INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING: A NATIONAL STUDY U.S. Conference of Mayors survey from July 2021 thru January 2022 Comparative matrix - survey results by category vs area and scale of funding in the bills Sixteen areas of investment and their treatment in the pending federal funding legislation compared to local community ratings as determined by U.S. Conference of Mayor's survey
George J Kimmerle, PhD ‐ KG/KNA and The Community Design Workshop
States by region
Highway road
Bridges
5.5 5.8 5.8 6.4 6.2 6.0
5.1 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.8 5.7
Northeast Southeast Midwest Southwest West Averages of all respondents
Survey of US Mayors Council membership from July 2021‐ Jan 2022
Public power Broadband & clean Communication WIFI power 4.2 4.8 5.1 3.8 4.3 5.1 4.4 4.3 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.6 4.6 4.8 5.4
Public water
Healthcare
Emergency services **
Education
Food bank
5.9 5.7 5.8 6.4 6.2 6.0
5.4 4.5 4.1 4.9 5.3 4.7
5.9 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.7 5.3
6.1 4.2 4.4 5.1 4.9 4.8
5.5 3.9 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.4
Recreation ** Flood control 5.1 4.0 3.9 4.5 4.9 4.3
Airport
Public transit
Parking congestion
Housing
4.1 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.8 4.2
5.6 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.2
5.1 4.2 3.9 4.1 4.5 4.2
5.4 4.7 5.0 5.6 5.2 5.2
5.9 5.0 4.4 4.7 4.8 4.7
Ratings of areas of investment by regional identifiers
7 6.41
6.5 6.08 5.91 5.8
6 5.5
6.35 5.81
5.68 5.81
5.85 5.65
5.53
5.44
5
5.59 5.64
5.64 5.4 5.12
5.13
4.5
5.36 5.7 5.13 5.1
4.86
4.62
4.75
4.50
4
4.25
3.5
3.7
6.00 5.84
5.31
5.12
6.28 5.94
5.88
5.12
4.53 4.3
5.52
5.31
4.53
4.81
4.8
4.34
4.03
5.06
4.88
4.97 4.88
5.69
5.50
5.18
5.19
5.12
4.75 4.7
5.81
4.35
4.49 4.56
4.31
3.85
4.72
5.28 5.24
4.95 4.78
4.4
4.19 4.06 4.09
3.9
3.9
5.00
5.36
5.38 5.13
4.84 4.85
4.52
4.78
4.18
4.34
5.41
5.15
5.1
4.64
4.59
4.35 4.25 3.66
4.76
5.69
4.27
3.88
3.84
3
Northeast
Southeast
Midwest
Southwest
West
Averages of all respondents
Allocations by legislation and areas of investment. Comparative to local preferences and their regional ratings.
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS IN 100 bil of dollars Bill 1 ‐ American jobs act Bill 2 ‐ BBB bill
7.000
Highway road
Bridges
6.530 6.530 0.000
1.100 1.100 0.000
Public power Broadband Communication & clean power WIFI 0.650 0.650 0.000
0.250 0.250 0.000
Public water
Healthcare
0.630 0.630 0.000
3.450 0.000 3.450
0.650 0.650 0.000
Emergency services ** 0.000 0.000 0.000 Differed to American Rescue and Recov. Act
Education
Food bank
4.380 0.000 4.380
0.030 0.000 0.030
Recreation ** Flood control 0.000 0.000 0.000 Differed to HR 5378 State and local funding
0.250 0.250 0.000
Airport
Public transit
Parking / congestion
0.250 0.250 0.000
1.050 1.050 0.000
0.110 0.110 0.000
Housing
Cleanup, ports, elec vehicles
State and local aid
Family leave
1.660 0.000 1.660
0.530 0.530 0.000
2.750 0.000 2.750
2.050 0.000 2.050
Child care tax Clean energy credit 1.980 0.000 1.980
5.590 0.000 5.590
Small business, immigration, supply chain and other 1.110 0.000 1.110
6.530 6.530
6.000
5.590
5.590
5.000 4.380
4.000 3.450
3.450
3.000
2.750
2.750 2.050
2.000
1.100
1.100
1.000 0.000
0.650 0.650 0.000 Highway road
0.000 Bridges
Public power &
0.000 clean power
0.250
0.250
0.650
0.000
0.000
Communication
Broadband WIFI
1.050 1.050
0.630 0.630
0.650 0.000 Public water
1.660 1.660
0.000
0.000 0.000 Healthcare
0.000
0.000
Emergency services **
0.000 Education
0.030
0.030 Food bank
0.000
0.000
0.000
Recreation **
Total allocations (100 bil)
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250 0.000
0.000
Airport
Public transit
American Jobs Act (100 bil)
2.050
1.980
0.530 0.110
0.000
0.000 Flood control
1.980
Parking / congestion
0.110
0.530 0.000
0.000 Housing
1.110
Cleanup, ports, elec vehicles
Biden BBB Bill (100 bil)
0.000 State and local aid
0.000 Family leave
0.000 Child care tax credit
0.000 Clean energy
1.110
0.000 Small business, imigration, supply chain and other
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING: A NATIONAL STUDY Do you believe Majority of Role for private Road repair and Bridge a substantial funding occur investment in new reconstruct. investment in at federal or infrastructure construction and public state and local funding replacement infrastructure is level (1) Yes, now (1) Federal, (0) No. warranted? (0) State and (1) Yes, local (0) No.
1.0
0.6
0.7
6.0
5.7
Public power Communication Wireless generation and systems ‐ internet distribution telephone, systems WI FI cable, and locally and cellular systems nationally
4.6
4.8
5.4
Public water including reservoirs, storage facilities and distribution systems
Healthcare facilities and services
6.0
4.7
Emergency Education Food bank and services including Pre K nutrition including First and Daycare Aid, Fire and Policy
5.3
4.8
4.4
Recreation
Flood control and tidal inundation
4.3
4.7
Airport infrast. Public transit Including incl. Hard rail, terminals light rail, bus and jitney and transfer stations
4.2
5.2
Parking structures downtown to control congestion
Housing including affordable, special needs and workforce
4.2
5.2
Overall rankings of all respondents to 16 areas of infrastructure investment 7
6.0
6
5.7 4.6
5
4.8
5.4
6.0 4.7
5.3
4.8
4.4
4.3
4.7
5.2
5.2 4.2
4.2
4 3 2 1
1.0
0.6
0.7
0
Urban‐location healthcare facilities and services
Rural‐location healthcare facilities and services
Financial support for public education
82.4%
78.7%
81.5%
Public parks and Indoor Passive parks Financial playgrounds community including trails support for teen and senior and nature private and centers preserves nonprofit institutions including charter schools
33.3%
87.0%
82.4%
83.3%
Open space acquisition to support all of the options above
Hard Solutions (Dams, levees, and flood gate infrastruct.)
Soft Solutions (Marsh and wetlands acquisition and/or preservation)
Financial Solutions (Buy‐ outs of at‐risk properties and structures in floodways and flood plains)
Hard rail commuter rail and subway systems
Light rail and surface streetcar systems
77.8%
86.1%
76.9%
71.3%
75.9%
71.3%
Affordable Workforce Senior housing Special needs Bus and jitney Terminal, bus housing housing for including systems malls, and other family housing including teachers and assisted living transfer housing for other municipal facilities facilities from developmentally workers one mode of disabled persons transit to another
75.9%
75.0%
88.9%
76.9%
81.5%
88.9%
Overall rankings of all respondents to 19 subcategories of infrastructure investment 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00%
82.4%
78.7%
87.0%
81.5%
30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00%
33.3%
82.4%
83.3%
77.8%
86.1%
88.9% 76.9%
71.3%
75.9%
71.3%
75.9%
75.0%
76.9%
81.5%
88.9%
CASE EXAMPLE - TRANSIT CONNECTIVITY Transit hubs and bus mall demonstration project with recreation and retail/housing component.
Connecting multiple modes of movement, from train, to bus, to jitney, to auto, to bicycles. Model includes: 1. A 450-car parking facility at rail, bus mall, and bicycle storage. 2. Junior and senior soccer fields and field house. 3. Police substation and convenience retail. 4. Public arcade and exhibit space. 5. Affordable/special needs stand-alone housing.
5 4
1 2
3
2 3
4
1 5
2 2
1
CASE EXAMPLE - FREEWAY CAPS Segment 1: South Street south
Segment 2: South St. to Madison Ave.
125,500 SF (2.88 acres)
Segment 3: Madison Ave. to Franklin St.
214,000 SF (4.91 acres)
Segment 4: Franklin St. to DLW ROW
277,00 SF (6.36 acres)
Segment 5: DLW ROW to Morris Ave.
267,000 SF (6.31 acres)
Segment 6: Morris Ave. to Lafayette Ave.
388,000 SF (8.72 acres)
Segment 7: Lafayette Ave north
Recovering what was lost
88,000 SF (2.02 acres)
1899 Aerial Map architecture planning interiors
1109 Mt. Kem Harding Twp 973 538 8885 LICENSE
GEORGE
CT: ARI8 CO: 3059 FL: AR0 010231 IL: 1017 MA: 1034 NJ: AI07 NY: 025 PA: RATX: 1703 WI: 1009 VA: 040 WA: 11
PAUL NE NJ:
11
All drawings a Kimmerle New specified proje reproduced w
Kimmerle Newm revisions
Study Area 1: South Street to Franklin Street
1899 aerial map
1920 Aerial Map
What was lost
no.
date
1
10/20/20
2
11/10/20
Hist
1920 aerial map
Surf Rec Stud date
APRIL 20, 2 scale
as shown drawn by
CASE EXAMPLE - FREEWAY CAPS Provides a means to restore valuable open and green space while adding redevelopment area to the town’s master plan. 1. Park/recreation/ball fields/field house 2. Community/teen center
1
3. Nutrition center/community gardens 4. Tennis courts 5. Green space/public park 6. Office 7. Retail/residential 8. Daycare/Pre-K 9 Surface parking
4 9
5
6 6
7 7
7 7
8
3 2
4
CASE STUDIES: HOUSING ALTERNATIVES Case studies of housing solutions for affordable rental housing, special needs housing and housing in conjunction with transit and medical uses.
Senior, special needs, and dormitory housing plans
Healthcare villages and urban infill solutions
Rental Housing models with affordable housing components
Transit village and mixed-use redevelopment plans
Downtown redevelopment plans including commercial and infill housing solutions
On-campus housing for educational and healthcare institutions