Winter 2014 Course Evaluation 201420 Course:
University of Michigan Flint
75.01.15025935 - Teaching Gen Music Grades K-8 - MUS381/EDE346
Responsible Karen Salvador Faculty:
Department: Responses / Expected:
Overall Mean: 4.8 5-Point Likert Scale w/NA
3 / 11
(39 responses) 75.01.15025935
Responses
University Wide Course Questions
MUS
--- Period Comparisons ---
Course
MUS
SA A U D SD N Mean N/A Mode Low High
All
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
Q1 Overall, this was an excellent course.
2
1 0 0
0
3
4.7
0
5
4
5
235
4.4
49
13K
4.1
75
Q2 I learned a great deal in this course.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
235
4.5
76
13K
4.2
94
I had a strong desire to take this course.
2
0 0 1
0
3
4.0
0
5
2
5
234
4.0
32
13K
3.9
50
Q3
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
Salvador, Karen Responses
University Wide Instructor Questions
--- Period Comparisons ---
Individual
MUS
SA A U D SD N Mean N/A Mode Low High Q4
Overall, the instructor was an excellent teacher.
2
1 0 0
0
3
4.7
0
5
4
5
All
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
235
4.5
39
13K
4.2
66
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
Salvador, Karen College of Arts and Sciences Instructor
Responses
--- Period Comparisons ---
Individual
MUS
SA A U D SD N Mean N/A Mode Low High
All
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
Q5
The instructor set high standards for students.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
233
4.4
76
6.9K
4.4
93
Q6
The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
229
4.7
69
6.9K
4.5
89
Q7
The instructor was well-prepared for each class/unit.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
227
4.7
73
6.8K
4.4
92
Q8
The instructor provided opportunities in class for students to ask questions and/or make comments.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
226
4.5
74
6.8K
4.6
89
Q9
The instructor was willing to help students outside of class.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
221
4.4
74
6.6K
4.4
91
Q10
The instructor made efforts to improve student learning.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
232
4.4
74
6.9K
4.3
92
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean)
75.01.15025935
--- Period Comparisons ---
Responses
College of Arts and Sciences - Course
Course
MUS
SA A U D SD N Mean N/A Mode Low High Q11 I am doing well in this course.
All
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
N
Mean
Pct Rnk
2
1 0 0
0
3
4.7
0
5
4
5
231
4.5
53
6.9K
4.1
81
Q12
The course requirements and grading criteria were clearly defined.
2
1 0 0
0
3
4.7
0
5
4
5
232
4.5
40
6.9K
4.3
71
Q13
The course gave me the opportunity to think critically.
3
0 0 0
0
3
5.0
0
5
5
5
229
4.3
77
6.9K
4.3
92
Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Pct Rnk: Percentile Rank (100 is best, calculated vs. precise Mean) Q14 - Comment on the workload for this class. Response Rate: 33.33%
-
(1 of 3)
With all of the observations and projects, there is quite a bit of out of class work, but it really is not that bad. It is all informative and mostly interesting.
Q15 - What did you like best about the course? Response Rate: 33.33%
(1 of 3)
It is nice to get the teaching experience out in the field and to have an opportunity to explore the idea of teaching at the - elementary level if it is something that you have not considered before. Also, I enjoyed the way that the professor presented the material and was so into what she was talking about. Q16 - What suggestions would you make for the improvement of the course? Response Rate: 33.33%
(1 of 3)
- The blackboard page for this class was very confusing. I often found it hard to find where assignments were posted.