j ustin w brammer P: 937 430 5926 E: justinbrammer@gmail.com
327 Graham Ave. 3R Brooklyn, NY 11211
1
contents Professional and Published Work Academic and Research Work
Contact Info: p: 937 430 5926 e: justinbrammer@gmail.com
2
Iconic Greenhouse
4
Drawing set for a 10,000 square meter greenhouse in Abu Dhabi w/ Leeser Architecture
12
Double Agency
The Institutional Public Threshold and Urban Representation Advisor: Martin Haettasch, Readers: Albert Pope and Sarah Whiting
Tower D
20
72-Story Tower in NYC Hudson Yards Development w/ DS+R & Rockwell Group
26
A School in Five Bladders
Exploring Learning Space Through Morphological and Typological Adjustments Studio Critics: Dawn Finley and Gordon Wittenberg
Dock St. Façade Design proposal for an apartment building adjacent to the Brooklyn Bridge w/ Leeser Architecture
32 Contemporary Arts Museum
36
Fluctuating Space in Houston Studio Critic: Doug Oliver
D-33
42
Installation at P.P.O.W. Gallery in New York, NY w/ Sarah Oppenheimer / Folding Enterprises
Hyperdike 46 PIER 1 COMPETITION
Repurposing Galveston Through Economic and Ecological Infrastructure Studio Critics: Christopher Hight w/ Michael Robinson
52
Condo and Hotel Development on the Brooklyn Waterfront w/ Leeser Architecture
A Tree Grows in Houston 56 Sowwah Central
Hybrid Typologies and Housing Infrastructure in Houston’s Fifth Ward Studio Critic: Albert Pope
Design and presentation of roof structure, funicular, and interactive space w/ LAB @ Rockwell Group
66 The New Natural Photographic Essay Published in Cite, PLAT
62
Adaptive Folding Structural Skins Parametric analysis and fabrication of folding structural facades @ The Bartlett, UCL, London
70
3
ICONIC G R E E N H O U S E Design for a 10,000 square meter greenhouse, UNDER CONSTRUCTION w/ Leeser Architecture Involvement includes: SD, DD and CD development This greenhouse is conceived as three overlapping masses, each circle contains a separate biome with different atmospheric conditions. The overlapping volume is an atrium space feeding to the three biomes (spring, summer, and winter climates). Complex environmental issues arise when building these climates in the Middle Eastern desert. The roof and exterior elevations are comprised of ETFE, a system using pillows of plastic to give maximum atmospheric control and visual transparency. My involvement was with the development of the DD and CD drawing sets. Specifically, I focused on the structure of the building, detailing the undulating roof structure and supporting columns. This showcasing concentrates on my individual contribution to the project.
vernalized biome
tropical biome
central space
mediterranean biome
4
columns // structural support through a field of cylindrical columns
atrium // hanging atrium supported by biome structures
rendering [above] // view over building roof and atrium space roof system // composed of bent steel members infilled with ETFE pillows
exterior surface // series of columns insulated with ETFE
5
photographs [above] // construction progress rendering [below] // exterior elevation perspective
plan [above] // first level plan drawing
7
photographs [above] // construction progress detail [right] // column connection detail rendering [below] // interior biome perspective
6
TYPE 1 COLUMN BASE DETAIL SCALE 1:20
1
BIOME SCALE
TOP
8
7
TYPE 2 COLUMN BASE DETAIL SCALE 1:20
2
BIOME SCALE
3000
7397 3000
28
29
3000
7781 30
3000
3000
3000
31
3000
+ 13801 TOP OF RINGBEAM
32
33
3000
3000
34
35
3000 11236
36
3000
37
3000
32
33
3000
3000
34
35
3000 11236
36
3000
37
3000
38
3000
3617
NOTES
39
• • 2011 LEESER ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
+ 15272 38 39 TOP OF RINGBEAM 3000 3000 • •• ••••• • •• •••••
-
+ 15272 TOP OF RINGBEAM
-
7781
7397
3000
• •• •••••
3617
4246
• •• •••••
• • 2011 LEESER ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
798 5
8991
187
800
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB
800 3900
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB + 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
4750 715
6142
3900
+ 13312 TOP OF RINGBEAM
931
12322
2795
-
753 9 1554
250 1644
250
1173
250
1554
1644
250
250 250
1173
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB + 2.00 m STREET LEVEL + 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
4578
9062
2547
2876
7839
6638
ROOF SECTION @ N-AXIS RINGBEAM 2TOP OFBIOME SCALE 1:100
2547
2876
+ 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
4851
8517
4851
8517
2759 + 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB + 12774 TOP OF RINGBEAM
4578
9062
7839
2759
82 58
1656 250 18
9
82
8 665
1290 250 187 1290 250 187
1656 250 18
9
1251 251 1251 251
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB + 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
2047
3233
12124
CLI
2261
7360
-
2817 + 12486 TOP OF RINGBEAM
2047
12124
7360
09.0
Al Saadah Street, Villa No. 2/B 79 Beside Malaysian Embassy P.O.Box 34342, Abu Dhabi. UAE TEL: +971 2 414 8754 FAX: +971 2 448 8899
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
REVIS
CLI
PROJECT MANAG
-
2817
4 Al Saadah Street, Villa No. 2/B 79 Beside Malaysian Embassy P.O.Box 34342, Abu Dhabi. UAE TEL: +971 2 414 8754 FAX: +971 2 448 8899
+ 12486 TOP OF RINGBEAM
91
39
54
659 6
2261
60
5
3233
4
100% DETAIL DESIGN
0
• •• •••••
5th Flr ROYAL GROUP Headquarters P.O. Box 5151 Abu Dhabi, UAE Tel: +9712 811 1111 Fax: +9712 811 1112
PROJECT MANAG
LEAD CONSULT
• •• •••••
1821
1576 250
1376 250
250
5 652
188
250
1576 250
188
1376 250
7
7
20 Jay Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 P.O. BOX 111992 ABU DHABI , U.A.E Telephone: +718 643 6656 Fax: +718 643 6945 TEL (+971) 26350002 , FAX (+971) 26350008 www.leeser.com
WWW.MZ-ARCHITECTS.COM
1821
6 659
1176 249 18 8
LOCAL CONSULT + 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB
18
18
1176 249 18 8
7
91 54
18
7
39
18
60
5th Flr ROYAL GROUP Headquarters P.O. Box 5151 20 Jay Brooklyn, NewFax: York+9712 11201 Abu Dhabi, UAEStreet Tel: +9712 811 1111 811 1112 Telephone: +718 643 6656 Fax: +718 643 6945 www.leeser.com LEAD CONSULT
LOCAL CONSULT
STRUCTURAL CONSULT
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB + 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
BIOME ROOF AXIS @ L-AXIS SCALE 1:100
P.O. BOX 111992 ABU DHABI , U.A.E TEL (+971) 26350002 , FAX (+971) 26350008 WWW.MZ-ARCHITECTS.COM
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB 10298
4230
4
09.0
REVIS
+ 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
170
BIOME ROOF AXIS @ L-AXIS SCALE 1:100
100% DETAIL DESIGN
0
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
+ 12749 TOP OF RINGBEAM
4
3
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ M-AXIS SCALE 1:100 + 12749 TOP OF RINGBEAM 170
-
+ 12774 TOP OF RINGBEAM
58
665
sections [above] // showing column and roof structure photograph [below] // interior constuction image
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ M-AXIS SCALE 1:100
652
3
3
• •• •••••
170
3
-
• •• •••••
6638
8
+ 13029 TOP OF RINGBEAM
2
• •• •••••
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ N-AXIS SCALE 1:100
170
LEGEND
679 4
9
753
7 A416
3
776
7 A416
2
+ 13312 TOP OF RINGBEAM
170
+ 13029
-
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
• •• •••••
11155
+ 13322 TOP OF RINGBEAM
2
+ 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
2795
827
3274
11155
LEGEND
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
679 4
170
931
12322
715
6142
827
3274
KEY PLAN
KEY PLAN
4750
1171 250
800 249 188 BIOME ROOF SECTION @ O-AXIS SCALE 1:100
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ O-AXIS SCALE 1:100 + 13322 TOP OF RINGBEAM
1
187
1171 250
1007 250 1007 250
189
800 249 188
189
1
NOTES
8991
798 5
• •• •••••
1
1
• •• •••••
+ 13801 TOP OF RINGBEAM
187
7803
1442
+ 13056 TOP OF RINGBEAM
+ 12519 TOP OF RINGBEAM
10298
4230
+ 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
-
7803 665 3
-
1442
9 Prussia Street, Dublin 7, Ireland Telephone: +353 1 868 2000 Fax: +353 1 868 2100 www.ocsc.ie
5
MEP CONSULT
• •• •••••
10838
+ 13056 TOP OF RINGBEAM
STRUCTURAL CONSULT
+ 2.00 m STREET LEVEL
10838
9 Prussia Street, Dublin 7, Ireland Telephone: +353 1 868 2000 Fax: +353 1 868 2100 19 Perseverance Works www.ocsc.ie 38 Kingsland Road London E2 8DD Telephone: +44 020 7749 5950 Fax: 44 020 7729 5388 www.atelierten.com MEP CONSULT
5
+ 12519 TOP OF RINGBEAM
89
60 1439 250
1300 250 188
Project Title
1439 250
1300 250 188
8
18
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ K-AXIS SCALE 1:100
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
ADIG-LSA-ARC-DRW- 416 ICONIC GREENHOUSE A416
Drawing No.
+ 5.20 m TOP OF SLAB + 2.00 m STREET LEVEL + 0.50 m TOP OF CELLAR SLAB
26
ICONIC GREENHOUSE Document No. Project Title
BIOME ROOF SECTION @ K-AXIS SCALE 1:100 25
5
8
5
19 Perseverance Works 38 Kingsland Road London E2 8DD Telephone: +44 020 7749 5950 Fax: 44 020 7729 5388 www.atelierten.com
18
665 3
• •• •••••
89 60
LUMN BASE DETAIL
3000
27
0
LUMN BASE DETAIL
26
187
LUMN BASE DETAIL
31
4246
25
686
LUMN BASE DETAIL
3000
0
LUMN BASE DETAIL
30
3000
686
LUMN BASE DETAIL
29
3000
3
LUMN BASE DETAIL
28
3000
776
LUMN BASE DETAIL
27
3000
8522
MN BASE DETAIL
26
3000
8522
MN BASE DETAIL
25
35
36
37
38
39
+ 2.00 m STREET LEVEL + 0.50 m
Rev
0
Document No. Drawing Title
BIOMEADIG-LSA-ARC-DRWROOF SYSTEM SECTIONS -416 BIOME 1 Drawing Drawn No.
9
___ A416
Scale A0 Drawing Title
1:100
Checked Date
___
________
Approved Status
Rev
0
________
BIOME ROOF SYSTEM SECTIONS - BIOME 1 Drawn
Checked
Approved
10
photographs [above] // construction progress images
11
DOUBLE A G E N C Y The Institutional-Public Threshold and Urban Representation Rice University Master’s Thesis Advisor: Martin Haettasch, Readers: Albert Pope, Sarah Whiting
This thesis formally defines a diagrammatically transparent judicial system as a method of exploiting architecture’s urban agency. Government and judicial institutions are typically architecturalized as either a semantic reading or a monolithic object. This thesis produces an architectural double agency merging the idea of a public object and public space. Double agency creates architectural produce in two distinct capacities: creating a new relationship between the public and the courthouse, and the representation of the formal object in the city. This is addressed using the elements of form, organization, and legibility to reconfigure the relationship. Mies’ courthouse marks a shift in institutional representation from a semantic historical reading to an abstracted slab privileging organization. This thesis proposes a new shift bringing representation back to the table. The relationship between diagram and legibility challenges standard notions of the relationship between public and the courthouse institution, and between architecture and the city.
diagram // public space 12
rendering [above] // front elevation diagram [below] // concept
public object public object public object public space public space public space public visual public visual public visual 13
diagrammatic legibility This abstracted diagram (right) specifies courthouse adjacencies and the three circulation types (public, restricted, and secure). Formal variations within this project exploit this organizational diagram while maintaining necessary adjacencies.
diagram [above] // organizational representation of a courthouse
section [left] // cut through secure areas section [right] // cut through public areas section [opposite] // cut through cores
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
RESTROOMS
LOBBY / WAITING AREA
GRAND JURY
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION LIBRARY STUDY LIBRARY STACKS
RESTROOMS LIBRARY STACKS
RESTROOMS LIBRARY STUDY
LIBRARY / STUDY AREA LIBRARY STACKS
LIBRARY LIBRARY STACKS
LIBRARY SUPPORT
STORAGE
US MARSHALL OFFICE RESTROOMS
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
CAFE
SECURITY / US MARSHALL OFFICE
COURTROOM 1
COURTROOM 2 LOBBY / WAITING AREA OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION LOUNGE / BAR
AUDITORIUM LOBBY
PUBLIC SURFACE
LOBBY / SECURITY ACCESS
14 TO PARKING
TO PARKING
JUDGE’S CHAMBERS
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
RESTROOMS PUBLIC WAITING / COURTROOM ASSEMBLY
COURTROOM
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
LIBRARY
COMPUTER LAB
TRIAL JURY SUITE
RESTROOMS
LIBRARY SUPPORT LIBRARY
COMPUTER LAB
US MARSHALL OFFICE
KITCHEN
US MARSHALL OFFICE CAFE
CENTRAL CELL BLOCK OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
AUDITORIUM LOBBY
PUBLIC SURFACE
TO UNDERGROUND PARKING
TO ADJACENT PARK
15
transparent courthouse Skin conditions change where the form meets the cube. The typically singular pattern is inverted at the edge creating moments of transparency, such as in the courtrooms. This connects court users to the city as well as the city to the judicial process. Section rendering below shows how public space is created by manipulating connections between courtroom and jury rooms.
rendering [left] // night perspective courtroom
judge’s circulation path
judge’s chambers
jury deliberation walk
sectional rendering [above] // section through courtroom, jury deliberation sequence 16
public area
jury meeting room
public services
library stacks
structure
library study rooms
cafe
courtroom waiting area
jury deliberation walk office / administration
public surface entrance
rendering [top] // courtroom perspective rendering [middle] // administration area / jury deliberation walk rendering [bottom] // perp-walk over cafe axon [above] // exploded axonometric diagram
17
READING CLUSTER SUPPORT SERVICES
COMPUTER LAB
GROUP STUDY ROOMS
rendering [above] // perspective view of atrium
UP TO PUBLIC SURFACE
LIBRARY STACKS
READING CLUSTER
UP TO LIBRARY STACKS
GROUP STUDY ROOMS
LIBRARY RECEPTION
STUDY AREA
rendered plan [left] // atrium space and public library plans [opposite] // plans with diagrammatic key
18
VISITOR AREA
TRIAL JURY SUITE 1
TRIAL JURY SUITE 2
U.S. PROBATION OFFICE
PUBLIC ACCESS COURTROOM 3
SECURE CIRC. (PERP WALK)
CENTRAL CELL BLOCK
AUDITORIUM
COURTROOM 4
LOBBY
PUBLIC LOBBY / WAITING AREA
UP TO PUBLIC SURFACE LOBBY
UP TO LOUNGE
DOWN TO ENTRY
PUBLIC LOBBY / WAITING AREA
DOWN TO GROUND lEVEL OPEN TO BELOW
JURY DELIBERATION WALK 1
DOWN TO GROUND lEVEL
JURY DELIBERATION WALK 2
CONFERENCE PIT
DOWN TO LIBRARY
DOWN TO OFFICES
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION
EXTERIOR SEATING AREA UP TO LOUNGE
OFFICE / ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE ROOMS
PUBLIC ACCESS
GRAND JURY
COURTROOM 1
second level
COURTROOM 2
third evel
sixth evel
jury deliberation rooms
cell block
auditorium OUTDOOR CAFE JUDGE CHAMBERS SUITE 2
UNDERGROUND CONNECTION TO TUNNEL SYSTEM
SUPPORT
JUDGE CHAMBERS SUITE 1
public exterior surface
interior entry
public exterior surface
administration / offices
CAFE KITCHEN
administration / offices
OFFICES / WORKROOMS
conference rooms
JUDGE DELIBERATION WALK 2
public entry surface courtrooms
JUDGE DELIBERATION WALK 1 UP TO PUBLIC SURFACE
PUBLIC ACCESS
jury deliberation rooms
PUBLIC ACCESS
support courtrooms
kitchen / cafe
cell block
auditorium
LOBBY / SECURITY CHECK
support
Support Services
computer lab
OUTDOOR CAFE
UP
library study administration / offices public exterior surface
interior entry
public exterior surface
administration / offices
PUBLIC SURFACE
cafe / public space
library stacks
public waiting area / lobby
public waiting area / lobby
administration / offices conference rooms
RESTRICTED ACCESS AND U.S. MARSHALL OFFICES
public entry surface
U.S. Marshall Office
courtrooms
kitchen / cafe
fourth level support
Support Services
ground level
computer lab
restrooms
support
restrooms
restrooms
support courtrooms
library study administration / offices
jury deliberation rooms
cafe / public space
library stacks
public waiting area / lobby
public waiting area / lobby
cell block
auditorium
READING CLUSTER SUPPORT SERVICES
PUBLIC ACCESS
U.S. Marshall Office
restrooms
support
restrooms
grand jury
restrooms
public exterior surface
interior entry
public exterior surface
administration / offices
AUDITORIUM
administration / offices
COMPUTER LAB
conference rooms
LOBBY GROUP STUDY ROOMS
LOBBY
public entry surface courtrooms UP TO LOUNGE
DOWN TO ENTRY
DOWN TO GROUND lEVEL
UP TO PUBLIC SURFACE
OPEN TO BELOW
DOWN TO GROUND lEVEL
support
Support Services
jury deliberation rooms
kitchen / cafe
cell block
auditorium
support courtrooms
LIBRARY STACKS
computer lab
library study
READING CLUSTER
UP TO LIBRARY STACKS
administration / offices
UP TO LOUNGE
public exterior surface
CONFERENCE ROOMS
public exterior surface
interior entry
administration / offices
cafe / public space
library stacks
public waiting area / lobby
public waiting area / lobby
GROUP STUDY ROOMS
administration / offices
PUBLIC ACCESS
conference rooms LIBRARY RECEPTION
STUDY AREA
public entry surface
U.S. Marshall Office
courtrooms
second level
support
Support Services
support
restrooms
restrooms
grand jury
fifth level support
courtrooms
kitchen / cafe
restrooms
computer lab jury deliberation rooms library study administration / offices
library stacks
public waiting area / lobby
public waiting area / lobby
U.S. PROBATION OFFICE
COURTROOM 3
COURTROOM 4
interior entry
public exterior surface
U.S. Marshall Office
cell block
auditorium
cafe / public space
restrooms
support
restrooms
restrooms
public exterior surface
administration / offices
administration / offices
grand jury conference rooms
PUBLIC LOBBY / WAITING AREA
public entry surface courtrooms
PUBLIC LOBBY / WAITING AREA
DOWN TO LIBRARY
jury deliberation rooms
support
Support Services
support courtrooms
DOWN TO OFFICES
cell block
auditorium
kitchen / cafe
computer lab
library study EXTERIOR SEATING AREA
public exterior surface
administration / offices
public exterior surface
interior entry
administration / offices cafe / public space
library stacks
public waiting area / lobby
public waiting area / lobby
administration / offices conference rooms GRAND JURY
public entry surface U.S. Marshall Office
courtrooms
third level
support
Support Services
support courtrooms
kitchen / cafe
restrooms
support
restrooms
restrooms
grand jury
sixth level
computer lab
library study administration / offices
cafe / public space
U.S. Marshall Office
library stacks
restrooms
support
public waiting area / lobby
restrooms
restrooms
public waiting area / lobby
grand jury
model [left] // plexiglass model [1/16” - 1’] model [right] // study model [1/16” - 1’] 19
grand jury
TOWER D 72-Story Tower in NYC Hudson Yards Development w/ Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Rockwell Group Involvement includes: Concept and SD of building base development and interior development, coordination with building systems and adjacent Culture Shed
This 72-story tower, consisting of condominum and rental units, is a part of the Hudson Yards Development, sited between 30th and 31st streets on 11th avenue. The building’s form is defined by a corset at the middle of the tower. The curvature created by the tension of the straps creates a soft flexible appearance of a building formed by glass and steel building. On the ground level, the lobby spans between to blocks, creating a contunious lobby experience between 30th and 31st streets. The materials and organization of the lobby space accentuates the language of the building and continues the play of “soft” and “hard” through the interior.
renderings [left] // exterior renderings with adjacent Culture Shed model [right] // concept model of corset form (image DS+R) 20
21
ONE LOBBY CONCEPT The complex section of the lobby shows two different entrances, on 31st and 30th streets, at different levels. The plan is organized through a ramp that bifurcates the movement through the space while maintaining an architecturally connected space.
A
A
31ST STREET LOBBY PLAN
plan rendering [above] // 31st street level lobby plan section A-A [below] // rendered section through both lobby levels
22
11th AVENUE CURTAIN WALL CONCEPT 11th Avenue facade is conceptualized as an undulating glass wall suggesting a softness to the material reminiscent of the building’s corset. The curved nature of the glass additionally creates a warped vision between interior and exterior.
11th AVE. PERSPECTIVE
11th AVE. PERSPECTIVE - NIGHT VIEW renderings [above] // initial concept renderings for curved glazing wall (day and night) renderings [below] // 31st street lobby entrance from plaza (image DS+R)
23
P TC BC 1414.7 .16 4 .00
15
PRIVATE SOFT
TC BC 1616.6 .17 4 TC BC 1616.8 .52 5
CB
P0L,0 -D 17 .07
Materiality and form of the core wall represent the transition in the space from the public exterior to a more intimate and private interior, and back again. This is created through a weaving of stone and leather materials where the leather bulges out from behind the stone.
HY
0
LP
DN 2
8.4
R
C 2,2W S A 95IT RE SHFIN A TO WE .03
ER
.45
21
CB PL BCTC 2 21 2.45 .87
.75
22
UP
LP PL
.90
24
BCTC 2 23 4.60 .99 PL BCTC 2 26 6.55 .02
.81
26
E
.70
25
diagram [above] // early conceptual diagram of lobby as 3 layers section [below] // rendered section showing the transition to softer material
soft (private)
PL
3"
hard (public)
BCTC 2 20 1.15 .57
C
7'-
hard (public)
BCTC 2 19 0.33 .92
13LIR 5 SR F+T OW 3"
curtainwall
7
D
HY 7'-
screen
0.6
OR ST128 SF
34
stonewall
E@ AG E SS OP PA 0 SL 1:2
E AG
PL 2
OR ST 0 SF
20
6"
GE
IER
NC
CO
1'-
PL
GE
BCTC 1 19 9.67 .34
D E AG
'-
25
A AD EV EL
IT EX CS IT EX
CB
BCTC 1 17 8.19 .86
E/
PL 1
DN =+ EL 3"
SF
7
IC RV
TC BC 1717.3 .03 6
98
R OO TD N OU RDE GA
A OR ST3 SF
SE
PL
17 .5
OR AT EV EL BBY LO
WC
24
PL
PUBLIC HARD
stone
leather
wall section diagram
31ST STREET EAST ELEVATION UNROLLED
mock-ups [top] // “hard to soft” detail mock-ups unrolled elevation [middle] // detail showing transition from stone to leather renderings [bottom] // transition wall from hard to soft (stone to leather) 25
bladders ool for graphic
e
A SCHOO L I N F I V E B L A D D E R S Exploring Learning Space Through Morphological and Typological Variance Critics: Gordon Wittenberg and Dawn Finley (in collaboration w/ David Dahlbom and Rachel Dewane)
A simple topological concept guided the development of this building, both morphologically and programmatically: the difference between the inside and the outside of a closed, orientable surface. This closed surface is referred to as a bladder, its inside condition 2 space, and its outside condition 1 space. Deformations of this bladder were permitted so long as its status as a closed, orientable surface was maintained.
mmunication
ers
Ultimately the deformations applied could be easily communicated with the use of three basic categories: columns (giving the bladder a waist), doughnut holes (holes that do not pierce the surface), and bulges. Using this simple topological concept and these basic deformations, we were able to satisfy a large number of demands with a continuous system. These concepts further demanded a careful reconsideration of learning environments in general, and particularly learning environments in a school devoted to media. Spatially, condition 1 and condition 2 spaces tend toward the creation of significantly different sorts of environments. The arrangements of the various deformation types are used to create a diverse range of affects thus producing interesting and useful spaces for engagement.
condition 1
condition
condition 1 condition 2
condition 1 and condition 2 space: The building is one continuous, closed, orientable surface, and as such possesses a topological “inside” and “outside.” This “inside and outside” does not necessarily correspond to the inside and outside of building as would be casually understood by that expression. In order to avoid confusion, we call the inside space —the space that is, strictly speaking, inside the bladder— condition 2 space, and the space outside and on the bladder condition 1 space. The diagram above labels these two conditions and shows an inverted view to emphasize the fact that condition 2 space is not merely poche space.
inverted view
diagram [top] // spatial condition diagram diagram [bottom] // inverted condition diagram model [right] // formal studies with controlled deformations of PVC
26
condition 1 and condition 2 space: The building is one continuous, closed, orientable surface, and as such p a topological “inside” and “outside.” This “inside and outside” does not necessarily correspond to the inside and of building as would be casually understood by that expression. In order to avoid confusion, we call the inside spa space that is, strictly speaking, inside the bladder— condition 2 space, and the space outside and on the bladder 1 space. The diagram above labels these two conditions and shows an inverted view to emphasize the fact that co space is not merely poche space.
rendering [above] // street view diagram [below] // deformation types
neutral
donut
column
bulge
27
Academy Specific
Student Activities
Condition 2
Open Air Commons
Circulation
Dining Center
Instructional Commons
Reception
Student Activities
Gymnasium
Media Center
Dining Services
Health Center
Restrooms
Specialized Labs
General Classrooms
T.V. Studio
Administration Center
Auditorium
Instructional Commons
Student Activities
Student Activities
Instructional Commons
Instructional Commons
Classrooms
Classrooms
Classrooms
Labs
Labs
Labs
Television and Film Academy
Graphic Arts Academy
Journalism Academy
C O LU M N S
SHELLS
In maintaining the singularity of the surface, columns curve to provide ultimate load-bearing Condition 1forms strength. The resultant create programmed condition 2 spaces.
These large surface deformations create large condition 2 spaces. Loads are dispersed through the structurally powerful shell.
DONUTS
TRUS S
program vignettes
Acting as an “inverted column”, donuts provide structure while allowing for light to enter deep through the building. Direction gymnasium: Here a simple move creates locker rooms, playing floor and condition 1 instructional commons: Here the depression of light wells are designed to belachers. in condition 1 is only accessible from the condition 2 space optimize the amount of natural below. The upper level acts as an observation deck. Below, light in the building. the condition 2 space is used to create an enclosed pod. This would be appropriate for a bathroom or a computer lab.
Formed from a grouping of narrow columns, the truss produces an expansive area for a new learning environment excondition 2 instructional commons: Here the lower pocket in condition 2perience. space is visible from the upper condition 2 space, but not physically accessible. The upper level acts as an observation platform.
circulation vignettes
condition 2 stairs: The strict separation of condition 1 and condition 2 space demands that circulation between floors must stay within the originating condition. Here is an example of condition 2 to condition 2 stairs.
28
condition 1 stairs: The strict separation of condition 1 and condition 2 space demands that circulation between floors must stay within the originating condition. Here is an example of condition 1 to condition 1 stairs through “doughnut” holes.
condition 2 elevator: An elevator must abide by the same rules as the stairs and remain within its originating condition. Here the elevator shaft and mechanical apparatus are hidden within condition 2 space.
exploded axon [left] // schematic surface axon model [above] // various floor levels of printed model 29
B
B
A
A
plan [above] // plan overlay drawing section [below] // section A
30
rendering [opposite, above] // classroom space rendering [opposite, left] // entrance rendering [opposite, middle] // cafeteria rendering [opposite, right] // gymnasium
31
THE S TA C K - D O C K S T FA C ADE DESIGN Facade proposal adjacent to the Brooklyn Bridge in DUMBO, Brooklyn w/ Leeser Architecture Involvement: design, modelling, rendering, detail and elevation drawing, consultant coordination
This competition proposal for a building facade challenges the rigid form that was determined by the local building restrictions. Conceived as a series of stacked boxes, the facade breaks the singularity of the form while reflecting the context of the Brooklyn Bridge back to visitors. I was involved throughout this project from initial concept design to the detailing of the facade system. I worked through the design with various glass, mechanical, and facade consultants.
32
THE STACK
rendering [above] // perspective from the Brooklyn Bridge walkway
33
A
DOCK ST. A
CONDITION 1: ANGLE A
14 BAYS
The design, drawings, specifications, plans & measurements, etc., contained in these documents are solely for use in implementation of the Project identified herein. Irrespective of the ownership of the Documents or any Copyright associated with them, use of these Documents for any purpose other than as expressly authorized, in writing, by the Architect voids the promises, representations and warranties of the Architect, if any, normally associated with the Architect's Professional Services as evidenced by the Architect's Seal. All Rights Are Reserved.
B
issue:
B
CONDITION 2: LENGTH: 14 BAYS ANGLE B
key plan:
22 BAYS
C seal:
C
CONDITION 3: LENGTH: 22 BAYS ANGLE C title:
diagrams [above] // angled facade pieces are minimized to reduce customization
3
STACKS WINDOW SCHEDULE
STACKS DIAGRAM 1/16" = 1'
reflective glass
date:
systemized irregularity The regularity of the building mass is broken up through the angled blocks. These irregularities were designed within a rigid system to minimize the customized parts while achieving the maximum effect.
34
aluminum spandrel
c 2012 LEESER ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
checked by:
scale:
1/8"=1'-0" number:
rendering [above] // detail view of materials and operable windows
Leeser Architecture
20 Jay Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 t 718.643.6656 f 718.643.6945 www.leeser.com
E2 A201
DOCK ST.
The design, drawings, specifications, plans & measurements, etc., contained in these documents are solely for use in implementation of the Project identified herein. Irrespective of the ownership of the Documents or any Copyright associated with them, use of these Documents for any purpose other than as expressly authorized, in writing, by the Architect voids the promises, representations and warranties of the Architect, if any, normally associated with the Architect's Professional Services as evidenced by the Architect's Seal. All Rights Are Reserved. issue:
key plan:
seal:
title:
STACKS_WEST_ELEVATION
date:
c 2012 LEESER ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
checked by:
scale:
1/8"=1'-0" number:
THE THE STACK STACK :: DOCK DOCK ST ST ELEVATION ELEVATION DESIGN PRESENTATION - OCTOBER 06 2011 DESIGN PRESENTATION DOCK STREET - DUMBO - DECEMBER 14 2011 DOCK STREET - DUMBO
1604
rendering [above] // Water St. perspective
rendering [above] // street view from under Brooklyn Bridge 35
mporary Arts Museum onceptual Storyboard
CO N T E M P O R A R Y A R T S M U SEUM Fluctuating Space in Houston Critic: Doug Oliver
This Contemporary Arts Museum proposal explores the possibilities of a highly customizable space and the relationship of the building to its context. Located within Houston’s museum district, the project aims to pull the visitor out of the street context through a series of tunnels. Juxtapositions of program and form create interesting moments as the viewers move through the spaces. Fluctuations in the cast-glass skin allow for light and views that correspond to program within the building while penetrating in at the tunnels connecting the skin as a fluid surface.
Justin Brammer School of Architecture mporary Arts Museum onceptual Storyboard
Approach to building site coming up Bissonnet Street. Site is shown in relation to the dense traffic occuring at the intersection.
Justin Brammer School of Architecture
ense traffic occuring at
Houston Contemporary Arts Museum
Tunnel entrance for cars on Bissonnet side. Opening is punctured in the structure andConceptual pulled throughStoryboard narrowing throughout.
Approach to building site coming up Bissonnet Street. Site is shown in relation to the dense traffic occuring at the intersection.
Tunnel entrance for cars on Bissonnet side. Opening is punctured in the structure and pulled through narrowing throughout.
Tunnel allows for passenger drop-off while continuing to narrow and pull through to a new space.
Tunnel entrance for cars on Bissonnet side. Opening is punctured in the structure and pulled through narrowing throughout.
Approach to building site coming up Bissonnet Street. Site is shown in relation to the dense traffic occuring at the intersection.
Tunnel entrance for cars on Bissonnet side. Opening is punctured in the structure and pulled through narrowing throughout.
Lower ceiling in the entry-way with natural light filtering in to illuminate the admissions desk and surrounding area.
Lower ceiling in the entry-way allows for a greater contrast in the transition to the gallery space.
Material switches from softer to harder material to eventually transition to interior space. Shade from trees creates a cooler space before the walkway slips into a gap in the building.
pace. Shade from trees
Lower ceiling in the entry-way with natural light filtering in to illuminate the admissions desk andStoryboard Conceptual surrounding area.
Lower ceiling in the entry-way allows for a greater contrast in the transition to the gallery space.
face to a softer gravel
Material switches from softer to harder material to eventually transition to interior space. Shade from trees creates a cooler space before the walkway slips into a gap in the building.
Lower ceiling in the entry-way with natural light filtering in to illuminate the admissions desk and surrounding area.
m as a display area.
eel girders to potentially
Tunnel allows for passenger drop-off while continuing to narrow and pull through to a new space.
Justin Brammer Rice University School of Architecture
face to a softer gravel
eel girders to potentially
Tunnel allows for passenger drop-off while continuing to narrow and pull through to a new space.
Tunnel allows for passenger drop-off while continuing to narrow and pull through to a new space.
Houston Contemporary Arts Museum
Lower ceiling in the entry-way allows for a greater contrast in the transition to the gallery space.
Justin Brammer Rice University School of Architecture
New space hidden by the building poses different views. Material change of the surface to a softer gravel further signifying change of space. Material also creates a new audio affect.
Circulation between floors in gallery space can be open and even continue to perform as a display area.
Pathway leading to the auditorium passes over the tunnel entrance for cars.
Circulation between floors in gallery space can be open and even continue to perform as a display area.
NewLong space hiddenspace by the Material change isofmade the surface a softertogravel gallery withbuilding naturalposes light different coming inviews. from up high. Ceiling of steeltogirders potentially further change ofwalls. space. Material also creates a new audio affect. hangsignifying art or temporary
Material switchessite fromcoming softer up to harder material eventually to to interior space.traffic Shade from trees Approach to building Bissonnet Street.toSite is showntransition in relation the dense occuring at creates a cooler space before the walkway slips into a gap in the building. the intersection.
Pathway leading to the auditorium passes over the tunnel entrance for cars.
TunnelLower allows for passenger drop-offallows while for continuing narrow and throughtotothe a new space. ceiling in the entry-way a greatertocontrast in thepull transition gallery space.
Pedestrian exit/entrance to building on Montrose. Pedestrians slip into or out of the building through a gap that leads them to the space in the back. Material change to the soft gravel again creates the sensation of a transition as one enters the new space.
Pedestrian exit/entrance to building on Montrose. Pedestrians slip into or out of the building through a gap that leads them to the space in the back. Material change to the soft gravel again creates the sensation of a transition as one enters the new space.
Pathway leading to the auditorium passes over the tunnel entrance for cars.
Material switches from softer to harder material to eventually transition to interior space. Shade from trees Circulation floors the in gallery space continue to perform as a display area. creates a coolerbetween space before walkway slipscan intobea open gap inand theeven building.
diagram [above] // conceptual sequence diagrams
36
Lower ceilingfor in the withside. natural light filtering in to in illuminate the admissions and Tunnel entrance carsentry-way on Bissonnet Opening is punctured the structure and pulleddesk through surrounding area. narrowing throughout.
Pedestrian exit/entrance to building on Montrose. Pedestrians slip into or out of the building through a gap that leads them to the space in the back. Material change to the soft gravel again creates the sensation of a transition as one enters the new space.
Lower ceilingleading in the entry-way with natural in toentrance illuminate admissions desk and Pathway to the auditorium passeslight overfiltering the tunnel forthe cars. surrounding area.
Lower ceiling exit/entrance in the entry-way allows foronaMontrose. greater contrast in the slip transition theofgallery space.through a gap Pedestrian to building Pedestrians into ortoout the building that leads them to the space in the back. Material change to the soft gravel again creates the sensation of a transition as one enters the new space.
model [above] // model in site context [1/16� = 1’] skin model [below] // cast resin skin study model
37
diagram sequence [above] // series showing relationship of program, mass, and skin 38
rendering [above] // large exhibition space
rendering [below] // atrium and exhibition space 39
GALLERY SPACE
ENTRY
Skin creates an oscillating relationship with interior program, wrapping and guiding the visitor through space
plan 1
40
north elevation
41
D - 33 Installation at P.P.O.W. Gallery - New York, NY. USA, 2012 w/ Sarah Oppenheimer/Folding Enterprises Involvement includes: Fabrication drawing set This installation by Sarah Oppenheimer at P.P.O.W. Gallery in Chelsea (2012) investigates the connections between different spaces, challenging the visitor both physically and visually. Punctures made through the existing gallery walls create circulation and line-of-sight between the rooms producing new connections between spaces and people. Lighting strategies create a visual mosiac through the interventions. My role included producing the fabrication drawing set for the steel structure that is inserted into the voids created in the walls. The project relies on the complex angles and custom metal joints that support the voids.
conceptual drawing [above] // diagram of void interventions
42
photograph [above] // installation view (image courtesy Folding Enterprises) 43
VOID DESIGN AND FABRICATION The complex architectural voids are created, at their most distilled, by the compound joints and integration of materials. Exhibited here are examples of the manifold connections that ultimately produce the desired affect.
44
photographs [opposite, right] // installation view (image courtesy Folding Enterprises) fabrication drawings [opposite] // steel fabrication drawings used for construction 3D model view [top] // snapshot from model, used to derive fabrication drawings detail drawing [bottom left] // markup on steel structure drawing
45
HYP E R D I K E Repurposing Galveston Through Economic and Ecological Infrastructure Critics: Christopher Hight and Michael Robinson (in collaboration w/ Judd Swanson)
Hyperdike addresses Galveston’s economic crisis by guaranteeing the insurability and appreciation of real estate in the area and capitalizing on new modes of shipping traffic. The proposal includes the construction of a dike around the east end of the island connecting both ends of the seawall. Integrated within brownfield sites along the dike are a postPanamax containerized shipping port, various attractions and parks, wetland growth areas, beaches, and a raised urban infrastructure that revitalizes the bay-side waterfront. The dike will be primarily built using material displaced from the dredging of the new post-Panamax deep channel. The container port draws from the massive flow of goods through the Houston/East Texas area effectively redirecting the flow of containerized shipping from the Houston Ship Channel to the new Galveston port. Voids created between the shipping dock and the shore create programmatic opportunities for differentiated programs combining brownfield redevelopment, ballast water remediation, and dredge fill. These programs include a wetlands, park space, concert venue, floating casino, amusement park, and a public aquarium.
46
post-ikeofstatus overview post-ike conditions post-ike status west end west end
east end east end
the west end is characterized by a comparatively rich state of biodiversity and a high level of geomorphological instability. the west end is characterized by a comparatively rich state biodiversity ike andhas a high level of geomorphological instability. these factors render further development both damaging andofdangerous. underscored the futility of the traditional these factors model render when furtherapplied development both damaging and dangerous. ike has the futility the traditional development to conditions such as this. the tax revenue that underscored would be generated by of further development development model when applied to conditions such as this. the tax revenue that would be generated by further development of the west end, crucial to the economic survival of the city, must be offset by a new source. of the west end, crucial to the economic survival of the city, must be offset by a new source.
low damage and low levels of biodiversity make low east damage and low of biodiversity make the end ideal for levels continued development. the the east for acontinued development. east endend alsoideal boasts fair a mount of existing,the east end also boasts a fair a mount of existing, under-utilized transportation infrastructure. under-utilized transportation infrastructure.
massive damage level of biodiversity level of biodiversity
biodiversity of the gulf decreases at the sea wall biodiversity of the gulf decreases at the sea wall
rendering [above] // aerial perspective of housing incorporated into the levee map [left] // map showing 50 year storm damage to Galveston Island
minimal damage
47
industrial connectivity
high
low
why not galveston? port uses and capacities
In effect, logistics experts operate on the principle that capital not in motion ceases to be capital. They look at ships as floating warehouses. Ideally, there should be no point, from production to final sale, when goods sit around waiting for further processing. The flow from sale to ordering to production to shipping to the next sale should occur in one smooth motion. This is the idea behind the logistics revolution.
the logistical economy f p = connectivity value at given point n = number of attractors in field
n
i re-purposing galveston area infrastructure for the post-oil era fi = attractive force of i-th attractor p= ki d = distance between i-th attractor and p i=0
di
i
ki = drop-off constant for i-th attractor
Edna Bonacich and Jake Wilson, Getting the Goods (2007) - port - refinery
ratio of loading/unloading capacity to available storage
map [top] // grasshopper surface showing industrial connectivity in the region map [bottom] // overlay of refinery locations on the connectivity map
beaumont
houston
port arthur
250 / 266,218
1500 / 2,631,000
80 / 418,000
freeport 60 / 480,000
galveston 40 / 345,000
Sources: Port Efficiency data derived from Union Pacific Rail Road website (http://www.uprr. com/customers/ind-prod/ports/index.shtml).
tonnage distribution network
tapping in in this drawing the information from the ‘tonnage distribution over transportation modalities’ diagram is mapped onto the upper texas coast. this should be viewed as a section cut from a larger, continuous circuit of global exchange. note that of the enormous amount of goods and materials that circulate through the area (460 million tons in 2006), only the tiniest portion circulates through galveston. this represents a great loss in terms of potential job creation and revenue from port leasing, and dockage and wharfage fees. it is our suggestion that if galveston tools itself up for handling a greater portion of this flow, and specifically if it does so with an eye to the anticipated changes in the type of goods that will be circulating in the near future, the city will secure for itself a financially viable future.
Ports Shipping/Highwa Railroads
48
diagram [left, top] // ratio of loading/unloading capacity to available storage diagram [left] // flow of goods from shipping, rail, and highway infrastructures axon [above] // proposed container port incorporating public program
pro pos ed dike
e x is ti n
a g seaw
dike circuit is completed
ll
dike reacts to local site conditions
forms effect local ecologies
section a - wetland remediation and park
section b - container port and event space
section c - housing infrastructure and marina
section d - cruise terminal and park space
section e - housing infrastructure and boardwalk
section f - topographic beach and dunes
b
c a
a b c
e f d e
f
d
49
levee variations
Container Port Dock Integrated Levee
Shipping Container Lots on Levee
dike
infrastructure development
Berm creating using dredged material from shipping channel connects the two ends of the seawall and shores up the city against hurricanes, heavy surges, and sea level rise.
Development on the infrastructure is guided by the offsets from the shoreline, roadways, and connections to the program under the new “datum� created by the dike.
Earthen Levee on Interior of Island
Earthen Levee on Perimiter of Island
Highway and Traffic Systems on Levee
levee variations
Container Port Dock Integrated Levee
Earthen Levee Minimum Distance Barrier
Shipping Container Lots on Levee
Earthen Levee Reinforced with Corrugated Metal Wall (Program Exposed)
Earthen Levee on Interior of Island
Earthen Levee Reinforced with Corrugated Metal Wall
Earthen Levee on Perimiter of Island
Concrete Wall Levee
Highway and Traffic Systems on Levee
Offets Byou Lock System
diagram [above] // various levee typologies
lower program Open area within the dike infrastructure creates space for development and parking. temporary business as well as public programmatic elements exist along the periphery of the marina where they are susceptible to storm damage.
50
park topography Gently sloping topography mediates the divisive nature of the dike. variances in park topography designate programmatic use. High areas become walkways, slopes are zones of channeling along the water is a boardwalk, in between the delaminating surface is athletic fields and recreation area, and closest to the dike is an industrial park/landscape.
rendering [above] // view of housing infrastructure and marina
51
PIE R 1 - B R O O K LY N B R I D G E PARK COMPETITION Condominium and Hotel Development on the Brooklyn Waterfront w/ Leeser Architecture Involvement: conceptual design, 3D modelling (Rhino), drawings, and renderings.
The main drive of this proposal was to integrate the building into the park by extending the green surface of the landscape up through the structure. Organizationally, the building acts as two single-loaded corridor slabs with a park/atrium space between. The blocks of form are torqued to reveal moments of public program (restaurants, pavilions). Additional public amenities are suspended within the atrium space to create a unique living environment that supports the public nature of the site. My involvement on this two-week competition proposal includes working with the team on the conceptual design, 3D modelling, drawings and diagrams, and renderings.
rendered section [above, left] // section through atrium
52 BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK
rendering [above] // perspective from Brooklyn Bridge diagrams [below] // series showing relationship of building to the park
53
rendering [above] // entrance view of atrium and park
at residential ATRIUM atrium AT RESIDENTIAL LEVELlevel
54
rendering [above] // street view
glass roof hotelLEVEL level GLASS ROOF ATat HOTEL
hotel GYM gymAND andPOOL pool HOTEL
building as park The surface of the park is lifted up through the building to integrate the form into the context.
55
A TREE GROWS IN HOUSTON Hybrid Typologies and Housing Infrastructure in Houston’s Fifth Ward Critic: Albert Pope
Trees in this housing project refer not to lush carbon-dioxide absorbing plants, but rather to a diagrammatic representation of the relationship between housing and infrastructure. Hierarchical analysis of housing in Houston’s Fifth Ward results in an abstracted categorization of existing typologies as trees - lowlying connections with little degree of separation from the more complex infrastructure system. The monotonous and limited hierarchical condition suggests a strategy of typological diversity as a method of urban integration. This project integrates the buildings into the larger urban infrastructure, reclaims the green void caused by the defunct railway, connects open transportation nodes through formal intervention providing housing and shared amenities, and fosters urban interaction at a human level through the deployment of various housing typologies and complex circulation overlays. The standardized grid layout is disintegrated in the chosen site. This results in three types of connections defined here as DEAD END, LOOP, and THROUGH streets. These connection types are utilized as nodes from which more complicated typologies and hierarchical arrangements grow. Dead End connections comprise the most numerous node type within the site. The openness of this type allows for direct circulatory connection into a more complex system. Loop connections tap into the urban hierarchical circuit at points of continuous movement. This typology lends toward organizations with fewer degrees of separation such as point-loaded buildings. The through street typology branches from both sides of the street creating a building spanning the roadway. Increased density is common within this typology. This project integrates the buildings into the larger urban infrastructure, reclaims the green void caused by the defunct railway, connects open transportation nodes through formal intervention providing housing and shared amenities, and fosters urban interaction at a human level through the deployment of various housing typologies and complex circulation overlays.
56
ROADWAY PARKING VERTICAL CIRCULATION UNITS
COMMON AREAS
UNITS
SMALL BUILDINGS
UNITS
OADWAY
COMMON AREAS
rendering [above] // overview of housing infrastructure diagrams [below] // various hybrid housing typologies
57
DEAD END
DEAD END
DEAD END
LOOP
LOOP
LOOP
THROUGH
THROUGH
THROUGH [ tree grows ]
[ 18 ]
site
connection types
[ tree grows ]
[ 18 ]
Three types of connectors between housing and infrastructure produce complex variations branch from these starting nodes. Housing in this project builds from the hybrid typology analy[ tree grows ] [ 18 ] sis relating the unit to infrastructure. Variations in types are based on unit density and connection type within the larger infrastructure.
58
infrastructure
connection nodes
site plan [left] // abstracted representation of site infrastructure
30’
’
x 50
35’
’
x 35
units aggregated on the horizontal datum
horizontal aggregation The raised platform creates horizontal common ground and circulation onto which units aggregate.
’05
’53
x ’0
3
x ’5
3
walkway between skip-stop corridors
vertical aggregation The vertical datum acts as an organizer for the stacked units and a sign of the building’s typology. 59
In this abstracted diagram units are represented by the white dots at the end of a connection series. Degrees of separation making up this series vary from hallways to greenspace to skip-stop corridors. The thick white line running throughout indicates the projects datum that connects through form and at certain moments through space. This privileging of space produces the “soft-megastructure�.
60
soft-megastructure
relative unit densities
footprint
axon [above] // building density strategy site [below] // full building footprint spans one mile in length
61
SOW WA H C E N T R A L Interactive space and pavilion w/ LAB @ Rockwell Group Involvement: Design, concept, and presentation Sowwah Central is a public space with interactive features, a central funicular, and patterned roof structure, all situated in shopping center in Abu Dhabi, UAE. This proposal called for intense design charette and production, moving from the conceptual sketches below to the renderings on the following pages, in only 3 days time. The project calls on the triangular and overlapping patterns of middle eastern culture and integrates interactive platforms that respond to touch the sequence of the funicular and to people’s interaction. At the top of the funicular, above the roof structure, is a viewing platform with views to across the metropolis. Interactive glass walls allow users to access information about the city.
sketches [above] // initial concept sketches by LAB team rendering [opposite] // ground floor view (rendered by Viktor Ramos)
62
63
FACADE
A DIGITAL PLATFORM A digital platform overlaid with a physical skin that creates a dimensional, updatable, interactive surface Facade is a beacon for the activity within, and encourages interaction at the human-scale between the mall and visitors Content can change seasonally, monthly, weekly, hourly
Ripples Eect: architectural elements such as the funicular trigger a graphical change on the facade 64
Interactive Surfaces: surface respond to people’s interaction
rendering [above, left] // triangulated platform design (rendered by Viktor Ramos) rendering [above, right] // rooftop and lookout view (rendered by Viktor Ramos)
Facade: updatable responsive platform
rendering [above] // view from rooftop funicular looking at the central space (rendered by Viktor Ramos)
65
ADA P T I V E F O L D I N G S T R U C TURAL SKINS Parametric Folding Structures w/ Smartgeometry @ Bartlett School, UCL Involvement: Concept, design, analysis and fabrication
The following two projects were completed during a week-long design intensive at the Smartgeometry conference in London. The conference aims to bridge the gap between smart parametric form and fabrication. My particular cluster titled “Adaptive Structural Skins� investigates the potentials of folding algorithms to produce structural building envelopes. The project workflow involves conceptual testing (paper folding), parametric modelling, engineering analysis, re-design, and fabrication.
Adaptive Structural Skins
final prototype
structural diagram 66
study models
flat surface-0
study models
study models
unrolled elevation
flat surface-01
67
structural diagram
stress analysis
robofold robotic folding system [above] // example of grasshopper/kangaroo script used to simulate folding
68
study models
unfolded diagram
folding algorithm
69
the new natural in collaboration w/ Tracy Bremer originally published in PLAT Journal 1.0 and Cite Magazine Issue 85 Following the industrial revolution, our environment has been so fundamentally altered that it has resulted in an ambiguity between the natural and artificial. Once considered invasive, the industrial object has become so entrenched in the landscape that it appears as a native element. Within contemporary cities it is now the natural that reveals itself as an impostor resulting with the manufactured environment as the new natural. 70
71
72
73
Contact Info: p: 937 430 5926 e: justinbrammer@gmail.com
Š 2014, Justin Brammer
74