Studio Catalogue
2020–2021 School of Architecture, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Course codes for studio projects YR 4: A42A13 + A42B13 + A42C14 + A42D14 YR 5: A52A13 + A52B13
Studios 2020/2021
Architecture and Daylight ............ 2 Fragmentation and Coherence ............ 4 Housing ............ 6 Making ..........10 Northern Grounds ..........12 Out of Practice ..........14 Peripheral Futures ..........16 Public Service ..........18 RE- ..........20 Searching for Ma ..........22 Urbanism and Landscape Studio ..........24
Architecture and Daylight Teachers: Foteini Kyriakidou, Per Franson, Rodrigo Muro, Ute Besenecker
Studio Theme
Project 1
Given the intimate correlation of light and architecture, their
Daylight observations & (re)interpretations
dependency and influence on human perception and experience, the
Through experience, analysis and reflection students will be able to
Studio focuses on a strong interdisciplinary approach of Light,
grasp terminology, concepts and qualities of light & space.
Architecture, Art & Engineering. By orchestrating the visible and the
Observation, analysis, sketching and model making are the main
invisible throughout the design process will allow human centred and
tools. Moving between lectures and theory of light and human
empathic spaces. These poetic dimensions as well as the tectonic
perception through hands-on exercises using both analogue and
properties of architecture are enhanced and conveyed by using light
digital tools.
and darkness as materials.
From language based mental models, following on interpretations
The aim is to create a synergy between Light & Architecture through
and verbal descriptions, to an immersive experience of Vernacular
an interdisciplinary platform. Architecture will be observed, analyzed,
architecture. Dynamics of daylight and its complexity is to be
discussed and interpreted by means of a design based approach
translated into scale spatial configurations emerged from
where light is the common thread. Modelling and experiencing light at
experimentation, iteration and re-interpretation.
different scales, from working models to immersive large scale models will be a fundamental part of this journey.
Project 2 Daylight exploration and experience
Studio Methodology
The focus is on Openings in Architecture through a collaboration with
Theory and practice support each other in parallel by applying
KTH Civil Engineers and Construction Management students. The
theoretical knowledge to experiments and projects. The method is to
task involves design, construction and energy calculations for an
learn through observation, site analysis and practical testing; first-
apartment in a site-specific location. The result consists of a
hand experience.
functional scale window design, its daylight intake character and
As daylight is diverse and varies, the studio method is site specific
technical properties.
in the Nordic context. Gained knowledge, methodology and practical exercises are transferable and contextualize to any desired
Project 3
geographical point.
Material, spatial and daylight implementation
P1: contemplates individual projects of research, interpretation, schemes and daylight layouts.
Working with the pre-existing environmental conditions, village infrastructure and collaboration with a mix of locals, tourists and
P2: group and individual work to solve and propose a site-specific Daylight Project.
researchers at Kristinebergs Marine Center we will explore the possibility of a new blue industry and economy.
P3 & 4: a two stages architectural project on a real location and site-specific conditions.
With aims on a site-specific daylight habitable installation, Studio will document and interpret the environmental conditions of Skaftรถ Island, specifically the location of Kristineberg and its proximity to Gullmarsfjorden and the ocean. Project 4 Addition to Kristineberg Marine Center Moving from P3 reviews and interdisciplinary tutorials with experts in structure, sustainable and climate design, the project development process gains an eco-tectonic focus around daylight design and architectural sustainability with the progressive program of an intervention to the Marine center.
Foteini Kyriakidou
Per Franson
Rodrigo Muro
Architect with master in Architectural
Head of the Architectural Lighting
Professionally experienced architect &
Lighting. Internationally experienced architect
Department with 15 years of experience of
lighting designer is the Program Director at
and Lighting Designer.
own practice, keen on bringing practice and
KTH for the masters in Architectural Lighting
education closer together.
Design.
Ute Besenecker Associate Professor in Architectural Lighting, researcher and designer with 20 years of architectural and lighting design experience.
2
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. Kristineberg bridge, Sara Sandkvist 2. Nature Mapping, 2020 3. Light model, Amy, Sara, Ossian, Jeff 4. Window construction drawing 5. Light collage
5.
3
Fragmentation and Coherence Teachers: Carmen Izquierdo, Jesús Azpeitia, Peter Lynch
To practice well the architect must understand a remarkably broad
Project 1
range of concerns, from spirit and atmosphere to waterproofing and
The Göta canal (1806-1832) remains Sweden’s most important
flashing. We help you develop a productive and enjoyable design
infrastructure project. With Trollhätte Canal it forms an inland
method that circulates freely between objective and subjective
waterway between east and west coasts. It was built before steam
criteria, fact and intuition, in a consequential and productive way. We
power and dynamite: the channel was dug by hand. We focus on the
approach comprehensive architectural design tasks via three sister
stretch south and west of Norrköping, between Vättern and the
disciplines: landscape architecture, urban design, and structural
Baltic. Identify important architectural and landscape elements in your
design. We encourage you to deepen your understanding of these
study area and represent them in a digital parallel projection line
fields.
drawing. Projection type, technique, and scale should be chosen to
We emphasize line drawing, hand sketching, physical modeling,
represent all key elements – large and small – with an equal hand.
and physical prototyping. Since early 2020 we emphasize digital
Don’t focus on the canal alone, but on significant elements and
rendering as an in-process design tool—capable of testing subtle
features that the canal strings together: roads, allées, estates,
qualities of light and mood. We collaborate with KTH Byggvetenskap
churches, embankments, locks, bollards... Your drawing is a
department. For environmental and pedagogical reasons, we focus
diachronic story of the character and history of the region.
on contemporary timber-hybrid construction methods and materials.
Part 2: Working alone, make a design intervention in your study
Students present their work in a public exhibition at year’s end.
area that clarifies or enriches the character of the place. The proposal
Participation in the show—design, installation, de-installation—is a
can be at any scale and can involve changes or additions to any type
required part of the course.
of element: landscape, architectural, infrastructural. The project
Since 2017 many of the studio’s projects have been sited in Norrköping, a former industrial city on the Motala River, southwest of
draws upon ideas and strategies of Barcelona architect-urbanist Manuel de Sola Morales (1939-2012).
Stockholm. Through urban, architectural, landscape, and structural design projects, we have studied the city systematically– focusing on
Project 2
the historical center and industrial quarter, then moving outwards to
Movable Timber-Hybrid Bridge over Göta Canal
major boulevard nodes, the Motala river corridor, and the immediate
Working in small groups, make a proposal for a new movable bridge
periphery. This term we end our investigation with a territorial
over the canal at one of three locations. Investigate contemporary
perspective
timber construction methods/materials. Resolve all aspects of the project, from site planning to construction detailing. Key collaborators: structural engineer Roberto Crocetti and materials scientist Magnus Wålinder (KTH Byggvetenskap), Norrköpings kommun.
!!! Please note: Fragmentation and Coherence Stuidio is given the last time during the autumn of 2020. The Urbanism and Landscape Studio is offered in the spring .
Peter Lynch
Carmen Izquierdo
Jesús Azpeitia
PL is a KTH Guest Professor, has run his
CI is an architect COAM, SAR-MSA, runs
JA is creative director at Tengbom. He has
own office since 1991. Building Culture PLA
her own firm Esencial AB. CI is passionate
taught at KTH since 2006. In 2012 he was
focuses on applied research in architecture,
about a visionary architecture that brings
named KTH teacher of the year. His practice
urbanism, and building technology.
poetry to our everyday lives, that unites art
is focused on sustainable development and
Stuckeman Visiting Professor, Penn State,
and technology. Her work has been awarded
design; creative processes that lead to high-
2015. Cranbrook Architecture Head 1996-
with the Kasper Salin Prize. She has taught
quality architecture; and on gender equality
05. Has taught at Harvard GSD, Columbia,
at the School of Architecture at KTH in both
and diversity. His pedagogy emphasizes
RISD, and Parsons.
undergraduate and master's programs.
innovation, aesthetics, and tectonics.
4
1. 3.
2. 4.
1. Proposal for timber-hybrid pedestrian and cycle bridge over the Motala River, Norrköping. View of large-scale model at final presentation. Boyd Hellier Knox, Julius Puttkammer, and Josef Vild. 2. Proposal for timber-hybrid pedestrian and cycle bridge over the Motala River, Norrköping. Photomontage. Victor Johansson and Anton Valek, HT 2019 studio project. 3. “Timescape Garden”: detail of landscape design proposal for Fåfängen and Danviksbergen, Södermalm, Stockholm. Julia Thiem, HT 2019 studio project. 4. Study of Økern cultural landscape, Oslo. Detail of reconstructed industrial landscape in 1938. Emma Moberg, VT 2020 Diploma Project..
5
Housing Studio Teachers: Erik Stenberg, Frida Rosenberg
Muddy and Motley Mass Housing for Millions of Homes
Project 1
The Housing Studio will explore and design mass housing solutions
Prototyping Mass Housing
from several perspectives, such as prefabrication, material
Studies of prototypes in mass housing, indicating a testing of
technology, tectonics and sustainability as well as portraying
materials, structural systems, apartment conditions and the urban
historical circumstances and exploring living conditions. One focus
setting. We will locate, map and analyze Swedish and international
will be on the implications of the Welfare State housing production.
examples in East and West Europe, as well as North and South
While we believe there are many lessons to be learned from this
America of mass housing prototypes. An important aspect will be the
particular point in time in Sweden, we also argue for a broader
documentation and communication of your research. These do not
understanding of the vast network of mass housing developments
necessary mean cataloguing in an ordinary sense, but more as ways
across the globe. In addition, building in the face of climate change
of exploring representation in drawings and model making in order to
urges us to seriously (re-)consider how to build with systems and
communicate research. Our ambition is to exhibit the material.
materials. By mapping, analyzing, and recreating a catalogue of housing environments, their structural similarities as well as
Project 2
contextual differences may give vital clues to some of the
The Collective Prototype
unanswered questions of emergent and contemporary housing
Ideal living formats and revisions, recreations and reconstructions of
issues. Why does the automated production of housing still remain
existing mass housing to produce shared space. How do we dwell?
aesthetically similar? How much of the social challenge of Post War
In what ways is it possible to explore and use unconventional
mass housing environments rests in their architecture? When will the
solutions in mass housing, if these might be technical inventions or
Housing Question be answered?
social experiments or adapt to current forms of living? An important aspect of the project is to understand the possibilities in the
Studio Methodology
construction systems of mass housing as well as questioning space
The studio proposes a process of designing mass housing as it
related to function, outdated norms and family constellations.
relates to structural and material methods intimately tied with a historical perspective. We think that design through knowledge in
Project 3
material and architectural technology implicates the understanding of
Industrialized Wood Systems
tectonics and space. Our ambition is to give students a thorough
Deconstruction of cutting-edge prefabricated wood systems. What
knowledge of the processes and mechanics of housing in order to
can we learn from current Swedish and international development of
upgrade and improve the architects’ role in current building
mass housing solutions in wood? We will pick apart, analyze and
production. The studio will foster an empathetic attitude for the
reconstruct an array of wood system solutions offered by and to
complementary roles of the architect and engineer. Our primary tools
architects today and compare these with international systems on the
will be surveying/cataloguing and drawings of both new and
market. The studio will methodologically plot and record wood
historical precedents as part of our mapping phase. Each semester
construction in mass housing through interviews, visits to
will include a phase of identifying and researching existing examples
construction sites and architecture offices.
as well as a design phase proposing reconstructions of existing and/or new mass housing. Our teaching methodology proactively
Project 4
engages with contemporary practices by extensively making use of
Collective Living in Wood
case studies and site visits.
Designing contemporary mass housing in a globalized world. We will design a new mass housing solution with focus on the collective aspects. Given a specific site and context, a new housing typology, a new series of homes, a new structural system, and/or a new urban condition will be explored and designed. A text reflecting on the design will also be written.
Erik Stenberg
Frida Rosenberg
ES is an Associate Professor in Architecture
FR is a lecturer in Architecture teaching both
with 20 years of teaching experience also
design and history/theory courses. She has a
engaged in housing research. He has a
PhD in Architecture history with a focus on
special affinity for the Swedish Million
architectural technology, which analyzed the
Program Era and is currently pursuing
introduction of steel construction in post war
solutions to the contemporary Housing
Sweden in relation to the collaborative
Question in the face of climate change.
aspect of making architecture.
6
1.
2.
3.
4. 1. Ralph Erskine and Skånska Cementgjuteriet, Växjö 1955 from Vi Cementgjutare nr 2: 1955. 2. Student exhibit at Stadsarkivet Liljeholmskajen, published in Arkitekten November 2019. 3. Students Niklas Dierks and Leo Friedmann, analysis of Ralph Erskine's 1955 Växjö project 2019. 4. Student Hongyou Wan, intervention in Ohlsson & Skarne and HSB's 1968 Brf Päronet in Tensta 2019. 5. Fourth year students, Folkhem and Martinsson pages from a catalogue of contemporary structural systems 2020
5.
7
Making Teachers: Fredrik Stenberg, Nina Taghavi
Studio Theme
Project 1
We work in scale 1:1 and we explore the realization. We studied the
Formgiving: Ideology, conviction, pathos
built in details with details. We talk about what we can see, touch
We start with a manifest, or a letter of intent as a starting point. With
and feel with our senses and the body’s influence in the build. We
conscious choices we make structures. We move towards letting the
look closely at the materials and study how the materials build
intention of the designer being the active agent.
spaces. We do not study 2D renderings, but rather 3Dstructures
A manifesto is a published declaration of the intentions, motives, or
through engineering. We do not talk about scenarios and
views of the issuer, be it an individual, group, political party or
hypotheses, but rather learning by MAKING and the reMAKING. We
government [Wikipedia]
sketch 3D and we stay (or reside) in the productive zone by MAKING. It's a practical merit.
Project 2 Form Finding
"The ability to build assumes the knowledge of all architecture
The architect takes a step back and leans against the process. The
and construction forms, as well as their development. To build
goal is not to design the ultimate form or shape but rather to find it
means to advance this process, to investigate, and to make. The
with the help of different processes. We’ll make design by letting the
development of buildings began over ten thousand years ago
process be the active agent
and has reached an extremely high level, but is in no way a closed process. There are still an infinite number of open
Project 3
possibilities, infinite discoveries to make."
Ornament – Representation
(A Conversation with Frei Otto, Juan María Songel 2004)
Perhaps you have during your studies so far stumbled across the architect word: tectonics? Gottfried Semper talks about tectonics
Studio Methodology
being the result of two principles in architecture. First you have the
Designing and making is key to the design process here in order to
structure of the space/building what he calls the core-form. What is
gain new insights and knowledge. The process as well as the
needed to hold it up, to build to make it stand. The second principle
outcomes are essential parts of the discourse, the evidence. The
is the ornament called the art-form. When the art-form is masking the
results are communicated through design work as well as placed in a
core-form we talk about ornament and when you can't distinguish the
field of references and understanding. The design begins at the
art-form from the core-form we talk about tectonics. We will make
outset. It is not about design as an adjective, it's about design as a
structures by letting the art-form be the active agent.
noun. It's not about consuming or referring to design, it's about making it. Throughout the year we will approach the design process
Project 4
in different ways by letting different agents be the active force within
Material – Tectonics
the framework of the projects. The agent being the carrier, the
There is a tradition within architecture of going to the material and
responsible to whom you lean towards. We will work, the agent will
asking it what I can do. Implying that there is an underlying tectonical
operate.
logic in every material. We will build structures having the tectonics
We will work transdisciplinary through workshops with artists, set
being the active agent.
designers, curators, carpenters and engineers. 50% of the time we will be out in the field and the rest at the school. The nature of the building project demands 80% of an 40 h week during daytime. We will not do a study trip outside Stockholm or perhaps no more than a small daily excursion. We relate to sustainability through using re- and upcycled materials and by relating ourselves economically to material, time and money by examining materials' diverse aspects.
Fredrik Stenberg
Nina Taghavi
FS is an architect based in Stockholm. He
NT has been an architect in Stockholm since
has worked as a lecturer at KTH since 2016.
2008 (hons) and a teacher/lecturer at KTH
He is one of the founding members in the
school of Architecture since 2014. Between
collective Uglycute and participated in the
the years 2010–14 she worked in an
Art and Architecture Biennale (2003 and
architecture firm in Paris. Today she runs her
2010) in Venice, and are represented in the
firm next to teaching and draw housing
collections of Moderna museet.
projects, interiors or make scenography.
8
1.
2. 3. 2.
3.
1. The Manhattan transcripts, Bernard Tschumi 1976. 2. Victor Papanek, Design for the real world (1971). 3. Supergraphics by Barbara Stauffacher Solomon in the Moonraker Athletic Center, Sea Ranch California, 1966. 4. Bella Rune: XYZ at Galleri Magnus Karlsson, 2019.
4.
.
9
Northern Grounds Teachers: Cecilia Lundbäck, Ulrika Karlsson
Studio Theme
Project 1
The studio will continue its focus on architecture and its
Collecting Points
representations by starting a 3-year theme looking towards the north
The first project will engage in a design research through capturing,
– the larger area in and around northern Scandinavia where diverse
recording, translating and storing of information that will form the
cultures, ecologies and interests reside across national boundaries.
point of departure for the design of a new a train station, including a
The area holds important recourses of raw materials (iron, wood, oil
pick up point, a delivery station, a small market, a square and a
and energy stored in highly located waters) and industries for their
meeting point in the Norrbotten region of the North. Through critical
processing. The right to the use of land and water is also a heated
and explorative use of 3D scanning techniques, the studio will push
and greatly debated question. The studio will engage a series of sites
the idea of architectural representations and the storage of
of the north - natural, museal, fictive as well as places in the
information engaging with the collection of millions of points and
electronic weave.
moving images. These processes both preserve, repair and construct
This year the studio will have a specific architectural focus on the
sites as well as affect architecture’s relationship to crafted aesthetic
illusory and instable concepts of grounds, interiors and their coming
tendencies that emerge when translating between various mediums.
together as interior grounds. The levelling, construction and elevation of ground marks the difference between the interior and the urban or
Project 2
rural rougher surroundings of a possible outside, a process of
Interior Grounds
domesticating land, engaging both aspects of communal effort and
The collected points, representational techniques and design
community’s control as described by Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino
methods developed in the first part of the semester will be further
Tattara. Another account of the architectural aspect of the ground
developed for the design of this new train station or junction. These
can be found in the mound being one of four elements of architecture
alterations may critically engage the architectural disassembly and
of Gottfried Semper.
reassembly of grounds, interior grounds, ground as infrastructure, interior infrastructures.
Teaching Methodology How we work affects what we produce. We focus on design
Project 3
research through making and encourage a curious exploration of the
Recollection – Hågkomst
aesthetic implications of machinic processes for representation and
During the second semester the studio will look into the design of a
production. This will entail deploying tools and techniques of
larger and more complex architectural project of an archive in the
mediation for acquiring, representing, cataloguing and designing -
north. Archives of the north forms systems and practices of
from machine learning and AI to robotic manufacturing and image
recollection; through archiving and displaying, storing and keeping
processing. The entwined relationships between physical and digital,
safe. The architecture, construction and materiality of the archive will
real and virtual, human and machine, continue to produce sensibilities
be considered in parallel to the archive as data set, as collection of
where our understanding of notions of place, image and architecture
information. To add to the repertoire of techniques for collection and
may be challenged. Contrary to a linear approach where
mediation we will use AI - artificial intelligences to process
technological processes are applied for optimization, this studio
information, images and other sets of data.
adopts a bi-directional approach where they are instead drivers for design development. We aim to offer and discuss different takes on
Project 4
how architectural history, theory, practice and culture informs the
Archives of the North
work. Through design, the students’ collaborative and individual work
During the end of the semester the archives of the north will go
will contribute to architectural discourse and its dialog with
through a design development phase, where students get an
contemporary society, art, popular culture and aesthetics.
opportunity to experiment and develop a set of representations and presentations of their projects. We will return to issues around the role of architectural representations including moving images in architecture and the concept of the super image and super model.
Cecilia Lundbäck
Ulrika Karlsson
is an architect and partner of the architectural
UK is an architect and landscape architect,
practice Brrum. She is a lecturer at KTH
partner of the architectural practice Brrum as
School of Architecture and has taught since
well as of Servo Stockholm. She is a
2015. At KTH she is also engaged in artistic
Professor in Architecture at the KTH School
research within the field of architecture
of Architecture and currently a Guest
funded by VR. She has previously worked at
Professor at Städelschule, Frankfurt. At KTH
SandellSandberg and has a background in
she is engaged in artistic research within the
furniture design and making.
field of architecture funded by VR.
10
1.
2.
3.
4. 1. Ralph Erskine, 1958. 2. Architect Osvald Almqvist. 3. Stora Sjรถfallet., Point cloud study,. 4. Superdrawing, Rikke Winther and Sindri Sigurdsson, studio project, 2018. 5. Machine Architecture, Max Spett, studio diploma project, 2018.
5.
11
Out of Practice Teachers: Anders Berensson, Malin Heyman
Studio Theme
Project 1
What are the elements that constitute architectural practice today,
Taking Measures / Site Survey
and how do we practice becoming practitioners? Out of Practice
After revisiting processes for how land is surveyed, we will propose
sets out to take a few close looks at an entangled contemporary
priorities for what and how to measure through the production of
architectural practice by isolating selected aspects for study in order
drawings to scale and 1:1 drawing on site.
to discern their potentials and pitfalls. Out of Practice argues first, that the tools and methods used in architectural practice have
Room for Whom / Project Description
significant effects on the resulting architectures as well as on the
We reflect on speculative project descriptions by composing our own
consequences of their production, and second, that past and present
science fiction manuscripts to be acted out on site in 1:1 using
structures of power are embedded within these tools and methods.
bodies and props.
By attentively and playfully using, discussing and attempting to challenge them, we hope to slowly start untangling our
Project 2
understanding of what agency we have as practitioners. By working
Shoot, the Picture! / Collage
an embodied perspective into all experiments as well as working out
Architecture imagines futures. In this project we imagine through
our imagination, we will practice making ourselves aware of our own
collaging images and visualizing in detail 1:1.
points of view and exercise our empathy. Stock Check / Room Specifications Teaching Methodology
The contemporary production of buildings is to a significant degree a
Projects will be short and focused over the course of the academic
matter of combining readymade products. We will study the architect
year. By isolating one fundamental aspect/method of practice at a
as shopper and use room specifications as our tool.
time and providing frameworks for how our work oscillates between production and reflection, we aim to improve our command over each
Project 3
method as well as deepen our understanding of histories and effects
What’s the Matter? / Building System
that may otherwise be overlooked. On the topic of each method, we
Through work in groups constructing a (very) small building, we study
will learn both from a representative from within architectural/building
a common building system in all its parts and functions by first
practice and a guest from another field where the same method is
building according to standard and then reconstruct.
applied. As both deliverables and manner of working will vary significantly between projects, we intend for different abilities,
Reviewing the Reference / Architectural Review
inclinations and previous experience within the student group to
Considering what aspects of architecture are habitually reviewed as
come to light at different points of the year.
well as used as reference, we look for variety in perspective through the production of written reviews on existing architectures. Project 4 Schooling Tooling / Modelling Curious about the effects modelling tools have on architectural production, we apply both traditional and recent methods to the making of models and mock-ups. Hold Your Own / Your Choice Students individually make their own choice for an aspect of architectural practice to study, as well as decide on format for output.
Anders Berensson
Malin Heyman
AB is an architect educated at Chalmers
MH is an architect educated at KTH, the
University of technology and KTH. AB has
Cooper Union in New York and the Royal
worked at OMA, co-founded visionsdivision
Institute of Art in Stockholm. After ten years
and is currently director of Anders Berensson
of working as an architect at Petra Gipp
Architects. AB is a lecturer at KTH School of
arkitektur, MH co-founded the practice AT -
Architecture and has previously taught KTH
HH. MH is a lecturer at KTH School of
Master Studio, Full Scale Studio.
Architecture and has previously taught first year and master level design studios.
12
1.
2.
3.
5.
4. 1. Arnold Pumping Iron, Los Angeles Times Archives. 2. Assembly line robots, www.bigmarketresearch.com 3. Roxanne Williamson, Career Connections of Major American Architects, from American Architects and the Mechaniscs of Fame, 1991. 4. The secret history of woman in coding, New Yorks Times 5. The functions of the architect mural by Ruth Ellis for the Building Centre's New Bond Street exhibitions 6. World War II airplane production, www.history.com.
6.
13
Peripheral Futures Teachers: Ori Merom, Rumi Kubokawa
“To articulate what is past does not mean to recognize “how it
Project 1
really was.” It means to take control of a memory, as it flashes in
Home
a moment of danger.”
The notion of home has different implications, informed by our
Walter Benjamin
memories, experiences, culture and aspirations, yet all of us seek to feel at home. Reflecting on the experience of the current crisis, its open ended nature and a sense that from now on we cannot go back
The studio will work with the periphery as a project, and examine
to business as usual, we will attempt to define the home of the post-
ways in which architecture can work with models and methods that
crisis; this project will examine the dynamics of conflicts surrounding
respond to the possibility of re-thinking the occupation of such
the home as places, working with concepts of imperfection and
territories. Exploring architecture from the notion of being in the
tolerance to reveal a process grounded on acute observation and
periphery, things happening at the margins, seeing the world from a
precision.
peripheral place. We will incorporate an awareness of change brought by an unusual
Project 2
set of circumstances: the sudden possibility of halting economic
The Context of Home
progress, with lives under expanded control, when no stability
To design is to define a context and to re-shape the given.
(political, economical or social) is assured. We will explore our
Considering the context of home, we will reassess the essential
preparedness and necessity to live with uncertainties and impart
structures necessary to support this new life – from ecologies to
qualities found in this new condition. Not in a distant utopia but a
infrastructures; attempting to find freedom in the limitations imposed
closer alternative to a world more and more encapsulated in rules
by the curtailment of our social lives, examining the social
and regulations. We will consider the fragility of life but not create
relationships afforded by the disruption of the conventional image of
buildings as a protection from the strangeness of the world.
the built environment as a stable entity and challenging the orthodoxies of progress and growth.
Studio Methodology The challenge of architectural education arises from the teachers'
Project 3
dual role: they are asked to lead, yet play only a supportive role. The
Peripheral Stories
studio proposes a teaching towards the unknown, as a shared
Magical realism is defined as what happens when a highly detailed,
discovery. Students are taught to respond to and act on their own
realistic setting is invaded by something too strange to believe.
vision and creativity. This involves a pact of trust between teachers
This project will use text to explore in drawings the spatial
and students, the pact is about personal development. Success
relationship between people and buildings, the kinship between
means that students managed to form their own architectural identity,
architecture and human gestures and the world they describe. The
understand their strengths and weaknesses, exploit the former and
immediacy and the precision of drawings to figure something out, the
find ways to overcome the latter.
thinking drawing that asks questions and seeks to understand the
This framework involves a custom tailored education that supports
paradoxes of the world as a constructed entity.
the specific development of each student with a holistic program that inspires students to think broadly and in an interdisciplinary manner;
Project 4
amalgamate learning and research that supports the study of applied
Peripheral Communities
issues of sustainability and construction.
This project will take place in the north of Sweden. Reflecting on the current climate emergency and architecture’s lack of engagement with it, we will reconsider the outpost as a viable place of community. Developing the ideas from peripheral stories, we will explore different concepts for community, new forms of social and cultural relationships constructing narratives of how we live together, and the implications of these in spatial practice.
Ori Merom
Rumi Kubokawa
OM i s an architect and teacher.
RK is an architect and teacher. Has practiced
www.meromarchitects.com
in the UK and taught at The University of
www.corsaroarchitetti.it/
East London.
www.hey5.xyz
14
1. Paulina Aydin Home in Diaspora, Diploma Honours 2020
15
Public Service Teachers: Karin Matz, Rutger Sjögrim
What constitutes an architecture in service of others? Places where
Project 1
we labour to care for others? Spaces where we work to build and
Over And Over And Over Again
sustain a life that is shared with others?
We have cleaning and exercise routines for our own bodies. But what
Understanding architectural space as intimately linked to the
is the cleaning routine for our built environment? What goes into
production of both biological life and the lives that we live and share,
keeping our cities in shape? We will spend the first half of the
and also thinking of public space as a place for discourse, friction,
autumn semester digging into the world of cleaning our everyday
conflict and negotiation; studio Public Service will interrogate and
environments; the invisible work which is being performed constantly
design architectures of shifting scales. We will move from the precise
in our cities. We will focus on the people who work with this invisible
contours and shapes interacting with the labouring body in acts of
everyday maintenance and the architecture they inhabit!
maintenance and care, to the spatial enclosures capable of sustaining and creating community and a shared public life, onwards
Project 2
to the architectural complexes of mass media production and
Our House
transmission in the service of a public life at the scale of population.
What is a public space? What are the material realities of public
Through a yearlong investigation we will interrogate the processes,
spaces and what constitutes a life that is public? A life that is not
environments and labour that builds and sustains our public, shared,
work and not domestic, not labour and not recuperation. A life that is
and mediated lives.
shared, where we construct ourselves as political subjects.
Studio methodology
will focus on the program (what will be in it?) and conceptual analysis
Our method rests on an openness to multiplicity (in interests,
(why?), designing archetypes for public buildings and then finding
perspectives, and disciplines); and equal amounts of criticality,
sites for them to infiltrate, challenge and inhabit.
The project will task you with the design of a public building. We
optimism, collaboration, joy and rigor. The schedule consists of weekly tutorials with teachers and a weekly lecture (in tools, the
Project 3
practice, or theory), seminar or group review.
Public Service – Broadcast
Through the year we will work with a sequence of projects that
Building on the experience from the first semester (the maintenance
move from small to large. Each project presents a certain toolset
of space and the production of public space), we now turn our focus
(techniques of representation as well as techniques of interrogation)
to the production and maintenance of a nationwide mediated public
that is carried on to the next project. For each project there is a shift
space through the design of a new headquarters for the Swedish
in scale, focus and distribution.
public broadcasting companies; SVT (television), SR (radio) and UR (educational media). We will investigate both existing and future needs, the shifting landscapes of broadcast media as well as the political and cultural role of an independent public broadcasting organisation. The project will focus on program and conceptual design, site selection and urban scale massing, leading up to a level of completion comparable to a competition entry. Project 4 Public Service – Building For the final project it is time to inhabit, develop, refine, and explore the design proposed in the previous project. As we investigate strategies and techniques for controlling large scale projects from the urban level down to details and atmosphere, your projects will be fully articulated and detailed into a material environment.
Karin Matz
Rutger Sjögrim
KM is an architect (Edinburgh College of Art,
RS is an architect (MSc. Arch, KTH), lecturer
the University of Queensland, and KTH
at the School of Architecture at KTH and a
(MSc. Arch)), lecturer at the School of
principal at the architecture office
Architecture at KTH and principal at the
SECRETARY.
architecture office SECRETARY.
16
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1. Edwin Östlund Stockman, Headquarters for a large corporation, year four project vt ‘20 2. Lisa Chen, Headquarters for a large corporation, year four project vt ‘20 3. Anders Johnsson, Movements and Space, diploma project vt ‘19 4. A worker cleaning the windows of an apartment block in Beijing's central business district. 5. BBC News studio 6. Erik Ahnborg and Sune Lindström, Radiohuset Stockholm
6.
17
RETeachers: Mikael Bergquist, Thordis Arrhenius
CHANGE
Project 1
A central effect of global capitalism is the pressure of change. Urban
Archive
patterns and building programs are increasingly becoming redundant,
Archive is divided into a series of speculative workshops that will
demanding change to accommodate new functions, identities and
explore Stockholm’s postmodern heritage in collaboration with
economies. At an accelerating speed, dominated by the logic of
ArkDes. The workshops will form the studios documentary archive
obsolescence, the built becomes outdated and turned into waste.
and working material.
This in turn raises a new urgency for contemporary architectural culture to start addressing the pressure of change in alternative
Project 2
modes.
RE-Public Thep project is the development of an individual project based on the
PRESERVATION
findings in the workshops. Focusing specifically on publicness and
With the fundamental shift in our contemporary understanding of
ornament the project should be developed from architectural detail to
spatial and material resources, the architect is no longer primarily
urban scale.
occupied with making the new from scratch, but with making the new out of the past. In this condition preservation has won a new
Project 3
relevance for architecture that goes far beyond saving its canon of
RE-Store
buildings. In the urgent context of climate change preservation is
The project is an individual design proposal for the restoration of a
moving from the fringe of architectural culture into its core.
public space in Stockholm. Based on a real case scenario, the project should be fully developed from site and program to building
Re Master at KTH School of Architecture is a new master studio that
scale.
started in the autumn of 2019, with the aim of addressing the notion of change, permeance and resilience through the means of
Project 4
restoration, reuse and repair. We explore the already built, the already
RE-Publication
thought and imagined, on paper or in concrete, in pasts and in the
RE-Piubliation is a collaborative publication of the studios material
now, with the overall objective to push preservation into the core of
that will be the 3rd iteration in an ongoing series.
architectural production today For more information please see publications RE/01 and RE/02: www.remasterstudio.com www.issuu.com/kth-arkitekturskolan
Mikael Bergquist
Thordis Arrhenius
MB is an architect living and working in
TA is an architect and researcher educated at
Stockholm. Educated at KTH and the
KTH, the Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen
Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen. Started
and the AA. Her teaching and research is
his own office 1996. Editor and curator of
characterised by a dedication to
various books and exhibitions. The latest book
contemporary critical issues in heritage and
is ”Josef Frank: Villa Carlsten”, (Park Books,
urbanism. Her publications include:
2019) Participated in the Alternative Histories
”Experimental Preservation”, (Lars Müller
exhibition in London, Brussels 2019–20.
Publisher, 2016).
18
1. Outtake from 3d scan of Stockholm Public Library. Student: Oliver Cassidy.
19
Searching for Ma – Investigations of Space and Time Teachers: Leif Brodersen, Teres Selberg
Studio Theme
Project 1
Specificities in relation to artistic interdisciplinary production as
Reinterpreting Symmetries and Form
generators for ecological sustainability and social inclusion. Studies
Through deeper studies of emblematic buildings and their specific
of symmetry will be followed by complexity and contradictions.
beauty and qualities, we will develop an understanding for
Geometrical and irregular form and patterns as generators for
symmetrical and irregular composition, geometrical or random form
architectural space will be analyzed in selected architectural
as generators for architectural space. We will first document, re-
masterpieces - and we will propose design projects for alterations
represent and analyze existing architectural masterpieces. In the
and deconstructions. In the Fall, we will research natural and
second part of the project we will develop individual architectural
manmade landscapes in order to design a small Cultural Center in
projects by making alterations of the studied buildings. The project
memory of the artist Hilma af Klint at Munsö in Ekerö. In the Spring
definition is optional; deconstruction, studies of mannerism,
semester, we will learn from the Japanese context examining diversity,
reinterpretation, paraphrase, additions, alterations etc.
metabolism and other conceptions of space and time. We will also study different artistic interdisciplinary tools and methods, first the
Project 2
relation to dance and choreography and later between filmmaking
Hilma af Klint Center
and architecture. We will design a Dance House in the Million
By re-defining interpretations and using methods from the first
Programme context of Vårberg and a Film Studio Residence within
project, as well as studying the interplay between art and nature, we
the dense urban fabric of the megacity Tokyo.
will design an Cultural Center in memory of the artist Hilma af Klint at Munsö, Ekerö. The program includes an exhibition space, workshop
Teaching Methodology
areas and a small library. The surrounding landscape and how it can
This studio investigates different experiences of architecture and
be reshaped to create a fictive or spiritual parallel experience will be
conceptions of space in relation to the synthesizing design process.
of great focus. Studies of cultural landscapes, man made nature and
We explore basic architectural concepts such as gravity, emptiness,
sustainable ecological approaches.
speed, light, sound, color, tactility, etc. We have developed a methodology wherein students and teachers collaborate in a kind of
Project 3
research-by-design structure. The students define and formulate their
Dance House in Vårberg
own projects from a given topic and self-program their projects to
In this project we will study different artistic tools and methods
reflect on the problems and possibilities described in the analysis
focusing on dance and choreography and develop individual
and definition of the context. The aim is to provide tools and methods
architectural projects investigating the relationships between dance,
in order to give the students an independent, innovative, artistic,
movement, gravity, body and space. The brief is a small dance house
professional, ethical, and scientific identity. Every project is specific
for the local youth in the suburb of Vårberg, intending to use dance
and independent, but also relates to the general theme.
as social interaction and cultural production for social sustainability. Project 4 Film Studio Residence Ii Tokyo In this project we will study Japanese traditional and contemporary culture and architecture, including important concepts such as ‘Ma’ and ‘Oku’. The brief has its starting point in the understanding of the diverse urban fabric of the Tokyo Metropolitan Area as well as in the concept of film-making (directing, editing, and producing) in relation to architecture and contemporary cultural movements. These studies will be applied in the design of a Film Studio Residence in Tokyo.
LEIF BRODERSEN
TERES SELBERG
LB started teaching at the KTH School of
TS is an Adjunct Teacher at KTH
Architecture in 1996. and an Associate
Architecture. She runs her own artistic
Professor since 2004 . He served as Head of
practice connecting dance and architecture
the School 2005-2012. He is also a founding
and is a member of the organization
partner at the Stockholm-based practice
Dansbana! creating public places for dance.
2BK Arkitekter, established 1999.
2006 she co-founded Architects without frontiers in Sweden.
20
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. 1. Kunio Maekawa House, 1942 2. Cloudscapes by Tetsuo Kondo at the 12th Architecture Biennale in Venice, 2010 3. Tokyo, Koenji urban fabric. 4. Okurayama apartments by Kazuyo Seijima, 2008 5. Studio 24, Roy Andersson Film Production 6. Bodies in Urban Spaces by Willie Dorner, 2014 7. Hilma Af Klint - The Swan, No. 12, Group IX SUW, 1915
7.
21
Urbanism and Landscape Studio Teachers: Ania Öst, Hanna Erixon Aalto, Måns Tham
Artificial inhabited islands, growing reeves, or eiderdown farming?
Project 3
What will the future habitats and practices of Stockholmers be?
A communicative strategic general plan for the development of new
The Urbanism and Landscape Studio focuses on cities, landscapes
relationships between Stockholm and its water borders is developed.
and territories in the broader context of the environmental crisis.
The masses excavated for the subway is the main agent of change.
What can the role of designers be in addressing Agenda 2030,
Through the lens of art and architecture we will test and project
including urgent and interconnected problems such as rapid
scenarios for where and how new relations with water could develop.
urbanization, biodiversity loss, social inequity and severe global climate changes affecting our cities? Drawing on the nexus of ideas
Project 4
within landscape/ecological urbanism, resilience theory, and the
P4 is a stand-alone project. Each student will develop a proposal for
environmental humanities, the studio challenges the modernist idea
how a new habitat of Stockholm can develop in a resilient way.
of the city as a fixed, delimited territory contrasting the ‘natural’ world
Designing a habitat includes shaping physical structures and
around us. Instead, we explore landscape and ecology as organizers
environments for humans as well as other agents that are grown out
of urban space; as providers of catalytic urban strategies that can
of sustainable practices and cultures. Our aim is to compare vastly
embrace complexity, multi-functionality and change over time.
different outcomes and trajectories. P3 and P4 will include guest
Teaching methodology
lectures and seminars with renowned scholars such as Nina-Marie
We empower students to develop a critical and systematic outlook to the urban and global problems we face through the study of
Lister at Ryerson and Klaus Loenhart, at TU Graz, and the work will result in an exhibition.
hands-on. Urban design is an inclusive, reflective and, by necessity, transdisciplinary practice and we work closely with decision makers, activists, local organizations, and experts. Learning from history, we will study how forces of nature, culture and infrastructure have shaped city life. Through combining the critical and the suggestive; analysis and innovation, we develop bold scenarios that reframe the human-nature relationship. We see outcomes that reveal unexpected potentials ranging in scale from the territorial, the neighborhood, down to the detail of a home. Mass and Water In the spring of 2021, the studio is part of an ongoing collaboration between the City of Stockholm, KTH and a studio of practitioners. We investigate how millions of tons of stone generated during the expansion of Stockholm's subway can be the catalyst for new resilient urban environments. Historically, land rise and the conjunction of freshwater and saltwater is the raison d'être of Stockholm. Considering the effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels and increased water flows—as well as the rapid growth of Stockholm—the studio sees the opportunity to take a holistic approach to the potential that 7 million tons of rock brings. The challenges are severe: The Baltic ecosystem is collapsing and by 2050, the sea level rise is estimated to exceed the land rise. In 2100 Lake Mälaren could once again become part of the Baltic Sea and the city would lose its drinking water supply. !!! Please note: This studio is just given in the spring of 2021 and is mainly available for those who’ve taken the Fragmentation and Coherence Studio.
Ania Öst
Hanna Erixon Aalto
Måns Tham
AÖ is a multidisciplinarian with a master in
HEA is an architect and urbanist, writer and
MT is an architect and urban strategist. He
architecture. AÖ combines practice with
lecturer. She holds a doctor in Philosophy
received his education at Lunds School of
research and has taught in higher education
with the thesis Projecting Urban Natures and
Architecture, UC Berkeley and Mejan-ARC in
since 2010 at KTH and at TU Graz, Austria.
has taught since 2005 at KTH. The core of
Stockholm. He has taught at KTH since
She is starting up the practice GAIA ark, with
her interest revolves around finding new
2014 and runs his own practice Måns Tham
like-minded, focusing on reconnecting human
ways of involving a multitude of actors in the
Arkitektkontor (manstham.com) that focuses
habitats with our living environment through
development of resilient future strategies for
on urban planning, proactive strategies and
innovation.
sustainable landscapes.
built architecture.
22
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. Oyster-techture, Brooklyn NY. Kate Orff, SCAPE, 2016. 2. Rethinking happiness, curated by Aldo Cibic at the Venice Architecture Biennale. 2010. 3. Agnes Denes, Wheatfield—A Confrontation. 1982. Photo by John McGrall. 4. LCLA Office, MEDELLIN.The river-that-is-not. Zona Norte, 2014. 5. Högdalstoppen, Svenska Dagbladet, Blomquist, Åke. 15 april 1957.
5.
23
