High Performance

HIGH PERFORMANCE

EXPERIENCE

ZGF Architects LLP (ZGF) is an award-winning architectural, planning, and interior design firm with offices in Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and New York.

Our portfolio features a diverse mix of projects for both private and public institutions, including work for healthcare, research, academic, civic, corporate, and commercial clients.

ZGF has been an industry leader and pioneer in sustainable design. Over 25 years ago, we designed a headquarters building for the Bonneville Power Administration to use 50% less energy than its counterparts, which was selected by the GSA to serve as a national prototype for high-performance office building design. ZGF also designed the first double LEED-Platinum certified laboratory building. Since then, with over 150 LEED Accredited Professionals on staff, the firm has designed over 65 projects nationally that have been, or are registered to be, LEED-Platinum, -Gold, or -Silver certified. Additionally, a half dozen of our projects are pursuing performance standards that exceed the ambitions of LEEDPlatinum, and could be best defined by the Cascadia Region Green Building Council’s “Living Building Challenge” program, which requires projects to be net-zero energy, netzero water, and utilize site and material impact-neutral design. ZGF is committed to the 2030 Challenge, an initiative stating that all new buildings and major renovations reduce their fossil-fuel consumption by 2010, and incrementally increasing the reduction for new buildings to carbon neutral by 2030. Additionally, the firm is working with a number of universities who are signatories of the American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment to develop long-range sustainable design strategies for their campuses.

Our sustainable design excellence has been recognized by numerous sustainable and high-performance design awards programs through the AIA, IIDA, EPA, DOE, GSA, American Public Transit Association, Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, State and Local government agencies, and utilities across the country.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA DONALD BREN SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT Santa Barbara, California

ZGF DESIGNED THE DONALD BREN SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT WHICH WAS ONE OF THE FIRST BUILDINGS IN THE UNITED STATES TO BECOME LEED-PLATINUM CERTIFIED, AND IS THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA’S FIRST GREEN BUILDING.

It has also become the nation’s first building to earn two LEED-Platinum certifications, for both New Construction and Existing Building. The building surpasses code requirements for energy efficiency standards by more than 31%. To reduce heat-island effect, a special roofing material was installed to help keep the building cool. In addition, the Bren School was sited to harvest natural light. The office wing relies on natural ventilation with operable windows and transoms instead of air conditioning.

Daylight harvesting is coupled with a lighting plan that incorporates energy efficient fixtures and bulbs, and controls for motion and ambient light. A roof-integrated photovoltaic system was installed that allows 7 to 10% of the power to be generated cleanly on site during the warmest months. The project also pursued alternative power sources, such as fuel cells which were generously donated. The focus of the design was to create a building that would facilitate interaction through state-of-the-art research and teaching laboratories, faculty and administrative offices, conference and seminar rooms, and outdoor seating.

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MOLECULAR ENGINEERING & SCIENCES BUILDING

ZGF PROGRAMMED AND DESIGNED THE NEW MOLECULAR ENGINEERING & SCIENCES BUILDING, WHICH PROVIDES CRITICAL RESEARCH SPACE FOR THE DESIGN, DISCOVERY, AND ENGINEERING OF COMPLEX MOLECULAR SYSTEMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS.

The two-phased project accommodates growth in molecular engineering; responds to the evolving interdisciplinary nature of teaching and research; and fits within a historic, high-density area of the campus.

Research will lead to new discoveries with beneficial implications for major societal challenges ranging from energy, sustainability, and information technology to affordable and effective healthcare. The 90,000 SF Phase 1 building provides space to support a wide range of wet laboratory uses, including fume

Seattle, Washington

hood-intensive chemistry. The design takes advantage of the topography of the site to provide ground and basement level instrumentation laboratories (the largest on the West Coast) with ultra-low vibration and electromagnetic interference requirements, allowing the research laboratories to be above-grade to take advantage of daylight and views. Pursuing LEED-Gold certification, sustainable design highlights include the first laboratory building on campus with a naturally ventilated office component, optimized laboratory ventilation, use of highly energy efficient chilled beams, and a green roof. Phase 2 design has been completed and will provide an additional 70,000 SF.

CENTRE CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION / CITY OF SAN DIEGO SAN DIEGO CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX / CITY HALL

CENTRE CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, HELD A DESIGN COMPETITION FOR A NEW THREE PHASE, 3,000,000 SF MIXED-USE AND CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX IN THE HEART OF SAN DIEGO’S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. ZGF, TEAMED WITH GERDING EDLEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, SOUGHT TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS OF THIS PUBLIC / PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP BY PROVIDING NEW ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES FOR THE CITY, AND DEVELOPING AN EXCITING HIGH-DENSITY, URBAN MIXED-USE COMPLEX ON FOUR PRIME CITY BLOCKS IN DOWNTOWN SAN DIEGO.

The team’s plan was selected based on a design that includes opening up the site, and allowing the now blocked vistas to be reclaimed and reconnected

San Diego, California

to the urban fabric. The plan proposes reopening B Street and Second Avenue between A and B Streets to vehicular traffic, reconnecting the Civic Center with the neighborhood, and also making the Complex more accessible and welcoming for retail uses. Plazas, fountains, landscaped pedestrian promenades, and pocket courtyards are the backdrop to this active center for civic and everyday life. From its solar photovoltaic panels and garden rooftops to wind turbines and a central cooling and heating plant, the proposed new City Hall complex, along with mixed-use buildings and shared below-grade parking, will reflect the community’s vision. The team expects the project to exceed LEED-Platinum certification.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

SOLAR THERMAL Solar thermal panels would capture the sun’s energy, heating water for use within the building.

SOLAR ELECTRICITY AND SHADING A photovoltaic system would contribute to the building’s power grid, and window shades would help keep the building naturally cool.

About 75% of total hot water demand would be offset by solar thermal panels

About 9% of total energy use would be offset by solar electricity panels

EFFICIENT LIGHTING The building would be designed to maximize the abundance of natural light available. Other measures would include the use of high-efficiency fluorescent lights and “smart” lighting controls that would turn off lights in areas where they are not needed.

WIND HARVESTING Wind blowing in from the ocean would turn small wind turbines, generating supplemental electricity for the building.

=

Solar panels would generate an estimated 795,000 kWh per year, or enough to power about 72 homes annually.

WIND TURNS TURBINES

GREEN ROOFS Green roofs, which have an insulating effect, would reduce heating and cooling costs and help remove contaminants from stormwater runoff. Plants would be drought-tolerant.

COLD FROM BEAMS OF CHILLED WATER

HYDRONIC COOLING A chilled water system would be used for cooling. More efficient than a forced-air cooling system, the chiller in the basement would pump the cold water through the building in special pipes.

RECYCLED WATER An on-site wastewater treatment plant would treat water from toilets, sinks, and irrigation runoff for reuse as gray water.

CROSS SECTION

THERMAL STORAGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

CHILLER PLANT

BASEMENT

MATERIALS Local materials will be used as much as possible to limit emissions from material transportation and to stimulate the local economy.

CLIF BAR & COMPANY CLIF BAR HEADQUARTERS

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 139.9 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 56 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 98.6 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Modeled Energy Use: 40.2 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: CI 2009 Rating: Platinum

Emeryville, California

THE 75,000 SF CLIF BAR HEADQUARTERS, DESIGNED BY ZGF, TRANSFORMS AN ORIGINAL WORLD WAR II VALVE MANUFACTURING FACILITY INTO A WORKPLACE HAVEN FOR THE OUTDOOR ENTHUSIASTS AT CLIF BAR & COMPANY, A LEADING MAKER OF ORGANIC SPORTS NUTRITION FOODS AND HEALTHY SNACKS.

The space celebrates the inherent natural light and volumetric space of a repurposed warehouse, while capturing the company culture and connecting employees to the outdoors through “biophilic” interior design. From custom door pulls made from repurposed bike frames to the largest “smart” solar array in North America—which provides most of the office’s electricity needs—the adaptive reuse focuses on Clif Bar’s core values to sustain its brands, its business,

its people, its community, and the planet. The project is LEED-Platinum certified for Commercial Interiors.

The headquarters features an open office working environment, a research and development kitchen, an employee wellness area, onsite childcare, theater space, and a café.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

REDUCE WATER Low-flow fixtures help reduce water use by more than 30%.

REDUCE LIGHT ENERGY Daylight sensors switch off electric lights when there is ample daylight, reducing lighting energy use.

NATURAL MATERIALS Interior planters and natural, non-toxic materials were selected in colors that reflect the natural environment and connect the occupants to the exterior.

NATURAL LIGHT AND AIR Interior courtyards allow access to natural light and air; wireless network system allows the occupants to be outside and still work.

DAYLIGHT Daylight from existing clerestory windows was harnessed by designing large, open office areas to achieve interior light during most of the day.

CONTROL WINDOW Glare control window coverings were installed to provide a comfortable working environment. Over 85% of occupied areas are naturally daylit.

REUSE FURNITURE Furniture reuse over 60% of the furniture, kitchen equipment and theater equipment was reused, including workstations from a former tenant and kitchen equipment from a defunct restaurant.

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

300

COOKING

(44.1%) by End Use | Clif Bar Energy Breakdown HEATING (26%)

200 139.9

100

REFRIGERATION (3.9%)

VERTICAL TRANSPORT (0.1%)

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

LIGHTING

VENT FANS

(1.7%)

(4.6%)

(9.7%) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

56 COOLING

KEY 2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

(1.3%)

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

(8.5%)

OPERABLE WINDOWS Operable windows were refurbished to provide occupants fresh air, cooling, and connection to the outdoors.

AIR TEMPERATURES Exposed concrete floors moderate indoor air temperatures; mass absorbs excess heat throughout the day.

RECLAIMED WOOD Reclaimed wood was used throughout the project for stair treads, ceilings, floors, wall finishes, benches, table tops, and wall caps.

CONSERVE ENERGY Individual occupancy sensory at each workstation turns off unused powered devices, helping to conserve energy and reduce building heat loads.

RECYCLE Recycled sporting equipment that would have otherwise been tossed in a landfill was used to make door pulls and art installations.

THERMAL PANELS Solar thermal panels heat 70% of hot water used by Clif Bar, offsetting natural gas use and saving 27,000 pounds of co2 emissions per year. High-efficiency boilers provide back-up for nights and low sun days.

WATER FILTER Stormwater run-off planter captures and filters water from the exterior play area preventing that runoff from entering the sewer system.

MINIMIZE ELECTRICITY Occupancy sensors and time clocks control the lighting throughout the space, minimizing electrical lighting use. Task lighting serves individual workstations.

GREEN ROOF Photovoltaic panels on the roof will generate over 700,000 kwh / yr and provide up to 75% of power for the tenant space.

CONRAD N. HILTON FOUNDATION NEW OFFICE CAMPUS

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 79 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 31.6 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 37.5 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Modeled Energy Use: 20 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Platinum

Agoura Hills, California

ZGF MASTER PLANNED AND DESIGNED THE NEW HEADQUARTERS FOR THIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION. THE 69-ACRE CAMPUS, LOCATED IN THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS, HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO RESPECT ITS NATURAL SETTING AND TO ADAPT TO THE REGION’S ENVIRONMENT.

The development of this contemporary office campus will provide the Foundation with a central headquarters to operate, maintain, and coordinate its long-term charitable projects. The full build-out of 90,300 SF of office space and support facilities will be implemented over four phases, along with site improvements.

Phase I is a 22,240 SF office building featuring a reception area, meeting rooms, and a convenience kitchen with casual seating. To reflect the Foundation’s primary objectives of providing innovative solutions

to maximize energy efficiency and environmental protection, the building has been designed to achieve LEED-Platinum certification, and to set a regional precedent for environmental stewardship. Sustainable design features include a green roof, solar energy panels, passive heating and ventilation systems, and a stormwater collection system.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy Ͳ Double Skin & Baseline Building (reduced loads) Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed (reduced loads) Buoyancy + Buoyancy + (reduced loads) (reduced loads) Double Skin & Double Skin & Double Skin & Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Baseline Building Baseline Building Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Baseline Building Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy Ͳ INTEGRATED SYSTEMS OVERVIEW (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds.

Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Cooling & Heating Microturbine (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²)Fixed Thermal Storage Chilled Beams Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Chilled Beams Horiz. FinsFixed Thermal Storage Auto. Shds.

Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Chilled Beams Microturbine Horiz. Fins Microturbine (reduced loads) Double Skin & Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + (reduced loads) (reduced loads) Double Skin & (reduced loads) Double Skin & Double Skin & Baseline Building Baseline Building Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Cooling & Heating Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Cooling & Heating Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Thermal Storage Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Cooling & Heating Buoyancy + Solar Microturbine Buoyancy + (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds.

Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Cooling & Heating Microturbine (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Chilled Beams Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Auto. Shds.

Horiz. Fins Cooling & Heating Thermal Storage Chilled Beams Cooling & Heating Microturbine Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Microturbine Cooling & Heating Microturbin Baseline Building

Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Baseline Building

Buoyancy Ͳ

Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ

Buoyancy Ͳ

ystem l

alystem ANT al tal tst0.0 % 0.0 % st 10.0 %

10.0 % 20.0 %

20.0 % 30.0 %

30.0 % 40.0 %

40.0 % 50.0 %

50.0 % 60.0 %

60.0 % 70.0 % 70.0 %

13% 14% 13%

10.0 %

13%% 13% 14%20.0

20.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 40.0 % 40.0 % 50.0 % 50.0 % 60.0 %

2 kWh/ft 2 kWh/ft

13% 15% 10.0 % 11% 20.0 13%% 15%

20.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 40.0 % 40.0 % 50.0 %

13% 14% 13%

13% 14% 13%

33% 33%37%

35%

37%

35%

Percentage Reduction Percentage Reduction From Code Compliant From Code Compliant

NS ions STEM ions stem stem NS ANT

Percentage Reduction Percentage Reduction From Code Compliant From Code Compliant

h/ft²0.0 ons TEM 0.0 Wh/ft² ons

4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft²2.0 2.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft² 2.0 kWh/ft² 0.0 kWh/ft²0.0 0.0 kWh/ft²0.0 0.0 kWh/ft²0.0 Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code 0.0 Option Option Option Option Option Façade Options Façade Options Options Option 12 Option Option Option 1 21 VAVMECHANICAL VAV XXX Buoyancy Chilled Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy VAV VAV VAVMECHANICAL VAV XXX Buoyancy VAV XXX 1 Chilled Buoyancy VAVBeam Chilled Buoyancy XXX Beam SYSTEM MECHANICAL SYSTEM 0.0 Compliant SYSTEM 0.0 kWh/ft² 0.0 kWh/ft² 0.0 kWh/ft² Option 11 Façade Option 11 0.0 Compliant Option 2 Option 11 Option Façade Options Façade Options Façade Options Option Option 11 Option 1 21 Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Compliant Code Compliant XXX Auto Shades Auto Shades Options 2, 3, 4 Auto Shades Code Compliant Code Compliant Code Compliant XXX Code Auto Compliant XXX Shades Code Auto Compliant Shades Options Auto XXX Shades 2, 3,1 FACADE OPTIONS FACADE OPTIONS FACADE OPTIONS Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 1 Option Façade Options Façade Options Façade Options Option 1 Option 1 Option Option 1 214 VAVMECHANICAL VAV XXX Buoyancy Chilled Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy VAV VAV VAV VAV XXX Buoyancy VAV XXX Chilled Buoyancy VAV Beam Chilled Buoyancy XXX Beam SYSTEM MECHANICAL SYSTEM MECHANICAL SYSTEM Option Option 1 Option 2 Option Option Façade Options Façade Options Façade Options Option Option 11 Option 21 Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant VAV Mechanical VAV Buoyancy Buoyancy Chilled Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy System Mechanical VAV System VAV 1 Mechanical Buoyancy VAV System Buoyancy VAV 1 Chilled Buoyancy VAVBeam Chilled Buoyancy Buoyancy Beam Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant VAV VAV Buoyancy Buoyancy Chilled Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Mechanical System Mechanical VAV System VAV Mechanical Buoyancy VAV System Buoyancy VAV Chilled Buoyancy VAV Beam Solar Chilled Buoyancy Buoyancy Beam Thermal Thermal Thermal Cooling Thermal Code Compliant Code Compliant XXX Auto Shades Auto Shades Options 2, 3, 4 Auto Shades Code Compliant Code Compliant Code Compliant XXX Code Auto Compliant XXX Shades Code Auto Compliant Shades Options Auto XXX Shades 2, 3,+4 FACADE OPTIONS FACADE OPTIONS FACADE OPTIONS Conventional Conventional XXX Conventional Conventional XXX Conventional XXX Conventional XXX PLANT MECHANICAL PLANT PLANT Storage VAVMECHANICAL VAV Buoyancy Buoyancy Chilled Beam Conventional Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Mechanical System Mechanical VAV System VAVMECHANICAL Mechanical Buoyancy VAV System Buoyancy VAV Chilled Buoyancy VAVBeam Chilled Buoyancy Buoyancy Storage Storage Heating Storage Code Code Code Code Mechanical Mechanical Code Code Mechanical Code Code Code Code Code Code CodeBeam Concept 1A Concept Concept 1 Concept VAV Mechanical VAV Buoyancy Buoyancy Chilled Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Concept 1A Concept Concept 1A 12 + System Mechanical VAV System VAV Mechanical Buoyancy VAV System Buoyancy VAV 1 Chilled Buoyancy VAVBeam Chilled Buoyancy Buoyancy Beam Thermal Thermal Thermal Solar Cooling Thermal Code Code Code Code Mechanical Mechanical Code Code Mechanical Code Code Code Code Code Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Plant Plant Compliant Compliant Plant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Conventional Conventional XXX Conventional Conventional XXX Conventional Conventional XXX Conventional XXX PLANT MECHANICAL PLANT MECHANICAL PLANT Storage COST COST COST Storage Storage Heating Storage CodeMECHANICAL Code Code Code Mechanical Mechanical Code Code Mechanical Code Code Code Code 1 Code Code1A Code1A Concept 1A Concept Concept 11 Concept Concept Concept 1212 Concept Concept Concept Concept Concept Concept Concept Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Plant Plant Compliant Compliant Plant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Initial Cost Initial Cost Initial Cost Code Code Code Code Mechanical Mechanical Code Code Mechanical Code 1A Code Code 1 Code 1A Code 1A Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Plant Plant Compliant Compliant Plant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant COST COST COST Concept0.01A% Concept 1 Concept1A 1 Concept Concept Concept1A 12 0% 0% 0% 0% Initial Cost Cost Initial Cost Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Plant Plant Compliant Compliant Plant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Initial Cost0.0 % Initial Initial Cost0.0 % Initial Cost 0.0 % Initial Cost 0.0 % 0% 0% 0% 0.0 % 0% Initial Cost Initial Cost 10.0 % 10.0 % 10.0 % 11% 11% 11% 11%

Percentage Reduction Reduction Percentage From Code Compliant From Code Compliant

Wh/ft² h/ft²2.0 h/ft² Wh/ft²2.0 Wh/ft²

2 kWh/ft 2 kWh/ft

2 kWh/ft 2 kWh/ft

Double Skin & (reduced loads) Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed (reduced loads) Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + (reduced loads) Double Skin & Double Skin & Double Skin & Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Fixed Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + h/ft² Baseline Building (reduced loads) 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building Heating Heating Heating Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Baseline Building Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy Ͳ (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds.

Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Cooling & Heating Microturbine (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Chilled Beams Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Auto. Shds.

Horiz. Fins Cooling & Heating Thermal Storage Chilled Beams Cooling & Heating Microturbine Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Microturbine Cooling & Heating Microturbin Double Skin & (reduced loads) Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed (reduced loads) Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + (reduced loads) Double Skin & Double Skin & Double Skin & Buoyancy Ͳ Fixed Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Fixed Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Buoyancy Ͳ Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy + Fixed (kWh/ft²) Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Buoyancy + Solar Buoyancy Wh/ft² Baseline Building (reduced loads) 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building 14.0 kWh/ft² Baseline Building (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Heating Heating Heating 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds.

Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Cooling & Heating Microturbine (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Chilled Beams Auto. Shds. (kWh/ft²) Traditional Façade Chilled Beams Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Auto. Shds.

Horiz. Fins Cooling & Heating Thermal Storage Chilled Beams Cooling & Heating Microturbine Horiz. Fins Thermal Storage Microturbine Cooling & Heating Microturbi (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Cooling Cooling Cooling h/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.4 12.4 12.0 12.4 12.4 h/ft² Waste Heat 14.0 kWh/ft² 14.0 kWh/ft² 14.0 kWh/ft² Waste Heat Waste Heat Heating Heating Heating 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Cooling Cooling Cooling Wh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Wh/ft² Waste Heat 14.0 kWh/ft² 14.0 kWh/ft² Waste Heat Waste Heat *10.7 12.0 14.0 kWh/ft² *10.7 *10.7 *10.7 Heating Heating Heating Heating Heating Heating 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 Cooling Cooling Cooling h/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 * * * * h/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² Heating Heating Heating (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Cooling Cooling Cooling Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Cooling Cooling Cooling Wh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 12.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Waste Waste Waste Waste Wh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Cooling Cooling Cooling Heat Heat Heat Heat h/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Waste Waste Waste Waste 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 Fans Fans Fans h/ft²8.0 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Fans (kWh/ft²) Waste Waste Waste Waste Heat Heat Heat Heat Wh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² 10.0 kWh/ft² Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 Fans Fans Fans Heat Heat Heat Heat 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Wh/ft²8.0 Pumps (kWh/ft²) 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 8.0 kWh/ft²8.0 Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps Pumps Pumps Waste Waste Waste Waste h/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Heat Heat Heat Heat 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps (kWh/ft²) Pumps Pumps Pumps 6.0 6.0 6.0 h/ft²6.0 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² Wh/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² 8.0 kWh/ft² Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Wh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft²6.0 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft²6.0 6.0 kWh/ft²6.0 h/ft² 6.0 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² Lifts Lifts Lifts Computers Computers Computers Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Lifts (kWh/ft²) Computers Computers Computers 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Wh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² 6.0 kWh/ft² (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Computers Computers Computers Computers Computers Computers h/ft²4.0 4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² Computers Computers Computers (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting Exterior Lighting Exterior Lighting h/ft² 4.0 4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft² (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Computers Computers Computers Wh/ft² 4.0 kWh/ft²4.0 4.0 kWh/ft²4.0 4.0 kWh/ft²4.0 Exterior Lighting Exterior Lighting Exterior Lighting

13% 14% 13% 15% 10.0 % 11% 13%% 13% 14%20.0 15%

39%

20.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 40.0 %

42% 41% 40.0 % 39% 41% 42%50.0 %

13% 15% 11% 13% 15%

33%

35% 33%37% 40% 35% 42% 44% 40% 37% 42% 44%

13% 14% 13%

13% 14% 13%

Option Option Option1 1 2 1 Buoyancy Buoyancy Option Option 2 11

Auto Shades Options Auto Shades 2, 3,1 Option Option Option 1 2 14 Buoyancy Buoyancy Option Option 2 11 Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Thermal Auto Shades Options Auto Shades 2, 3, 4 Microturbine Conventional Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Storage Code Concept Buoyancy Concept 1 Buoyancy Thermal Code 3 Microturbine Compliant Conventional Storage Code3 Concept Concept 11 Concept Concept Compliant Code 3 Compliant

Concept Concept 31 Compliant

32% 33% 39% 40%

42% 41% 42% 44% 39% 40% 42% 41% 42% 52% 44% 54% 56% 52%

(kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting

Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Lighting Lighting Exterior Lighting Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Lighting Lighting Lighting Lighting

(kWh/ft²) Reduced Loads Lighting *(kWh/ft²) additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) Reduced Loads Lighting reduction with *Lighting additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²)

high performance reduction Option Option 11 with Buoyancy Option Option12 21 Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Option Option 11 Option Option 11 facade high performance Auto Shades Options Auto Shades 2, 3,12 Option Option 11 Option Option 214 Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Option Option 11 Option Option 11 facade Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Solar Cooling + Thermal Solar Cooling Thermal Auto Shades Options Auto Shades 2, 3,+4 Microturbine Storage Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Heating Heating Storage Concept Concept 1A 1 2+ Concept Concept 3 12 + Chilled Buoyancy Beam Buoyancy Buoyancy Solar Cooling Thermal Solar Cooling Thermal Microturbine Storage1A Heating Heating Storage31 Concept Concept 1 2 12 Concept Concept 212 Concept Concept1A Concept Concept 3

Concept Concept1A 1 2

Concept Concept 312

Note: Waste Heat Not Note: Waste Note: Waste Included Heat Not Heat Not Note: Waste Included

13% 15% 11% 13% 15%

33%

35% 33%37% 39% 35% 42% 41% 45% 39% 37%47% 42% 41% 48% 45% 47% 48%

(kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting

Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Lighting Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Exterior Lighting (kWh/ft²) Lighting Lighting

35% 37% 32% 33%37% 40% 35% 42% 44% 37% 45% 40% 37%47% 48% 42% 45% 44% 47% 48%

Included Heat Not Included

(kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Reduced Loads -*Lighting Reduced Loads Lighting *(kWh/ft²) additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) Lighting Reduced Loads Reduced Loads Lighting reduction with -*Lighting reduction with *Lighting additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) additional 3-5% (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²) (kWh/ft²)

high performance high performance reduction reduction Option Option Option Option11 Buoyancy Buoyancy Option Option 1111 with Buoyancy Option 11 with Buoyancy Option facade facade high performance high performance Auto Auto Shades Shades Auto Shades11 Auto Shades Option Option Option Option Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Option Option 1111 Option Option 1 facade facade Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Thermal Solar Cooling Auto Auto Shades Shades Auto Shades+ Auto Shade Microturbine Microturbin Storage Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyanc Heating Concept Concept 3 1 Concept 2+ Concept Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyancy Buoyanc Thermal Solar Cooling Microturbine Microturbin Storage31 Heating 2 Concept Concept Concept Concept 3 Concept Concept 3 1 Concept 2 Concept

Concept Concept 31

Note: Waste Heat Not Note: Waste Note: Waste Included Heat Not Heat Not Note: Waste Included

32%

37% 32% Raw Energy 39% 40% 41% 42%heat (waste not included) 44% 42% 37% 45% Raw Energy 39% 40% 47% 41% 42% (waste heat not included) 44% 42% Raw Energy 48% 52% 52% 45% 47% 54% 54% Raw Energy 56% 56% 48% 52% 52%

Included Heat Not Included

Concept 2

Included Heat Not Included

32% 37% 32% 32% Raw Energy Raw Energy (waste heat not included) (waste heat not included) 37% 45%Raw Energy Raw Energy 47% (waste heat not included) (waste heat not included) Raw Energy Raw Energy 48% 52% 45% 47% 54% Raw Energy Raw 56% Energy 48% 52%

32%

50.0 % 50.0 % Energy Cost Energy Cost Energy Cost 60.0 % 60.0 % 54% 54% 54% 54% 56% 56% 56% 56% Energy Cost Energy Cost Energy Cost 60.0 % 60.0 % 60.0 % Carbon Carbon Carbon 70.0 % 70.0 % 70.0 % 71% Energy Cost (% reduction by option) 71% 71% Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon Carbon Carbon 70.0 % 70.0 % 70.0 % 71% Energy Cost (% reduction by option) 71% 71% Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option)

Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Raw Energy (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Energy Cost (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) Carbon (% reduction by option) ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Approach NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS The local

sets a regional and global precedent for sustainable building design.

INTEGRATED BUILDING SYSTEMS Simplified systems integral and reliant on each other create unique efficiencies.

PASSIVE DOWNDRAFT VENTILATION Innovative chimney system provides 100% outside air contributing to reduced energy loads and quality indoor air. The ventilation system is coordinated with the envelope system to balance heat gain.

HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING ENVELOPE The building orientation, ventilation, and envelope design will work together to balance heat gain.

Concept

Note: Waste Heat Not Note: Waste Note: Waste Included Heat Not Heat Not Note: Waste Included

micro-climate and views are honored by a thin floor plate, orientation, filtered direct sunlight in public spaces, and strategic glass placement with an exterior shading system.

BUILDING MONITORING SYSTEM Data on the various uses of the building will be displayed on flat screen monitors.

WATER-USE REDUCTION High-efficiency plumbing fixtures conserve water, and stormwater is used for non-potable applications.

MATERIAL RESOURCES Use of local, renewable, and recycled building materials. Recycled content will be found in all parts of the structural system and construction of the interior partitions.

37%

37%

71% 71%

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY (5.4%) HEAT REJECT Energy Breakdown

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

(5.6%)

VENT FANS (3.9%)

by End Use | Hilton

(25.4%)

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

300

(1.5%) HEATING (11.2%)

200

KEY

100 79 LIGHTING (17.8%)

COOLING (29.2%)

GREEN ROOFS Intensive and extensive roof gardens mitigate the building temperature, create new wildlife habitat, and integrate the building mass into the landscape.

DISCIPLINED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES Minimizing noise, dust, and runoff pollution during construction while implementing an extensive plan for construction waste management.

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING A palette of local plant species minimizes the need for maintenance, irrigation, mowing, and contributes to protected plant life preservation creating a natural habitat for local wildlife.

SITE WATER An enhanced strategy that combines various water sources including reclaimed storm, roof, and potable into a storage tank for varied future use.

31.6

0

2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline 2030c Target based on occupancy date

SITE LIGHTING Efficient design of site lighting will reduce night sky light pollution and limit light spill over to adjacent sites.

ON-SITE RENEWABLE ENERGY: SOLAR Innovative roof mounted thermal solar system in combination with photovoltaic canopies that provide shade in the parking lot, reducing reliance on the electrical grid.

OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Contributes to the local community by using the major road development required to expand and enliven the public debris basin.

ACTIVE SHADING SYSTEM SHADES OPEN A key factor in the passive downdraft HVAC system is the need to control direct sun from the conditioned space whenever the outside air temperatures are above 80°F.

SHADES CLOSED The automated external shading system is designed to limit the direct sun on the southwest façade of the building during hot afternoons, but enable occupants to outdoor views and abundant natural light.

SHADES

ENERGY EFFICIENCY WATER COOLED CHILLER The HVAC system provides chilled water using a water-cooled chiller, combined with a cooling tower and pumps. The highly efficient chiller, combined with the elevated supply temperatures used by the natural ventilation system, and the automated operable shading devices with highperformance glazing, potentially will allow the building to have 61% HVAC energy savings when compared to ASHRAE.

PRECOOLING COIL & COOLING COIL SOLAR HOT WATER

STORAGE TANK

SOLAR THERMAL HEATING Energy for the heating load and hot water comes from the sun, with the back-up water heating system using a solar thermal system. A solar thermal array consists of 1,000 SF of evacuated tubes and a 3,000 gallon storage tank provides almost 70% of the hot water heating and all of the domestic hot water.

BACKUP WATER HEATER WATERSIDE ECONOMIZER LOOP

COOLING TOWER ON SITE

WATER COOLED CHILLERS

DICKINSON COLLEGE STUART HALL AND JAMES HALL

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 390.6 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 195.3 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 279 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Modeled Energy Use: 216 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 3 LEED Version: NC 2.1 Rating: Gold

Carlisle, Pennsylvania

ZGF DESIGNED A NEW 90,000 SF SCIENCE FACILITY, WHICH SERVES AS A UNIFIED HOME FOR FIVE PREVIOUSLY DISPERSED ACADEMIC PROGRAMS, AND ENHANCES DICKINSON COLLEGE’S TRADITION OF INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY AND COLLABORATION,

The building includes interactive learning and research spaces for biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, chemistry, neuroscience, and psychology. The design balances a contemporary look with elements that are responsive to existing campus construction. Sloped roofs and limestone reflect the existing character of the campus, while the use of iridescent stainless-steel shingles and the glass curtain wall treatment convey a fresh, modern design approach. Multiple courtyards have been integrated to facilitate indoor and outdoor

teaching and interaction. Texture, color, and the playful use of materials at the exterior extend inside the building to humanize and add richness to the interiors. The facility is Dickinson’s first laboratory-intensive teaching building designed with LEED in mind, and it has achieved a LEED-Gold rating. The College has been historically one of the lowest energy users per square foot in the country and currently purchases 50% of its campus electricity needs from wind-generated power. Enthalpy heat wheel recovery mechanical systems and extensive commissioning guarantees the building systems and energy use performs as intended. A 30% reduction in water use is achieved through efficient fixtures and significant energy savings are generated from the highefficiency windows, exterior sun shading, interior light harvesting, occupancy sensors, and interior sunshades.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

400

390.6 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (3.6%)

LIGHTING

300

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

VENT FANS Energy Breakdown by End Use | Dickinson (3.7%)

(7.3%)

(15.5%)

DOMESTIC HOT WATER (0.2%)

200

195.3

KEY

100

2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy

HEATING COOLING (35.5%)

WATER-USE REDUCTION A 30-percent reduction in water use is achieved through high-efficiency fixtures.

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING The previously developed site has been restored with native, natural plantings that require no mechanical irrigation.

NATURAL DAYLIGHT AND VIEWS In addition to the building massing and orientation, glazing and sunscreen strategies allow for comfortable and well daylit indoor teaching environments. Nearly all of the spaces in the new halls offer direct outdoor views and more than half of the open space is punctuated by natural light.

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT An extensive construction waste management plan was implemented during construction to minimize noise, dust, and runoff pollution. This resulted in 75% of all construction debris being diverted from landfills through recycling.

LEED / Code baseline

(34.4%)

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

RECYCLED CONTENT The materials used in the building’s interior spaces are produced from recycled content.

STORMWATER DESIGN Site stormwater is mitigated by a retention pond / bioswale to reduce the load on the municipal stormwater system and provide cleaner stormwater.

ON-SITE ENERGY Significant energy savings are generated from high-efficiency windows, exterior sun shading, interior light harvesting, occupancy sensors, and interior sunshades.

BUILDING MONITORING SYSTEM An energy monitor is displayed in the building’s lobby to encourage conservation by demonstrating the building’s energy load.

DUKE UNIVERSITY NICHOLAS SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 140 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 56 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 100 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Modeled Energy Use: 80 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2009 Rating: Platinum (intent to register)

Durham, North Carolina

ZGF IS DESIGNING A FUTURE 250,000 SF FACILITY FOR THE DUKE UNIVERSITY, NICHOLAS SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

The facility will house wet and dry laboratories, teaching laboratories, administrative offices, computing laboratories, and offices for the Nicholas Institute, all organized in three stories around a central courtyard and atrium. About one-half of the program (125,000 SF) will feature the adaptive reuse of the structural frame of the existing, outdated Gross Chemistry building. In consideration of the project’s aggressive sustainable design strategies, site development is of minimal impact, taking advantage of a previously developed site. Other considerations include optimal building siting with regards to topography, existing vegetation patterns, and solar access. The project will seek a LEED-Platinum

rating. Proposed sustainable design strategies include the use of photovoltaics, underfloor air distribution, enthalpic heat wheel recovery, chilled beam M/E/P systems, daylight harvesting and solar control, double-skin façades, vegetated roofing, and a district-wide stormwater management plan.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

HUMAN HEALTH Occupant comfort and satisfaction will be increased over existing school spaces through improvements in thermal comfort and temperature controllability, lighting, daylight and views, acoustic comfort, and air quality. These factors will be measured through pre- and post-occupancy evaluations. Extra care in material selection will reduce the number of toxic and hazardous compounds present, benefitting occupant health.

ENERGY USE Overall energy consumption will be dramatically reduced through daylight harvesting strategies, high-performance envelope materials and aggressive shading techniques that decrease solar gain, physically isolating laboratories from office spaces to allow for efficient targeting of mechanical systems, de-coupling heating and cooling from ventilation, and onsite renewable energy generation.

MATERIALS IMPACT Stringent construction waste management plans and clever reuse of materials onsite will help divert large amounts of demolition and construction waste from landfills. Materials like 100% recycled content brick and wood harvested from the sustainably managed Duke Forest will reduce the building’s environmental footprint.

LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGY Planted filtration runnels and basins will cleanse stormwater of contaminants before it reaches local streams and watersheds. Green roofs and light-colored paving and roofing materials will lower the building’s overall temperature, reducing its impact on the local ecology and microclimate.

BUILDING OPERATIONS Building operations will facilitate current University sustainable initiatives and will support innovation and development of new practices.

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

MISCELLANEOUSEnergy EQUIPMENT

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

VENT FANS

Breakdown by End Use | Duke(8%) Nicholas (1%)

300

DOMESTIC HOT WATER (1%)

(23%)

200 140 KEY HEATING (7%)

LIGHTING (13%)

100

2030c Baseline Energy model

56

Actual energy LEED / Code baseline 2030c Target based on occupancy date

0 COOLING (47%)

Stormwater Polishing Basin

WATER USE Stormwater and graywater reuse for non-potable purposes, combined with low-flow plumbing fixtures and minimal irrigation, will help reduce demand on local water supplies. Planted “tidal basins” of the Living Machine will cleanse building effluent into reusable graywater, reducing demands on the local water and sewer systems.

TRANSPARENCY AND DIDACTICISM The green roofs, photovoltaic arrays, and Living Machine will provide prime opportunities for faculty and student research projects in ecology, energy, and stormwater.

Building and site systems monitoring will provide real-time feedback and displays on the building’s environmental performance.

Air Conditioning Condensate

Roof Run-Off

water cycle

Stormwater Cistern

Sub-Surface Irrigation

Toilet Flushing and Graywater Use Living Machine

GERDING EDLEN DEVELOPMENT TWELVE | WEST MIXED-USE BUILDING

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 95.8 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 47.9 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 69.9 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Modeled Energy Use: 36 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: 43.7 (2010) Climate Zone: 3 LEED Version: NC 2.1 and 2.2 interior hybrid • Rating: Platinum

Portland, Oregon

ZGF DESIGNED A NEW 22-STORY, 550,000 SF MIXED-USE BUILDING IN PORTLAND’S EMERGING WEST END DISTRICT TO MEET TWO LEED-PLATINUM CERTIFICATIONS AND SERVE AS A LABORATORY FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND WORKPLACE STRATEGIES.

Twelve | West features street-level retail space, four floors of office space, 17 floors of apartments, and five levels of below-grade parking. The building has an eco-roof, rooftop garden and terrace space, complete fitness studio, and a theatre. Four wind turbines sit prominently atop the building representing the first U.S. installation of a wind turbine array on an urban highrise. The building serves as not only an anchor in a rapidly transforming urban neighborhood, but also as a demonstration project to inform future sustainable

building design. Twelve | West was honored as a 2010 AIA COTE Top Ten Green Project.

Home to the Portland office of ZGF, the building serves as both a reflection of our culture and as a living laboratory where we can evaluate first-hand how the workplace environment functions and feels. The office floors have an open-floor concept with some interior offices that have transparent walls to ensure that natural light penetrates into the building. Each office floor features alternating interior communicating stairs, with lounge areas and seating to help foster employee interaction.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

Simple tools—a fishing rod, a toy glider propeller, and a wooden ruler—when coupled with world-class expertise, yielded key information in the overall exercise of successfully implementing building-integrated wind turbines.

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

EXTERIOR USAGE

(32.5%)

(1.1%)

300

HEATING

VENT FANS

(15.8%)

(8.7%)

200

KEY

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

100 95.8

(0.6%) COOLING

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (7.8%)

47.9

(15.9%) LIGHTING (17.7%)

2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

WIND TURBINES Four Wind Turbines produce 10–12,000 kWh of electricity per year. Monitoring of wind conditions and turbine performance will improve knowledge for future projects.

SOLAR THERMAL PANELS Solar Thermal panels heat 24% of hot water used in the building, offsetting natural gas use.

GREEN ROOF Roof Gardens clean, detain and filter rainwater and significantly reduce roof temperatures in warmer months.

SUNLIGHT Low-e Glass admits 55% of visible sunlight but reflects 70% of the associated heat, reducing energy use for lighting and space cooling.

COOLING Efficient Central Cooling plant in the nearby Brewery Blocks provides chilled water for space cooling.

REDUCE WATER Water-efficient Plumbing Fixtures help reduce water use by more than 44%.

HARVESTING Rain Water Harvesting piping gathers 273,000 gallons of rainwater from the roofs.

COLLECT WATER Condensation of 13,000 gallons of water from the air handler system will collect during summer months.

RE-USE Rainwater Re-use in toilet flushing on the office floors, and to irrigate the green roofs, reduces use of city water by 286,000 gallons per year.

OPERABLE WINDOWS Operable Windows provide occupants fresh air, cooling, and a connection to the outdoors.

REDUCE LIGHTING Daylight Sensors switch off electric lights when there is ample daylight, reducing lighting energy use by 60%.

RE-USE RAINWATER Water Storage Tank temporarily stores up to 22,000 gallons of rain-water and condensation for re-use.

AIR TEMPERATURE Exposed Concrete moderates indoor air temperatures. Mass is cooled with cool night air in the summer months and absorbs excess heat throughout the day.

CHILLED BEAMS Passive / Chilled Beams provide energy-efficient cooling on the hottest days.

UNDER FLOOR Under-Floor Air Distribution efficiently delivers moderatetemperature air directly to occupants.

Personal adjustable floor vents provide control over ventilation.

J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE LA JOLLA

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 229.6 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 91.8 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 164 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Modeled Energy Use: 50.2 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Platinum (targeted)

La Jolla, California

ZGF DESIGNED THIS 44,607 SF BUILDING COMPRISED OF LABORATORY, TECHNICAL, AND OFFICE / ADMINISTRATIVE SPACES, WITH A 112-SPACE PARTIALLY BELOW-GRADE PARKING STRUCTURE IN RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGE TO GENERATE MORE ENERGY THAN IT CONSUMES AND TO PRODUCE ZERO WASTE.

J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) is a non-profit research institute dedicated to the advancement of the science of genomics; the understanding of its implications for society; and the communication of those results to the scientific community, the public, and policymakers.

The holistic approach to this new facility has revolved around energy performance, water conservation, and a multitude of other efforts that will make JCVI a good neighbor to the University of California, San Diego,

the surrounding residential community, and beyond.

The design team has been benchmarking the project with two building design guidelines—the USGBC Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design and EPA’s Laboratories for the 21st Century programs.

Based on this benchmarking and additional sustainable features, JCVI will be one of the “greenest” buildings in the United States with a LEED-Platinum rating and net-zero energy footprint.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

DOMESTIC HOT WATER Energy

VENT FANS

(1%)

EXTERIOR USAGE (6%)

Breakdown by End REFRIGERATION Use | Venter

HEATING (7%)

300

(13%)

(11%)

COOLING (5%)

229.6

200 PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

KEY

(2%) LIGHTING (13%)

100

91.8

2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (42%)

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL (FSC) CERTIFIED WOOD All concrete formwork and interior wood finishes use wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. This ensures the sustainable logging of trees and the use of plantation grown wood.

NATURAL VENTILATION / PASSIVE COOLING Operable windows improve the occupant comfort, and chilled beams cool and heat office spaces efficiently without unnecessary fan power.

RECYCLED CONTENT The materials used in the building’s interior spaces are produced from recycled content. Fly ash is used in the concrete.

USE OF REGIONAL MATERIALS The stone used is from local quarries, and the concrete contains local aggregates.

ON-SITE RENEWABLE ENERGY: SOLAR The entire electrical load is generated on-site from roof-mounted photovoltaic panels.

GREEN ROOFS Roof gardens mitigate the building temperature, increase the lifespan of the roof, create new wildlife habitat, and mitigate stormwater runoff volume.

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS The local micro-climate and views are honored by using filtered direct sunlight in public spaces with strategic glass placement.

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING A palette of local plant species minimizes the need for maintenance, irrigation, or mowing, and creates a natural habitat for local wildlife.

RAINWATER HARVESTING Rainwater is captured and re-used with mechanical filtering and UV disinfection.

WATER-USE REDUCTION High efficiency plumbing fixtures and waterless urinals conserve water, and stormwater for non-potable applications is re-used.

CITY OF SEATTLE KING STREET STATION HISTORIC RESTORATION AND RENOVATION

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 92.7 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 83.1 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Modeled Energy Use: 36.2 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD Climate Zone: 3 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Platinum (targeted)

ZGF PROVIDED DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE HISTORIC RESTORATION AND RENOVATION OF THE 60,000 SF KING STREET STATION, LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC PIONEER SQUARE DISTRICT OF SEATTLE, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY BUILT AND OPENED TO THE PUBLIC IN MAY 1906.

Currently in construction, elements of the project include rehabilitation of the iconic 12-story clock tower, original 45-foot-high ornamental plaster ceilings and halls, terrazzo and mosaic tile floors, and operable windows. True to the building’s original fashion, the white marble wainscoting, decorative sconces, and glass globe chandeliers that were removed during modernization of the station in the 1950’s will be replicated and replaced. The rehabilitation also includes significant seismic and structural updates to improve

Seattle, Washington

the building’s safety and durability—all which will comply with the City’s sustainable building standards and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation.

A number of sustainable strategies and systems are envisioned to increase building performance, including natural ventilation, replacement of all mechanical systems with a new ground-source heat pump, and energy and water efficient lights and fixtures. The project is registered for LEED-Platinum certification.

Lavender, Historical Glass Tiles Salvaged for Re-Use on Clocktower

TRANSPORTATION / COMMUTING CONNECTIONS Amtrak (Heavy Rail) Commuter Rail Light Rail Streetcar

Bus Bike Pedestrian Ferry

Glass Canopy to Improve Daylighting

Original Windows Preserved and Repaired New Public Open Space

Operable Windows Restored Throughout

Original Structure and Materials Restored/Maintained Performance-based Seismic Upgrade for 500 and 2500 year Events Original Clay Ceramic Roof Tiles Restored Providing Extended Roof Life of 75 Years Roof Insulation with R-30 Value

Future Canopy with Photovoltaics

Wall Insulation with R-25.6 Value Photovoltaics on Restored Canopy

Water Harvesting for Toilet Flushing

Electrical Transformers for Streetcar

Ground-source Heat Pumps for Heating and Cooling Geothermal Well Field

High-efficiency Unit Ventilators

Natural Ventilation in Main Waiting Area

LIVING CITY DESIGN COMPETITION

Portland, Oregon

AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF CITIES, DISTRICTS ARE THE RIGHT SCALE TO ACCELERATE SUSTAINABILITY— SMALL ENOUGH TO INNOVATE QUICKLY AND BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE A MEANINGFUL IMPACT. YET IN A CITY THE WHOLE IS GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS, AND NEIGHBORHOODS BALANCE ASSETS LIKE WATER AND ENERGY BETWEEN EACH OTHER TO MEET CITY-WIDE NEEDS.

Recognizing this, the Living City Design Competition asked project teams to envision a future for an existing district that meets the requirements of the rigorous Living Building Challenge rating system.

ZGF led a competition team in partnership with the Portland Sustainability Institute, and national leaders in EcoDistrict assessment and governance. The team’s

approach to the competition explores the symbiosis between five EcoDistricts in Portland and how strategies in a single East Portland district, Gateway, contribute to the city’s overall performance. The team’s entry, “Symbiotic Districts: Towards a Balanced City,” a combination of eye-catching images and innovative system strategies, garnered the People’s Choice Award.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

RENEWABLE energy production (solar and wind) integrates into the urban fabric

RESIDENTIAL buildings use excess heat captured from supermarket refrigeration systems

GEOTHERMAL conditioning loops extend across the neighborhood below ground connecting to heat pumps in buildings

ORGANIC wastes are anaerobically digested to produce energy

PEOPLE, bikes, trains and buses dance in a multi-modal system on streets where cars are prohibited

LIVING INFRASTRUCTURE Bold infrastructure interventions build towards a city living in balance. The redevelopment of a main street at the site of a regional transit station provides a rich street life based on pedestrians, bicycles and public transport. Urban greenways created from abandoned freeways and green streets provide a new green city infrastructure for habitat, food, water and waste. In a net-zero energy and water community, local fuels power nodes of district energy that couple efficient mixed-use structures, and neighborhood water utilities capture, clean and reuse water arriving from the sky. The urban greenways, roof gardens, living walls and use of the in-between green spaces allow agriculture to be embedded into the community.

Existing Conditions

RICH STREET LIFE Automobiles lose their dominance by shifting rights of way to pedestrians and bikes, allowing Gateway residents and visitors to move easily between homes, services and the regional transit center. This fuels a rich street life for pedestrians, businesses and efficient transport, creating spaces ripe for communication and connection.

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE A new green city infrastructure emerges for habitat, food, water and waste. Green streets and a new greenway over the I-205 freeway grow native habitat and food while treating and conveying water. Organic wastes are captured in the neighborhood, cleanly converted to fuels while creating industry for residents.

NET-ZERO ENERGY AND WATER Net-zero energy and water become easy targets with infrastructure that is scaled to the neighborhood. Thermal pipes bring geothermal heat to buildings, looping between them to capture efficiencies across the district. Sewer mining and organic waste provide additional firepower. Living machines throughout the district clean water, with distribution to every building through accessible networks laid under streets.

URBAN AGRICULTURE People grow food on every surface—organic fruits and vegetables are cultivated on the greenway, green spaces, rooftops, terraces and green walls. Small livestock inhabit the city alongside residents, further helping to generate one of Gateway’s most needed fuels—food—right where it is needed.

PORT OF PORTLAND HEADQUARTERS BUILDING & LONG-TERM PARKING GARAGE

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 100.5 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 40.2 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 71.7 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-2004 Modeled Energy Use: 41.8 KBTU / SF / YR (office building) 1.4 KBTU / SF / YR (parking garage) Actual Energy Use: 35.6 Climate Zone: 3 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Platinum

THE PORT OF PORTLAND’S NEW HEADQUARTERS BUILDING, DESIGNED BY ZGF, AT THE PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SHOWCASES THE CLIENT’S COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES WHILE REFLECTING A 21ST CENTURY CULTURE—ONE PORT—IN AN EFFORT TO INCREASE COLLABORATION AND FOSTER A TEAM ENVIRONMENT.

The new 205,603 SF building consists of three floors of office space atop seven floors of public airport parking. The facility is located to the east of Portland International Airport’s main terminal building and is connected to the existing parking structure, serving as a new gateway to the airport. The design reflects a reorganization of the Port along functional lines, rather than departmental, and brings together staff in the

Portland, Oregon

Marine and Aviation Divisions previously dispersed in several Portland locations. ZGF worked closely with the Port to develop new standards for office space to accommodate a shift from a closed office environment to primarily open plan—98% is open office, while 2% is private offices for those whose job functions demand privacy. With LEED-Platinum certification, the building incorporates radiant heating and cooling, daylighting, a “living machine”—an organic wastewater treatment system—and a green roof, among many other features.

The project was also named one of the world’s most high-tech green buildings by Forbes magazine, as well as honored with a Smart Environments Award by the International Interior Design Association and Metropolis magazine.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES A E

C G B

F

D

WATER EFFICIENCY

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

A 8th floor landscape deck with adaptive plants and micromist irrigation B Low-flow fixtures C Eco-roof with adaptive plants and micromist irrigation D Living Machine速 system

E Reflective membrane roof F High-performance glazing G Radiant heating and cooling ceiling H 200 ground source loops for heating and cooling with auxiliary cooling tower for peak periods

H

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

VENT FANS PUMPS AND Energy Breakdown AUXILIARY

(17.6%)

by End Use | Port of Portland

300

DOMESTIC HOT WATER HQ

(6.1%)

(0.8%)

HEATING (10.7%)

200

100.5

100

2030c Baseline Energy model

COOLING (5.8%)

40.2

LIGHTING MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

KEY

0

(15.8%)

Actual energy LEED / Code baseline 2030c Target based on occupancy date

(43.2%)

THE LIVING MACHINE速 SYSTEM

1

1 Office building: toilet, sink, and shower 2 Primary and equalization tanks 3 Tidal flow wetland 4 Polishing vertical flow wetland 5 UV sterilization disinfection 6 Clean effluent tank 7 HVAC office cooling tower

7

2

6 3 4

5

NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION / U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SOUTHWEST ECODISTRICT

Washington, DC

ZGF DEVELOPED URBAN DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES FOR THE SOUTHWEST ECODISTRICT, AN EFFORT LED BY THE NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION (NCPC) AND GSA IN COORDINATION WITH THE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DDOT), DC OFFICE OF PLANNING (DCOP), AND OTHER LOCAL AND FEDERAL AGENCIES.

The initiative aims to improve connections from the National Mall to the Southwest Waterfront and to transform the 10th Street SW and Maryland Avenue SW corridors south of the National Mall into a showcase of sustainability. The Ecodistrict will be an active, multi-modal, mixed-use neighborhood of significant cultural attractions and public spaces, offices, residences, and amenities. Three main

goals were established for the project: advancing recommendations in the Monumental Core Framework Plan; assisting the federal government to meet the goals and objectives of Executive Order 13514窶認ederal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance through the reduction greenhouse gas emissions from government facilities; and transforming this federal employment center into a model 21st century sustainable community, while enhancing the quality of life for pedestrians through the implementation of high performance landscapes, infrastructure, and streetscapes.

WASHINGTON MONUMENT

NATIONAL MALL

CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT

OPTIMIZED BUILDING EFFICIENCIES

DISTRICT OPEN SPACE IMPROVEMENTS

U.S. CAPITOL

THE BOLSA CHICA CONSERVANCY CENTER FOR COASTAL ECOLOGY

Huntington Beach, California

ZGF IS DESIGNING THE NEW 10,000 SF CENTER FOR COASTAL ECOLOGY TO INCREASE VISITOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF WATERSHEDS, WETLANDS, AND THE OCEANS TO THE HEALTH OF OUR PLANET.

Recognizing the vital role that science literacy plays in protecting coastal habitats, more than 4,000 SF of exhibition and laboratory space will be dedicated to fostering environmental stewardship through hands-on learning and participation in restoration activities. The program includes a wet laboratory, conference room / library, office space, informational lobby, and a gift shop. A 5,000 SF amphitheater / outdoor classroom will accommodate groups as large as 100 for educational programs, live animal shows, and theatrical presentations. Much in part to the organization’s

mission to restore, educate, and advocate, sustainability is a driver of the project’s design. ZGF is exploring going beyond LEED-Platinum certification to create a net-zero energy and net-zero water project. Net-zero energy strategies will include the use of natural light to meet lighting levels for the majority of daytime hours, passive ventilation, and a building monitoring system.

Photovoltaics will be utilized to generate more energy than is used on site. Net-zero water strategies include high-efficiency fixtures and dry-composting toilets, as well as site-integrated water management systems.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

ENVELOPE

PASSIVE TEMPERATURE CONTROL

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS

INTEGRATED BUILDING AND SITE SYSTEMS

BUILDING MONITORING SYSTEM

WATER-USE REDUCTION MATERIAL RESOURCES ON-SITE RENEWABLE ENERGY: SOLAR GREEN ROOFS HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING SITE LIGHTING RAINWATER HARVESTING ON-SITE TREATMENT AND RE-USE OF WASTEWATER

VENTILATION WITH WIND BLOWING Cross Ventilation

Stack effect / stratification still results in warmer air in high level.

A transom / air path will allow air flow across the floor plate.

High ventilation rates achieved with natural ventilation minimize temperature difference across the building.

VENTILATION UNDER LOW WIND CONDITIONS Buoyancy Ventilation With High and Low Level Openings

Tall ceilings help keep the lower occupied area comfortable. Air warmed up by people, sun, and lights rises up in the space and exhausts from high level.

The sloped roof allows air warmed by the sun to accelerate out of the high level openings.

Cool air enters at low level

BASELINE APPROACH

PROPOSED APPROACH

• Standard efficiency fixtures • Potable water consumption: 670 gallons / week

• High-efficiency fixtures • Dry composting toilets • Potable water consumption: 180 gallons / week

Sinks (41%) Drinking Water (15%)

Sinks (20%)

Toilets (38%)

Drinking Water (5%)

Urinals (15%)

Savings (75%)

POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION FOR INTERNAL BUILDING USES BY DAY (GALLONS) Water Consumption by:

MONDAY

TUESDAY

WEDNESDAY

THURSDAY

FRIDAY

SATURDAY

SUNDAY

WEEKLY TOTAL

Students / Visitors

10.9

21.8

32.6

10.9

32.6

10.9

10.9

131

Office Staff / Volunteers

5.4

5.4

5.4

5.4

5.4

2.7

2.7

32

Water for Exhibits

1.8

3.0

4.2

1.8

4.2

1.5

1.5

18

TOTAL

18

30

42

18

42

15

15

181

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 HEADQUARTERS

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 118.3 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 59.2 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 71.1 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1-1999 Modeled Energy Use: 53.1 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: 75.9 KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 2 LEED Version: NC 2.1 Rating: Gold

Denver, Colorado

IN RESPONSE TO THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S (EPA) MISSION TO “PROTECT THE PUBLIC’S HEALTH AND SAFEGUARD THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH WE LIVE, LEARN, AND WORK,” THE REGION 8 HEADQUARTERS WAS DESIGNED BY ZGF, WITH OPUS ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC., TO BE ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIVE IN BOTH CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION.

Consisting of nine stories of office space, two levels of below-grade parking, and ground-level retail, the new 292,000 SF building is a study in sustainable and mission-driven design. It is located on a remediated brownfield site, is LEED-Gold certified, features Denver’s first eco-roof designed specifically to treat stormwater, and serves as an example of, and a

laboratory for, ongoing research into high-performance, integrated design. Already teams have measured the building’s energy performance, surveyed its occupants with respect to comfort and performance, and observed the performance of its water management systems.

The results of these undertakings have been shared with EPA officials, architects, developers and the general public via publication, conferences and building tours. The long-term hope for the facility is that it not only reflects and enlivens the urban neighborhood in which it is set, but that it will continue to inspire building teams to continue to push the boundaries of aesthetically intriguing sustainable design and urban renewal.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

The fundamental organization of the building encloses a central atrium with two ‘L’-shaped wings; an eight-story ‘L’ that takes the incident solar radiation and provides a roof garden terrace, and a nine-story ‘L’ that takes the brunt of the prevailing winds and shelters the roof terrace.

Glare Analysis of Upper Occupied Floors (with and without the Sails).

Local sky and daylight conditions were studied carefully to derive the best solutions for harvesting natural light. A carefully conceived series of ‘sails’ suspended from the atrium roof was designed not only to drive light down into the space, but also to protect occupants of the upper floors from glare. In the end, the system was fabricated by a local sailmaker in Portland installed by a theatrical rigging company in Denver, and came in at 80% of the budgeted cost.

The green roof not only provides an amenity for occupants, but also performs the legally mandated stormwater quality functions for the project. The City and County of Denver agreed to allow this as a pilot project—possibly to become an accepted regional practice for pollutant removal and runoff control—following a effort in which the design team collaborated with international experts to prove its effectiveness and the EPA agreed to monitor and report its performance for five years of operation.

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

300 PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

VENT FANS

(3.1%) Breakdown by End (10.7%) Energy Use | EPA

DOMESTIC HOT WATER (3.1%)

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

HEATING

(31.3%)

(20.7%)

200

118.3

100

59.2

KEY 2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

0

COOLING LIGHTING

2030c Target based on occupancy date

(7.8%)

(23.3%)

WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT SATISFACTION

KEY

Benchmark EPA, Region 8 Headquarters Pacific Lutheran University, Morken Center UCSB, Donald Bren School Portland State University, Northwest Center

U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL CENTER SOUTH REDEVELOPMENT

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 91 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 36.4 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 36.5 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2007 Modeled Energy Use: 21.9 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: 20.3 KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 3 LEED Version: NC 2009 Rating: Gold (targeted)

Seattle, Washington

ZGF DESIGNED A NEW 209,000 SF OFFICE BUILDING TO PROVIDE A CONSOLIDATED REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS IN SEATTLE FOR THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THE FACILITY FEATURES INNOVATIVE WORKPLACE DESIGN STRATEGIES AND SEEKS TO EXCEED THE CLIENT’S AGGRESSIVE SUSTAINABILITY GOALS.

As part of an integrated design team effort, Sellen Construction and ZGF developed a design solution that balances programmatic, functional, and aesthetic objectives within aggressive budget, schedule, and construction constraints. The design seeks to respect the historic context of the site and the nearby Albert Kahn Building through siting, orientation, building form and massing, material selection, and construction. It also improves pedestrian and vehicular connections

of the larger site and surrounding community, embraces and restores the natural wetlands and environmental character of the Duwamish River, provides a distinctive identity for the Corps that is in keeping with their mission and objectives, and offers employees and visitors a high-performance space that promotes user health, productivity, and performance.

Incorporating innovative sustainable design strategies, the building is seeking LEED-Gold certification.

The completed project will set new standards for high-performance, cost-effective, and sustainable design of workplace environments.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

100% OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE

AIR HANDLER USES HEAT RECOVERY ON EXHAUST AIR TO TEMPER INCOMING VENTILATION AIR

NATURAL CONVECTION EXHAUST

SMOKE EVACUATION

ATRIUM SKYLIGHT

OXBOW SKYLIGHT

PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL TANK FOR EFFICIENT CONDITIONING

RECLAIMED WOOD STRUCTURE AND FINISH MATERIALS HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING

ORIENTATION SPECIFIC SOLAR SHADES RAINWATER HARVESTING STRUCTURAL STEEL PILES WITH INTEGRAL HYDRONIC LOOPS FOR EFFICIENT CONDITIONING

PERIMETER HYDRONIC RADIANT HEATING

CONDITIONED AIR DELIVERED BACK TO UNDERFLOOR

roof drains

toilets irrigation

cistern

UNDERFLOOR AIR FOR VENTILATION AND COOLING

“CHILLED SAILS” HYDRONIC RADIANT COOLING

fluid cooler

toilets

roof drains

source stone features

O G

IN HT IG T

RI

100%

OUTDOOR AIR

FROM 100% IMPERVIOUS

FROM A DECOMMISSIONED

TO

50%

PERVIOUS

WAREHOUSE

VE

REUSED TIMBER

NATIVE, ADAPTIVE LANDSCAPE

300

200

KEY

100

91

SIT

200,000 FT

HIGH-PERFORMANCE HVAC SYSTEM UTILIZES

JU

T EFFE

UM

BUILDING STRONG

COS

DAY L

61%

ER E

OF

IL

OF WATER BASELINE DEMAND

ON

WORK ENVIRONMENT

BU

ATER MANAGEMENT RMW

CTIVE

INTE RIO

RL

AN

DS C

AP

EA

GENT ENVELOPE

ELIMINATE AT LEAST

LEED GOLD HEALTHY BUILDING

N

BY

KBTU/SF/YR

CERTIFICATION

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR EE

STO

ELLE

GR

NG

INT

CE

20.3 30%

OVERALL OF

EUI

AN

EXCEED 2007 ASHRAE 90.1

TI NA

OF

FORM

DI

N

FIC

L EF

OO

HIGH PER

ATE RPL

2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy

36.4

0

LEED / Code baseline 2030c Target based on occupancy date

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY LI KA SHING CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 726.1 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 290.4 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 427.1 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: CA Title 24-2005 Modeled Energy Use: 221.7 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Gold

AFTER COMPLETING A SERIES OF STUDIES TO REPLACE UC BERKELEY’S WARREN HALL WITH UP-TO-DATE LABORATORY FACILITIES, ZGF PROGRAMMED AND DESIGNED A 204,365 SF REPLACEMENT RESEARCH BUILDING.

Located in the northwest quadrant of the campus, the Center is the focus for the biomedical sciences.

The facility houses interdisciplinary programs in new fields of research on the molecular mechanisms of disease, with a focus on cancer, the brain, infectious agents and stem cell biology. It provides a major expansion of a brain imaging center that includes two human MRIs and one animal MRI as well as other imaging equipment, a teaching laboratory, a 300-seat auditorium, an 80-seat classroom, conference rooms, interaction spaces and a limited number of faculty

Berkeley, California

and staff offices. Several labs are designed to BSL3 requirements. The project is LEED-Gold certified and also incorporates Labs21 environmental performance criteria.

Sustainable building systems and features include expansive glazing and filtered daylight in 90% of spaces, natural ventilation from operable windows, low-e glass with integrated sunscreens, terra cotta rain screen, thick board-formed concrete walls, and stainless steel shingles, occupancy sensors that control light based on outdoor light levels.

The building also includes wood certified from the Forest Stewardship Council.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

LABORATORY / SUPPORT / PUBLIC ZONE SECTION

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

800 726.1

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY (1.3%) HEAT REJECT

VENT FANS

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

Energy Breakdown by End Use | UCB Li KaShing (1.8%) (1.3%) (12.6%)

600

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (29.4%) EXTERIOR USAGE (0.2%)

400 290.4 KEY

200

LIGHTING (3.5%) COOLING (4.5%)

Actual energy

(45.3%)

LEED / Code baseline

0

BUILDING-MONITORING SYSTEM Real-time display in public areas of building energy and water usage. Integrated color display continuously signals the most favorable time to open or close windows, based on outside temperature conditions.

REGIONAL MATERIALS Local aggregates in terrazzo All California clay used in locally produced ceramic tiles RAPIDLY RENEWABLE MATERIALS Bamboo laboratory casework.

OPERABLE USER-CONTROLLED EXTERIOR SUNSCREEN SHUTTERS Preserve views to the bay while reducing solar heat gain and glare on the west-facing office windows.

Provide southwest sun protection in the open position.

RECYCLED CONTENTS Low-emitting rubber floors in laboratory and carpet in offices. Recycled aggregates in terrazzo. Recycling of concrete board-forming wood.

WATER USE REDUCTION 30% reduction.

2030c Baseline Energy model

HEATING

2030c Target based on occupancy date

OPTIMIZED ENERGY USE PERFORMANCE Reduced lab air change rate. Night flushing.

Mechanical separation of lab zone, office, conference and public zone.

Low pressure drop.

GREEN ROOFS Adaptive native plantings provide habitat for bees, insects and birds. Stormwater mitigation.

Insulating heat island and cooling effect.

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING Palette of local plant species minimizes the need for maintenance and irrigation.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY UNIT 2

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 161.9 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 64.8 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 115.6 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004 Modeled Energy Use: 84.1 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Platinum (targeted)

ZGF HAS PLANNED AND DESIGNED A NEW BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY ON THE UCSD HEALTH SCIENCES CAMPUS TO ACCOMMODATE GROWTH AND HOUSE A NEW MULTI-DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM IN GENOMIC MEDICINE AND AN EXPANDED DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSCIENCES.

The five-story, 190,000 SF project incorporates wet bench laboratories, laboratory core facilities, laboratory support, administrative offices, vivarium and conference space for Health Sciences interdisciplinary programs, including medical genomics. The project is targeting LEED-Platinum certification with the incorporation of high-performance features such as a dynamic, climate-responsive exterior solar shading system on the east, west and south facades that eliminates

La Jolla, California

solar gain while optimizing daylight. The project also includes a water reclamation system that will collect approximately 890,000 gallons per year from air handler condensate, primarily during the dry summer season in conditions of coastal fog and humidity, which in turn will reduce potable water use for landscape irrigation by 100 percent and for toilets by more than 50 percent.

LABORATORIES

DAYLIGHT ZONE

VISION ZONE

FIXED SUNSHADE

AUTOMATED (COMPUTER-CONTROLLED) RETRACTABLE EXTERIOR BLINDS

SOLAR SHADING Dynamic exterior shading reduces cooling load and energy use by keeping lab space at optimal ventilation rate for safety, while enabling daylighting through the redirection of sunlight, a “tuned” ceiling shape, and photo-sensor controlled dimming of indirect interior lighting fixtures.

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

Energy

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

(3.8%) Breakdown

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

EXTERIOR USAGE

(8.8%)

(1%)

VENT FANS

by End Use | UCSD School of Med 2 (5.5%)

HEATING

(4.7%)

HEAT REJECT

300

(1%) COOLING (8.1%)

200 161.9 KEY LIGHTING (11.3%)

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (55.9%)

WATER RE-USE Non-potable water is collected (from numerous sources within the building and from the adjacent lab), filtered, and stored on site.

WATER-USE REDUCTION All plumbing is low-flow and toilets are dual-plumbed for non-potable water, cutting potable water use by more than 50 percent.

LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Non-potable water provides 100 percent of landscape irrigation.

100

2030c Baseline Energy model

64.8

Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

OPERABLE WINDOWS All private- and shared-office spaces incorporate operable windows.

CONTINUED RESEARCH Specialized systems have been included for energy submetering, monitoring and optimizing ongoing operations, and building design research.

ON-SITE STORMWATER TREATMENT Bioswales capture and filter stormwater runoff.

OPTIMIZED VENTILATION Fume hoods and separated procedure rooms in labs enhance researcher safety while reducing energy. All concentrated occupancy spaces have CO2 sensors, and displacement ventilation in offices supplies higher quality, cleaner air with less energy.

EXTERNAL SHADING A combination of fixed and operable external shades eliminates direct solar heat gain and glare.

OPTIMIZED EXHAUST To save energy, laboratory exhaust fans have been designed to reduce speed in calm wind conditions.

INTEGRATED DAYLIGHT Curved ceiling in laboratories optimizes daylight distribution; electric lights respond automatically to daylight levels.

SUSTAINABLE BUILDING MATERIALS Building materials have been selected for low-VOC emissions, recycled content and local sourcing; a majority of the project’s wood is FSC certified.

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD CIRM CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE AND STEM CELL RESEARCH Los Angeles, California

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 354.3 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 141.7 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 253.06 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004 Modeled Energy Use: 256.59 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Gold

INSPIRED BY THE CLIENT’S PRIMARY OBJECTIVES FOR THIS PROJECT, ZGF PROGRAMMED AND DESIGNED A BUILDING THAT PHYSICALLY EMBODIES THE CLIENT’S NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENT THAT FOSTERS COLLABORATION, DISCOVERIES AND EXPANSION.

The 91,485 SF Eli and Edythe Broad CIRM Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research provides a permanent home for stem cell research in the University’s first LEED-Gold building on the Health Sciences Campus. The first floor is dedicated to public functions, with a lobby and large seminar room. The four floors above consist of open, flexible laboratories organized in a transparent neighborhood scheme, which sets this building apart from other laboratory facilities in that there are no obstructions across the

width of the building. This unique arrangement provides visual connections between program elements and allows flexibility for future modifications. Interaction areas on every floor further promote collaboration.

An innovative, high-performance glass envelope brings natural light deep into the interior while serving as an integral part of the building’s operating system. The west façade utilizes angled glass fins to reduce glare.

The east façade features a ventilated double-glass wall, which acts as a buffer to moderate interior temperatures, reduces solar gain, and creates oblique views with its play of transparent and translucent glass.

The building is a R&D Magazine Laboratory of the Year High Honors Award recipient.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

400 354.3

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY (0.6%) VENT FANS HEAT REJECT (0.2%)

(13.5%)

Energy Breakdown by End Use | Broad

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

300

(5.4%)

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (15.8%)

EXTERIOR USAGE (0.1%)

200 141.7 KEY

100 LIGHTING

2030c Baseline Energy model

(1.7%)

Actual energy

HEATING COOLING (35.6%)

SOLAR CONTROL A double skin façade on the east elevation reduces energy consumption while solar fins on the west elevation help reduce glare to the building interior.

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS Indirect and controlled lighting in all normally occupied spaces and light harvesting controls in the laboratories reduce or eliminate the need for electric lighting during the daylight hours.

TEMPERATURE CONTROL Chilled beams are used to remove heat from the laboratories using water instead of the traditional air systems.

COMMISSIONING Enhanced commissioning will significantly improve researcher comfort, reduce energy costs and reduce ongoing maintenance costs by ensuring that the systems are operating as intended.

RECYCLED CONTENT Rapidly renewable wood products such as bamboo veneer doors and architectural casework.

LEED / Code baseline

(27%)

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

LOW-EMITTING PRODUCTS The use of low-emitting adhesives for carpets / fabrics will improve the indoor air quality and the associated well being of the researchers conducting stem cell research.

LIGHT POLLUTION REDUCTION Light fixtures located internally and externally to the building are “Dark Sky Friendly” and thereby, minimize light pollution.

LANDSCAPE DESIGN The project has used native species that require less irrigation and maintenance.

HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION Low Albido materials are used on the roof surfaces to mitigate the building heat island effect on the local environment.

WATER-USE REDUCTION Using plumbing fixtures with flush valves and flow restrictors significantly reduces the consumption of water by over 30% for the building.

TRANSPORTATION Reduction of transportation impacts include the USC bus service, bike storage with readily available showers, and preferred parking for fuel efficient cars.

SOKA UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER AND WANGARI MAATHAI

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 120 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 48 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 127.47 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004 Modeled Energy Use: 98.55 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Gold

THE NEW PERFORMING ARTS CENTER AND WANGARI MAATHAI HALL, DESIGNED BY ZGF, ON SOKA UNIVERSITY’S ALISO VIEJO CAMPUS WAS ENVISIONED AS A WORLD-CLASS FACILITY TO OFFER EXCEPTIONAL ACOUSTICS FOR A VARIETY OF PERFORMANCES FOR THE CAMPUS AND BROADER COMMUNITY.

The project consists of two adjoining buildings. The three-level, 47,836 SF Performing Arts Center offers several seating-in-the-round configurations—from 723 seats to 1,200 seats—to accommodate an array of events, from concerts to convocations. The four-level, 48,974 SF Wangari Maathai Hall offers 11 classrooms, 29 faculty offices, and a 180-seat Black Box Theatre (5,600 SF). Both of the performance spaces are served by common support spaces, including a loading dock,

Aliso Viejo, California

a green room, dressing rooms, musician warm-up rooms, a dance rehearsal studio, laundry facilities, and storage spaces. The design of the new facilities seamlessly integrates with the existing campus and adjacent buildings to create a warm and inviting feel.

Sustainability was also a central component of the project. Featuring green roofs, photovoltaic panels, and other energy saving elements, the project has achieved LEED-Gold certification.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

VENT FANS

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

EXTERIOR USAGE

(14.4%)

Energy Breakdown by End Use | SOKA (10.8%)

(0.7%)

(0.4%)

300

HEATING (10.5%)

200

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

120

100

(20.1%)

KEY 2030c Baseline Energy model

48 LIGHTING (8.7%)

Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

COOLING (34.5%)

GREEN ROOFS Vegetated roofs help to mitigate heat gain in the building, increase the lifespan of the roof, and help to manage and treat stormwater runoff.

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS Photovoltaic panels located along the top row of windows of the Performing Arts Center lobby and on the roof generate an estimated 7.5 percent of the energy the facility uses.

SOLAR SHADING Fixed sunshades on the Center’s exterior are designed to reduce heat gain in the main lobby, yet permit visibility.

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS The building’s orientation, and the use of indirect and controlled daylighting in all normally occupied spaces, other than the main performance hall and Black Box Theater, reduce or eliminate the need for electric lighting during daylight hours.

RECYCLED CONTENT At least 20% of materials used in the building, based on value, were produced from recycled content.

WATER-USE REDUCTION Low-flow water fixtures and high-efficiency instantaneous gas water heaters conserve water, resulting in 45 percent less water usage than a conventionally designed building.

Additionally, reclaimed water is utilized for site irrigation.

DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE YAWKEY CENTER FOR CANCER CARE Boston, Massachusetts

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 489.8 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 195.9 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 349.9 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004 Modeled Energy Use: 346.5 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 2 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Gold

ZGF, IN ASSOCIATION WITH MILLER DYER SPEARS, DESIGNED DANA-FARBER’S NEWEST CLINICAL FACILITY AND NEW SIGNATURE IMAGE.

The 285,000 SF building provides space on over 14 floors for 100 examination rooms, 150 infusion chairs, an expanded clinical research center, and public services for dining, retail, and quiet reflection.

The facility also includes seven levels of underground parking with connections to other Dana-Farber Cancer Institute buildings that link to affiliated hospitals, bringing research and clinical staff into close proximity.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute’s primary goal for the Yawkey Center was to create a state-of-the-art clinical building that promotes personalized, multidisciplinary, safe, respectful, and compassionate cancer care for patients and families in a healing environment. Other

goals were to stimulate translation of research into the care of patients, optimize flexibility and utility of space, streamline the flow of patients and materials, minimize wait and treatment times, foster productivity and collaboration among staff, and create a new front entrance and presence. The project is LEED-Gold certified, and served as a pilot in the Green Guide for Healthcare v2.2 initiative.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

500 489.9 PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

400

(0.1%) VENT FANS MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (2%) LIGHTING

(17%)

Energy Breakdown by End Use | Dana Farber

EXTERIOR USAGE (3.6%)

(4.8%)

300

200 195.9 COOLING (31.4%)

HEATING (41%)

100

KEY 2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

0

2030c Target based on occupancy date

GREEN ROOFS Green roofs located on the 4th, 11th, 12th, 14th, and 15th floors include native and non-invasive adaptive plantings to mitigate stormwater runoff and to provide habitat for local fauna.

all-purpose cleaners utilize neutral, non-toxic ingredients, and auto-scrubbers used to clean the floors use electro-magnetic technology and ionized water instead of chemicals to disinfect.

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING The Center utilizes lighting operated by daylight-sensors that automatically reduces artificial lighting in public areas when daylight is available. All light fixtures are energyefficient and use low-mercury, long-life bulbs.

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 100% outside air is used for all clinical spaces. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s), persistent biotoxins, and other health hazards are minimized in the interior finishes.

WATER-USE REDUCTION All toilets use low-flow plumbing fixtures. Sink faucets, where applicable, are equipped with motion sensors, leading to a 55% reduction in water use.

FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL CERTIFIED WOOD The eucalyptus used throughout the building conforms to requirements of the Forest Stewardship Council. This ensures the sustainable logging of trees and the use of plantation grown wood.

ON-SITE ENERGY A heat recovery system transfers the heat from either intake or exhaust air, depending on the season, in order to reduce the amount of energy needed to bring the incoming air to a comfortable temperature.

GREEN CLEANING Environmental Services staff use a flat mop system that utilizes less water to clean floors. Window and

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT An extensive construction waste management plan was implemented during construction to minimize noise, dust, and runoff pollution. This resulted in 50% of all construction debris being diverted from landfills through recycling.

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA THE UVA EMILY COURIC CLINICAL CANCER CENTER

ENERGY USE • • • • • • • • •

2030c Baseline: 472.8 KBTU / SF / YR 2030c Target: 189.1 KBTU / SF / YR LEED Baseline: 337.7 KBTU / SF / YR Energy Code: ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004 Modeled Energy Use: 302.7 KBTU / SF / YR Actual Energy Use: TBD KBTU / SF / YR Climate Zone: 4 LEED Version: NC 2.2 Rating: Gold

ZGF PROGRAMMED AND DESIGNED THE 150,000 SF EMILY COURIC CLINICAL CANCER CENTER TO CONSOLIDATE FUNCTIONS THAT ARE DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE HEALTH SYSTEM COMPLEX AND TO INTEGRATE EDUCATION AND PATIENT SUPPORT WITH TREATMENT AND CLINICAL TRIALS.

Patient treatment areas include clinics, a specialty women’s oncology clinic, infusion and radiation therapy centers, dispensing and infusion pharmacies, and special procedure rooms. Following a commitment to promote the physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of the patients, the facility is designed to foster patient- and family-focused care. Family and patient amenities include a patient support services /counseling suite, education and activity

Charlottesville, Virginia

rooms, massage therapy rooms, enclosed garden spaces, and a meditation room. The design provides an architecturally coherent front door for the Heath System, clarifies the vehicular and pedestrian entrances to the University Hospital and the Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, and provides rational connections to a new enclosed pedestrian circulation system that will ultimately connect all present and future Health System facilities. The project is LEED-Gold certified.

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STRATEGIES

ENERGY END USE

ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI) IN KBTU / SF / YR

*Because of rounding, these totals may not add up to 100%

500 472.8

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (27%)

400 PUMPS AND AUXILIARY

Energy Breakdown by End Use | UVA EMILY (4.7%) C.

VENT FANS (0.6%)

300

200 189.1

LIGHTING (3.6%)

HEATING (33%) COOLING

100

(31.1%)

KEY 2030c Baseline Energy model Actual energy LEED / Code baseline

0 INTEGRATED BUILDING SYSTEMS The building envelope and systems design has resulted in a 23.5% reduction in energy costs compared to a similar building designed to current building and HVAC codes. Building skin components with high insulating and solar heat gain characteristics, coupled with a complete perimeter air seal system, manage heat gain and loss.

NATURAL DAYLIGHTING The building orientation and exterior wall system design bring extensive natural light into circulation and waiting spaces, where it provides the greatest benefit to patients.

Natural light is carefully managed by thoughtful space planning, and a system of mechanized shades controlled by light sensors.

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Emphasis was placed on indoor environmental quality including the direct exhaust of high volume copiers, bathrooms, and janitor closets; the use of low Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) products; and the implementation of UVA’s Green Clean Program.

SITE LIGHTING Site lighting strategies meet the stringent security needs of the campus and are designed to reduce light pollution.

2030c Target based on occupancy date

RECYCLED CONTENT Several rooms were identified for the use of “experimental” finishes with minimal environmental impact, including casework and counter surfaces fabricated from wheat board, recycled, and sustainably harvested forest products.

NATIVE LOW-WATER LANDSCAPING A palette of local plant species minimizes the need for maintenance, irrigation, and creates natural habitat for local wildlife.

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT During construction, over 90% of the construction waste was diverted from the landfill / incineration. In addition, the building will be a part of UVA’s award-winning recycling program that diverts over 40% of materials campus wide.

ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION Extensive transit services, a centralized, interconnected parking system that supports ‘one stop’ parking to serve patient visits, a highly walkable environment with protected pedestrian connections, and a strong bicycling culture all contribute to a healthy, low-impact transportation environment.

ZGF LEED CERTIFIED OR REGISTERED PROJECTS CI = LEED for Commercial Interiors NC = LEED for New Construction

CS = LEED for Core and Shell ND = LEED for Neighborhood Development

EB = LEED for Existing Buildings

PLATINUM LEVEL BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER Miami, Florida Intent to register LEED-NC v2009 CATERPILLAR VISITOR CENTER Peoria, Illinois Registered LEED-NC 2.1 CLIF BAR HEADQUARTERS Emeryville, California Registered LEED-CI v2009 CONRAD N. HILTON FOUNDATION, NEW OFFICE CAMPUS Agoura Hills, California Registered LEED-NC 2.2 DUKE UNIVERSITY, NICHOLAS SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT Durham, North Carolina Intent to register LEED-NC v2009 J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE LA JOLLA La Jolla, California Registered LEED-NC 2.2 KING STREET STATION RENOVATION Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-NC 2.2 PORT OF PORTLAND, HEADQUARTERS & LONG-TERM PARKING GARAGE Portland, Oregon Registered LEED-NC 2.2 TWELVE | WEST MIXED-USE BUILDING Portland, Oregon Certified Platinum LEED-NC 2.1 Registered LEED-CI 2.0 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, DONALD BREN SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT Santa Barbara, California Certified Platinum LEED-NC 1.0 (Pilot Program) Certified Platinum LEED-EB 2.0 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY UNIT 2 La Jolla, California

Registered LEED-NC 2.2

GOLD LEVEL COURTSIDE MIXED-USE STUDENT HOUSING Eugene, Oregon Registered LEED-NC v2009

DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, YAWKEY CENTER FOR CANCER CARE Boston, Massachusetts Registered LEED-NC 2.2 DICKINSON COLLEGE, STUART HALL AND JAMES HALL SCIENCE BUILDING Carlisle, Pennsylvania Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1 FIFTH AND COLUMBIA TOWER Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-CS 2.0 HINES, FOURTH & MADISON Seattle, Washington Certified Gold LEED-EB 2.0 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, BIORENEWABLES COMPLEX PHASE II, AGRICULTURAL AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING Ames, Iowa

Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2

JONATHAN ROSE COMPANIES, JOSEPH VANCE AND STERLING BUILDINGS Seattle, Washington Certified Gold LEED-EB 2.0 KING COUNTY, CHINOOK OFFICE BUILDING Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-CI 2.0 / Registered LEED-CS 2.0 L’ENFANT PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING, Washington, DC Registered LEED-CS v2009 MICROSOFT, BUILDING 88 Redmond, Washington Certified Gold LEED-CI 2.0 NINTENDO OF AMERICA HEADQUARTERS Redmond, Washington Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, RICHARD AND BARBARA SILVERMAN HALL FOR MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS Evanston, Illinois Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1 PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY, MORKEN CENTER FOR LEARNING AND TECHNOLOGY Tacoma, Washington Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.0 PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHWEST CENTER FOR ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Portland, Oregon Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1 PROMONTORY AT CITY CREEK, AT CITY CREEK Salt Lake City, Utah Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 RICHARDS COURT WEST AND EAST AT CITY CREEK Salt Lake City, Utah Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 SEATTLE CHILDREN’S, BUILDING HOPE: CANCER AND CRITICAL CARE EXPANSION Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-NC 2.2

SKYBOX APARTMENTS Eugene, Oregon Registered LEED-NC v2009 SOKA UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, WANGARI MAATHAI HALL Aliso Viejo, California

Registered LEED-NC 2.2

STANCORP REAL ESTATE, TANASBOURNE HOME OFFICE BUILDINGS 1 AND 2 Hillsboro, Oregon Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, EDNA LUCILLE GOODRICH BUILDING Tumwater, Washington Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.0 THE FALLS AT CITY CREEK Salt Lake City, Utah Certified Gold LEED-CS 2.0 THE REGENT AT CITY CREEK Salt Lake City, Utah Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA CANCER CENTER, Phoenix, AZ Registered LEED-NC v2009 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON, ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BUILDING Arlington, Texas Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 8 HEADQUARTERS Denver, Colorado Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1 U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ST. ELIZABETHS EAST-WEST CAMPUSES Washington, DC Registered LEED-NC v2009 U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, FEDERAL CENTER SOUTH REDEVELOPMENT Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-NC v2009 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, LI KA-SHING CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES Berkeley, California

Registered LEED-CI 2.0

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, SOUTH TOWER SEISMIC RENOVATION Los Angeles, California Registered LEED-NC v2009 UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, LIFE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARK, RESEARCH + DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 1 Miami, Florida Certified Gold LEED-CS 2.0 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, THE ELI AND EDYTHE BROAD CIRM CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE AND STEM CELL RESEARCH Los Angeles, California Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.2 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, THE UVA EMILY COURIC CLINICAL CANCER CENTER Charlottesville, Virginia Registered LEED-NC 2.2 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, MOLECULAR ENGINEERING & SCIENCES BUILDING Seattle Washington Registered LEED-NC 2.2

VA AMERICAN LAKE BUILDING 201 AMBULATORY MEDICAL BUILDING, Tacoma, Washington Registered LEED-NC v2009 WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY, KANEKO COMMONS Salem, Oregon Certified Gold LEED-NC 2.1

SILVER LEVEL ANN & ROBERT H. LURIE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO Chicago, Illinois Registered LEED-NC 2.2 CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS San Luis Obispo, California

Registered LEED-NC v2009

CITY CREEK REDEVELOPMENT, BLOCKS 75 AND 76 (BUILDINGS 1, 2, 4-7) Salt Lake City, Utah Registered LEED-ND 1.0 (Pilot Program) COMMUNITY OF HOPE / CITYINTERESTS LLC, HEALTH AND RESOURCE CENTER Washington, DC Intent to Register LEED-NC v2009 DUKE UNIVERSITY, FITZPATRICK CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING, MEDICINE AND APPLIED SCIENCES Durham, North Carolina

Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.1

EMORY UNIVERSITY, HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH BUILDING Atlanta, Georgia Registered LEED-NC v2009 MAX PLANCK FLORIDA INSTITUTE, RESEARCH BUILDING Jupiter, Florida Registered LEED-NC 2.2 MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER, THE MORTIMER B. ZUCKERMAN RESEARCH CENTER New York, New York Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.0 MICROSOFT, BUILDING 83 Redmond, Washington Registered LEED-CI 2.0 NORTH LOT DEVELOPMENT LLC MIXED USE PROJECT Seattle, Washington Registered LEED-CI 2.0 OREGON CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION Portland, Oregon Certified Silver LEED-EB 2.0 (Pilot Program) OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH BUILDING Portland, Oregon Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.1 REED COLLEGE, BIDWELL, SITKA, ASPEN, AND SEQUOIA HOUSES Portland, Oregon Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.2 REGIONAL LEARNING ALLIANCE Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.0 STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT CORTLAND, BOWERS HALL UPGRADE TO SCIENCE HALL PHASE I Cortland, New York Certified Silver LEED-NC 2.0

THE CASCADE AT CITY CREEK Salt Lake City, Utah Registered LEED-NC 2.2 THE ELIOT TOWER Portland, Oregon Certified Silver LEED-ND 1.0 (Pilot Program) THE SCIENCE CENTER, PHILADELPHIA, 3711 MARKET STREET Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Certified Silver LEED-CS 2.0 UNCH HOSPITAL AT HILLSBOROUGH Hillsborough, North Carolina Registered LEED-NC v2009 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, ALTMAN CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE La Jolla, California Registered LEED-NC v2009 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE SCIENCE Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Intent to register LEED-NC v2009 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PUBLIC HEALTH COMMAND LABORATORY REPLACEMENT Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD

Registered LEED-NC v2009

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, COMMUNITY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER Washington, DC Registered LEED-CI v2009 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, SIGNATURE ENGINEERING RESEARCH BUILDING Blacksburg, Virginia

Registered LEED-NC 2.2

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PAUL G. ALLEN GLOBAL ANIMAL HEALTH BUILDING Pullman, Washington Registered LEED-NC v2009

CERTIFIED LEVEL CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL COLORADO, EAST WING ADDITION Denver, Colorado Registered LEED-NC v2009 EXEMPLA ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL Denver, CO Intent to register LEED-HC v2009 FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER, ROBERT M. ARNOLD BUILDING Seattle, Washington Certified LEED-NC 2.1 GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY, LE SHANA HALL Newberg, Oregon Certified LEED-NC 2.1 MICROSOFT, BUILDINGS 30, 31 AND 32 Redmond, Washington Certified LEED-EB 1.0 (Pilot Program) NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND, SCHEMATIC DESIGN Sofia, Bulgaria Certified LEED-NC 2.0

PFIZER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CAMPUS La Jolla, California Certified LEED-NC 2.0 PORT TOWNSEND, HASTINGS BUILDING RENOVATION Port Townsend, Washington Intent to register LEED-NC v2009 SELLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Seattle, Washington Certified LEED-EB 2.0 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, MARINE SCIENCES BUILDING Santa Barbara, California Certified LEED-NC 2.1 ZGF SEATTLE OFFICE Seattle, Washington Certified LEED-CI 1.0 (Pilot Program)

PORTLAND 1223 SW Washington Street Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97205 T 503.224.3860

LOS ANGELES 515 South Flower Street Suite 3700 Los Angeles, California 90071 T 213.617.1901

NEW YORK 419 Park Avenue South 20th Floor New York, New York 10016 T 212.624.4754

SEATTLE 925 Fourth Avenue Suite 2400 Seattle, Washington 98104 T 206.623.9414

WASHINGTON, DC 1800 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 T 202.380.3120

www.zgf.com

Printed on recycled paper.