If The Clintons Are Worth 50 Million, Why Do They Get Nearly A Million A Year From The Taxpayers? by MICHAEL SNYDER | ECONOMIC COLLAPSE | JUNE 25, 2014
Since leaving the White House, the Clintons have earned at least 100 million dollars and currently have a net worth of up to 50 million dollars. So why in the world do the taxpayers need to give Bill Clinton$944,000 to fund his extravagant lifestyle in 2014? If ordinary Americans truly understood how much money many former politicians are being handed every year they would go bananas. According to a Congressional Research Service report that was published earlier this year, the federal government has given a total of nearly 16 million dollars to Bill Clinton since 2001. Each one of those dollars is a dollar that some U.S. taxpayer worked really hard for or that we had to borrow. Yes, we don’t want our former presidents to go broke for a whole bunch of reasons, but it is absolutely absurd that we are showering them with millions upon millions of dollars. Yesterday, I wrote about the trouble that Hillary has caused for herself by claiming that the Clintons were “dead broke” when they left the White House. The way things have been set up, there is no way in the world that any former president is going to be “dead broke” ever again unless the law is changed. According to the Washington Post, Bill Clinton has been receiving about a million dollars a year “for office space, staff, and a pension” since he left office… According to an April report from the Congressional Research Service, Bill Clinton has received nearly $16 million in pensions and benefits from the federal government since leaving office. That includes $944,000 in fiscal year 2014 for office space, staff, and a pension.
That is insanely wasteful. But wait, there’s more. George W. Bush is actually receiving more money from the taxpayers than Clinton is each year… Bush the younger is costing taxpayers $1.28 million this year, and averages 4 per cent more annual than Clinton. The government’s General Services Administration inexplicably budgeted $102,000 for Bush’s telephone expenses in 2014, and planned to spend $135,000 more on furniture, computers, office supplies and other miscellany. How in the world is George W. Bush racking up $102,000 in phone expenses a year? Does he have the world’s worst calling plan? And of course what we spend on our former presidents is peanuts compared to what we spend on our current president. According to author Robert Keith Gray, approximately 1.4 billiondollars is spent on the Obamas every year. Here are just a few nuggets from his book… -The Obamas have the “biggest staff in history at the highest wages ever“. -Obama has 469 senior staff working directly under him, and 226 of them make more than $100,000 a year. -There is always at least one projectionist at the White House 24 hours a day just in case there is someone that wants to watch a movie. -The “dog handler” for the family dog Bo reportedly makes $102,000per year and sometimes he is even flown to where the family is vacationing so that he can care for the dog. Yes, the White House needs a large staff. But at this point we spend more on our presidents than any nation on the planet does on their entire royal families. Over the years, the political elite have tilted the rules of the game dramatically in their favor. Neither political party objects because they both benefit from riding on the endless gravy train. If you can believe it, there are close to 15,000 retired federal employees that are currently collecting federal pensions for life worth at least $100,000 annually. This list includes names such as Newt Gingrich, Bob Dole, Trent Lott, Dick Gephardt and Dick Cheney.
And most people are astounded to hear that more than 4 million dollars a year is spent on the “personal” and “office” expenses of each U.S. Senator. Not that they need the money. As I wrote about recently, more than half of the members of Congress are millionaires at this point, and nearly 200 of them are multimillionaires. Politics in America has become a game that is played by the elite for the benefit of the elite. If it seems like they are “out of touch” with ordinary Americans that is because they are. Meanwhile, things just continue to get even tougher for the middle class. Even though money is flowing like wine in Washington D.C. for the moment, a brand new Gallup survey discovered that 58 percent of Americans believe that the economy is getting worse. It is shameful that our politicians are living like rock stars while tens of millions of American families are suffering so deeply. For example, consider the case of Andrew and Kristen Cummins… Andrew and Kristen Cummins and their 8-year-old son Colton have been in and out of homelessness for the past four years. It all started when Andrew moved to Indiana for a temporary warehouse job that was supposed to turn into a full-time job. But instead he said he was let go as soon as the company would have had to start providing him with full-time benefits. Since then, he has worked at several other temporary jobs that haven’t turned into full-time work either. Kristen has been in the same position: She has also had temporary jobs, but nothing has stuck. So for now, the three stay at a local homeless shelter called the Haven House. Since women and men are required to sleep in separate areas, Andrew doesn’t get to see his wife or son after 9 p.m. each night. There are millions of other families just like them that are scratching and clawing their way through life the best that they can. Perhaps our politicians should actually do something to help them instead of sitting back and living the high life at our expense.
Hillary Clinton Defended My Alleged Rapist, ‘Took Me Through Hell’: Ark. Woman BY Celeste Katz June 21, 2014,
Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton put her through “hell” says an alleged rape victim. Clinton defended the accused rapist when se was a young lawyer. A woman who says she was raped by an Arkansas man in the 1970s now says Hillary Clinton “took her through hell” as the defense attorney for the man charged in the case. In an interview with the Daily Beast website posted Friday, the woman charged that Clinton knowingly “lied like a dog” in attacking her credibility while representing the alleged rapist in 1975. The woman is now 52 but was just 12 at the time of the attack. She told the Daily Beast she would give Clinton a piece of her mind if she met the once and potential future presidential candidate today. “I would say, ‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me,” the website reported. “And you are supposed to be for women? You call that for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing,” said the woman, whose name was withheld out of privacy concerns. Clinton’s office did not respond to the Daily Beast’s request for comment. The case jumpedback into the headlines this week when the conservative Washington Free Beacon web site posted an audio clip from the 1980s of Clinton discussing the case, which was her first as a criminal defense attorney. The recording was made when Clinton was being interviewed for an Esquire magazine piece, a story that never ran.
David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images Hillary Rodham (C) seen as a young lawyer for the Rodino Committee. She was a public defender in Arkansas before this, and a woman has come forward saying that she went through hell due to her aggressive defense of an accused rapist, after Clinton was assigned the case. “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” Clinton said, with a chuckle, when talking about Thomas Alfred Taylor, the man she represented as a 27-year-old lawyer. The case ended when Clinton arranged a plea deal for a lesser charge of unlawful fondling of a minor. The victim spoke once before publicly — to Newsday, in 2008. At the time, she did not take issue with Clinton’s conduct. She now claims she was misrepresented in that article. In 2008, when the Clinton campaign was asked to respond, a Clinton spokesman said: “As she wrote in her book, 'Living History,' Senator Clinton was appointed by the Circuit Court of Washington County, Arkansas to represent Mr. Taylor in this matter. As an attorney and an officer of the court, she had an ethical and legal obligation to defend him to the fullest extent of the law. To act otherwise would have constituted a breach of her professional responsibilities." Clinton briefly mentioned the case in her 2003 book, “Living History,” saying she helped create the first rape crisis hotline in Arkansas not long afterward. With Clinton widely expected to launch a second campaign for the White House, the victim told the Daily Beast she felt compelled to question the former secretary of state’s honesty and persona as a role model for women and girls.
“I’m a little scared of her… When this all comes about, I’m a little worried she might try to hurt me, I hope not,” she said. “They can lie all they want, say all they want, I know what’s true.” Hillary Clinton Jokes about defending child rapist VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NySIBfco_4U Hannity vs Tamara Holder Hillary Clinton Defended Rapist 2014 VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-7gJvpAcyA Child Rape Victim Hillary Clinton 'Took Me Through Hell' -Rapist Goes Free VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QnmilCVzdw
INFOWARS.COM BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND