TUT Department of Architecture Project by Kyle Philip Coulson October 2018
LOCKED
SpaceLab FIVE
TARGET
05
1
FIVE 2
Fig. x - Isolated in a public space
PAGE NUM.
04 08 35 38 58 62 64
SPACE DEFINED BY PHYSICAL ELEMENTS DURBAN CONTEXT HARBOUR CONTEXT SALISBURY ISLAND POINT DEVELOPMENT LIST OF FIGURES BIBLIOGRAPHY
-TENTS
CON-
FIVE:5.1
SPACE DEFINED BY PHYSICAL ELEMENTS
FIVE 6
Steyn (2013, p. 16) states that it is instinctive impulse to view architecture as a receptacle of space; it is a physical container by which space is a by-product. Ching (2007, pp. 96– 97) considers the positive and negative space of the image which reflects either two faces, or a vase; he explains that the one cannot exist without the other, and similarly with architecture, form and space together form the reality of architecture. Ching concludes that architectural form occurs at the juncture between mass and space. Ching (2007, pp. 103–160) explains that form defines space in two ways: 1. Base planes, which define or inhabit the space above them, where the vertical plane becomes implied. The base plane can be elevated, flat, depressed or overhead. The overhead plane defines the space below, instead of the space above (Ching, 2007, p. 102). 2. Vertical planes, which are critical in that they create visual limits in the spatial field. Vertical planes also serve to separate one space from another, and most notably become a boundary between exterior and interior. The vertical plane can consist of vertical linear elements—a single vertical plane, L-shaped plane, parallel planes, U-shaped planes, or an enclosure of four planes.
The impulse to view architecture as a receptacle of space has been inherited from Renaissance thinking, which was originally inspired by classical Greek thought that was concerned with mass in space, instead of space as an architectural substance (Van de Ven, 1978, p. 191). Architecture was originally positioned as a fulfilment of the basic human need for shelter, but this has changed with the emergence of Modern architecture. According to Van de Ven (1978, p. 239), Modernism introduced a fundamental shift in the definition of architecture. Space was introduced as an inherent, immaterial dimension of architecture, and no longer seen as a result of elemental composition. Jenson (1998, p. 323) states that space, by definition, is the most immaterial of all means of artistic expression and that space is also the most difficult aspect of architecture. However, space is also the ultimate destination to which architecture addresses itself. With the rise of space as a theoretical premise within architecture, the definition of the term has become blurred. Bruno Zevi (1957, p. 30) attempts to describe space as a multi-dimensionality, which has a layering of aspects that define it. Scruton (Jenson, 1998, p. 324) follows a more Cartesian (Euclidean) notion of space, whereby space is identical to
that which constitutes its spatiality (i.e. length, width, and thickness). This defines space as the remaining void between the material. Jenson elaborates that both of these theories are limited because the theories exclude the notion that humans interact with space. Steyn (2013, p. 16) proposes that the definition of space should be architectural space that is occupied. Therefore, architectural space as a container, volume or Euclidean space intersects with the activity, movement, and the interpretation of its inhabitants. Jenson (1998, p. 326) explains that when one inhabits an architectural space, the experiential qualities of this encounter do not consist solely of geometrically based relationships of substance or volume, but on the occupation of such spaces by the faculty of imagination. Steyn (2013, p. 16) enquires whether the conflation of space and activity presents an ethical imperative to architecture. Referring to Le Corbusier’s writings in Towards a New Architecture, Steyn writes that Le Corbusier referred to the “modern man” in a “modern society” and Le Corbusier assumed that this modern man would have an appreciation for the machine. Steyn suggests that if architecture could emulate this perfection, and could influence cultural identity and behaviour, it follows that a perfected society
could emerge from Le Corbusier’s perfected architecture. Unfortunately, modern-day machines are far more complex than the machines of the 1920s and therefore create an unfinished world, saturated with glitches. Le Corbusier’s idea about modern man is one of the issues that this mini-dissertation uses to showcase the negative impact modernism had on nature. Jensen (1998, p. 326) concludes that architectural space can never be envisioned as a void contained between physical elements; space is an environment that compromises light, sound, materiality, imagination, and form. Behaviour forms part of the definition of space and adds to the concept of triangulated difference, where space is not a contrast of physical and void, but a combination of physical elements, activity and the void, which collectively constitute the architectural space. Therefore, the creation of architecture defines space, but allows for an opportunity for the user experience of space to be enhanced.
FIVE 7
ARCHITECTURE Durban has a unique and diverse array of architecture styles, noticeably the art deco, Victorian and Edwardian style with an eclectic mix of Islamic architecture. Recent years have seen the introduction of more contemporary structures across the metropolitan, with quite a lot of development in the sport zone, along the pier, as well as inner-city rejuvenation.
CLIMATE Durban is classified as a humid sub-tropical climate, with humid, high temperature summers and warm, dry winters.
Fig.1_ Durban montage
DURBAN
FIVE:5.2
DURBAN CONTEXT Durban is a multicultural society with a complex history dating back to the original settlers, the Khoi-San. Durban has a natural bay, which was one of the key attractions for the European settlers, who developed a port. The city of Durban developed as a result of this port. On Christmas Day 1497, Vasco de Gama sailed into the mouth of Durban Bay and named it Rio de Natal (Christmas River). In the years that followed, Rio de Natal developed into a sanctuary for explorers and sailors as the natural bay offers protection against ocean storms, one of few natural bays along the southern African coastline (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, p. 11).
FIVE 10
In 1840, Durban became a British colony. The sandbar prevented easy movement for ships and thus established the “battle of the bar”. The port engineers implemented several schemes between 1850 and the 1900s. However, the relationship between the port and the city clashed from the beginning. The port focuses on maximising the volume of freight across the quay, and the city desires maximum economic benefits for its citizens. The first settlers arrived in 1823, by ship— The Salisbury. The Salisbury vessel was forced to anchor in a sheltered area while the accompanying ship, The Julia sailed over the sandbar to survey the bay. Lieutenant King, who commanded the ship, befriended King Shaka Zulu who granted him land around the bay (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, p. 12). The town of Durban had a total of 15 settlers
in 1835. There was peace between the settlers and the Zulu Kingdom when Shaka Zula was still reigning. When Dingane took over the Zulu Kingdom, he started showing open animosity and aggression towards the settlers (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, chap. 12). In 1844, the British annexed the southern portion of Natal to the already existing Cape Colony. In 1860, a railway was introduced and the settlers found the Zulus to be uncooperative workers. As a result, the British imported the first indentured Indians to work in the sugar cane fields. So-called passenger Indians accompanied the workers. These Indians where free to engage in business. Like many South African cities, Durban still bears the imprint of the colonial planning. George Cato implemented a three-street town plan, with two parallel main streets. However, this rigid grid structure started deforming as it spread to the surrounding landscape, creating an extremely convoluted layout of the Durban suburbs. The city centre still has remnants of its colonial origin, with neo-classical buildings and colonial statues. The city is also still named after its founder Benjamin D’Urban, although the municipality is now referred to by its Zulu name, eThekwini (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, p. 12).
H I
By 1890, the railway line was connected to Johannesburg, which assisted travellers who travelled to South Africa for the gold rush. In 1900, the town had a sewage system,
hardened roads and water reticulation. The expanded railway attracted more people from the Transvaal to vacation in Durban, which established it as the tourist destination that it still is today. Later, Durban also served as a main disembarkment point for British troops assisting in the rising conflicts in the colony. By this time, Salisbury Island had been developed as a Royal Navy outpost, to assist during World War II. By 1935, Durban was granted city status. In 1950, the Group Areas Act was implemented, formalising the communities while large townships where constructed. The municipal boundaries have been increased over the years and resulted in the larger eThekwini Municipality (eThekwini Municipality, 2011).
S T O R Y
FIVE 11
INNER CITY LAYOUT
FIVE 12
Fig.2_ 1892 map
1892: Map of the natural bay with the initial
city grid slightly visible. The site is a natural island within the middle of the bay with wild life on the edges of the bay.
SITE
FIVE 13
FIVE 14
Fig.3_ Central post office 1885
Fig.4_ Durban station 1894
FIVE 15
Fig.5_ City hall 1903
Fig.6_ 1919 map
FIVE 16
INNER CITY LAYOUT
1920:
The city grid has formalized and developed along the bay. The natural bay has also started to formalize around the edges of the bay.
SITE
FIVE 17
FIVE 18
Fig.7_ Memorial tower 1946
Fig.8_ Enterprise building 1931
FIVE 19
Fig.9_ Art deco building
FIVE 20
Fig.10_ 1958 map
1958:
The bay is mapped for bigger vessels to move through bay, Salisbury Island (site) is formalized by the Royal Navy and a thoroughfare is added to the main land with further development on the bluff side of the bay, train infrastructure introduced into the port
INNER CITY LAYOUT
SITE
FIVE 21
Fig.11_ Nedbank building 1961
Fig.13_ Riebeeck 1965
Fig.12_ Crasulla 1967
Fig.14_ Sugar Terminal 1962
FIVE 22
Fig.15_ House Masjoda
FIVE 23
Fig.16_ Ocean Jetty 1961
CONTAINER PIER
Fig.17_ 1985 map
1985: The port is formalized around the
edges of the bay and Pier 1 and container pier was built into the middle of the bay as well as the train infrastructure expanded around the bay
INNER CITY LAYOUT
PIER 1
SITE
Fig.18_ KZNSA Gallery 1995
Fig.19_ Mangosuthu Technikon 1982
Fig.20_ Joe Slovo building 1982
INNER CITY
SUGAR MILL
CONTAINER CARGO
Fig.21_ 2018 map
NER CITY
2018: The port is formalized around the
edges of the bay and Pier 1 and container pier was built into the middle of the bay as well as the train infrastructure expanded around the bay
EB
SIT
PIER 1
THE BLUFF EA
NORTH
SIT
Fig.22_ Durban Stadium
Fig.23_ Convention center 1994
Fig.24_ Investec Building
Fig.25_ Proud Heritage 2006
Fig.26_ Unilever 2010
FIVE 36
FIVE:5.3
HARBOUR CONTEXT Before the industrial boom, the original bay housed an opulent mangrove forest on its edges where crocodiles, flamingos and hippopotamuses roamed free. The hills surrounding the bay were home to lions, elephants and hyenas. There was also a massive sandbank in the middle of the bay (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, p. 11). The British colony realised in 1840, that the success of the colony lies within the import and export of goods through the port of Natal. The original plan was unable to go ahead due to financial constraints and the sandbank located at the entrance of the bay, which also raised a lot of concerns. Port engineers focused on the sandbank from 1850–1900, and by late 1930s the “battle of the bar” was won. The port has always been of national importance, whereas the city has only been of municipal concern. Unsurprisingly, the port and city have always had different goals—the port focuses on increasing and maximising freight across the quay, while the city strives to maximise economic benefits for its citizens (Mather, no date, p. 131). As one of the busiest ports in Africa, the harbour forms a pinnacle point of the city and is the heart of the Durban economy. The port itself employs roughly 50 000 individuals and this estimate excludes external firms that depend on the port in some way or another (Mather, no date, p. 130). The port is South Africa’s main general cargo and container port, and handles around 31,4 million tons of cargo with an estimated worth of R50 billion each year. The port is one of few in the world that is right next to the central business district. Pilotage is also compulsory at the port, which means a designated port captain is flown to the vessel outside the port and the port captain then pilots the vessel into the harbour (Mather, no date, p. 135).
Fig.27_ Durban Harbour
FIVE 37
Fig.28_ Durban Harbour at night
FIVE:5.4
SALISBURY ISLAND Before the industrial boom, the original bay housed an opulent mangrove forest on its edges, where crocodiles, flamingos and hippopotamuses roamed free. The hills surrounding the bay were home to lions, elephants and hyenas. There was also a massive sandbank in the middle of the bay, which was later removed to open the bay to bigger ocean fairing vessels (eThekwini Municipality, 2011, p. 11).
FIVE 40
As one of the busiest ports in Africa, the harbour forms a pinnacle point of the city and is the heart of the Durban economy. The port itself employs roughly 50 000 individuals and this estimate excludes external firms that depend on the port in some way or another (Mather, n.d., p. 130). The port is South Africa’s main general cargo and container port, and handles around 31,4 million tons of cargo with an estimated worth of R50 billion each year. The port is one of few in the world that is right next to the central business district. Pilotage is also compulsory at the port, which means a designated port captain is flown to the vessel outside the port and the port captain then pilots the vessel into the harbour (Mather, n.d., p. 135). Salisbury Island has got an extremely complex and rich history and although the buildings on the site are significant, the real heritage aspect lies with the site and its interaction with the community and city. The island has the ability, if opened to the public—even partially—to be reimagined and reused to inject new economic vitality, job creation and urban design benefits for the city of Durban. The existing buildings on the site were originally established as workshops and factories to construct and maintain ocean vessels. The new function celebrates the
original purpose of the buildings by adapting them to once again build a type of vessel; a space vessel. The key difference between the old function and the new, is that the old function restricted any form of public interaction, whereas the new site encourages it. The existing infrastructure on site has been investigated. Unfortunately, since the site is a military base, I was not granted access onto site and because of its sensitive nature, photographs, information and plans are extremely limited. The investigation has therefore been conducted through models, found information and photographs on public platforms, google earth and documents from the Department of Defence archives and museum. The information gathered shows that most of the buildings are in a dilapidated state due to lack of maintenance and financing. Some buildings are unoccupied, and some are completely damaged because of a tropical storm. Therefore, it is not possible or practical to preserve all the existing buildings. Those that will be preserved, must be adapted significantly for their new function, introducing new structure, foundations and services. The current site is also not currently used to its full capacity. The naval base only houses three offshore patrol vessels; therefore, the naval base is transferred to the southern portion of the site. The remaining part of the site will be rezoned for the space centre and a significant part as commercial public space. Salisbury Island is situated at the water’s edge, within a port typology, so it is important to understand the connection to the water’s edge and the connection to the port and the city.
FIVE 41
Fig.29_ Salisbury Island
FIVE 42
FIVE 43
Fig.30_ Salisbury Island view
S Public access to site
RSA N RSA Navy Home base Construction of road and rail way to site
FIVE 44
Royal Navy takes control of the site Imperial airways station // flying boats in the Harbour Quarantine station established on site Jetty and channel development Colonial authorities remove settlers Headquarters for first commercial Indian fishing industry Indian immigrants settle permanently
Indian immigrants use site for fishing industry Site is used as a leisure spot for picnickers, water sport activities and Holiday homes for the wealthy
1861 1865 1870
1900
1930
ISLAND
1941
1948
1957
SALISBURY Time-line of Salisbury Island, Illustrated by author, information from (Maitland, 2016)
SpaceLab Naval base Naval station All recreational activity ends and site is closed to public Pier 1 construction starts University college for Indians Reclamation of land behind site RSA Navy Home base moves to Simon’s Town
me base
rail way to site
FIVE 45
l of the site
our
1957 1960
1969
2002 2012 2018
Fig.31_ Salisbury Island aerial photo
SI T E -
FIVE 46
NO
RTH
NO
RTH DRAWING NAME
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Project Name
EX PLO R A T IO N
PROJECT NAME
Fig.32_ Salisbury Island plan
FIVE 47
Fig.33_ Salisbury Island inverted figure ground map
FIVE 48
NO
RTH
Fig.34_ Salisbury Island figure ground map
FIVE 49
NO
RTH
FIVE 50
NO Fig.35_ Salisbury Island existing
structure massing model
RTH
RT H NO
FIVE
FOCUS AREA
51
Fig.36_ Salisbury Island existing
structure detail model
Fig.37_ Existing built structure
investigation
FIVE 52
Note: Structure was developed from public accessible photographs that where taken inside the structure. Photos are available with author
Fig.38_ Existing built structure
investigation detail model facade
BUILDING FIVE 53
EXPLORATION
FIVE 54
FIVE 55
Fig.39_ Existing built structure
investigation detail model interior
Fig.40_ Existing built structure
investigation detail model interior volume
FIVE 56
FIVE 57
FIVE 58
Fig.41_ Existing built structure
interior perspective
FIVE 59
FIVE:5.5
POINT DEVELOPMENT The author recognizes the proposal made for Point development and responds to the proposal. There is also no critical stance taken on the typology and ideals of the development. The mini-dissertation proposes that Space Lab becomes a tenant in one of the buildings by renting out two floors as the Mission Control centre. This gives a clear view of the launching barge that will be situated out in the ocean.
FIVE 60
Fig.42_ Point development rendering
FIVE 61
FIVE 62
Fig.43_ Durban promenade with launch
FIVE 63
Figure 1- Durban montage. 2018. By Author Figure 2 - 1892 map. 2018. Photo taken by Author, (Map viewed at the Department of Architecture archives, University of KwaZulu-Natal) Figure 3 - Cental post office 1885. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durban-cityguide/victorian-and-edwardian/centralpost-office Figure 4 - Durban station 1894. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durban-cityguide/victorian-and-edwardian/durbanstation. [Accessed: 02-07-2018] Figure 5 - City hall. 2018. https://www. kznia.org.za/durban-city-guide/victorianand-edwardian/city-hall. [Accessed: 02-07-2018]
FIVE 64
Figure 6 - 1919 map. 2018. Photo taken by Author, (Map viewed at the Department of Architecture archives, University of KwaZulu-Natal) Figure 7 - Memorial tower 1946. 2018. By Author Figure 8 - Enterprise building 1931. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durbancity-guide/art-deco/enterprise-building. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 9 - Art deco building. 2018. By Author Figure 10 - 1958 map. 2018. Photo taken by Author, (Map viewed at the Department of Architecture archives, University of KwaZulu-Natal) Figure 11 - Nedbank building 1961. 2018. By Author Figure 12 - Crasulla 1967. 2018. By Author Figure 13 - Riebeeck 1965. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durban-cityguide/modernism/crasulla. [Accessed: 05-07-2018]
Figure 14 - Sugar Terminal 1962. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durbancity-guide/modernism/sugar-terminal. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 15 - House Masjoda 1961. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durban-cityguide/modernism/house-masojada. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 16 - Ocean Jetty 1961. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durban-cityguide/modernism/ocean-terminal-t-jetty. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 17 - 1985 map. 2018. Photo taken by Author, (Map viewed at the Department of Architecture archives, University of KwaZulu-Natal) Figure 18 - KZNSA Gallery 1995. 2018. By Author Figure 19 - Mangosuthu Technikon 1982. 2018. By Author Figure 20 - Joe Slovo building 1982. 2018. https://www.kznia.org.za/durbancity-guide/late-modern/88-joe-slovo-str. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 21 - 2018 map. 2018. By Author, (Original map from MapAble) Figure 22 - Durban Stadium. 2018. http://andrewrhbphotography. co.za/durban-my-hometown-in-bw/. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 23 - Convention center 1994. 2018. By Author Figure 24 - Investec Building 2010. 2018. By Author Figure 25 - Proud Heritage 2006. 2018. By Author Figure 26 - Unilever 2010. 2018. By Author Figure 27 - Durban Harbour. 2018. https://andrewharvardphotography. com/tag/durban-south-africa/page/14/. [Accessed: 05-07-2018]
Figure 29 - Salisbury Island. 2013. https://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/ kwazulu-natal/navy-to-return-to-durbanssalisbury-island-1496219. [Accessed: 05-07-2018] Figure 30 - Salisbury Island view. 2018. By Author Figure 31 - Salisbury Island aerial photo. 2018. By Author Figure 32 - Salisbury Island plan. 2018. By Author Figure 33 - Salisbury Island inverted figure ground map. 2018. By Author Figure 34 - Salisbury Island figure ground map. 2018. By Author Figure 35 - Salisbury Island existing structure massing model. 2018. By Author Figure 36 - Salisbury Island existing structure detail model. 2018. By Author Figure 37 - Existing built structure investigation. 2018. By Author Figure 38 - Existing built structure investigation detail model facade. 2018. By Author Figure 39 - Existing built structure investigation detail model interior. 2018. By Author Figure 40 - Existing built structure investigation detail model interior volume. 2018. By Author Figure 41 - Existing built structure interior perspective. 2018. By Author Figure 42 - Point development rendering. 2018. https://northglennews. co.za/130287/first-phase-billion-randpoint-waterfront-project-launched/. [Accessed: 05-07-2018]
Figure 43 - Durban promenade with launch. 2018. By Author Figure X - Isolated in a public space. 2018. By Author
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 28 - Durban Harbour at night. 2018. https://clhg.com/blog/2012/11/ ten-things-you-didnt-know-about-durban/. [Accessed: 05-07-2018]
FIVE 65
BIB LI O GR A PH Y
Ching, F. D. K. (2007) Form, Space and Order. Third. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eThekwini Municipality (2011) Durban. Durban. Jenson, M. (1998) ‘Space in Architecture: A reinterpratation of its essential role’, in ACSA International Conference. Boulder.
FIVE 66
Maitland, V. (2016) Heritage Impact Assessment for the Proposed Landside Infrastructure Development at Berth 203 to 205, African Centre for heritage activites. Mather, A. A. (no date) ‘Durban and its Port : An Investigation into the relationship between the City and port of Durban’, Retours d’expériences internationales, 2, pp. 127–142. Steyn, S. (2013) Narrative factory. University of Pretoria. Van de ven, C. (1978) Space in Architecture. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum Assen. Zevi, B. (1957) Space as Architecture. New York: Horizon Press.