Samuel L. Radford, Public Education & Parent Empowerment by Ken Nixon



District Parent Coordinating Council of Buﬀalo putting power back in the hands of parents

Advertisements

If You Have an iPhone, This Game Is A Must-Have

Report this ad

Sam Radford (716) 578-3571 PRESS RELEASE Parents make final appeal to Board of Education, Superintendent and Buﬀalo Teachers Federation to do what is best for Students. Resolve the contradictions: either teachers moving is musical chairs and brings chaos or is in their best interest. Either we don’t need the money to turnaround schools or we are one the poorest most underfunded districts in the country.

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 1 of 13

District Parent Coordinating Council representatives and Parents Reps, from the district’s Persistently Low Achieving schools met on Wednesday, July 27 to discuss concerns on district plans not to submit applications for all of seven of the eligible Schools Under Registration Review (SURR), and agreed to make a final appeal in advance of the July 31 deadline. Before parents consider direct action, we want to make every effort to implore the district to work in the interest of children and families. Two new developments since the last parent request have prompted the representatives to call on the Board of Education to call an emergency meeting with Regent Robert Bennett, Congresswoman Louise Slaughter and BTF President Phil Rumore. On July 15, 2011 – Congresswoman Slaughter issued a press release on her sponsorship of the ALL CHILDREN ARE EQUAL ACT (ACE) – HR 2485. (graph below) http://www.louise.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=2520&Itemid=100065. In it she states that Buffalo is the 3rd most underfunded school district in the country under the current Title 1 funding formula. The Congresswoman recognizes that Buffalo School District’s poorest and lowest performing schools do not have all the resources necessary to turn them around. Parents agree with the Congresswoman and are concerned that the District is not applying for 8 million dollars in Federal School Improvement Grants for 4 of these Underfunded Title 1 schools. On Tuesday an arbitrator ruled in favor the BTF regarding voluntary transfer of teachers. 590 (1 in 6) submitted requests for transfers. Which by every definition would be a large scale MUSICAL CHAIRS of teachers in the district. The Superintendent’s recommendation to move teachers from the 7 PLA schools would have affected a minimum of 50 and a Maximum of 200 teachers. BTF President Phil Rumore would not support the movement of teachers in that case because he called it a game of MUSICAL CHAIRS. Here we have potentially twice that number and the teachers are voluntarily initiating it. Parents feel that the needs of the students at the poorest and lowest performing schools are being neglected and are calling on those who have the power to do something about it to act before it is too late. July 31st is the current federal deadline. Regent Bennett has agreed to intervene with NYSED; if Congresswoman Slaughter can intervene with the US Dept. of Education, we can do something for the children who need it the most. With a one or two week extension by State and Federal officials we can do what is best for Children. The mission of the Buffalo School District is PUTTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST – TO ENSURE HIGH ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL. We are asking board members, our political and union leaders to live up to that mission. Putting us first means applying for needed resources for one the poorest and most underfunded school districts in the Country. The arbitrator gave three reasons for the ruling in favor the BTF 1. Inadequate Planning 2. Lack of informed fiscal prioritizing 3. Past Practice. All of these issues are potentially applicable if the District does not apply for these resources for the neediest of our students and families. 1. Inadequate Planning – We had almost a year to prepare a plan for each of these schools – there is no acceptable reason why the district should not

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 2 of 13

be able to develop an acceptable plan in a year. 2. Fiscal prioritizing – Can we really afford to pass up on 2 million dollars this years in one of the poorest most underfunded school districts in the Country. How do we justify this to this year’s cohort of students who are not able to benefit from the a changed learning environment and increased resources. 3. Past practice – has led each these schools to being Persistently Low Achieving and put on the Schools Under Registration Review (SURR) list. What are we doing any differently this year if we pass up on 2 million dollars to make the radical changes the School Improvement grant calls for. According to the U.S. Dept. of Education research, the currently recommended incremental changes have not worked in the PLA schools across the country. If we don’t make this effort of behalf of the students who need it most – we are in fact intentionally doing what we know will not work and perpetuating the problems within our school district. If all children are equal, we are asking that the poorest and lowest performing students get the same treatment and benefits as our highest performing and wealthiest students–schools that ACHIEVE!

 Leave a reply

July 28, 2011 Advertisements

Bitcoin is Dead - This Will Make Investors Rich in 2018

Report this ad

Parents at failing schools meet to discuss district’s failure to submit turnaround plans PRESS RELEASE

Parent Leaders from Buffalo’s Persistently Low Achieving Schools Meeting to discuss Strategy to address Districts Failure to submit plans

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 3 of 13

Parents invite representative from the U.S. Dept of Education to present at the Common Council Education Subcommittee and Board of Education Meeting Parent Leaders from Buffalo’s Persistently Low Achieving schools are concerned with the Board of Education’s Decision to submit applications for only 3 of 7 of the eligible schools. This is the second year in a row that the Buffalo School District has not been able to do what is necessary to ensure that they qualified to receive all the Grant money they are eligible for. Last year (2010) Buffalo received Race to the Top School Improvement Grant funds for only 4 of 7 of the eligible schools because of their refusal to move Principals at 3 of the schools. New York State Education Dept. did not accept Buffalo’s refusal to comply with the Grant requirements. In an Unprecedented move Commissioner Steiner came to Buffalo and spoke at a Board of Education meeting to make the State’s position clear. Underlying the District decision not to move Principals was an effort to accommodate Union concerns. Here we are in 2011 and the Buffalo School District again will not receive funding for at least 4 of 7 schools. The underlying reason is again UNION concerns. Superintendent Williams and the District Administration spent 1 year putting together a plan to move the Principal and half the teachers at all 7 schools which would have made them eligible to receive all the funds they qualified for. The Buffalo Teachers Federation publicly stated that they would not support any plan that called for the moving of even one teacher, consequently the District attempted to use the Education Partnership model with only 18 days of planning instead. Which has led to the District not submitting plans for most of the schools. Parents are concerned that the District is not being guided by its Mission to – Put Children and Families First to ensure High Academic Achievement for all. Clearly the district has put the concerns of Unions and Adults ahead of Children and Families. The parents have requested that the U.S. Dept of Education send a representative to Buffalo for the July 20, 11 am Buffalo City Council Education subcommittee meeting and the 5:30pm Board of Education meeting to give President Obama’s administration rebuttal to the Buffalo Teachers Federation accusation that he Moving the Principal and 50% of the Teachers is playing musical chairs, not based on research and will not turnaround failing schools. The U.S. Dept. of Education is prepared to stand by the Federal Turnaround Strategies. Parents are following up on a White house offer to send agency officials to local communities to ensure that Administration resources are able to get to the grassroots. The offer was made On July 1, 2011 when Vice President Samuel Radford attended a Community Leaders Briefing at the White House on behalf of the Buffalo District Parent Coordinating Council. Buffalo Parents feel that the Buffalo School district cannot afford to miss out on the availability of Millions of dollars in Federal Stimulus funds that can be used to Turnaround Persistently Low Achieving schools. “This is an opportunity that we may never have again” according to Buffalo Parent Leader Patricia Elliott. “How can we afford to pass up on 6 million dollars to turnaround each of our PLA schools? It is not fair to students who attend those schools. Teachers, Administrators’ and Board members will continue to benefit whether we get the funds or not. Only children and families will continue suffer from these decisions, for absolutely no good reason. We know for sure what we are doing know is not working how can we possibly lose by trying something different with the 6 million per school to do it.”

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 4 of 13

Press Conference Following meeting When:

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Time:

1:00pm

Location:

Gateway Longview center â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 347 E. Ferry St.

Speakers:

Parents Leaders of Buffalo PLA schools

ď&#x152;&#x20AC; Leave a reply

July 13, 2011 Advertisements

Report this ad

Under pressure from union, district fails to submit turnaround plans for 3 of 7 failing schools Press Conference:

Date:

July 7, 2010

Time:

7:30pm

Location:

347 E. Ferry St. Gateway Longview Center

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 5 of 13

Speakers:

DPCC Reps and Parents

Issue: Federation.

Addressing the Reality that district is turning down 24 million dollars to satisfy Buffalo Teachers

The Buffalo Board of Education has officially chosen not to seek funds for 3 of 7 PLA schools. We are eligible for 42 Million Dollars, we are applying for 18 millions. Leaving 24 Million dollars on the table, with no concern for how it will effect Students and Parents. Only consideration is accommodating the Buffalo Teachers Federation!!!

BUFFALO TEACHERS FEDERATION FLEXES ITS MUSCLE AND SHUTS DOWN EFFORTS TO RECEIVE OVER 24 MILLION IN FUNDS TO TURNAROUD BUFFALO SCHOOLS HERE IS HOW THEY DID IT!!!

Buffalo Public Schools Passes on an unprecedented Opportunity for change and Dooms to another Generation of Systematic Failure

Historical Context

The whole idea of President Obamas’ “Race to the Top” (RTTP) and School Improvement Grant (SIG) is to give the Buffalo Public School District the resources to fix Persistently Low Achieving (PLA) Schools. There is a catch however. You can’t simply appear to make change while keeping things the same.

For years Schools In Need of Improvement (SINI) and Schools Under Registration Review (SURR) have put together plans that move the furniture around in the classroom and pretend something has changed. The RTTP and SIG, have been designed by people familiar with the games that go on, particularly in large urban school districts. Districts are forced to make structural changes that will actually make reforms in order to get the money. The plan is brilliantly

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 6 of 13

designed and is actually working.

The RTTP and the SIG have single handedly exposed what has been the two primary sources of the persistent failure of the Buffalo Public Schools System:

1. A two-tiered system that is inherently separate and unequal. The system is not designed to produce educational equity for students. Lead Community Superintendent Dr. Mark Frazier, while answering a question about a delay in sending out school placement letters, has been clearly quoted as saying “The discussion that started in the fall (2010) was how we place students in the district; that is, have we by design created low-achieving schools by how we place students?”. Criteria-Based Schools (i.e., City Honors, Hutch Tech, DaVinci and McKinley) unfairly take the students with the highest averages (i.e., creaming), selecting only the students they want, and leaving the remaining students in schools without the resources and dedication characteristic of the criteria-based schools. This puts all the students who are not eligible for the criteria-based schools, or not as academically developed, in the remaining schools (of which most are PLA Schools). We ask this question: “IF ALL SCHOOLS ARE THE SAME (if there is equity), AND WE PROVIDE ALL STUDENTS WITH A TOP QUALITY EDUCATION, WHAT DIFFERENCE SHOULD IT MAKE WHICH “BUILDING THEY ATTEND?” The RTTP and SIG have exposed this flaw in the design of Buffalo Public Schools and provided the resources, literally $6 million per school over three years, to solve this problem. This is an unprecedented opportunity made available because of stimulus funds that, given the U.S. Budget Deficit, will probably never happen again. If we fail to access these resources and address the flawed structural design of our education system, we are dooming another GENERATION of Buffalo Public School Students to 50% graduation rates. This may work for Adults who will continue to have job security, but it does not work for students or the community they reside in. While all the adults who work in the system are not required to live in the community they work in experiencing the consequences they are part of causing. At the same time the school systems they send their children to are equitable and have high graduation rates. 2. The Stranglehold Buffalo Teachers Federation has on the Buffalo Public School District. (not the teachers, but the teachers’ union). In our view, teachers are as much victims of the system as are the students. Their union, on the other hand, has organized itself to take advantage of all the weakness of the system (i.e., its governance structure, purposely disorganized parents, ever changing board members, changing superintendents, etc). The Union is the only stakeholder who by design is responsible ONLY to its members. Teachers as stakeholders are responsible to everyone just like parents, board members and administrators, but their UNION is solely responsible to negotiate for the best interest of its members (independent of its effects or outcomes). The RTTP and the SIG provides us with a case study on how the Buffalo Teachers Federation (BTF) is effecting the district and will potentially be the barrier to prevent the district from getting the resources to make the structural

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 7 of 13

changes necessary to ENSURE HIGH ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS. Following the process that has taken place during the last year in our efforts get the SIG we found that: A. The Superintendent and his staff spent One Year researching the best way to turnaround seven of Buffalo’s PLA schools. At the end of their research, the Superintendent chose to make a recommendation that calls for moving the Principal and 50% of the teachers at 5 of the schools. The Buffalo Teachers Federation (BTF) adamantly refused to agree with this plan, with its President making the Statement at a Board of Education (BOE) meeting that “we will not compromise on the moving of any teachers.” There was no discussion on what was best for the students of the district. The only consideration for the UNION (and, based on its mission, rightfully so), was what was in the best interest of the members it represents. The BTF President asked the district to ask the State Education Department to give them a planning grant for a year so they could have time to research a model that was better for teachers. (Remember the whole point of the SIG is to FORCE STRUCTURAL CHANGES to fix or close PLA schools). Clearly the BTF does not want to see these kinds of changes and is trying to figure out how to maintain the status quo. The State Education Department has made it very clear on at least three occasions that they will not be awarding a planning grant. New State Education Commissioner, John King, said it personally. The BTF clearly believes they have the power to force the State Education Department to change their position. Remember this point because it will come up again later. B. Superintendent bows to the demands of the BTF and agreed to only move the Principals and half the teachers at 3 of the schools. The BTF, then, maintained its NO COMPROMISE stand. The Superintendent, then, agreed to just move the principal and teachers at just one school. The BTF, again, said “NO COMPROMISE.” They would not agree to a plan that moved any teachers. The BTF then recommended that all the schools use the Educational Partnership Option (EPO).

The Superintendent totally bowed to the demands of the UNION. At a BOE

meeting, based on on-the-spot negations, the Superintendent recommended all 7 schools use the EPO model without his staﬀ even being informed. Six months of research trumped by one week, then one hour, of research. July 7, 2011

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

 Leave a reply

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 8 of 13

Advertisements

Report this ad

Press Release:PARENTS CALL FOR STATE ASSEMBLY TO SUPPORT PARENT TRIGGER NOW!!! NEW YORK STATE SENTATE TO PASS PARENT TRIGGER BILL PARENTS CALL FOR STATE ASSEMBLY TO SUPPORT PARENT TRIGGER NOW!!! WE CAN’T AFFORD TO KEEP MAKING OUR CHILDREN WAIT

Buffalo’s Parents want Assembly Education Chair Cathy Nolan’s support for Buffalo’s Parent Trigger bill to empower parents to put our students first. Buffalo’s Parents left Albany on Wednesday confident that Assemblywoman Nolan could support a “Buffalo only” Parent Trigger bill. We traveled to Albany on Wednesday, June 15th to meet with State Legislators about the Parent Trigger and left with support from the State Delegation representing the City of Buffalo, the Chair of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus and other assembly and Senate members. Our champion of parents and better public education, Assemblywoman Crystal Peoples-Stokes welcomed us to Albany by introducing us to state officials on the floor of the Assembly. Assemblywoman Peoples introduced us to many influential members of the Assembly, whom pledged their support for our efforts.

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 9 of 13

Our children’s reality needs to be addressed now; we cannot wait another year. Assemblywoman Cathy Nolan, has the power to in a very meaningful way to support parents in our effort do what is best for our children. The arguments against the bill are insulting and the thought that Buffalo’s parents will not use this power responsibly is even more insulting. The fact is that, we are the only stakeholders in the entire system that will use our power responsibly by making every decision in the best interest of our own children, without a conflict of interest. Evidence shows that the same cannot be said for all stakeholders whose needs are met whether our children succeed or not. The result: 75% of our black and Hispanic males drop out of high school and less than 50% of all Buffalo students graduate from high school. We cannot afford to continue on this same path for another year. Senator Grisanti is confident that Buffalo’s Parent Trigger bill will pass the Senate, the Buffalo Delegation and Black and Puerto Rican Caucus are supportive. So the question is who gets to decide whether Buffalo Parents are responsible enough to use the power of the Parent Trigger? On behalf of Buffalo’s parents and students, we call on Assemblywoman Cathy Nolan to bring Buffalo’s Parent Trigger to the education committee and invite Buffalo’s parents to testify on Monday, June 20th. We are encouraged by the leadership of Assemblywoman Crystal Peoples-Stokes to help us build support within the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus. We are encouraged that Buffalo’s state delegation is supportive of parent’s rights. Assemblywoman Nolan’s comments are reason enough to put power back in the hands of parents. As parents of students in Buffalo’s failing schools, we do not have time to wait. Buffalo’s parents have made historic gains in the past year: we have representatives at each of Buffalo’s schools; we are recognized as stakeholders. What we lack is what every other stakeholder at the table has: the legal authority to protect our interests, putting our children first.

For Immediate Release

June 17, 2011

For more information contact

Sam Radford (716) 578-3571

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 10 of 13

 Leave a reply

June 18, 2011 Advertisements

Report this ad

Buffalo City Council supports Parent Trigger Support for New York State Adopting a “Parent Trigger Law” for Buffalo Public Schools—The Council adopted a resolution sponsored by Council Members Demone A. Smith and Michael P. Kearns expressing its support for New York State (“NYS”) Assembly Bill A7569 which would permit the parents of pupils attending a Buffalo Public School (“BPS”) on the NYS Persistently Lowest Achieving (“PLA”) list to choose implementation of an education intervention model. BPS educates nearly 33,000 students in 59 separate schools. Of those schools, 13 are currently on the PLA list and an additional 13 schools will likely be placed on the PLA list in the near future. NYS mandates that if a school is placed on the PLA list, the local school district must choose one of four education intervention models in an attempt to improve the school. Educational advocacy groups, including the Buffalo-based District Parent Coordinating Council (“DPCC”), have requested that parents be given additional tools to hold the school system accountable and give parents a larger voice in the education process. The proposed NYS legislation would allow parents at a PLA school to implement a chosen education intervention model by collecting signatures from at least 50 percent of the represented parents at the respective school showing support for that model. Advocates for this law assert that this law would give parents a greater role in the education of their children and would result in the school system being more responsive to their interests. June 15, 2011

https://districtparentcouncil.wordpress.com/

 Leave a reply

6/12/18, 6:27 PM Page 11 of 13