Portfolio

Kevin Leong Selected Works M’Arch Andrews University

ABOUT

This portfolio is a compilation of different design projects completed in both Singapore Polytechnic and Andrews University. The work spans from 2006-2017 and ranges in scale of projects and also includes a collection of my professional work, urban sketching and photography. The aim is to display my ability to solve design problems, work with the community as well as to communicate my skills in different fields.

Kevin Leong kevinl@andrews.edu 269-332 4466

education Masters in Architecture Andrews University June 2017 - May 2018 Bachelor of Science in Architecture Andrews University Aug 2013 - May 2017 Diploma in Architecture Singapore Polytechnic Apr 2008 - Feb 2011

experience

leadership

AMG (Architecture Missions Group) Architecture Intern June 2017 - Present

Design Think Tank Chair American Institue of Architecture Students National 2017 - 2018

Brooks Architectural Inc Architecture Intern Nov 2016 - May 2017 Andrews University School of Architecture Computer Lab Assistant Aug 2014 - Aug 2016 AC Consortium Singapore Architecture Drafter Mar 2011 - Jul 2011 Methaphor Architects Singapore Architecture Intern Oct 2009

NAAB Accreditation Team AIAS Student Representative Howard University 2018 Chapter President American Institute of Architecture Students Andrews University 2016 - 2017 Design Think Tank Member American Institue of Architecture Students National 2016 - 2017 Exhibition Chair ‘Aggregate’ Architecture Student Exhibition 2015 - 2016 Professional Development Director American Institute of Architecture Students Andrews University 2015 - 2016 Secretary Andrews University Student Association Senate [Student Government] 2015 - 2016 Community District Senator Andrews University Student Association Senate [Student Government] 2014 - 2015

service

skills

Hurricane Maria Relief Mission Puerto Rico Oct 2017

3ds Max Adobe Creative Suite AutoCad Hand Drawing/ Drafting Laser Cutting Leadership Microsoft Office Model Making Revit Sketchup Vray Wood Work

Singapore Military Service Singapore Civil Defence Force Medic Aug 2011 - Aug 2013 Mission Trip Chiang Mai, Thailand

recognition

languages

Stduent Grand Prize CNU Charter Award 2017

English - Native Mandarin - Fluent

AIAS Chapter President Honor Award 2017 Nominee AIAS Chapter Honor Award 2017 Nominee

Academic work

01 02 03 04 05 06

The Ubuntu House Lot 42 S Gen Housing El Cano, Water Plaza Health Reform Institute Movable Housing

Professional work

07 08

Caledon Workspace Andrews Academy Chapel

Miscellaneous

09 European Study Tour 10 Humans of Andrews

The Ubuntu House Instructor: Andrew Von Maur,

Troy Hommenchuck Term: Fall Sem 2016 // Arch247 Site: Umbumbulu, Durban, SA

This project was done through Urban Design Studio which is a group project participated by the whole class along with non-profit organization Ubuntu Design Group.

The Ubuntu Process conducted in Umbumbulu revealed the crucial need for a sustainable low-cost housing strategy. The project team, in collaboration with Nkosi Makhanya, selected the Mtshalis as the pilot family for the first Ubuntu House.

In keeping with the principle of “listen to build�, the project team prepared a preliminary design proposal, which was reviewed extensively by the Mtshalis, their extended family and friends.

The proposal was also collaboratively reviewed by architecture faculty and students at Durban University of Technology before being significantly revised by the project team subsequent to an indepth site visit.

The resulting Ubuntu House is not a typical low-cost product. It is a climate-responsive design that enables the family to earn an income, thereby promoting financial independence. Its site arrangement promotes social interaction and useful open space. It also promotes local materials and methods to prioritize investment in local, small-scale builders and the immediate Umbumbulu economy.

Modular study models

01

Adaptability In low-cost housing, mass production and preengineering can help to save costs, but designs must enable diverse outcomes and conditions.

First, the form of the building must easily enable additions, expansions, and flexibility of use without complicating ventilation, daylighting, or the shedding of water. In mild climates, thin-wing massing has proven to be most effective. In this strategy, most parts of the building are one room wide and are either arranged in a linear form or around exterior courtyards.

A kit of parts The Ubuntu House is conceived as a kit of parts that enables flexibility for diverse needs and site conditions. A selection of options is shown here.

The parts are somewhat like “modules” - not preassembled off-site, but cost-estimated and precisely detailed in advance. The modules include the “wet” core of kitchen, bathroom, living (yellow); two alternate bedrooms (blue); and a shop unit (red).

In all arrangements, the locations of all door and window openings are maintained the same.

Plan configurations

Rendering of the Mtshali House, an Ubuntu House prototype

From top to bottom:

Workshop with Umbumbulu highschoolers Presentation with the Mtshali family Presentation at the Sohonakhona Tribal authority Presentation at the eThekwini Municipality

Listen to build The design and planning professions exist to serve people in their efforts to live more healthy, productive, and edifying lives. Yet our professions have also been guilty of focusing on solutions that don’t really serve our clients’ objectives or best interests. There are many explanations for this, and also excuses, but at the heart of this challenge is the struggle to prioritize people over processes, institutions, economics, and one’s own world view.

This has tangible consequences. Designers of low-cost housing might focus on the bottom line, production efficiency, approvals, engineering factors, political struggles, government-sponsored studies, international trends, and the culture of the prevailing industry - yet the voice of the individuals being served might rank relatively low (or be mute). Likewise, urban planners might focus on municipal budgets, land use regulations, policy frameworks, institutional politics, best practices literature, and development trends - yet the communities in questions may never be consulted in earnest.

In Umbumbulu, there are two processes that overlap: the municipal process and the process governed by the Sobonakhona traditional tribal authority. The latter is revered by tradition and plays a major local leadership role, especially regarding land use on tribal land. Every day, people seek out Nkosi Makhanya and his InDunas for advice, direction and assistance, whether in formal meetings at the tribal court offices or informally in the street. The tribal court is accessible, respected, part of the community, present.

By contrast, local people perceive the municipal offices of central Durban to be abstract, opaque, and distant. This is in spite of the best intentions of understaffed municipal planners - evidence for these intentions can be found in eThekwini’s many excellent planning documents. Distance challenges relationships, as does the mono-centric institutional culture discussed previously. It is difficult to live out the Zulu concept of Ubuntu (“I am because you are”) in this context.

And yet, an extended engagement with locals reveals that Umbumbulu citizens are creative people who understand local limitations but can also offer real working solutions. A walk with an InDuna reveals a precise understanding of how the curb radius of a road impacts vehicular speeds, accidents, and business at the informal markets. A discussion with a room full of local residents illustrates how housing is the foundation for strong communities, but also that it matters how the design considers local needs and the participation of local skills. A design workshop encourages councillors to lay out a vision of how commercial development can be inclusive of independent retailers. And extended meetings reveals that local challenges with alcohol abuse can be met by beginning with a sustainable agriculture strategy.

This project is not a policy plan for directing municipal or tribal implementation - as if government and traditional authorities could provide for everything. It is an invitation to reimagine the potential of Umbumbulu and eThekwini by listening to people in order to build collaboratively.

Rendering of Ubuntu Houses in urban context by Angie Figiueroa

Lot 42 Instructor: Robin Johnson Term: Spring Sem 2014 // Arch247 Site: Empire, MI

The brief is to design a two-story residential home with a carraige house using heavy timber construction. The site is located in Empire Michigan.

The concept is to blur the boundary between private and social space to create a ‘social house’.

Pulling and Pushing spaces to allow ‘green’ spaces into the project.

The project consisted of designing a main house along with a carraige house. The main house had three bedroom, a convertable guest room, living room, kitchen and bathrooms.

The project was hand-drafted on vellum paper.

02

First floor plan

Second floor plan

Side Elevation

two-story residential home with a carraige house struction. The site is located in Empire Michigan.

he boundary between private and social space to Pulling and Pushing spaces to allow ‘green’ spaces

View of carraige house from sunken garden

Back elevation

Front elevation

Section model

S Gen Housing Instructor: Ken Chew Term: Year 2, 2009 // arc255 Site: Queenstown, Singapore

The brief is to design a 5-storey residential housing for the silver generation, namely those above the age of 65. The project site is situated at Queenstown, Singapore, which is one of the mature estate in Singapore with about 60% of the residents belonging to the silver generation.

The concept is to create modular units using precast concrete construction. Each unit has movable panels which allows human activities to define the architectural facade of the project.

This project has about 60 units. Each modules make a one bedroom apartment that comprises of a bedroom, kitchen, bath and living. Two units share a common double volume space that is an ‘outdoor’ living room/garden to increase interaction between users of the building. There are five bigger units that are two bedrooms and comprises of two modules stacked up on top of each other.

Throughout the building, there are double volume spaces that are public spaces such as the gym/ excercise corner, library, gardens and swimming pool.

The concept of the building is that it is a blank canvas and the residents are the painting through their activities.

This project was done through Autocad, sketchup, vray and photoshop

03

Balcony

Unit

Double Volume Garden

Typical Unit Module

Stacked Modules

Exterior rendering from street

Interior Renderings

Part Plans

Partial Section

Detail Drawings

Detail Drawings

El Cano, Water Plaza Instructor: Andrew Von Maur Term: Fall Sem 2017 // arch Site: San Juan, Puerto Rico Team: Kevin Leong Rachelle Dunn Jose Ramos Kevin O’Brian

This Urban design studio is a group project that involved the entire class in collaboration with the G-8 community and Enlace in Puerto Rico.

This project seeks to build on this principle and the work already accomplished in order to promote next steps: •Housing at Avenida Quisqueya - needed for those to be displaced by the Caño’s dredging.

•A water plaza on the Caño at Las Monjas - a model for harnessing the dredging’s legacy.

•A vision for the western edge of the G8 - to help unlock the dredging’s full potential for San Juan.

The following is a design proposal for a water plaza located in Las Monjas (see red dot on the adjacent map). It is only one in a series of water plazas along El Caño Martín Peña. These plazas have been part of the Integrated Development Plan from the beginning, and current plans by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are preparing for their implementation.

The main purpose of the water plazas is to enable the G-8 communities to meaningfully connect to the benefits of a dredged Caño waterfront - socially, environmentally, and economically.

The plazas are also planned to be critical elements of a green infrastructure system, as described in the recent Smart Growth Implementation Assistance study supported by the U.S. EPA Office of Sustainable Communities. This makes the water plazas key parts in mitigating future flood risks.

Process Sketch

04

A Cool Gathering Place Appropriate shade trees shelter a classic central plaza with simple proportions, built-in benches and a central fountain.

Pervious Paving The plaza is paved with pervious pavers that, together with large tree wells, are part of a stormwater detention system.

Easy Orientation The layout of the plaza and its colonnade lead to the waterbased transit dock and kayak rental pavilion.

Estuario Education Center Designed to educate about environmental stewardship, the Caùo’s history, and the estuary ecology of San Juan.

Preliminary sketch of proposed Water Plaza

Preliminary sketch of proposed Water Plaza aerial view

Economic Opportunities Concentrated near the bridge are a market barge, small shops, and a dedicated space for food truck parking.

Sun Shading Trees and retractable shading devices shape diverse spaces for different degrees of shade or open sky.

Social Opportunities Diverse but distinct places for gathering and resting at different scales are located within view of each other.

Human Scale Large water plazas must be scaled into diverse “outdoor rooms� using trees + planters

Arial view of water plaza

Site plan 1. Under Bridge Café 2. Container Shops 3. Market Barge

4. Food Truck Parking 5. Water Transit Stop 6. Kayak Rental

The proposed water plaza in Las Monjas is designed as part of a network of open spaces leading from the projected housing site at Avenida Quisqueya. The boulevard there is extended to run as a green street through a small park and into the water plaza and the Caño.

This forms a complete system for stormwater conveyance and detention as a means of flood mitigation. The new tree-lined corridor is fronted by higher density housing. This whole arrangement helps visitors to navigate within the neighborhood and leads pedestrians to the plaza, the pedestrian bridge and the north side of the Caño. In keeping with the Integrated Development Plan, the small park replaces one of the most challenging informal developmet clusters within the G-8 district.

7. Education Center 8. Bus Stop 9. Basketball Court

10. Community Garden 11. Public Utility Building 12. Mangrove Boardwalk

Section through sunken plaza

Section through basket ball court Step 1 - Crushed Gravel Gravel beneath the street purifies and stores excess water that permeates through the pervious surface.

Step 2 - Basketball Court An open-system container that can detain stormwater before allowing it to safely flow into the CaĂąo through the surface.

Step 3 - The Marsh Detains and filters stormwater with restored mangrove vegetation.

View of water plaza along the Cano

Adventist Health Reform Institute Instructor: Ariel Solis Term: Summer Sem 2017 // arch Site: Battle Creek, MI

This project was taken as an independent study class with Professor Ariel Solis. The brief of the project is to prepare a revilt model and construction drawings of the original health reform institute that burned down in 1902. The White Estate is seeking for funding to reconstruct the Health reform institute to turn it into a museum.

I modelled the building base on old photos and old floor plan in revit and did a rendering so that the White Estate can use it ofr PR purposes.

Photo of the original Adventist Health Reform Institute

05

View of the proposed reconstruction of the Adventist Health Reform Institute

1

South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"

1

West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"

Movable Housing Instructor: Lew Seibold, Ariel Solis Term: Fall & Spring Sem 2015 // arch Site: Chicago, IL

Architecture’s life The idea of a building having life is an interesting aspect of looking at architecture. In Buildings must die, a perverse view of architecture, it refers to architecture deploying a range of metaphorical conventions to invest buildings with life.

Stephen Cairns refers to building structures as “sinews” and “bones”; walls are likened to biological “membranes” or “skins” that may even “breathe”; windows and doors are understood as sensory apertures that “see,” “smell,” and “hear”; some spaces are thought of as “cellular,” others as “flowing”; and ornamental markings are characterized as “tattoos” or “cosmetic layers.”

Building geometrics are animated by “bending,” “twisting,” and “folding,” while the conception of spaces that facilitate movement-corridors, staircases, vestibules as circulation is so engrained in archutectural thinking that it’s derivation from human physiology, and the circulation of bodily fluids is long forgotten.

Architecture’s rebirth Architectur is not defined by just a building, but it is also space, and the human activities that makes a space. In buildings must die, the authors write that architecture’s rebirth comes from this foundational link to creativity by design, a link that has been rehearsed, modified, and reasserted throughout the history of the discipline. The constant experimentation of being creative with architecture to prevent it from deterioration or destruction is a solution asserted by human beings in their constant search for a better life, or a way of living

06

Site Our site sits in Wicker Park which has seen great changes in its community throughout the years from being a heavily populated polish community in 1930s to a heavily populated hispanic community in the 1960s. Our site is located right next to the Bloomingdale trail, which is a converted railway track that has now been converted to a greenway.

The constant evidence of changing societal norms and architectural values leads to a focus on its rebirth and how it would be related to design.

Movable Housing The idea of this project is that these precast units can be moved on trailers to other structures around the country. Each precast module is a studio size apartment. One and a half module makes a 1 bedroom and two modules makes a 2 bedroom. The idea is that the core, circulation paths and steel structure will be built and eventually residents can move in with their precast modules.

Architecture as placemaking In Codesigning Space, Irena Bauman writes that architecture provides “protected and controlled environments for human activities. At its best, architecture interfaces, with its context to create man-made places that enhance our experience of being together.”

Architecture, however splendid, does not itself create good places. Places are created by our activities. The essential ingredient of good place making is an aspiration for ‘civicness’ in architecture expressed generously to society. It is the offer of a physical fabric as a backdrop,

Rendered view from street

Arial view of proposed design

Public outdoor rooms There are very few spots along the streets of modern towns and neighborhoods where people can hang out, comfortable, for hours at a time.

People are different, and the way they want place their house in a neighborhood is one of the most basic kind of differences.

-Christopher Alexander To make sure that the different kinds of people can find houses which satisfy their own particular desires, there should be each cluster of houses, and each neigborhood should have three kind of houses: queit backwaters, on busy streets, and those that pay more or less in between.

View of roof-top garden facing interior courtyard Small public spaces A town needs public squares; they are the largest, most public rooms, that the town has. But when they are too large, they look and feel deserted. -Christopher Alexander Make a public square much smaller than you would at first imagine; usually no more than 46-60FT across never more than 70FT across. Applies only to its width in the short distance.

View of interior courtyard Shopfront schools Around the age of 6-7, children develop a great need to learn by doing, to make their mark on a community outside their home.

If the setting is right, these needs leads children directly to basic skills and habits of learning -Christopher Alexander

View from greenway

3

Section 2 - Through Courtyard 1" = 20'-0"

4

Section 3 - Parallel to Milwaukee Ave 1" = 20'-0"

Sections

ARCH 442 Prof. Seibold, Solis, Davidson & Ockerman

Architecture's Rebirth

Kevin Leong

SPRING 2016

7

2

North 1" = 10'-0"

5

East 1" = 20'-0"

Elevations

ARCH 442 Prof. Seibold, Solis, Davidson & Ockerman

Architecture's Rebirth

6

Kevin Leong

Milwaukee 1" = 20'-0"

SPRING 2016

7

Wall secition

Caledon Workspace Firm: AMG Year: 2017 Site: Grand Rapids, MI

Caledon Workspace is an office space meant to house start-up tech firms. Even though I was not involved in the innitial schemetic design phase, I was tasked to create design proposal drawings and eventually construction drawings for the client.

I was involved in making minor design changes according to the clients feedback after the schemetic phase. Along with the Architect, I help to create the construction documents that included foundation drawings, structural calculations and detailing using Revit software.

The project is currrently under construction.

Rendered street view of proposed design

07

2

1

2

A3.2

A3.2

A3.2

4' - 8" 4' - 8"

21' - 4"

2"

2"

DECK

10' - 3" 4' - 8"

3' - 9"

1 A3.1

1

DN

A3.1

13' - 6 1/2"

3' - 4 1/2"

7' - 11"

3' - 1"

OPEN OFFICE 201

2

53' - 6 1/2"

1' - 7 1/2"

61' - 5"

9' - 5 1/2" 61' - 5"

3' - 4 1/2" 9' - 9"

61' - 4"

A3.1

13' - 0 1/2"

2 A3.1

3

29' - 6 1/2"

UP

3

A3.1

A3.1

OPEN TO BELOW

3

24' - 0"

A3.2

4

4

A3.1

A3.1

20' - 2 1/2"

21' - 4"

2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"

Second floor plan

PROGRESS SET - NOT F

4' - 8"

ALL OTHER LOCATIONS #2 GRADE AT 16" O.C.

9' - 4"

12' - 0"

9' - 4"

12' - 0"

B.

ALL INTERIOR WALLS AND PARTITIONS SHALL BE 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE - U.N.O.

C.

ALL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING - U.N.O.

D.

ALL INTERIOR DIMENSIONS SHALL BE TO FACE OF STUD - U.N.O.

P.O. Box 358 Berrien Springs, MI 49103

1 A3.2

Enter address here

2 A3.2

MARTIN D. SMITH, ARCHITECT, L.L.C.

AT 12' HIGH WALLS WITHOUT LATERAL SUPPORT, CONTRACTOR'S OPTION FOR M-12 FRAMER SERIES STUDS AT 16" O.C., OR #2 GRADE AT 12" O.C.

PATIO 8' - 0"

7' - 6 1/2" 3' - 0" x 7' - 0"

5' - 10 1/2"

5-1/4" X 5-1/4" PSL POST

3' - 7 1/2"

4' - 2 1/2"

RESTROOM 105

3' - 2" 6' - 5"

11' - 1 1/2" 1' - 6"

3' - 1"

9' - 0 1/2" 13' - 8 1/2"

1' - 10 1/2"

4' - 8"

1 A3.1

3' - 0" x 7' - 0"

4' - 2 1/2"

2"

3'-0"x7'-0"

MECH/ STORAGE 106

2"

UP

29' - 6 1/2"

OFFICE 104

7' - 0 1/2"

7' - 4 1/2"

3' - 0" x 7' - 0"

5-1/4" X 5-1/4" PSL POST

3' - 0" x 6' - 8"

(3) LVL 1-3/4" x 14"

OPEN OFFICE 102

3' - 0" x 7' - 0"

A3.1

61' - 4"

2 X 8 FLOOR JOISTS @ 16" O.C.

OFFICE 103

7' - 0 1/2"

2

61' - 5"

LOFT ABOVE

3 A3.1 3' - 0" x 6' - 8"

3 6' - 6"

A3.2

27' - 7"

OPEN OFFICE 101 24' - 0"

DESCRIPTION

4 13' - 3"

A3.1 REVISIONS DESCRIPTION

NO

3'0" x7 '-0 "

2"

ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2 X 6 STUDS WITH 7/16" SHEATHING AND 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR FINISH - U.N.O.

Caledon Workspace

FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES A.

21' - 4"

1

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"

First floor plan

PROJECT: M17-101 ISSUE DATE: 10/30/17 TITLE:

FLOOR PLANS

PROGRESS SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/14/17

SHEET:

A1.1

4 1 X 12

EXTERIOR ELEVATION KE 1 1 X 12

4 1X6

1.

FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING. SMO 7" EXPOSURE. (HARDIEPLANK LA

4 1X4

2.

METAL WALL PANEL, EXPOSED F 26 GAUGE, SMOOTH FINISH, GAL HEIGHT (MBCI PANEL PBC)

3

3.

STOREFRONT FRAMING: TUBELI THERMALLY IMPROVED, 1" INSUL MEDIUM STYLE ENTRANCE DOO

4.

TRIM: FLAT STOCK

5.

ASPHALT SHINGLES.

6.

STEEL GUARDRAIL WITH HORIZO

7.

SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT.

8.

GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT. 'K' -

9.

CANTILEVERED ALUMINUM SUN CENTRIA WALL SYSTEMS SUN C MODEL 100-3S-4

10.

METAL ROOF EDGE

11.

STEEL COLUMN - 3 1/2 X 3 1/2 X 1

4

10 10

6

2

T.O.W 12' - 1"

1X4

9 A

4

T.O.W 12' - 1"

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8"

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8" Deck 7' - 8"

11

E

2

B

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

FIRST FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

T.O.F -3' - 2"

T.O.F -3' - 2" B.O.F -4' - 0" 3

South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"

5

10

C

7

6

T.O.W 12' - 1" 2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8"

3 11

D

D

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0" FOUNDATION PLAN 0' - 0" T.O.F -3' - 2" 2

West Elevation

1/4" = 1'-0" West elevation

5

4

1X6

4

1 X 12

8

T.O. 12' -

SECOND FLOO PLA 8' - 9 1

8 4

F

1X4 1

De 7' -

FIRST FLOO PLA 0' FOUNDATIO PLA 0' T.O -3' B.O -4' 1

East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROGRESS SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 10/30/17

EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES

2.

METAL WALL PANEL, EXPOSED FASTENIG SYSTEM. 26 GAUGE, SMOOTH FINISH, GALVALUME, 7/8" RIB HEIGHT (MBCI PANEL PBC)

2

3

3.

STOREFRONT FRAMING: TUBELITE 14000 SERIES, THERMALLY IMPROVED, 1" INSULATING GLASS, MEDIUM STYLE ENTRANCE DOOR.

4.

TRIM: FLAT STOCK

5.

ASPHALT SHINGLES.

6.

STEEL GUARDRAIL WITH HORIZONTAL CABLE RAILS.

7.

SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT.

8.

GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT. 'K' - STYLE

9.

CANTILEVERED ALUMINUM SUN SHADE. "C/S" CENTRIA WALL SYSTEMS SUN CONTROLS MODEL 100-3S-4

10.

METAL ROOF EDGE

11.

STEEL COLUMN - 3 1/2 X 3 1/2 X 1/4 GALVANIZED

9 A

4

T.O.W 12' - 1"

R N "

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8" Deck 7' - 8" E

P.O. Box 358 Berrien Springs, MI 49103 269-313-2631

FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING. SMOOTH TEXTURE. 7" EXPOSURE. (HARDIEPLANK LAP SIDING SMOOTH)

4 1X4

4

10

B

R N "

FIRST FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

F "

T.O.F -3' - 2" B.O.F -4' - 0" South Elevation 3South elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"

5

10

C

7

T.O.W 12' - 1" 2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8"

3

D

D

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0" FOUNDATION PLAN 0' - 0" T.O.F -3' - 2"

Enter address here

1X4

1.

MARTIN D. SMITH, ARCHITECT, L.L.C.

1 X 12

4 1X6

Caledon Workspace

W "

4 1 X 12

1

1 A4.1

ROOF SYSTEM #3 - LOW SLOPE EPDM MEMBRANE ROOFING -60 MIL FULLY ADHERED 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. SPRAY POLYURETHAN INSULATION (MIN R-30) FASCIA TRIM SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT

ROOF SYSTEM #2 - STEEP SLOPE RIDGE VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER ROOFING FELT 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING WITH CLIPS 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION (MIN R-30) ICE BARRIER FASCIA TRIM GUTTER

FLOOR SYSTEM #1 3/4" SHEATHING, GLUED & NAILED. (ADVANTECH) FLOOR JOISTS: 2 X 8 SYP 16" OC 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD CEILING

2 X 8 RAFTER TIES @4'-0" O.C.

T.O.W 12' - 1" SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8"

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

8' - 8 1/2"

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

8 A1.2

ROOF SYSTEM #1 - STEEP SLOPE RIDGE VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER ROOFING FELT 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING WITH CLIPS MANUFACTURED WOOD TRUSSES BLOWN-IN INSULATION (MIN R-49) ICE BARRIER FASCIA TRIM GUTTER ROOF SYSTEM #3 - LOW SLOPE EPDM MEMBRANE ROOFING -60 MIL FULLY ADHERED 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM (MIN #1 R-30) SPRAY POLYURETHAN INSULATION FIBER CEMENT SIDING FASCIA TRIM SHEATHING: SCUPPERWALL AND DOWNSPOUT OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. 5 INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) A4.1 FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

4 A4.1

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #2 METAL WALL PANEL SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

T.O.F -3' - 2"

Transverse section 2

Longitudinal section TRANSVERSE SECTION 'B' 1/4" = 1'-0"

1

ROOF SYSTEM #3 - LOW SLOPE EPDM MEMBRANE ROOFING -60 MIL FULLY AD 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. SPRAY POLYURETHAN INSULATION (MIN R-30 FASCIA TRIM SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT

ROOF SYSTEM #1 - STEEP SLOPE RIDGE VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER ROOFING FELT 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING WITH CLIPS MANUFACTURED WOOD SCISSORS TRUSSES BLOWN-IN INSULATION (MIN R-49) ICE BARRIER FASCIA TRIM GUTTER

ROOF SYSTEM #3 - LOW SLOPE EPDM MEMBRANE ROOFING -60 MIL FULLY ADHERED 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. SPRAY POLYURETHAN INSULATION (MIN R-30) FASCIA TRIM SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #2 METAL WALL PANEL SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

2 A4.1 3 A4.1

T.O.W 12' - 1" EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #2 METAL WALL PANEL SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #1

FIBER CEMENT SIDING SECOND FLOOR WALL SHEATHING: PLAN OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. 8' - 9OPTION 1/8"2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

2 X 6 CEILING JOISTS

FIRST FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

LONGITUD 1 1/4" = 1'-0 TRANSVERSE SECTIO 1/4" = 1'-0"

FLOOR SYSTEM #2 OUTDOOR DECK OVER UNHEATED 5/4 COMPOSITE DECK BOARDS 12' - 1" TREATED 2 X 8 FLOOR JOISTS @ 16" O.C.

ROOF SYSTEM #2 - STEEP SLOPE RIDGE VENT ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER ROOFING FELT 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING WITH CLIPS 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION (MIN R-30) ICE BARRIER FASCIA TRIM GUTTER EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

6 A4.1

ROOF SYSTEM #3 - LOW SLOPE EPDM MEMBRANE ROOFING -60 MIL FULLY ADHERED 1/2" PLYWOOD OR O.S.B. SHEATHING 2 X 12 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C. SPRAY POLYURETHAN INSULATION (MIN R-30) FASCIA TRIM SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT

FLOOR SYSTEM #1 3/4" SHEATHING, GLUED & NAILED. (ADVANTECH) FLOOR JOISTS: 2 X 8 SYP 16" OC 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD CEILING

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

T.O.W 12' - 1"

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8" Deck 7' - 8"

FIRST FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

T.O.F -3' - 2" B.O.F -4' - 0"

DINAL SECTION 'E' 0"

DHERED

0)

FLOOR SYSTEM #1 3/4" SHEATHING, GLUED & NAILED. (ADVANTECH) FLOOR JOISTS: 2 X 8 SYP 16" OC 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD CEILING

EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM #2 METAL WALL PANEL SIDING WALL SHEATHING: OPTION 1: AIR BARRIER OVER 7/16" O.S.B. OPTION 2: 7/16" ZIP SHEATHING SYSTEM 2 X 6 STUDS AT 16" O.C. INSULATION - (MIN. R-21.3) FULL CAVITY OPEN-CELL SPRAY FOAM 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS

T.O.W 12' - 1"

7' - 0"

8' - 1"

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 8' - 9 1/8" Deck 7' - 8"

6' - 11 1/2"

FIRST FOUNDATION FLOOR PLAN 0' - 0"

36B1D

3 T.O.F

Kitchen Elevation 1 - a 1/4" = 1'-0"

36SB

36B4D 36B4D

Andrews Academy Chapel Firm: AMG Year: 2018 Site: Berrien Springs, MI

The client wanted a remodel of the existing chapel that was constructed in the early 1970s. The clients main brief was to have a rendered view of the proposed design so that they could use it for fundraising.

I was involved in the schemetic design alongside with the Architect. I was tasked to create a Revit file based on old hand-drafted blueprints.

I then modelled the proposed design on Revit and rendered and used photoshop to process the rendering.

The project is currently in the fundraising phase.

Process sketch

08

Rendered interior view of proposed chapel

Emphasis on Urban Sketch

European Analytical Study Abroad Five week architectural study tour visiting Rome, Tuscany, Paris, London and Stockholm.

European Study Tour Emphasis on Urban Sketching and Watercolor Instructure: Andrew Von Maur Year: Summer 2015 France, Italy, England, Sweden

09

Humans of Andrews Year: 2014 - 2016

This is a photography project modelled after Humans of New York. I founded this project on my campus to share stories and experiences of college students.

10

2018