Architecture Portfolio 2017

Page 1

KRISTEN PAIGE

ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO SELECTED WORKS 2017



Table of Contents Fine Arts Center & School Master Plan: Austin Waldorf School

5 - 13

Mixed-Use Apartment Building: San Juan

15 - 19

Art & Architecture Library: St. Edward’s University

21 - 25

Luminaire

27 - 31

Amtrak Train Station: Downtown Austin

33 - 39

Visual Communication Projects

41 - 45


4


Fine Arts Center & School Master Plan Location: Austin Waldorf School Technical Communications Studio Professor: Vince Snyder In Collaboration with: Jake Chavez


Existing Site Observations sensitivity to massing, craft, and craft, materials sensitivity to massing, and materials

creation of space building arrangement creation of space throughthrough building arrangement

overscaled building mass that is not harmonious to its surroundings overscaled building mass that is not harmoneous to its surroundings

poor circulation and lack of a lack campus poor circulation and of“heart” a campus “heart”

n

Site Map 1” = 50’

0 The Austin Waldorf School is a private school located in Southwest Austin. The school contacted the studio to design possible future developments as well as a new school master plan. The above graphic shows some of the strengths and weaknesses observed on the campus. The campus has a unique wooded environment and had organically developed

over time. The new master plan focuses on clustering buildings to create smaller campuses for the differing grade levels and activities while keeping with some of the organic nature already present. To create a more pedestrian and kid friendly environment, the parking and vehicle traffic were moved to the edge of campus.


The master plan of the campus was designed to create smaller hearts for each grade level as well as an activity heart. The section of campus my partner and I chose to further develop was a new arts center. This new section of campus would transform the existing theater building into a fine arts center and add a new theater building that would be more adequate for the needs and size of the school.

5

4

5

3

5

5

1

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

5 5

7

7

7 5

2

6

5

5

8

9 10 10

M

11

Master Plan Gatherings 1” = 100’

12

21 20

12 14

23

Campus Master Plan

13

1” = 50’ 5

4

100’ 15 12

7

7 7

7 7

2

6

5

16

5

8

18 22 9 10

17

10

11

5

May 12, 2016

5

7

5

17

6

Austin Waldorf School

2

5

8

12

14

3.

2. Kindergarden

4.

Master Plan

9 10

21 20

12

1. Pre-Kindergard

Master Sketch

5. 6.

Science Classroom Faculty Restroom Grade Classroom Student Restroom

7. 8.

Middle School Classroom Library

9.

Science Lab

10.

Sand Box

11.

13

Language Classroom

12.

12

13. 14.

May 12, 2016

5

5

16

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

5

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

5

19

5

1

CAPITAL ARCHITECTS

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

5

1

5

May 12,ARCHITECTS 2016 CAPITAL

5

High School Classroom High School Administration Computer Lab

23

16.

18.

Music Classroom Theater Classroom School Store

19.

Administration

20.22

18 Locker Room

21.

17 Eurythmy

15

17.

22.

19

23.

Performing Arts 24 Center Fine Arts Center

24.

Gymnasium

16

15.

High School Library16

10

17

Master Plan Gatherings

1” = 100’

A 1.0 11

Initial Design Sketch 12

12 14 13

23

21 20

Clusters

A

24

5

3

May 12, 2016

3

50’

Austin Waldorf School

25’ 5

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

0’

CAPITAL ARCHITECTS

5

4

Grouping

1. Pre-Kindergard 2. Kindergarden

Master Plan

3. 4. 5. 6.

Science Classroom Faculty Restroom Grade Classroom Student Restroom

7. 8.

Middle School Classroom Library

9.

Science Lab

10.

Master Plan Program 1” = 50’ Master Plan Gatherings

Sand Box

11.

1” = 100’

Language Classroom

12. 13. 14. 15.

High School Classroom High School Administration Computer Lab

16.

18.

Music Classroom Theater Classroom School Store

High School Library

19.

Administration

20.

Locker Room

21.

Eurythmy

17.

22. 23.

Performing Arts Center Fine Arts Center

24.

Gymnasium

Master Plan Program 1” = 50’

Master Plan Circulation

Vehicle Access

1” = 100’

Master Plan Diagrams

Master Plan Circulation

1” = 100’

A 1.2

7

A


1” = 50’

CAPITAL ARCHITECTS

Scale

Public Space 1” = 50’

Site Topography

Project Scope Ground Plan

Campus Section

Austin Waldorf School

1” = 100’

Master Pl Sections


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Fine Arts Center Section The existing theater building did not adequately satisfy the needs of the Austin Waldorf School. We transformed the existing building into a new much needed fine arts center and proposed a new theater building. The design of the new fine arts center facilitates an environment that would inspire creativity and exploration. The art classrooms are arranged

and interlocked in ways that form gathering and breakout spaces in between. The two levels and classroom pods create a village inside the larger shell. The fine arts center fosters an interactive and creative environment through shared gallery and break out spaces, views connecting classrooms, and a break from the other architecture found throughout campus. 9


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

CAPITAL ARCHITECTS

A

B

C

D

Austin Waldorf School

E

May 12, 2016

F

G

H I Fine Arts Center Pans

0’ 1’

2’

10

4’

Fine Arts Center Ground Plan 8’

Floor 1 1/8” = 1’

A 2.1


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

JAKE CHAVEZ + KRISTEN PAIGE

A

B

C

D E

May 12, 2016

F

G

H I Fine Arts Center Pans

Fine A P

0’ 1’

2’

4’

8’

Fine Arts Center Second Floor Plan

Floor 2

A

1/8” = 1’

11


Wall Assembly Construction Details

Formed Metal Coping

Base Flashing Over Cant Dam

1 A 2.3

Roof Deck 2 A 2.3

1 - Roof Detail

3” = 1’

5/8” Gypsum Board

3 A 2.3 4 A 2.4

Batt Insulation

5 A 2.4

Glazed Curtain Wall

6 A 2.4

2 - Curtain Wall Detail

3” = 1’

7 A 2.4

12” x 12” Floor Tile

Concrete Over Steel Deck

Wall Section

1/2” = 1’

Structural Steel Beam

12

3 - Floor Detail

3” = 1’


Metal Trim

Aluminum Window

22K9 Open-Web Steel Joist

6 - Window Sill Detail

3” = 1’

Hanger Wire

Gypsum Board

4 - Ceiling Structure Detail

1/2” Plywood Sheathing 3” = 1’

Finished Concrete Floor

6” Light-Gauge Steel Stud

Ceiling Runner Channel

Aluminum Window Header

5 - Ceiling & Window Detail

3” = 1’

7 -Foundation Detail

3” = 1’

13


14


Mixed-Use Apartment Building Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico Advanced Design Professor: Monica Rivera


N

SITE PLAN 1/32� = 1’ - 0�

The proposed apartment building is located along the edge of a large park in San Juan. The public park is mostly surrounded by single family residences and a train station in the northeast corner. The proposed apartment building would serve as a piece of a larger housing development 16

that will bring a higher density to the area and activate the underdeveloped park. The ground level of the apartment building serves as commercial space to activate the street level. Parking is available in the back along a shared residential service street keeping the front pedestrian friendly.


The first exercise carried out was one that analyzed entry. The relationship between planes, openings, and screens was explored to create an ideal method of entry into an apartment unit. Since the climate of San Juan is extremely hot and humid, methods of cross ventilation in an open

air unit were important in the entry design. The screening elements and entry serve as ways to create socialization as well as provide privacy while aiding in the climate control of the unit. 17


The second exercise focused solely on an individual unit. Relationships between spaces, screens and furniture were explored through a variety of mediums. Once key principles of unit and space organization were established they were applied to the cluster of units which would then form an entire residential floor. The key principles found throughout the building’s units include a central open living plan that allows light to penetrate the unit from entry to outdoor living space. Each unit has a kitchen adjacent to the living area facing the exterior hallway and entry. The kitchens serve as a way to activate the hallway and provide views out to the community and park. Outdoor living is essential in Puerto Rican culture so each unit has access to a private outdoor balcony space that opens up to the main living area.


FIRST RESIDENTIAL PLAN 1/8”= 1’-0”

Residential Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

19 GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1/8”= 1’-0”


20


Art & Architecture Library Location: St. Edward’s University, Austin, Texas Advanced Design Professor: Michael Benedikt


  

The proposed art and architecture library is located in front of the existing arts building. The library would hold a collection of art and architecture materials as well as provide study space for students. The building is made up of 22

three main parts including a gallery for art and architecture models, student study spaces accompanied by a collection of reading materials, and service space. The ground level has a cafe to serve this area of campus.


Fourth Floor

Third Floor

Ground Plan

Second Floor

23


The main library and study space features a large atrium that brings in natural light and connects views to the various floors of the building. The top two floors feature individual study areas while the second floor provides group study rooms. The ground floor has a large lobby space where models and installations can be displayed. 24



26


Luminaire Environmental Controls Class Professor: Keith Simon In Collaboration with: Raquel Royal, Jake Chavez, Kent Bhupathi


Existing Conditions

Existing Conditions Diagram The luminaire was designed as a lighting fixture for outdoor umbrellas. The area that gave inspiration to the fixture is a food truck court near the University of Texas campus. The area was poorly lit and uninviting to patrons of the local food trucks. The lighting device creates hierarchy in the space encouraging patrons to gather in specific areas, improves the eating experience by providing ample light to see one’s food, in addition to creating a more secure feeling in the food court overall.

Design Intent


2”

BOTTOM-UP VIEW

TOP-DOWN VIEW

12”

1.5”

7”

2.5”

7.5”

ELEVATION

5”

.25”

1”

SECTION

The luminaire utilizes a tiered design to disperse light up and outward. Most of the light is directed upward illuminating the umbrella it is installed upon. The bottom of the fixture is translucent, allowing a softer light to filter through towards the table or space underneath. The tiers allow light to escape the sides, highlighting the device and providing an aesthetic appeal that most devices currently on the market lack. The design allows for installation on any standard outdoor umbrella pole. To install the fixture, the user slips the umbrella pole through the central hole and hooks the transparent hanging line through the umbrella ribs. The fixture height can be adjusted along the pole using the various length loops in the hanging line to provide the desired lighting effect. In addition, the luminaire has two brightness settings. The overall design is to provide an easily installed umbrella light that not only effectively lights the intended space, but provides a pleasant environment for eating and gathering. 29


Lamp Information

Type: LED Voltage: 1200V Color: Soft White Color Temperature: 2700K Base: DECO Candelabra Base Brightness: 200 Lumens Wattage: 4W Efficacy: 200 Lumens/4 Watts=50 Lumens/Watt Weight: 1lb 12oz Annual Electric Cost: Assuming the luminaire will be lit for 6hrs a day at a rate of $0.11/KWh, the annual cost of the luminaire is $1.93.

Partially Lit

Fully Lit

180

180

Fully Lit

Partially Lit

Angle

Lux

Cd

Lux

Cd

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

10.35 10 10 9.75 9.8 11.1 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.5 11.5 11.5 11 10.4 10 9.5 9.3 9.75 9.5

2.1 2.03 2.03 1.97 1.98 2.25 2.37 2.37 2.37 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.23 2.11 2.03 1.92 1.88 1.97 1.92

5 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 5.5 5.75 5.75 5.9 5.65 5.75 5.7 5.5 5.2 4.6 4.35 4.7 4.7 4.65

1.01 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.11 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.14 1.16 1.15 1.11 1.05 0.93 0.88 0.95 0.95 4.45

Photometric Curves

170

Fully Lit

160 150 140 130 120

110

100

90

80

70

60 50 40 30 10

20

0

0.5 candela intervals

Partially Lit

Angle

Lux

Cd

Lux

Cd

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

16.5 16 14.5 14.8 17.5 18.2 15.2 12.5 11.5 11.6 12.8 15.7 17.4 18.4 18 15 14.8 16.7 16.2

3.34 3.24 2.94 3.00 3.54 3.69 3.08 2.53 2.33 2.35 2.59 3.18 3.52 3.73 3.65 3.04 3.00 3.38 3.28

7.9 7.8 7.5 6.7 7.75 8 7 7 6 6 6.5 7.5 9 9.8 9.1 7.6 7.4 8.4 8

1.60 1.58 1.52 1.36 1.57 1.62 1.42 1.42 1.22 1.22 1.32 1.52 1.82 1.98 1.84 1.54 1.50 1.70 1.62

170

160 150 140 130 120

110

100

90

80

70

60 50 40 30 10

20

0

0.5 candela intervals



32


Amtrak Train Station Location: Downtown Austin, Texas Design VI Professor: Michael Hargins






RANGE RANGE



34



The existing Amtrak train station, located on South Lamar close to Downtown, has the potential to be a major urban hub. The design of the project focuses on creating a vibrant area for retail and events to draw non-passengers to the site, in addition to celebrating the station itself. Drawing attention to the underutilized mode of rail transportation in Austin and Texas as a whole was a goal in the project design. The elevated, open air waiting platform allows for views to Lady Bird Lake and South Austin as well as the passing trains and activity below. The retail and green space tier down to street level where a new bus stop would be established to allow for easy access to the city transportation system. In addition to traveling to and from the site via public transportation, there is an underground parking garage accessible from West 3rd Street.






 



 









 

 







 



 



Ground Plan

Transverse Section

35



The main structural systems utilized in the station design are concrete structural cores and steel trusses. The exposed trusses serve as structure as well as part of the station aesthetic. Panels, glass, and members are inserted between truss members to partially enclose the viewing platform allowing air flow and views out. 37










 















Upper Level Plan

Longitudinal Section

 





40


Visual Communication Projects Graphite Tone Drawing University of Texas Campus Vis Com I Studio


Section Model of Building Facade Precedent Building: San Francisco Federal Building, San Francisco, CA Construction V

42


Mapping Exercise of South Lamar Corridor in Austin, Texas Design V Studio Left: Analysis and exploration of the topography and water systems Right: Analysis and exploration of the thermal comfort and impervious cover

43


Sketches/Drawings/Watercolor Study in Italy Program Professor: Smilja Milovanovic

Perugia

Castiglioncello

Street: Perugia


Scarpa Detail: Brion Cemetery

MAXXI Museum: Rome



KRISTEN PAIGE

kristengpaige@gmail.com c e l l : 8 3 2 - 2 6 5 - 4 1 1 7



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.