PMGSY Presentation

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) including

Bharat Nirman (Rural Connectivity)

A Presentation before

Hon’ble Minister, Rural Development 13th July 2011

Status of Road Network in India NH 2%

SH & MDRs 14%

Rural Roads 84%

Total length of road network in India : National Highways (NH) :

32 Lakh km 65,600 Km (2.05%)

State Highways & Major District Roads (SH & MDRs) : 4,32,000 Km (13.5%) Rural Roads : 27 Lakh Km (84.4%) 80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced 3.42 lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year 2000.

2

Graph May 2011 - LORENZ CURVES 2 K and May 2011 - PMGSY (BASED ON STATE WISE % of HABITATIONS CONNECTED) 100.00 90.00 Bliss

80.00 70.00 60.00

2K

50.00 40.00

Gini Coefficient May 2011 0.158

30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00

Gini Coefficient 2K 0.214

CUMULATIVE STATES

(Starting the least % Connected in 2K as well as in May 2011)

May2011

PMGSY Programme Objective ďƒ˜ Providing all weather connectivity to all habitations having population of 500 or more in plain areas and all habitations having population of 250 or more in Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V), Desert (as identified in DDP) areas and the 60 LWE affected/ IAP districts. ďƒ˜ To upgrade some eligible existing through routes and major rural link routes to ensure full farm to market connectivity.

4

Connectivity Status– ‘Core’ States 1,80,000 1,60,000 1,40,000

Total Habitations

1,20,000 1,00,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0

Connected in 2K

Connected by May 11

Sanctioned (incl 2K connected)up to May 11 PMGSY Target

Connectivity Status – ‘Initially highly Connected States’ 80,000 70,000 60,000 Total Habitations 50,000 Connected in 2K 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0

Connected in May 11

Sanctioned (incl 2K connected) up to May 11 PMGSY Target

Connectivity Status – Hilly States 18,000 16,000 Total Habitations

14,000 12,000

Connected in 2K

10,000

Connected in May 11

8,000

Sanctioned (incl 2K connected) up to May 11 PMGSY Target

6,000 4,000 2,000 0

Mizoram

Sikkim

Nagaland

Manipur Arunachal Meghalaya Pradesh

Tripura

Jammu & Uttaranchal Kashmir

Bharat Nirman (RC) and PMGSY Bharat Nirman – Habitations with population of 1,000 or more [500 or more in special areas]

PMGSY – Habitations with population of 500 or more [250 or more in special areas]

Bharat Nirman  Rural roads – a major component of Bharat Nirman for augmenting rural infrastructure launched in Feb 2005.  Aims to provide connectivity to habitations of population of 1000+.

Eligibility for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V) areas being above 500.  To cover 54,648 unconnected habitations involving 1.46 lakhs km of new roads.  To upgrade/renew 1.94 lakhs km of Through Routes to ensure farm to market connectivity.  Estimated investment Rs. 48,000 Cr (2003-04 prices)  Original time frame March 2009  Revised time frame March 2012 9

Progress under Bharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component) Length in km

PMGSY (including BN) – Current Implementation Status Total Eligible

Projects Cleared (Sanctioned)

Completed upto May’11 Balance

Habitations (in Nos.)

Net 1,36,451 (Original – 1,68,268 minus the connected under other Schemes or non-feasible)

1,09,010 (80%)

78,951 (59%)

New Connectivity (km.)

3,65,094

2,56,425 (70%)

1,94,454 (53%)

Upgradation (km.)

3,74,844 2,24,900 (UG per se by GOI) 1,49,944 Renewal

1,64,096 (73%)

1,31,234 (58%)

A. Physical

B. Financial

( in Rs. Crore)

Value of projects cleared

Funds Released Upto May’2011

Expenditure

1,18,950

87,807

82,691

Addl. Funds reqd. (to complete ongoing projects in this Plan) 31,143 (+NABARD debt service 11 liability)

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (Length Targets and Achievements) New Connectivity

Sl. No.

Name the State

1

Andhra Pradesh

2

Arunachal Pradesh

3

Assam

4

Bihar

5

Chhattisgarh

6

Goa

7

Gujarat

8

Haryana

9

Himachal Pradesh

10

Jammu & Kashmir

11

Jharkhand

12

Karnataka

13

Kerala

14

Madhya Pradesh

Target (Total Length to be covered under PMGSY

3326 6095 14571 33544 37556 40 7453 26 12832 8412 21445 500 439 60264

Length in km

Upgradation

Achievement (upto March 11)

Target (Upgradation under PMGSY (60% of Upgradation Length)

Achievement (Upto March 11)

3373.95 2924.27 10091.06 7957.99 15895.04

10321 2512 7828 11149 10135

15801.62 1.67 16.20 4278.36 2513.48

1.87

114

156.83

3938.42 2.00 7141.30 1744.24 5589.70 500.78 592.98 33845.59

5449 4515 5659 3522 7457 10153 2631 22342

3217.98 4294.08 2123.07 139.91 572.55 13181.37 680.82 12672.60

New Connectivity Sl.No.

Upgradation

Name the State Target (Total Length to be covered under PMGSY

Achievement (upto March 11)

3055.83 2116.00 949.76 1898.68 1782.27 15173.07 820.13 33516.98 955.11 3348.55 1728.74 18904.88

15

Maharashtra

16

Manipur

17

Meghalaya

18

Mizoram

19

Nagaland

20

Orissa

21

Punjab

22

Rajasthan

23

Sikkim

24

Tamil Nadu

25

Tripura

26

Uttar Pradesh

4654 2131 2662 2021 1789 29374 979 36472 1107 4978 2980 38600

27

Uttaranchal

10429

3108.00

28

West Bengal

22995 367673

Total

Target (Upgradation under PMGSY (60% of Upgradation Length)

Achievement (Upto March 11)

11834 1428 2208 886 1023 16996 6088 15670 508 13321 1406 34244 4134

15699.60 472.94 15.00 73.50 857.71 4740.52 3542.47 14649.60 1371.37 5747.11 256.76 20409.38

10007.06

11375

190964.24

224906

683.69 128474.20

304.01

Progress under Bharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component) (1000+ in plain areas, 500+ in Eligible Hill & Tribal Areas)

Activity

Target (2005-12)

Projects sanctioned

Achievement up to May’11 (against target)

Habitations (in nos.)

54,648

53,570

40,364 (74%)

New Connectivity (length in km.)

1,46,185

1,41,864

1,28,446 (88%)

Upgradation Renewal (in km)

1,16,478 77,653 (1,94,131)

1,18,409

97,637 1,26,170 (as reported by States) (2,23,807)

•Work in Progress (against sanction) Habitations New connectivity Up-gradation Length

-

13,206 (25%) 13,418 km (9%) 20,772 km (18%) 14

Institutional Architecture Ministry of Rural Development

NRRDA

(Management Support)

Nodal Deptt. State Govt.

SRRDA including PRIs

(Programme Implementation)

STA/PTA

SQMs

(Independent Quality Monitor)

(Project Appraisal Support)

NQMs

(Independent Quality Monitor)

PIU

NRRDA: National Rural Roads Development Agency, SRRDA: State Rural Road Development Agency, 15 STA: State Technical Agency, PTA: Principal Technical Agency, NQM: National Quality Monitor, PIU: Programme Implementation Unit

Sources of Funding PMGSY  Accrual from Diesel Cess – Rs. 5,550 crore (2011-12)  Accrual from Diesel Cess largely committed for loan repayment during 2011-12.  Externally Aided Projects World Bank Project ($1.5 billion) was launched on 19th May 2011.  Possibility of launching of one more ADB Project ($ 0.8 to $1.2 billion).  Limited Scope for further leveraging Diesel Cess to raise additional NABARD loans  Key Issue:  Financing of PMGSY.  DEA should put ADB RRS-III P in “firm” category for 2011.

16

Requirement of funds to achieve PMGSY Targets

S. No.

Item

Amount (in Rs. Crore) at 2010-11 prices

1

Funds required for balance works yet to be sanctioned(new connectivity + upgradation)

80,000

2

Committed liability for completion of works already sanctioned

34,218

3 4

Impact of left out habitations(approx.)

NABARD loan - Principal

8,000 17,600

5 6

NABARD Loan - Interest New habitations of 250+ LWE affected/IAP districts (approx.)

6,060 18,000

7 8

Missing Bridges (approx.)

Impact of increase in length in length of bridges to 75 m in IAP distts (approx.)

8,000 2,400

9 10

Impact due to snow fall/land slides (approx.)

Administrative Exp. Including for States, Quality monitoring etc.

5,000 1,000

Funds available during 2011-12

20,000

Need to Deepen Convergence With MGNREGA • At present under MGNREGA the following works can be covered: – Roads to connect habitations ineligible under PMGSY – Second or multi-connectivity to habitations – habitation - internal roads- other than PMGSY – Plantation along PMGSY roads.

Status of Core Network of Bihar 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Inconsistencies noticed in the tentative Core Network sent by the Govt. of Bihar.

The State requested for permission for ground verification to finalize and freeze the Core Network Data.

Sanction of Projects were made based on the tentative Core Network and certification of eligibility by the State/ Nominated Executing Agencies(NEAs).

The habitation details of the Core Network have been analyzed in the presence of officers of RWD from all the districts and shortcomings found.

Verification of habitations of the roads sanctioned to the NEAs (CPWD, IRCON, NBCC, NPCC and NHPC), involved on request of the State for implementation, is under process.

Meeting at the level of SRD scheduled for 21st July 2011.

Quality Assurance –Mechanism  A Three Tier Quality Assurance Mechanism institutionalized. First

Tier is in-house quality control, Second (SQMs) and Third Tiers (NQMs) are independent monitoring.  Sustainable Quality achieved through effective interventions.

– Quality Control at PIU linked to payment to contractors and stage passing concept introduced.

– Independent monitoring at State level through structured inspections. Outsourcing permitted.

– Independent monitoring of quality at National level further refined through close monitoring of action taken and evaluation of performance of NQMs. – The Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects to be treated as infructuous.

20

Inspection formats for NQMs Sl. No.

Item

1

Quality Control Arrangements (Lab)

2

Attention to Quality (maintenance of Records)

3

Geometrics

4

Earthwork and Sub-grade in Embankment/Cutting

5

Granular Sub-base

6

Base Course Non-Bituminous and Shoulders

7

Bituminous Surfacing

8

Shoulders

9

CD Works

10

Side Drains and Catch Water Drains

11

CC/Semi-Rigid Pavement and Associated Pucca Drains

12

Road Furniture and Markings.

Overall Grading

Awarded Grade (S/U/SRI)

NQM Grading of Unsatisfactory Works Trends January 07 to May’11

60%

50%

40%

30%

30% 24% 22% 20%

17%

16% 13% 10%

0%

7% 4%

6% 5%

2%

3%

Jan'07June'07

July'07Dec'07

Complete U

14% 13% 11%

7% 7%

17% 13%

29% 27%

23% 23% 20%

28%

17% 17%

15% 15%

24% 24%

16% 16%

12%

9%

6% Jan'08June'08

July'08Dec'08

Complete RU

Jan'09June'09

July'09Dec'09 Ongoing U

Jan'10June'10

July'10Dec'10

Jan'11May'11

Ongoing RU

22

Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects Abstract of works for which expenditure treated as infructuous and deducted from the Programme funds of the respective States #

States

No. of Roads

Length (Km)

Cost (Lakhs)

1

Chhattisgarh

6

15.5

394.55

2

Karnataka

2

5.43

170.04

3

Maharashtra

1

8

230.94

4

West Bengal

3

13.38

451.98

5

Andhra Pradesh

1

1.28

83.74

6

Assam

3

6.67

519.26

7

Gujrat

4

5.81

126.90

8

Jharkhand

1

4.47

112.63

9

Rajasthan

5 26

31.51 92.05

400.23 2490.27

Total

Special Dispensation Accorded to LWE Affected Areas/IAP Districts • Included in the following four categories of proposals being considered for clearance under PMGSY (As per Advisory issued on 12th June 2009) – Residual new connectivity coverage envisaged under Phase – I of Bharat Nirman.

– Projects to be taken up with the assistance of WB/ADB – New habitation connectivity in identified LWE affected (now enlarged to 60 LWE affected/IAP) districts – Special road connectivity packages announced for the border areas

Special Dispensation Accorded to LWE Affected Areas/IAP Districts

• Keeping in view of demands for concerned States, about a year back for upto 50 m length entire funds were being released from the Ministry (against 25 m length earlier). The limit has been increased to 75 meters.

• It is not that bridges longer than 75 m are not covered, but cost on pro-rata basis is to be borne by the States. Causeways of all lengths are funded by GOI. • Qualification criteria relaxed for Contractors. The minimum tender package has been reduced to Rs. 50 lakh.

•A sum of Rs. 2,000 crore was released to LWE/IAP Districts.

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States

S. N

Item

Recommendations Submitted

1

Coverage of remaining Bharat All remaining eligible proposals be sent Nirman Works by the States immediately.

2

Coverage of missed out bridges All remaining eligible proposals be sent on roads already sanctioned by the States immediately. under PMGSY

3

Sanctions of Stage-II works for All remaining eligible proposals be sent such PMGSY roads for which by the States immediately.

Stage 窶的 has already been sanctioned.

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.

4

Inclusion or otherwise of CC (i) The roadway width should be exclusive of drain width and Parapet Wall parapet and side drains.

Width in the roadway width. (ii) Minimum roadway width should be 6 meters. (iii) The width may be suitably increased on the request of SRRDA as per DPRs at curves, junctions etc. and road stretches facing heavy snowfall or land slides. (iv) Reputed institute be awarded an R&D study to suggest technological solutions especially using local material to control landslides in hilly areas. Convergence with MGNREGA to check landslides be also evolved through this study.

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.

5

Higher costs due to transportation of Cement, Bitumen, Steel etc. and longer leads.

To start with a pre-bid conference with Cement Manufacturers should be convened either at Delhi or Kolkata in which States may project their annual requirement of cement covering all schemes run by the Ministry of Rural Development.

6

Relaxation of the (i) The existing procedure of Hill States for connectivity to current norm of habitations of population 250 and above in 2001 and population of 250 relaxations of path distance of 1.5km to form a cluster of persons and above in 250+ as well as relaxation of 10 km path distance in respect of Hill States International Border blocks be continued. (ii) To provide connectivity to the habitations of less than 250 population in 2001 even after availing the aforesaid relaxations; existing convergence provision in MGNREGA may be availed of by the States.

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.

7

Relaxation of norms of 100% funding by Number of bridges of span: GoI for bridges of span up to 50 m by (i) above 50 meters upto 60 meters and covering bridges of span up to 150 m (ii) above 60 meters be assessed by the under 100% GoI funding States with crude estimates of bridge wise cost on PMGSY roads not yet cleared by the Department.

8 GoI funding towards maintenance XIII Finance Commission funds be used to partially cover enormous to supplement State funds. maintenance costs due to difficult terrain

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East States-contd.

9

Financial assistance from GIS interface is essential for Core GoI for GIS applications and Network and the necessary digitization of Core Network arrangement be evolved in consultation with States. Department of Science & Technology, Government of India be also approached.

10

Switchover to in all NE States

e-tendering All remaining States should switch over to e-tendering by 31st December, 2011.

PMGSY – Some Recent Actions Taken 

Uploading of quality Grading of items/sub items and photographs of works inspected by SQMs: 

PMGSY provides a three-tier quality monitoring mechanism



Under the second-tier, periodic inspections are required to be conducted by independent State Quality Monitors (SQMs). Each PMGSY project is expected to be inspected by the SQMs at least three times during the process of execution



All the SQM inspection reports are to be mandatorily entered in OMMAS along with at least 10 digital photographs



Measures to ensure Maintenance Funding of PMGSY roads by States 

Release of Programme Funds has been made contingent upon crediting of required funds to respective SRRDA for maintenance 31

PMGSY – Some Recent Actions Taken (contd.) 

Necessity of Consultation with Hon’ble Members of Parliament for new proposals under PMGSY: Incorporating the suggestions given by Hon’ble Members of Parliament should be an integral part of the preparation of Project Proposals



Necessity of a Transect walk : 

Involvement of the local community in a transect walk can ensure suitable alignment, sort out the issues of land availability etc.



In view of above, a circular has been issued stating that the Project Proposals shall in future be accompanied with following documents: 

Appropriate proof regarding the consultation with Hon’ble Members of Parliament



Minimum of ten photographs taken during Transect Walk



Minutes of meeting after the Transect Walk for each road 32

Major Institutional Interventions  PPP:  States being pursued to adopt PPP in rural roads on pilot basis.  Models on deferred payment, i.e. Annuity basis being explored.  National Consultation planned in February 

GIS:  GIS for mapping of core network on pilot basis.  CDAC to provide technical support  States to implement.

 Independent Engineer:  Deployment of Independent Engineer to supplement third tier.

33

Hill Cutting in difficult terrain Arunachal Pradesh

Bituminous Layer Construction

Maharashtra

Increased Market Access for Farmers

Tamil Nadu

Gujarat

Improved Transport Services Assam

Bihar

Andhra Pradesh

Improved Access to Schools

Assam

Karnataka

Kerala

Improved Access to Health Care

Creating Livelihoods

Gujarat

Roads Built in Forest Areas

Orissa

Nagaland

MP

Mizoram