Project Senso by Kawthar Kordia

Kawthar Kordia.

ARC30001 Sem 1 2020 Swinburne Univerist y Unit Convenor: Dr. Mehrnoush Latifi Studio Leaders: Dr. Mehrnoush Latifi and Dr. Sascha Bohnenberger - Fehr

Form Finding to Form Making

Waterfront Development

From Finding/Form Making Micro System

Victoria Harbour, Past, Present and Future

Iterations and Possible Variations

Precedent Studies

Ideation and Speculative Design

Reflection Design Proposal

Reflection

Design Proposal, Keywords and Themes

Master Plan

Contents.

Concept Design

Project Proposal

Development of Physical Language and Gesture

Final Design and Conclusion

Detailed Design

This Project is in Collaboration with Parisa Bazargani Nicole Farnell Irina Tepavcevic Kate Dustan They will be credited underneath images or pages that have their work.

Form Finding to Form Making. A1 A2 A3 A4

From Finding/Form Making Micro System Iterations and Possible Variations Ideation and Speculative Design Reflection

From Finding/Form Making Micro System.

Photograph by Nicole Farnell.

Form Finding Machine This box will support anchor points of our chain meshes to create various iterations at different heights and widths. The digital file of the box was designed to slot together so that its assembly is easy and flexible to work with. The sides of the box can be added or removed depending on the desired support needed for the chain meshes. The file was used for the laser cutting machine.

Machine created by Kawthar Kordia

Photograph by Nicole Farnell.

Chain Assemble Each member of the group explored a different chain mesh to experiment with to produce different iterations through different shapes, weights and densities. These images display the process of creating chain 1 3 4.

Chain 1 Chain created by Kawthar

Chain 3 Chain created by Nicole

Chain 4 * Chain 2 does not need to be as-

sembled as it experiments with single chains. This will be displayed in section A2

Chain created by Parisa

Chain Assemble These images display the process of creating chain 5 6 7 8.

Chain 5 Chain created by Kate

Chain 6,7,8 Chain created by Irina

Machine + Chain These images demonstrate how the machine will be used to support the anchors of the chains.

Photographs by Parisa Bazargani

Iterations and Possible Variations.

2D Iterations Chain 1 explores a chain mesh with a circular void that extends to create a square mesh. These two dimensional iterations create organic shapes in between the empty spaces.

Chain 1 Iteration 2D Chain created by Kawthar

2D Iterations Chain 2 explores individual chains that don not connect Chain 3 explores a grid within a rectangular grid.

Chain 2 Iteration 2D Chain created by Nicole

Chain 3 Iteration 2D Chain created by Nicole

2D Iterations Chain 4 explores a square grid. Chain 5 combines 10mm jump rings in a linking pattern to create a square shape. By pinching and rotating the mesh different shapes are created.

Chain 4 Iteration 2D Chain created by Parisa

Chain 6 explores a square grid at a different density and weight from chain 4.

Chain 5 Iteration 2D Chain created by Kate

Chain 6 Iteration 2D Chain created by Irina

2D Iterations Chain 7 explores paper clips to create a chain-like rectangular shape. Two separate triangles are created and arranged in different positions to create new shapes. Chain 8 explored the same method as chain 5 and uses jump rings but creates rectangles that connects to a single ring

Chain 7 Iteration 2D Chain created by Irina

Chain 8 Iteration 2D Chain created by Irina

3D Iterations 3D Iterations allow chains to work with gravity to create new forms. The anchor points can be positioned in different heights and proximity to create new meshes that are ultimately pulled down because of the force of gravity depending on the chains weight. This also means that if these forms are rotated by 360 degrees, itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s form creates creates an arch that can be enginercally supported.

Chain 1 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4 Chain created by Kawthar

3D Iterations Chain 1 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 3 Chain created by Kawthar

Chain 2 Iteration 3D Anchor Points + Chain created by Nicole

3D Iterations Chain 3 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4-5 Chain created by Nicole

Chain 4 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4 Chain created by Parisa

3D Iterations Chain 5 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4-5 Chain created by Kate

3D Iterations Chain 6 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4-5 Chain created by Irina

Chain 7 Iteration 3D Anchor Points 4-5 Chain created by Irina

A2 Chain 6 | Iteration 3D | Anchor Points 4 | Chain created by Irina

Digital Iterations

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Digital Iterations This study continues the form finding process through digital modeling. Measurements variables within Grasshoppers Kangaroo, provide iterations in which develop structures to be considered for their force and aesthetic qualities. The following legend represents the measuring abbreviations.

V V Count EL Edge Length ES Edge Strength S Strength

Form 1 Iteration Digital

Top

Chain created by Parisa

Front

V 20 EL 1 ES 2000 S 200

V 20 EL 0.8 ES 1000 S 200

V 20 EL 1 ES 1000 S 500

V 20 EL 0.5 ES 500 S 250

V 20 EL 1 ES 1500 S 1000

V 20 EL 0.8 ES 1500 S 1000

Digital Iterations The forms are developed within a boundary of 400 by 400cm in order to quantify the form generating process with varying structural elements. Link 3a, develops a form through eight anchor points with variant 2 providing a central point of support. Link 3b provides nine support points at ground level.

V V Count EL Edge Length ES Edge Strength S Strength

Form 2 Anchor Points 8-9 Iteration Digital

Top

Chain created by Parisa

Front

V 20 EL 0.4 ES 2000 S 2000

V 22 EL 1 ES 2200 S 220

V 20 EL 0.8 ES 1500 S 1000

V 20 EL 1 ES 1000 S 3000

V 20 EL 0.8 ES 1500 S 1000

Digital Iterations Form 3 and 4 explores solid rectangular forms using four anchor points rather then the complex chain design.

Form 3 Anchor Points 4 Iteration Digital Chain created by Nicole

B B C

Form 4 Anchor Points 4 Iteration Digital

A B

Using digital abstract meshes provide further design iterations but lacks the impact of gravity that a physical chain would.

Chain created by Kate D

C D

A B

B C

C B

D C

A C

B A

C D

Digital Iterations Form 5 explores and further developed Chain 1 in a simpler form by using a solid rectangular shape with a circular void using four anchor points.

Form 5 Anchor Points 4 Iteration Digital Chain created by Kawthar

Using digital abstract meshes provide further design iterations but lacks the impact of gravity that a physical chain would.

Digital Iterations Form 6 explored a simple rectangular form with five anchor points. Form 7 explored the relation between each separate chain that works together to form a rectangular mesh. The individual chains remain linear, but can produce forms that twist.

Form 6 Anchor Points 5 Iteration Digital

Chain created by Nicole

Form 7 Anchor Points 4 Iteration Digital *

Using digital abstract meshes provide further design iterations but lacks the impact of gravity that a physical chain would.

Chain created by Nicole

B A

D C

B E

D D C

E D

B B

A D

C D C D

Digital Iterations Form 8 explored 12 anchor points in a hexagon form where the heights are altered to create new forms. The first row displays the top view while the second row displays the front view. The anchor points are organised by colour coordinated points to make it easier to make connections between the top and front view. A B C D E F G H I J K L

Using digital abstract meshes provide further design iterations but lacks the impact of gravity that a physical chain would.

Form 8 Anchor Points 12 Iteration Digital

Top

Chain created by Irina

Front

Ideation and Speculative Design.

Image by Kawthar Kordia

Ideation + Speculative Design Visualisation Drawings I looked at each members chain and began to generate forms inspired by the 3D physical chains that we generated.

Ideation + Speculative Design Proposal 1

This design is inspired by iterations of the the physical forms of Chain 1 in 3D. It merges the forms to create a structure that uses the void to create a space for the boats to enter. This could be a concept used for a boat terminal. The reason this structure was designed was to create an additional way of public transport via the river. This will encourage people to take a trip to docklands to experience the views of the city.

Ideation + Speculative Design Proposal 2

I was inspired by the organic 2D shapes of Chain 1. The harmonious outline reminds me of the water waves. In this diagram, I explore the concept of using the outline of these iterations as a zoning/ floor plan outline. Step 1 The outline of the chain can be formed to create a floor plan/ zoning. This organically shaped plan which follows the waves/curves of the water flow. Step 2 Minimising the amount of lines to create more spaces for each zone. Step 3 The spaces are divided to create a space for five zones. Step 4 An opening is created so that it allows boats to enter the building for a terminal. Step 5 + 6 Zoning/Functions include:

Ideation + Speculative Design Hybrid Proposal

These diagrams illustrate three hybrid proposals. Each one explore different zoning arrangement as each design from different members of the group. All designs looked at different functions.

Page Credit All Group Members

Reflection. Working with chains has been a challenge, yet interesting to explore. Each member has created their own chain and they all differ in dimension, density and pattern. Having a variety of different chains to experiment with inspired and promoted different design proposals in the ideation stage. My favourite thing about working with chains was allowing gravity to influence our forms. We simply change the anchor points and leave the overall form for gravity to shape. This method allows us to create forms with structures that can be self-sustaining according to physics. Some difficulties we had was to create new digital iterations which lacked the impact of gravity. The physical chains was easier to work with in this aspect. Our chains have created multitude and diverse designs which has inspired us to create structures that interact with the waterfront. Creating a structure that interacts with the water as we did in part A3 would make a successful project to respond to the brief.

Waterfront Development. B1 B2 B3 B4 B4

Victoria Harbour, Past, Present and Future Precedent Studies Reflection Design Proposal Design Proposal, Keywords and Themes Master Plan

Victoria Harbour, Past, Present and Future.

Photograph by Kawthar Kordia

About Docklands Docklands is a modern harbour development dominated by high-rises and the colourful Melbourne Star Observation Wheel, and popular for its shopping and waterside dining. The area’s pedestrian plazas are adorned with public murals, sculpture and light displays. Families head to concerts and sports at Marvel Stadium, and to Harbour Town’s mini-golf and sports car simulators. Docklands became part of the City of Melbourne district in July 2007. The suburb’s 200 hectares of land and water are on Victoria Harbour, west of the city centre. From the 1880s, the former swamp west of Melbourne became heavily used as a dock, with an extensive network of wharfs, heavy rail infrastructure and light industry. However, following the containerisation of shipping traffic it fell into disuse and by the 1990s was virtually abandoned.

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic & Parisa Bazargani

Site Visit Sunday, 8th March 2020 5:50- 8:00 PM My site visit was with my family. This became a family day and I was interested to gain their perspective on the site. We drove to Docklands which was a decent trip. We struggled to find somewhere to park to enter the North Wharf. The site felt gloomy and negative as it was heavy in industrial elements such as fences, walls that were graffitied on, cranes that were viewed from the landscape, concrete and asphalt covered the whole land. It was windy and colder then other spaces that did not look out to the water which made some of my family members uncomfortable. My family did not want to stay any longer after Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve captured some images and took notes. We drove to the other side next where the Melbourne Star Observation wheel and restaurants are and i could instantly observe that my family was more positive and enjoyed spending time there (mainly for eating dinner near the peer) It was full of life as there were families and children playing and running in play areas. Overall I could see docklands from two perspectives; an empty, gloomy industrial space and a more family oriented engaging space.

History Past, Present and Future Victoria Harbour is one of Melbourne’s

most significant waterfront areas and “largest urban renewal projects”. It is situated within the Docklands suburb which is divided into eight seperating “precincts”. Containing mixed-use, residential, commerical, dining, retail and leisurely spaces. The definitive site for this case study is a block of land in North Wharf road next to the Docklands Library. Placed alongside the Yarra river, the site provides a distinct set of challenges and opportunities as one of the cities main water edge destination for visitors and locals. According to “The Docklands Public Realm Plan” these include the application of the following design principles “Diversity of use, Identity of place, Sustainability, Interfaces, Amenity, Community and Connectivity” to its public spaces and streets. The planning direction for the precincts are categorised into three main themes “Capturing the essence of Melbourne in the Docklands experience, creating a 21st century city and embracing Melbourne’s urban waterfront.” Defining the collective vision of all land developments and proposals within this shared scheme. Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020. Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Key landmarks surrounding the site include the Marvel ‘Docklands’ Stadium and waterfront, Melbourne Star Observation Wheel, The District Docklands, Docklands Park and the Bolte bridge. With further development scheduled, the suburb is largely currently considered “soulless” due to its vast industrial land and open spaces. Docklands Waterways Strategic Plan, 2009-2018

Docklands indigenous history is part of the

“Lower Yarra Delta” in which was originally “a wetland area containing swamps, low-lying vegetation, waterfowl and fish. For thousands of years, this marshy land between the mouths of the Yarra and Maribyrnong River was used as a hunting ground and meeting place by several Aboriginal communities.” With European Settlement commencing in 1803, the areas central and water front location provided key access to boats with the dock and surrounding area distinguished as an industrial destination by 1860. Development Victoria, 2020. The Victoria Dock’s construction was completed in 1892 and was “handling an estimated 90 per cent of Victoria’s imports.” With cargo requirements changing, “new docks and transport infrastructure were built west of Victoria Dock in the 1970s”

declining the use of the port operations. This led the redevelopment initiatative titled “Docklands Strategy” in 1991 with an estimated completion date of 2025. Development Victoria, 2020. The future of the area is largely aimed at the development of a community based social environment where “liveability is a priority, made possible by quality community infrastructure, welcoming open spaces, interactive street frontages and a vibrant waterfront destination for recreation and leisure.” Docklands Community And Place Plan, 2020. This also entails planning schemes in which “encourages maximising vistas to the water and the city skyline, particularly from key pedestrian spaces.” Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020. These initiatives connect the local environment to the community and people in which will visit the precincts. Providing multi use recreational opportunities for visitors and travellers within the city.

Past, Central City West Context,1892

Present, Suburbs and Postcodes Map

Future, Impression of Docklands, 2022

West Melbourne Dock,1892, David Syme & Co.

Aerial view of Victoria Dock, 1927

Docklands view,1998

Docklands, 2017

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

History Past, Present and Future The Victoria Harbour location provides

urban waterfront spaces within Melbourne “the capital city of Victoria and Australia’s second-largest city.” It is also home to “the headquarters of many local, national and international companies, peak bodies, and government and non-government agencies.” “Docklands became part of the City of Melbourne municipality in July 2007. The suburb’s 200 hectares of land and water are on Victoria Harbour, west of the city centre.” City of Melbourne, 2020. The inclusion of Docklands as part of Melbourne’s Central Business District “doubled the size of Melbourne’s central city and returned a significant area of waterfront to the city. By 2031 Docklands is planned to be a residential area for over 22,000 people, attract 20 millions visitors each year and be a workplace for 50,000 people when completed.” City of Melbourne, 2020. This increase, heightens the importance of a qualitative design approach within the suburbs urban areas as a key area within the city structure. Victoria Harbour’s waterfront spaces are to be developed strategically in order to enhance the value within the suburb as a vibrant precinct. These include “three memorable waterfronts for Melbourne, a network Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

of diverse public spaces for many people and seamless connection with Melbourne: promenades, streets, lanes”. Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020. This initiative incorporates its waterfront edge as a source of inspiration through the creation of memorable spaces, it also increases the level of activity within the suburbs whilst enhancing the route and location accessibility to the site for visitors.

The industrial history of the site is currently

apparent within the Dockland suburb. Upon visiting the selected site the post-industrial landscape contrasts from the developed urban public infrastructure. The blocks of lands further divide and seclude the suburb from its neighboring areas as a welcoming space for recreational purposes. This is further enhanced by the “high rise buildings (9 storeys or above)” in which impacts the built form within the public realm. Docklands Public Realm, 2020. The CBD location provides reduced vehicle access and public trams, rail and boatways as modes of transport. This also increases the walking distances between varying spaces, creating a disconnection from one space to the other. Further initiatives aim to implement strategies in which will connect each precinct within its surrounding areas.

These include further pedestrian links, bridges and cycling routes that will reduce the walking distance and provide ease of access between spaces. Docklands Public Realm, 2020. The structural elements present within the space, provide further insight in to the sites connection to its surrounding suburbs. Concrete and glass are found to be the key materials within the tall buildings. This provides a reduction in visual comfort, how ever is complimented through green zones located within varying spaces surrounding the Dockland’s precinct.

Victoria Harbour, Docklands 2020

North Wharf Road, Docklands 2020

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

History Past, Present and Future The Victoria Harbour’s waterfront

infrastructure includes “privatised boat ownership.” This system negatively impacts the harbours urban value due to a reduction in public usage. Further water access may improve the community connection through a decrease in travel time by incorporating “water transport services”, to increase the “activity” within the precinct. Together with improvements to the “public infrastructure” to support incoming visitors. Melbourne Docklands, 2009-2018. The current water “quality is poor”, with the potential harm to residential areas arising from increased “commercial boating areas”. Providing “buffer zones, better management of stormwater, bilge and waste discharge” may assist in creating a sustainable eco-system within the harbour. With accessability improved with the “provision of ferry and water shuttle services, linking to the CBD” and increasing the “leisure and event berthing”. Melbourne Docklands, 2009-2018. The areas pre-settlement history as a wetland area is noted in 1803 as including large “swamps” and “a blue saltwater lagoon”. Together with a variety of wildlife of “1,000 quails, swans, ducks, geese etc.” The areas evolution into an industrial site in the “late 80’s” provided “drainage systems” and Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

transportation to the site. Sarah Matthews, 2016. This shared history provides insight in to the site management today. With “heritage” listings maintaining the industrial sites landscape and charachter together with “opportunitys to increase biodiversity” and “diversifying vegetation populations to enhance habitat for birdlife, wildlife, insect populations and other biological species of high conservation value.” Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020.

Future development of the site aims to

improve its waterfront edge, enhance the community aspect of the Dockland’s precinct and create a multi-use, multi-seasonal urban precinct in which respects the water infrastructure and natural surroundings. The city of Melbourne’s climate and global changes in weather, require key strategies in further reducing the areas environmental impact through sustainable measurements in design. Current vegetation within the precincts include “around 3,000 trees” together with “civic and local parks.” With an ongoing aim to introduce further green spaces and “improve comfort and convenience.” Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020. Upon visiting the harborside the provision of green spaces to the existing promenade may greatly improve

the overall aesthetic and feel. The design of which requires structures in which are designed whilst considering the rising sea level changes and climatic developments. The Docklands Public Realm Plan, describes key design considerations of the Docklands precinct for its waterfront edge in the implementation of “Water sensitive urban design” including “drought and flood management, passive tree watering, bioretention systems (raingardens and tree pits), wetlands and stormwater storage and reuse systems.” This also includes providing shielded locations from prevailing winds. The future design challenges within the Docklands waterfront location, presents the opportunity to propose the harborside edge as a leading sustainable and recreational realm within urban design. With the selected site aimed at creating a “water activation opportunity.” Docklands Public Realm Plan, 2020.

Port Philip Map, 1803

Map of Docklands, 1945

Map of Docklands, ,2020

Victoria Harbour, Docklands Waterways

Yarra River, Docklands Waterways

Moonee Ponds Creek, Docklands Waterways

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

History Past, Present and Future The site visit to Docklands provides key

Upon arrival at Victoria Harbour, the pre-

· High rise buildings with glass facades · Mixed-use and residential buildings · Use of concrete to infrastructure · Positioning of green landscapes · River water quality variants · Contrasting shaded and unshaded areas · Industrial and re-developed sites

· Further recreational services to waterfront edge · Variety of harbourside food and leisurely activities · Improved modes of pedestrian access · Improved modes of water transportation · Waterfront activities opportunity · Increased green spaces · Increased seating and shading spaces

insights into the suburbs public areas and urban developments. The key surrounding spaces include the Bolte Bridge which may be accessed from South Wharf and is an average 15-20 minutes walking distance to North Wharf Road by the Victoria Harbourside waterfront. The main connecting road is the CBD’S Collins Street, with pedestrian access throughout. Trams also run within this area and are mainly linked to the city’s fringe. The corporate headquarters within Collins Street through to the site location presents contrasting elements, these include:

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

cinct is distinguished by a city landscape and waterfront pier. This is mainly categorised by the docks, ports and boats in which are positioned along its edges. Toward the selected site study, large blocks of land contrast to the existing re-developed urban structures. The pavements also contrast within short distances to each other. The Dock library and residential properties provide a community aspect to this area. The main aspects to consider for further development may include:

Yarra River, Docklands

Bolte Bridge, Docklands

Victoria Harbour, Docklands

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

History The following map displays the“Sensory” qualities within the Dockland precinct and The Victoria Harbourside. The history and qualitative measures are reflected upon visiting the site in March, 2020. The survey is considered within the key time lines in which the land has been developed. In the early 1800’s the now titled Dockland area, was covered in “wetlands” in which spanned across a large suburban frame along the Yarra river. An exception of this area titled “Batman’s Hill” situated to the “north of the river bank” was the position of initial redevelopment. Early planning and development of the lagoon areas commenced in the late 1800’s, completing construction in late 1900’s for the districts industrial infrastructure. With heritage listed buildings and sites present today in the suburban frame of Docklands. Victorian Places, 2015. The late 1900 - 2000 era has seen the development of the suburb into a corporate and leisurely neighborhood. Glimpses of a post-industrial landscape, are visually present, with considered design approaches to create the spaces anew. Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

The city backdrop, is visible within the Victoria Harbour’s edge, providing an artistic landscape. This is combined with the placement of trees, drawing in soft wildlife such as birds and butterfly’s. The audible aspects are primarily of water transportation, cars and people. With certain sounds quietening closer to the waterfront. This provides a silent atmosphere, which is contrasted with the tactile aspects of the site. These include concrete finishes, metal detailing and glass facades in which reflect the surrounding spaces.

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Context

Neighborhood Context + Existing Buildings

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Context

Neighborhood Context + Existing Buildings

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Human Culture Our docklands pier has a fairly diverse category when it comes to its community and the culture surrounding it. The pier is segregated into two main parts. Its family friendly environment, with residential apartments and its business quarters scattered around Docklands perimeters. Although it may seem a bit segregated based on where the other half is located, the docks fundamentally brings everyone together with these linking spaces such as parks, restaurants, calming views overlooking the docks, sporting stadiums and most importantly its boats where you see people of all ages and race, congregate. These spaces have found people go by their days and start to make a routine for themselves, whether working and going out for lunch, or living in the area and going for a walk around its docks. The community have their own unique duties for their every day lives. Not only over the weekdays but during weekends, Docklands provides its best scenic views for tourist attractions who go around to shop and to restaurants. Formulating a structured environment for its diverse community. Docklands is also seen to build a relationship with its communities as they also become a Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

homing ground for events such as concerts and firework displays. Another reason that Docklands has put a lot of efforts to create a communal and safe space for people who use it, whether or not for long or short term. Although there are still sections of Docklands were industrial sectors dominate. However, Docklands are still implementing these spaces to coexist together.

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Human Culture Interview

20 Year old student After the interview I found it primarily interesting that docklands pier itself isn’t particularly drawn to most Melbournian’s. Its intriguing to find that its mainly significant once people have a need for it, this being surrounding areas such as the shopping district sporting areas and work related events. It would be a shame to see this pier fall apart due to lack of connectivity and interest to its locals. A particular proposal would most definitely be to formulate a structure that can unite peoples interests and create a space for people and its waterfront activities. 1- What brings you to docklands? Do you come here often? Live around the area? Work close by? I live 20 minutes away from Docklands and don’t visit too often. Unless I need to normally walk pass the pier when I am traveling to university. 2- How do you feel on a day like today? Do you think docklands has a special/ unique identity that drags you to it? If there is which areas are your most experienced place to be at? Its just kind of a nice area theres nothing Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

all too special about it, maybe some nice restaurants. I usually park here when I’m traveling into the city with friends and family. 3- What mode of transport do you take around docklands and what modes do you wish to interact more with? I mostly walk all over the city, otherwise I tram to Melbourne central. I’m content with my choices. I wouldn’t want to spend too much time around here, like theres nothing really eye catching about it. 4- How does it feel right now, in these wet weather conditions? What do you think docklands should improve on anything? Not my usual scene. Docklands isn’t specifically designed for a wet weather, how adjusting to a more covered area would actually take away from the space. 5- Do you believe docklands needs to consider its environment to fit a variety of different people who use it? Do you think it lacks human connectivity? Docklands is a shopping district primarily with options for social gatherings. It also is a higher class living area. Unfortunately besides the ice rink and the cinema it doesn’t attract a lot of flow. However I don’t think its docklands designs fault but its distance from the cbd.

6- What’s the first thing that comes to mind when I mention Docklands? Shopping district area and their Parking.

Natural Elements Waters Edge Major part of Docklands identity/image Different water types around location (e.g. calm, choppy, still) Water can affect sound quality and atmosphere in spaces Sun reflection off of waterâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s surface Greenery / Vegetation Limited amount of greenery around Docklands Trees scattered around Docklands park closer to city side (includes some seating and cover) Strips of grassed areas up along waterâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s edge on Northern side

Page Credit Kate Dunstan

Natural Elements Water Surfaces

The site visit has allowed us to experience and record sensory experiences with the water. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s reflection as the sun passes through it rebounds a pattern onto surfaces. The movement and sound of the water create a calming atmosphere. The sensual experience of the waters edge will be a major inspiration to our design.

QR code for video

Video Credit Kate Dunstan

Transport + Accessibility This diagram illustrates the different transportation methods that can be used in docklands to access the Victoria Harbour.

Transport + Accessibility This collage displays and captures the different transportations that people used in the site visit. Photographs are referenced by number and the location is identified by the corresponding number on the map.

Transport + Accessibility Pedestrians

Cyclists

Railway

Vehicles

Boats

Precedent Study.

https://www.designboom.com/architecture/vincent-callebaut-manta-ray-floating-ferry-terminal-seoul-korea-06-11-2017/

Manta Ray

By Vincent Callebaut Architecture Manta Ray is a project designed by Vincent Callebaut Architecture in submission to an international competition requested by the government of Seoul, Korea. The project brief was to design a ferry terminal. The client wanted a building that â&#x20AC;&#x153;combining the best of low-tech and high-tech while promoting the rehabilitation of urban ecosystems and biodiversityâ&#x20AC;?.

Project Year 2017 Location Seoul, Korea. Area 25,600 sqm

https://www.insidehook.com/article/home-goods/manta-ray-floating

g-terminal-concept-naturally-purify-seoul-river

Form study As the title of the project suggests, the form of the building is inspired by the hyperbolic geometry of a manta ray. This is relevant to its context as it is situated between the Han river and the Yeouido park in Seoul.

Form study

The form is based on the Manta Ray form.

Top View of Wind Turbines

The columns in the ground level hold the base so that is hovers over the water and creates a distance between the first level and the ground level which protects it from rises of water currents. This space is used for the ferry terminal which is the main function of this building.

The Manta Ray building produces 100% of its energy consumption. The wind turbines on the surface of the roof creates the majority of the energy consumed by the building while the rest is produced by solar panels in the edge of the roof

Top View Although the views of the form of the building appear to be curved, the top view/ floor-plan is based on a circle.

https://www.designboom.com/architecture/vincent-callebaut-manta-ray-floating-ferry-terminal-seoul-korea-06-11-2017/

Zoning + Function

Ground Level

Level 1

Level 2

Level 1

In depth functions

Vegetation

Ground Level

Level 1

Level 2

Circulation

Ground Level

Level 1

Level 2

Reflection In this diagram, the red outlined shape represents the site in Docklands and the black circle outlines Manta Ray. It is positioned at its exact scale which goes surpasses the site border. This is due to the fact that Manta Rays ground level is dedicated to a ferry/ boat terminal and needs water to be included within its border. Although its shape does not work well with the site, it forms a greater relationship with the water. The best aspect of Manta Ray that can be used in the Victoria Harbour proposal is how sustainable the building is. The form of the building contributes significantly to its efficiency. It produces 100% of the energy consumed by the building from the wind turbines that are found on top the structure along with solar panels. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s function of the building also suits Docklands context as a ferry terminal where it can bring more visitors to Docklands.

Dockland Site Manta Ray Building Boat arriving to terminal

Reflection Design Proposal.

Photograph by Kawthar Kordia

Reflection Design Proposal A site located near water brings so much peace and serenity just by its sound, motion and air breeze. This attract people be present in such a space to relax and reflect. This element brings so much potential to a successful project. Unfortunately, our site did not meet the same ambiance. Although it was quiet and surrounded by water, it felt dark and gloomy. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s not a place anyone would like to spend time in. It lacks life and greenery and isnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t a positive space to be in. Its heavy in industrial constructions such as fences, concrete, asphalt and cranes in the distance. Some challenges with the site is the sea level rise and temperature as waterfront spaces tend to be colder and have a lot more winds. Another challenge is that Docklands is a mix of different buildings and does not carry a theme. There are many residential buildings that are situated in the entrance of our site. This needs to be considered as an additional public building would bring more congestion and disturb the residents peace.

Issues

Photographs by Kate Dunstan & Parisa Bazargani

Possibilities

Design Proposal, Keywords and Themes.

Themes As a group, we have chosen these four themes implement in our proposal as the docklands lack in all these themes.

Multipurpose

Connectivity

Introducing multi-functional spaces would attract and engage more people to come together within a single space rather then dividing people.

The buildings connection to the water is crucial in the design proposal of the Victoria harbour as well as its neighboring buildings.

We believe that a building with multipurpose, connectivity, integration and fluidity would make a successful proposal.

Integration

Fluidity

Integration of spaces within the building will make it easier for users to navigate and will unify spaces of similar function to create an open space rather then dividing spaces next to each-other when they donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t relate.

The fluidity of the building is important as it affects the exterior form.

Proposal As previously mentioned, the Manta Rays building design concept is inspiring as it provides a terminal for ferrys on the ground level and spaces for the community to engage in the levels above. The fact that the building hovers over the water creates a strong relationship between the water and the building and the building with the land, having people connect with the water and the land at the same time. A proposed function for the building can be a ferry/boat terminal as a means of transport throughout the city as well as a communal space where people can participate in public recreational activities or attend private events in venues. The building should surpass the land outline as a space for boats to park is needed for the building to be functional. Dikes similar to Manta Ray can be used to hover over the water which protects the communal space from issues with water rise levels as well as providing space for the heights of the boats. Vegetation within and outside of the building would bring the greenery that Docklands is lacking in immensely.

Dockland Site Manta Ray Building Boat arriving to terminal

Proposal This form is both inspired by the arches of the chain iterations as well as natural landscape of rolling green hills. The benefit of using chains is that the weight and gravity create arches that create a self supporting arch if rotated upside down. The form is covered in greenery as docklands lack in natural vegetations. Having a form that replicates nature as well as creating a space for a boat terminal.

Master Plan

Photograph by Nicole Farnell.

Harbour The dock and its connection to the harbour plays a large impact on the site. The diagram shows how this may look and its human to water interaction via boats. As the water in the Harbour and river are not of the best quality there is no direct human water interaction alike what you would see at a beach. Water in a harbour also behaves differently with small ripples cause by wind or passing boats splashing against the dock. We would like to further develop the interaction with water on land by using the splashing sounds through pipes.

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Master plan Sound Pipes

Water As our main focus from the site analysis was on water we would like to bring that forward into the master plan of the site. Creating an arts and interactive space of Docklands we will introduce sound pipes and stairs. These pipes delve into the waters of Victoria Harbour and Yarra River extracting the sounds up onto the land for passers by. These subtle sounds will add an aspect of curiosity to the site and be a place many people will come to visit. Wind Using all the elements that Docklands has from water to wind we are implementing wind pipes. The wind pipes form another attraction to the interactive space by playing tunes as the wind rushes past. This creates a place for people to listen and reflect whether on a walk or a lunch break from work. Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Master plan Art Hub Form

The following study proposes the form developed into a singular spatial structure. This provides connectivity to the internal areas, whilst providing a larger floor plate for its divided spaces. The below images represent the form and structure variants with a legend representing its quantitative measures. In continuation, the form is developed further by adjusting its anchorage points internally to create variable views from differing angles. The structure is created to merge seamlessly to the roof, with glass exterior proposed, providing exterior views of the harbour. V V Count EL Edge Length ES Edge Strength S Strength

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Master plan Art Hub Form

The proposed form and structure proposes a singular Art Hub with four divided interior spaces to be further developed. The image on the left display the views of its exteriors. Initiating from its central internal point, the space is to be divided in to four differing sectors to refer to variable internal programs in relation to the creative arts field.

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Master plan As our main focus from the site analysis was on water we would like to bring that forward into the masterplan of the site. Creating an arts and interactive space of Docklands we will introduce sound pipes and stairs. These pipes delve into the waters of Victoria Harbour and Yarra River extracting the sounds up onto the land for passers by. These subtle sounds will add an aspect of curiosity to the site and be a place many people will come to visit. The left diagram illustrates the top view of our site. The circular opening provides a space for a boat terminal. This shape also depicts the motion of a wave. Connecting it to its context The diagram on left shows the different areas inspired by our chain iterations. They are displayed as silhouettes to capture the shape of the forms

Master plan North Plans and sections that display different views of our design. Our design focuses on senses projected by the sound tubes as well as a space for an art hub and a boat terminal.

South

West

Section A

East

Plan

Master plan

Circulation + Zoning These maps illustrates the circulation and zoning of the site. The users can experience two journeys, a sensory walk or a trip to event spaces. Throughout the site, green spaces are created for family activities such as picnics and barbequeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s. The circular space for the water provides a space for boat arrivals. Overall, the outline of the land is inspires my the shape of a wave which relates to its context of being a waterfront site.

Master plan

View of the arthub from a distance

View of the wind pipes that resembles the architectural context of doclands

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Concept Design. C1 Project Proposal C2 Development of Physical Language and Gesture C3 Final Design and Conclusion

Project Proposal.

Master Plan Concept

My proposal intends to capture docklands through different frames created by chains by our form finding. This is inspired my the image taken in docklands where the fences creates small frames. the view from the chain tunnel will capture the chain framing the neighbouring buildings and water. This tunnel invites people in where the tone is set for the rest of the site. When you first arrive, you are instantly greeted by the calming sounds of water through the pipes that echo their movement. This proposals also uses the whole cirrcular water edge surface for to take in a larger amount of people.

Master Plan Plan

Having a seating arena creates a communal area for people to socialise and connect. These “stairs” create a surface for seating. A boat can be used to create a stage in the water for the audience.

The landscape and shape that is formed is to blend land and water with a fluid shape.

Chain “manipulates” the land and creates a tunnel with openings between each chain link to view the water and the skyline. The tunnel guides you through a sensual walkway where water pipes echo the sounds of the water to enhance your hearing senses that reflect the context.

Master Plan Amphitheater

Master Plan

Zoning + Circulation

Art Centre Mass

Length 46248 mm Width 69757 mm Area 3231.74 mÂ˛ This design proposes the interaction between the art centre and the tower. This creates unity between old and the new which will create a contrast in their materials. This creates a great relationship between the proposed building to its context.

Development of Physical Language and Gesture.

Centre Pomidou-Metz Precedent

Project Centre Pompidou-Metz Architects Shigeru Ban Architects Location Metz, France Year 2010 Area 11000 m2 Gallery Space 5,000 m2 Height 77 m

Building Type Exhibition Support Structure Material Wood Facade Material Plastic GRP Roof material Plastic

The Mesh

Relation to our form and chains 1

The digital and physical model of the mesh of this building relates to the forms of our chain models we create. Similar to a chain we have explored, this design uses voids to extrude walls through them.

The â&#x20AC;&#x153;Chinese hatâ&#x20AC;?, designed by Japanese architect Shigeru Ban was seen as an inspiration for the shell of the building.

The inner wood mesh is projected through the translucent plastic outer shell at night.

Programs

Potential Program for our Proposals This building is predominately used as an exhibition space. It consists of 14 programs across four levels. Most spaces relate to the arts and a smaller fraction is used for cafes, restaurants and facility managements

Reflection 6

This building has brought great inspiration of exhibiting the beautiful mesh that supports the outer shell in different ways. In the day time, it is displayed within the buildings ceiling and at night it is projected through the translucent outer shell which can be seen in the facade of the building. This concept can highlight our chain structures.

Proposal Site Analysis

In this proposal, we used the views obtained from our site analysis to shape our building. The main views are used as anchor points for the buildings direction.

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Proposal Roof Form

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Proposal Vision

Proposal Plans

Ground Level

First Level

Second Level

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Proposal Sections

Exhibition

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Boat Terminal

Plaza

Proposal Elevations

North

East

South

West

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Proposal

Axonometric This diagram illustrates the different levels and layers of the building.

Proposal GFA

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Proposal GFA

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Proposal GFA

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Proposal Levels

Proposal Programs

Proposal

Vertical Accessibility

Proposal

Horizontal Accessibility

Ground Level

Page Credit Kate Dunstan

First Level

Second Level

Proposal Section

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Proposal Activities

Internal Docklands Port Views Industrial Area views External Seating Areas Bridges

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Community Interaction 1 2 3 4 5 6

Main Entrance Food Court Exhibition Space Offices Workshops Boating Exhibition

Proposal

Before & After

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic & Kawthar

Final Design and Conclusion.

Statement â&#x20AC;&#x153;The aim of our proposal was to use elements from our form finding and site analysis to persuade and create multifunctional spaces, whist keeping fluidity and connectivity between programs and spaces on both the horizontal and vertical axis. The main contributing factor to our forms and their placement was the views from the site.â&#x20AC;?

Image by Nicole Farnell

Themes

Sensory

Multipurpose

Our site provides users with multiple sensual experiences to enhance their observation of the siteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s context.

Programs such as an amphitheater serve as a space to gather people for public and annual events. It is also used as an observation and communal area for the public at any time of day. Spaces within the building also offer flexibility in terms of hiring spaces for numerous events.

Connectivity

The rood plays a major role in connecting water to land, exterior to interior of the building. It connects elements together in the choice of anchor points of the roof.

Fluidity

The landscape creates a fluid movement throughout the site. It shapes and compliments the anchor points of the roof, seamlessy connecting the landscape to the architecture.

Concept Inspiration The three key designs of our site can be divided into three. The roof, the building and the landscape. Each design influences an impacts one another. Our form finding and site analysis has shaped every design decision we have made.

C3 o ws vie

f do

cklands shaped the b

uild i

n l ue inf

he landscape ar o un d it

m, or

ng sf

cing t

wh ich m

Site Analysis Views

, pe sha anipulated the roofs

Form Finding Chain Iterations

Site Analysis Water Sensory

The views captured during our site analysis has shaped our buildings form and directions. Our building has framed the main views of docklands through its position.

Our form finding technique is the inspiration for our roof. Anchor points, similar to the chain, are developed and positioned carefully to provide greater purpose in functionality as well as additional sensory experiences.

In our site analysis, we payed close attention to the sensory experiences that a waterfront site provides. We wanted to enhance these experiences which shaped our landscape where it provides a sensual journey to our building.

Building

Roof

Landscape

Building Iterations

The building went through a series of different iterations where we initially wanted building that worked with the roof from our form finding but as we develop our building, we wanted to frame the views of docklands by using the main views as anchor points. This way, our building uses the same technique as our chains.

Final

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Roof

Iterations

Skin

The roof went through a series of iterations where the skin and grid were experimented with. We later wanted to introduce a void to create a point of interest in our roof top. Wings

Mixed

Down

Square Grid

Hexagon Grid

Triangle Grid

Grid

Square Grid

Hexagon Grid

Void

Triangle Grid

Square Grid

Hexagon Grid

Triangle Grid

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Final

Roof + Building Anchor points, similar to the ones our chain has, was used to create the roof. These points were positioned and designed to provide visitors with different experiences the site offers.

Roof

Anchor Points Each anchor point provides the visitors with different experiences.

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Roof

Water Collection The function of the roof goes beyond shelter and sensual experiences. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s funnel like columns collect rainwater that is used within the building.

Water Collection & Recyclable System

Key

Page Credit Parisa Bazargani

Sensory

Landscape Journey We have reflective water surfaces, a texture walk, wind pipes and water pipes to enhance the sensual experiences of the siteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s context.

Concept

Coming Together This animation (scan QR code) illustrates the progress of our concept.

Start

We created a space for an amphitheater to hold public events as well as a space for communal and observational area. We used the three main views of docklands as anchor points for the buildings directions. The existing viewing tower now connects to the interior of the building through a ramp that wraps around it. After we applied the roof, we shaped the landscape to compliment the anchor points of the roof. The rest of the landscape was dedicated for the sensory elements as a journey to the main building.

Finish

Before & After

Docklands Pier Before

Docklands Pier After

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Plans

Floor Plans

Ground Level

First Level

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Second Level

Third Level

Plans

Elevations

East

South

North

West

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

80% + 20%

Plans GFA

Ground Level

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans GFA

First Level

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans GFA

Second Level

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans GFA

Third Level

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

Sections Section Animations

Page Credit Nicole Farnell & Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

Axonometric Layers

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

Day & Night

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

Public/ Private

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Plans

Vertical Circulation The QR code illustrates the different vertical circulation in our building.

Page Credit Irina Tepavcevic

Plans

Horizontal Circulation & Access

Page Credit Kate Dunstan

Plans

Personas

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Detailed Design

Project Senso Tectonic System

The timber beams all lay in the same direction as their own group creating the hexagon structure. the ‘green’ is up top level with slots below. The ’purple’ is next, with slots either side to allow the ‘green’ and ‘pink’ beams to lock together. The ‘pink beams then slot in at the bottom. To keep these beams together a steel structural angle, or fish plate will be used. These can easily be bolted to the beams once they are slotted together. This will increase the grids structural integrity allowing it to withstand the large loads, such as heavy rainfall and winds.

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Project Senso Time Views

Dawn

Daylight

Dusk

Renders by Parisa Bazargani

Project Senso Entrance

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Project Senso Landscape

Image by Parisa Bazargani & Kawthar

Project Senso Exterior Views

Renders by Parisa Bazargani

Project Senso Interior Views

Page Credit Nicole Farnell

Project Senso Kawthar X Irina X Parisa X Nicole X Kate

Parisa References Elenberg Fraser, 2020, 13012_Premier Tower, ‘E03’ [image], © 2020 Elenberg Fraser, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://elenbergfraser. com/#!/project/13012_premier-tower>. Development Victoria, 2020, Docklands, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.development.vic. gov.au/projects/docklands?page=overview>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-public-realm-plan. pdf>. Docklands Waterways Strategic Plan, 20092018, Amenity and atmosphere, Page 6, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne. vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-waterways-strategy-2009-18.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, ‘Central City west context, 1892’ [screenshot], viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/ SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-publicrealm-plan.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Suburbs & Postcodes, Docklands, ‘suburb-map-docklands’ [pdf-image], viewed 18 March 2020, <https:// www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/suburb-map-docklands.pdf>.

City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, ‘ Impression of Docklands public realm in 2022’ [screenshot], viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ docklands-public-realm-plan.pdf>. Development Victoria, 2020, Docklands, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.development.vic. gov.au/projects/docklands?page=history>. Victoria Harbour Conservation, Management Plan, Docklands, 2012, ‘Engraving of the West Melbourne Dock under construction, 1892, by David Syme & Co. State Library of Victoria.’ [screenshot], Lovell Chen, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.au.prod.app.com-participate. files/8614/1221/3715/Victoria_Harbour_ Conservation_Management_Plan_CMP.pdf>. Victoria Harbour Conservation, Management Plan, Docklands, 2012, ‘Aerial view of Victoria Dock in 1927 following the widening of the entrance, with the 1916 Central Pier in operation, Public Records Office Victoria’ [screenshot], Lovell Chen, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.au.prod.app.com-participate. files/8614/1221/3715/Victoria_Harbour_ Conservation_Management_Plan_CMP.pdf>. Places Victoria and The City of Melbourne, Docklands Community And Place Plan A Guide,

Docklands, 1998’ [screenshot], viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov. au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-community-place-plan-map.pdf>. Places Victoria and The City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Community And Place Plan A Guide, viewed 18 March 2020, <https:// www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-community-place-plan-map. pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, About Melbourne, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic. gov.au/about-melbourne/Pages/about-melbourne.aspx>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Strategic Directions, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic. gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklandspublic-realm-plan.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/background-facts-3.pdf> City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/connectivity.pdf> City of Melbourne, 2009-2018, Docklands

R Waterways Strategic Plan, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/docklands-waterways-strategy-2009-18.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Heritage, © City of Melbourne June 2009, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https:// www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/appendix.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Bio-diversity and Waterways, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne. vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/background-facts-4.pdf>. Sarah Matthews, 2016, The erasure of Melbourne’s wetlands, ©2020 State Library Victoria, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https:// blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/such-was-life/the-erasureof-melbournes-wetlands/>. Sarah Matthews, 2016, The erasure of Melbourne’s wetlands, ‘blogimage_1’ [image], ©2020 State Library Victoria, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/ such-was-life/the-erasure-of-melbournes-wetlands/>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan Melbourne, Copyright © 2020

City of Melbourne, viewed 18 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/background-facts-4.pdf>. Melbourne 1945, ‘1945 Docklands’ [screenshot], Tiles © Esri, viewed 19 March 2020, <http://1945.melbourne>. Melbourne 1945, ‘Now Docklands’ [screenshot], Tiles © Esri, viewed 19 March 2020, <http://1945.melbourne>. Page 27: City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Bio-diversity and Waterways, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ background-facts-4.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Public Space Overview, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/public-spaces.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Water sensitive urban Design, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.melbourne. vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/background-facts-1.pdf>. City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public Realm Plan, Water sensitive urban Design and Wind Patterns, Copyright © 2020 City of Melbourne, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https:// www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/background-facts-1.pdf>.

City of Melbourne, 2020, Docklands Public

Alan Croker, 2017, Respecting The Vision, Syd-

Wikipedia, 2020, Docklands, Victoria, Wikipedia®, Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docklands,_Victoria>. Victorian Places, 2015, Docklands, Copyright © Victorian Places, 2015. All rights reserved., Viewed 19 March 2020, <https://www.victorianplaces.com.au/docklands>. Wikipedia, 2020, Docklands, Victoria, ‘Batmans_hill_1840_and_1892’ [image], Wikipedia®, viewed 19 March 2020, <https://upload. wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Batmans_hill_1840_and_1892.jpg>. Wikipedia, 2020, Docklands, Victoria, ‘Batmans_hill_1840_and_1892’ [image], Wikipedia®, viewed 19 March 2020, <https://upload. wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Victoria_docks_melbourne_in_the_1920s.jpg>. Victoria State Government and Melbourne Water, 2017, Wetland Design Manual, Part A1: Introduction pdf., ‘Wetlands’ [screenshot], viewed 19 March 2020

ney Opera House - a Conservation Management Plan, Sydney Opera House2020, Viewed 30 March 2020, <https://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/content/dam/pdfs/conservation-management-plan/SOH_CMP_Interactive_1.pdf>. Sydney Opera House, 2020, House History, Construction Begins, Sydney Opera House, Viewed 30 March 2020, <https://www. sydneyoperahouse.com/our-story/sydney-opera-house-history/construction-begins.html>. Sydney Opera House, 2020, House History, The Competition, Sydney Opera House, Viewed 30 March 2020, <https://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/our-story/sydney-opera-house-history/construction-begins.html>. Sydney Opera House, 2020, Visit Us, Come on in, â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;1600x900.jpg.image.800.450.highâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; [image], Sydney Opera House, viewed 30 March 2020, <https://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/visit-us. html>. Alan Croker, 2017, Respecting The Vision, Sydney Opera House - a Conservation Management Plan, [screenshot], Sydney Opera House 2020, Viewed 30 March 2020, <https://www. sydneyoperahouse.com/content/dam/pdfs/ conservation-management-plan/SOH_CMP_ Interactive_1.pdf>.

Precedent References 1 https://www.inexhibit.com/mymuseum/ centre-pompidou-metz/ 2 https://www.centrepompidou-metz.fr/en/ roofing 3 https://www.designboom.com/architecture/ the-metz-centre-pompidou-nearing-completion/ 4 http://www.gumuchdjian.com/projects/ pompidou-metz?ref=archive 5 https://mitraazimi.blogspot.com/2019/10/ centre-pompidou-metz.html 6 https://www.amc-archi.com/photos/ equerre-d-argent-2010-nomine-shigeruban-et-jean-de-gastines-centre-pompidoumetz,2280/axonometrie-centre-pompidou.10