Managing conflicting expectations from the electricity utility industry: Sri Lanka’s case Tilak Siy

Page 1

Managing conflicting expectations from the electricity utility industry: Sri Lanka’s case Tilak Siyambalapitiya 27 Sep 2021


The National Grid is 70 years old

Gains must be consolidated and enhanced, not reversed


High-level attributes of a “good” utility industry

• • • •

Technical quality Commercial quality Economic operations Safety


What are the expectations of an electricity industry, direct and indirect ? • • • • • • • •

Cover the whole country ✓ Reduce losses ✓ Improve reliability Reduce prices, provide subsidies ✓ Increase renewables, reduce fossil fuel use Provide employment ✓ ✓ Follow government policies ✓ Connect my solar rooftop ! I want a zero bill. ✓ Attend to my power outage ! I cannot wait !


Give me an electricity conenction ! 25

100%

Population (million)

20

80% 70%

15

60% 50%

10

40% 30%

5

20% Population

0 1970

1980

1990

Electrification

2000

Source: Sri Lanka Energy Balance 2018, data for 2019-2020 estimated

2010

10% 0% 2020

Household electrification rate

90%


8%

But look at this: 6.6% of households are closed !

Households with zero energy use

7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%

Jan-2002 Jun-2005 Nov-2006 Jan-2010 Jul-2014 June 2014 July 2017 Feb 2020

Source: CEB data, reflecting CEB customers. CEB supplies about 90% of all customers in the country


Reduce losses ! How are we doing ?

Loss as a share of Net Generation

14%

10.27%

12%

9.03% 8.95%

10%

8.84%

9.45%

8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2016

Loss of 1% is worth about Rs 2000 million Per year

2017

2018 2019 Year Transmission Loss Target Distribution Loss Target

2020

Sri Lanka actual T&D loss Source: Calculated using data published by CEB and LECO Note: Graph reflects losses in the national transmission and distribution network


So how can losses be reduced? What can be the targets for 2025 ? • Invest on upgrades: but where is the money? • Replace assets • Diligent monitoring of the network • Regular energy balancing at distribution level


Is the electricity supply getting more reliable ?


Reliability is declining: Reaching 100 trippings per year, over 100 hours without power supply every year 2014 SAIDI (hours per customer) SAIFI (outages per customer) SAIDI (hours per customer) LECO SAIFI (outages per customer)

2015

2016

CEB

59.4 102

50.6 91

97.2 125

Sources: CEB annual reports, CEB and LECO Statistical digests Notes:

CEB transmission and distribution losses include losses to serve LECO. SAIDI: system average interruption duration index SAIFI: system average interruption frequency index CEB and LECO define SAIDI and SAIFI for outages of 1 minute or longer

2017 2018 77.3 80.2 32 37 69.9 70.5 109 105

2019 110.1 72 111.4 117


Unreliability seen here is in distribution: this is not instability of the grid • Invest on upgrades • Distribution SCADA and automation • Efficient management of outages • Underground distribution: the next phase of distribution development, but where is the money to do that? • Urban planning, utility corridors ?


Do not raise prices, give me free electricity !!!

Average Selling Price to household customers using 90 kWh/month (UScts/kWh)

16 14

Manitoba, Canada

Philippines

Singapore

12

Thailand Assam, India

10 Hong Kong 8

Madhya Pradesh, India

China

2

Bangladesh Kerala, India Bhutan

Vietnam

Nepal

6 4

Maharashtra, India

Pakistan Malaysia

Tamil Nadu, India

Oman

Sri Lanka South Korea

Households

0 Source: Calculated using data published by country electricity suppliers Updated: September 2020


16

Maharashtra, India

Industries

Average Selling Price to industrial customers using 65,000 kWh/month (UScts/kWh)

Hong Kong 14 12 10 8

Assam, India China Bangladesh

Philippines Tamil Nadu, Kerala, India India

Singapore

Pakistan Madhya Pradesh, Malaysia India

Manitoba, Canada

Nepal

Sri Lanka South Korea

6 4

Bhutan

Thailand

Oman

2

Industry 0

Source: Calculated using data published by country electricity suppliers Updated: September 2020

Vietnam


Commercial customers: Offices, supermarkets, etc.

Average Selling Price to commercial customers using 58,000 kWh/month (UScts/kWh)

25

20

Hong Kong 15

10

5

Commercial

Maharashtra, India

Tamil Nadu, India

Assam, India Bangladesh Kerala, India

PakistanSingapore

Malaysia Philippines

China Nepal Manitoba, Canada Madhya Pradesh, Oman India

South Korea

Bhutan 0

Source: Calculated using data published by country electricity suppliers Updated: September 2020

Sri Lanka

Thailand Vietnam


How do customers use electricity: the case of households receiving subsidies


Do customers say: I am willing to pay

Share of household electricity customers 100% 90% 80% 600+ 181-600

70% 60%

121-180 91-120 61-90

50% 40% 30%

31-60 1-30

20% 10% 0% June 2014

July 2017

Feb 2020

Source: CEB Customers using up to 180 kWh/month receive a subsidy


Share of household electricity consumption 100%

Do customers say: I am willing to pay

90% 80%

600+

70%

181-600

60%

121-180

50%

91-120

40%

61-90

30%

31-60 1-30

20%

0

10% 0% June 2014

July 2017

Feb 2020

Source: CEB Customers using up to 180 kWh/month receive a subsidy


Almost all customers are subsidized now. In 2011 it was not so 2011

Customer Group

2019 - 2H

Cost Revenue Subsidy (% Cost (LKR/kWh) (LKR/kWh) of cost) (LKR/kWh)

Revenue Subsidy (% of (LKR/kWh) cost)

Households Other LV customers

18.99 14.04

10.42 16.56

45% -18%

25.35 22.81

15.09 19.61

40% 14%

LV Bulk customers MV Bulk customers Sri Lanka

12.11 10.32 14.90

16.72 13.44 13.68

-38% -30% 8%

19.32 18.10 22.02

18.35 15.18 16.82

5% 16% 24%


Increase renewables, reduce use of fossil fuels


How much of renewable energy do we use ?


Primary Energy Supply in 2018 Coal 10%

Petroleum 40%

Major hydro 10%

Non-conv. Renewable Energy 4%

Biomass 36%

Total Primary energy supply = 12.1 million tonne of oil equivalent Source: Sri Lanka Energh Balance 2018. www.energy.gov.lk

21


Read the Energy Balance for more information. Published annually. www.energy.gov.lk


Electricity provides only 12% of Final Energy needs of the country. How ?


Final Energy Supply in 2018 Coal 1%

Electricity 12% Petroleum Products 41%

Biomass 46%

So, what share of the electricity is produced from renewable sources?

Total Final energy supply = 9.9 million tonne of oil equivalent


18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thermal

Renewable

Electricity Generation : energy share

Electricity Generation (GWh)

What Energy share of Electricity is produced from renewables ?: 2013: 60% (good hydro); 2020: 37% (weak hydro)

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Year Thermal Renewable 25


Renewable Energy Share: How much from smaller power plants? Electricity Generation: Energy share

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50%

National Energy Policy Target: 10% by 2015 achieved, New target: 20% by 2020 not met

40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Year Renewables: Small hydro, wind, solar etc. Renewable: Larger hydro Thermal 26


Capacity Share and Energy Share in Electricity Production Sri Lanka consistently reports energy share, not capacity share

Share of all renewable energy in the grid

100%

End of major hydropower development

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

Energy Share: all renewables

10%

Capacity Share: all renewables

0% 1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020


Why did the renewable energy share drop in the 1990s? •

End of major hydropower development

Other hydropower projects (eg: Kukule, Upper Kotmale, Broadlands delayed for decades)

Other forms of renewable energy eitehr too expensive or technology still being developed

Rapid growth in electrification: Sri Lanka reached 100% electrification in 2016 •

In 1990, only 29% of households had electricity


A Private-sector led renewable energy development program commenced in 1996 •The Small Power Producer (SPP) Program • Introduced Standardised, non-negotiable agreement and tariffs in 1996 • Tariffs moved from “avoided costs” to “cost-reflective” for new contracts from 2007 • About 250 such SPPs in operation, 635 MW, provided about 10% of energy in 2019 • Outlook: New small hydro, biomass and waste to energy projects in progress, but very slow. Wind and solar PV now moving on competitive bidding.


Net metered Connection of renewable energy-based generation commenced in 2008 •Net metered renewable energy at customer premises allowed from 2008 •Buy-back prices introduced from 2016 •about 375 MW already in operation (solar roof tops), provided 8% of capacity, but 2% of energy in 2020. •Economics and role of rooftop solar PV widely misunderstood


Year

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

Electricity Generation: Energy share

Private Small Power Producer (SPP) Program since 1996: Results 14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%


Challenges with Existing Renewable Energy Power Plants Engineering challenges


Renewable-based Generation has: • Linkages to other users of the resource: Hydropower • Seasonality and interannual variations: wind and hydropower • Intermittency: solar power and wind power • Supply-chain uncertainty: Biomass • Limited contributition to power system stability • • •

Biomass; Good contribution Hydropower: Smaller contribution Wind, solar PV: zero contribution


Hydropower linked to Irrigation and drinking water: eg Mahaweli Basin


Share of all renewable energy in the grid

100% 90% 80%

Inter-annual 70% Capacity Share variations and Energy 60% Share in Electricity Production

50% 40%

Blackouts

30% 20%

Energy Share: all renewables

10% 0% 1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020


Intermittency: Solar power 700

Power Output (kW)

600

Output of the 740 kW Hambantota solar park, on a “good’ day

500 400 300 200 100 0 6:00

8:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00


2,000

1,500

500

0

6:27:00 AM 6:57:00 AM 7:27:00 AM 7:57:00 AM 8:27:00 AM 8:57:00 AM 9:27:00 AM 9:57:00 AM 10:27:00 AM 10:57:00 AM 11:27:00 AM 11:57:00 AM 12:27:00 PM 12:57:00 PM 1:27:00 PM 1:57:00 PM 2:27:00 PM 2:57:00 PM 3:27:00 PM 3:57:00 PM 4:27:00 PM 4:57:00 PM 5:27:00 PM 5:57:00 PM 6:27:00 PM

A 5 kW household solar PV system: Colombo Output Power (Watt)

6:18:00 AM 6:48:00 AM 7:18:00 AM 7:48:00 AM 8:18:00 AM 8:48:00 AM 9:20:00 AM 9:50:00 AM 10:20:00 AM 10:50:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:20:00 PM 12:50:00 PM 1:20:00 PM 1:50:00 PM 2:20:00 PM 2:50:00 PM 3:20:00 PM 3:50:00 PM 4:20:00 PM 4:50:00 PM

Output Power (Watt)

Intermittency: Solar power

3,500

3,000

2,500

A 4 kW household solar PV system: Colombo

1,000

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000 500 0


120

Intermittency of Wind Power (10 MW wind power plant)

Sustained Duration (minutes)

100 80 60

40 20 0

-10,000 -8,000

-6,000

-4,000 -2,000 0 2,000 4,000 Sustained Change in Power Output (kW)

6,000

8,000

10,000


An electric power system should be resilient What is resilience?

ürobustness and flexibility üredundancy to allow for continuity of supply üSmartness: its intrinsic adaptability, controllability and in-built capacity for recovery üFast recovery: ease of system repair and preparedness 39


A power system has to be in dynamic equilibrium all the times. Power generation should match the customer demand plus losses, at all times. “Exactly” or “approximately” match? G

Transmission

Distribution

Customer demand

PG = 𝑃! + 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 eg: 2600 MW of generation= 2530 MW of demand + 70 MW of losses [an exact match]

40


Sri Lanka’s Power System in Weak ! Hence it is not SMART • Even minor disturbances cause frequency excursions and load shedding. The traditional approach to strengthen is to raise inertia (larger, faster generators) and more spinning reserve • On this front Sri Lanka missed the bus ! • Rest of the world was building larger, stronger, faster generators …. • Sri Lanka stuck to hydropower development (for all the good reasons), ended up with a weaker power system 41


Challenges with Existing Renewable Energy Power Plant Financial challenges


Approved Cost of Generation: 2019 Power plant

Average Purchase price (LKR/kWh)

Energy (GWh)

Hydro

4,294.3

0.00

Thermal (oil) Coal SPPs (minihydro, wind, solar) Rooftop solar PV Self generation Total

4,663.8 5,159.4 2,117.8 109.9 119.2 16,464

24.15 9.89 19.24 22.00 36.00 12.82

Total purchase cost (LKR) 112,621 51,051 40,753 2,417 4,291 211,134

Renewable Energy is Expensive in Sri Lanka !

Approved Cost Structure and Income: 2019 Basis: Approved costs with forecast sales

Source: Bulk Supply Tariffs issued by PUCSL, 2019

Generation capacity cost Generation energy cost Transmission cost Distribution cost Cost of Supply Actual average price of electricity

47,037 211,134 12,545 56,191

Rs per forecast kWh sold 3.14 14.10 0.84 3.75

326,907

21.84

Rs million

17.03 43


Average costs for 2019

Cost of sales (SLRs/kWh sold)

40 35

Generation capacity

Transmission capacity

Distribution capacity

Generation energy

Average selling price

30 25 20 15 10 5 Larger hydro

Coal-fired

Oil-fired

Other renewables

Source: Approved cost and prices for July-Dec 2019, PUCSL

Total

44


The commercial reality: what is a fair price? Actual average purchase price (Rs/kWh) Minihydro 15.81 Ground mounted solar PV 22.85 Dendro 22.68 Biomass 10.96 Wind 19.52 All Small Power Producers 17.43 Rooftop solar PV 22.00 Average of all renewables 18.00 Add fixed costs of the system 7.67 Cost of delivered renewable energy 25.67 National average selling price 17.02 Loss by selling renewable energy 8.65 Type of renewable energy Actual 2019

45


Prices Paid and Actual Costs of Rooftop Solar PV Feed-in tariff of 2016 in the 2021 context

Capacity 10 kW (dc) 50 kW (dc) 500 kW (dc) 1 MW (dc)

Implemented Feed-in- Interest at market Tariff (LKR/kWh) rates

At concessionary interest rate (8%)

Simple payback period (years)

Simple payback period (years)

Up to 7th 8th to 20th Equity Year Year IRR

22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00

15.50 15.50 15.50 15.50

31% 35% 65% 72%

3.8 3.7 2.7 2.6

Equity IRR

Very high Very high Very high Very high

36% 3.8 Very high 40% 3.7 Very high Concessionary rate not available


Prices Paid and Actual Costs of Rooftop Solar PV Interest at market rates Simple Up to 7th 8th to 20th Equity payback Year Year IRR period (years) 15.00 11.00 11% 5.7 15.00 11.00 13% 5.4 11.00 7.00 13% 5.5 11.00 7.00 16% 5.2 Fair feed-in tariff for 2021 (LKR/kWh)

Installed Capacity 10 kW (dc) 50 kW (dc) 500 kW (dc) 1 MW (dc)

Good Good Good Good

At concessionary interest rate (4%) Simple Equity payback IRR period (years) 16% 5.7 High 19% 5.4 High Concessionary rate not available


Structure of the Sector Approved Costs Cost Component

Electricity Cost of Supply (LKR per kWh Sold) 2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Capacity

2.77

3.30

4.05

3.76

3.09

3.12

Fuel including renewable energy

10.29

10.53

8.62

12.74

13.19

13.92

Transmission

0.75

0.79

1.10

0.83

0.80

0.83

Distribution

2.72

2.78

3.70

3.47

3.56

3.72

Short-term Debt repayment

0.32

1.49

0.79

0.67

n/a

n/a

16.84

18.89

18.27

21.47

20.64

21.59

Generation

Total cost

Source: PUCSL tariff decisions for each respective year www.pucsl.gov.lk

48


The result of ten-years of utility regulation 2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

PUC- approved cost of supply (LKR/kWh)

16.91

14.95

21.32

22.12

16.84

18.89

18.27

21.47

20.64

21.59

PUC-approved price of electricity (LKR/kWh)

13.15

13.91

13.91

19.71

18.94

16.29

16.63

16.71

16.77

16.88

14,683

15,093

56.8

71.1

294.5

365.6

PUC-approved sales forecast (GWh)

9,121

9,666

10,427

10,949

10,949

11,271

12,049

13,360

Resultant annual financial loss to electricity sector (LKR billion)

34.3

10.1

77.3

26.4

(23.0)

29.3

19.8

63.6

Cumulative cash shortfall (LKR billion)

34.3

44.4

121.7

148.1

125.1

154.4

174.1

237.7

Source: PUCSL tariff decisions for each respective year www.pucsl.gov.lk

49


Emerging Challenges

Some of the Technical Challenges at distribution level


-500

-1000 Time

51

18:26:00

18:25:00

18:24:00

18:23:00

18:22:00

18:21:00

18:20:00

18:19:00

18:18:00

18:17:00

18:16:00

18:15:00

18:14:00

18:13:00

18:12:00

18:11:00

Power (kW)

Varying Customer Loads • Load variation of a single quay crane is shown below

1500

1000

500

0


3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000 220

500 215

0 210

Measured Voltage (V)

AC power

5000 260

4500 255

4000 250

6:13:00 AM 6:48:00 AM 7:23:00 AM 7:58:00 AM 8:33:00 AM 9:08:00 AM 9:43:00 AM 10:18:00 AM 10:53:00 AM 11:28:00 AM 12:03:00 PM 12:38:00 PM 1:13:00 PM 1:48:00 PM 2:23:00 PM 2:58:00 PM 3:33:00 PM 4:08:00 PM 4:43:00 PM 5:18:00 PM 5:53:00 PM

6:13:00 AM 6:48:00 AM 7:23:00 AM 7:58:00 AM 8:33:00 AM 9:08:00 AM 9:43:00 AM 10:18:00 AM 10:53:00 AM 11:28:00 AM 12:03:00 PM 12:38:00 PM 1:13:00 PM 1:48:00 PM 2:23:00 PM 2:58:00 PM 3:33:00 PM 4:08:00 PM 4:43:00 PM 5:18:00 PM 5:53:00 PM

Power output (W)

Performance of a Rooftop Solar PV System in 2017: Line voltages are already well above 230+6% = 243 V

Blame all around and forget it, or find solutions to it ? AC voltage

245

240

235

230

225

52


Solutions to technical constraints require research, standards and investments • Strengthening LV networks • Smart inverters • Battery storage (at customer level or along distribution lines) • Tap changing transformers


Solutions to Financial Constraints Require Political Will (to overcome commercial and policy lobbies) • Correct pricing of rooftop solar PV • Competitive bidding for wind power and solar investments outside rooftops


Example: How a 1 MW rooftop Solar PV is priced CEB or LECO network

Fair price: Rs 11.00 Buying price: 22.00

Sell all at a premium price

Buy all at a subsidised price

Cost: Rs 18.00 Tariff: 11.00

Industrial customer Source: Cost and Tariffs from PUCSL, 2019; Fair price calculation: author Note: All costs and prices are in Rs/kWh


Fixed Price Vs Competitive Bidding • In 2015, fixed price (called feed-in-tariff) was discontinued (for new agreements). Competitive bidding commenced. • Results are encouraging Type of Power Plant

Competitively Bid Price (Rs/kWh)

Commenced operations in

Feed-in- Commenced tariff operations in (Rs/kWh)

Wind 10 MW

12.50

2020

23.44

2015

Solar PV (ground mounted)

17.95

2019

23.10

2017


Financial barriers are as Strong as the Technical barriers


Instead of solving the techncial barriers and financial barriers, the debate is whether the target should be 50%, 70% or 80% by such-and-such-a-year.


Provide employment, another objective of the electricity industry


Sri Lanka is needsto sort-out issues, think and work strategically, with a clear focus on utility management No need to build big power plants; small is beautiful. Refineries are not required because future transport will be electric

Renewable energy is cheap

More subsidies must be given: free electricity, free solar panels

Potential saving: USD 1000 million per year Sri Lanka has no experience in gas imports and handling

There are two monsters that eat-up all our manufacturing and tea export income

CEB and CPC are service organizations. No need for profits. Electricity can be produced from sea waves (the country is surrounded by sea) 60


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.