CGF 6.5 (November 2014)

U.S. Coast Guard Program Updates Homeland Security, Maritime Protection & CBRN Response

Solutions Provider Mark Borkowski Assistant Commissioner Office of Technology Innovation & Acquisition U.S. Customs & Border Protection Protective Coatings O Biometrics CBRN Decontamination O EO/IR

www.CGF-kmi.com

November 2014 Volume 6, Issue 5

KMI Media Group offers ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS and SERVICE OPPORTUNITIES Who’s Who Sponsorships Detailed Organization Profiles Command Profile Sponsorships Q&A with Top-Level Command Leaders Product Profiles Highlight Your Product in the Military Niche Market Business Profiles Custom Materials for Custom Audiences Industry Event Reports Designed Specifically for Your Industry-Focused Event Resource Guides Program Management Updates; Contracts Guides; Products and Services Catalogs; Reference Guides Posters/Poster Sponsorships Agency Timelines; Command/Organization Anniversary Timelines; Message Posters CDs/DVDs Strategically Position Your Promotional CDs or DVDs with a Tip in Disc Carrier

To learn about advertising opportunities, contact Conni Kerrigan at connik@kmimediagroup.com or 301.670.5700 ext. 111

U.S. Coast guard & Border Security Features

November 2014 Volume 6, Issue 5

Cover / Q&A

10

Protection in Layers Marine paints and coatings are a central component of the Coast Guard’s endless fight against the ravages of the harsh saltwater environment.

By Christian Bourge

4

For the Future The Coast Guard’s Acquisition Directorate manages major and non-major acquisition projects and logistics support within three domains—surface; aviation; and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

By Coast Guard Acquisition Office

16 Mark Borkowski

Assistant Commissioner Office of Technology Innovation & Acquisition U.S. Customs and Border Protection

21

23

25

Biometrics

Eyes on the Border

Getting Decon

Searching for the characteristics that allow identification, including a person’s face, fingerprint or the unique pattern of the iris of an eye.

By Scott Nance

Surveillance systems used to secure borders, coastlines and waterways have become remarkably more capable in recent years.

By Peter Buxbaum

With a variety of technology options, selecting the right response for each incident can be a challenge.

By William Murray

Departments

Industry Interview

2 Editor’s Perspective 3 Nav Notes 14 On The Horizon 27 Resource Center

Lucian Williams

President Denso USA LP

28

Targeted circulation reaches decision-makers at all levels of the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S Customs and Border Protection with laser-focused content on acquisition, technologies and solutions.

“Overall, in development and deployment, although the total dollars have actually gone down, we were able to move money to accelerate Texas deployments, which have become a high priority.”

— Mark Borkowski

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

U.S. Coast Guard

& Border Security Volume 6, Issue 5 • November 2014

Dedicated to Those Who Are Always Ready Editorial Editor-In-Chief

Jeff McKaughan jeffm@kmimediagroup.com Managing Editor

Harrison Donnelly harrisond@kmimediagroup.com Copy Editors

Crystal Jones crystalj@kmimediagroup.com Jonathan Magin jonathanm@kmimediagroup.com Correspondents

J.B. Bissell • Christian Bourge • Peter Buxbaum Henry Canaday • Cheryl Gerber • Steve Hirsh William Murray • Scott Nance • Karen Thuermer

Art & Design Art Director

Jennifer Owers jennifero@kmimediagroup.com Ads and Materials Manager

Jittima Saiwongnuan jittimas@kmimediagroup.com Senior Graphic Designer

Scott Morris scottm@kmimediagroup.com Graphic Designers

Andrea Herrera andreah@kmimediagroup.com Amanda Paquette amandak@kmimediagroup.com

KMI Media Group Chief Executive Officer

Jack Kerrigan jack@kmimediagroup.com Publisher and Chief Financial Officer

Constance Kerrigan connik@kmimediagroup.com Editor-In-Chief

Jeff McKaughan jeffm@kmimediagroup.com Controller

Gigi Castro gcastro@kmimediagroup.com Trade Show Coordinator

Holly Foster hollyf@kmimediagroup.com

Operations, Circulation & Production Operations Administrator

Bob Lesser bobl@kmimediagroup.com Circulation & Marketing Administrator

Duane Ebanks duanee@kmimediagroup.com Circulation

Barbara Gill barbg@kmimediagroup.com Denise Woods denisew@kmimediagroup.com Data Specialist

Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) Office of Field Operations is responsible for scanning passengers and cargo transiting across the border using any port of entry—air, land and sea. CBP border agents routinely perform immigration inspections as well the interdiction of contraband, including nuclear and radiological materials.

CBP’s Operational Field Testing Division (OFTD), under the Office of Internal Affairs (OIA), conducts covert operations to test capabilities for detecting and interdicting nuclear and radiological materials at ports of entry and checkpoints, with some support provided by DHS’s Jeff McKaughan Editor Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO).

Thanks to congressional action in the form of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act), a plan was enacted for OFTD to conduct covert operations at the nation’s 22 busiest seaports in fiscal year 2007/2008 to test the interdiction process. Based on results of those actions, and as part of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture Implementation Plan, CBP and DNDO were instructed to conduct at least one joint covert operation each year to maintain and improve the processes in place to detect and respond to a detection of nuclear and radiological materials.

OFTD conducted 144 covert operations at 86 locations between 2006 and 2013.

Between 1995 and 2013, CBP invested more than $2.5 billion to acquire, deploy and maintain radiation detection equipment; provide training; and conduct both overt and covert tests of the equipment to assess the equipment’s effectiveness. OFTD’s budget for covert operations was $1 million for FY09 through FY13 to test CBP capabilities in several areas, including radiation and nuclear detection.

A recent Government Accountability Office report on DHS’s processes concluded that, “To help ensure that resources for covert operations provide reasonable assurance that efforts to detect and interdict nuclear and radiological material smuggled across the border are working as intended and appropriately targeting the most critical materials, locations and detection technologies, we recommend that the Secretary of Homeland Security conduct or use a risk assessment to inform the department’s priorities—related to such decisions as test locations, materials and equipment—for covert operations at U.S. checkpoints and ports of entry in air, land and sea environments.”

While concurring with the report’s recommendations, DHS also explained that a pending transfer of the testing program from OIA to the Office of Intelligence and Investigative Liaison (OIIL) would add greater depth and synergy.

Raymer Villanueva raymerv@kmimediagroup.com

KMI MEDIA GROUP LEADERSHIP MAGAZINES AND WEBSITES A Proud Member of:

Ground Combat & Tactical ISR

Military Advanced Education

Military Information Technology

Military Logistics Forum The Publication of Record for the Military Logistics Community

Technology & Intel for the Maneuver Warfighter

Subscription Information

U.S. Coast Guard & Border Security ISSN 2152-6990 is published six times a year by KMI Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly forbidden. © Copyright 2014.

U.S. Coast Guard & Border Security is free to qualified members of the U.S. military, employees of the U.S. government and non-U.S. foreign service based in the U.S. All others: $75 per year.

Foreign: $159 per year.

Geospatial Intelligence Forum

SPECIAL SECTION: MANNED-UNMANNED TEAMING

UAS Leader Col. Tim Baxter

SPECIAL PULL-OUT SUPPLEMENT USTRANSCOM

Resource Aligner Vice Adm. William A. “Andy” Brown

www.GCT-kmi.com

May 2014

Volume 5, Issue 3

U.S. Army Project Manager UAS Project Office

Deputy Commander U.S. Transportation Command

www.MLF-kmi.com

November/December 2013 Volume 7, Issue 10

Exclusive Interview with:

GAIL JORGENSON Acquisition Director USTRANSCOM

Rapidly Deployable ISR O Tactical UAS O Enduring REF Army Aviation O Wheeled Vehicles O Ammo

www.GCT-kmi.com

Military Medical & Veterans Affairs Forum

Reverse Auctions O Defense Transportation O Afghanistan Retrograde ILS O Supply Chain Efficiencies O DMSMS O Senior Logisticians

www.GIF-kmi.com

Military Training Technology

www.MAE-kmi.com

www.MIT-kmi.com

www.MLF-kmi.com

Navy Air/Sea PEO Forum

Special Operations Technology

U.S. Coast Guard & Border Security

Corporate Offices

World’s Largest Distributed Special Ops Magazine

KMI Media Group 15800 Crabbs Branch Way, Suite 300 Rockville, MD 20855-2604 USA Telephone: (301) 670-5700 Fax: (301) 670-5701 Web: www.CGF-kmi.com

2014

SOCOM Program Management Updates

SOCOM Leader www.SOTECH-kmi.com

Adm. Bill H. McRaven

May 2014

Volume 12, Issue 4

Commander SOCOM

Diver Gear O 3-D Training O Protective Gear Mulltinational Partnerships

www.M2VA-kmi.com

2 | CGF 6.5

www.MT2-kmi.com

www.NPEO-kmi.com

www.SOTECH-kmi.com

www.CGF-kmi.com

www.CGF-kmi.com

NAV NOTES Coast Guard Flies UAS in Arctic Skies Soaring high above the shifting ice and frigid waters of the Arctic Ocean, a silent sentinel patrolled the skies above the Coast Guard Cutter Healy during its journey to the Arctic this summer. While buoys and submersibles collected data from the briny deep, an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) kept vigil in the frosty air.

Scientists at the Coast Guard Research and Development Center (RDC), based in New London, Conn., have a long history of studying UAS for their potential to improve Coast Guard operations. This summer, they teamed with researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and continued their work by deploying a Puma all-environment UAS from the Healy to support their oil-in-ice exercise and evaluate the system’s abilities in the extreme environment of the Arctic.

“UAS technology is already used by NOAA for gathering data and collecting imagery, but this system has rarely been tested in the Arctic,” said Todd Jacobs, a NOAA representative traveling aboard the Healy. “In 2013, we launched a Puma AE from the Healy and tested its flight endurance in cold weather. This year, we developed procedures for landing the system directly onto the flight deck, something that had never before been done on a Coast Guard vessel.”

UAS operators with Aerovironment, designers of the Puma AE, recorded a successful flight deck landing in mid-August and chalked up two additional landings later in the month using a net system custom-built for mounting to the Healy’s bow.

“The Arctic is a cold, dangerous place, and there’s always some risk any time a smallboat crew gets underway,” said Bill Jankowski, an RDC program lead traveling aboard the Healy. “Having the ability to land a UAS aboard a vessel rather than in the water is important because it means crew members don’t have to be put at unnecessary danger by going out to retrieve it.”

The successful landing of the Puma AE aboard the Healy didn’t downplay its role in the RDC’s Oil in Ice Project. Operators also used the system’s infrared and electro-optical camera to provide video of a simulated oil spill and relay data to NOAA’s Emergency Response Management Application, a database used by the Coast Guard and its partner agencies to share information during response efforts.

Ease-of-operation and versatility combined with the stealth provided by its nearsilence and small size could make the Puma AE or similar UAS technologies useful tools for nearly any Coast Guard mission.

“UAS can support anything from migrant and drug interdiction operations to search and rescue, fisheries enforcement or ice recon. It’s a technology with a lot of potential to help the Coast Guard in the Arctic,” said Jankowski. “These unmanned systems are never going to replace our rescue swimmers or our boat crews, but they show a lot of promise in enhancing Coast Guard missions wherever we serve.”

By Petty Officer 1st Class Shawn Eggert

www.CGF-kmi.com

Compiled by KMI Media Group staff

Transition to Practice Program Through the Department of Homeland Security’s Transition to Practice (TTP) program, cybersecurity technologies developed at Sandia National Laboratories—and at other federal labs— now stand a better chance of finding their way into the real world.

Sandia National Laboratories’ Daniel Soh recently provided the Department of Homeland Security’s Mike Pozmantier an overview of the continuous variable quantum key distribution lab.

The innovative TTP program, spearheaded by the department’s Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), helps move federally funded cybersecurity technologies into broader use.

Getting research discoveries and new technologies over the so-called “valley of death”—the gap between early, promising research on one side and technology in use on the other—is a dire need in the national lab community.

“Moving technologies from the laboratory into actual practice is difficult,” said Steve Hurd, a cybersecurity researcher who helps lead Sandia’s TTP efforts. He said one major reason is that technologies that seem to work in the lab might need finetuning or further upgrades in the field.

“So TTP is an inventive attempt to help all the labs improve in this area,” Hurd continued. “It’s paying dividends already by opening doors that will get new innovative cyberdefense technologies from Sandia and other laboratories into the hands of industry, academia and other research institutions that can really use them.”

Coast Guard Incident Management and Incident Action Planning Software System The USCG has identified countless lessons learned, after action reports and memos documenting the need for improved information management during an incident—for example, the reports developed as a result of the Deepwater Horizon incident.

The Coast Guard has identified the implementation of an incident management and incident action planning (IAP) software system as the solution. Some operational units have purchased single-unit licenses for these types of software solutions; the goal of this program is to institutionalize it to an enterprise wide standard across the Coast Guard.

The fundamental goal of the solicitation is to seek a commercial-off-the-shelf software solution to support all functional areas of Coast Guard incident management, IAP development and incident preparedness activities.

The system must be able to manage at least 100 concurrent active incidents across the Coast Guard enterprise at one time.

­CGF 6.5 | 3

Recapitalizing Coast Guard assets to meet mission requirements The Coast Guard’s Acquisition Directorate manages major and non-major acquisition projects and logistics support within three domains— surface; aviation; and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance—to provide operational commanders with the ships, boats, aircraft and systems to meet the service’s current and future mission requirements.

These program updates have been provided to U.S. Coast Guard & Border Protection by the Coast Guard’s Acquisition Office.

SURFACE PROJECTS National Security Cutter (NSC) The Coast Guard is acquiring eight Legend-class national security cutters to recapitalize the service’s 1960s-vintage 378-foot high-endurance cutters and meet its ongoing requirement for cutters with the endurance, seakeeping and multimission capabilities to conduct extended and remote independent operations. NSCs are designed to execute law enforcement, search and rescue and homeland security missions. The NSC’s operational requirements include a sustained speed of 28 knots, a range of 12,000 nautical miles, an endurance of 60 to 90 days and the capacity to accommodate up to 148 people.

The first three NSCs—Bertholf, Waesche and Stratton—have been commissioned and are fully operational. All are homeported in Alameda, Calif. The fourth NSC, Hamilton, was delivered to the Coast Guard on September 15, 2014, and will be commissioned at its new homeport, Charleston, S.C., in December 2014. The fifth NSC, James, is under construction and scheduled to be delivered in 2015. The production contract for the sixth NSC, Munro, was awarded April 30, 2013, and the keel will be laid in October 2014. The production contract for the seventh NSC, Kimball, was awarded March 31, 2014. An option for long lead time materials for the eighth NSC, Midgett, was exercised June 30, 2014.

Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) The Coast Guard has initiated the offshore patrol cutter project to bridge the capability gap between the NSC and the fast response cutter by replacing its 210-foot and 270-foot medium endurance cutters built between the 1960s and 1980s with ships capable of performing the Coast Guard’s missions more effectively. The OPC’s requirements include increased range and endurance; larger flight decks; state-of-the-market command and control electronics; air and surface search radar and target classification sensors; the ability to accommodate aircraft and small boats; and the adoption of technologies to reduce environmental impact while underway.

The Coast Guard is pursuing a two-phase strategy for acquiring the OPC, with preliminary and contract design followed by detail design and construction. On February 11, 2014, the Coast Guard 4 | CGF 6.5

awarded three firm fixed-price contracts for the first phase to Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC (Lockport, La.), Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc. (Panama City, Fla.), and General Dynamics, Bath Iron Works (Bath, Maine). At the conclusion of the Phase I performance period, one contractor will be selected for detail design and construction under Phase II. The Phase II selection decision to a single design will be made after the designs are sufficiently mature to allow industry to submit fixed-price options for ship construction. The Phase II award will include options for production of the lead OPC and up to eight follow-on cutters. In addition, there is a firm fixed-price re-pricing option for two additional cutters.

The phased acquisition strategy implemented by the Coast Guard promotes greater cost visibility for the service and incentivizes cost control within industry by maintaining a competitive environment.

The Coast Guard plans to acquire 25 OPCs. The OPC project is the largest shipbuilding project the Coast Guard has undertaken in terms of total dollar amount.

Fast Response Cutter (FRC) The Coast Guard is acquiring 58 Sentinel-class fast response cutters with enhanced operational capabilities and interoperability; stern launch and recovery of the over-the-horizon IV cutter boat; improved sea keeping; and enhanced crew habitability. The FRC will assume many of the missions carried out by the Coast Guard’s legacy 110-foot Island-class patrol boats.

The FRCs bring additional capabilities to port, waterway and coastal security; fishery patrols; search and rescue; and other missions performed by the older patrol boats. FRCs have a top speed of more than 28 knots, are capable of operating independently for five days at sea, can be underway for 2,500 hours per year and have accommodations for a crew of 22.

To date, the Coast Guard has commissioned 10 of the 154-foot FRCs. Twenty more are on order.

Mission Effectiveness Project (MEP) The Coast Guard recently completed its Mission Effectiveness Project as part of its strategy to manage maintenance costs and reduce lost operational days of the medium endurance cutters www.CGF-kmi.com

and patrol boats awaiting replacement through the FRC and OPC projects.

Made necessary by the degraded reliability of older cutters, the MEP was designed to prevent unscheduled maintenance by upgrading equipment and systems most likely to fail. During the MEP process, the 270-foot Famous-class WMECs, the 210-foot Relianceclass WMECs and the 110-foot Island-class WPBs received new equipment and repairs to increase the reliability and performance of major ship systems.

MEP availabilities included the renewal of cutter decks, living quarters and engineering systems; replacement of tanks, piping and electrical wiring; replacement of hull plating on 210-foot WMECs and 110-foot WPBs; and enhancement of other items, such as refrigerators and air conditioning units, to improve habitability. The refurbishment work was coordinated by the Legacy Sustainment Support Unit at the Coast Guard Yard, Curtis Bay, Md. The Coast Guard completed the last MEP availabilities for the 110-foot Island-class patrol boats in 2012. The overall project was completed in September 2014 with the departure of Coast Guard Cutter Mohawk, the last 270-foot medium endurance cutter to undergo major system enhancements, from the Coast Guard Yard.

In-Service Vessel Sustainment Following on the successful WMEC MEP at the Coast Guard Yard, the service has initiated a project to perform life-cycle event

vessel repair availabilities, including mission effectiveness projects, midlife availabilities and service life extension projects across the Coast Guard’s legacy vessel fleet. The project is designed to ensure in-service vessels meet or exceed their design service life through recapitalizing hull, mechanical, electrical and electronic systems that have been identified as the highest contributors to maintenance costs and decreasing operational availability.

Engineering and planning work has already begun in advance of the planned arrival of 140-foot Bay-class icebreaking tugs, Coast Guard Cutter Eagle and 225-foot Juniper-class seagoing buoy tenders at the Coast Guard Yard. Engineering work for the 47-foot motor life boat fleet is also planned to start in fiscal year 2015.

Response Boat-Medium (RB-M) The Response Boat-Medium is replacing the service’s 41-foot and nonstandard utility boats as the centerpiece of the Coast Guard’s recapitalized shore-based response forces. The 45-foot RB-M is equipped with state-of-the-art marine technology, including waterjet propulsion and integrated electronics that allow greater control from the pilot house. The RB-M delivers boat crews more rapidly and with greater agility to rescue target locations, as well as providing boat crews with a sophisticated electronic command and control suite able to track and intercept targets in all weather conditions. The RB-M also is a safer platform than the boats it replaces, having been designed to decrease crew fatigue on extended patrols.

SURVIVING THE LONGEST NIGHT

They’re coming for you. Just hold on. The deck was under your feet. Then it wasn’t. Sky, water – it’s all black. It’s been 20 hours, but now the sun’s up. They’re coming.

Stay focused. Check your equipment again: seals are good – no leaking from the gloves or zipper, rescue light secure in pocket, pillow inflated. Stay warm. Take some breaths into the suit’s mouthpiece. It’ll circulate warm air to your fingers and toes. They should be close by now.

Wait. There. A ship! It’s getting closer. They’re dropping the rescue boat. They’re coming. You’re going home.

INCREASE THE ODDS OF GOING HOME government@coleman.com I Riika Jorgensen 757-675-9367

®

The warming feature of the I950 Thermashield™ 24+ was tested with the suit, however, it is not part of the certification from the U.S. Coast Guard or the third-party test laboratory, Underwriters Laboratories.

www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 5

The Coast Guard plans to acquire 174 RB-Ms. Today, more than 162 RB-Ms have been delivered to stations around the country.

Deliveries are scheduled to continue through early 2015.

Cutter Boats: Over-the-Horizon (OTH) IV and Long Range Interceptor (LRI) II The Cutter Boats project includes the 7-meter over-the-horizon IV and the 11-meter long range interceptor II. The project will supply each NSC with two OTH-IVs and one LRI-II, as well as delivering cutter boats for other Coast Guard platforms, including the Sentinel-class FRC. The new cutter boats, with speeds up to 42 knots, extend the mission reach of their host cutters, interdicting go-fast targets and delivering Coast Guard boarding teams.

The OTH-IV, with accommodations for five, including a crew of three and a two-member boarding team, is designed to intercept and inspect vessels of interest during counter-drug patrols.

The Coast Guard used an innovative acquisition strategy for the OTH-IV, selecting the winner from a “boat-off” of four competing designs. The Coast Guard may procure 101 OTH-IVs, including additional boats for U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Navy. To date, 39 OTH-IVs have been ordered for NSC and FRC classes. Twenty-two OTH-IVs have been delivered to date, including 13 to the FRC and nine to the NSC fleet.

The powerful LRI-II, driven by twin marine diesel engines and water jet propulsors, is capable of mounting high-speed chases in pursuit of fast-moving targets far from the host cutter. Each LRI can accommodate 15 people. An improved command, control and communications suite helps the boat crews stay in contact with their cutter, Coast Guard aircraft and other assets during operations, particularly migrant interdiction. The lead LRI-II was delivered to the Coast Guard in February 2013 and completed operational testing in June 2013, during which time it played a critical role in an interdiction of illegal drugs at sea. Following that testing, the LRI-II was approved for full-rate production. The first production LRI-II was delivered to Coast Guard Cutter Stratton in July 2014. The Coast Guard plans to procure up to 10 LRI-IIs.

Response Boat-Small (RB-S) II The Coast Guard developed the Response Boat-Small to provide additional maritime safety and security platforms after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The first 25-foot Defender-class RB-S arrived in May 2002, and the service acquired approximately 300. In 2011, the Coast Guard began to recapitalize the legacy RB-S class, which is approaching the end of its 10-year service life with a new procurement, designated RB-S II. The Coast Guard plans to procure as many as 500 RBS-IIs to replace the Defender-class, including as many as 20 boats for CBP and 10 for the Navy. To date, the Coast Guard has ordered 115 RB-S IIs and 100 hulls have been placed into service at Coast Guard small-boat stations around the United States.

AVIATION PROJECTS HC-130H/J Long-Range Surveillance Aircraft The recapitalization of the Coast Guard’s long-range surveillance aircraft fleet will enable aircrews to perform maritime patrols more effectively. The Coast Guard currently operates HC-130H Hercules and HC-130J Super Hercules aircraft, which perform a wide 6 | CGF 6.5

The RB-S II designs are scheduled to follow on to the original RB-S platforms designed after the September 11 attacks. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard]

range of missions, including search and rescue, heavy air transport and law enforcement.

Coast Guard HC-130Js are equipped with a belly-mounted surface search radar, electro-optical/infrared sensor and a mission operator station installed on the flight deck. The Coast Guard has received delivery of six HC-130Js to date, and three HC-130Js are scheduled to be delivered in 2015. Following acceptance, each aircraft will undergo a missionization process to install systems, sensors and capabilities necessary to perform a broad set of Coast Guard missions. The Coast Guard has also received funding for two additional missionized aircraft (HC-130Js 10 and 11) and is working closely with the U.S. Air Force to schedule the acquisition of these new assets. Since its introduction into the Coast Guard fleet, HC130Js have supported Coast Guard mobility and enhanced the service’s capability to perform search and rescue and drug and migrant interdiction missions.

As directed by the National Defense Authorization Act for FY14, the Coast Guard is moving ahead with the planned transfer of seven HC-130Hs to the U.S. Forest Service via the U.S. Air Force. Projects to further enhance the legacy HC-130H fleet have been canceled, redirecting the acquisition project’s focus to the procurement of HC-130J aircraft and mission systems.

Upon completion, the Coast Guard intends to operate a longrange surveillance fleet composed of 22 HC-130Js.

HC-144A and C-27J Medium-Range Surveillance Aircraft The Coast Guard’s medium-range surveillance aircraft fleet is comprised of 18 recently acquired HC-144A Ocean Sentries and 14 C-27Js that will be transferred to the service. The MRS fleet replaces the HU-25 Guardian jet as the Coast Guard’s principal fixedwing maritime patrol aircraft, performing critical maritime domain www.CGF-kmi.com

awareness, search and rescue, law enforcement, disaster response and other missions more efficiently and effectively than the legacy fleet.

The HC-144A Ocean Sentry is powered by fuel-efficient turbo-prop engines and is capable of remaining on station for 10 hours, flying at lower speeds across a wider search area. The Ocean Sentry also is a reconfigurable platform, with a roll-on/roll-off mission system pallet that includes a suite of specialized electronic surveillance and communication equipment that allows aircrews to tie into Coast Guard and joint-force classified tactical networks. The aircraft’s rear ramp allows the cargo bay to be configured for several missions, including maritime patrol, medical evacuation and transport missions.

The Coast Guard’s Ocean Sentries are assigned to four Coast Guard air stations. The service is acquiring a full-scale simulator to enhance pilot training for the new aircraft and its mission systems at the Aviation Training Center in Mobile, Ala. In anticipation of receiving the first C-27J from the U.S. Air Force later this year, the Coast Guard established a C-27J Asset Project Office (APO) at Elizabeth City, N.C. The C-27J APO is developing Coast Guard-specific operational and maintenance procedures, training plans, technical manuals and crew duties and leading efforts to achieve airworthiness certification for each of the aircraft. The C-27J APO will also develop a logistics program, including acquisition of spare parts and plans for training devices, and lead test and evaluation planning as the project transitions from acquisition of the base aircraft to the missionization stage.

The Coast Guard plans to introduce 14 C-27Js into the fleet in the coming years, 13 of which are currently stored in a preserved status with the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Ariz. The 14th aircraft will be transferred directly to the Coast Guard upon acceptance from the contractor.

H-60 Medium-Range Recovery Helicopter The Coast Guard’s medium-range recovery helicopter, the H-60 Jayhawk, has been a workhorse of Coast Guard aviation since the 1990s. The fleet of 42 H-60s recently completed a complex overhaul to address critical maintenance issues. This conversion and sustainment project, performed at the Aviation Logistics Center (ALC), enhanced mission performance and enabled the newly configured MH-60Ts to continue flying through 2027.

The upgrade replaced worn components and systems on the helicopters and added new mission equipment to enhance capability and reduce operating costs. The Coast Guard has equipped its MH60s with airborne use of force capabilities (including ballistic armor, weapons mounts and other modifications). The service has also upgraded the MH-60T with new avionics, an electro-optic/infrared sensor system and other improvements to enable aircrews to locate, identify and track targets day or night in all weather.

With completion of this phase of the project, the Coast Guard has initiated planning for additional upgrades over the next two

Our nation’s heroes sail off into the sunset.

We make sure they return back to port.

www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 7

years to flight planning and navigation capabilities necessary to comply with Federal Aviation Administration navigation performance/area navigation standards.

H-65 Short-Range Recovery Helicopter The Coast Guard’s short-range recovery helicopter, the H-65 Dolphin, first entered service in 1984. These aircraft are deployed onboard multiple Coast Guard cutter classes, as well as serving at air stations across the country. The Coast Guard is continuing efforts to upgrade major aircraft systems and components at the ALC and to extend the assets’ service lives beyond 2027.

In earlier phases of the conversion project, the Coast Guard completed an engine replacement—providing 40 percent more The 42 Jayhawks recently completed a complex overhaul that addressed critical maintenance issues, added new mission equipment and power than the legacy engine—and equipped upgraded the avionics. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard] the helicopters with new electro-optical and infrared sensor systems, as well as airborne use of force kits. lines of bearing to targets in distress. The system also helps idenThe Coast Guard has completed further improvements to 77 of tify hoax calls that unnecessarily divert assets and people from the service’s 99 Dolphins, replacing obsolete cockpit avionics and real emergencies. Rescue 21 is the first part of the Coast Guard’s installing embedded GPS and inertial navigation systems. Following recapitalization of its maritime communications infrastructure at these enhancements, the aircraft have been designated as MH-65Ds. its sector command centers. The Interagency Operations Center In the final phase of the upgrade, the Coast Guard will install project and Nationwide Automatic Identification System will Common Avionics Architecture System (CAAS) cockpit equipment build upon and incorporate Rescue 21’s capabilities to improve similar to that being installed aboard the MH-60T. As the aircraft America’s maritime safety and security. complete the CAAS upgrades, the Dolphins will be re-designated as Rescue 21 now is operational along the entire Atlantic, Pacific MH-65Es. and Gulf coasts of the continental United States, as well as along the shores of the Great Lakes, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Marianas Islands, covering nearly C4ISR PROJECTS 42,000 miles of coastline.

The Coast Guard is currently installing systems in Alaska and Command, Control, Communication, Computers, the Western Rivers (Mississippi, Missouri and Ohio River Valleys) Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance to expand coverage in these areas.

(C4ISR) C4ISR equipment is an important component of the mission capability delivered with all of the Coast Guard’s recapitalized cutNationwide Automatic Identification System ters, boats and aircraft. C4ISR equipment and networks help the (NAIS) Coast Guard collect, process, share and act on information that The Nationwide Automatic Identification System enables the may be crucial to the success of a mission. The C4ISR acquisition Coast Guard to identify, track and communicate with marine vesproject helps Coast Guard and interagency decision-makers build sels using the Automatic Identification System, which is the global in their command centers a realistic common operational picture standard for maritime communications using digital VHF technolof the working environment. The information derived from C4ISR ogy to continually transmit and receive voiceless data, including equipment helps Coast Guard units work more effectively with one vessel location, course and speed. another and partners in other services to save lives, enforce U.S. When combined with other government information and senlaws and provide maritime homeland security. sors, the Coast Guard obtains a holistic view of the arriving ship’s crew, cargo and routing. Equipped with a comprehensive view of traffic on the nation’s waterways, NAIS helps decision-makers Rescue 21 respond to safety and security risks.

Rescue 21 is the Coast Guard’s advanced command, control Since September 2007, the Coast Guard has had an interim and communications system created to assist mariners in distress NAIS capability in 58 ports to receive data out to 24 nautical miles and save lives and property at sea. As the maritime version of 911, from shore. The Coast Guard is currently installing a permanent Rescue 21 helps first responders communicate and work together system capable of transmitting messages out to 24 nautical miles during maritime emergencies. and receive messages from up to 50 nautical miles from shore.

The Rescue 21 system extends communication range to a These capabilities are currently in place at 49 ports and eight minimum of 20 nautical miles from shore and also provides waterways. In the future, the service will extend the enhanced direction-finding capability to direct rescue assets along accurate 8 | CGF 6.5

www.CGF-kmi.com

transceiver capability to an additional nine ports and three critical waterways. The NAIS system currently receives 92 million AIS messages per day from approximately 12,700 unique vessels in 58 ports and 11 coastal areas.

Interagency Operations Centers (IOC) The Coast Guard’s interagency operations centers project has deployed its WatchKeeper software at 37 locations, providing a common maritime security information management system for the Coast Guard in conjunction with a full spectrum of port partners on the federal, state and local levels.

Establishment of IOCs in these high-priority ports was mandated by the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006.

The national security cutters, like the Stratton, represent a leap in capabilities in one cutter over the legacy vessels the class will begin The IOC initiative establishes a nexus for to replace. The multimission NSCs are designed with the endurance and the tools onboard to handle the full spectrum of mission requirements. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard] bringing together maritime security partners to improve the ability to plan, coordinate and monitor daily operations. It provides integrated vessel targeting billets; trains, develops and directs prospective product lines; and to fuse safety, law enforcement and intelligence data with vessel provides logistics subject-matter expertise to acquisition projects. arrival lists, interagency operational planning and operations moniThe APO is currently focused on providing logistics support toring capabilities. Features include an integrated geospatial system plans for critical Coast Guard surface acquisition projects. with weather data and “state of the port” display for daily overviews and multi-agency briefings. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Major Acquisition Systems Infrastructure (MASI) crew, passenger and cargo information, as well as a scheduler to aid As asset delivery schedules and operational requirements in resource allocation, are integrated into the software. require, the Coast Guard’s Major Acquisition Systems InfrastrucAs WatchKeeper transitions from development to sustainment, ture funding ensures that the necessary facilities and infrastrucmaturing the system’s functionality remains a priority. The software ture are in place to support new platforms and mission systems is designed to be a dynamic system that can be upgraded over time when they arrive in the field. Before delivery, the MASI team works so it will not grow obsolete, eliminating the need for an expensive closely with Coast Guard acquisition and logistics professionals to replacement. identify infrastructure needs and prioritize investments in new facilities and facility upgrades to accommodate the boats, cutters, aircraft and mission systems procured by CG-9.

ACQUISITION LOGISTICS Recent and ongoing MASI projects include: The Coast Guard is incorporating acquisition logistics plan• Construction of HC-144A support facilities at Air Station ning into each of its acquisition projects to best prepare receiving Corpus Christi, Texas units for the delivery and support of new assets, including surface • Modifications of piers, support facilities and shore power and aviation platforms and C4ISR systems. Working closely with systems to support FRC homeports at Miami; Key West, Fla.; the Coast Guard’s technical authorities—the Human Resources San Juan, Puerto Rico; Pascagoula, Miss.; Ketchikan, Alaska; Directorate (CG-1); the Logistics and Engineering Directorate and Honolulu, Hawaii (CG-4); and the Command, Control, Communications and Com• Coordination of activities in preparation for the second NSC puters (C4) and Information Technology Directorate (CG-6)—the homeport at Charleston, S.C. acquisition logistics community also assists in the implementa• Construction of NSC and FRC training facilities in Yorktown, tion of logistics policy and supports the Coast Guard’s investments Va., and Petaluma, Calif. in major systems acquisition facilities.

• Conducting engineering studies and analyses for future-year facilities projects to support planning and budgeting for new Asset Project Office (APO) vessel homeports Located at the Coast Guard Yard, Baltimore, the APO’s mis• Modifications to support RB-Ms at Coast Guard boat stations sion is to plan, manage and execute the delivery and transition of nationwide. O newly acquired assets to operational service in the field. The APO integrates major new asset product lines into the Coast Guard’s For more information, contact Editor-In-Chief logistics and service centers. The APO manages the developJeff McKaughan at jeffm@kmimediagroup.com or ment of integrated logistics support plans and products; defines search our online archives for related stories at www.cgf-kmi.com. resource requirements for staffing product lines and associated www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 9

Marine paint suppliers have the Coast Guard covered.

By Christian Bourge, CGF Correspondent the Coast Guard and other military branches battle against the ravages of the sea is a significant challenge. One of a myriad of marine paint manufacturers, both small and large, that serve the miliary and broader commercial market, the 150-year-old U.S.based Sherwin-Williams is a principal supplier to both the Coast Guard and Navy.

“The Coast Guard and the Navy are very good customers, very demanding customers that have very rigid and rigorous requirements,” said Schultz. “And rightfully so—they have valuable assets to protect.”

While there is cross-use of products, Coast Guard needs often differ from those of other American marine armed forces. John Mangano, business development manager for North American Marine Marketing at Rockville Centre, N.Y.-based International Paint—part of the world’s largest paint company, Amsterdambased AzkoNobel—said that operational differences result in the need for different products to meet different strategic needs.

“There is some crossover with (coating) approval, but the Coast Guard does have its own approval process and special needs,” said Mangano. “The Navy doesn’t need icebreakers.”

International Paint supplies the Intershield 300V abrasionresistant pure epoxy coating pigmented with aluminium and Intershield 803 aluminum-free abrasion-resistant pure epoxy coating to the Coast Guard. The paints provide high resistance against Benjamin Franklin famously wrote, “In this world nothing breakage and corrosion to the underwater hulls of the Seattlecan be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” Had he been based Polar Star and Polar Sea 399-foot Polar-class icebreakers in today’s Coast Guard—Franklin is said to have wished to be a as well as the Cheboygan, Mich.-based 240-foot sailor as a child growing up in Boston—he might Mackinaw seagoing buoy tender/icebreaker. have included the unavoidable fact that marine vesThe Coast Guard is also a leader in military coatsels rust. ing technology use. Polysiloxane finish coats have This does not mean that rust from either direct been used by the Coast Guard for years to improve exposure to water and sea air or the related issues gloss and color retention of the familiar white, red of deck slippage and fouling buildup on vessel hulls and blue paints used to makes its vessels readily cannot be mitigated. Marine paints and coatings identifiable. are a central component of this fight for the Coast “Based on the success of the Coast Guard for Guard. years, recently the Navy has started using polysiloxMark Schultz, project development manager ane,” said Mangano. “That was something the Navy for Sherwin-Williams Protective and Marine, told John Mangano learned from the Coast Guard.”

U.S. Coast Guard & Border Security that helping 10 | CGF 6.5

www.CGF-kmi.com

International Paint also provides what Mangano described as “high-end products” for the Coast Guard’s new Sentinel-class fast response cutter (FRC) patrol boats, including its Interfine 979 acrylic polysiloxane finish to protect paint finishes, as well as its Intershield 6GV high-solid-epoxy non-skid deck coats and its Interspeed 640, a traditional copper-based, polish ablative anti-fouling coating to protect the hull from buildup.

Ensuring a Sure Footing Decks and other surfaces, including internal ones, are also subject to the sea elements, not just corrosive effects. The humidity level in the air and sea spray can build up, marring the ability of sailors and craft alike to keep a steadfast footing. While the Coast Guard uses peel and stick materials on its boats, non-skid paints remain a mainstay for wide area use.

Cuba, Mo.-based Bipacco Coatings has been supplying waterbased coatings to the marine industry since 2002, specializing in low volatile organic compound (VOC) products made with nonhazardous raw materials.

“I brought water-based coatings to the marine industry in 1993,” said Bipacco President Tony Brady, whose career in marine paints began with him working offshore for coatings manufacturer Carboline. “The big manufacturers followed afterwards.”

Bipacco offers its Eco-Tred non-skid coating, which is made of 50 percent recycled materials. The water-based acrylic/alkyd resin rubber coating doesn’t contain VOCs. “There are no toxins in it and it lasts long-term,” said Brady.

“You can have long-lasting coatings that are user-friendly and environmentally friendly and are at the same price as their oilbased counterparts. And they are safe to clean up.”

International Paint offers a range of non-skid deck coatings, including Intershield 6GV used on the Guard’s FRCs, which is approved for both Coast Guard and Navy use. Mangano said the coating is the first Mil-Spec Type 5-rated coating that provides high-performing aggressive non-skid and durability. In addition, the low-solar-absorbing, high-volume solids (90 percent) epoxy non-skid deck coating is advertised to offer reduced maintenance costs and increased safety.

Along with its “very popular” Intershield 21, a rapid repair mix kit for direct-to-metal flight deck application which allows for mission use within 18 hours, and Intercryl 588, a water-based acrylic copolymer top coat which helps bring foot-traffic area non-skid back to life, Mangano said the company is awaiting Navy approval for its Intershield 5150LWT epoxy, which is about 25 percent lighter than the Intershield 6GV non-skid and 60 percent lighter than Mil-spec and intended to significantly reduce application weight. He said it is applicable to both aircraft landing and non-landing areas.

“If you can reduce the weight of the non-skid, you can maybe improve fuel economy and speed, especially on these new aluminium-type craft the Navy is building,” he said.

Foulings Abate Anti-fouling marine coatings have long been a central part of ensuring the efficiency and performance of military marine vessels by reducing drag, but have also come up against a great deal of environmental resistance due to the toxic nature of legacy additives used to ensure anti-fouling performance. www.CGF-kmi.com

SeaShield Pile Protection Systems Timber Pile Protection

Steel & Concrete Pile Protection

Series 90

Series 2000HD

Timber Pile Structural Repair

Hydraulic Hoses & Fittings Corrosion Protection

Series 400

Petrolatum Tapes

To Learn More Visit Us At

www.densona.com Call: 281-821-3355 ­CGF 6.5 | 11

Anti-fouling paints come in three basic categories: controlled depletion polymers (CDPs), which use biocides to ensure anti-fouling ability; self-polishing copolymers (SPCs), which neither the Coast Guard or Navy use; and foul-release coatings, which are incredibly slick paints that help ensure biologic and other material does not attach or remain attached to vessel hulls.

While a decades-old technology with a fairly lowtech application, CDPs are considered quite effective in preventing hull buildup. Tin-based CDPs were very effective in preventing fouling development on outer hulls and thereby improving ship performance and durability, but became recognized as not very environmentally friendly and highly toxic to animals, so an International Maritime Organization (IMO) ban went into effect in 2008. The use of copper oxide in CDPs is the current standard. These contain high levels of rosin and similarly work by allowing seawater to penetrate the paint film, resulting in biocide release via diffusion. But there are concerns that the IMO might follow Even with perfected naval architecture, untreated hulls can build up layers that create more and more drag—reducing efficiency and burning additional fuel. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard] the same route and ban them due to environmental concerns.

“We believe this product will allow a wide variance of operational “The Navy, in their wisdom, said that if they can ban tin-conprofile with potentially long periods at idle (a problem seen with taining coatings, maybe they will ban copper-containing coatings, more traditional anti-fouling coatings),” said Preece. “We think it which are the mainstay of today’s anti-fouling coatings industry,” will be a real bonus for the Navy and Coast Guard.” explained Sherwin-William’s Schultz.

Bipacco Coatings also has a foul-release coating in field testing In response, Sherwin-Williams developed—in conjunction with that is based on soybean urethane and uses what Brady, whose daughU.S. Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command and Naval Research Lab ter has been in the Coast Guard for a decade, described as a “special (NRL)—their solvent-based Sea Voyage copper-free anti-fouling pigment hardener” in its fiber reinforcement that is “almost like an coating. He said it is becoming more widely accepted, including iron oxide” in its effect. regular use by the Coast Guard with good success on its aluminum“We are a smaller manufacturer with a lot of technical experhull crafts. Following demonstrations on larger-hulled craft last tise,” said Brady, noting that the company has a coating currently year, approval for use on such vessels is also a possibility. being specified for use on NASA’s Orion deep space crew exploration “It contains several biocides that, while effective in preventing vehicle’s external needs providing protection for a range from the growth on underwater hulls, do not persist in the ecosystem and potentially incredibly hot temperatures of space down to below 200 C. degrade into non-toxic components in about 24 hours,” said Shultz.

“The big guys are buying the little guys, and from what I’ve learned, International Paint takes a different technical approach to the the little guys are able to think outside the box and take more risks.” fight against hull fouling with its Intersleek line of anti-fouling coatings, which include the silicon-based Intersleek 787 and its fluoropolymer-based follow-up, Intersleek 900, both of which have Primed for Protection Coast Guard and Navy approval.

To that end, in 2013, the company launched the Coast Guard Arguably the most essential marine coating is anti-corrosive and Navy-approved Intersleek 1100SR line as a next-generation priming, both for external surfaces and internal areas, including fluoropolymer coating. The biocide-free fouling control coating ballast tanks. For instance, while it is standard practice to apply antispecifically targets slime buildup as well as barnacles and weeds. fouling paint to keep metal-hulled vessels clean from marine organ“If you can reduce the drag of the ship, you can then increase isms and smooth to reduce drag and conserve fuel, it is combined speed or reduce fuel consumption,” said Mangano. “If you reduce with an effective base anti-corrosive coating to ensure effectiveness. fuel consumption, you reduce your CO2. Our Intersleek products In the marine coating market, anti-corrosion paints typically are the only ones that now qualify in the marine market for carbon mean epoxy coatings, including both pure resins and different types credits.” of reinforced resins to improve the paint’s anti-corrosive, antiScott Preece, marine manager, North America, for Denmarkabrasive and hardness qualities with materials, including carbon, based Hempel A/S, a 100-year-old company that has been in the U.S. glass and synthetic fibers. market for around 40 years, said that while it is known primarily as International Paint’s Mangano said the company is currently a commercial marine paint company, its coatings are used by the in the process of gaining Navy and Coast Guard approval of a highCoast Guard. Known primarily for its anti-fouling and epoxy coatsolids version (78 percent) of their Intershield 300V anti-corrosive ings, Hempel has devised a patented new hybrid anti-fouling techcoating used by the Coast Guard. It has a lower VOC content and nology called Hempaguard that combines the characteristic biocide provides high performance at both low- and high-film applications. release properties of CDPs and silicon hydrogel. The company is Developed in response to increased EPA attention to epoxy-coating beginning discussion with NRL about applications. content, the Intershield 300HS is also an aluminum-pigmented 12 | CGF 6.5

www.CGF-kmi.com

coating offering slightly longer cold-weather touchdrying times and similar hard-drying times.

But the anti-corrosive market is much broader than just military spec products, with a host of companies looking to expand the product types used by the Coast Guard. Hempel, which specializes in fiberreinforced anti-corrosive epoxies that take advantage of the much tougher physical robustness they bring to a coating, is one such major player.

“Fibers can be more costly, but their anti-corrosive properties and the number of years they hold up versus unreinforced epoxies is a tremendous boost to end use,” said Preece. “At Hempel, we think the next big benefit is going to come from fiber reinforcement. It prevents cracking, has greater hang ability—you can spray it on thicker—and has great impact resistance.

It is an excellent technology.”

But the greater expenses of such coatings have limited their military use. Preece noted the company is currently reworking their offer with the Navy, which A maritime environment is not exactly the best place for things made of metal. They require constant labor-intensive work and monitoring. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard/by Petty Officer 3rd Class Cynthia Oldham] they’ve worked with in the past, a move that will lead to eventual changes with the Coast Guard. cost of a top coat, for $2 a square foot to come in and prep, prime “Typically most manufacturers, to be competitive, are and apply two coats of a top coat system. It saves a lot.” looking to put their most cost-effective product in front of the Thought not yet on any U.S. miliary spec coatings lists, Griffin Navy or Coast Guard because that will meet the client specificaadded that there are those in the Coast Guard who are familiar with tion,” added Preece. “To my knowledge, no one has put reinforced their offering and that the company has begun to target the U.S. products on the qualified product list. This is one of the areas that military marine market, with small amounts of the primer being I think the military should be taking a look [at].” tested on the USS Enterprise and USS George Washington.

South Carolina-based Grace Distributing has been the exclu“My understanding of the Coast Guard position is if the Navy sive U.S. provider of Norwegian-supplied, Dutch-made LifeGuard approved it, we are gung-ho,” he said. “We just have to wait and see.” base coat primer in the U.S. market since 2009. Offered in Norway Another important area of marine corrosion protection is ballast since 1994, the paint has about a 50 percent market share in the tanks. Schultz said that Sherwin-Williams has been working closely Norwegian commercial shipping industry, according to Grace Diswith the Navy to provide single-coat, rapid-cure coatings that avoid tributing President John Griffin. the need to prime tanks, then strip the edge before the final finish A waterborne 2 percent VOC acrylic copolymer universal is applied. This three-coat process can take a number of days due to primer, LifeGuard’s application to a vessel is different than other curing times. The company’s Fast Clad ER paint, an edge-retentive, primers in that it begins with less than the traditional full abrasive ultra-high-solid low-VOC epoxy amine coating, provides immersive blasting, instead using ultra-high pressure water jets as the paint protection for ballast tanks after only 24 hours of painting a single adheres very tightly to rust and existing paint. coating. Developed with the Navy, the technology has been trans“The obvious advantages are when you can pressure wash ferred to Coast Guard use. instead of abrasive blasting—when I say that, I mean 7,000 pounds Looking forward, the company is developing a version of the per square inch (PSI) to 10,000 PSI versus 30,000 PSI to 40,000 paint that uses optically active pigments to provide easy visual PSI—we can come across a barge or a Coast Guard vessel along inspections. Currently in prototype form and being developed in the side,” explained Griffin. “It’s basically like getting routine conjunction with the Navy and Naval Research Labs, the goal of the maintenance done in a very effective manner and at far less cost.”

R&D project is to have a coating change color as a function of film Along with the lower labor cost resulting from the need for thickness, moving from translucent to opaque with a color shift in less intense blasting, Griffin noted that this is done at virtually any real time as the applicator is spraying the coating. location and does not require transport of the vessel to a specific Although they are still working out the specifics, the idea is facility. In addition, the cost of cleaning up and disposing of abraproviding the ability to use the naked eye or a visual tool both the sive blast material is mitigated, as the customer only potentially applicator or QA/QC inspectors could use to ensure film quality. has to pay for the easier job of capturing water in the area around “You could do a visual inspection rather than going around a the vessel. tank or whatever spec with a dry film fitness gauge and having to Although LifeGuard cannot be applied underwater and would take hundreds and/or thousands of readings with a mechanical tool,” require dry docking for application below a vessel’s water line, said Schultz. “A visual inspection would be much faster.” O Griffin said the cost to the customer is much less than the industry standard of $4 to $6 per square foot.

For more information, contact Editor-In-Chief “We’re fast and spend less labor than traditional methods,” said Jeff McKaughan at jeffm@kmimediagroup.com or Griffin, whose company recently began offering coating services search our online archives for related stories at www.cgf-kmi.com. along with the product. “We can do a top to bottom job, minus the www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 13

ON THE HORIZON CBRN Sampling Sets In response to the call for need as outlined in the Dismounted Reconnaissance Sets, Kits and Outfits (DR-SKO) requirement developed by the JPM-Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Contamination Avoidance and approved by the JPEO-Chemical and Biological Defense, QuickSilver Analytics, Inc. (QS) has been selected to provide integral CBRN sampling and supplies for inclusion into the overall system.

In a statement, the company said, “With over 20 years of experience in the CBRN

analytical and sampling arena, it is with great pride that QS accepts the opportunity to provide support to the program through their extensive knowledge and expertise with regards to expendables, supplies, sampling and support. This collaborative effort that has been in progress for years and has recently (March 2014) been approved for full-rate production. Initial delivery to the U.S. Navy was in September 2014.”

The need for a standardized set of reconnaissance equipment that addresses the full

Explosive Trace Detector Marking a major milestone for the company, Implant Sciences, a high-technology supplier of systems and sensors for homeland security and defense markets, has recently completed the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) qualification requirements for aviation checkpoint and checked baggage screening certification process for its QS-B220 desktop explosives trace detector.

The QS-B220 becomes the first ETD with a nonradioactive source to be added to the TSA’s qualified product list (QPL).

“The addition of the QS-B220 to TSA’s QPL is the single most significant achievement in our company’s history,” stated Implant Sciences’ President and CEO, Glenn D. Bolduc. “We’re very proud to be able to deliver this innovative product for the protection of travelers in our country. Every member of the Implant Sciences team has done a phenomenal job of getting us to this point. We would also like to recognize the support we have received from our shareholders and other investors over the last few years while we have been pursuing this most significant qualification. Without their support this would not have been achievable.”

The QS-B220 uses Ion Mobility Spectrometry to rapidly detect and identify trace amounts of a wide variety of military, commercial and homemade explosives. Featuring a radioactive material-free design, push-button maintenance and diagnostics, and a patented inCal internal automatic calibration system, the QS-B220 brings new levels of performance and convenience to desktop trace-detection users with unsurpassed ease of use.

14 | CGF 6.5

CBRN spectrum to be deployed to warfighters in the field that was consistent and sustainable is an issue that has emerged within the past decade. The solution was realized through the system of the DR-SKO development.

The selection of system components, which was spearheaded by a team of scientists, engineers, logistics specialists and program analysts from within the JPM, was focused on a broad range of criteria indicative of the type of environment that would be expected by the military.

Securing the Cities Program The Department of Homeland Security recently announced the expansion of the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office’s (DNDO) Securing the Cities program to the National Capital Region, further building upon the department’s ongoing efforts to raise the nation’s capabilities to detect and protect against radiological and nuclear threats. The Securing the Cities program seeks to lessen the threat posed by dangerous radiological or nuclear materials against major metropolitan areas in the United States by establishing sustainable capability among state, local and tribal agencies to detect and report dangerous radiological and nuclear materials within their jurisdictions.

“Expanding the Securing the Cities program to the National Capital Region, New York City and Los Angeles and Long Beach is another step in our efforts to raise the nation’s capabilities to protect against catastrophic threats,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. “This program is a key part of the department’s efforts to enhance the capability of all our partners to detect and interdict dangerous radiological and nuclear weapons or materials in major metropolitan areas.”

This is the third implementation of the Securing the Cities program.

The program began in 2006 as a pilot project for the New York City region and expanded to the Los Angeles/Long Beach region in 2012. The Department plans to expand to additional cities in the coming years.

As part of the Securing the Cities program, the District of Columbia’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency will receive a direct grant of up to $30 million over five years, beginning with $6 million in 2014. The funding will allow the district to work with partners in the National Capital Region to build a robust, regional nuclear detection capability for law enforcement and first responder organizations. Initial efforts will focus on analyzing the region’s current capabilities and planning for post-program sustainment activities.

DNDO will also provide equipment and assist regional partners in conducting training and exercises to further their nuclear detection capabilities and coordinate with federal operations. At the conclusion of the program, DNDO will continue to support the region through activities such as alarm adjudication and by providing subject-matter expertise in the areas of training, exercises and technical support.

www.CGF-kmi.com

Compiled by KMI Media Group staff

Snowmobiling

Coastal Interceptor Vessel

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Border Patrol Sault Sainte Marie Station has a requirement for snowmobiles to support operational patrol requirements across extremely rugged terrain.

A contract was recently awarded to BRP US Inc. for six snowmobiles to “fill a critical need and increase the unit’s capabilities for conducting operations in areas that are difficult to access using conventional methods. The power needed must be able to transverse any terrain challenges and provide a persistent climb when engaging mountainous terrain.” The station’s current inventory is aging and this requirement will assist in revitalizing the unit’s current snowmobile assets in order to maintain a high degree of effectiveness and operational readiness.

According to the solicitation, the snowmobiles had to be equal to, in all material aspects, the 2014/2015 Polaris Switchback 600 Adventure snowmobile.

The Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has announced its intention to issue a solicitation with full and open competition for the procurement of the coastal interceptor vessel (CIV). The anticipated period of performance will be for a base year commencing around January 1, 2015 through December 30, 2015 and four 12-month option years for up to 52 vessels.

The CIV will serve as a maritime law enforcement vessel that will transport and employ U.S. CBP marine interdiction agents (MIA) for a variety of missions. In particular, the CIV will provide the CBP MIA with a versatile, multimission platform to perform their duties and missions while operating in littoral waters and in offshore areas of the United States and its territories in varying sea and weather conditions.

Missions include patrol, interdiction, special operations and port security support.

The CIV will provide the space and configuration to transport and employ a number of mission-specific payloads, including CBP mission systems; support the tactical movement of MIAs for mission operations; and support the pursuit of suspect vessels for the purpose of boarding, searching, and, when necessary, arresting violators and seizing the vessel and/or contraband. The CIV shall be capable of law enforcement operations that include performing high-speed maneuvers and turns in close proximity to other vessels.

The CIV hull is comprised of a deep-V mono-hull designed for high-speed, openocean transits and should be based on a mature parent hull, following best engineering design practices engineered with a service life of at least five years.

Anti-Exposure Suits The Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection and the Office of Air and Marine (OAM) are responsible for the interdiction of illegal contraband and persons, and serve as the first line of defense against terrorism. Based on the ever-changing law enforcement operational environments encountered by DHS/CBP Marine Interdiction Agents, the issue of proper law enforcement safety equipment is vital to OAM. OAM has recently recognized inventory laws with regards to a vital piece of law enforcement equipment and must purchase additional Mustang deluxe antiexposure suits. This suit is used by marine personnel operating OAM vessels during adverse conditions.

This suit is designed with the Comfort Cuff technology, which creates a relaxed and comfortable fit, along with Tug-Tite technology Velcro wrist and ankle closures that improve fit and limit water flushing if immersed. Additionally, the suit has two chest pockets, two large front cargo pockets and an inflatable head pillow for additional in-water support and buoyancy, and utilizes closed-cell foam, which offers floatation and hypothermia protection in the event of water immersion. As well, this suit has SOLAS reflective tape, which enhances visibility; moreover, this suit blends functionality and features that meet and, in some cases, exceed the demands of a wide range of professional (law enforcement) and industrial uses while protecting the wearer from extreme weather.

www.CGF-kmi.com

Principal particulars are as follows: Length overall

40-43 feet

Beam maximum

9 feet 6 inches – 12 feet 3 inches

Draft maximum

36 inches

Range

350 nautical miles

Speed

54 knots

Propulsion

4 x 300 HD Mercury Verado outboard

Crew capacity

Shock-mitigating seats for 4

Maximum vessel height on trailer

13 feet 6 inches

Construction material

Aluminum or fiberglass

Standards

American Boat and Yacht Council, International Organization for Standardization

­CGF 6.5 | 15

Innovation Provider

Q& A

Providing Maximum Innovation, Technology and Taxpayer Value Mark S. Borkowski Assistant Commissioner and Chief Acquisition Executive Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition U.S. Customs and Border Protection Mark S. Borkowski became the assistant commissioner for the Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition (OTIA) with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in July 2010. He is responsible for ensuring technology efforts are properly focused on missions and well-integrated across CBP for strengthening effectiveness in acquisition and program management. In addition to being the assistant commissioner for OTIA, Borkowski serves as CBP’s component acquisition executive responsible for ensuring acquisitions support a mission requirement, are cost-effective and are integrated across all of CBP where appropriate.

Prior to his appointment as assistant commissioner, Borkowski served as executive director of the Secure Border Initiative (SBI) Program Executive Office (PEO). As executive director, he oversaw the Department of Homeland Security’s implementation of SBI at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and oversaw SBI’s continued efforts to develop border security resources that will provide enhanced situational awareness for frontline CBP personnel along the U.S. borders.

Before assignment to SBI, Borkowski served as the executive director for mission support at Headquarters, United States Border Patrol. In this role, he supported the chief of the Border Patrol in executing the Border Patrol’s $2 billion annual budget and in managing a total workforce in excess of 17,000 agents and support personnel. He oversaw functions of workforce management, labor and employee relations, finance, logistics, recruitment, training, facilities, and tactical infrastructure. As a DHS Level III certified program manager, he provided expert advice and support to the chief of the Border Patrol with respect to the technology program within SBI, SBInet. Borkowski directed a contracted effort for organizational development to redesign and transform the Border Patrol to respond to an unprecedented growth in the organization driven by presidential mandate. His division staff included 75 personnel assigned to six separate geographic locations. Prior to his appointment as executive director of mission support, Borkowski served as director for asset management in CBP’s Office of Air and Marine.

Before joining CBP, Borkowski was the program executive for the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program in the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD) at NASA headquarters. In that role, he oversaw the development and operation of robotic precursor 16 | CGF 6.5

missions to the moon as stage-setters for eventual human missions.

Previously, he served as the assistant deputy associate administrator for development programs in the ESMD. Borkowski assisted the deputy associate administrator in overseeing the technology, development and acquisition programs to implement the President’s Vision for Space Exploration. He also served as the program executive overseeing the Hubble Space Telescope Robotic Servicing and De-orbit Mission and as the ESMD coordinator for NASA’s Exploration Transportation Strategic Roadmap.

Borkowski served over 23 years on active duty in the United States Air Force, retiring at the rank of colonel. His last assignment in the Air Force was as system program director for the SpaceBased Infrared Systems (SBIRS) program office. In that capacity, he oversaw satellite programs worth over $40 billion, including the Defense Support Program (DSP), SBIRS-High, and SBIRS-Low. During his Air Force career, Borkowski also served as the support group commander at Eglin Air Force Base; the chief of the Programming Division at Headquarters, Air Force Materiel Command; the assistant chief of staff at the Ballistic Missile Defense organization; and in a variety of other staff, acquisition and engineering positions. Borkowski elected to decline an offer of promotion to brigadier general and to retire from the Air Force in 2004.

Borkowski has a master’s degree in astronautical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology and a master’s degree in national resource strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed www.CGF-kmi.com

Forces. He also has bachelor’s degrees in aeronautical engineering from AFIT and in mathematics from the State University of New York at Albany.

Borkowski has certification from both the Department of Defense and DHS at the highest level (Level III) for acquisition management.

He has won numerous awards, including the Air Force Association, Lieutenant General John W. O’Neill Outstanding System Program Director Award; the Company Grade Officer of the Year and the Manager of the Year Awards from the Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory; the Air Force Systems Command nominations for the “Ten Outstanding Young Americans” award; several military medals and decorations and civil service performance awards.

Q: Looking at your budget requests, it looks like you could see an increase over fiscal year 2014 dollars.

A: There are some increases in our budget compared to prior years—just a slight increase.

Our budget is broken into two basic parts. One is called development and deployment, and the other one is called operations and maintenance. In the past, we’ve been funded for the development and deployment of technology largely in the Arizona Technology Plan: the integrated fixed towers, the remote digital surveillance systems, the mobile surveillance capability and the mobile video surveillance system.

There’s also been money in there for technical communications upgrades. We’ve used funding to accelerate some deployment of technology to Texas. With the funding requirements for Arizona now covered, we were able to allocate funds elsewhere.

Overall, in development and deployment, although the total dollars have actually gone down, we were able to move money to accelerate Texas deployments, which have become a high priority.

Our operations and maintenance account, which covers the systems we’ve bought—keeping them fresh, working and repaired— has gone up. As you can imagine, as we’ve deployed more technology, there has been higher demand for additional operations and maintenance.

Regarding the current presidential budget request, the feedback we’ve received has been pretty positive. We’re optimistic about that part of our budget.

There’s also been continued discussion about the supplemental appropriation with some congressional interest in technology, centering on whether or not there’s going to be additional opportunities for funding and additional opportunities for acceleration of some technology deployment.

Q: Do you have any latitude in moving monies between those two segments of the budget?

A: Within each of those areas, we have very limited latitude. We have very small amounts of money that we’re allowed to move and generally

PML7033-2 Rev(14.0)

THE ULTIMATE PATROL OPTIC © 2014 Trijicon, Inc.

Wixom, MI USA

Trijicon_USCoastGuard_PML7033-2 Rev(14.0).indd 1

www.CGF-kmi.com

1-800-338-0563

www.trijicon.com

7/29/2014 10:01:09 AM

­CGF 6.5 | 17

only with congressional approval. When it’s in the operations and maintenance account, I typically cannot use it for development and deployment, and vice versa.

Q: Going down into the budget, looking at FY15, a couple of programs seem to stand out: the remote video surveillance systems (RVSS) and mobile video surveillance systems (MVSS). Can you touch on each of these programs?

A: The RVSS and the MVSS are exactly what I talked about for accelerating the technology deployments to south Texas—those are the priorities of the border patrol in Texas. We’ve been in the process of awarding contracts for remote video surveillance systems and the mobile video surveillance systems as part of the Arizona Technology Program. When developing those contracts, we wrote flexibility into them to give us a head start in Texas as well.

Because we have that flexibility and because of the emphasis on Texas, we have the ability to act more quickly than if those contract vehicles had not been written that way.

Q: And the status of those contracts?

A: The remote video surveillance system contract is on contract. That contract covers the buying and hanging of the cameras and the sending of the camera signal back to a command center.

In addition to that contract activity, we have to have towers or locations to put those cameras. While we have the contract vehicle to buy the cameras, the long lead is the activity to find the build sites, get environmental approval for the towers and construct them. We don’t have those contracts, but we are in the process of preparing the groundwork for them.

The contract for the mobile video surveillance system was recently awarded for an initial quantity of four, but has the capacity to buy almost 100 if there is additional funding.

While the contract was recently awarded, unfortunately there has been a protest. Interestingly, this protest is on different grounds from most others. The contract was a small business set-aside, which means only small businesses were eligible for this award. After we awarded it, some of the unsuccessful bidders protested on the grounds that they don’t believe that the winner is a legitimate small business. The Small Business Administration is currently sorting through that; we’re waiting to hear their answer.

Q: In general, is the contracting and acquisition process that you have to work within as streamlined as it could be, or do you see opportunities to improve?

A: I think there are. I think the contracting system is very slow and there’s a reason it’s slow. We have to start by understanding that.

It’s very frustrating, it’s very unwieldy, and it’s very bureaucratic.

But, to be fair, let’s start off by explaining why.

These are taxpayer dollars. I once had a CEO in my office explaining to me that he had a great system and he didn’t understand why it took so long to just buy from him. I told him that if I could make the decision to just buy from him, I could make the decision to give a contract to my mother.

These are government dollars; these are taxpayer dollars. Every legitimate business has to have the opportunity where they can compete for those dollars—that, by itself, creates a certain kind of 18 | CGF 6.5

bureaucracy and a certain kind of rigor that frankly is very, very slow.

Can it be streamlined to some degree? It can be. But we have to understand that there’s always going to be a certain amount of delay because it’s taxpayers’ money and the taxpayers have to be assured that that money is being spent properly, there’s no nepotism involved, there’s no favoritism involved, and the competitions for that money are fair.

Having said that, there are some things we need to look at. We tend to do things in series. By that, I mean we sit and consider what we want and need, and then we figure out how we are going to get the necessary budget. So you have several months to almost two years to figure out what you need. Then you have to get that into the budget process; that’s another one or two years. Then you can release a request for proposals. That’s another one to two years to contract award. The serial nature of the system is a big part of the problem.

We’re trying to figure out how we can get ahead of that serial nature and do things in parallel—and sometimes the way you can do things in parallel is by putting flexibility into the contract vehicles you have. For instance, the Arizona contract vehicles give us a little flexibility for a head start in Rio Grande Valley.

We’re starting to see some success with changing the way we buy things in the first place. We’re not trying to do system development here—we’re trying to buy nondevelopmental items. It turns out that that’s a lot different from the way we’ve bought things before. We go out and we say, “Look, I’m interested in systems that have these general characteristics, but I’m not going to tell you that you absolutely have to see 10 miles or you absolutely have to be all-weather. I’m going to tell you I’m interested in all those things but I’m willing to trade how much of it you can do for me against the cost and the schedule you offer me.” I’ll make those trade-offs for the sake of getting something more quickly and with lower risk.

Another thing that bites us in the acquisition process is that once we award the contract, things don’t work out the way they were supposed to. We find that the rocks are harder than we thought they were digging through. Every problem costs time. We’re trying to reduce the likelihood of those problems by having more confidence when we actually make the decision to buy. That also streamlines the process. But when you allow suppliers to present what they have rather than ask them to design something they don’t have, that has some potential for streamlining the process as well.

Q: Meaning more nondevelopmental items?

A: Not only nondevelopmental items, but a significant change in the way we define the specifications and requirements in the actual solicitations. We’ve put a lot of flexibility into those and said if you’re Acme Technology Company and your system has 90 percent of what we’re interested in, we’d like you to bid. Depending on how much you cost and how much you can accomplish compared to others, you might actually be the best bang for the buck.

When you do that, you end up with a tremendous number of bidders, which became one of our challenges. We had to evaluate all the bidders, which cost us some scheduled time. But having a tremendous number of bidders allows really good, difficult decisions to be made in terms of costs and benefits.

It’s like buying a car. I can go get the luxury car or the compact car. I’ll buy the luxury car if it doesn’t cost much more, but if not, I’d like the opportunity to buy the compact car if it does the job.

You also bring in different parts of the industry, people who in the past would not have been able to bid on something where you www.CGF-kmi.com

had very rigid requirements and where you said, “If you can’t do all of this, don’t bother bidding.” You end up with different companies who come into play. When you get that kind of competition with that number of companies, you can tell the bidders, “You don’t need to over-promise, just tell me what you can do. I’m not asking you to promise anything beyond.” It also reduces the risk downstream when you actually go to build things.

We’ve had some success with this approach; doing more looks very promising to us.

In the past, we’ve had some issues with Congress and others because we were so late in getting our request for proposals out and then in completing the source selection and making the contract award. But frankly, those were decisions that I elected to make in the hopes that they would reduce the downstream risk at the cost of the current schedule. We’re starting to see evidence that it pays off.

It’s still too early to declare victory, but it looks promising.

Q: And you’re not just talking about upfront acquisition cost when compared to the long-term sustainment cost.

A: Exactly. That’s the classic cost of development and acquisition compared to the cost of operations and support.

I’m talking about the schedule and cost of actually conducting the source selection. Go back to the SBInet experience. We awarded that contract and were supposed to have it deployed in a few years.

I think the contract started in 2006, and by late 2010, we started to deploy the first small area of the border. The border was basically supposed to be complete by then under the original contract.

I’m talking about cutting the risk once you’ve awarded the contract.

Q: Let’s go back to the Arizona Technology Plan. What are the lessons learned from that approach to doing business?

A: First of all, it appears to save a lot of money. Everything that we have awarded on that Arizona Technology Plan has increased competition, increased opportunity for other businesses to get into it and reduced the risk of ultimate systems deployment. We learned all of that.

The other thing that we did was, and still is, controversial.

Imagine that I have a menu of technology options. I’ve got complex, extensive systems like integrated fixed towers and then I’ve got more simple systems like tripod-mounted cameras, tripodmounted radars or unattended ground sensors. I’m buying all these disconnected systems and then someone says, “Well, wait a minute, don’t you have to tie all those together in some kind of common operating picture?”

The approach we took was, “No, we’re not going to worry about that.” What we really need is a basic technology out there. When we have the technology deployed, let’s let the demand for tying those systems together come as a natural result of operating them. We’re starting to see the benefit of that.

If you go back to the early SBInet days, they had already designed the towers, the cameras, the radars and a rudimentary command and control system—and had deployed nothing. We hadn’t deployed anything at that point. The reason we hadn’t deployed anything was that we had big money set aside to continue to develop a common operating picture, which was a central connection of all these systems. As a result, we hadn’t put up any of this technology. www.CGF-kmi.com

I remember standing under a tower at a test facility with the thenchief of the Border Patrol and thinking, “We got all this designed and ready to go, but because we’re waiting on the common operating picture to tie it all together, we haven’t deployed squat in all this time.”

So I turned to the chief and I said, “Chief, would you rather I take the money and put up these towers or continue to operate and build the common operating picture?” And he looked at me and said, “Mark, to tell you the truth, we never wanted the common operating picture.”

That’s the reason we took that approach. There was a whole new technology and the Border Patrol was comfortable saying, “Okay, look, just give me all the technology. I will manually connect it. I’ll look at three different screens. I’ll figure it out.” The other advantage of that is if you build the integration as a result of that Border Patrol experience, the Border Patrol was sitting there watching these systems and asking, “This is getting complex. Can you put system A with system B?” At that point, you have a tightly defined requirement to put those two systems together. If you do what we were doing at SBInet and say, “I’m going to build the common operating picture to end all common operating pictures,” the development could never end.

In other words, there’s not really a firm demand for it, so what are the real needs instead of the perceived needs? So we wait for the Border Patrol to come in and tell us specifically what they want us to do, which turns out to be a relatively straightforward, simple process.

This whole technology of common operating picture and technology and sensor fusion has evolved over these years, so there are things the Department of Defense has built that we can probably use as-is without any further development.

Industry is aware, of course, that we are deploying all these devices and eventually are going to want to connect them. Well, what does that cause industry to do? That causes them to say, “I’ve already got something for you; let’s talk.”

By putting more of that into small, bite-size chunks, it allows us to get incremental deployments of technology. We didn’t have one big drop. We had incremental deployments.

Q: You mentioned surplus or redundant equipment from DoD and taking advantage of those opportunities. Tell me more about that.

A: There have been tremendous opportunities and we’ve been taking advantage of them. It’s everything from night vision goggles to advanced radar systems. We’ve received thousands of items from the Department of Defense. We have a very good relationship with various program offices in the Department of Defense and tremendously strong support from senior DoD leadership, which has broken down bureaucratic barriers from time to time.

We have thousands of items, from small to complex, but some of the most visible things are the aerostats. These were the same systems deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. A couple of years ago, I was talking with some of the folks at DoD and they said, “You know we’ve got this stuff coming back and I think it’ll be declared excess. Are you interested in it?” We said, “Absolutely.”

Something important to remember is that while I may not have to pay to buy the system, I do have to pay to operate and maintain it.

Remember I told you how my operations and maintenance budget is going up to support that technology?

In a way, it was sort of a gutsy move originally to say we took this DoD equipment because we did not have that support funding through the budget. I remember having discussions with the leadership here and they said, “But Mark, we don’t have this budget.” And I ­CGF 6.5 | 19

said, “I know, but I think it’s worth the risk.” Because all I have to do is pay to ship it and store it until we understand it better. And I don’t want to lose that opportunity.

Worse comes to worse and we decide that we cannot afford to operate it at steady state, at least we have access to it in the event of an emergency. That’s better than not having it at all.

The aerostats looked very promising; you can think of them as really high towers. We have five deployed now down in south Texas.

They are doing wonderful things for the Border Patrol and giving them inside situational awareness and response flexibility that they’ve never had before. Keep in mind, the way our plans and budgets were going, we really didn’t think we were going to have much technology into south Texas until 2017/2018.

The aerostats come in three basic sizes: small, medium and large.

We have acquired and stored eight of the small aerostats.

To go forward, we need to to figure out how everything all fits into the steady state. As you can imagine, that’s an initial shot in the arm which isn’t necessarily optimized or built to the right cost estimate.

Part of the effort is to evaluate all those systems so that we can figure out how they all play together when we get into a more balanced, long-term plan. But in the meantime, there is technology in areas where we weren’t going to have technology for years.

Q: There’s been a lot of talk about agent-mounted cameras. Are you looking into that technology?

A: CBP is broadly studying whether that makes sense to us. There have been no conclusions yet that it does, but we’re certainly aware of some of the technologies and are looking at the potential to pilot some of them.

Q: You have articulated the importance of understanding and communicating with industry to better understand what they can offer in terms of meeting CBP requirements.

A: In our case, one of the reasons that my office was established was to create a fairly simple entry point for people who needed one. We understand that it’s sometimes difficult for outsiders to understand how to do business or how to at least get a foot in the door to talk to someone at DHS or CBP. That was one of the purposes of creating the Office of Technology, Innovation and Acquisition.

Even though we’re not necessarily the end decider or end executor, we are an entry point for anybody, and we can take care of getting people to the right place. To this day, I still schedule for anyone who wants an opportunity to come in and talk and tell me what they have.

If I’m in town, I typically have one of those meetings a day. There’s a queue and I’ve been doing this for years.

Sometimes they want to hear from us; they may not necessarily have anything but they want to hear us talk about our mission and our issues. Sometimes they want us to give them feedback. A lot of times, we’re just having brainstorming conversations.

When we bring that information in, my office then sponsors, on a quarterly basis, a session with representatives of our end-users, our operators, the Border Patrol, office field operations and the office of Air and Marine, and we share everything we saw. When our operators see something of particular note, we try to use some of our resources to run at least a little bit of a pilot so that the vendor and our operators have the opportunity to see if this could be something that they could do.

20 | CGF 6.5

We have tried larger forums where we put together panels of our operational folks to talk about what they’re thinking among industry leaders. We actually sponsored one of those, and have run a number of panels over the past two years.

Industry liked it quite a lot. They gave us some feedback and said, “It was great, but you crammed a lot of information in there and the panels were all diverse because their missions are so diverse.” They suggested doing something smaller and more focused on a quarterly basis. We were in the process of planning those and then sequestration hit. We’re in the process of figuring out if we can redesign those sessions and get them started back up.

I’m trying to find other mechanisms for other opportunities for industry, in addition to flexibilities in the federal acquisition regulations or flexibilities in the law.

I tell people in government that innovation is a war of attrition.

The other thing that we’ve done very successfully was an initial industry day for the RFP, a full day of activity really trying to emphasize that this is nondevelopmental and what that meant. Then, before we issued the RFP, we invited anybody who was interested to come and talk to the team that was building the RFP. My team met with people from industry so that we could make sure they understood what we wanted, and it also allowed them to suggest to us better ways to write the RFP. We spent a long time doing that. That was another reason the RFP was delayed. I thought it was time well spent.

Q: Is there anything else you’d like to add?

A: You focused pretty much on the operational/technical part of the mission, which is: We’ve got an assignment to buy specific things.

But we also, as an office, are responsible for tightening up the rigor and the discipline for the acquisition process writ large. That means writing policy, establishing policy, encouraging innovation, covering innovation and covering risk-taking.

We do a great deal of that. It’s a lot less visible compared to awarding a contract and putting up a tower. DHS and CBP, as they grow, have increasingly recognized that this is a difficult business that requires a certain set of skills that have to be cultivated.

There are some people who think if you’re a good leader, you can do anything. That’s not really true. If you’re a good leader, you can lead, but if you don’t know how to do acquisition, you can lead people into a disaster. We spend a lot of time on that part of the activity and we’re making progress.

Our title has innovation in it and it’s interesting to watch innovation, it’s interesting to see panels and speak on panels about innovation. I think there’s a kind of view in government that innovation means using mobile technology. But if you really study innovation, that’s not what it really means at all.

Innovation is about culture change and change management and the ability to see opportunities to do things in a different way.

It’s not about the gadget; it’s about the application of the gadget in a way that enables different things to be done, new things to be done or old things to be done in a significantly better way.

That actually comes from working-level people. My experience has been that innovation doesn’t come from the leaders; it comes from the working-level people. But they don’t innovate if their culture and their leaders don’t support it. That’s the ‘I’ in OTIA. We are also spending a lot of time trying to be thought leaders in innovation and we have a lot going on there as well. O www.CGF-kmi.com

Searching for the characteristics that allow identification.

By Scott Nance CGF Correspondent

been used with paper and ink by the FBI and The Department of Homeland Secuthe law enforcement community.” rity—and its U.S. Customs and Border ProOf the various types of biometrics—fintection (CBP) component in particular—is gerprint, iris scan and others—Hutchinson eagerly embracing an increasing use of said that he sees a lot of potential for facial biometrics, encompassing a class of techrecognition. nologies that identifies and authenticates “I think one of the modalities that you’re individuals based on an electronic scan going to see a lot more frequently is facial of personal characteristics such as one’s recognition, because it’s already printed on face, fingerprint or the unique pattern of credentials and folks can also take a look at an eye’s iris. that in addition to the machine looking at The developers and manufacturers of it,” he said. biometric systems are just as eager to provide the cutting-edge tools required to meet this emerging and growing need, executives An Important Tool for a at these companies said.

New Mission “We see a very bright future for the biometric industry in those [homeland secuThe mission to monitor the entry and rity and border security] applications,” said exit of individuals to and from the United Mohammed Murad, vice president of global States was transferred to CBP in May 2013 sales, marketing and business development and “we really embraced that new misat Iris ID Systems, a biometrics provider sion space,” said Colleen Manaher, executive based in Cranbury, N.J. director of planning, program analysis, and The accuracy of biometric systems has evaluation for the Office of Field Operations “improved greatly” over the past 20 years, within CBP. according to Ben Hutchinson, senior director for federal programs at MorphoTrust, a Billerica, Mass.-based biometrics technology company.

“There is a lot of accuracy,” he said. “Fingerprints and face are probably the two most prolific biometrics. Iris is the most accurate, but it’s not widely implemented. Fingerprints are the gold standard. They have been around for almost 100 Ben Hutchinson Colleen Manaher years if you count the way they’ve www.CGF-kmi.com

The fervor that CBP brings to its new role is leading to a “transformative effort” involving a wider use of biometrics at an array of different U.S. border crossings, Manaher said.

“What we’re finding now that we have this new entry/exit mission is that we needed a strategy that can not only deploy some of the cutting-edge technologies in biometrics but also look at the fusion between biographic and biometric [information],” she said. “I think that is critical as we move forward, that fusion of biographic and biometric.”

That includes, for instance, supplementing existing systems at the nation’s airports by “evaluating emerging biometric technologies,” she added.

Such a system would build upon the use of fingerprints—but also could well go beyond them, Manaher said.

“The fingerprint sort of represents our law enforcement foundation—how we interact with the FBI and how we interact with the law enforcement community,” she said.

“But if you were to add the additional identity biometrics—which would be face-[recognition]-on-the-move [or] iris-[recognition]-on-the-move—you can imagine the transformative properties of such a deployed system, even at an airport.”

CBP plans this year to deploy experiments in mobile biometric use in an airport setting, Manaher said. In the next 12 to 18 months, CBP will be ­CGF 6.5 | 21

doing some “amazing experiments” in facial recognition, she added.

“As we start to look at the flights that are departing from the United States, we’ll actually start to fuse both biographic and biometric information on a mobile biometric [device],” she said.

CBP also plans to experiment with biometric systems on the southern U.S. border with inbound pedestrian traffic at Otay Mesa, which is one of three points of entry between San Diego, Calif. and Tijuana, Mexico, Manaher said.

In these tests, the agency plans to deploy face-recognition-on-the-move and iris-recognition-on-the-move technologies, she said.

“We’re going to be experimenting with each and every one of those biometrics to see what works, especially in the land border environment,” she said. “Also, at some of our airports … we’re going to start to look at facial recognition. We’re so excited about facial recognition that it’s an additional tool for us.”

Manaher cited work at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a federal agency within the Department of Commerce, which found that facial recognition technology today actually is “a little bit better” than a human being in terms of recognizing and identifying human faces.

“Now [facial recognition systems] don’t measure the intent [of a given individual], which is always what we need an officer to do,” she said. “But can you imagine if we could get the facial recognition out and deployed to all of our ports?”

A ‘Really Great’ DHS Biometrics Laboratory In the longer term, CBP will be working with the science and technology component of DHS, which operates a “really great facility” in Landover, Md., Manaher said. “They’re testing all sorts of what we consider longterm biometrics solutions,” she said.

One of the technologies being worked on at that lab is what Manaher termed “fingerprint-on-the-fly.”

“You just wave your hand, and it grabs your fingerprints,” she said. “It has such transformative value, I wish it was available today to deploy at all of our ports. It would cut down our process time because, right now, the taking of fingerprints is quite intense in terms of the process time.

“They’re looking at iris-on-the-move, and how and where would be the best place to 22 | CGF 6.5

deploy a biometric exit solution. Is it at the airport gate? The jetway?” she added.

Such a system would be “very transparent to the traveler,” Manaher said.

“If we were to deploy that, say at a jetway, can you imagine the future?”

Not Only Entry, But Exit, Too

a known traveler to me at that point,” she said. “It’s a game-changer, if you see what I’m saying. We’re very excited about what we’re doing.”

The Biggest Challenge: Technology or Policy?

Biometrics technologies will continue to become smaller, faster, cheaper and more A key aspect to the CBP mission will be reliable, Hutchinson said. not only to track individuals entering the “The real power is going to be the conUnited States, but also eventually to track vergence of all of the screening, enrollment those leaving the country as well. and maritime interdiction with the large“Part of our mission is now exit, or deparscale, back-end multimodal systems,” he ture, control. It’s been on the books for quite said. “That’s where you get the real power, some time to deploy an efficient and effecwhen you have a lot of data-sharing; when tive exit-control solution using biometrics,” you have the ability to reach back into these Manaher said. databases and make those connections.”

Although Congress and a number of Robert Wallace, president federal agencies have talked and CEO at BithGroup Techabout the need for an exitnologies, a Baltimore, Md.tracking system since the terbased biometrics provider, rorist attacks of September said he sees other emerging 11, 2001, “it’s just never been technologies. implemented,” said HutchinThey include “gesture son of MorphoTrust. recognition,” an electronic “When you leave the means of monitoring peocountry today, you typically ple’s gestures as they move have the airline checking the through a given area to watch passport and there’s no real Robert Wallace for gestures “that are out of control over who’s leaving the the norm,” he said. country,” he said.

They also include signature verification A biometric-based exit system today and voice biometrics, the ability of a system would be valuable, for instance, to track to verify a person’s identity through speech, U.S. citizens who may be traveling to Iraq Wallace said. and Syria to participate in the deadly ter“Those are some of the [technologies] rorist groups which have sprung up there, that I think that are emerging that could Hutchinson said. very easily be implemented at a borderIn the past, the primary roadblock to the control-type area,” he said. deployment of a comprehensive, national However, all of these systems would biometrics-based exit system was its cost, require huge databases to compare a given he said. biometric to in order to make an identity “Today, the prices have dropped dramatmatch, Wallace said. ically and that’s really no longer a concern,” “That’s going to be the biggest challenge, he said.

I think. It’s not so much the technology, in As part of its exploration of biometrics, my opinion, that is the impediment—it’s the CBP will, by 2016, deploy “a full-blown, societal acceptance of allowing ourselves to operational” biometric system to track outbe documented in this way,” he said. “How bound travelers “at a major airport” as a quickly we adopt these policies and techfirst step, Manaher said. nologies will be a function of our national Manaher described the example of a visiresponse or national concern about terror tor from Ireland departing the United States and our fear of terror. That could really accelwho has had his or her fingerprint and iris erate the acceptance factor.” O images already captured for biometric identification.

That visitor would “go transparently For more information, contact Editor-In-Chief Jeff McKaughan at jeffm@kmimediagroup.com or through the iris-on-the-move, [so] the next search our online archives for related stories at time [they] fly I have that fusion of biowww.cgf-kmi.com. graphic and biometric, [and] you’re almost www.CGF-kmi.com

Technology has increased the fidelity, range and capabilities of electro-optic sensors.

By Peter Buxbaum, CGF Correspondent

to alert the operator that something has happened in a particular Surveillance systems used to secure borders, coastlines and frame.” waterways have become remarkably more capable in recent years.

Border and maritime security systems all include several basic Sensors that weighed in the thousands of pounds have been reduced elements, noted Gordon Kesting, vice president for homeland secuto little more than a dozen pounds, allowing for greater flexibility in rity solutions at Elbit Systems of America. “Sensors do the detection their deployment. of people, objects and events,” he said. “These then must be identiElectro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) camera combinations, which fied, whether it is a human or an animal, some kind of conveyance facilitate day and night viewing of areas of interest, now provide or something else such as an ultralight aircraft. Then they must be 360-degree panoramas of the areas they are helping to protect. classified to determine the level of threat, whether what has been Advanced algorithms and data processing assist systems operators by detected is friendly or hostile, [in order] to determine the existence identifying potentially problematic persons, objects and situations.

EO/IR systems that are geospatially enabled are sometimes and the nature of illegal activity or a threat situation. Then you want to track any detected activities to understand the progress of referred to as radar, not because they emit a signal like traditional any movement.” radar, but because they can pinpoint objects of interest and direct the The systems must also include a communications element so that attention of operators to a specific point on a map. Traditional radar data can be transmitted back to a command center. “That is where systems are often also included in border and coastline protection operators work the system and can view the information being transsolutions. mitted in a common operating picture,” said Kesting.

“We have made great strides with size, weight “They typically view information on digital maps and can and power (SWaP) management and with the use that information to determine whether a response is miniaturization of sensors,” said Frank Purdy, called for and resolve any incidents that they pick up from vice president of corporate engagement at Logos the system.”

Technologies. “A system that once weighed 1,500 “Operators are often covering a 100-square-kilometer pounds has been reduced to 15 pounds.” footprint on the ground,” said Purdy. “It is not possible “We have taken a single thermal sensor and we for anyone to process all the data that could be derived spin it in such a way that it can gather images from from that expanse of territory. It makes sense that you a 360-degree field of view,” said Michael Dortch, need some algorithms to stabilize images and to identify chief technology officer at Thermal Imaging Radar human and vehicle movements. Our customers are able (TIR). “It is continuously refreshed at the rate of Frank Purdy to observe areas and targets of interest in real time as well 30 to 60 revolutions per minute depending on the as go back in time to analyze incidents forensically.” camera, which creates a near real-time 360-degree Thermal systems work particularly well in maritime panoramic view of the area under observation.” environments, noted Dortch, because water is a fairly “Our EO/IR radar systems utilize different algouniform surface from a temperature standpoint. Thermal rithms for detections of people, aircraft and other systems work by contrasting objects based on their heat objects depending on the environment where it is profile against a background. being deployed, whether it is air to air, ground to “Both radars and cameras have some capabilities of ground or ground to sea,” said Dave Port, director identifying and classifying objects,” said Kesting. “Radar of marketing at Controp USA Inc. “The systems is able to detect sufficient features to help identify an allow operators to choose a field of regard, whether object. Classification is generally left to the cameras. They that is 360 degrees or some more limited area. provide a higher level of detail required to classify a target Once the stabilized head scans the selected field, Gordon Kesting and assign a threat level to it.” the systems use pixel change detection software www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 23

Radars now often stare at narrow areas of interest instead of scanning over wide areas, noted Kesting. “This provides much higher levels of reliability and lower false alarm rates,” he explained. “There are fewer detections but these have a much higher probability of being activities that operators want to focus on. Commercial maritime radars have been adapted in maritime applications for over-the-water detection. When those are coupled with complex algorithms, they provide a good detection and tracking capability in high-clutter environments. When wide area surveillance is called for, you need radar to provide that wide area of coverage and then train a camera on items of interest based on what the radars are detecting.”

Elbit Systems won a solicitation earlier this year from the Department of Homeland Security for its Integrated Fixed Towers program.

A protest by a non-successful bidder stopped work on that project for several months. That protest was recently dismissed and Elbit was given the go-ahead to continue work on the system, which will provide surveillance at the Arizona border with Mexico.

The term radar, as it is applied to EO/IR systems, is something of a misnomer. “We call it radar because the system is geospatially oriented,” said Dortch. “We go through a complex calculation that calculates the depth value for all imagery so that we can pinpoint the source of an alert in three-dimensional space. We can put a red dot on a map to indicate the location of a person, object or incident. But unlike conventional radar, there are no active emissions. Operators can view alert locations on a map which is represented in a box on the 360-degree screen.” TIR has been awarded a patent for its system and has nine other patents pending.

“EO radar is similar to conventional radar in that the sensor will scan 360 degrees and automatically detect pixel changes as it comes around again,” said Port. “Conventional radars put a signal out 20 miles and try to pick up everything of a certain size. We allow operators to choose their own geographical segments and ranges according to the area [they are] operating in.”

The detection alarm that goes off in Controp’s systems is a visual alert with a box drawn around a questionable frame while an audible alarm draws the operator’s attention to that area. “Rather than providing a ping on a radar screen, we give the operator a visualization, a picture image of what is going on at distances upwards of 12 kilometers on the ground and five kilometers in the water,” said Port. “We use specific algorithms based on whether the systems [are] scanning ground, air or sea.”

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has deployed the Controp systems for border protection, as have U.S. special forces in Afghanistan for protecting forward-operating bases. Internationally, they have been installed in many countries, including Italy, Singapore and Israel.

Logos Technologies offers a system called Kestrel for border protection and another system called Skua for waterways and ships. “The hardware included in both of these systems is commercial off-the-shelf technology,” said Purdy. “What makes our products work is the integration of those sensors, which is an engineering feat, and what makes them think is the processing of the data so that operators can harvest actionable information for their piece of the mission.”

The processing aspect of the system Purdy terms “our secret sauce” and is patented. “Image stabilization is a fundamental piece of the processing,” said Purdy. “This allows real-time processing of the data at the sensor or elsewhere, whatever is in the best interests of the mission.”

The Kestrel system collects everything within its field of view with EO/IR sensors. “Kestrel is recording and analyzing every pixel and 24 | CGF 6.5

takes measurements that define what a potential threat would look like,” said Purdy. “Skua, because it is focused on the water, operates with a different set of phenomenologies and doesn’t image everything.

Instead, it detects changes through an algorithmic process and brings these to the attention of operators. If a pirate ship were coming out of nowhere, Skua would detect it at enough of a range to give operators the ability to maneuver away from it or take action against that particular threat.”

Kestrel has been fielded in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2010. Skua is a pedestal-mounted system operated from shore and has been demonstrated to the U.S. Navy.

“Right now thermal radar needs to be stationary in order to be geospatial,” said Dortch. “There has been some interest in the Department of Defense for a geospatial capability on the move. We are working on developing such a capability so that its system could be installed on vessels. The system is lightweight and portable so that it can be stored on a vessel for when it is needed.”

Thermal radar is generally installed on top of a pole at a pier, harbor or border area. “Border security is where we shine,” said Dortch.

The company is in the process of setting up a large demonstration of the system for the Department of Homeland Security. TIR has won several awards for its surveillance system, including an award for security invention of the year from “Popular Science” magazine.

Future border and coastline security systems will likely include ever-smaller sensors, greater levels of automation and more sophisticated data processing capabilities. “We are spending quite a bit on the further miniaturization of our sensor systems in order to improve SWaP options for our customers,” said Purdy. “We are also making some internal investments on how surveillance systems can operate autonomously onboard power parafoils.”

“Our research and development includes continuing advances to radar systems and cameras,” said Kesting. “We also continuously look at ways to automate systems and make them as operator-friendly and useful as possible.”

Controp is working on adapting its systems to aerostats and unmanned aerial systems. “Aerostats hovering at 1,000 feet can provide a wider area of regard,” said Port. “We are developing a highly stabilized 4-inch EO/IR camera with a laser pointer which could be suitable to aerostats and UAVs.” Controp is working with manufacturers of both of these kinds of vehicles to integrate their sensor payloads.

“We are also developing an even smaller micro EO/IR sensor with a continuous optical zoom that could be suitable for mounting on a UAV for perimeter and port security,” said Port.

Logos Technologies is in the process of developing a new version of Kestrel which would go beyond EO/IR detection to become a multimodal sensor payload. “The sensor will be able to process all of that data in real time,” said Purdy, “and present it to operators in the form that they wish.”

Logos is also allocating its R&D dollars towards developing more sophisticated data analytics capabilities. “Sensor data could be combined with data from other sources relevant to a particular problem or mission,” said Purdy. “In addition to sensor system data, we will find other relevant data and present all relevant data sets to analysts.

We are spending our internal research dollars on understanding large data sets and how they relate to our customers’ areas of interest.” O For more information, contact Editor-In-Chief Jeff McKaughan at jeffm@kmimediagroup.com or search our online archives for related stories at www.cgf-kmi.com.

www.CGF-kmi.com

Speed and ease of setup emerge as key CBRN decon needs.

William Murray, CGF Correspondent

For first responders decontaminating a scene, exposure to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) elements presents significant danger since first responders are at risk of being contaminated, and contaminated individuals entering a hospital can shut down the facility.

Removing hazardous material generally takes the dedication of skilled personnel, time and the proper equipment.

First responders are looking for mass decontamination products that they can quickly set up and use and expand if necessary, according to Ron Nolting, vice www.CGF-kmi.com

president of Hydro-Therm Inc. of Cumming, Ga. A high-pressure power washer with three nozzles that operates on a 2.5 inch discharge, their system can operate a five-person shower to remove contaminants in a controlled environment.

The Hydro-Therm Trident One, a mass decontamination shower system, can deliver a low-pressure, high-volume water shower producing a wall of water using patented telescoping arms and three 150-gallon-per-minute nozzles. For a water source, the system is connected directly to a fire hydrant through a standard adapter, according to Nolting.

Risk to Skin Cell death may take place in individuals with high doses of CBRN exposure, while lower radiation doses and exposure to chemicals may result in changes in cellular function.

Quicker response times for mass decon systems are key, according to Amit Kampoor, president of First Line Technology LLC of Chantilly, Va., who launched the company in 2003. “They want to set up in a more expedient way,” he said. A smallbusiness supplier, First Line’s products are ­CGF 6.5 | 25

sold through GSA Schedule contracts and other contractual vehicles.

Concerned about the waste resources generated by a wet CBRN decon solution, Kampoor’s company sells a dry decon wipe to first responders, abandoning the company’s previous practice of selling tents and shelters for mass decontamination.

First Line markets its wipe as a one-timeuse product that users can then throw away. In addition to selling Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL), First Line produces FiberTect, a dry decon product featuring a three-layer, flexible, drapable, non-woven composite substrate for absorbing chemical warfare agents, toxic industrial chemicals and pesticides.

Not all vendors agree on the merits of dry decon solutions. “It takes a lot of water to clean up powder,” said Adam Havey, executive vice president of the BioDefense Division at Emergent BioSolutions of Rockville, Md. “We haven’t done any experiments with dry solutions,” he said.

Havey noted that some powder-based dry decon solutions could be blown away in a windy operational scenario when minutes and response times count and confusion and missteps may cost lives.

“Trends we’re seeing are that the customers are looking for (decon) products that can reduce time and energy,” Havey said. His publicly-traded company’s individual use decontamination packet, RSDL, is a sponge-based product with an active ingredient. Sold in individual packets, RSDL can handle all conventional chemical warfare decon threats to people, according to Havey, including tabun, sarin, soman, cyclohexyl sarin, nerve agent, mustard and T-2 toxin.

He contrasts RSDL with older, water-based mass decontamination products, which he claims are less effective.

Emergent BioSolutions officials are seeing an increased demand for the product, particularly among first responders and foreign military, according to Havey.

The Joint Service Personnel/Skin Decontamination System (JSPDS) is a system developed in conjunction with the Department of Defense for decontaminating the skin of warfighters exposed to chemical warfare agents. JSPDS consists of RSDL and Training RSDL, according to Meko Neri, an Emergent BioSolutions spokesperson. “Training RSDL is a lowercost, inert version of RSDL used as an RSDL simulant in training scenarios,” she said.

26 | CGF 6.5

DoD officials approved Emergent BioSolutions-supplied RSDL and Training RSDL as the material solution for JSPDS in 2007. Since then, Emergent BioSolutions has provided RSDL to every uniformed military service, including the National Guard and Coast Guard. Several other federal agencies, such as the State Department and FBI, also provide their employees with RSDL. “Further, within the Coast Guard, RSDL is a component to an egress kit which allows Coast Guardsmen to safely exit contaminated vessels,” Neri said.

On the dry decon solution side, First Line Technology also sells a reactive skin decontamination lotion that users exposed to chemical warfare may apply, according to Kampoor. It is very difficult for many border patrol agents, first responders and military personnel to go to a central location after a CBRN incident, so a mass decon product like a shower set up in a central location doesn’t work well for their needs, according to Kampoor. Border patrol agents in the Southwest, for example, sometimes patrol hours away from their central duty office, given the length of the U.S.-Mexico border.

“They want you to keep it simple, easy to use and deploy,” Kampoor said of first responders, border patrol agents and military personnel.

DRS Technologies Inc., a subsidiary of Finmeccanica SpA, headquartered in Arlington, Va., provides a 526-lb. version of its Joint Service Transportable Decontamination System-Small Scale (JSTDS-SS), a self-contained unit that can work with water as hot as 175 degrees Fahrenheit, while a more lightweight, more expeditionary 320-lb version can heat water up to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. According to Jim Fritts, senior program manager at the company’s Environmental Systems business in Florence, Ky., the JSTDS-SS fits on a flatbed truck and is operational by a two-person team in less than 90 minutes.

The JSTDS-SS is designed for a thorough decontamination of non-sensitive military material, limited-use logistics bases, airfields, naval ships, ports, key command and control centers, and other fixed facilities with exposure to CBRN agents, contamination and toxic industrial materials, according to officials at DRS. In requests for proposals, federal buyers are looking for less expensive mass CBRN decon products, according to Kampoor. “They’re looking for smaller form factors that are more effective” in large-scale

procurements, he said. “They want it in a smaller package that can cover a larger area.” They also want both bio and chem treated in one package. He noted that there’s been consolidation among First Line Technology’s decon competition in recent years.

“Eighty to 90 percent of contaminant can be removed from a person by disrobing after the accident,” Hydro-Therm’s Nolting said. “It contains the incident,” which is very critical if a person feels a burning sensation in his skin during a CBRN incident, he said. Fire departments, emergency management and hospitals, including military ones, are primary users of Hydro-Therm’s Trident One. The system sends out a wall of water 30 feet out towards the contaminated individuals. The heavy spray is likely to remove the remaining contaminant from them, according to Nolting, whose company has helped many hospitals become decon-compliant. Such a deluge of water, known as gross decon, is a good tool to use while formal decon response is prepared, according to Nolting.

After all, Nolting pointed out that if 2,000 people have been decontaminated by CBRN, some or all of them are likely to die if they have to go through a lengthy line in a formal decon response. “If there are 2,000 people effected by decon, you can’t run them through a line,” Nolting said.

“They would die.”

Hydro-Therm charges about $3,600 per unit for Trident One, and the product is on the authorized equipment list for sourcing products for the military. According to Nolting, Veterans Affairs hospitals and all branches of the military, in addition to county emergency management agencies across the country, have purchased Trident One for rapid delivery of water in a short period of time during a CBRN incident.

Vigilance is the key for border patrol agents, first responders, hospital staff members and military personnel, who may one day encounter a CBRN incident.

“There’s no crystal ball telling what could happen,” Nolting said, reflecting on the unpredictable nature of CBRN incidents, which first responders, military and border patrol agents are trained to respond to. O

For more information, contact Editor-In-Chief Jeff McKaughan at jeffm@kmimediagroup.com or search our online archives for related stories at www.cgf-kmi.com.

www.CGF-kmi.com

This index is provided as a service to our readers. KMI cannot be held responsible for discrepancies due to last-minute changes or alterations.

USCGF RESOURCE CENTER Advertisers index

Calendar

Agustawestland Spa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C4 www.agustawestland.com

November 19-20, 2014 Launch & Recovery Linthicum, Md. www.navalengineers.org

April 21-22, 2015 Border Security Expo Phoenix, Ariz. www.bordersecurityexpo.com

December 3-5, 2014 International Workboat Show New Orleans, La. www.workboatshow.com

June 8-11, 2015 National Homeland Security Conference San Antonio, Texas www.nationaluasi.com

Denso North America Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 www.densona.com Fairbanks Morse Engine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 www.fairbanksmorse.com Stearns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 www.stearnsafety.com Trijicon, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 www.trijicon.com

March 4-5, 2015 ASNE Day Arlington, Va. www.navalengineers.org

June 23, 2015 Mega Rust Newport News, Va. www.navalengineers.org

NEVER STOP LEARNING Considering a new degree? Searching for a new career field? Advising your troops on their education options? You need Military Advanced Education’s 2014 Guide to Colleges & Universities!

Check out the searchable database at www.mae-kmi.com for the details prospective students and advisors are looking for!

• Access all the survey answers from the hundreds of schools that participated in MAE’s 2014 Guide to Colleges & Universities • New and improved design makes it easier than ever to find what you’re looking for • Search the database by school name, state, online or brick-and-mortar schools • Compare and contrast institutions with all the info MAE used to score and designate our top schools

www.CGF-kmi.com

­CGF 6.5 | 27

INDUSTRY INTERVIEW

U.S. Coast Guard & Border Security

Lucian Williams President Denso USA LP Q: Can you give me some examples of the kinds of new products you are experimenting with?

Lucian Williams is the president of Denso USA LP, which includes the operations in the United States and South America. He has a Bachelor of Science in construction science from Texas A&M University. He started his career as a technical sales representative in August 1990 for Denso’s SeaShield products and worked in a variety of roles over the last 24 years.

Q: What is Denso’s lineage and background in prevention and sealing products?

A: Denso USA LP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Winn & Coales International, which was originally established in London, England, in 1883. We have been in business for over 131 years with the same trusted ownership. Denso’s petrolatum tape was developed over 85 years ago for the protection of steel pipelines against corrosion.

Denso’s anti-corrosion and sealing products have a proven track record of solving problems in all kinds of severely corrosive environments, including above or below ground applications and under water. We have offices and manufacturing plants around the world.

Q: With products that are obviously suited for a maritime environment, what has been your relationship with the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard?

A: We have a long history with the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy.

Over the years, we have supplied our Denso petrolatum tape system on ships and structures to protect pipes and fittings against corrosion. One of the main reasons the coating has been so successful is its ease of application with minimal surface preparation in wet and humid environments.

Also, we have completed many projects with our SeaShield Pile Protection Systems for their dock and pier facilities.

We recently completed an inspection of a 28 | CGF 6.5

Coast Guard facility in Ketchikan, Alaska, where our Series 100 Pile Protection was installed on steel piles for splash zone corrosion in 1996. The system was found to provide excellent corrosion protection [even] after 18 years.

We have case histories going back over 30 years ago with the U.S. Navy on providing Denso petrolatum tape to protect the under-deck piping on many of their docks.

In 1977, the U.S. Navy conducted a threeyear test at Port Hueneme comparing various coatings versus the Denso petrolatum system. Our system proved to be the best coating system for under-deck piping and has become a standard for this application.

Q: With an eye towards the future, are there new corrosion prevention technologies that you are working on?

A: We have a full team of chemists and a research and development department that continually look at new technologies for our tape products, liquid coatings, tank linings and pile protection systems.

We are currently working on the next generation of our SeaShield Series 2000FD to provide the ultimate splash zone corrosion protection in the most severe environments.

We are also working on new hydrocarbon resistance glass flake tank linings for fast return to service.

A: We recently completed independent testing at Texas A&M’s Civil Engineering Department with our SeaShield Series 400 utilizing C-Grid 450 Carbon Fiber, FiberForm Jacket and underwater grout.

We tested the system for flexural bending and compressive strength for the repair of timber piles. The system proved to double the strength of the original pile while reducing the weight when compared to the standard steel reinforcement (rebar) repair. All components are non-corrosive, so there are no future problems with spalling of the grout due to the rebar corroding. The fiberglass jackets and grouts are manufactured in-house to provide superior quality.

We found that engineers appreciate all of our independent testing, as it provides them confidence when specifying our systems.

Q: Other than corrosion mitigation, are there other advantages to using your products?

A: Denso has an excellent reputation for providing quality products.

Since we have had the same ownership for 131 years and only three chairmen, there has always been a commitment to providing excellent customer service. Many of our employees are trained and certified NACE Level 1 Coating Inspectors or higher.

They are qualified to make recommendations for our customers’ applications and very knowledgeable on all of our products.

We also can provide technical assistance and training at startup to make sure the project goes smoothly. We have built a trusted and reliable name with the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy due to our quality products and look forward to continually providing them with proven corrosion prevention products and systems for their future projects. O www.CGF-kmi.com

NextIssue

March 2015 Volume 7, Issue 1

Cover and In-Depth Interview with:

Admiral Paul F. Zukunft Commandant U.S. Coast Guard

Features Oil Spill/HAZMAT Mitigation & Response There are a variety of technologies and techniques available to manage the response to a contaminated spill on land or in the water.

Onboard Fire Detection & Suppression Quick detection and automated response can be very effective when faced with fire onboard a cutter.

Maritime Surveillance Day/night optics with the ability to operate in all weather conditions are key parameters for the maritime mission of the Coast Guard.

special section Cutter Programs The Coast Guard’s legacy, newly commissioned and indevelopment cutters all have something in common— the mission. U.S. Coast Guard Forum looks at the various cutter programs.

Special Who’s Who Pull-Out Supplement A pictorial review of the Coast Guard’s senior leadership.

Bonus Distribution ASNE Day Coast Guard Intelligence Industry Day

Insertion Order Deadline: February 23, 2015 • Ad Materials Deadline: March 2, 2015

For the next generation of Naval aviators, a next generation helicopter

119 The Philadelphia-built AW119Kx is the most powerful light, single engine helicopter in its class, delivering the performance, safety and reliability demanded to train our most valuable asset – the next generation of Naval helicopter pilots.

The AW119Kx provides basic helicopter ight training, cost effectively and without compromise. Built on a rugged and durable airframe, the superior power margins of the AW119Kx provide stable and forgiving handling characteristics while optimizing safety during training missions.

The AW119Kx provides excellent visibility and features an integrated state-of-the-art glass cockpit that increases situational awareness and allows for a smooth transition to modern combat helicopters.

Everything we do, we do with passion.

LEADING THE FUTURE AdvancedHelicopterTrainer.com agustawestland.com