Globalists Using London Cyberspace Summit to Push for Global Internet Treaty Eric Blair 1. Activist Post November 1, 2011 For the next two days, leaders from around the globe will collude with tech giants to discuss how to respond to the challenges and opportunities of the Internet. Translation: they’ll be negotiating a global Internet treaty. It’s reported that officials from 60 countries will join Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Tudou.com (Chinese video sharing site), as well as cyber crime agencies, and computer security firms at the London Conference on Cyberspace. The London summit is hosted by Foreign Secretary, William Hague, who said the purpose is to “discuss ideas and expected behaviour in cyberspace”. To which he claims the goal is bring together major players to determine how “collectively, we should respond to the challenges and opportunities which the development of cyberspace presents.” A few days before the conference, Council on Foreign Relations members Adam Segal and Matthew Waxman wrote that the conference presents those calling for a global Internet treaty with “a step in that direction.” They also pointed out that NATO allies have already essentially agreed to a treaty; “June 2011, NATO defense ministers agreed to a collective vision of cyber defense, and the United States and Australia recently announced that their mutual defense treaty extends to cyberspace.” Meanwhile, in September of this year, an alliance between Russia, China, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan collaborated on cybersecurity by introducing The International Code of Conduct for Information Security to the U.N. Secretary General. This alliance views “information security” to mean combating the dissemination of certain types of information which “undermines other countries’ political, economic and social stability, as well as their spiritual and cultural environment.” In other words, if passed, political dissent on the Internet would be censored by U.N. decree. Analysts explained the power struggle to be that Western states want to protect their networks
from cyber attacks, while China and Russia seek security of information, which means controlling content. Western powers will preach Internet freedom to their counterparts at this conference, yet they themselves have engaged in draconian measures like arbitrarily seizing websites for merely linking to copyrighted material and ordering politically “harmful” material removed from websites like YouTube. Also, in a blatant act of censorship, they infamously colluded with Amazon to drop hosting service to WikiLeaks. What’s more, multiple bills are floating in the U.S. Congress that seek further control over the Internet like the recent “rogue websites” bill which one Representative called the “end of the Internet.” At the same time, the new net neutrality rules initiated without Congress, rather by the FCC with a 3-2 vote (where one commissioner was rewarded with a cushy job at Comcast), go into effect on November 20th. So, while they talk a good game about protecting free speech, the U.S. and other Western powers seem to have similar ambitions to censor the Internet as China and Russia do, each already using private Internet cartels to do their dirty work. Therefore, they’re likely not as far off from agreeing on a treaty as the mainstream press is letting on. Where they may not agree, however, is how to respond to potential cyber crimes and suspected threats. China, while strongly denying any government involvement, has been blamed for many recent cyber attacks. Therefore, China, and most others, tend to take the approach of prosecuting cyber crimes through a legal process. The Pentagon, on the other hand, in their recently released cybersecurity strategy, said the military would be “prepared to respond to hostile acts in cyberspace.” “The United States reserves the right, under the laws of armed conflict, to respond to serious cyber attacks with a proportional and justified military response at the time and place of our choosing,” said Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn at a speech announcing the new strategy. Most nations want to legally separate cybersecurity from traditional security concerns. So, if only America can convince other attendees to police the Internet with predator drones, they may actually agree to a global Internet treaty.
Seven Billion People: Over-Population or Birth Dearth? Janice Shaw Crouse 1. American Thinker November 1, 2011 In what was perhaps the biggest global birthday celebration in decades, our planet welcomed its seven billionth person. Although no one knew the exact time or day population totals would reach that count, the United Nations declared Monday, October 31 to be the expected date that would symbolically mark the occasion. Likewise, no one knew for sure who exactly the seven billionth person would be or where he or she would be born, so “7-billionth babies” all over the world were welcomed. In the Philippines, Danica May Camacho was greeted to joyous ovation and was presented with a huge birthday cake with the inscription “7B Philippines.” Although she was born on Sunday at 11:58 pm, doctors at Manila’s Jose Fabella Memorial Hospital considered it within close enough proximity to be deemed a Monday birth. Yet, not everyone extended a warm and hearty greeting to these newborns. Along with the festivities came words of caution from those berating our planet’s limited resources and supposed overpopulation crisis. According to Dr. Eric Tayag of the Philippines’ Department of Health, “Seven billion is a number we should think about deeply. We should really focus on the question of whether there will be food, clean water, shelter, education and a decent life for every child. If the answer is ‘no,’ it would be better for people to look at easing this population explosion.” In an interview with Russ Mitchell of CBS News, Joel Cohen, a demographer at Rockefeller University, added, “If we could slow our growth rate, we have an easier job in dealing with all the other things like education, health, employment, housing, food, the environment and so on.” Finally, a recent Reuters article suggested, “One important policy tool to manage a growing population is to give women access to family planning, experts say, adding that 215 million women worldwide want it but do not get it. Access to education is also important as it motivates women to reduce their fertility and improve their children’s health.” According to Reuters, “resources are under more
strain than ever before,” and a major concern is “how to provide basic necessities for the additional 2-3 billion people expected to be added in the next 50 years.” While these warnings are espoused by seemingly reputable organizations and claim to be steeped in research, in reality, they are mere scare tactics designed to elevate environmentalism over human expansion. The phrases “giv[ing] women access to family planning” and “motivat[ing] women to reduce their fertility” are simply codes for easier access to contraception and elective abortion. In his 1. article, “Taking on the overpopulation myth,” Joseph A. D’Agostino asserts that “the world’s population growth rate maxed out in 1965 and has been in sharp decline.” He continues, quoting Steven Mosher, president of Population Research Institute: “The unprecedented fall in fertility rates that began in postwar Europe has, in the decades since, spread to every corner of the globe, affecting China, India, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America,” says Mr. Mosher. “The latest forecasts by the United Nations show the number of people in the world shrinking by midcentury, that is, before today’s young adults reach retirement age.” Mr. Mosher is also an expert on China, a country that has advocated a gruesome population control plan through its “one-child policy,” which has led to forced abortions and infanticide and has literally prevented hundreds of millions of births since its establishment in 1978. According to demographer Phillip Longman, birthrates have dropped by over 50 percent since 1979 (from 6 to about 2.8 children per woman), and he says that the U.N. statistics reveal that by 2100, approximately 25 percent of people globally will be over the age of 60. The UN Population Division (UNPD) estimates that by 2050, there will be 248 million fewer children (under five years of age) worldwide than there are now. In developed nations generally, 20 percent of the population is over 60. By 2050, 32 percent will be over 60. According to UNPD, these nations will then have two elderly persons for every child. “Ten billion people by 2100 creates a nice headline, but when you get inside the numbers, you see a growing population of seniors, combined with a dearth in babies being born,” Longman said. According to a May 2008 New York Times article by Sam Roberts and Sean D. Hamill, “In the 1990s, deaths outnumbered births in…four [U.S.] metropolitan areas with more than 250,000 people, and three of those were in the South. Since 2000, 10 metropolitan areas – half of them outside the south – have suffered a net loss of population to natural decrease.”
There are many contributing factors to these plummeting birth rates, not least of which is abortion. In 2003 alone, there were 42 million abortions worldwide (equal to the entire population of Italy).Moreover, contraception on demand paired with rising cohabitation rates have so removed the concept of sex from childbirth that children become only an option. Currently, just under half of the world’s population uses some form of birth control. They are delaying marriage and children longer and longer in the pursuit of careers and sub-par living arrangements that foster an ethic of selfishness and disdain for large families. Finally, a loss of faith has played a key role in diminishing birth rates. In Europe, which has a weekly church attendance of only 5 percent, the birthrate is 1.5. In the U.S., where 42 percent of people attend religious services weekly, the birthrate is 2.1, the minimal replacement rate. Today our world reaches a major population milestone, and that is great cause for celebration. And while many around the world are doing just that, far too many have bought into warped statistics and faulty estimates – the “overpopulation myth.” Their mentality has gone from “filling the earth” to “family planning,” and from “be fruitful and multiply” to “population control.” As we reexamine the “facts,” may we discover the truth and be challenged to celebrate life in all its fullness – yes, all seven billion of us.
Overpopulation is a lie of the New World Order Don’t Believe Anything The Main Stream Says They’re liars Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVOU5bfHrM 2.1 Kids: Stable Population http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBS6f-JVvTY Food: There's Lots Of It http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXrN9HhnCcM Poverty: Where We All Started http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUY4ztwIVfA 7 Billion People: Everybody Relax! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iodJ0OOdgRg