Indian Edible-nest Swiftlet
Building towers
(Sirpi) shape
Saliva, grass, fibres, alga
Mar-Jun
Cypsiurus balasiensis Asian Palm Swift
Trees (Palm trees)
Cup nest
Soft flower, feathers
Annual Not in winter
Apus affinis House Swift
Temple towers/ Bridges
Cup nest
Alcedo atthis Small Blue kingfisher
Sandy river banks
Hole nest
-
Feb-Sep
Ceyx erithaca Oriental Dwarf kingfisher
Sandy river banks
Hole nest
-
July-Sep
Halcyon smyrnensis White-breasted kingfisher
Sandy river banks
Hole nest
-
Jan-Jul
Nyctyornis athertoni Blue-beared Bee-eater
River banks
Hole nest
-
Feb-Aug
Merops orientalis Small Bee-eater
Sandy road side
Hole nest
-
Feb-Jun
Merops leschenaulti Chestnut-headed Bee-eater
Sandy river banks
Hole nest
-
Feb-Jun
Coracias benghalensis Indian Roller
Tree holes
Hole nest
Upupa epops Hoo poe
Tree holes, cavities, building towers
Hole nest
-
Jan-Apr
Megalaima zeylanica Brown-headed barbet
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Feb-May
Megalaima viridis White-checked Barbet
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Dec-Jun
Dendrocopos nanus Brown-capped pygmy Woodpecker
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Feb-Jul
Picus chlorolophus Small yellow-naped Woodpecker
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Jan-May
Hole nest
-
Feb-Jul
Dinopium javanense Golenden backed Wood Pecker
Tree holes
Feathers, paddy leaves
Grasses, straw, cloth
Annual Not in winter
Jan-Apr
Chrysocolaptes lucidus Greater Golden-backed Wood pecker
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Dec-Mar
Hemicircus canente Heart-Spotted Wood pecker
Tree holes
Hole nest
-
Nov-Apr
Motacilla maderaspatensis Large Pied Wagtail
Water source Near
Cup nest
Root, grasses, threads, jute
Dec-Jun
Tephrodornis pondicerianus Common Wood Shrike
Trees
Cup nest
Barks, fibres
Feb-Jul
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
805
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Pycnonotus melanicterus Black-crested Bulbul
Small trees
Cup nest
Grasses, Twigs, spider threads, leaves
Jan-Aug
Pycnonotus jocosus Red-whiskkered Bulbul
Bushes, house roof
Cup nest
Twigs,leaves,spider threads, root lets
Dec-Jun
Pycnonotus cafer Red-vented Bulbul
Trees
Cup nest
Fibres, twigs
Feb-Nov
Hypsipetes leucocephalus Balck Bulbul
Trees
Cup nest
Grasses, dry leaves, wood Alga, wood mushrooms
Mar-Jun
Chloropsis aurifrons Gold-fronted cholropsis
Tree canopy
Cup nest
Fibres
Jan-Feb
Irena puella Asian Fairy-Blue bird
Forest-trees
Platform nest
Twigs, stems
Jan-Jun
Myiophonus horsfieldii Malabar whistling-thrush
Opportunistic
Cup nest
None
Apr-Sep
Hole nest
None
Apr-Jun
Copsychus malabaricus White-rumped Shama
Tree holes
Saxicoloides fulicata Indian Robin
Cavities, wall tree Holes
Hole nest
Grasses, feathers, straw
Feb-Jul
Saxicola caprata Pied bushchat
Bushes, wall, tree holes
Hole nest
Grasses feathers ,straw
Feb-May
Turdoides malcolmi Large Gray Babbbler
Bushes, small trees
Cup nest
Grasses, fibres, rootlets, twigs
Mar-Sep
Turdoides striatus Jungle Babbbler
Bushes, small trees
Cup nest
Grasses, roots, twigs
Mar-Oct
Turdoides affinis White-headed Babbler
Bushes, small trees
Cup nest
Grasses, roots, twigs
Mar-Oct
Prinia sylvatica Jungle prinia
Bushes
Ball shapped Nest
Grasses
Mar-Oct
Prinia Socialis Ashy prinia
Bushes
Cup nest
Fibres, small sticks
Apr-Aug
Orthotomus sutorius Common Tailor bird
Trees
Cup nest
Fibres, leaves, cotton wool
Apr-Dec
Eumyias albicaudata Nilgiri Flycatcher
Tree holes
Cup nest
Green tree’s Alga, Rootlets
Feb-Jun
Terpsiphone paradisi Asian Paradise-Flycatch
Trees
Cup nest
Fibres, twigs, rootlets, leaves
May-Jul
Dicaeum erythrorhynchos Tickell’s Flower pecker
Trees
Pendant nest
Fibres, grasses, rootlets, Spider thread
Jan-Jun
Nectarinia zcylonica Purple-rumped sunbird
Bushes, small trees
Pendant nest
Grasses, fibres, spider Threads
Feb-Apr
Nectarinia minima Small sunbird
Small trees
Pendant nest
Grasses, papers, spider Threads, fibres
Dec-Apr
806
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 Nectarinia asiatica Purple Sunbird
Small trees
Pendant nest
Grasses, leaves, fibres, Spiderthread
Jan-Jun
Lonchura malabarica White-throated Munia
Bushes, small trees
Ball shaped nest
Feathers, cotton wool
Dec-May
Lonchura Malacca Black-headed Munia
Small trees
Ball shaped
Grasses, fibres, straw
Oct-May
Passer domesticus House sparrow
Building roof, Holes, avities
Cup nest
Grasses, straw, cotton, many waste material
Annual
Ploceus philippinus Baya Weaver
Trees
Pendant nest
Paddy leaves, grasses
Depending Rainy season
Sturnus malabaricus Grey-headed starling
Tree holes
Hole nest
Acridotheres trists Common Myna
Treeholes, Building cavities
Cup nest
Twigs, roots, leaves, Polythene, feathers
Mar-Sep
Dicrurus macrocercus Black Drongo
Trees
Cup nest
Fibres, twigs
Mar-Jul
Dicrurus caerulescens White-bellied Drongo
Trees
Cup nest
Twigs, fibres
Mar-Jun
Dicrurus hottentottus Spangled Drongo
Trees
Paltform nest
Twigs, grasses, rootlets
Mar-Apr
Dendrocitta vaga bunda Indian Treepie
Trees
Platform nest
Twigs, fibres, coir, fine cloth
Mar-May
Dendrocitta leucogastra White-bellied Treepie
Trees
Cup nest
Leaves, twigs, rootlets
Feb-Apr
Corvus splendens House Crow
Trees, lamp post, House towers
Platform nest
Twigs, fine cloth, coir, fibres
Mar-Aug
Corvus macrorhynchos Jungle Crow
Trees
Platform nest
Leaves, twigs, fine cloth, coir, fibres
Feb-May
-
Apr-Jul
harvesting periods. Two harvesting season prevails in the
sumptuous amount of food, similarly birds that breed
study area, first during the month of February to March
during harvesting season were granivores, where they
and second during the month of November. 24 birds had
got food at a greater amount to feed their young ones.
their breeding during first harvesting season and another
Food is believed to be one of the most critical resources
24 during the second harvesting season. An interesting
for the survival and reproduction of animals. A
fact was observed that the bird species which had their
wellknown theory in ecology known as the ‘food
breeding periods during rainy season were observed to
availability-breeding time’, most birds breed at the time
be insectivores and omnivores, and bird species that had
when plenty of food is available for their chicks. Habitat
their breeding period during harvesting periods were
selection in birds is an account for their reproductive
insectivores, granivores and omnivores. They had their
success (Danchin et al., 1998).
chance of survival to a maximum by adapting a successful feeding strategy. During the rainy season insect population will be more, hence insectivore breeds during this time and they can feed their young one with Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
CONCLUSION Due
to
habitat
loss,
fragmentation
and
urbanization a vast land area that provide roost resource 807
Sudhakaran et al., 2013 for birds starts depleting at a greater rate. Hence study on
Joshua J and Johnsingh AJT. 1988. Observations on
the diversity and habitat is a need of the hour in order to
birds on Mundanthurai Plateau, Tamil Nadu. J. Bombay
make conservation priorities. This study generated a base
Nat. Hist.Soc. 85:565-577.
line data on the avifauna of this region, which may enlighten for further studies.
Kattan GH and Franco P. 2004. Bird diversity along elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: Area and mass effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We acknowledge Dr. A. J. A. Ranjit singh, Dr.
13:451-458.
K. R. Narayanan, and Mr. P.Parvathiraj., Department of
Rathinam K. 2002. Birds of Tamilnadu. (Tamilnattu
Zoology, Sri Paramakalyani College, for their help in
Paravaigal in Tamil) Meiappan pathipagam.
identification of bird species.
Recher HF and Davis WE. 2002. Foraging profile of a Salmon Gum woodland avifana in western Australia.
REFERENCE Balachandran S, Rahmani AR, Ezhilarasi N, Babu S, Chakravarthy JPP and Ramesh T. 2005. Revaluation
Jour.
Of
Royal
society
of
western
Australia.
85(2):103-111.
of bird community structure of Palni Hills with special
Salim Ali. 2002. The book of Indian birds, Thirteenth
reference to threatened and endemic species. Final
Revised Edition, Bombay Natural History Society
Report. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai. 105.
Oxford University Press, Mumbai.
Danchin E, Boulinier T and
Subramaninan KS. 2003. Koonthakulam.Swagat 21
Massot M. 1998.
Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: Implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79:2415-2428.
(3):50-51. Webb-Pelope CG. 1945. Notes on a few birds from south of the Tinnevelly district. J.Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
Grimmet R, Carol I, Tim I. 1999. A pictorial guide to the birds of the indian subcontinent. Oxford university press, Mumbai.
45:425-426. Wilkinson ME. 1961. Pelicanry at Kundakulam, Tirunelveli district. J.Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 58(2):514-
Jayson EA. 1994. Synecology and behavioural studies
515.
on the forest birds of Kerala. PhD Thesis, University of Calicut, Calicut. 314. Johnsingh AJT. 2001. The Kalakad-Mundanthurai
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com
Tiger
Advantages
Reserve:
A global
heritage
of biological
diversity. Current Science.; 80 (3): 378-388. Johnson JM. 1971. The heronry at Koonthakulam, Tirunelveli
district,
Birdwatchers 11(8):1-4.
Tamilnadu.
Newsletter
for
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
808
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 797-808
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
Heavy metal accumulation by Amaranthus hybridus L. grown on waste dumpsites in South-Eastern Nigeria. Authors: ABSTRACT: Uka UN1, Chukwuka KS2, 3 and Okorie N1. The accumulation of some heavy metals by Amaranthus hybridus grown on two waste dump sites within Abakaliki metropolis, South-Eastern Nigeria was studied using atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The results indicate that Cd, Cu and Pb Institution: in the two dump sites were above the stipulated standard, while Zn was 1.Department of Applied within the stipulated standard in the soil. The two dumpsites had high level of Pb in Biology, Ebonyi State the plant leaves; in Site 2, Cu and Zn showed the highest value while Zn in site 2 University, Abakalikihas the lowest value. Although all the values obtained in the leaves of Nigeria. Amaranthus hybridus were within recommended limits, but it may be dangerous to consume Amaranthus hybridus grown on dump sites since it can accumulate most of 2. Department of Botany, these toxic metals. The BCF value was >2 for Pb and Cd in site 1 while in site 2 the BCF University of Ibadan, value was >2 for Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd, showing that Amaranthus hybridus can tolerate Ibadan-Nigeria. and sequester these metals from soil and translocate them to the shoots. The TLF in Amaranthus hybridus indicate the following: in Iyiudele stream (Site 1) the rate of Cd 3. Department of Plant Science and Biotechnology, and Zn in Amaranthus hybridus up take is >1 and in site 2 the rate of Pb, Cd, Cu, and Abia State University, Zn up take in Amaranthus hybridus were >1. The results obtained from this study Uturu-Nigeria. showed that heavy metals in soils at the waste dump sites ended up in the studied plant, Amaranthus hybridus, cultivated on such land. Therefore farmers should be discouraged from cultivating their crops on these waste dump sites.
Corresponding author: Chukwuka KS.
Keywords: Heavy metal, Amaranthus hybridus, accumulation, pollution, Safety risk.
Email:
Article Citation: Uka UN, Chukwuka KS and Okorie N. Heavy metal accumulation by Amaranthus hybridus L . grown on Waste dumpsites in South-Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
kanayodrchukwuka97@gmail.com
Web Address: http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0298.pdf.
Dates: Received: 31 Oct 2012
Accepted: 14 Nov 2012
Published: 22 Feb 2013
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
809-817 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Uka et al., 2013 sites and analyzed for the concentrations of the
INTRODUCTION Vegetables constitute important functional food
two
metals
using
an
Atomic
Absorption
components by contributing protein, vitamins, iron and
Spectrophotometer. The results showed that levels
calcium which have marked health effects in all
of Lead and Copper in the two vegetables were found to
organisms (Arai, 2002). Vegetables, especially leafy
be below the maximum permissible levels recommended
vegetables, grown in heavy metal contaminated soils,
by FAO/WHO for the two metals in the vegetables.
accumulate higher amounts of metals than those grown
In Abakaliki, South-eastern Nigeria, there is an
in uncontaminated soils (Al Jassir et al., 2005). Heavy
indiscriminate and inappropriate waste disposal. This
metals are important contaminants and are found in the
implies that the concentration of heavy metals in both
surface and tissues of vegetables in environments with
plant and soil is expected to be high. In this study,
such contaminants. The quest for urbanisation and
Amaranthus hybridus was chosen for phytoremediation
industrialization has resulted to the contamination of soil
study as well as heavy metal contamination because
and metal accumulation in soils and crops, resulting to
it is a vegetable crop, rich in proteins, vitamins and
metal
maximum
minerals. Its yield, ability to grow in hot weather
permissible level. Plant species have a variety of
conditions, high nutritive value and their pleasant taste
capacities in removing and accumulating heavy metals,
and the fact that they grow all year round, makes it a
so there are reports indicating that some species may
popular vegetable. (Grubben, 1976). This study was
accumulate specific heavy metals, causing serious health
undertaken to determine:
contamination
exceeding
the
risk to human health when plant based food stuff are
the status of heavy metal (Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd)
consumed (Wenzel and Jackwer, 1999).
contamination in the selected waste dump soil in
Odai et al., (2008) studied the concentration
Abakaliki Urban.
levels of heavy metals in vegetables grown on urban
heavy metal concentrations in Amaranthus hybridus
waste dump sites. This study was carried out on three
from these waste dump sites and compare the levels
waste dump sites in Kumasi where vegetables cultivation
with WHO/FAO permissible levels.
(cabbage, lettuce and spring onions) are practiced. Crops
the extent of heavy metal uptake from these sites
and soil samples were collected and analyzed for the
using transfer factor
presence of four heavy metals: Cadmium, lead, copper and zinc. The levels of the two most toxic heavy metals
MATERIALS AND METHODS
were far higher in the vegetables than the WHO/FAO
The study was carried out during the month of
recommended values and the transfer factors of these
October, 2011 which is part of the rainy season
two metals were also the highest suggesting that
in
consumption of vegetables grown on such sites could
Amaranthus hybridus and soils were collected from 2
be
al.,
dump sites located at Iyiudele street and Abakaliki-
(2006) carried out a study to determine the levels of
Enugu Expressway located within Abakaliki Urban,
two heavy metals, Lead (Pb) and Copper (Cu), in two
Ebonyi State. Ebonyi State lies within the Cross River
popular leafy vegetables grown around Morogoro
plain, approximately between 7°30’ N and 8°30’ N
Municipality in Tanzania.
latitude
dangerous
to human
health.
Chove
Vegetable
et
samples
of
the
area
and
under
5°40’E
investigation.
and
Samples
6°45’E
of
longitude
Pumpkin leaves (Cucurbita moschata) and Chinese
(Nnamani et al, 2009). A total of 12 plants and soil
cabbage (Brassica chinensis) were collected from three
samples were collected from the two dump sites (six per
810
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
Uka et al., 2013 Table 1 Heavy metal variations (Mg/g) in soil sample from some waste dumpsites in Abakaliki Urban. Sample Location Site 1 Site 2
Pb 0.12±0.01 0.07±0.01
Cu 0.24±0.01 0.06±0.01
Zn 0.01±0.00 0.01±0.00
Cd 0.05±0.01 0.08±0.01
dump site). The plants were washed with tap water to
were absorbed by the plant from the soil (Ghosh and
remove sand from the leaves, stem and roots. The plants
Singh, 2005a) and is calculated using the formula:
were put into separate polythene bags, labelled and taken to the laboratory. In the laboratory the plants were
BCF =
Metal Concentration in whole plant
further washed with distilled water.
Concentration of metal in soil To
Identification of plants
evaluate
the
potential
of
plants
for
The selected plant was collected in triplicate.
phytoextraction the translocation factor (TF) was used,
The identification and taxonomic characterization was
according to Marchiol et al., (2000) and is calculated as
performed at the herbarium facility of the Ebonyi State
follows:
University, Abakaliki through botanical keys where the vouchers were deposited.
TF = Metal Concentration (Stem + leaves) Metal concentration (roots)
Sample preparation and analysis The plants were separated into leaves, stem and root and air dried for 21 days to remove moisture. Soil
RESULTS
samples were air dried for 21 days, then sieved through
The mean concentration of the four heavy metals
2 mm mesh. 0.5 g dried, grinded and sieved plant and
(Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd) in soil samples from the waste dump
soil samples were analysed according to methods of
sites in Abakaliki Urban are presented in Table 1. The
Umoren and Onianwa (2005). Concentrations of Pb, Cu,
mean concentration of Pb ranged from 0.07±0.01 in site
Zn and Cd were determined using atomic absorption
2 to 0.12±0.01 Mg/g in site 1 (Table 1and Fig 1). Mean
spectrophotometer model sp-9 (Pye Unicam). The mean
concentration of Cu ranged from 0.06± 0.01 Mg/g in site
values of three determinations per composite sample
2 to 0.24±0.01 Mg/g in site 1. These differences were
were recorded.
significant (P<0.05). The mean concentration of Zn (0.01±0.00) in both sites were similar, while the highest
was used to determine the quantity of heavy metals that
mean concentration of Cd (0.08±0.01) was found in
Concentration Mg/Kg
Concentration Mg/Kg
The Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) of metals
Site 2 Site 1 Figure 1 Concentration of metals in soil samples from the waste dump soil samples Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
811
Uka et al., 2013 Table 2 Heavy metal contamination of Amaranthus hybridus (Plant parts) (Mg/kg) at waste dumpsites in Abakaliki Urban. Site 1 Site 2 *WHO/FAO Root Stem Leaf Root Stem Leaf Metal/Plant Part Pb 0.01±0.00 0.33±0.08 0.5±0.11 0.2±0.06 0.04±0.01 0.6± 0.12 0.30 Cu 0.12±0.01 0.07±0.01 ND 0.08±0.01 0.05±0.01 0.08±0.02 73.30 Zn ND ND 0.01±0.00 0.03±0.01 0.04±0.01 0.09±0.01 99.40 Cd 0.02±0.01 0.43±0.01 ND 0.05±0.01 0.38±0.01 0.15±0.01 0.20 WHO/FAO = Guideline for heavy metal concentration in leafy vegetables site 2 compared to ‘site 1’ (0.05± 0.01). However, the
Table 2). The concentration of Pb in leaf and stem in site
differences were not significant (P >0.05).
1 were above the WHO/FAO limit for vegetables, while
The comparison of the maximum levels of the
Cu and Zn were within the acceptable standard. Cd
various heavy metals in the dump site soil from site 1
concentration in stem was also above WHO/FAO Limit.
and site 2 to acceptable standards is as shown in Table 2.
Amaranthus hybridus from old Kpirikpiri ranged
Cd, Cu and Pb were above the stipulated standard. Zn
as follows: Pb-0.2 mg/g for root,0.04 for stem and
was within the acceptable standard.
0.6 mg/g for leaf. Cu ranged from 0.08 mg/g-root,
The
accumulation
of
metals
in
the
0.05 mg/g-stem, 0.08 mg/g for leaf. Zn ranging from
Amaranthus hybridus parts from Iyiudele stream were
0.03 mg/g-root, 0.04 mg/g-stem and 0.09mg/g leaf and
varied with Pb ranging from 0.01 mg/g- root, 0.33 mg/g-
Cd ranging from 0.05 mg/g- root, 0.38 mg/g- stem and
stem and 0.5 mg/g leaf, Cu ranged from 0.12 mg/g-
0.15 mg/g - leaf (Figure 1, Table 2). Pb concentration in
root,0.07 mg/g stem and leaf (not detected); Zn ranging
leaf at site 2 was above the recommended dietary
from 0.01 mg/g for leaf, while it was detected in root and
allowance. The concentration of Cd in stem was above
stem. Cd ranged from 0.02 mg/g for root, 0.43 mg/g
the WHO/FAO allowance.
Cu Concentration Mg/Kg Cd Concentration Mg/Kg
Zn Concentration Mg/Kg
Pb Concentration Mg/Kg
for stem, while in leaf it was not detected (Figure 1,
Figure 2 Comparison of metal content in soil from the study sites 812
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
Uka et al., 2013 Table 2 Mean concentration (Mg/g) found in the dumpsite soil and maximum permissible metal content in soil This Study Maximum Standards Pb 0.13 0.0066 Cu 0.26 0.0066 Zn 0.02 0.05 Cd 0.08 0.07 Source: Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 1992;
from the studied sites were above the stipulated standard,
Determination of the movement of metals from soil to
and a clean environment. Al Jassir et al., (2005) reported
plant
that
while zinc was within the acceptable standard (Table 2). The high levels of heavy metals in the dump site could be attributed to huge amount of waste products disposed of at the dump site (Ebong et al., 2007). The high levels of these metals present the sites as potentially hazardous and highly inimical to the food chain and biological life leafy
vegetables
grown
in
heavy
metals
The Bioconcentration factor (BCF) represented
contaminated soils, accumulate higher amount of metals
in Table 4 showed the ability of Amarathus hybridus to
than those grown in uncontaminated soils because of the
extract heavy metals from the soil. BCF Value at the site
fact that they absorb these metals through their leaves.
1 was highest for Cd followed by Pb, Zn and Cu. At site
Pb is a chemical pollutant in the environment and
2, the BCF index was highest for Zn followed by Pb, Cd
an element that is toxic to plants. (Sasmaz et al., 2008).
and Cu.
Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (2001) reported that
Translocation Factor
Pb contents of plants grown in uncontaminated areas
Metals that are accumulated by plants and mostly
varied between 0.05 and 3.0 mg/kg. Carranza- Alvarez et
stored in the roots of plants are indicated by TF values
al., (2008) also reported that Pb concentration ranged
<1. Values >1 indicate translocation to the aerial parts of
from 10 to 25 Mg/kg. In this study, Pb accumulation was
plant. These are represented in Table 5. Values <1 were
higher in the leaves of Amaranthus hybridus in the two
found for Cu and Zn in site 1, while values >1 were
sites. According to Zurera-Cosano et al., (1989),
found for Pb and Cd in site 1. TF values were >1 in
vegetables take up metals by absorbing them from
site 2.
contaminated as well as from deposits on different parts of vegetables exposed to the air from polluted
DISCUSSIONS
environment.
naturally growing Amaranthus hybridus from selected
in both dump sites are lower than 11.50Âą2.16, 2.50,
waste dump sites in Abakaliki urban was carried out. The
0.923 mg kg-1 as reported in different types of vegetables
results show that Cd, Cu and Pb concentration in the soil
by Farooq et al., (2008). In site 1 there was no trace of
Concentration Mg/Kg
The ranges of Cu obtained in all the plant parts
Concentration Mg/Kg
A study of Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd in soils and
Figure 3 Heavy metal content (Pb,Cu, Zn and Cd ) of Amaranthus hybridus at the study sites Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
813
Cu Concentration in root, stem and leaf Mg/Kg
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
Cd Concentration in root, stem and leaf Mg/Kg
0
Zn Concentration in root, stem and leaf Mg/Kg
Pb Concentration in root, stem and leaf Mg/Kg
Uka et al., 2013
Figure 4 Mean concentration of Pb,Cu,Zn and Cd in roots, stem and leaf of Amaranthus hybridus from the two respective sites Cu in the leaf of Amaranthus hybridus, it could be that
0.43Âą0.01 and leaf was below detection limit. Cd in the
the metal is within the root and stem, thus it has not been
stem of Amaranthus hybridus in site 1 was higher when
translocated to the leaf. Despites the presence of Cu in
compared to the ranges of Cd obtained
the other parts of Amaranthus hybridus, it was within the
vegetables as reported by Maleki and Zarasvard (2008)
recommended limit.
but lower than 0.667-0.933 as reported in other
In site 1 there were no trace of Zn in the root and stem but present in the leaf with low value, the absence
from other
vegetables (Abdullahi et al., 2009). However, the level of Cd in the stem is within the recommended limit.
of Zn in the root and stem of Amaranthus hybridus in
Comparing the two dump sites, stem had a higher
site 1 may be that it has been volatilized or that it is not
heavy metal, it could be that Amaranthus hybridus had
essential for plant growth, the presence of Zn in the leaf
taken these metals up and stored mostly in the stem. The
may be due to emissions from the environment. In site 2,
BCF signifies the amount of heavy metals in the soil that
there were presence of Zn in the root, stem and leaf of
ended up in the vegetable crop. The BCF values were >2
Amaranthus hybridus although the leaf had higher heavy
for Pb and Cd at site 1 whereas in site 2 BCF values was
metal but they were all within recommended standard.
>2 for Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd. This implies that the degree of
However, since the leaf of this vegetable is the edible
transportability of these metals is site dependent and
part, continuous intake of this vegetable from the dump
could be due to different forms in which these metal ions
sites may be toxic and lethal to the health of the
are available at these sites. These results enable us to
consumers.
conclude that Amaranthus hybridus can tolerate and
The
fr om
sequester these metals from the soil and translocate it to
Amaranthus hybridus in Site 1 are, root 0.02Âą0.01, stem,
the shoots, thus making Amaranthus hybridus cultivated
814
ranges
of
Cd
obtained
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
Uka et al., 2013 Table 5 Translocation factor of the studied heavy metals at the dumpsite soil in Abakaliki Urban Translocation Factor Site 1 Site 2 Pb 83* 3.20* Cu 0.53 1.63* Zn 0.01 4.33* Cd 21.50 10.60* Values > 1 are regarded as high values Table 4 Bioconcentration factor (BCF) of each metal at the dumpsite soil in Abakaliki Urban
Pb Cu Zn Cd
Bioconcentration Factor Site 1 Site 2 7 12 0.8 3.5 1 16 9 7.3
metals
by
the
action
of
phytochelatins
and
metallothioneins, forming complexes with heavy metals and translocate them into vacuoles (Suresh and Ravishankar, 2004). The results obtained from this study have shown that heavy metals in soils at the waste dump sites ended up in the studied plant, Amaranthus hybridus, cultivated on such land. The Four heavy metals Lead, Cadmium, Copper and Zinc were present in the studied sites. The concentration of lead and Cadmium that ended up in this vegetable
far
exceeded
the
WHO/FAO
dietary
allowance. Therefore farmers should be discouraged from cultivating their crops on these waste dump sites.
BCF values > 2 will be regarded as high values REFERENCES on these waste dump sites unfit for human consumption. The translocation factor can be used to estimate
Abdullahi MSA, Uzairu and Okunota OJ. 2009. Quantitative
determination
of
Heavy
metal
plants potential for phytoremediation purposes. Metals
concentrations in onion leaves. Int. J. Environ. Res.,
that are accumulated by plants and mostly stored in the
3:271-274.
roots of plants are indicated by TLF values greater than 1. The translocation ability of Amaranthus hybridus for these heavy metals were in these order Pb (83) >Cd (21.50), while in site 2, Cd (10.60) >Zn (4.33) >Pb (3.20) >Cu (1.63). This is an indication of efficient way of
Al-Jassir MSA Shaker and Khaliq MA. 2005. Depositin of heavy metals on green leafy vegetables sold on roadsides of Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 75:1020-1027.
transportation of these metals from root and its
Arai S. 2002. Global view on functional foods: Asian
accumulation in shoot. Baker (1981) and Zu et al.,
Perspectives. Brit J.Nutr.88: S139 - S143.
(2005) reported that TLFs higher than 1.0 were determined in metal accumulator species, whereas TLFs was typically lower than 1.0 in metal excluder species. The TLFs higher than 1.0 indicated an efficient ability to
Baker AJM. 1981. Accumulators and Excluders strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. Journal of Plant Nutrition 3:643-654.
transport metal from root to leaf, most likely due to
Carranza-Alvarez C, Alonso-Castro AJ, Alfaro-De
efficient metal transporter system of plants (Zhao et al.,
La Torre, MC, Gareia-De La Cruz RF. 2008.
2002), and probably sequestration of metals in leaf
Accumulation and distribution of heavy metals in
vacuoles and apoplast (Lasat et al., 2002). The vacuole is
Scirpus americanus and Typha latifolia from an artificial
generally considered to be the main storage site for
lagoon in San Luis Potos, Mexico.Water Air Soil
metals in yeast and plant cells, and there is evidence that
Pollution 188:279-309.
phytochelatin-metal complexes are pumped into the vacuole (Gratトバ et al., 2005). It was reported that plants also have the ability to hyperaccumulate various heavy Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
Chove BE, Ballegu WR and Chove LM. 2006. Copper and lead levels in two popular leafy vegetables grown 815
Uka et al., 2013 around Morogoro municipality, Tanzania. Tanzania
Marchiol L, Assolari S, Sacco P and Zerbi G.
Health Res. Bull., 8:37-40.
2004. Phytoextraction of heavy metals by canola
Ebong GA, Udoessien EI and Ita BN. 2004. Seasonal Variations of Heavy metal concentration in Qua Iboe River, Estuary, Nigeria. Global J. Pure Applied sic., 1: 247-256.
Heavy metals grown in the vicinity of an industrial area. Pak. J. Bot., 40:2099-2106. Ghosh M and Singh SP. 2005a. A comparative study of cadmium phytoextraction by accumulator and weed species. Environmental Pollution, 133:365-371.
132:21-27.
Assessment of nutritional values of three underutilized indigenous leafy vegetables of Ebonyi State,Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(9):2321-2324. Odai SNE, Mensah D. Sipitey, Ryo S and Awuah E. 2008. Heavy metals uptake by vegetables cultivated on urban waste dumpsites. Case study of Kumasi, Ghana. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 2:92-99.
Gratao PL, Prasad MNV, Cardoso PF, Lea PJ and Azevedo RA. 2005. Phytoremediaion: green technology for the clean up of toxic metals in the environment. Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 17:53-64.
Sasmaza A, Obekb E and Hasarb H. 2008. The accumulation of heavymetals in Typha latifolia L. grown in a stream carrying secondary efďŹ&#x201A;uent. Ecological engineering 33: 278-284.
Grubben GJH. 1976. The cultivation of amaranth as a tropical leaf vegetable with special reference to South Dahomey. IN RESEARCH, C. D. O. A. (Ed.). Amsterdam, Royal Tropical Institute.
Suresh
B
and
Ravishankar
Ph yt or em edi a ti on -A approach
for
n ovel
GA.
and
2004.
pr om i sing
en vir onmental
clean
up. Crit Rev Biotechnol., 24:97-124.
Kabata-Pendias A and Pendias A. 2001. Trace Elements in plants and Soils. CRC Press Inc Boca Raton Florida, 337.
Umoren IU and Onianwa PC. 2005. Concentration and distribution of some heavy in urban soils of Ibadan, Nigeria. Pak. J. Ind. Res., 48: 397-401.
Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. 2001. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants. CRC Press, Washington, D.C.
biological
mechanism.
Journal
of
Environmental Quality 31:109-120. Maleki A and Zarasvand MA. 2008. Heavy metals in selected edible vegetables and estimation of their daily intak in Sanandaj, Iran. South East Asian. J. Trop Med. Public Health. 39:335-340.
Wenzel W and Jackwer F. 1999. Accumulation of heavy metals in plants grown on mineralized solids of
Lasat MM. 2002. Phytoextraction of toxic metals: a of
on multicontaminated soil. Environmental Pollution,
Nnamani CV, Oselebe HO and Agbatutu A. 2009.
Farooq M, Anwar F and Rashid U. 2008. Appraisal of
review
(Brassica napus) and radish (Raphanus sativus) grown
the Austrian Alps. Environ. Poll., 104:145-155. WHO. 1996. trace Elements in Human Nutrition and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva. Zhao FJ, Hamon RE, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ and McGrath SP. 2002. Characteristics of cadmium uptake in two contrasting ecotypes of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:535-543.
816
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
Uka et al., 2013 Zu YQ, Li Y, Chen JJ, Chen HY, Qin L and Schvartz C. 2005. Hyperaccumulation of Pb,Zn and Cd in Herbaceous grown on Lead and Zinc Mining area in Yuman, China. Environmental International 31:755-762 Zurera-Cosano G, Moreno-Rojas R, SamlmeronEgea J and lora RP. 1989. Heavy metal uptake from greenhouse border soils for edible vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric., 49:307-314.
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com Advantages
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 809-817
817
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
Treatment of digestive tract ailments in cattle with herbal folk-medicines: A preliminary study in Ganjam District. Authors: Dibakar Mishra
Institution: Department of Zoology, Polasara Science College, Polasara, District: Ganjam, Odisha, 761 105 India.
Corresponding author: Dibakar Mishra.
Email: drdkm@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT: Use of medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of digestive tract ailments in cattle has originated long back in the history. An attempt was made to list out different successful preparations used by rural traditional healers and farmers to cure the common digestive tract ailments of the domestic cattle, mainly cows and buffaloes. Personal interviews with pre-structured questionnaire, observation of preparation of herbal medicines and their administration, results attained etc. were made to make a preliminary study of the traditional method of treatment. Collection of sample plant species and their identification, refinements of the methods adopted for preparation of these herbal medicines were done with the help of the local people especially the village heads and older persons. A total of 66 plant species of 40 families distributed in 61 genera was recorded. Efficacy of these preparations was examined in the subsequent visits. Problems identified by the farmers include: lack of support for validation of these herbal medicines and less availability of some medicinal plants due to their seasonal nature. Such traditional/folk medicines used against digestive tract ailments of domestic cattle, continuing with the rural folk of the study area, still remained unnoticed and undocumented.
Keywords: Ethno-veterinary, folk medicine, Ganjam, traditional healers, traditional knowledge. Abbreviations : g = Gram ; ml = milliliter ; Km = Kilometer ; sq = Square .
Tel: (+91)9778098432
Article Citation: Dibakar Mishra. Treatment of digestive tract ailments in cattle with herbal folk-medicines: A preliminary study in Ganjam District. Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Web Address:
Dates: Received: 11 Jan 2013
http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0322.pdf.
Accepted: 10 Feb 2013
Published: 07 Mar 2013
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
818-827 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Mishra,2013 the study area. Apart from different cattle ailments,
INTRODUCTION India has a vast knowledge of herbal preparations
digestive disorders were observed frequently which
for treatment of different ailments both of human and of
make the animals sick, thus affecting the economy of the
animals. Major part of this art of healing has either been
owners and thus it was selected for the present study.
vanished or been ignored. Still it is found with some people living in the remote corners, who are either
MATERIALS AND METHODS
farmers or animal owners. Their system of treatment
The study area, Ganjam district extends between o
varies greatly either due to geographical gap or due to
19.4 N to 20.17oN latitude and 84.7oE to 85.12oE
climatic differences. It has also been observed that these
longitude and occupies an area of 8070.6 Km2 with a
preparations show wonderful results, without any
population density of 385/Km2. It has 22 blocks and 18
side-effects in comparison to their modern counterparts,
urban local bodies. There are 3212 villages constituting
the allopathic medicines. (Vijai et al., 2009).
475 gram panchayats. Forest area recorded is about
This traditional science of healing is purely based
58136sq Kms. Agriculture and animal husbandry being
on trial and error by the aboriginal people and was
the most important economic sectors of the district and
transmitted through words of mouth from generation to
the inhabitants chiefly live in rural and semi-urban areas.
generations. Further as plants are inseparable from
(Dist. Stat. Handbook Ganjam, 2007). Diseases of the
human life, their uses cannot be ignored. While plants
domestic animals mostly affect the socio-economic
fulfill the basic requirements of human civilization like
status of the inhabitants and usually depend upon their
food, shelter and clothing, it also is used for their better
own traditional method of herbal treatment.
health. India and Indian culture have exploited about
During 2008 to 2011 the work was scheduled
more than 2500 plants for medicinal purpose and this art
with the aim to record all the available EVM in the
of treatment has become a part of folklore medicines.
district. Extensive survey was conducted throughout the
Such medicines are at present practiced by a small
district to identify the traditional healers or locally called
segment of our society who has a separate identity as
the pashu vaidya and persons with this knowledge.
“Pasu vaidya” or the animal doctors or more commonly
Data collection was done by interviews, pre-
the traditional healers. (Chendel et al., 1996; Sankar
structured questions, group discussions with the local
Ganesh et al., 2007). Since no written records of such
people within the age group of thirty to seventy including
drugs are available, it is possible that this invaluable
both the sexes. Livestock owners, traditional Healers
knowledge of our farmers would get lost in history.
(THs), veterinarians, farmers, and housewives were
The
traditional
folk-medicines
that
are
inseparable from the rural life of India are better known
contacted for collection of data. During subsequent
visits data
verification,
as “Ethnoveterinary Medicines” (EVM) which can better
identification of plants used, methods of drug preparation
be defined as the result of a long term practice of herbal
and modes of drug administration were recorded. Most
treatment of animals which has been deeply integrated
of the THs were illiterate and some were only able to
with the custom and tradition of Indian life. (Mathius-
read and write while few attended primary schooling.
Mundy and McCorkle, 1989).
Sample specimens of each medicinal plant
By this time steps are being taken to establish
species were collected during the field visits and allotted
this traditional heritage of folk medicinal science and
collection numbers. The collected specimens were then
the present work is the first step in this regard in 819
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Mishra, 2013
Figure 1. study Area-Ganjam district. dried, identified through Flora of Orissa. (Saxena and
RESULTS
Brahmam, 1994-1996).
During the course of the present work significant
During the following seasons, preparations were
information regarding treatment of some common
examined on-field to get concurrent result. Case history
digestive tract ailments were observed and recorded. The
of common digestive ailments of cattle, response of
preparations those are frequently used with remarkable
the cattle owners to the disease, prescriptions of the THs
results are described under.
and farmers, dose and administration of the herbal
Anorexia
preparations, effectiveness of EVM were recorded.
1.
10 to 12 Leaves of Cymbopogon citratus D.C. Stapf.
Standardization of the quantity of herbal materials taken
(Poaceae), black salt-10 g ground together with rice
by the THs was also done to get accurate results. The
water to make a volume of 500 ml. The liquid is
specific and reliable information was cross checked with
drenched to the infected animal.
at least 50% of the informants were incorporated. Out of
2.
Apium
graveolens
L.
(Apiaceae)
15
g,
different cattle diseases only seven common intestinal
Carum carvi L. (Apiaceae) 15 g, Myristica fragrans
ailments were selected for the present study.
Houtt. (Myristicaceae) 5 g, dry ginger 30 g,
Details of medicinal plants used in this study are
Piper nigrum L. (Piperaceae) 25 to 30 pieces, and
presented with botanical name followed by family in
fried Ferula assafoetida L. (Apiaceae) 10 g are dry
italics within parentheses.
ground and mixed together. Half teaspoonful of this powder mixed with 200 ml pre-boiled and cooled
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-027
820
Mishra,2013
3.
water to prepare the tonic. It is drenched to the
ground together in water and administered orally
animal once a day for 7 days. (Mishra, 2010)
twice daily.
A. graveolens, C. carvi and dry ginger in a ratio of
orally for five to seven times daily yields a very
teaspoonful of this powder is mixed with 1
good result.
once a day for seven days. (Mishra, 2010)
(Bromeliaceae) and C. carvi seed with black salt are
Dry ginger 25 g and common salt 1/2 teaspoonful
ground together with water and drenched to the
with a little water is ground to make a paste. It is fed
animal. 4.
8.
f.
c on t a i n i n g
powder is the best worm killer. 5.
Juglans cinerea L. (Juglandaceae) extracts in water
appetizer especially during fever.
administered orally once daily for seven days
Five to seven unseeded fruits of Terminalia chebula
eliminates worms in intestine. 6.
The root of Mucuna prurita Hook. (Fabaceae) is
little black salt and jaggery for oral administration as
administered orally with straw to kill and remove
a paste to increase digestive power.
intestinal worms of cattle.
Whole plant extract of Mormodica charantia L.
7.
20 g of adventitious roots of Ficus benghalensis L.
(Cucurbitaceae) is prepared in cold water and bottle-
(Moraceae) is crushed and mixed in 100 ml of water.
fed to the animal to increase its appetite.
Mixture is fed to the animal twice in a day treat
T.
chebula,
Terminalia
bellerica
Roxb.
worms. Animal is completely relieved in 2 days.
(Combretaceae) and Embelica officinalis Gaertn.
Coccidiosis
(Euphorbiaceae) in equal amount are pulverized. 15
1.
Freshly prepared rice with A. indica A. Juss. (neem)
to 20 g. of this powder with cold water is drenched
leaves mixed with a little of P. nigrum L. (black
to the cattle as an appetizer. Commonly this powder
pepper) powder is fed to the animal. 2.
Flowers of Musa paradisiaca L. are ground with
Seedless T. belerica 25 g is ground with a little of
water mixed with leaf extracts of Feronia limonia L.
black salt and water, and fed to the ailing animals
Sw. administered orally. 3.
10. 8-10 plants of Mentha spicata L. (Lamiaceae) are crushed to extract juice. Juice is fed with salt in the
4.
Young leaf extract of M. charantia, C. citratus, mixed with fresh Curcuma longa L. in equal proportions are administered orally as a liquid food
Ascariasis Black
Young leaf extract of Sesbania sesban L. is given as drink to the young calf.
mornings and evenings. salt,
C.
carvi,
Solanum
nigrum
L.
(Solanaceae) or Embelia tsjeriam-cottam (Roem. & Schult.) DC. (Myesinaceae) in equal proportions are
821
s up pl em en ts
Schult.
ground to paste and mixed with a bit of P. nigrum
twice daily for seven days.
1.
l ea f
sativus
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (Meliaceae) leaf
is called as â&#x20AC;&#x17E;Trifalaâ&#x20AC;&#x;. 9.
Cattle
Ananas
2-3 fruits of Citrus aurantifolia L. (Rutaceae) are
Retz. (Combretaceae) powdered and mixed with a
7.
Fresh young leaf juice of Phoenix sylvestris Roxb. (Arecaceae),
powder and black salt. This is administered orally as 6.
3.
fed to the animal as such or rubbed with its tongue
to the animal once daily. 5.
C. carvi 15 g. is ground with water and administered
1:1:2 are dry ground to make a powder. 1 teaspoonful of jaggery to prepare a paste which is
4.
2.
gives best result. 5.
Brassica campestris L. (mustard) seeds (100-150 g) are ground with a little water to make a paste and are
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Mishra,2013
6.
given daily once for one week to control intestinal
is added to water to make a volume of 250 ml. The
parasites in cattle.
mixture is drenched to the cattle twice daily for 3-4
Leaves of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. are good
days.
to expel worms in calves.
2.
20 leaves of C. citratus and one teaspoonful of black
Coli-Bacilosis / Septisemic Coli-Bacilosis
salt is ground together with 200 ml. water and given
1.
to the cattle twice daily.
Dry ginger (Sonth) 50 g, Cuminum cyminum L. (cumin) seeds 25 g, salt as per requirement are
3.
are ground together with water and administered
(about 100-150 ml.). It is given to the animal to
orally to the animal. 4.
leaves of Cassia angustifolia Vahl., 20g of black
interval of 4 - 6 hours.
salt are ground together to powder. 10-15g of this
C. ciratus leaves 10-12 g ground with rice-water and
powder mixed with 50 g old jaggery mixed together
salt are given to the infected calf thrice daily for 2 -
to make a bolus which is fed to the animal once
3 days.
daily for 4-5 days.
50 g C. longa (turmeric) powder 200 g jaggery, given to the animal as feed. If the calf is unable to
5. 6.
Two teaspoonful of Triphala powder is given to the
eat then the same may be ground in water and
animal with warm water (300 - 500ml) once daily
administered orally twice daily.
for 5 days.
Rice water, salt, and C. cyminum L. (cumin) seeds twice daily for 3-5 days.
7.
Solanum viarum Dunal whole plant extract with a bit of black salt is given to the animal for relief.
8.
75 g rhizome of Z. officinale, a little amount of
Farmers use a powder crushed separately with few
Aloe vera L., 400g of table salt, 200 g of molasses
leaves of Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) 50 g,
made from Saccharum officinarum L. is mixed with
Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke (pearl millet)
100 ml warm water, thoroughly mixed and fed to
50 g, fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seeds
cattle while still warm.
50 g, Brassica campestris L. (mustard) 25 g, ajmoda
9.
(Trachyspermum ammi) and 50g of black pepper
400 ml coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water is slightly warmed and given to cattle.
(Piper nigrum). It is mixed together and soaked in
10. 250 g whole plant of Boerhavia repens L. is crushed
one litre water for 12 hours. The water is boiled,
thoroughly to extract juice and the juice fed with
filtered and stored in a clean glass bottle. This
table salt at eight hour intervals.
solution (100 ml) is given to the affected calf before
Diarrhoea
it is allowed to suck. Within two days the calves
1.
excrete dead worms. 25 leaves of C. citratus, 100 g of ginger, Zingiber officinale Rosc. and 25 g of common salt
One flower of Musa paradisiaca L. ground to paste with 10-15 black pepper (P. nigrum L.) is given to the animal once daily for 4-5 days.
Constipation 1.
Root juice of Ruta graveolens L. is given to the animal once daily for 4 -5days.
25 g are ground finely and given to the calf as syrup 5.
T. chebula 2-3 pieces, C. carvi 50 g, 10-15 dry
or thrice as per the condition of the calf with an
100 g fresh soft C. dactylon are mixed together and
4.
Sonth 50 g, T. chebula 3-4 pieces and common salt
ground together and mixed with luke warm water drink or given with the help of a pipe or bottle twice
2.
3.
2.
One
flower
each
of
M.
paradisiaca
and
Feronia limonia L. Sw. are ground together with
are ground together with water to make a paste. This Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
822
Mishra, 2013 water and drenched to the animal once daily for 5 3. 4.
days.
pulverized and mixed with 250 ml of buttermilk,
One handful young leaves of Sesbania sesban L. is
then filtrate of this is taken and mixed with goat
fed to the animal twice daily for 3 days.
faeces and to be fed 3-4 times.
Leaf extract of M. charantia, fresh C. domestica,
14. Leaves of Nymphaea nouchali Burm. f. are mixed
C. citratus in equal proportions mixed with sonth
with soda and fed to the cattle 50 ml daily for 2-3
(Z. officinale) powder is drenched to the animal
days. This is very effective in blood diarrhoea.
twice daily for 5 days. In case of calves up to 2 years 5.
7.
8.
15. Sap of 250 ml M. paradisiaca leaves and 100 ml.
the dose is reduced to half.
sap of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Willd. are
Root bark of Calotropis procera R.Br. 20 g ground
mixed with 250 g of sugar and fed to the cattle for 2-
with 10 gms of C. carvi to make a paste. With
3 days.
freshly prepared rice this paste is fed to the animal 6.
13. Six pieces of Bombax insigne L. seeds are
16. Bark and fruit of T. bellerica are pulverised and
twice daily for 5days.
mixed with water and boiled. 50 ml of this
Bark of Strychnos asper Lour. is boiled with water
preparation is drenched everyday for 4 - 5 days.
to prepare a tincture. One tablespoon of Sonth
17. 50 ml. sap of leaves of T. indica and Cassia fistula
(Z. officinale) powder is mixed with one glass of the
L. are mixed with the powder of 30 pieces black
tincture and drenched to the animal twice daily.
pepper (P. nigrum) and administered orally once a
Leaf extract of Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr., F.
day for 3-4 days.
limonia, extract of Z. officinale Rosc., common salt
18. 100 ml. extract of Holarrhena antidysenterica Wall.
and sonth powder mixed together and drenched
ex A. DC. leaves are to be fed to the cattle for 2-3
twice or thrice daily for 3 days.
days.
Pulp of 10 g of ripened Tamarindus indica L. is fed
19. 50
to the animal for 2-3 days. 9.
50 ml sap of Psidium guajava L. leaves is fed twice
ml.
juice
obtained
from
the
bark
of
Shorea robusta Gaertn.f. is drenched to the animal. 20. 50-60 ml of tincture of stem bark of A. catechu is
daily. (In case of goats this is much effective).
given to the animal twice daily for 2-3 days.
10. Roots of Mimosa pudica L., Achyranthes aspera L.,
21. Barks and leaves of A. catechu (L. f.) Willd. are
Cassia occidentalis L., bark of Yucca gloriosa L. are
crushed, boiled in water and the water fed to cows,
to be mixed and grounded. 100 pieces of P. nigrum
buffaloes or goats every morning and evening.
and 2 teaspoons of ghee are added to it. In case of
22. T. indica L. leaves 25 g are mixed with 15 g of
calf 40 pieces of black pepper are to be added. The
mustard (Brassica campestris L.) seeds and fed in
preparation is given 100g daily.
the morning for 3 days. Alternately, leaves are
11. Leaf Juice of Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. is mixed
boiled in water and fed to cattle.
with water and drenched 100ml. once daily for 2-3
Dysentery
days.
1.
12. Neem (A. indica A. Juss.) leaves and bark of
are ground and juice is extracted and mixed with
Coriandrum sativum L. are mixed and juice is extracted from the mixture and then 100ml of it is drenched everyday for 3-4days.
823
100-150 g of stems & leaves of Hemidesmus indicus honey and is fed to the animal.
2.
3 pieces of black pepper (P. nigrum), 2 teaspoonful ghee and 50 g smashed Glycyrrhiza glabra are
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Mishra,2013
3.
mixed with 250 ml cold water and drenched to the
medicines. Plants used were described with their
cattle.
botanical names followed by the common methods of
100 ml sap extracted from Centella asiatica,
their preparations using different parts and ingredients,
Coleus aromaticus Benth. and Cyanodon dactylon
dose and methods of their administration.
are drenched to the cattle for 2 - 3 days. 4.
5.
6. 7.
8.
9.
A total of 66 ethno-medicinal plant species
50 ml extract of Tagetes erecta shoot mixed with 50
belonging to 40 families distributed in 61 genera have
ml extract of Cyanodon dactylon are drenched to the
been recorded. The most dominant families in this study
animal for 3 - 4 days.
are Apiaceae (6), Poaceae (5), Caesalpiniaceae and
3 pieces of black pepper (P. nigrum) , 5 g C. carvi
Rutaceae (4 each), Fabaceae and Mimosaceae (3 each),
and 5 g of Swertia angustifolia are grounded and fed
Apocynaceae, Arecaceae, Combretaceae, Lamiaceae,
to the animal for 3 - 4 days.
Meliaceae, Solanaceae and Zingiberaceae (2 each) and
100 g bark of Bombax insigne is boiled in 500 ml of
the remaining families like Acanthaceae, Agavaceae,
water and then drenched to the animal.
Amaranthaceae,
Latex of Alstonia scholaris is mixed with black
Bom ba ca c ea e,
Br a ssi ca cea e,
Br om el ia cea e,
pepper (P. nigrum) in the ratio of 3:2 and given to
Chenopodiaceae,
Cucurbitaceae,
Dipterocarpaceae,
the animal.
Euphorbiacea e,
Bark of Butea monosperma is boiled with 250 ml of
Leguminosae,
water and filtered after cooling. The extract is
Myrsinaceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae,
drenched to the cattle.
Nymphaeaceae, Periploaceae, Piperaceae, Punicaceae,
200 g leaves of Andrographis paniculata and 100 g
Strychnaceae were represented with one species each.
leaves Centella asiatica are ground to paste and fed to the animal. 10. 100 ml extract of Holarhena antidysenterica leaves is drenched to the animal for 2-3 days. 11. Decoction of Acacia arabica root is mixed with
Asclepiadaceae,
Gentianaceae, Liliaceae,
Asteraceae,
Juglandaceae,
Moraceae,
Musaceae,
36 remedies use single plants and the rest 37 use more than one plant. Local population of the district use 22 preparations for diarrhoea followed by 12 for dysentery, 11 for constipation, 10 for Anorexia, 7 for Ascariasis, 6 for Coccidiosis and 5 for Coli-baciliosis
mustard Brassica campestris L. oil in the ratio of 1:3 and to be drenched to the animal. 12. 8-10 plants of Mentha spicata L. (Lamiaceae) are crushed to extract juice. 25 ml of juice is fed with salt in the mornings and evenings. DISCUSSION Traditional knowledge of rural communities of Ganjam has high ethnoveterinary importance. They utilize numerous plants and their various parts viz., roots, leaves, stems, barks, flowers, fruits and rhizome etc for various ethnoveterinary practices. In the present study seven common digestive tract ailments of domestic cattle are discussed in detail with the common herbal folkJournal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Figure 2. No. of plants and preparations used. 824
Mishra,2013 which are plotted in figure-2. All these remedies are
can be used in an integrated way to get better results. The
prepared with ingredients like water, common salt, black
traditional knowledge of medicine (folk-medicines)
salt, rice water, butter milk, jaggery, and ghee.
needs to be properly documented and validated. To
Similarly the methods of preparation of the
achieve this necessary awareness regarding their
above remedies fall into 9 categories such as solutions
applications, effectiveness, farming, conservation are
(23), paste (20), decoctions (7), solid (5), juice (3), bolus
absolutely required at the first hand.
(1), powder (1) and tincture (1) as presented in figure-3 . With regards to the prescriptions C. carvi is used
CONCLUSION
in 7 preparations for 6 diseases while P. nigrum in 9
Traditional herbal medicines are in use by most
preparations for 5 diseases. In the top of the list of plants
of the communities worldwide mainly among people of
that are used in preparations and for different diseases
the developing countries because they are cheaper, more
are Zingiber Officinale Rosc. 8 and 4, C citratus 6 and 5,
sustainable, readily available, and reliable as they are in
Brassica campestris L. var 4 and 4, respectively.
use traditionally, and frequent alternatives to modern
The THs and animal owners use different parts
veterinary medicines. The advantages of such medicines
of plants. Among these, leaves are most frequently used
are many and they are found to be time tested, socio-
(34) followed by seeds (28), whole plant (13), fruit and
economically related. Hence there is a growing need to
rhizome (10 each), bark and root (8 each), flower (4),
sum them up for any type of scientific validation.
latex and stem (2 each).(Figure-4)
(Varshneya, 2006)
During the course of study, the common experience
gained
regarding
the
Throughout the globe where traditional herbal
ethno-veterinary
treatment is in use it is found that the traditional healers
practices in the district are that, the modern veterinary
have their own way of identification and classification of
medicines (MVM) are beyond the reach of the natives
animal diseases as well as medicinal herbs, drug
due to their poor economic conditions. They frequently
preparation, dose and administration. It has almost
adopt EVM as the most appropriate method of treatment
become the first choice of the THs and animal owners
of many, if not all animal diseases. While for immediate
mostly due to their economic status and also easy
relief MVM is the best choice, but both EVM and MVM
accessibility of the herbs.
Figure 3. Categories of Preparations 825
Figure 4. Plant part used Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Mishra,2013 Local knowledge is at the local level and
Reports
regarding
the
require
present
sufficient
ethnoveterinary
investments should be concentrated in improving a range
preparations
of practices that are appropriate and sustainable.
pharmacognosical validation to provide wide-spread
(Caleb A. Cudi, 2003) EVM is the first choice of the
application
common people in the developing countries as MVM is
treatments to the economically poor farmers and animal
beyond the reach of the rural folk. It plays an important
keepers. (Mishra, 2011)
providing
much
biochemical cheaper
and
alternative
role in the day to day life of a common man which has strong background of belief, religion, and ancestral time-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
tested medicinal system. Plant preparations by the THs
The author is thankful to the informants and
and animal owners cost them much less than MVM and
traditional
healers
who
shared
their
traditional
they can prepare their own crude herbal medicines which
knowledge on medicinal uses in the field and Prof.
are safe and tested with the long trial and error based
Bhaskar Padhy (Retd.), Berhampur University for his
examinations. In this context Charaka can rightly be
guidance.
quoted here: “Yogadapi visham tikshnamuttamam bheshajam bhavet,
REFERENCES
Bheshajam chapi duryuktam tikshnam sampadhyte
Caleb A. Cudi. 2003. Ethno-Veterinary, complementary
visham.
and low cost treatment and management of working
Tasmannabhishaja yuktam yuktibahyen bheshajam,
animals, TAWS Workshop, Sisoe Research Institute,
Dhimta kinchidadeyam jivitarogyakankshina.” (Charak Samhita, 1(1):127 & 128) which says: “even venomous poison when administered properly can be used as medicines but when medicine is used improperly it becomes poison. Thus it is important for those who love life and good
UK. 1-10. http://www.taws.org. Chandel, KPS, Shukla G and Neelam S. 1996. Biodiversity in medicinal and aromatic plants in India. Conservation and utilization. NBPGR, New Delhi. 1239.
health not to take medicines from such vaidyas who are
District
not up to the mark in their medical profession.”
Directorate
Taking the above points into consideration, there is no doubt that among the large numbers of herbal preparations used by the indigenous practitioners during the past several centuries, there are many that deserve the reputation they have proved to be effective. Such preparations need to be investigated with modern technologies for their successful implementation in the practice of good health.
Statistical
Handbook
of Economics
and
Ganjam. Statistics,
2007. Orissa,
Bhubaneswar. Ganesh KS, Sundaramoorthy P, Chidambaram AA, Baskaran L. 2007. Folklore Value of weeds grown in the wastelands of Vedharanyam and Kodiakarai, Nagapattinam District of Tamilnadu. Ad. Plant Sci., 20 (2):551-553. Mathius-Mundy
E
and
McCorkle
CM.
1989.
Although the information gathered from the local
Ethnoveterinary medicine: An annotated bibliography.
traditional healers, in clinical terms, have tested the
Bibliographies in Technology and Social Change, No. 6.
medicinal value of these plant species for ages, yet their
Technology and Social Change Program, Iowa State
confidence regarding the medicinal value of these plant
University, Ames, Iowa, USA. 199.
species was not sufficient to validate their claims. Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
826
Mishra,2013 McCorkle CM and Green EC. 1998. Intersectoral health care delivery. Agric. Hum., 15(2):105-114. Mishra D. 2010. Ethno Veterinary practices among the rural people of Ganjam District (Orissa) India: A Case Study
On
some
Common
Veterinary
Ailments,
Webindia123 ). http://www. webindia123.com/health/article.asp? a_no=242&article=Ethno+Veterinary+practices+ among+the+rural+people+of+Ganjam+District+(Orissa) +India3A+A+Case+Study+On+some+Common+Veterin ary+Ailments Mishra D. 2011. Identification of some ethnoveterinary practices for treatment of foot and mouth disease in Polasara block, Ganjam District, Odisha, India. Journal of research in Biology, 1(7): 543-549 Saxena HO and Brahmam M. 1994-1996. The Flora of Orissa. Orissa Forest Development Corporation Ltd., Bhubaneswar. 1-4. Varshneya C. 2006. Ethno veterinary practices of India with particular reference to use of plant bio resources in animal health care. http://hillagric.ernet.in/edu/covas/ vph a r m a / wi n t er %20 s ch ool / l e ct ur es/ 33%20 Ethnoveterinary%20practices%20of%20India.pdf. Vijai DK. Sankar Ganesh P, Sundaramoorthy. 2009. Ethnobotanical Survey Of Plants Used For Respiratory Diseases, Recent Research in Science and Technology 1 (1):023-025. Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com Advantages
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
827
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 818-827
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
An assessment of Floristic Diversity of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India Authors: Harisha MN and Hosetti BB* . Institution: 1. Department of Post Graduate studies and research in Wildlife Management, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shankaraghatta- 577451, Shimoga, Karnataka.
ABSTRACT:
The plant resources of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary of Bellary district was studied and analyzed to decipher the information on the diversity, which revealed a total of 98 species of plants belonging to 85 genera and 37 families. The data collected was analyzed to determine important value index (IVI), Shannon Weinerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Index, Indices of species richness (R) and evenness (e). The objective of this work is to help foresters and ecologists by giving an account of floral status of the study area. The biodiversity of this area is threatened by cattle (livestock) grazing, water scarcity, mining and related problems. Hence, it is suggested to adopt strict control measures to protect and maintain the biodiversity in the Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, which will help to sustain the wild herbivore at sanctuary.
*Department of Post Graduate studies and research in Applied Zoology, Kuvempu University, Jnana Keywords: Sahyadri, ShankaraghattaMelursus ursinus, Flora, Cassia fistula, Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Deccan 577451, Shimoga, plateau. Karnataka.
Corresponding author: Hosetti BB.
Email: hosetti57@gmail.com
Article Citation: Harisha MN and Hosetti BB. An assessment of Floristic Diversity of Daroji Sloth bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India. Journal of Research in Biology (2013)3(2): 828-839 Dates: Received: 02 Feb 2013
Accepted: 09 Feb 2013
Published: 02 Apr 2013
Web Address: http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0330.pdf.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
828-839 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Harisha and Hosetti,2013 INTRODUCTION
STUDY AREA
The forest types in India ranged from thorny
The unique Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Hospet,
scrubby jungle to moist evergreen forest along with
in Bellary district is the only sanctuary located in North
moist grasslands and characteristic shola vegetation. In
Karnataka, situated between 15o 14' to 15o 17' N latitude
each of different types of forest, very diverse plants and
and 76o 31' to 76o 40' E longitude. It belongs to Deccan
faunal species are found growing naturally. Identification
Plateau scrub jungle with granite boulder outcrops.
of species and their diversity is a mammoth task and is
Renowned world heritage centre - Hampi is situated only
virtually impossible to have a complete inventory of
15
Indian biodiversity (Harisha et al., 2008). Due to
Government of Karnataka, in October 1994, declared
geographical variation, deccan plateau region of India
5,587.30 hectares of Bilikallu reserve forest as Daroji
possess great diversity in agricultural as well as wild
Bear Sanctuary. Since it has a suitable habitat for the
floral and faunal diversity (Khan, 2011). The Deccan
Indian Sloth Bears due to the rock-strewn hillocks, and
plateau region of Bellary in particular is highly over
characterized by vast stretches of undulating plains with
exploited by several anthropogenic activities, including
intermittent parallel chains of hills. The sanctuary lies at
different types of mining. The study site is naturally
an elevation of 647 m above mean sea level. The area
spread with hillocks, boulders, undulated terrain with
experienced high temperature with a maximum 43°C
sloppy lands covered with natural jungle scrub with
during January to May.
kilometers
away
from
this
sanctuary.
The
native herbs, shrubs, climbers and tree species. The main aim of sanctuary is to conserve and maintain the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
rich flora and fauna with reference to sloth bear,
Field data were collected in different seasons
Melursus ursinus and its food web present in Deccan
during January 2009- December 2011 in the study area
plateau region of Bellary.
stretching up to 4 km radius. The area is a long narrow
Since the Deccan plateau region is rich in
strip of hills with sandy and clay loams with rocky
biodiversity, highly exploited for the natural resources
mountain. The vegetation was analyzed by means of
resulting in threat to diversity and gene pool, nearly
10×10 m quadrates by random sampling to give most
600 tree species found in this region are facing threat of
representative composition of forestlands. Plant species
extinction (Khan, 2011). Studies of plant and avifaunal
collected in each quadrates were identified by consulting
diversity can be used to interpret the well being of forest
the Flora of Madras Presidency (Gamble, 1935).
ecosystem and also as an indicator of disturbance if any
DATA ANALYSIS
in the system. Long term management plan of forest
The data was analyzed for measuring the
ecosystem should incorporate the diversification of
Important Value Index (IVI), Shannon-Weiner Index
vegetation by using diversity indices. In order to
(H), Species richness Index (R), Species Evenness Index
understand the importance of a site it is necessary to
(E) and the Index of Dominance (ID). The values of
examine the significance in terms of the presence and
relative
abundance of species (Bruford, 2002). The present study
abundance were calculated following the methods of
attempts to understand the impact of changes in the
Shukla and Chandel (1980). The Shannon-Wiener Index
forest cover of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary due to
was calculated according to Michael (1990) as follows.
human activities.
Shannon Weiner’s Index
density,
relative
frequency
and
relative
(H') = ∑Pi ln Pi 829
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839 Alangiaceae Amaranthaceae Amaranthaceae Amaranthaceae Amaranthaceae Aristolochiaceae Asclepiadaceae Apocynaceae Apocynaceae Apocynaceae Asclepiadaceae Asclepiadaceae Asclepiadaceae Asclepiadaceae Liliaceae Asteraceae Asteraceae Asteraceae Asteraceae Capparaceae Capparaceae Capparaceae Cactaceae Celastraceae Fabaceae
Alangium salviifolium (L. f.) Wangerin, *
Amaranthus viridis L.*
Achyranthes aspera L. *
Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. ex Schult. *
Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss.
Aristolochia indica L. *
Calotropis gigantea (L.) W. T. Aiton *
Carissa carandas L. *
Hemidesmus indicus (L.) W. T. Aiton *
Wrightia tinctoria (Roxb.) R. Br. *
Cryptolepis buchananii Roem. & Schult. *
Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) Chiov. *
Leptadenia reticulata (Retz.) Wight & Arn. M
Tylophora indica (Burm. f.) Merr. *
Asparagus racemosus Willd. *
Ageratum conyzoides L. *
Parthenium hysterophorus L.
Tridax procumbens L. *
Cyanthillium cinereum (L.) H. Rob. *
Capparis divaricata Lam.
Capparis horrid
Capparis zeylanica L. *
Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw.
Gymnosporia montana (Roth) Bemth.
Cassia tora L. *
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Fabaceae
Acanthaceae
Lepidagathis cuspidata
2
Cassia absus L.
Acanthaceae
Barleria sp.
1
28
Family
Scientific Names
Sl.No
-
5
1
1
6
-
-
32
4
16
4
-
1
3
2
-
8
6
9
2
2
-
37
11
1
-
-
2
N
-
1
1
1
3
-
-
10
3
1
1
-
1
1
2
-
3
2
3
2
2
-
6
4
1
-
-
2
TO
-
12
12
12
12
-
-
12
12
12
12
-
12
12
12
-
12
12
12
12
12
-
12
12
12
-
-
12
TT
-
0.42
0.08
0.08
0.50
-
-
2.67
0.33
1.33
0.33
-
0.08
0.25
0.17
-
0.67
0.50
0.75
0.17
0.17
-
3.08
0.92
0.08
-
-
0.17
D
-
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.25
-
-
0.83
0.25
0.08
0.08
-
0.08
0.08
0.17
-
0.25
0.17
0.25
0.17
0.17
-
0.50
0.33
0.08
-
-
0.17
F
-
884.0
884.0
884.0
294.7
-
-
88.4
294.7
884.0
884.0
-
884.0
884.0
442.0
-
294.7
442.0
294.7
442.0
442.0
-
147.3
221.0
884.0
-
-
442.0
A
Table.1. Species composition and Importance Value in Daroji Sloth bear Sanctuary.
-
0.57
0.11
0.11
0.68
-
-
3.62
0.45
1.81
0.45
-
0.11
0.34
0.23
-
0.90
0.68
1.02
0.23
0.23
-
4.19
1.24
0.11
-
-
0.23
RD
-
1.39
1.39
1.39
4.17
-
-
13.89
4.17
1.39
1.39
-
1.39
1.39
2.78
-
4.17
2.78
4.17
2.78
2.78
-
8.33
5.56
1.39
-
-
2.78
RF
-
1.95
1.50
1.50
4.85
-
-
17.51
4.62
3.20
1.84
-
1.50
1.73
3.00
-
5.07
3.46
5.18
3.00
3.00
-
12.52
6.80
1.50
-
-
3.00
IVI
Harisha and Hosetti,2013
830
831
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
29
Anogeissus latifolia (Roxb. ex DC.) Wall. ex Guill. & Perr. Commelina benghalensis L. Cyanotis tuberosa (Roxb.) Schult. & Schultz.f. Ipomoea obscura (L.) Ker Gawl. Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. * Evolvulus alsinoides (L.) L. * Merremia tridentata (L.) Hallier f.) Trichosanthes sp. Diospyros paniculata Dalz. Kirganelia reticulata (Poir.) Baill.) * Euphorbia tirucalli L. * Abrus precatorius L. * Acacia catechu (L. f.) Willd. * Acacia leucophloea (Roxb.) Willd. Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile) Acacia sinuata auct.) Albizia amara (Roxb.) Boivin, * Albizia odoratissima (L. f.) Benth. Bauhinia racemosa Lam. Cassia auriculata L. * Cassia fistula L. * Crotalaria pallida Aiton Dalbergia lanceolaria L. f. Desmodium triflorum (L.) DC. Indigofera tinctoria L. Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers. * Mimosa pudica L. * Parkinsonia digitata Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Leucas aspera (Willd.) Link * Leucas stricta Benth. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Ocimum americanum L. * Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet Grewia hirsuta Vahl, Grewia damine Gaertn. Grewia tiliifolia Vahl. Commelinaceae Commelinaceae Convolvulaceae Convolvulaceae Convolvulaceae Convolvulaceae Cucurbitaceae Ebenaceae Phyllanthaceae Euphorbiaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Fabaceae Lamiaceae Lamiaceae Lamiaceae Lamiaceae Malvaceae Tiliaceae Tiliaceae Tiliaceae
Combretaceae 10 27 2 1 50 1 2 11 49 9 27 5 4 6 4 1 1 1 12 17 19 19 2 15 12 17 52 3 64 60 10
3 5 2 1 11 1 2 3 10 2 6 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 6 5 9 2 4 6 3 2 2 10 9 2
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
0.83 2.25 0.17 0.08 4.17 0.08 0.17 0.92 4.08 0.75 2.25 0.42 0.33 0.50 0.33 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.00 1.42 1.58 1.58 0.17 1.25 1.00 1.42 4.33 0.25 5.33 5.00 0.83
0.25 0.42 0.17 0.08 0.92 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.83 0.17 0.50 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.25 0.50 0.42 0.75 0.17 0.33 0.50 0.25 0.17 0.17 0.83 0.75 0.17
294.7 176.8 442.0 884.0 80.4 884.0 442.0 294.7 88.4 442.0 147.3 442.0 442.0 442.0 442.0 884.0 884.0 884.0 294.7 147.3 176.8 98.2 442.0 221.0 147.3 294.7 442.0 442.0 88.4 98.2 442.0
1.13 3.05 0.23 0.11 5.66 0.11 0.23 1.24 5.54 1.02 3.05 0.57 0.45 0.68 0.45 0.11 0.11 0.11 1.36 1.92 2.15 2.15 0.23 1.70 1.36 1.92 5.88 0.34 7.24 6.79 1.13
4.17 6.94 2.78 1.39 15.28 1.39 2.78 4.17 13.89 2.78 8.33 2.78 2.78 2.78 2.78 1.39 1.39 1.39 4.17 8.33 6.94 12.50 2.78 5.56 8.33 4.17 2.78 2.78 13.89 12.50 2.78
5.30 10.00 3.00 1.50 20.93 1.50 3.00 5.41 19.43 3.80 11.39 3.34 3.23 3.46 3.23 1.50 1.50 1.50 5.52 10.26 9.09 14.65 3.00 7.25 9.69 6.09 8.66 3.12 21.13 19.29 3.91
-
Harisha and Hosetti,2013
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Hibiscus lobatus (Murray) Kuntze Sida cordata (Burm. f.) Borss. Waalk. Sida cordifolia L. * Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. * Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels* Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers * Melia dubia * Ficus arnottiana (Miq.) Miq. Ficus benghalensis L. * Ficus racemosa L. * Ficus tomentosa Roxb. Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels * Boerhavia diffusa L. * Ximenia sp. Phyllanthus amarus Schumach. * Ziziphus jujuba Mill. * Borreria hispida (Linn.) K. Schum. Borreria stricta (L. f.) G. Mey. * Canthium parviflorum Lam. * Oldenlandia corymbosa L. Morinda tinctoria Roxb. maddi, ET * Morinda tomentosa B.Heyne ex Roth Pavetta indica L. Randia uliginosa (Retz.) Poir. Ixora brachiata Roxb. ex DC Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. * Ziziphus oenoplia (L.) Mill. Cardiospermum halicacabum L. * Sapindus trifoliatus L. * Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal * Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) Planch. * Tribulus terrestris L. * Malvaceae Malvaceae Malvaceae Malvaceae Apiaceae Menispermaceae Menispermaceae Meliaceae Moraceae Moraceae Moraceae Moraceae Myrtaceae Nyctaginaceae Olacaceae Phyllanthaceae Rhamnaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rubiaceae Rhamnaceae Rhamnaceae Sapindaceae Sapindaceae Solanaceae Ulmaceae Zygophyllaceae
1 1 2 6 1 6 4 1 1 3 1 4 8 3 2 5 4 3 1 1 2
1 2 4 15 1 14 7 2 1 5 20 28 42 11 20 22 13 5 1 1 3 884
12 12 12 12 12
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1.08 0.42 0.08 0.08 0.25
0.08 0.17 0.33 1.25 0.08 1.17 0.58 0.17 0.08 0.42 1.67 2.33 3.50 0.92 1.67 1.83 0.33 0.25 0.08 0.08 0.17
0.08 0.08 0.17 0.50 0.08 0.50 0.33 0.08 0.08 0.25 0.08 0.33 0.67 0.25 0.17 0.42 221.0 294.7 884.0 884.0 442.0
884.0 884.0 442.0 147.3 884.0 147.3 221.0 884.0 884.0 294.7 884.0 221.0 110.5 294.7 442.0 176.8 1.47 0.57 0.11 0.11 0.34
0.11 0.23 0.45 1.70 0.11 1.58 0.79 0.23 0.11 0.57 2.26 3.17 4.75 1.24 2.26 2.49 -
*=Medicinal plants, N-no of individuals, TO-transect occurred, TT=Total transect, D=Density, F=Frequency, A=Abundance, RD=Relative density RF=Relative frequency, IVI=Important value index; -tv =outside the quadrates .
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 5.56 4.17 1.39 1.39 2.78
1.39 1.39 2.78 8.33 1.39 8.33 5.56 1.39 1.39 4.17 1.39 5.56 11.11 4.17 2.78 6.94 7.03 4.73 1.50 1.50 3.12
1.50 1.62 3.23 10.03 1.50 9.92 6.35 1.62 1.50 4.73 3.65 8.72 15.86 5.41 5.04 9.43 -
Harisha and Hosetti,2013
832
Harisha and Hosetti, 2013 Where, Pi = No. of individuals of one species/total no of
(37 individuals), Vernonia cinerea (32 individuals),
individuals in the sample.
Borreria hispida (28 individuals), Acacia nilotica and
The indices of Species Richness (R) and Species
Cyanotis tuberose (27 individuals each) together
Evenness (E) were estimated using the following
accounting for 7% of the plot’s species and 25% of the
formulae.
stand density (226 individuals) represented this group.
R = (S-1)/log N
Fairly Common species (species with 5 to 24
E = (H')/ log S
individuals)
Where,
Thirty
species,
Morinda
tinctoria
(22),
S = Total no. of species,
Oldenlandia corymbosa, Phyllanthus amarus (20 each),
N =Total no. of individuals of all the species,
Indigofera tinctoria, Tephrosia purpurea (19 each),
(H')= Shannon Weiner’s index.
Desmodium trifoliate, Hyptis suaveolens (17 each), Parthenium
hysterophorus
(16),
Leucas
aspera,
RESULTS
Guazuma obscura (15 each), Cocculus hirsutus (14),
Floristic Structure: Species richness and Density
Ziziphus
The census of individuals in the study area
Leucas
maurtiana stricta
(13),
(12
Dalbergia
each),
lanceolaria,
Achyranthes
aspera,
resulted in 98 identified plant species which include 85
Euphorbia tirucalli, Canthium parviflorum (11 each),
genera and 37 families. Based on their density in the
Commelina
quadrate, species were grouped into following five
Carissa
categories:
Wrightia
tinctoria
Predominant species (species with ≥ 50 individuals)
Albizia
odoratissima,
Four species, Grewia hirsute (64 individuals) and
sinensis,
carandas,
Capparis
Grewia Acacia (8),
zeylanica
tiliifolia
leucophloea
Stephania each),
(9 each),
japonica
Hemidesmus
(6
(10 each), (7),
indicus,
Cassia
tora,
Grewia sp. (60 individuals), Ocimum americanum (52)
Acacia sinuate, Ziziphus oenoplia, and Boerhavia diffusa
and Evolvulus alsinoides (50 individuals) belonged to
(5 each), accounting for 30% of total species richness
this category representing 4% of the plot’s species and
and 39% of stand density represented this group and
26% of the plot’s density (242 individuals) (Table 1).
collectively they had 355 stems.
Dominant species (species with 25 to 49 individuals)
Common species (species with 1 to 4 individuals)
Seven species, Acacia catechu (49 individuals), Borreria
stricta
(42
individuals),
An overview of Sanctuary 833
Aerva
lanata
Thirty-one
species,
Ageratum
conyzoides,
Tridax procumbens, Albizzia amara, Bauhinia racemosa,
Sanctuary during summer Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Harisha and Hosetti,2013 Table.2. Family composition and Family Importance Value in Daroji Sloth bear Sanctuary. Sl. No 1
Family Acanthaceae
2
Alangiaceae
3
Amaranthaceae
4
Aristolochiaceae
5
Apocynaceae
6
Asclepiadaceae
7
Asparagaceae
8
Asteraceae
9
Capparaceae
10
Cactaceae
11
Celastraceae
12
Cesalpinaceae
13
Combretaceae
14
Convolvulaceae
15
Commelinaceae
16
Cucurbitaceae
17
Ebenaceae
18
Euphorbiaceae
19
Fabaceae
20
Lamiaceae
21
Malvaceae
22
Mackinlayaceae
23
Menispermaceae
24
Meliaceae
25
Moraceae
26
Myrtaceae
27 28
Leguminosae Nyctaginaceae
29
Olacaceae
30
Phyllanthaceae
31
Rhamnaceae
32
Rubiaceae
33
Rhamnaceae
34
Sapindaceae
35
Solanaceae
36
Ulmaceae
37
Zygophyllaceae
No. of species 2
No. of trees 3
1
1
4
49
1
2
0.2
1.0
5
25
2.8
5.1
7.8
4
7
0.8
4.0
4.8
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
4
56
6.2
4.0
10.2
3
8
0.9
3.0
3.9
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
2
6
0.7
2.0
2.7
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
4
53
5.8
4.0
9.9
2
37
4.1
2.0
6.1
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
2
13
1.4
2.0
3.5
17
178
19.6
17.2
36.8
4
96
10.6
4.0
14.6
9
160
17.6
9.1
26.7
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
2
21
2.3
2.0
4.3
1
2
0.2
1.0
1.2
4
4
0.4
4.0
4.5
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
5
0.6
1.0
1.6
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
20
2.2
1.0
3.2
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
8
126
13.9
8.1
21.9
2
18
2.0
2.0
4.0
2
2
0.2
2.0
2.2
1
1
0.1
1.0
1.1
1
2
0.2
1.0
1.2
1
3
0.3
1.0
1.3
99
909
100.0
100.0
200.0
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Relative Density
FIV
0.3
Relative Diversity 2.0
0.1
1.0
1.1
5.4
4.0
9.4 1.2
2.4
834
Harisha and Hosetti ,2013 (10.26). Family Composition Of the 37 families recorded (three unidentified), Fabaceae is the dominant based on the species richness with 17 species, followed by the Malvaceae, Rubiaceae with nine species each, Apocynaceae with five, Amarant haceae,
Asclepiadaceae,
Convolvulaceae, Lamiaceae and
Ast eraceae,
Moraceae with four
species each, following by Capparidaceae with three species, Acanthaceae, Cesalpinaceae, Commelinaceae,
Sloth bear at Sanctuary
Euphorbiaceae, Sida
cordifolia
Leptadenia
(4
reticulata,
each),
Abutilon
Tribulus
terrestris
indicum, (3each),
Menispermaceae,
Rhamnaceae
and
Sapindaceae with two species each, Alangiaceae, Ar ist o lochiaceae,
Asparagaceae,
Cact aceae,
Barleria sp., Aristolochia indica, Calotropis gigantea,
Celastraceae, Combretaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Ebenaceae,
Daemia extensa, Kirganelia reticulata, Mimosa pudica,
Mackinlayaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Olacaceae,
Melia dubia, Ipomoea obscura, Sida cordata (2 each),
Phyllanthaceae, Rhamnaceae, Solanaceae, Ulmaceae,
Cassia auriculata, Cassia fistula, Crotalaria pallida,
Zygophyllaceae and Meliaceae with one species each
Hibiscus lobatus, Centella asiatica, Syzygium cumini,
were recorded.
Sapi ndus
t rif oli at us,
somnif era,
Based on density, the top order of families were
Amaranthes viridis, Tylophora indica, Opuntia stricta,
Fabaceae (178 individuals), Malvaceae (160 individuals),
Gymnosporia
Rubiaceae (126 individuals), Lamiaceae (96 individuals),
montana,
Wi thania Cuscuta
reflexa
and
Trichosanthes sp. (1 each), accounting for 32% of total
Asteraceae
species richness and 7% of stand density represented this
individuals),
group and collectively they had 61 stems.
Commelinaceae (37 individuals), UK (26 individuals),
Rare species (species with â&#x2030;¤1)
Apocynaceae (25 individuals), Menispermaceae (21
Twenty-seven species making up 27% of the
(56
individuals),
Convolvulaceae
Amaranthaceae
individuals),
Phyllanthaceae
individuals),
Rhamnaceae
group.
individuals),
Capparidaceae
(8
Asclepiadaceae
(7
Nyctaginaceae
Di ospyros
latifolia,
pani culata,
Merremia Abrus
tridentate,
precatorius,
individuals),
(20
individuals),
total plotâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s species and 3% of stand density formed this Anogeissus
(18
(49
individuals),
(53
Euphorbiaceae
(13
individuals), (5
Parkinsonia digitata, Grewia damine, Ficus arnottiana,
individuals) and Moraceae (4 individuals), Two families
Ficus benghalensis, Ficus racemosa, Ficus tomentosa
were represented by three species such as Acanthaceae
individuals.
and Zygophyllaceae, four families were represented by
Based
Value,
two species such as Meliaceae, Aristolochiaceae,
Grewia hirsute figured on the top of top ten SIV
Sapindaceae and Ulmaceae, thirteen families were
hierarchy (21.13), followed by the Evolvulus alsinoides
represented by only one species, such as Asparagaceae,
(20. 93), Acacia catechu (19.43), Grewia sp. (19.29),
Cactaceae, Celastraceae, Combretaceae, Alangiaceae,
Vernonia cinerea (17.51), Borreria stricta (15.86),
C u c u r b it a c e a e ,
Tephrosia purpurea (14.65), Aerva lantana (12.52),
Mackinlayaceae, Myrtaceae, Olacaceae, Solanaceae and
Acacia nilotica (11.39) and Desmodium trifoliate
Rhamnaceae were recorded.
835
on
Species
Importance
E be na c e a e ,
L e g u m i no s a e ,
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Harisha and Hosetti, 2013 Based on FIV, Fabaceae (36.8) ranked highest among
families
followed
by
Malvaceae
(26.7),
64 plant species were enumerated, but in present study 98 plant species have been recorded. The study revealed
Rubiaceae (21.9) and Lamiaceae (14.6) (Table 2).
that the species composition and diversity of this
Diversity Indices
sanctuary can be compared with that of many other dry
The Shannon-Weiner’s diversity index was found be
forests
3.909 for the entire study area, and the Species Richness
(Krishnamurthy et al., 2010), Savanadurga State Forest,
index and Species Evenness index were found to be
Karnataka (Murali et al., 2003). Species richness of the
26.26, 2.03, respectively.
present study (99 species for individuals ≥ 1 cm) is
such
as
Bhadra
Wildlife
Sanctuary
closer to the species richness of the dry forests in Puerto Rico (50 species, Murphy and Lugo, 1986), but far less
DISCUSSION The study on the floristic diversity is one of the important factor to be analyzed to assess the diversity of
to the 133 species of Savanadurga State Forests of Karnataka (Murali et al., 2003).
a particular area as well as the diversity of the nation.
The Importance Value Index revealed that this
The assessment of diversity is also important during this
forest is dominated by relatively few species. The seven
period where the lot of plants and animals are in threats
species listed in top ten SIV hierarchy (Table 1)
due to the fragmentation of habitats and decline in
comprise about 33 % of the importance values, which
habitat quality (Kumar et al., 2000). The decline of
was 62 % in Bhadra Wildlife sanctuary followed by the
quality of habitat and fragmentation are mainly due to
dry forests in Puerto Rico (Murphy and Lugo, 1986) and
the anthropogenic activities including the conversion of
St. Lucia (Gonzalez and Zak, 1996) also recorded the
forest into agriculture land, developmental activities,
same observation with the seven most common species
mining etc. which affects on the landscapes and species
dominating the forests by comprising about 55% and
composition (Jerath et al., 2007).
67% of the total importance values, respectively.
Assessment
of
biodiversity
will
help
in
The Shannon-Weiner’s diversity index for the
understanding the inter-linkages between biological
area as a whole was found to be 3.909, the Species
resources and human being and which help in taking the
Richness index and Species Evenness index was found to
best decisions in conservation of natural resource and
be 26.26, 2.03, respectively. Rahlan et al. (1982) stated
development through sustainable utilization (Jerath et al.,
that higher the value of diversity, greater will be the plant
2007). This could be achieved only when the
community. So it can be stated that the vegetation in
quantification of existing resource is known and the
Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary is stable accordingly to the
requirements estimated. This is also true in case of wild
figures obtained after the data analysis (Table 1).
animals where the availability of food source is
The species rarity of the present study is 27%,
dependent on the population of those animals in the
which is very close to tree diversity of Little Andaman
forest. The existence of the diversity in particular area
Island with 34% (Rasingam and Parathasarathy, 2009),
also depicts the wild animals to be found in that
also close to the forests of Kuzhanthaikuppam of
particular forest area. In view of the above, the present
Coromandel Coast (31%, Parthasarathy and Karthikeyan,
study was investigated to know the floral diversity of the
1997), Malaysia (38%, Poore, 1968) and Barro Colorado
Daroji Sloth bear sanctuary.
island of Panama (40%, Thorington et al., 1982); but less
Previous studies conducted in this sanctuary by
than those of tropical dry deciduous forests of Bhadra
Neginhal et al. (2003) and Madhav Gadgil et al. (2011)
Wildlife Sanctuary (54.3%, Krishnamurthy et al., 2010).
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
836
Harisha and Hosetti, 2013 In tropical forests, the abundance and species richness
regions, or otherwise this may leads to the habitat
depend mostly on the soil type, moisture and distribution
fragmentation and destruction.
of rainfall (Durigon and Waechter, 2011). The present
Based on the present study there is a need to
study also revealed that the soil type and rainfall pattern
undertake
some
special
ecological
developmental
of the study area promotes the rich floral diversity
projects in the area which include water harvesting
indices (Shanon, 3.90). The plants enumerated during the
through assured tanks so that water would be available to
study also revealed that the diversity present in this area
wildlife during hot summer. Construction of boundary
greatly supports the food habitat of sloth bears and the
wall or fence around the protected area will reduce
vegetation pattern and geographical location also helps
poaching of wildlife, entry of domestic cattle for grazing
the sloth bears to live comfortably in this forest region.
and deforestation in the area.
The plant species like Grewia hirsute, Grewia hirsuta, Grewia damine, Ziziphus mauritiana, Grewia tiliifolia,
CONCLUSION
Syzygium cumini, Cassia fistula, Carissa carandas,
The study on the floral diversity of Daroji Sloth
Ziziphus oenoplia showed the density of 5.33., 5.00.,
Bear Sanctuary of Bellary district concludes that the
1.08., 0.83., 0.08., 0.08., 0.75 and 0.42 respectively.
richness and diversity in the area is mainly due to the
Some Ficus sp. also serves as the food for sloth bears.
climatological conditions prevailing there. The hard dry
The Shannon diversity indices of Western Ghats
condition and scarce rainfall have favored mainly thorny
(at different altitudes) according to Pascal is measured to
and shrubby plants to adopt and grow in such harsh
be in the range of 3.6-4.3 and the index is measured
terrain conditions and trees resulting in stunted growth.
about 2.01-3.7 in the wet evergreen forest of Coorg
The fruits, seeds and leaves are consumed by a variety of
district (Swamy et al., 2010). In the present study, the
birds and animals and thus are easily dispersed. The
Shannon diversity index is calculated to be 3.90, which
present study will provide the basic information on the
indicated that even though the forest type falls under the
present status and composition of tree species in a
dry deciduous forest, the diversity index can be largely
limited area.
compared to that of the evergreen forest. The present study signifies the long term monitoring of the
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
vegetation as well as the population of sloth bears in
Authors are thankful to Kiran, M.N, ACF,
accordance with the availability of food source and good
Ravindranath, I.R, RFO and forest watchers of Daroji
habitat. This type of studies greatly impact on the
Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Karnataka and all those who have
ecological balance between the vegetation pattern and
shared their information on the study area during the
the animal populations.
study period. M.N, Harisha is thankful to UGC, New
The floral diversity of the present study area also
Delhi for sanctioning fellowship (RGNF), to all
comprises as many as 65 species of medicinal plants
researchers from Panchavati Research Academy for
(Table.1). There is an urgent need to protect these
Nature (PRANA) Trust, Linganamakki, Sagara (TQ),
medicinal plants from grazing animals (sheep, goat),
Shivamogga and also to Kuvempu University for support
which are being forcibly invaded into the sanctuary by
and facilities.
the surrounding villagers. The vegetation and the wealth of this sanctuary need to be protected also from the
REFERENCES
mining (quarrying) which are being run nearby hillock
Bruford MW. 2002. Biodiversity-Evolution. Species,
837
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Harisha and Hosetti, 2013 Genes. Cited in; Conserving birdâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s biodiversity: General
Prema Iyer, Ramachandra TV, Yogesh Gokhale.
Principles and their Application. Cambridge University
2011. Checklist of Flowering Plants of Daroji Bear
press U.K. 1-19.
Sanctuary, Karnataka. Status of Karnataka Biodiversity.
Durigon
J
and
Waechter
JL.
2011.
Floristic
composition and biogeographic relations of a subtropical assemblage
of
climbing
plants.
Biodiversity
Conservation. 20(5):1027-1044. Gamble JS. 1935. Flora of the Presidency of Madras. (Vol1-4) Adlard and Son Limited 21, Hart Street. W.O. Gonzalez OJ and Zak DR. 1996. Tropical dry forest of St. Lucia, West Indies. Biotropica. 28: 618-626.
SAHYADRI E-NEWS: Issue XI. Sahyadri: Western Ghats Biodiversity Information System ENVIS @CES, Indian
Institute
of
Science,
Bangalore.
http://
www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/sahyadri_enews/ newsletter/issue11/hotspot/index.htm. Michael P. 1990. Ecological methods for field and laboratory investigations. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. Murali KS, Kavitha A and Harish RP. 2003. Spatial
Harisha MN, Ajay GA, Kumar MD. 2008. Floristic
Patterns of trees and shrub species diversity in
and avifaunal diversity of Jogimatti state forest,
Savanadurga State Forest, Karnataka. Current Science.84
Chitradurga, Karnataka. My forest. 44 (3): 225-235.
(6): 808-813.
Jerath N, Singh G, Singh CK and Alkesh S. 2007.
Murphy PG and Lugo AE. 1986. Structure and
Biological Diversity: The Very Stuff of Life. Punjab
biomass of subtropical dry forest in Puerto Rico.
Biodiversity Board, Punjab state council for science and
Biotropica. 18(2): 89-96.
technology, Chandigarh and UNESCO, New Delhi.
Neginhal SG, Harish R Bhat, Pramod S and Karthik
Khan MA. 2011. Promotion and conservation of native
G. 2003. Biodiversity Hotspot Report for Daroji Bear
flora and fauna in newly established agro-biodiversity
Sanctuary.
park in Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University,
sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue11/hotspot/hotspots/
Hyderabad. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 1
Daroji.htm.
(2): 150-157.
http://www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/
Parthasarathy
N
and
Karthikeyan
R.
1997a.
Krishnamurthy YL, Prakasha HM, Nanda A,
Biodiversity and population density of woody species in
Krishnappa M, Dattaraja, HS and Suresh HS. 2010.
a tropical evergreen forest in Courtallum reserve forest,
Vegetation structure and floristic composition of a
Western Ghats, India. Tropical Ecology. 38: 297-306.
tropical dry deciduous forest in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Karnataka, India. Tropical Ecology. 51(2): 235-246. Kumar A, Walker S and Molar S. 2000. Prioritisation of Endangered species. Setting Biodiversity conservation Priorities for India. Singh S, Sastry ARK, Mehta R and Uppal V. New Delhi, WWF-India. 2:341-425.
Parthasarathy N and Karthikeyan R. 1997b. Plant biodiversity inventory and conservation of two tropical dry evergreen forest on the Coromandel Coast, Southern India. Biodiversity and Conservation. 6: 1063-1083. Poore, MED. 1968. Studies in Malaysian rainforest. The forest on Triassic sediments in Jengka forest reserve. Journal of Ecology. 56: 143-196.
Madhav Gadgil, Geetha Gadagkar, Harish R Bhat, Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
838
Harisha and Hosetti, 2013 Rahlan PK, Saxena AK and Singh JS. 1982. Analysis of vegetation at and around Nainital Kumaun Himalaya. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. B. 48B:121-137. Rasingam L and Parathasarathy N. 2009. Tree species diversity and population structure across major forest formations and disturbance categories in Little Andaman Island, India. Tropical Ecology. 50(1): 89-102. Shukla, RS and Chandel PS. 1980. Plant Ecology. S. Chand and Company Ltd., New Delhi. 197. Swamy SL, Dutt CBS, Murthy MSR, Alka Mishra and Bargali SS. 2010. Floristics and dry matter dynamics of tropical wet evergreen forests of Western Ghats, India. Current Science. 99(3,10) : 353-364. Thorington Jr, Tannenbaum RWB, Tarak A and Rudran R. 1982. Distribution of trees on Barro Colorado Island: A five hectare sample. pp. 83-94. In: E.G. Leigh Jr., A.S. Rand & D.M. Windsor (eds.) The Ecology of a Tropical Forest-Seasonal Rhythms and Long-term
Changes.
Smithsonian
Institute
Press.
Washington, DC.
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com Advantages
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
839
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 828-839
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
Butterfly fauna of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India Authors: Harisha MN and Hosetti BB*. Institution: 1. Department of Post Graduate studies and research in Wildlife Management, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shankaraghatta- 577451, Shimoga, Karnataka.
ABSTRACT: Butterflies were enumerated during February 2010 to January 2012 using pollard walk method to assess the species diversity in the tropical thorn dry deciduous (Deccan Plateau) scrub jungle with granite boulder outcrop habitats of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Bellary District, Karnataka. This area, a total of 5,587.30 hectares is being proposed for the conservation of threatened species of Indian subcontinent the Sloth bear, Melursus ursinus and announded as a Sanctuary. A total of 41 butterfly species belonging to Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Lycaenidae and Nymphalidae families were recorded. Two species of butterflies recorded from this region have a protected status under the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Habitat destruction in terms of mining activity can be a potential threat to this area and is suggested to be the reason for the reduction of species richness and abundance of butterflies in impacted areas of the study site. This study provides support for long-term conservation of these fragmented scrub forest to ensure biodiversity protection.
* Department of Post Graduate studies and research in Applied Zoology, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, ShankaraghattaKeywords: 577451, Shimoga, Deccan Plateau, Hypolimnas misippus, Pachliopta hector, Karnataka. Lampides boeticus, Indian Wildlife Protection Act 1972, Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary.
Corresponding author: Hosetti BB.
Email: hosetti57@gmail.com
Article Citation: Harisha MN and Hosetti BB. Butterfly fauna of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Hospet, Bellary District, Karnataka, India. Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846 Dates: Received: 02 Feb 2013
Accepted: 09 Feb 2013
Published: 02 Apr 2013
Web Address: http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0331.pdf.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
840-846 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013 INTRODUCTION
The sanctuary located between 15°14' to 15°17' N
More than half of earth’s diversity comprises the
latitude and 76°31' to 76°40' E longitude at an elevation
insects. Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) plays an
of 647 m above mean sea level with the temperature
important role in both ecological and economical
ranged between 20°-43°C. The sanctuary is close to the
benefits to human beings. They increase aesthetic value
Hampi a renowned world heritage site in Bellary district.
and actively involved in pollination thus help in seed
Sanctuary area belongs to Deccan Plateau scrub jungle
setting of plants. Butterflies enhance earth’s beauty due
characterized by vast stretches of undulating plains with
to their diverse colors on their wings (May, 1992). Due
intermittent parallel chains of hills, mostly bare and
to their beauty and ecological significance butterflies are
stony, granite boulder outcrops. This habitat makes the
the well studied group throughout the world (Ghazoul,
sloth bears to live comfortably in unique geographical
2002). The habitat of butterflies is very specific and their
location.
occurrence is seasonal (Kunte, 1997). They are also considered as the good indicators of habitat quality
MATERIAL AND METHODS
including anthropogenic disturbances (Kocher and
A study of butterfly diversity was conducted
Williams, 2000). Butterflies always attracted the
from February 2010 to January 2012 to compare with
attention of researchers, ecologists and conservationist
earlier reports and to record their status and abundance.
by their community assemblage and the influencing
The survey was conducted to once in a month for a
factors.
period of two years from February 2010 to January 2012. Butterflies are broadly considered as potent
Butterflies were recorded by direct visual observation
ecological indicators (Erhardt, 1985; Brown, 1991;
and identified by using various field guides (Gay et al.,
Kremen, 1992) and are sensitive to the temperature,
1992; Antram, 2002; Wynter-Blynth, 1957, Kunte, 2000;
humidity, and light levels and also to the habitat
Sharma et al., 2005).
disturbance (Balmer and Erhardt, 2000). The relationship
The line transect method developed by the
between plants and butterflies is highly complex and
Institution of Terrestrial Ecology (Pollard, 1979) was
co-evolved (Ehrlich and Raven, 1964), since the
followed to monitor the diversity. The butterflies were
butterflies depend on plants for the food and completion
encountered along a fixed transect route of 2 km and
of their life cycle, contrary to this many of the
recorded regularly at an interval of every 15 day per
economically important plant species are pollinated by
month in the study period. Based on the visual
butterflies (Borges et al., 2003). In view of the above,
observation i.e., presence-absence scoring method
there is a need to conserve butterflies. Even though the
made during the entire study period. On the basis of
tropic is abund with diverse fauna including insects, the
percentage of occurrence the status of butterflies was
data on the diversity of insects both in natural and man
determined and categorized into three groups such 1-6%
made habitats still lacking. This situation prompted us to
as rare (R), 7-18% as Common (C) and >18% as very
document the butterfly diversity in Daroji Sloth Bear
common (VC).
Sanctuary India. STUDY AREA
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary (5,587.30 hectares)
The study revealed the presence of 41 species of
is unique sanctuary in Karnataka, and is the only
butterflies, belonging to five families. The family
sanctuary for sloth bear situated in North Karnataka.
Papilionidae is represented by 6 species; Lycaenidae 7
841
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013
Common Silverline Butterfly
Lemon Pansy Butterfly
species; Nymphalidae 15 species; Pieridae 12 species;
fragmentation, grazing pressure and change in land use
and Hesperidae by single species. The checklists of all
pattern are mainly responsible for diversity loss of both
the species observed with their status are given in
butterflies and plants. Along with the above, mining
Table 1. Out of 41 species recorded during the present
activity can also be treated as potential threat to
investigation, 28 species have already been reported by
biodiversity loss in this area. Lycaenidae family
Neginhal et al., (2003); Madhav Gadgil et al., (2011) and
members are largely affected both in terms of abundance
found during present study period. It is likely that many
and diversity since they feed on grasses, which is lost
more species could be added to the list on further
due to grazing.
exploration of this area. Analysis on the status of
Apart
from
butterflies,
other
threatened
butterflies shows that 15 were rare, 12 were common and
wildlife recorded in the study area during the present
14 were very common, similar pattern was reported in
survey
the Tiger-Lion Safari, Thyavarekoppa of Shimoga,
(Vulnerable; Garshelis et al., 2008), Indian Python,
Karnatka (Pramod et al., 2007).
Python molurus molurus and Jackal, Canis aureus and
were,
Sloth
Bear,
Melursus
ursinus
Butterflies are sensitive to changes in the habitat
Yellow-throated Bulbul, Pycnonotus xantholaemus a
and climate, which influence their distribution and
globally threatened species and restricted to the southern
abundance (Wynter-Blyth, 1957). Two specie viz,-
Deccan plateau (BirdLife International, 2001), Leopard
Pachliopta hector L and Hypolimnas misippus L
Panthera pardus listed as a "Near Threatened" species
recorded in this region have a protected status under the
on the IUCN Red List (Henschel et al., 2008). Indian
schedule I part IV of Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (Arora, 2003) and Lampides boeticus under Schedule IV (Gupta et al., 2005). Similar pattern has been reported from Melghat region of Maharashtra and
Ankua
Reserve
Forest
of
Jharkhand
(Mamata Chandraker et al., 2007) and Jogimatti state forest of Chitradurga (Harish et al., 2009). The
conservation
activities
such
as
the
monitoring and mapping of biodiversity played a key role in determining the status of the diversity (Margules
and
Pressey,
2000).
The
habitat
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
Peacock Pansy, Butterfly 842
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013
Sl.No
Table 1. List of butterflies along with their status in the Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Bellary. Status Common name Scientific name
Family: Papilionidae R Common Blue Bottle Graphium sarpedon (Linnaeus) VC Crimson Rose* Pachliopta hector (Linnaeus) R Common Rose Pachliopta aristolochiae (Fabricius) C Tailed Jay Graphium Agamemnon (Linnaeus) R Blue Mormon** Papilio polymnestor (Cramer) C Common Mormon Papilio polytes (Linnaeus) Family: Lycaenidae R 7 Common Silverline Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius) VC 8 Common Pierrot Castalius rosimon (Fabricius) VC 9 Common Cerulean Jamides celeno (Cramer) C 10 Dark Cerulean Jamides bochus (Stoll) VC 11 Dark Grass Blue Zizeeria karsandra (Moore) C 12 Pea Blue Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus) C 13 Grass Jewel Freyeria trochylus (Kollar) Family: Nymphalidae R 14 Common Castor Ariadne merione (Cramer) VC 15 Tawny Coaster Acraea violae (Fabricius) VC 16 Blue Tiger Tirumala linniace (Cramer) R 17 Plain Tiger Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) C 18 Striped Tiger Danaus genutia (Cramer) VC 19 Indian Common Crow Euploea core (Cramer) C 20 Danaid Eggfly** Hypolimnas misippus (Linnaeus) VC 21 Lemon Pansy Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus) C 22 Peacock Pansy Junonia almana (Linnaeus) C 23 Yellow Pansy Junonia hierta (Fabricius) C 24 Chocolate Pansy Junonia iphita (Cramer) R 25 Grey Pansy Junonia atlites (Linnaeus) VC 26 Common Evening Brown Melanitis leda (Linnaeus) VC 27 Common Sailor Neptis hylas (Moore) VC 28 Common Leopard Phalanta phalantha (Drury) VC 29 Common Four Ring Ypthima baldus (Fabricius) Family: Pieridae C 30 Indian Cabbage White Pieris canidia (Linnaeus) R 31 Crimson Tip Colotis danae (Linnaeus) VC 32 Pioneer Anaphaeis aurota (Fabricius) C 33 Common Emigrant Catopsilia Pomona (Fabricius) R 34 Common Jezebel** Delias eucharis (Drury) VC 35 Common Grass Yellow Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus) R 36 Great Orange Tip Hebomoia glaucippe (Linnaeus) R 37 White Orange Tip Ixias Marianne (Cramer) R 38 Yellow Orange Tip Ixias pyrene (Linnaeus) R 39 Large Salmon Arab Colotis fausta (Olivier) R 40 Small Salmon Arab Colotis amata (Fabricius) C 41 Common Wanderer Pareronia valeria (Joicey & Talbot) Family: Hesperiidae R 42 Indian Skipper Spialia galba (Fabricius) VC-Very common; C-Common; R-Rare, *-Endemic to Western Ghats; **-Endemic to Peninsular India and Sri Lanka 1 2 3 4 5 6
843
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013 Chameleon, Chamaeleo zeylanicus is listed in Schedule
New Delhi, 85pp.
II of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Balmer O and Erhardt A. 2000. Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grassland for central
CONCLUSION The presence of all these species indicates that
European
butterfly
communities:
Rethinking
this forest is rich and unique habitat that hold animal
conservation practices. Conservation Biology 14: 746-
diversity that is typical of ‘undisturbed tropical dry
757.
deciduous scrub forests’. Disturbances in the form of anthropogenic activities such as open cast mining,
Birdlife International. 2001. Threatened Birds of Asia.
construction of roads, movement of heavy vehicles,
BirdLife
firewood
International, Cambridge, U. K.: Birdlife International.
collection,
fragmentation,
etc.
can
result
population
loss
and
in
habitat
cause
International
Red
Data
Book.
Birdlife
local
extinctions that would seriously affect the distribution of
Borges RM, Gowda V and Zacharias M. 2003.
forest butterflies. Based on the results of this study, it is
Butterfly pollination and highcontrast visual signals in a
recommended that long-term conservation of these
low-density distylous plant. Oecologia. 136, 571-573.
fragmenting tropical Deccan scrub forest habitats in Bellary Forest Division is to protect the biodiversity
Brown KS. 1991. The conservation of insects and their
which can be achieved through ‘good mining practices’
habitats, pp. 350-403. In: Conservation of Neotropical
and strict vigilance.
Environments: Insects as Indicators. 15th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to ACF and RFO of Daroji Sloth Bear Sanctuary, Bellary Forest Division who have
Ehrlich PR and Raven PH. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in co-evolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
encouraged and directed this work from the beginning. I also thank the two forest watchers Putteshi and
Erhardt A. 1985. Diurnal Lepidoptera: Sensitive
Anjinappa for their support and assistance in the field.
indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland.
MNH is thankful to UGC, New Delhi for sanctioning
Journal of Applied Ecology. 22: 849-861.
(RGNF) Fellowship, to research team of Panchavati Research
Academy for
Nature
(PRANA)
Trust,
Garshelis DL, Ratnayeke S and Chauhan NPS. 2008.
Linganamakki, Sagar (Tq), Shivamogga for support and
Melursus ursinus. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List
also to Kuvempu University for facilities.
of
Thr eat en ed
Speci es.
Ver si on
2010. 2.
<www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 13 August REFERENCES
2010.
Antram CB. 2002. Butterflies of India. A Mittal Publication, New Delhi. 226pp.
Ghazoul J. 2002. Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in
Arora K. 2003. Forest Laws. The Wildlife Protection
Thailand. Biodivers Conserv. 11: 521-541.
Act, 1972 as amended by the Wild (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002. Professional Book Publishers, Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
844
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013 Gay TI, Kehimkar D and Punitha JC. 1992. Common
Karnataka.
Status
of
Karnataka
Biodiversity.
Butterflies of India. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
SAHYADRI E-NEWS: Issue XI. Sahyadri: Western Ghats Biodiversity Information System ENVIS @CES,
Gupta I J. and Mondal DK. 2005. Red Data Book, Part
Indian
Institute
of
Science,
Bangalore.
http://
II: Butterflies of India. Zoological Society of India,
www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/sahyadri_enews/
Kolkata.
newsletter/issue11/hotspot/index.htm.
Harish MN, Hosetti BB and Shahnawax A. 2009.
Mamata Chandraker, Sachin Palekar and Sangita
A checklist of Butterfly from Jogimatti State Forest,
Chandrakar. 2007. Butterfly Fauna of Melghat Region,
Chitradurga, Karnataka. Journal of Insect environment.
Maharashtra. Zoos’ Print Journal. 22(7): 2762-2764.
15(3):113-116. Margules CR and Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic Henschel P, Hunter L, Breitenmoser U, Purchase N, Packer C, Khorozyan I, Bauer H, Marker L, Sogbohossou E, Breitenmoser-Würsten C. 2008. "Panthera pardus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature.
and species diversity in four tropical habitats in the northern Western Ghats. J. Biosci. 22: 593-603.
Indian
lipid reserves in two nectarivorous butterflies. Ecol.73 (6): 2181-2191.
Academy
of
G. 2003. Biodiversity Hotspot Report for Daroji Bear Sanctuary.
http://www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/
sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue11/hotspot/hotspots/ Daroji.htm.
Kunte K. 2000. India-A Life scape Butterflies of India.
May PG. 1992. Flower selection and the dynamics of
Neginhal SG, Harish R Bhat, Pramod S and Karthik
Kunte K. 1997. Seasonal patterns in butterfly abundance
Peninsular
conservation planning. Nature. 405: 243-253.
Sciences,
Bangalore, Universities Press. 270pp. Kocher SD and Williams EH. 2000. The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies, vary with habitat disturbance and geography. J. Biogeogr. 27: 785794. Kremen C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural area monitoring. Ecological Applications 2: 203-217. Madhav Gadgil, Geetha Gadagkar, Harish R Bhat, Prema Iyer, Ramachandra TV, Yogesh Gokhale.
Pramod Kumar MPM, Hosetti BB, Poornesha HC and Raghavendra Gowda HT. 2007. Butterflies of the Tiger-Lion Safari, Thyavarekoppa, Shimoga, Karnataka. Zoos’ print Journal. 22(8):2805. Pollard E. 1979. A national scheme for monitoring the abundance of butterflies. The First Three Years British Entomological and Natural History Society. Proceedings and Transations. 12:77-99. Sharma RM and, Radhakrishna C. 2005. Insecta: Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera and Grypocera) Fauna of Melghat Tiger Reserve Conservation Area Series, 24. Aoological Survey of India, Kolkata. 377-400.
2011. Checklist of Butterflies of Daroji Bear Sanctuary, 845
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
Harisha and Hosetti., 2013 Wynter-Blynth MA. 1957. Butterflies of the Indian Region, Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay-523. 72.
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com Advantages
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 840-846
846
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research
Journal of Research in Biology
Toxicity of copper to tropical freshwater snail ( Pila ovata) Authors: Ariole CN1 and Anokwuru B2. Institution: 1. Department of Microbiology, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B 5323, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. 2. School of Science Laboratory Technology, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B 5323, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
ABSTRACT: The potential toxicity of copper to freshwater snail (Pila ovata) was investigated in a static renewal bioassay for 96 hours. Chemically pure salts of copper sulphate (CuSO4. 5H2O) dissolved in distilled water was used as toxicant. Five copper ion concentrations with a control group were prepared. The LC50 at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h was 4.67, 2.12, 1.64 and 0.59 mg/l respectively. The LT50 of copper concentrations of 0.05 mg/l, 0.1 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l, 1.0 mg/l and 2.0 mg/l were 123.86 h, 97.20 h, 83.33 h, 75.32 h and 60.04 h respectively. No death was recorded in the controls. Survival time decreased with increasing concentrations of copper ion. The results showed that copper is toxic to Pila ovata and could pose serious threat to their survival in natural environment.
Corresponding author: Ariole CN.
Keywords: Copper toxicity, freshwater snail, median lethal concentration, median lethal time.
Email: cnariole@yahoo.com
Article Citation: Ariole CN and Anokwuru B. Toxicity of copper to tropical freshwater snail (Pila ovata) Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 847-851
Web Address:
http://jresearchbiology.com/ documents/RA0334.pdf.
Dates: Received: 07 Feb 2013
Accepted: 13 Feb 2013
Published: 03 Apr 2013
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Research in Biology An International Scientific Research Journal
847-851 | JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 2
www.jresearchbiology.com
Ariole and Anokwuru., 2013 ecological importance, availability and ease of handling
INTRODUCTION Freshwater molluscs play an important role in
(Fuller et al., 2004). Although the tests are laboratory
aquatic ecosystems, providing food for many fish species
based, simple, of single variable and do not necessarily
and vertebrates (Maltchik, et al., 2010). Pila ovata, a
simulate the field situations, they nonetheless provide
tropical freshwater snail, is among the molluscan
useful information on the potential of the pollutant to
seafoods that are widely distributed in streams, lakes
harm the biota (Akbari et al., 2004).
and rivers across the southern rain forests in Nigeria
The toxicity of copper to aquatic organisms such
(Ariole and Ezevununwo, 2013). It serves as a major
as tropical freshwater prawn (Kaoud, 2013) and fish
source of protein as well as generating income to the
(Olaifa et al., 2004; Abou El-Naga et al., 2005;
people.
Stasiūnaitė, 2005; Mickėniėnė et al., 2007) have been The contamination of freshwater with a wide
range of pollutants has become a matter of concern over
reported. There is dearth of information on the toxicity of copper to mollusc, Pila ovata.
the last few decades (Vutukuru, 2005). Chemicals
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate
derived from agricultural operations (pesticides and
the potential toxicity of copper to freshwater snail
herbicides) and industrial effluents, such as metals,
(Pila ovata) so as to ascertain its level of tolerance and
ultimately find their way into a variety of different water
its suitability as bio-indicator in freshwater environment.
bodies and can produce a range of toxic effects in aquatic organisms (Al-Kahtani, 2009). Copper
salts
(copper
MATERIALS AND METHODS hydroxide,
copper
Pila ovata was collected from Okpuhur Creek in
carbonate and copper sulphate) are widely used in
Ahoada, Rivers State, Nigeria. The snails were
agriculture as fungicide, algaecide and nutritional
handpicked and placed in a plastic bucket containing
supplement in fertilizers. They are also used in veterinary
habitat water. On reaching the laboratory, active snails
practices and industrial applications. Copper sulphate is
were selected for acclimatization for 10days at room
released to water as a result of natural weathering of soil
temperature (APHA, 1998) in a vessel containing habitat
and discharge from industries, sewage treatment plants
water.
and agricultural runoff. Copper sulphate is also
Chemically pure copper sulphate (CuSO4 . 5H2O)
intensively introduced in water reservoirs to kill algae.
dissolved in distilled water was used as a stock solution.
Thus, excessive amount of copper accumulates in water
The required concentration was calculated according
bodies and cause toxicity of aquatic fauna and flora
to the amount of copper ions. Five concentrations
(Kaoud, 2013). Copper is essential for the normal growth
(0.0 mg/l), 0.05 mg/l, 0.1 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l, 1.0 mg/l and
and metabolism of nearly all organisms including
2.0 mg/l) were prepared using water from the habitat of
mollusc. However, when biological requirements are
the snail as diluent. The control was dilution water
exceeded, this metal can become harmful to aquatic biota
without toxicant. A preliminary range finding test
(Hall et al., 1997).
(Rahman et al., 2002) was first performed to determine
Acute toxicity bioassay are widely used to assess
the concentrations used in the definitive tests. The 96 h
the effects of pollutants on one or more organisms
acute toxicity bioassay was carried out using the
usually based on the determination of acute lethal
procedure of APHA (1998). Triplicate sets of glass tanks
toxicity and sub-lethal toxicity test using sensitive
(29 x 29 x 30 cm) for each copper concentration were
species or organisms based on their economic and
employed. Ten snails of fairly equal sizes were
848
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 847-851
Ariole and Anokwuru., 2013 handpicked and carefully transferred into each test tanks.
increased. The LT50 for freshwater snail in different
Mortality was recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours of
copper ion concentrations are shown in Table 2 and
exposure time as described by Odiete (1999). Dead snails
Figure 2. There is negative correlation between the LT 50
were removed at each observation and the test solution in
values and copper ion concentrations; when the copper
each tank was renewed every 24 h. The test was
ion concentrations levels decrease, LT50 values increased
terminated after 96 h and repeated three times to confirm
(Table 2 and Figure 2). The survival percentages were
the data.
found to be significantly different from each other as
Data analysis
shown in Table 3.
Probit analysis (Sprague, 1973) was used to
The LC50 of copper vary considerably when
transform each test concentration and the corresponding
previous reports on fish species are compared and also
percentage mortality. The method described by Finney
with LC50 values obtained in this study. The 96 hr LC50
(1971) was used to determine the median lethal
values of copper ions for rainbow trout (GĎ&#x2039;ndoÄ&#x;du,
concentration (LC50) and median lethal time (LT50). The
2008), Mugil seheli (Abou El-Naga, 2005) and
number of survivors in different concentrations of copper
Macrobrachium
was tested for significant differences using one way
0.094 mg/l, 1.64 mg/l and 0.35 mg/l respectively. The
analysis of variance (ANOVA).
variation in the LC50 values for the same metal may be
rosenbergii
(Kaoud,
2013)
were
due to species type, chemical structure of metal compound, the conditions of the experiment (water
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The
probit
with
temperature, salinity, oxygen content and pH) and
increasing copper ion concentrations as shown in Figure
geographical regions. That is why the data obtained in
1. No mortality occurred in the control group. The
different countries can hardly be extrapolated to local
relationships between copper concentrations and probit
conditions. Therefore, experimental work is needed to
mortality were analysed. The results in basic correlation
obtain the data corresponding to the conditions of the
analysis
given region.
illustrated
mortality rate
a
positive
increased
linear
relationship
(Figure 1). The 24, 48, 72 and 96 h LC50 of copper to
The results of this study indicated that mortality
Pila ovata were 4.67, 2.12, 1.64 and 0.59 respectively
and time were influenced by the concentration levels of
(Table 1). The result showed that the LC50 value of
copper and that copper is toxic to Pila ovata. It has been
copper ion to Pila ovata decreased as the exposure time
reported that Pila ovata is capable of bioaccumulating
Figure 1: Median Lethal Concentration (LC50) of Copper to Pila ovata
Figure 2: Median Lethal Time (LT50) of Copper to Pila ovata
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 847-851
849
Ariole and Anokwuru., 2013 Table 1: Median lethal concentration (LC50) of copper to Pila ovata Time (hr) 24 48 72 96
LC50 (mg/l) 4.67 2.12 1.64 0.59
Table 2: Median lethal time (LT50) of copper to Pila ovata Concentration (mg/l) 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0
Time (hr) 123.86 97.20 83.33 75.32 60.04
trace metals (Ezemonye et al., 2006). This poses health
(2):60-71.
issue when consumed by human. Therefore, caution
Akbari S, Law AT and Shariff M. 2004. Toxicity of water soluble fractions of crude oil to fish, Lutjanus argentimaculatus and shrimp, Penaeus monodon. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology 28:169-175.
should be exercised against water source contamination and exposure to fertilizer and industrial pollution which could pose serious threat to their survival in natural environment.
Al-Kahtani MA. 2009. Accumulation of heavy metals in Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus from Al-Khadoud spring, Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia, American Journal of Applied sciences 6(12):2024-2029. APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Figure 3: Minimum lethal concentration and minimum lethal time of copper to Pila ovata Table 3: Survivors of Pila ovata exposed to different concentrations of copper Concentration (mg/l)
Survival (%) (Mean ±S.D)
Control (0) 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0
100a ± 0.00 60b ± 0.67 46.67c ± 0.67 36.67d± 0.67 30e ± 0.67 23.33f ± 0.67
Mean values which do not have the same superscript letter are significantly different (p<0.05) REFERENCES Abou El-Naga EH, El-Moselhy KM and Hamed MA. 2005. Toxicity of cadmium and copper and their effect on some biochemical parameters of marine fish Mugil seheli. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 31 850
Ariole CN and Ezevununwo O. 2013. Acute toxicity of dichlorvos on tropical freshwater snail (Pila ovata). International Journal of Biosciences 3(1):70-75. Ezemonye LIN, Enobakhare V and Ilechie I. 2006. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Fe) in freshwater snail (Pila ovata; Oliver 1804) from Ikpoba River of Southern Nigeria. Journal of Aquatic Sciences 21(1):23-28. Finney DJ. 1971. Probit Analysis. 3rd edition Cambridge University Press, London, 333. Fuller J, Bonner J, Page C, Ernest A, McDonald T and McDonald S. 2004. Comparative toxicity of oil, dispersant and oil-plus-dispersant to several marine species. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23(12):2941-2949. Gϋndoğdu A. 2008. Acute toxicity of zinc and copper for rainbow trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss). Journal of Fisheries Sciences.com 2(5):711-721. Hall LW, Scott MC and Killen WD. 1997. Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in the surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 847-851
Ariole and Anokwuru., 2013 Toxicology and Chemistry 17(6):1172-1189. Kaoud HA. 2013. Effect of copper intoxication on survival and immune response in tropical freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. In : Eds. Bhart PK, Chauhan A and Kaoud HA. Aquatic Biodiversity and Pollution. Discovery Publishing House PVT. LTD., New Delhi. 38-48. Maltchik L, Stenert C, Kotzian CB and Pereira D. 2010. Responses of freshwater molluscs to environmental factors in southern Brazil wetland. Brazilian Journal of Biology 70(3):473-482. Mickėniėnė L, Šyvokienė J and Stasiūnaitė P. 2007. The effect of copper ions on the growth and bacterial abundance in the intestinal tract of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) larvae. Acta zoologica Lithuanica 17(1):16-22. Odiete WO. 1999. Environmental Physiology of Animals and Pollution. Diversified Resources, Ltd., Lagos, Nigeria. Olaifa FG, Olaifa AK and Onwude TE. 2004. Lethal and sublethal effects of copper to the African cat fish (Clarias gariepinus). African Journal of Biomedical Research 7:65-70. Rahman MZ, Hossain Z, Mollah MFA and Ahmed GU. 2002. Effect of diazinum60EC on Anabas testudineus, Channa punctatus and Barbodes gonionotus “Naga’’. The ICLARM Quarterly 25:8-12. Sprague JB. 1973. The ABCs of pollutants bioassay using fish. In: Biological methods for assessment of water quality Cairns JJr. and Dickson, KL. (eds.), ASTM Special Tech. Public. 528:6-30. Stasiūnaitė P. 2005. Toxicity of copper to embryonic development of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Acta zoologica Lituanica 15(3):259-265. Vutukuru SS. 2005. Acute effects of hexavalent chromium on survival, oxygen consumption, hematological parameters and some biochemical profiles of the Indian major carp, Labeo rohita. Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2(3):456462.
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com Advantages
Easy online submission Complete Peer review Affordable Charges Quick processing Extensive indexing You retain your copyright submit@jresearchbiology.com www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(2): 847-851
851
Guidelines for Authors
The article should be addressed to "The Editor". Submission of an article implies that it has never been published in any other journals and if accepted, it will not be publi shed elsewhere. All papers are first reviewed by the editor. Papers found lacking will not be considered. Others will be sent for a detailed peer-review process. Journal Manuscript Format The manuscript should be typed in â&#x20AC;&#x153;Times new Romanâ&#x20AC;? font with font size 11 and 1.5 line spacing. The page size should be strictly A4. All images should be in JPEG format. The article is to be submitted should accompany a covering letter with name and complete address (including Telephone Number and e-mail ID) of the author/s. The completed article should be sent to submit@jresearchbiology.com Title The title should briefly identify the subject and indicate the purpose of the document. The title should supply enough information for the reader to make a reliable decision on probable interest. Do not use all caps; instead use caps only at the first word of the title and/or at scientific names, abbreviations etc., Center the authors' initials and last names directly below the title. Abstract The abstract should include a hypothesis or rationale for the work, a brief description of the methods, a summary of the results, and a conclusion: The abstract should be less than 250 words. Do not include literature citations or references to tables, figures or equations. Keywords A short list of keywords or phrases should be included immediately after the abstract as index words. Choose keywords that reflect the content of your article. Note that words in the title are not searchable as keywords unless they are also included in the keyword list. Body of the Article The introductory section of the text should include a brief statement of why the research was conducted. It should also define the problem and present objectives along with a plan of development of the subject matter. The introductory section also usually includes a brief survey of the relevant literature on the topic. Materials and Methods Provide sufficient detail so that the work may be repeated. Do not give details of methods described in readily available sou rces. Instead, refer to the source and describe any modification. Figures that illustrate test apparatus and tables of treatment parameters or equipment specifications are appropriate here. Results and Discussion This section describes the solution to the problem stated in the introductory section. Use figures and tables to visually supplement the presentation of your results. The text must refer explicitly to all visuals, and you must interpret the visual elements to emphasize the evidence on which your conclusions are based. Do not omit important negative results. In addition, relate your findings to previous findings by identifying how and why there are differences and where there is agreement. Speculation is encouraged, but it must be identified. Conclusion This is a summary of your results. In this section, state any conclusions that can be drawn from your data. You may also include suggestions for future research. The conclusion may be a subsection of the Results and Discussion section, or it may be a separate section. Data or statements cited in your conclusion must have been stated previously in the article. Do not introduce new information in the conclusion. Acknowledgement Acknowledgements are optional. Use them to thank individuals or organizations that provided assistance in materials, expertise, or financing. The acknowledgements will appear at the end of the text and should be limited to one or two sentences. References All sources cited in the text must be listed in the References, and all documents listed in the References must be cited in the text. Accuracy of citation is the author's responsibility.
Reference Style References should be cited in the text in the form (Author et al, 1987) and listed in alphabetical order at the end of the article as follows: Schernewski G, Neumann T. The trophic state of the Baltic Sea a century ago: a model simulation study. J Mar Sys. 2005;53:109–124. Kaufman PD, Cseke LJ, Warber S, Duke JA and Brielman HL. Natural Products from plants. CRC press, Bocaralon, Florida. 1999;15-16. Kala CP. Ecology and Conservation of alphine meadows in the valley of flowers national park, Garhwal Himalaya. Ph.D Thesis, Dehradun: Forest Research Institute, 1998;75-76. http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/pdf/1746-4269-1-11.pdf. Appendix Use an appendix for material that is too long to include in the text of the article. Manuscript Charges Journal of Research in Biology is an International Research Journal. This Journal provides immediate access to all published full-text articles to interested readers from all around the world. The availability of the author’s paper makes the scientific community to understand and develop an impact in the concerned research field. It also increases the chance of more citations of the published work, which in turn can be translated into more recognition of research. This journal also accelerates research and knowledge building worldwide. Publishing an article in Journal of Research in Biology requires payment of the manuscript processing charges, once the manuscript is accepted for publication. The payment is to be made by one of the authors, their university/organization, or funding entity. The manuscript processing charges are fixed so as to allow publishers to recover manuscript processing expenses and the cost of making the full-text available on the Internet to all interested researchers. For Indians The charges for submission of a Research article is Rs 2100, up to 8 pages and for more pages, each page costs Rs 250. For Foreign nationals The charges for submission of a Research article is USD 100, up to 8 pages and for more pages, each page costs 15 USD. Copyright Authors who publish in Journal of Research in Biology retain the copyright of their work which allows the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of an article in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. If you have any queries kindly contact us at contact@jresearchbiology.com Hard copy subscription of the Journal is available. Kindly subscribe it for your laboratory. Subscription Rates For India:
Other countries
One Year
: Rs 1000
One Year
: $120
Six Months
: Rs 600
Six Months
: $65
Three Months : Rs 300
Three Months : $35
Eight Issues per year will be produced and sent to your perusal. All overseas address is served by Airmail. Send subscription to: Bioindica and Company, No 4, 108/A, 6th street, Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India – 627 007. Ph No: 0462-2534033 Payment mode: You can take a Demand Draft/ Cheque in favour of D. Abiya Chelliah Payable at State Bank of India, St. Xavier’s College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India-627002. Kindly inform us through contact@jresearchbiology.com on doing your payment for subscription.