Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) including
Bharat Nirman (Rural Connectivity)
A Presentation before
Hon’ble Minister, Rural Development 13th July 2011
Status of Road Network in India NH 2%
SH & MDRs 14%
Rural Roads 84%
Total length of road network in India : National Highways (NH) :
32 Lakh km 65,600 Km (2.05%)
State Highways & Major District Roads (SH & MDRs) : 4,32,000 Km (13.5%) Rural Roads : 27 Lakh Km (84.4%) 80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced 3.42 lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year 2000. 2
Graph May 2011 - LORENZ CURVES 2 K and May 2011 - PMGSY (BASED ON STATE WISE % of HABITATIONS CONNECTED) 100.00 90.00 Bliss
80.00 70.00 60.00
2K
50.00 40.00
Gini Coefficient May 2011 0.158
30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00
Gini Coefficient 2K 0.214
CUMULATIVE STATES
(Starting the least % Connected in 2K as well as in May 2011)
May2011
PMGSY Programme Objective ďƒ˜ Providing all weather connectivity to all habitations having population of 500 or more in plain areas and all habitations having population of 250 or more in Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V), Desert (as identified in DDP) areas and the 60 LWE affected/ IAP districts. ďƒ˜ To upgrade some eligible existing through routes and major rural link routes to ensure full farm to market connectivity. 4
Connectivity Status– ‘Core’ States 1,80,000 1,60,000 1,40,000
Total Habitations
1,20,000 1,00,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0
Connected in 2K
Connected by May 11
Sanctioned (incl 2K connected)up to May 11 PMGSY Target
Connectivity Status – ‘Initially highly Connected States’ 80,000 70,000 60,000 Total Habitations 50,000 Connected in 2K 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0
Connected in May 11
Sanctioned (incl 2K connected) up to May 11 PMGSY Target
Connectivity Status – Hilly States 18,000 16,000 Total Habitations
14,000 12,000
Connected in 2K
10,000
Connected in May 11
8,000
Sanctioned (incl 2K connected) up to May 11 PMGSY Target
6,000 4,000 2,000 0
Mizoram
Sikkim
Nagaland
Manipur Arunachal Meghalaya Pradesh
Tripura
Jammu & Uttaranchal Kashmir
Bharat Nirman (RC) and PMGSY Bharat Nirman – Habitations with population of 1,000 or more [500 or more in special areas]
PMGSY – Habitations with population of 500 or more [250 or more in special areas]
Bharat Nirman Rural roads – a major component of Bharat Nirman for augmenting rural infrastructure launched in Feb 2005. Aims to provide connectivity to habitations of population of 1000+. Eligibility for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V) areas being above 500. To cover 54,648 unconnected habitations involving 1.46 lakhs km of new roads. To upgrade/renew 1.94 lakhs km of Through Routes to ensure farm to market connectivity. Estimated investment Rs. 48,000 Cr (2003-04 prices) Original time frame March 2009 Revised time frame March 2012 9
Progress under Bharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component) Length in km
PMGSY (including BN) – Current Implementation Status Total Eligible
Projects Cleared (Sanctioned)
Completed upto May’11 Balance
Habitations (in Nos.)
Net 1,36,451 (Original – 1,68,268 minus the connected under other Schemes or non-feasible)
1,09,010 (80%)
78,951 (59%)
New Connectivity (km.)
3,65,094
2,56,425 (70%)
1,94,454 (53%)
Upgradation (km.)
3,74,844 2,24,900 (UG per se by GOI) 1,49,944 Renewal
1,64,096 (73%)
1,31,234 (58%)
A. Physical
B. Financial
( in Rs. Crore)
Value of projects cleared
Funds Released Upto May’2011
Expenditure
1,18,950
87,807
82,691
Addl. Funds reqd. (to complete ongoing projects in this Plan) 31,143 (+NABARD debt service 11 liability)
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (Length Targets and Achievements) New Connectivity
Sl. No.
Name the State
1
Andhra Pradesh
2
Arunachal Pradesh
3
Assam
4
Bihar
5
Chhattisgarh
6
Goa
7
Gujarat
8
Haryana
9
Himachal Pradesh
10
Jammu & Kashmir
11
Jharkhand
12
Karnataka
13
Kerala
14
Madhya Pradesh
Target (Total Length to be covered under PMGSY
3326 6095 14571 33544 37556 40 7453 26 12832 8412 21445 500 439 60264
Length in km
Upgradation
Achievement (upto March 11)
Target (Upgradation under PMGSY (60% of Upgradation Length)
Achievement (Upto March 11)
3373.95 2924.27 10091.06 7957.99 15895.04
10321 2512 7828 11149 10135
15801.62 1.67 16.20 4278.36 2513.48
1.87
114
156.83
3938.42 2.00 7141.30 1744.24 5589.70 500.78 592.98 33845.59
5449 4515 5659 3522 7457 10153 2631 22342
3217.98 4294.08 2123.07 139.91 572.55 13181.37 680.82 12672.60
New Connectivity Sl.No.
Upgradation
Name the State Target (Total Length to be covered under PMGSY
Achievement (upto March 11)
3055.83 2116.00 949.76 1898.68 1782.27 15173.07 820.13 33516.98 955.11 3348.55 1728.74 18904.88
15
Maharashtra
16
Manipur
17
Meghalaya
18
Mizoram
19
Nagaland
20
Orissa
21
Punjab
22
Rajasthan
23
Sikkim
24
Tamil Nadu
25
Tripura
26
Uttar Pradesh
4654 2131 2662 2021 1789 29374 979 36472 1107 4978 2980 38600
27
Uttaranchal
10429
3108.00
28
West Bengal
22995 367673
Total
Target (Upgradation under PMGSY (60% of Upgradation Length)
Achievement (Upto March 11)
11834 1428 2208 886 1023 16996 6088 15670 508 13321 1406 34244 4134
15699.60 472.94 15.00 73.50 857.71 4740.52 3542.47 14649.60 1371.37 5747.11 256.76 20409.38
10007.06
11375
190964.24
224906
683.69 128474.20
304.01
Progress under Bharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component) (1000+ in plain areas, 500+ in Eligible Hill & Tribal Areas)
Activity
Target (2005-12)
Projects sanctioned
Achievement up to May’11 (against target)
Habitations (in nos.)
54,648
53,570
40,364 (74%)
New Connectivity (length in km.)
1,46,185
1,41,864
1,28,446 (88%)
Upgradation Renewal (in km)
1,16,478 77,653 (1,94,131)
1,18,409
97,637 1,26,170 (as reported by States) (2,23,807)
•Work in Progress (against sanction) Habitations New connectivity Up-gradation Length
-
13,206 (25%) 13,418 km (9%) 20,772 km (18%) 14
Institutional Architecture Ministry of Rural Development
NRRDA
(Management Support)
Nodal Deptt. State Govt.
SRRDA including PRIs
(Programme Implementation)
STA/PTA
SQMs
(Independent Quality Monitor)
(Project Appraisal Support)
NQMs
(Independent Quality Monitor)
PIU
NRRDA: National Rural Roads Development Agency, SRRDA: State Rural Road Development Agency, 15 STA: State Technical Agency, PTA: Principal Technical Agency, NQM: National Quality Monitor, PIU: Programme Implementation Unit
Sources of Funding PMGSY Accrual from Diesel Cess – Rs. 5,550 crore (2011-12) Accrual from Diesel Cess largely committed for loan repayment during 2011-12. Externally Aided Projects World Bank Project ($1.5 billion) was launched on 19th May 2011. Possibility of launching of one more ADB Project ($ 0.8 to $1.2 billion). Limited Scope for further leveraging Diesel Cess to raise additional NABARD loans Key Issue: Financing of PMGSY. DEA should put ADB RRS-III P in “firm” category for 2011. 16
Requirement of funds to achieve PMGSY Targets
S. No.
Item
Amount (in Rs. Crore) at 2010-11 prices
1
Funds required for balance works yet to be sanctioned(new connectivity + upgradation)
80,000
2
Committed liability for completion of works already sanctioned
34,218
3 4
Impact of left out habitations(approx.) NABARD loan - Principal
8,000 17,600
5 6
NABARD Loan - Interest New habitations of 250+ LWE affected/IAP districts (approx.)
6,060 18,000
7 8
Missing Bridges (approx.) Impact of increase in length in length of bridges to 75 m in IAP distts (approx.)
8,000 2,400
9 10
Impact due to snow fall/land slides (approx.) Administrative Exp. Including for States, Quality monitoring etc.
5,000 1,000
Funds available during 2011-12
20,000
Need to Deepen Convergence With MGNREGA • At present under MGNREGA the following works can be covered: – Roads to connect habitations ineligible under PMGSY – Second or multi-connectivity to habitations – habitation - internal roads- other than PMGSY – Plantation along PMGSY roads.
Status of Core Network of Bihar 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Inconsistencies noticed in the tentative Core Network sent by the Govt. of Bihar. The State requested for permission for ground verification to finalize and freeze the Core Network Data. Sanction of Projects were made based on the tentative Core Network and certification of eligibility by the State/ Nominated Executing Agencies(NEAs). The habitation details of the Core Network have been analyzed in the presence of officers of RWD from all the districts and shortcomings found. Verification of habitations of the roads sanctioned to the NEAs (CPWD, IRCON, NBCC, NPCC and NHPC), involved on request of the State for implementation, is under process. Meeting at the level of SRD scheduled for 21st July 2011.
Quality Assurance –Mechanism A Three Tier Quality Assurance Mechanism institutionalized. First
Tier is in-house quality control, Second (SQMs) and Third Tiers (NQMs) are independent monitoring. Sustainable Quality achieved through effective interventions. – Quality Control at PIU linked to payment to contractors and stage passing concept introduced. – Independent monitoring at State level through structured inspections. Outsourcing permitted. – Independent monitoring of quality at National level further refined through close monitoring of action taken and evaluation of performance of NQMs. – The Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects to be treated as infructuous. 20
Inspection formats for NQMs Sl. No.
Item
1
Quality Control Arrangements (Lab)
2
Attention to Quality (maintenance of Records)
3
Geometrics
4
Earthwork and Sub-grade in Embankment/Cutting
5
Granular Sub-base
6
Base Course Non-Bituminous and Shoulders
7
Bituminous Surfacing
8
Shoulders
9
CD Works
10
Side Drains and Catch Water Drains
11
CC/Semi-Rigid Pavement and Associated Pucca Drains
12
Road Furniture and Markings. Overall Grading
Awarded Grade (S/U/SRI)
NQM Grading of Unsatisfactory Works Trends January 07 to May’11
60%
50%
40%
30%
30% 24% 22% 20%
17%
16% 13% 10%
0%
7% 4%
6% 5%
2%
3%
Jan'07June'07
July'07Dec'07
Complete U
14% 13% 11%
7% 7%
17% 13%
29% 27%
23% 23% 20%
28%
17% 17%
15% 15%
24% 24%
16% 16%
12%
9%
6% Jan'08June'08
July'08Dec'08
Complete RU
Jan'09June'09
July'09Dec'09 Ongoing U
Jan'10June'10
July'10Dec'10
Jan'11May'11
Ongoing RU
22
Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects Abstract of works for which expenditure treated as infructuous and deducted from the Programme funds of the respective States #
States
No. of Roads
Length (Km)
Cost (Lakhs)
1
Chhattisgarh
6
15.5
394.55
2
Karnataka
2
5.43
170.04
3
Maharashtra
1
8
230.94
4
West Bengal
3
13.38
451.98
5
Andhra Pradesh
1
1.28
83.74
6
Assam
3
6.67
519.26
7
Gujrat
4
5.81
126.90
8
Jharkhand
1
4.47
112.63
9
Rajasthan
5 26
31.51 92.05
400.23 2490.27
Total
Special Dispensation Accorded to LWE Affected Areas/IAP Districts • Included in the following four categories of proposals being considered for clearance under PMGSY (As per Advisory issued on 12th June 2009) – Residual new connectivity coverage envisaged under Phase – I of Bharat Nirman. – Projects to be taken up with the assistance of WB/ADB – New habitation connectivity in identified LWE affected (now enlarged to 60 LWE affected/IAP) districts – Special road connectivity packages announced for the border areas
Special Dispensation Accorded to LWE Affected Areas/IAP Districts
• Keeping in view of demands for concerned States, about a year back for upto 50 m length entire funds were being released from the Ministry (against 25 m length earlier). The limit has been increased to 75 meters. • It is not that bridges longer than 75 m are not covered, but cost on pro-rata basis is to be borne by the States. Causeways of all lengths are funded by GOI. • Qualification criteria relaxed for Contractors. The minimum tender package has been reduced to Rs. 50 lakh. •A sum of Rs. 2,000 crore was released to LWE/IAP Districts.
Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States
S. N
Item
Recommendations Submitted
1
Coverage of remaining Bharat All remaining eligible proposals be sent Nirman Works by the States immediately.
2
Coverage of missed out bridges All remaining eligible proposals be sent on roads already sanctioned by the States immediately. under PMGSY
3
Sanctions of Stage-II works for All remaining eligible proposals be sent such PMGSY roads for which by the States immediately. Stage 窶的 has already been sanctioned.
Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.
4
Inclusion or otherwise of CC (i) The roadway width should be exclusive of drain width and Parapet Wall parapet and side drains. Width in the roadway width. (ii) Minimum roadway width should be 6 meters. (iii) The width may be suitably increased on the request of SRRDA as per DPRs at curves, junctions etc. and road stretches facing heavy snowfall or land slides. (iv) Reputed institute be awarded an R&D study to suggest technological solutions especially using local material to control landslides in hilly areas. Convergence with MGNREGA to check landslides be also evolved through this study.
Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.
5
Higher costs due to transportation of Cement, Bitumen, Steel etc. and longer leads.
To start with a pre-bid conference with Cement Manufacturers should be convened either at Delhi or Kolkata in which States may project their annual requirement of cement covering all schemes run by the Ministry of Rural Development.
6
Relaxation of the (i) The existing procedure of Hill States for connectivity to current norm of habitations of population 250 and above in 2001 and population of 250 relaxations of path distance of 1.5km to form a cluster of persons and above in 250+ as well as relaxation of 10 km path distance in respect of Hill States International Border blocks be continued. (ii) To provide connectivity to the habitations of less than 250 population in 2001 even after availing the aforesaid relaxations; existing convergence provision in MGNREGA may be availed of by the States.
Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.
7
Relaxation of norms of 100% funding by Number of bridges of span: GoI for bridges of span up to 50 m by (i) above 50 meters upto 60 meters and covering bridges of span up to 150 m (ii) above 60 meters be assessed by the under 100% GoI funding States with crude estimates of bridge wise cost on PMGSY roads not yet cleared by the Department.
8 GoI funding towards maintenance XIII Finance Commission funds be used to partially cover enormous to supplement State funds. maintenance costs due to difficult terrain
Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.
9
Financial assistance from GIS interface is essential for Core GoI for GIS applications and Network and the necessary digitization of Core Network arrangement be evolved in consultation with States. Department of Science & Technology, Government of India be also approached.
10
Switchover to in all NE States
e-tendering All remaining States should switch over to e-tendering by 31st December, 2011.
PMGSY – Some Recent Actions Taken
Uploading of quality Grading of items/sub items and photographs of works inspected by SQMs:
PMGSY provides a three-tier quality monitoring mechanism
Under the second-tier, periodic inspections are required to be conducted by independent State Quality Monitors (SQMs). Each PMGSY project is expected to be inspected by the SQMs at least three times during the process of execution
All the SQM inspection reports are to be mandatorily entered in OMMAS along with at least 10 digital photographs
Measures to ensure Maintenance Funding of PMGSY roads by States
Release of Programme Funds has been made contingent upon crediting of required funds to respective SRRDA for maintenance 31
PMGSY – Some Recent Actions Taken (contd.)
Necessity of Consultation with Hon’ble Members of Parliament for new proposals under PMGSY: Incorporating the suggestions given by Hon’ble Members of Parliament should be an integral part of the preparation of Project Proposals
Necessity of a Transect walk :
Involvement of the local community in a transect walk can ensure suitable alignment, sort out the issues of land availability etc.
In view of above, a circular has been issued stating that the Project Proposals shall in future be accompanied with following documents:
Appropriate proof regarding the consultation with Hon’ble Members of Parliament
Minimum of ten photographs taken during Transect Walk
Minutes of meeting after the Transect Walk for each road 32
Major Institutional Interventions PPP: States being pursued to adopt PPP in rural roads on pilot basis. Models on deferred payment, i.e. Annuity basis being explored. National Consultation planned in February
GIS: GIS for mapping of core network on pilot basis. CDAC to provide technical support States to implement.
Independent Engineer: Deployment of Independent Engineer to supplement third tier. 33
Hill Cutting in difficult terrain Arunachal Pradesh
Bituminous Layer Construction
Maharashtra
Increased Market Access for Farmers
Tamil Nadu
Gujarat
Improved Transport Services Assam
Bihar
Andhra Pradesh
Improved Access to Schools
Assam
Karnataka
Kerala
Improved Access to Health Care
Creating Livelihoods
Gujarat
Roads Built in Forest Areas
Orissa
Nagaland
MP
Mizoram