Roar!

Page 1

The Death of Protest? Ian Stirling Investigates p5 Volume 10 Issue 3 October 26th 2001

Inside Arts this issue...

American Pie 2 Giveaway

Facts of Life @ Hayward

DECIDEDLY DODGY DENTAL DEALINGS Equipment charges akin to ‘top-up fees’ GKT Dental Students are being forced to pay large amounts of money for dental equipment that is essential to their course. The equipment consists of a selection of dental tools, many of which you would recognise from your regular trips to the dentist. However many students complain that the range of equipment is too limited and dispute the argument that it will be useful for when they actually qualify. The Dental Institute claims that it is ‘traditional’ for students to buy these kits. This is a reference to pre-merger days when the dental school at UMDS used to let students buy very heavly subsidised kits. These kits were much larger than today’s and much cheaper. King’s Dental school ran a system of lending students the appropriate equipment for each teaching session. Since the merger the Dental Institute has started raising the prices of these kits and reducing the amount of equipment included. Some students feel that whilst before these kits may have been worth owning, they are now too small to be of use and that the institute should revert to the old Denmark Hill based system. The current charge is £423, which must be paid in full at almost exactly the same time as tuition fees. This means that some students are trying to pay £1075 fees and £423 equipment charge from their first loan installment which is less than this. These students still need to find money for basic living costs such as rent, and food. Guy Schofield, the VPGKT said “Student hardship is at its highest levels of all time, and to levy

this charge is very simply unfair. This is akin to a top-up fee. We are the only Dental school in the country to charge for equipment and I find this unnaceptable.” Chris Piper, KCLSU President echoed this by saying “I find these charges absolutely abhorrent. There was no indication given at the start that hese charges wouild be made. At a time when King’s is trying to broaden access it is a backwards step and will only hinder the progress of less advantaged students’. One dental student was told to apply for Access funding when he complained he couldn’t afford the charge. The Access funding is provided by KCL to help students who can’t afford basic living costs. It should not be used to cross-subsidise academic departments. Following pressure applied to college by Guy Schofield and Chris Piper, Professor Pitt-Ford, the sub-dean of Dentistry, has been asked to review these charges. When asked about these charges he refused to comment. The new Dean of the Dentistry School, Professor Nairn Wilson commented that he had been unaware of these charges up until Roar brought it to

his attention. He assures Roar that he will be investigating the matter. “I understand that these charges are clearly a cause for concern and that the money may be hard for some students to find. If these charges are to continue then there must be clarity in the way they are presented to students”. ROAR is fully behind this campaign and will bring you Professor Pitt-Ford and Professor Nairn Wilsons suggestions when they deliver them.

BI-ELECTION NOMINATIONS AND MANIFESTOES IN re:UNION


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.