King's College London newsletter
DEFENCE SECRETARY PRAISES McCALL REPORT Reproduced below i a cop of the letter EWCE TRE that the College ha ent in repl to the The Centre for Defence tudie wa official I launched on Monday 29 ctober at King' College London in the pre ence of r Tom King, ecretary of tate for Defence. Attended by a di tinguished audience of p liti ian , defence chief and enior -ivil ervants, proceeding be an in a pa ked Great Hall with the Centre' inaugural lecture delivered by Profe or Lawrence Freedman, Honorarv Direct r of the entre and Profe~ or of ~r tudies at Kin o \.
r ed that i was vital to anchor militarY re pon e to cri e even more firmly to a ' clear et of reali tic political objecti路ves. 'Facin today' complex regional and internati nal cene, defence mu t b c nsidered in the broadet term - and thi i what you can now expe t fr m the ruver It)' f London' Centre for Defence tudie. Following the lecture a recepti n w held in the C uncu R om. Or John Beynon, the Principal, briefly p ke ab ut the new Centre before invitin Or J hn A hwonh, DirectOr of L E and Mr Tom King to say a few word.
Entitled Escalators and Quagmires: ExpectatlOm and the Use ofForce, Pr fe or Freedman ffered an a ademic per pective on the urrent iruation in the Gulf, saying that it had 'become a 'test ca e' of the way we are likely to react to international onflict for many years to come: On recent event in Europe, he argued that 'the collap e f communi m will not automatically usher in an age of peace and harmony, but could well trigger a . erie of local conflict :
The Principal believed the e tabli hment of the Centre within the Univer ity of London was important for a number of rea ons: fir tly it howed that universitie were not ivory tower but part of the real world, secondly, the Univer icy of London' federal trueture provided a unique trength which facilitated collaboration between two internationally renown d depanments - War tudies at King' and
In on ludin , Profe or Freedman
(continued on page 2)
reque t from enate Hou e for a re pon e to the Po ition Paper publi hed inJul. trategic I ue Group: Po ition Paper
[ am writin to let you have the commen of thi C Ile e on the Group' Po iti n Paper. Mr McCall and hi colleague are to be con rarulated on the amount f work that they have d ne in a relatively hort pace of time, and f r bringing a fre h eye to me intractable problems that have plagued me Univer ity for many year . We welcome the general thru t of the Position Paper, but regret that the Group did not start from the po ition of m re overtly considering why the federal Univer ity hould continue to exi t. We believe thi que tion ought to be a ked (and answered) now. There will be many iew , but we give our very briefly below in order that our comment on the Po ition Paper may be seen in a proper context. We believ that the Univer icy of London hould continue to exist primarily for academic reason. Its existence facilitate interaction and co-operation at undergraduate, post raduate and research levels among t the chools who, between them, rep re ent a collective academic trength econd to none in the UK and indeed in the world. But this academic cohe ivene s doe not require a large central bureaucracy; it need little more than an efficient academic regi try, guided by a central academic committee which will, inter alia, establish:
Pictured at the reception to mark the La/Inch ofthe Centre for Defence tudies are (from left to right) DrJohn Beynon, Mr Tom King, Professor Lawrence Freedman and DrJohn Ashworth
(continued on page 2)