4'
-.
4
-
I ~ ~ Q M V Q I **.' ~..+~:S" .
7
Cost h @ f l tnthof p*lom~olof uw
.
.*
b
NO
e
I
-
1;.
rreatment
Farmers Covered
T1 - CO 86032
9
:r c e n ~ wet value Net increase of the produce Return i n 'Iha in yield in Rupees Rupees
BC Ratio
e n g the L
T2 - CO 85019
166.36
136415.20
98773.20
2.62
103320.00
65678.00
1.74
Net Return in Rupees
BC Ratio
132069.20
94427 20
2 51
100933.80
63291 80
1 68
32.03 9
126.00
varieties
I a
ksrssrnml : Sugarcone Variety Co 86032
variety Co 86032 war 2.51 in
Technological intervention
I - 4 '
Assessing the performance of new sugarcane varieties for multi ratoons
Year Mode
2002 to 2003
VT
Treatment
No of Farmers Covered
T1 - CO 86032
14
T2 - CO 62175
Per cent Net value increase of the produce 'Iha in yield in Rupees
Yield
161.06 30.85
7
123.09
) s a m n t : Sugarcane Variety Co 86032
-
tions will be more with the Id of sugarcane. So the weed these 'facts the experiments ield r d c t i o n due to weeds. The rgence application of Atrazine l d j @ . 3 3 U h ~ @ hcbntiol e plot (31.66%). aJi?Z&+F
'
- *;f*i&. :.=* A
4
h
.r=pz; --- -
. c, .- I-/
r*-*xmd .*
Incidence of weed population Incidence of weed population in Percentages TN
Village I
Treatments
Village II
Var-
Village Ill
Madathur
TI
Recommended practice
7.00
8.00
10.00
T2
Farmers practice
30.00
35.00
30.00
1--
sugarcane
2003
T2 - Farmers practice
-
A#.ranent : Sugortane Variety Co 86032
146.53
120154.60
82512.60
2.19
--
--
. lab'
Recommended p~actice:Trash mulching in betwe4af%o r&> Farmers pradice: No tras-hinq ' The treated pJ9Gaye the highest yiilld,"id~fhethm l ~ a t l o nThe r averhe yield of the -. . treated pldwa;l@.96 t/ha arid the control plot wa'r151.92 Mha. ll+ trarhW heckplots gave
.
kqn the mntrol plpts. d2.53bridrtr~@trdfi+saave 2.85. -
! ' 6:62
per &t increa&$ld , .-st+.:
b-
-
3.
;
-5'
intervention
Refining trash mulching pradice in sugarcane
I 1
No of Year Mode Treatment Farmers covered
T1 -
2002 to
OFT
Recommended Practice
1
Per cent
k
r'
L
la
Net value
tlha
in yield
in Runens
132807.20
95165.20
2.53
124566.20
86924.20
2.31
6.62
T2 - Farmers
2003
benefit ratio
yieldincrease of the produce
161.96
9
.
\* . ik rk \
*, uT '% w*'
-
>
n%rsll trash mull
I Technological
I
.
#
~ h trash = - mulehd plod &dst
151.92
practice
I
Reflnemenl : Recommended practice :-Trash mulching in between two rows
Villaae I
Treatments
"
I
I
I
~ara~alavam
Villaae " II Madathur
I
I
I
Village " Ill Naniunda~uram
I
Institute recommended pradice
I
T3
I I
Soil test based recommendation Farmers practice
* The results of the expeh'ments indicated that the soil test based recommendation gave hishest yield in all the t h w I-tions farmers practice. The per cent
when compared with institute recommended practice and e in yield KrAltest based recommendation was 23.41 per
per bent increase than the institute cent than the fseners p r a c t i c = ~ n ds h o w e d ~1. ~ 7
, r
recommendation. The cast b w f i t ratio was hiahest for the soil test based recommendation (2.741 ., followed by ins~&o&endation(2.66)
"
/\-!'Lk
and farmers practice (2.03).
* a
-
-*-
f
pe
@ '
*
Technological
iafMlRetiaa
Year Mode
No of Treatment Farmers 1
Covered
'eld
Per cent Net value Net increase of the produce Return in
'Iha
in yield
in Rupees
Rupees
BC Ratio
I
1 I
I /
(
icai 111 Year Mode Treatment Farmers tlha ion Cnvererl
-
Assessing the performance of sugarcane with
T1 2002 to
YT
Recommended Practice
T2 - Farmers '
practice
15
166.60
136612.00
98970.00
2.63
128936.80
91294.80
2.43
5.95 15
157.24
I .
Rdlnna: h m m m n d e d practice: Suprano intercroppedwfth wnnhmmp
T1
!;I:
T2
169.45
Institute Recommendation
1 Farmers practice
1
151.12
147.30
1
139.73
142.75
1
125.55
I
1
I TI
T2
T3 T4
lnddeare of 816 INB
Contral of Early shoot borer Farmers practice Control of Internode borer Farmers practice
I
WB
the control plot."Likewise thetreated plot of plot. The co**~-n-b-rat~o was hi& for treatmekt
t!v~n he controlblot.
A"
Technological Year Mode Treatment Farmers intervention Covered
I
Refining the 2002 control of early to shoot barer and 2003 internode borer in sugarcane
OFT
T2 - Farmers practice
T1 - Control of internode borer
I I 1- 1 1 I practice
25
4
Ratio
T1 - Control of early shoot borer
T2 Farmers
+
1M.94
Yield tonnes 1 ha
TN
Treatments
Village I
Village II
Village Ill
T1
Recommended practice
171.45
162.30
155.70
I
I
1
I Rhment
T2
I Farmers practice
:R
I
a n d practh :
151.48
I
152.38
dl brrinl stubble rhninpand gap D n g
1
135.45
. .
,
. 'R .
With these a---rirnental results the package of technologies are r e f i n d a s under
Y
$NO 01
I
2
Practice
-
Variety for plant crop
-
--
Co 86032 1 1 3 s .
Variety for ratoon crop
.
L
w
-
-
-4
Co 86032
--
8
.
O L
e .
L
I
-
C
-*
C
-3'
Y - c
L
I
;c,* *
Application of Atrazine 2.5 kg /ha at 3"' day and hand weeding on 45" and 90" day after planting. .
,
- --
I -
/, r
2*
. . - f--\
Trash rnulcnlng in aetween two rows on 5"ay after planting * - # -.-u .tC.. I-.
j
-
Application of fertilizer based on soil test : 310 kg N, 95 kg P and 80 kg K. Full dose of P as basal application, Nitrogen and Potash in equal split at 45" and 90fhday. ressrx
-
w
-4.
'
-
.-,I
~pplication of Phosphorxlcterium 10 kg / ha ana Azospiri//um 5 kg at 30" day after planting and 5 ka A z ~ ~ ~ i r iat l l 60"aay ~ ~ r n after planting.
---
A-A
. *-*.. . .
- A ,
tk-.c
' , n t r o of early shoot borer
+*
#*.
-"-
Irrigating the sugarcane crop at 50 per cent available soil moisture. (36 irrigations) '-em-
-$.a
AppIica+ionof 5Om of indane 20tc mired in 100 litters of water at 30"ay
'
- 1
. +.-
p,l
--*.- a=
b
'w0
Intercropping with sunnhemp and insitu ploughing before flowering.
*
-4
- * '.
+P
%a
.. . . I
---*tYPI.Ac-rr)r-
1-
10
Control of inter node borer
=-I* 1 . '-
'c ,'
C.-
Release of Trichogramma egg parasite 2.5 cc/ha. Six (6) releases for every fifteen days starting from 4" month onwards.
a
& '-,a
.. \
e
WL):
Ratoon management
-
-d ' r
Stubble shaving and off barring within a week
c.
after the plant crop harvest and gap filling at 25 -30 days after planting with
I
pregerminated setts of the same crop.
/ -. I
" The experiments
increased yield
9
demonstrcltedhepossibili~ of will definitely assure the